DOCSLIB.ORG

School Transportation Technician Annual Inspection Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
School Transportation Technician Annual Inspection Guide Annual Inspection and Maintenance Resource Guide May 2020 SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION UNIT 201 East Colfax Avenue, Denver, CO 80203 303-866-6655/303-866-6656 http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 4 Vehicle Inspection Program ................................................................................ 5 Annual Inspection Requirements .......................................................................... 7 PM Brake Inspection and Documentation Requirements ............................................... 9 Brake inspector Requirements ............................................................................ 10 Certification ................................................................................................ 11 Introduction to the Hands-On Performance Test ...................................................... 17 Records, Documentation, and Retention............................................................... 37 Forms ......................................................................................................... 41 STU-13 CDE Annual Inspector Test Answer Sheet ..................................................... 41 STU-19 Hands-On Test check list ........................................................................ 41 STU-20 Application for Annual Inspector Qualification or Recertification ........................ 42 STU-22 Application for Inspecting Site Certification ................................................. 42 STU-24 CDE Brake Inspector's Qualification Certificate .............................................. 43 STU-25 Affidavit of Annual Inspection .................................................................. 44 STU-26 CDE Annual Inspection/Preventive Maintenance Checklist ................................. 44 STU-27 Trailer Annual Inspection/Preventive Maintenance Checklist ............................. 44 STU-30 Hands-On Tester Qualification Recertification ............................................... 47 Section A. Road Test inspection ........................................................................ A-2 Chart A-1. Steering Wheel Play (Lash) Measurements Chart ....................................... A-4 Chart A-2. FMVSS.111 Mirror Adjustment ........................................................... A-12 Chart A-3. FORD Warning Lights / Buzzer ........................................................... A-22 Chart A-4. NAVISTAR Brake Failure Warning System Checks ..................................... A-23 Chart A-5. Ford Normal Brake System Conditions .................................................. A-24 Section B. Under Hood Inspection ...................................................................... B-2 Chart B-1. Belt Inspection ............................................................................. B-12 Chart B-2. Pulley Inspection .......................................................................... B-14 Chart B-3. Checking Belt Tension .................................................................... B-16 Section C. Interior Inspection ........................................................................... C-2 Chart C-1. First Aid Kit ................................................................................... C-7 Chart C-2. Body Fluid Cleanup Kit ..................................................................... C-8 Section D. Under Vehicle Inspection ................................................................... D-2 Page 2 of 361 Chart D-1. Tightening Steering Column Joint Bolts .................................................. D-3 Chart D-2. Steering Joints ............................................................................. D-12 Section E. Around Vehicle ............................................................................... E-2 Chart E-1. Service Door, Stop Arm, Amber and Red Warning Lights ............................. E-16 Chart E-2. Measuring Push Rod Travel ................................................................ E-19 Chart E-3. Air Brake Adjustment Chart ............................................................... E-21 Chart E-4. Tire Wear ....................................................................................E-24 Section T: Trailer Inspection ............................................................................ T-2 Appendix A. Regulation 1 CCR 301-26 (2018) Rules for the Operation, Maintenance, and Inspection of School Transportation Vehicles Effective date Jan 01, 2018 ............A-1 Appendix B. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (2015) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date April 30, 2015 ................................ B-20 Appendix C. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (2007) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date September 01, 2007 .................................. C-1 Appendix D. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (1998) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date February 01, 1999 .................................. D-1 Appendix E. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (1993) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date October 01, 1993 .................................. E-1 Appendix F. Colorado Racking Load Test.............................................................. F-1 Appendix G. Glossary .................................................................................... G-1 Appendix H. Additional Resources ..................................................................... H-1 Page 3 of 361 Introduction The Colorado Department of Education (CDE) School Transportation Unit has promulgated this resource guide to assist public school districts, charter schools, as well as Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) with developing policies and procedures for the safe transportation of students. These guidelines provide manufacturer recommendations, industry standards and best practices which are consistent with the Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles, 1 CCR 301-25 and the Colorado Rules for the Operation, Maintenance and Inspection of School Transportation Vehicles 1 CCR 301-26. This publication is intended to serve as a transportation provider resource toward compliance with legislation and regulations. Acknowledgements Colorado Department of Education School Transportation Unit Jennifer Okes Chief Operating Officer [email protected] Fred Stewart Transportation Analyst [email protected] Colorado State Pupil Transportation Association (CSPTA) Fleet Service Committee Special thanks to Amanda Crissup Boulder Valley School District Transportation Brian Vasina Academy 20 School District Transportation http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation Page 4 of 361 Vehicle Inspection Program This program is established to ensure reasonable and adequate standards of safety and inspection of vehicles used to provide transportation and support student programs. The CDE Transportation Unit shall be responsible for administering and monitoring this inspection program to ensure compliance. This guide is structured to provide the information, form instruction, and criteria for operating a comprehensive Vehicle Inspection Program. Along with program requirements, this guide contains information for record keeping, forms for reporting and recording the inspections, and procedures for inspecting the various vehicle components/systems. This guide should clarify many of the gray areas that occur when operating a Vehicle Inspection Program. However, this guide will not answer all technical or interpretive questions nor will it eliminate the need for trained personnel to exercise professional judgment when performing vehicle inspections. The emphasis of ALL vehicle inspections is "SAFETY" and in every case, the districts, charter schools, certified outside inspection sites, and inspectors must exercise judgment to ensure the greatest degree of safety for vehicle operators, passengers, and other motorists. Resources used in the preparation of this guide are as follows: • 1 CCR 301-25 Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles • http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation/1ccr301-252015 National Standards for School Buses and Operations http://www.nasdpts.org/ncstonline/Documents/NCST%202015%20Specifications %20and%20Procedures%2011.1.16.pdf • Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title49-vol6/pdf/CFR-2011-title49- vol6-part571.pdf • Service and Repair Manuals from various school bus body and chassis manufacturers' • Other Industry Standards for Maintenance and Repair Procedures State Statute: Colorado law provides for the State Board of Education to adopt and enforce regulations governing the safe operation of school buses used for the transportation of students pursuant to Sections 22-51-107, 22-51-108 and 42-4- 1904 C.R.S. Inspection and Preventive maintenance requirements can be found in the following two documents: • 1 CCR 301-25 Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Page 5 of 361 Vehicles http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation/1ccr301-252015 • 1 CCR 301-26 Colorado Rules for the Operation, Maintenance and Inspection of School Transportation Vehicles http://www.sos.state.co.us/CCR/GenerateRulePdf.do?ruleVersionId=6941&fileN ame=1%20CCR%20301-26 Exemptions: 1 CCR 301-26 1.03 The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clean Buses for New York Kids How Electric School Buses Can Create Healthy Communities, Good Jobs, and Clean Rides for Kids in New York
    Clean Buses for New York Kids How Electric School Buses Can Create Healthy Communities, Good Jobs, and Clean Rides for Kids in New York By Ian Elder, Jobs to Move America Photo credit: Minnesota DOT/Flickr Clean Buses for New York Kids How Electric School Buses Can Create Healthy Communities, Good Jobs, and Clean Rides for Kids in New York By Ian Elder, Jobs to Move America TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary......................................................................................................ii Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 Section I: School Bus Services in New York.................................................................1 Section II: Economics and Performance of Electric School Buses...............................3 Section III: Funding Investments in Electric School Buses...........................................6 Section IV: Procurement of School Buses and School Bus Services ...........................9 Section V: Integrating Electric School Buses with the Grid ..........................................16 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................24 JobsToMoveAmerica.org /JobsToMoveAmerica @JobsMoveAmerica Clean Buses for New York Kids i Clean Buses for New York Kids: How Electric School Buses Can Create Healthy Communities, Good Jobs, and Clean Rides for Kids in New York By Ian Elder, Jobs to Move America Volkswagon settlement for electric school buses Executive Summary through its New York Truck Voucher Incentive Program, which will help fund up to fifty ESBs. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 2 million New York students relied on the state’s Job quality standards in automotive 46,000 school buses to get to and from school manufacturing have decreased over the last each day. The vast majority of these school several decades; at the same time, jobs in New buses are powered by diesel engines, which York school bus operations have been at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County Technical School Business Partners
    Erie County Technical School Business Partners The following is a list of businesses we have worked with in the past year. We interact with business and industry on a daily basis. As you can imagine, it changes frequently. A. Anthony & Sons A.C. Moore Accu-Cad Accuspec Electronics Action Printing and Business Forms Airgas Great Lake, Inc. Ambassador Banquet Center Ambridge Rose Spa and Salon Angelo's Beauty Supply Angelo's Transmission Art's Bakery Auto Value Parts Store Bay Valley Foods Bayfront Center for Maritime Studies Bel Aire Hotel Bella Salon and Day Spa Best Buy Better Baked Foods Bianchi Honda Bickle's Snack Foods Inc, Troyer Division Bliley Technologies Bobcat of Erie Brevillier Village Bright Beginnings C&T Electric Carlson Erie Cassidy Designs Chernichky Electric Church and Murdock Electric Circulatory Center C.J. Mele Environmental Comfort Care & Resources Inc. Community Chevrolet Contine Corporation Conway & O'Malley Goodyear Corsi Contracting Country Fair County YMCA/Albion Courtyard by Marriott Coventina Day Spa Saved on: October 22, 2015 S:\Highschool\OAC\Business Partners.docx Custom Engineering Company CyberInk LP & Go Erie Czop-Specter, Inc D&E Machine Company Danielle Designs-Kitchen and Bath Dillaman’s Auto Body Drumm & O'Harah Tool Eaton Corporation Edinboro University Elements Salon EMTA-Erie EPM Corporation Erie Business Center Erie County Dept. of Public Safety/911 Erie Institute of Technology Erie Insurance Erie Playhouse Erie Press Systems Erie Team PA CareerLink Eriez Magnetics Fairfield Inn by Marriott Family First Sports Park Fastsigns-Erie Fisher & Ludlow Fort LeBoeuf School District Frederick's Freelance Photography & Art Galbraith MediaAccess Gannon University Gary Miller Chrysler-Plymouth-Jeep General McLane School District Girard School District G.M.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Electrifying Medium-Duty Vehicles in Minnesota Capstone Paper In
    Electrifying Medium-Duty Vehicles in Minnesota Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master's Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Christov Churchward, Jacob Herbers, Ben Picone, Drew Turro Client: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Capstone Instructor: Fred Rose Date of Oral Presentation: 5/6/2019 Approval Date of Final Paper: 1 Executive Summary State of the Market Medium-duty electric vehicles (MDEVs) are still in the early stages of adoption across the U.S. Cost- parity on the initial purchase price of these vehicles relative to their conventional counterparts is not expected until the mid-2020s. A lack of organizational experience operating and maintaining EVs and a dearth of charging infrastructure present challenges to the early deployment of all types of EVs. Furthermore, most test cases for MDEVs are in California, whose warmer climate makes it difficult to draw accurate operational comparisons to Minnesota. Despite this, manufacturers are entering the market and providing a greater variety of vehicle choices. The number of class three through six (5-13 tons) electric vehicles on the market increased by a factor of six from 2013 to 2018, going from four to 24. Utilities, recognizing customer demand for EVs, are developing specialized programs and electricity rates for their customers to keep the costs of EV charging low. Furthermore, MDEVs operate with half the fuel cost per mile versus a comparable diesel vehicle. For fleet owners able and willing to take on the
    [Show full text]
  • Consult the Reporting Issuer List
    AUTORITÉ DES MARCHÉS FINANCIERS Reporting Issuers List This list is updated at the date indicated below and takes into account all documents filed on the previous date. Defaults Various default codes are used on the list of reporting issuers. The codes appear under the heading “Defaults” and refer to the Default Nomenclature below. The AMF will make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the list. However, reporting issuers should promptly contact the AMF if they do not appear on the list of reporting issuers in Québec or if they are inadvertently identified as being in default. Last update : &[Date]2021-09-24 Default Nomenclature 1a. Failure to file the annual financial statements. 1b. Failure to file the interim financial report. Failure to file the annual or interim management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) or the annual or interim 1c. management report of fund performance (MRFP). 