Community Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project

Safeguards Due Diligence Report

Project Number: 47084-002 March 2021

Indonesia: Community Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project

For Sintang and Kapuas Hulu districts, West Kalimantan Province

Prepared by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry for the Asian Development Bank. This safeguards due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ABBREVIATION

ADB Asian Development Bank ANR Assisted Natural Regeneration BPHP Balai Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi BPSKL Balai Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan CBE Community Based Ecotourism CBFM Community Based Forest Management EA Executing Agency FIP Forest Investment Program FMU Forest Management Unit GRM Grievance Redress Mechanisms IP Indigenous People IPP Indigenous People Plan KMHA Kesatuan Masyarakat Adat M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MHA Masyarakat Hukum Adat MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forestry NTFP Non-Timber Forest Product PCU Project Coordinator Unit PDD Project Design Document PJLHK Pemanfaatan Jasa lingkungan Hutan Konservasi PMU Project Management Unit PISU Project Implementation Supporting Unit Poskedes Pos Kesehatan Desa Posyandu Pos Pelayanan Terpadu PTHI PT Hatfield Indonesia REDD+ Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation SFM Sustainable Forest Management ToR Terms of Reference TNBKDS Taman Nasional Betung Kerihun dan Danau Sentarum CONTENTS

Abbreviations i Contents ii List of Tables iii List of Figures v List of Appendix vi CHAPTER I: BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Due diligence (DDR) or Masyarakat Hukum Adat (MHA) Due Diligence Report 2 3. The Scope 2 4. Limitation 2 5. Methodology 2 6. The ADB Policy Statement on Indigenous People (IP) 2 7. The IP under ADB SPS 3 8. Indonesia Policy on IP 3 9. National Regulation for MHA 4 10. Project Description 4 CHAPTER II: SOCIAL ECONOMY IN THE PROJECT AREA 13 1. Population 13 2. Education and Health Facility 14 3. Certified Teacher and Medical Support 14 4. Illiterate People 15 5. Public Facility 15 6. Clean water and Sanitation 16 7. Electricity 17 8. Energy for Daily Cooking 18 9. Livelihood and Income 18 10. Poverty 19 11. Subsistence hunting community 20 12. Social Capital 20 13. Summary of Social Economic of Villages in the Project area 22 CHAPTER III: PROJECT PROGRESS IMPLEMENTATION 23 1. Project Introduction and Consultation and Participation 23 2. Estimated Affected Community (AC) 25 3. Progress of activities under Output No. 1: Community-focused and gender responsive REDD+ pilots in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts implemented 27 4. Progress of activities under Output No. 2: REDD+ Strategy in West Kalimantan effectively implemented 51 5. Progress of activities under Output No. 3: Sub-national Fiscal Policies on REDD+ Harmonized with National Policy 52 6. Information dissemination 52 7. Grievance and Redress (GRM) 53 8. Summary of the Project Achievement 42 CHAPTER IV. GAP ANALYSIS 53 CHAPTER V. THE ACHIEVEMENT AND PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION 74 1. Project Achievement 74 2. Proposed Corrective Action 75 LIST OF TABLE

Table 1.1 The tree project’s output and the associated programs8 6 Table 1.2 Location of FIP-I project in District of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang 6 Table 1.3 Program and activities of FIP-I that have possible impact (+/-) toward the MHA1 11 Table 2.1 Population demography and education according to village in project area in 2020 13 Table 2.2 Number of Education and health facility according to village in project area in 2020 14 Table 2.3 Number of certified teacher, doctors and paramedic assigned in villages in the project area in 2020 15 Table 2.4 Number of public facilities according to village in the project area in 2020 16 Table 2.5 Percentage of House Hold using various of clean water and sanitation type according to village in project area in 2020 17 Table 2.6 Number of HH within the village that has electricity in the project area in 2020 18 Table 2.7 Number of Household using various energy sources for cooking according to village in the project area 19 Table 2.8 Number of poor people according to village in the project area 2015-2019 (HH) 20 Table 2.9 House Hold whose regularly hunting for their subsistence according to village in the project area 21 Table 2.10 Social Capital and Cultural Heritage remain in place and well maintained according to village in project area in 2020 21 Table 2.11 Summary of Social economic status of the 17 in the project area 22 Table 3.1 Project introduction and consultation with relevant stakeholders in 2019-2020 23 Table 3.2 Number of affected and participated MHA -HH in the Project area 25 Table 3.3 Agroforestry Program according to district and village in the project area in 2019- 2020 32 Table 3.4 ANR Program according to district and village in the project area in 2019-2020 33 Table 3.5 CBFM Program according to district and village in the project area in 2019-2020 35 Table 3.6 Forest Fires Prevention and Management Programs according to village in District of Kapuas Hulu- Fire in 2018-2020 37 Table 3.7 Beekeeping Program according to district and village in the project area in 2018 - 2020 38 Table 3.8 Handicraft Program according to district and village in the project area in 2018-2020 40 Table 3.9 Aquaculture Program according to district and village in the project area in 2018-2020 41 Table 3.10 Home Garden Program according to district and village in the project area in 2019- 2020 41 Table 3.11 Micro-hydro construction according to district and villages in the project area in 2019- 2020 43 Table 3.12 Solar cell installation according to district and villages in the project area in district of Sintang in 2019-2020 45 Table 3.13 Construction of Clean Water Facility according to district and village in the project area 2019-2020 46 Table 3.14 Construction of track lines and boardwalk in the project area in district of Kapuas Hulu 46 Table 3.15 Workshop and training of REDD+ awareness and green school curriculum development addressed to the MHAs in the project area in 2019-2020 49 Table 3.16 Investment of fish drying and woven device to the MHAs in the project area in 2019 -2020 50

Table 3.17 Capacity building, coordination meeting and drafting regulations related to REDD+ for the West Kalimantan provincial officer which took placed in Pontianak in 2019- 2020 51 Table 3.18 Workshop and coordination meeting related to fiscal harmonization associated with REDD+ in Pontianak took placed in 2019 -2020 52 Table 3.19 Model of information dissemination of the project 53 Table 3.20 Grievance and Redress Mechanism (GRM) under Output 1 of the project 54 Table 4.1 Gap analysis of the project; Community-Focused Investment to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation in the province of West Kalimantan 56

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 1.1 Location of FIP 1-Project in districts of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang, West Kalimantan 7 Figure 1.2 Structure of Institutional Arrangement of the FIP-I. Community Focused Investment to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project8 12 Figure 1.3 Organization structure of PISU -FIP-1 Community -Focused Investment to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project 12 Figure 3.1 Lunching of FIP-1 by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry and ADB Director in May 2018 (top), Kick off and exhibition of FIP-1 in Pontianak (middle) and FIP-1 Project Introduction and consultation in the village of Tanjung 26 Figure 3.2 FIP-1 worjshio on agroforestry, ANR and CBFM (top), farmer group discussion on agroforestry (middle) and area of agroforestry (bottom) 28 Figure 3.3 FPIC and GRM introductions related to Land-based programs in the villages of Tanjung lasa in October 2018 (top), Batu lintang in January 2019 (middle) and Selaup in April 2019 (bottom) 29 Figure 3.4 FIP-1 agroforestry program started in December 2019 has produced fruitful results in the village of Sungai Uluk Palin, district of Kapuas Hulu 31 Figure 3.5 ANR area in the village of Nanga Betung (top), monitoring ANR in the village of Nanga Sangan and patrolling CBFM area through the natural boundary-river un the village of Nanga Lauk (bottom). 34 Figure 3.6 Photo session of the MPA of Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park, following their training 37 Figure 3.7 Kanvas Model FIP-1 farmer group process discussion related to livelihood (top), creating organic fertilizer for home garden program (middle) and freshwater aquaculture in the village of Nanga Lauk (bottom). 39 Figure 3.8 Woven-training for women engages with the FIP-1 Project in the province of West Kalimantan 40 Figure 3.9 Making commercial handicraft in the village of Kayu Dujung (top), home garden in the village of Tanjung Lasa (bottom left) and harvesting honeybees from the beekeeping program in the village of Senangan Kecil (bottom right) 42 Figure 3.10 Toilets for ecotourism program in Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park (top), road for agroforestry access (2nd top), boardwalk crossing P. Majang (3rd top) and ecotourism and information center being constructed in Danau Sentarum (bottom). 44 Figure 3.11 FPIC and GRM consultations for three programs; Clean water facility in the village of Nanga Lauk (top), Micro-hydro in the village of Tanjung Lokang (middle) and Solar panel (bottom) 47 Figure 3.12 Construction of pipe for clean water facility in the village of Tanjung Lasa (top), reconstruction of Som-micro-hydro at the village of Tanjung Lokang (2nd top), installment of Solar panel in the village of Radin Jaya (3rd top) and construction of School building in the village of Tanjaung Sari (bottom). 48 Figure 3.13 FIP-1 Green School training in the village of P. Majang. 50 Figure 3.14 Workshop on Fiscal related to REDD+ was held in Jakarta on 12-13 August 2019 53 Figure 3.15 Organization structure and mechanism of GRM of the FIP I- Project 54