1d. Failure to file the Annual Information Form (AIF). Failure to file the certification of annual or interim filings required by Regulation 52-109 respecting Certification of 1e. Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (“Regulation 52-109”). 1f. Failure to file the required proxy materials or the required information circular. 1g. Failure to file the issuer profile supplement on the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (SEDI). 1h. Failure to file the material change report. 1i. Failure to provide the written update after filing a confidential report of a material change. 1j. Failure to file the business acquisition report. Failure to file the annual oil and gas disclosure prescribed by Regulation 51-101 respecting Standards of Disclosure of 1k.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle List and Driver Assignments
    Effingham County Board of Education Vehicle List 6/30/2013 Vehicle List and Driver Assignments Insurance Veh# Make Year Model Cost Assigned Driver/Location Tag # Vin # Car# Book Value 940 L0163292 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15915 1HVBBACNXSH623821 151 - 941 L016393 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15916 1HVBBACN1SH623822 153 - 942 L016394 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 BB 66 15917 1HVBBACN3SH623823 152 - 944 L016396 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15918 1HVBBACN7SH623825 155 - 945 L016397 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15919 1HVBBACN9SH623826 156 - 946 L016398 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15920 1HVBBACNOSH623827 158 - 947 L016399 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15921 1HVBBACN2SH623828 157 - 951 L020327 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 BB 66 15923 1FDXB80C1SVA75535 165 - 952 L020328 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15924 1FDXB80C3SVA75536 164 - 953 L020329 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15925 1FDXB80C5SVA75537 168 - 954 L020330 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15926 1FDXB80CXSVA79843 169 - 956 L020332 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15928 1FDXB80C8SVA76228 166 - 962 L024118 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15963 1FDXB80C5VVA03628 176 - 963 L024119 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15964 1FDXB80C7VVA03629 175 - 964 L024117 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 54 15965 1FDXB80C3VVA03627 177 - 965 L024116 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 54 15966 1FDXB80C1VVA03626 178 - 970 L028102 1997 97 INT 44,597.30 Spare BB 66 16029 1HVBBABN8VH496962 181 - 971 L028103 1997 97 INT 44,597.30 Spare BB 66 16048 1HVBBABNXVH496963 182 - 973 L028105
    [Show full text]
  • IC Bus Charging Fundamentals
    September 16, 2020 Introduction by Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition Grant Updates Santa Barbara County APCD SLO County APCD Central Coast Community Energy Update Electric School Bus Presentations The Lion Electric Company A-Z Bus Sales BusWest Creative Bus Sales Q&A Session • C5 is a group of local stakeholders whose mission is to expand the use of alternative fuel vehicles and fueling infrastructure in Santa Barbara and SLO Counties • Part of National Clean Cities Program • C-5.org Alternative & Renewable Fuels Fuel Economy Vehicle Trip • Biodiesel • Fuel efficient vehicles Elimination • Driving habits • Electricity • Telecommuting • Vehicle maintenance • Ridesharing • Ethanol (E85) • Biking • Hydrogen Idle Reduction • Walking • Natural gas • Technologies • Behavioral changes • Propane Alex Economou Coordinator Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition (C5) (805) 961-8894 [email protected] ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/lowincomemapfull.htm https://www.ourair.org/clean-air-grants-for-buses/ Application Internal Grant Offer Signed Internal Grant Submission Review (if eligible) Offer Review Execution After Grant Execution: Bus Post Bus Reimburse Annual Delivery Purchase Inspection Salvage ment Reports SCHOOL BUS INCENTIVES The SLO County APCD School Bus Incentive Program provides funding for replacement or retrofit of public school buses County-wide public school bus fleet numbers more than 200 Since 2001, SLO County APCD has administered $5.9 million in grants for local school districts – including 75 retrofits, 43 replacements, 3 repowers NEW E-BUS = $400K + FUNDING: APPROX. $200K FROM SLO APCD SLO COUNTY APCD AVAILABLE FUNDS AB 617 CAP Incentive funding available for projects in low- income communities; amount TBD; application period is October – November.
    [Show full text]
  • BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER National School Bus Safety Week Puts Spotlight on the Safest Form of Student Transportation