LIST OF APPENDIX

Appendix 1. Dossier of FPIC related to project introduction and GRM in a number of villages in the project areas (Berita Acara Konsultasi Bermakna untuk pengenalan proyek FIP- 1 di beberapa desa di wilayah kerja Proyek FIP-1) 80 Appendix 2. FPIC of the project in Desa Vega, District of Kapuas Hulu on 4 September 2018 86 Appendix 3. Minute of Meeting on Social Forestry-Community Based Forest Management 93 Appendix 4. Copy of Surat Perjanjian Kerjasama (SPKS) antara Balai Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan Wilayah Kalimantan dan Kelompok Adang Makmur (Partnership Agreement between BPSKL -Implementing Agency and Farmer Group of Adang Makmur related to integration of their (occupied) land into agroforestry program) 96 Appendix 5 Example of information materials (leaflet) disseminated to community and public 100 Appendix 6. GRM Form for reporting grievance to the head of village or PISU officer of the Project FIP 1 Community-Focused Investment to Address deforestation and Forest Degradation 103 Appendix 6. Schematic of GRM Procedure of the FIP-1. Community-Focused Investment to (continued) address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project 104 Appendix 6 Mekanisme/ Prosedur Penyelesaian Pengaduan FIP-1- GRM Procedure and (continued) Mechanisms

CHAPTER I: BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. Introduction

Forest Investment Program 1 (FIP-I) is the grant from the Climate Investment Fund channeled to Asian Development Bank (ADB) to support Indonesia government to implement climate change program through the scheme of REDD+1 2. The FIP -I Project, herein after called as the Project, is complemented with other FIP project in Indonesia, FIP II administered by the World Bank (WB) and FIP III is administered by International Finance Corporation (IFC), which has similar objectives and operates in a number of provinces in Indonesia3.

The project which received grant of US$ 17 million is dedicated to support REDD+ program in the province of West Kalimantan with the title of Community Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation. The project was designed to assist the government of Indonesia in particular the province of West Kalimantan in (i) improving sustainable forest management (SFM)4 and REDD+ at local level, (ii) ensure the REDD+ concept is effectively implemented and (iii) harmonize fiscal and mechanism policy derived from REED+5.

The project was signed by the government of Indonesia, the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MoEF) and ADB on 26 October 2016 set to implement for five year period. Due to bureaucracy procedure at both the MoEF and ADB the project was only able to start in early 20186. At the implementation level, the project has been contracted to PT Hatfield Indonesia (PTHI) supervised by the Directorate General of Social Forestry and Environment Partnership (Direktorat Jenderal Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan- PSKL) as the Executing Agency7 .

To ensure that the project will be implemented in accordance to the Ministry mission and programs, the project has set up the Project Implementation Support Unit (PISU) which consist of key experts related to REDD+, cros-cutting experts (safeguard, gender and monitoring-evaluation), and financial-admin team. The PISU team provide support to Implementing Agency, which consist of the Directorate of BUPSHA, Directorate of KPHP, and the Directorate of PJLHK at the national level. At the provincial level, there are three Implementing Units, i.e., The Office of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnership (BPSKL) for Kalimantan Region, Office of Production Forest Management Unit (BPHP) Area VIII in Pontianak, and the National Park of Betung Kerihun Danau Sentarum (TNBKDS) in Kapuas Hulu. At the project site, three FMUs are project partners, which consist of FMU North Sintang, FMU North Kapuas Hulu and the FMU

1 Document of Republic of Indonesia-ADB on Project Administration Manual for the Project of Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project issued on August 2016. 2 REDD+ is the effort of countries to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and foster conservation, sustainable management of forests, and enhancement of forest carbon stocks. The concept was first negotiated in Warsaw, Poland at the Conference of Parties (COP) 5 under the United Nation Framework Convention of Climate Change (UNFCCC). REDD+ was adopted in COP 13 in December 2007 in Bali, Indonesia. 3 Program Investasi Kehutanan Proyek II. https://ebfip2.menlhk.go.id. Downloaded on 2 December 2020. 4 Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is the management of forests according to the principles of sustainable development. SFM has to keep the balance between three main pillars; ecological, economic and socio-cultural. SFM will provide integrated benefits to all, ranging from safeguarding local livelihoods to protecting biodiversity and ecosystem services, reducing rural poverty and mitigating the effect of climate change. FMU was adopted in Forest Principle. UNCED 1992. 5 Forest Investment Program 1. https://www.fip1-adb.com/about-fip1/. Downloaded on 2 December 2020. 6 Kick off Meeting FIP 1, Momentum Mempercepat dan Memperlancar Forest Investment Program di Kalimantan Barat. http://ksdae.menlhk.go.id/info/3617/kick-off-meeting-fip-1,-momentum-mempercepat-dan-memperlancar-forest-investment- program-di-kalimantan-barat.html. Downloaded on 8 December 2020. 7 Contract Agreement between the Directorate General of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnership of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry and PT Hatfield Indonesia No. K.01 / BUPSHA-3 / PPK / FIP1 / 2017.

South Kapuas Hulu. There are a total of 17 villages within those FMUs and the TNBKDS that will receive the benefit of this Project1.

2. Due diligence (DDR) or Masyarakat Hukum Adat (MHA) Due Diligence Report

This document is a due diligence report of social safeguard related to MHA of the project which cover the period of January 2018 until December 2020. The report was written upon the guidance of ADB SPS 2009. It presents a process of verification and gap assessment and proposed corrective actions to ensure that the project activities related to the MHAs were implemented in accordance to the guidance.

3. The Scope

The Document outlines the project implementation within the period of January 2018 to December 2020 in the project area which covers of 17 villages within the districts of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang of the province of West Kalimantan. It features (i) project objectives, programs and activities, (ii) project locations, (iii) institutional arrangement, (iv) social-economy of the villages where project operates, (v) information disclosure and GRM, (vi) the progress related to MHA and (vii) gap analysis and proposed corrective actions.

4. Limitation

The document performed with several limitations due to the issues of Covid 19 pandemic which precluded opportunity to have an engagement with stakeholders at the field levels. To address these limitations, most of information derives from secondary data collected from field officers (village facilitators), project or PISU office in Bogor and on line statistical data of sub-district level, where available.

5. Methodology

The document was developed based on desk studies of the project documents available in the PISU office. As mentioned earlier, due to the pandemic issue there was no opportunity to visit and collect data from the EA in the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MoEF). Nonetheless, a number of on line meetings and discussions with PISU officers in the EA, province and districts were fortunately carried out.

6. The ADB Policy Statement on Indigenous People (IP)

The ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009 on IP is clearly stated that project shall be designed and implemented to ensure full respect for IP identity, dignity, human right, livelihood systems and cultural uniqueness as they define them. By that definition IP shall (i) receive proper culturally, social and economic benefits, (ii) not suffer adverse impact derived from the project and (iii) allow active participation of the project that may affect them8 9.

8 Indigenous People Safeguard 2013. A Planning and Implementation Good Practice Source Book. Working Document. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/documents/indigenous-peoples-safeguards-planning-and-implementation-good- practice-sourcebook. Downloaded on 4 December 2020 9 Indigenous People Planning Framework. Republic Indonesia: Community Focused Investment to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project. Document No. 47084, published June 2016. https://www.adb.org/documents/indigenous-peoples- safeguards-planning-and-implementation-good-practice-sourcebook. Downloaded 4 December 2020.

(KMHA)10 11 or Masyarakat Hukum Adat (MHA) 12 13 14, though the definition might not completely similar. This Indonesian term for IP is adopted by Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN)15. To ensure that the definition is in line with the Indonesia Law, this report uses the term of MHA instead of IP. Furthermore, in accordance to Forestry Law the MHA should have the following criteria.