    News Release For further information, please contact: Barbara Gould or Ken Kesegich Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC Marcus Thomas LLC (440) 329-9609 (888) 482-4455 [email protected] [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER National School Bus Safety Week Puts Spotlight on the Safest Form of Student Transportation ELYRIA, Ohio – Oct. 22, 2019 – The National Association for Pupil Transportation (NAPT) has its eyes on a school year free of student transportation fatalities – and advanced vehicle safety technologies are a key to reaching that goal. Bendix (Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC and Bendix Spicer Foundation Brake LLC) is proud to work with school districts and vehicle manufacturers across North America in pursuit of safer student transportation as NAPT marks National School Bus Safety Week Oct. 21-25. The theme of this year’s National School Bus Safety Week is “My School Bus – The Safest Form of Student Transportation.” The theme reflects National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data showing that the classic yellow school bus is 70 times safer than walking, bicycling, or riding in a passenger car or light truck to and from school. “Even so, a single school bus collision is one too many,” said TJ Thomas, director of marketing and customer solutions – Controls, at Bendix, the North American leader in the development and manufacture of intelligent, integrated active safety, air management, and braking solutions for commercial vehicles. “Bendix and all its industry partners are working tirelessly to help keep student passengers safe, and to support the school bus drivers who oversee their daily travels.” -more- BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS by MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008
    Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS BY MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008 MANUFACTURER RECALLS VEHICLES ACCUBUIL T, INC 1 8 AM GENERAL CORPORATION 1 980 AMERICAN EAGLE MOTORCYCLE CO 1 14 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO 8 212,212 AMERICAN SUNDIRO MOTORCYCLE 1 2,183 AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORP. 4 25,023 AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORP. 5 1,441 APRILIA USA INC. 2 409 ASTON MARTIN 2 666 ATHEY PRODUCTS CORP. 3 304 B. FOSTER & COMPANY, INC. 1 422 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE 11 28,738 BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY 12 62,692 BUELL MOTORCYCLE CO 4 12,230 CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC. 1 818 CARPENTER INDUSTRIES, INC. 2 6,838 CLASSIC LIMOUSINE 1 492 CLASSIC MANUFACTURING, INC. 1 8 COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC. 8 5,271 COACHMEN RV COMPANY 1 576 COLLINS BUS CORPORATION 1 286 COUNTRY COACH INC 6 519 CRANE CARRIER COMPANY 1 138 DABRYAN COACH BUILDERS 1 723 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 30 6,700,752 DAMON CORPORATION 3 824 DAVINCI COACHWORKS, INC 1 144 D'ELEGANT CONVERSIONS, INC. 1 34 DORSEY TRAILERS, INC. 1 210 DUTCHMEN MANUFACTURING, INC 1 105 ELDORADO NATIONAL 1 173 ELECTRIC TRANSIT, INC. 1 54 ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 1 40 E-ONE, INC. 1 3 EUROPA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2 242 EXECUTIVE COACH BUILDERS 1 702 FEATHERLITE LUXURY COACHES 1 83 FEATHERLITE, INC. 2 3,235 FEDERAL COACH, LLC 1 230 FERRARI NORTH AMERICA 8 1,601 FLEETWOOD ENT., INC. 5 12, 119 FORD MOTOR COMPANY 60 7,485,466 FOREST RIVER, INC. 1 115 FORETRAVEL, INC. 3 478 FOURWINNS 2 2,276 FREIGHTLINER CORPORATION 27 233,032 FREIGHTLINER LLC 1 803 GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Proposition Date: February 3, 2016 Cc: Board of Education, Mark Premo
    INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DR. JIM HOFFMAN, SUPERINTENDENT FROM: MICHAEL OUIMET, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR BUSINESS SUBJECT: BUS REPLACEMENT PLAN/BUS PROPOSITION DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2016 CC: BOARD OF EDUCATION, MARK PREMO I am recommending the district seek voter approval on May 17, 2016, to spend $749,044 to purchase eight (8) new transportation vehicles in alignment with the District’s bus replacement schedule. This schedule of bus replacements was recommended in the district’s transportation study completed in the Fall of 2010 by Transportation Advisory Services (TAS). Please see attached, the “Fleet” section of this report for your reference. The School Bus Proposition breaks down as follows: • $673,590: purchase of six, 65-passenger school buses @ $112,265 per bus • $100,254: for the purchase of two, 28-passenger school buses @ $50,127 per bus $773,844 ($24,800) Less: Trades of $24,800 for eight (8) buses. $749,044 Please see attached, the proposed specifications for the vehicles recommended to be purchased. TAS recommends a consistent replacement plan, requiring a bus purchase vote each year, because an annual replacement plan of the existing fleet helps the district to maintain student safety and control repair and maintenance costs on older buses. A well thought out bus replacement plan is more cost effective and enables the district to consolidate routes and adjust its fleet as needed year to year. The replacement plan will also support continuation of the District’s excellent safety record with the New York State Department of Transportation. Please find attached a current profile of the district’s bus fleet, including a projected replacement schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS and PROCEDURES