7. The IP under ADB SPS

ADB has been consistently applying IP safeguards in developing and implementing project that may affect IP. In this context the bank defines the IP as generic sense which refer to a distinct, vulnerable, social and cultural group keeping four characteristics below in various level 16.

a. Self-identification as members of a distinct indigenous cultural group and recognition of this identity by others; b. Collective attachment to geographically distinct habitats or ancestral territories in the project area and to the natural resources in these habitats and territories; c. Customary, cultural, economic, social, or political institutions that are separate from those of the dominant society and culture; and d. A distinct language, often different from the official language of the country or region.

8. Indonesia Policy on IP

The term of IP has not clearly recognized by Indonesia government. There are still contradictory statement of IP terminology among the Indonesian. It is indeed Indonesia signatory to United Nations Declaration of the Right of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). However, the country reserved the concept of IP as all Indonesia, with the exception of the ethnic Chinese, are IP and thus entitled to the same rights. Thus, the country has rejected call for specific needs by groups identifying themselves as indigenous 17,18.

10 Article No. 18 B point (2) of National Constitutional 1945. https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/7014/2889/4255/Masyarakat_Adat_di_Indonesia- Menuju_Perlindungan_Sosial_yang_Inklusif.pdf. Downloaded on 2 December 2020. 11 Act No. 32 of 2004 concerning Local Government. https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/7014/2889/4255/Masyarakat_Adat_di_Indonesia- Menuju_Perlindungan_Sosial_yang_Inklusif.pdf Downloaded on 2 December 2020 12 Act No. 5 of 1967 concerning Basic Regulation On Agrarian Principles. http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/ins3920.pdf. Downloaded on 2 December 2020. 13 Ac No. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry. http://pkgppkl.menlhk.go.id/v0/undang-undang-no-41-tahun-1999-tentang- kehutanan/. Downloaded on 2 December 2020. 14 Constitutional Court Decree (Keputusan Mahkamah Konsitusi) No 35/PUUX/2012, Adopted on 16 May 2013. https://www.aman.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/putusan_sidang_35-PUU-2012-Kehutanan-telah-ucap-16-Mei-2013.pdf. Downloaded on 2 December 2020. 15 Masyarakat Adat Perlu Mendapat Perlakuan Khusus Dari Negara. http://www.aman.or.id/2013/06/masyarakat-adat-perlu- mendapat-perlakuan-khusus-dari-negara/. Downloaded on 2 December 2020. 16 Building Country Safeguard System. Briefing Note No. 4. Safeguarding Indigenous People through Strengthening Country Safeguard Systems. 50 Years ADB. Asian Development Bank, 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila. Philippines. 2016. https://www.adb.org/documents/indigenous-peoples-safeguards-planning-and-implementation-good- practice-sourcebook. Downloaded 4 December 2020. 17 Indigenous People in Indonesia. IWGIA. https://www.iwgia.org/en/indonesia.html. Downloaded on 2 December 2020. 18 Joint Stakeholders’ Submission on The Situation of Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Indonesia. 2017. Paper Submitted by organizations Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN) to the 3rdCycle of Universal Periodic Review of Indonesia27thSession of the Human Rights Council Apr-May 2017

On the contrary, the Government has been using the term ‘indigenous peoples’ in several official documents and reports published in English i.e., the Letter of Intent between the Norwegian and Indonesian Governments for cooperation on REDD,” signed on 26 May 201019, the Forest Investment Program-PAM (FIP-1) 20161, and the 5th National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity in 201520. In Indonesia term, the IP could be translated as Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat.

a. It should be organized under communal system in the form of Paguyuban, traditional union; b. It should have a customary institutional arrangement; c. It should have clear customary land area; d. It should have well-functioning customary law and adat Judicial system; and e. It is still collecting of natural resource from the nearby forest for their subsistence.