    NATIONAL SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS and PROCEDURES 2005 Revised Edition Adopted by: THE FOURTEENTH NATIONAL CONGRESS ON SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION Central Missouri State University Warrensburg, Missouri May 15-19, 2005 Co-Sponsored by: National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services National Association for Pupil Transportation National School Transportation Association School Transportation Section, National Safety Council School Bus Manufacturers Technical Council Missouri Safety Center, Central Missouri State University This publication is available from: Missouri Safety Center Central Missouri State University Humphreys Suite 201 Warrensburg, MO 64093 Phone: (660) 543-4830 Fax: (660) 543-4482 iii iv v Infants / Toddlers and Pre-school Children ..................................................................................165 Transportation Services for Pre-school Children with Disabilities .................................168 vi vii viii FOREWORD The 2005 National Congress on School Transportation was the latest in a series beginning in 1939 and continuing in 1945, 1948, 1951, 1954, 1959, 1964, 1970, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000. All congresses (referred to as “conferences” before 2005) have been made up of offi cial representatives of state departments of education, public safety, motor vehicles, and police or other state agencies having state-wide responsibilities for the administration of student transportation; local school district personnel; contract operators; advisors from industry; and representatives from other interested professional organizations and groups. Each conference has resulted in one or more publications that contain the recommendations of that particular conference. The recommendation of specifi cations and procedures for school buses and their operation has been a major purpose of all conferences. The 1939 Conference was called for this sole purpose and formulated a set of recommended standards for school buses of 20 or more passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D-2 Item (Specify): 1(F)(4); 2(E)(4), 6(E)(2); 6(E)(4); 9(C)(1)
    BENEFICIARY ELIGIBLE MITIGATION ACTION CERTIFICATION Beneficiary Cherokee Nation Lead Agency Authorized to Act on Behalf of the Beneficiary: Office of the Secretary of Natural Resources (Any authorized person with delegation of such authority to direct the Trustee delivered to the Trustee pursuant to a Delegation of Authority and Certificate of Incumbency) Action Title: Cherokee Nation’s 4th Round Zero Emission Project Beneficiary’s Project ID: Cherokee Nation’s 4th Round Zero Emission Project Funding Request No. 4 (sequential) Request Type: ☐ Reimbursement X Advance (select one or ☐ Other (specify): Paymentmore) to be made to: X Beneficiary (select one or more) ☐ Other (specify): Funding Request & X Attached to this Certification Direction (Attachment A) ☐ To be Provided Separately SUMMARY Eligible Mitigation Action X Appendix D-2 item (specify): 1(f)(4); 2(e)(4), 6(e)(2); 6(e)(4); 9(c)(1) Action Type ☐ Item 10 - DERA Option (5.2.12) (specify and attach Detailed Description of Mitigation DERA Action Proposal): Item Including Community and Air Quality Benefits (5.2.2): Please see Exhibit 1 attached hereto Estimate of Anticipated NOx Reductions (5.2.3): Please see Exhibit 2 attached hereto Identification of Governmental Entity Responsible for Reviewing and Auditing Expenditures of Eligible Mitigation Action Funds to Ensure Compliance with Applicable Law (5.2.7.1): Cherokee Nation Financial Resources Describe how the Beneficiary will make documentation publicly available (5.2.7.2). Please see Exhibit 3 attached hereto Describe any cost share requirement to be placed on each NOx source proposed to be mitigated (5.2.8). Not applicable Describe how the Beneficiary complied with subparagraph 4.2.8, related to notice to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Bird. a Heritage of Looking Ahead. 2015 Annual Report PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 C
    PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 PC (100C 57M 0Y 38K) PANTONE 541 PC (100C 57M 0Y 38K) C=100 M=51 Y=0 K=31 (From Marketing) C=100 M=51 Y=0 K=31 (From Marketing) Blue Bird. A heritage of looking ahead. 2015 Annual Report PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 C PANTONE 541 PC (100C 57M 0Y 38K) PANTONE 541 PC (100C 57M 0Y 38K) C=100 M=51 Y=0 K=31 (From Marketing) C=100 M=51 Y=0 K=31 (From Marketing) WHAT WE STAND FOR We come to work every day with one common goal—to design, build, sell and service the world’s finest school bus. That’s what we do—no distractions, no competing priorities. We are heirs to a rich legacy, one of listening to our customers, embracing their needs, and delivering innovations that lead the market. We commit ourselves to four driving priorities— safety, quality, durability and serviceability. We embody the interests of every child that rides us, every driver that drives us, every service technician that services us and every district that buys us. More than a business, this work is our heritage, and we have been at it since 1927—that’s purpose driven. BLUE BIRD’S ICONIC HISTORY Blue Bird #1 Built by Company Founder Albert L. Luce Sr. 1927 1937 First All-Steel Body School Bus 1948 First All American Forward Engine Bus 1951 First All American on Proprietary Chassis 1957 1975 Redesign of Conventional Bus First Micro Bird® 1957 1967 1988 Construction Upgrade of First TC2000 Type D Bus of Current Conventional Bus Manufacturing Facility 88 YEARS OF INNOVATION SOLD OVER 550,000 BUSES SINCE 1927 2013 2015 First Sigma Type D First
    [Show full text]