9. National Regulation for MHA

Despite the controversial issue of the IP definition, the Indonesia government completely respect the right of MHA and its access to the natural living resources as long as is not contradictory with the national law11. The recognition toward the MHA right is reflected in the following policy and regulations and among others are:

a. Act No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles (or Basic Agrarian Law, BAL), Article 2 Para. 4, Article 3, and 5 which recognize MHA land right, and law; b. Act No. 41/1999 on Forestry, Article 34 and 67 including the explanations related to MHA right and access to forest area; c. Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/2012, which was officially enacted on 16 May 2013 regarding the status of adat forest. d. Ministry of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. P17/MenLHK/Setjen/Kum1./8/2020 pertaining Customary Forest and Right of Forest; e. The State Ministry of Agrarian Regulation No. 5 of 1999 guidance for conflict resolution related to MHA; f. Presidential Decree No. 111/ 1999 pertaining Community Empowerment for MHA in remote are; g. Act No. 23 of 2014 pertaining Local Government which recognize MHA and its customary law; and h. Act No. 6 of 2014 pertaining Village which recognize Villages of MHA.

10. Project Description a. Lead Agent

The project primarily deals with (i) climate change in particular those related to reducing emission from the forestry sector, (ii) sustainable forest management and (iii) improving economic capacity of forest dependent community. Hence, the lead agent of this project laid in the Ministry of Environment and Forestry.

19 Copy of the Letter of Intent between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on “Cooperation on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation”. http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/05/28/norway-indonesia-forest-deal-us1-billion-dollars-worth- of-continued-deforestation/. Downloaded on 2 December 2020. 20The 5th National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2015 https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/id/id- nr-05-en.pdf. Downloaded on 2 December 2020.

b. ADB Category

As indicated in the IPPF document No. 47084 published on June 201, in relation to MHA, the project is categorized A which means that the project requires to present an Indigenous People Plan (IPP) and social impact assessment (SIA)21. c. Objective of the project

The objective of the project is assisting the government in particular the province of West Kalimantan in facing (i) climate change in forestry sector by establishing a number of pilot projects of REDD+ at local level, (ii) providing capacity building in various themes such as community based agroforestry and sustainable forest management (SFM), ecosystem services and livelihood options and improvement capacity for both institutions and local community and (iii) fiscal policy synchronization with central government related to REDD+ financial outcome1. d. Purpose of the Due Diligence Report

The aim of developing the Due Diligent Report (DDR) is to get a clear pictures of how the project has been implemented, to figure out whether there are gaps between the planning and the implementation and to ensure that in the future the project will perform in accordance to the agreed Masyarakat Hukum Adat Planning Framework (MHAPF), dated June 2016 and the ADB SPS’s safeguard requirement on IP (2009). e. Projects’ Programs

The project has been designed to deliver three outputs (i) REDD+ at community level in districts of Sintang and Kapuas Hulu, (ii) REDD+ effectively implemented in the province and (iii) capacity building programs for empowering local government and the community (Table 1.1). f. Project Period

As indicated in the project document, the project has a period of five years starting in June 2017 up to June 2022. During the Mid Term Review in December 2020, MOEF proposed a project extension for one year until June 2023. Bappenas has agreed on this extension with the letter to the Ministry of Finance No. 02834 /D.8/03/2021 dated on March 12, 2021 1,8. g. Location

Upon the latest amendment issued in ADB Memorandum22 and ADB No- Objection Letter on the changes in the project villages23 the project will operate in 17 villages covering almost 700,000 ha located in two districts; Kapuas hulu and Sintang which both under the governmental of the province of West Kalimantan. There are four villages located under the management of Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park, the remaining villages area are under FMU administrative which laid both in and outside forest area. The later legally known as Area Penggunaan Lain (Table 1.2) and Fig. 1.1.

21ADB Safeguard Policy Statement. 2009. ADB Policy Paper. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional- document/32056/safeguard-policy-statement-june2009.pdf. Downloaded on 7 January 2021. 22 ADB Memorandum Southeast Asia Department, Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture Division. Issued 4 April 2019. Unpublished document. 23 Fax Letter from the ADB’s Director of Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture Division, Southeast Asia Department related to Non Objection Letter for the proposed changes in the project villages, issued in 9 April 2019

Table 1.1. The tree project’s output and the associated programs8

Project Programs according to Outputs Output No. 1 Output No. 2 Output No. 3 No (Mainly for IP in the (Designated for relevant (Designated for relevant project area) government officers) government officers) 1 Community-based Capacity building of REDD+ and Harmonization of sub-national agroforestry the associated skills regulation on REDD+ with national fiscal policy 2 ANR Capacity building of SFM, Preparation of provincial carbon accounting and land- regulation on benefit sharing planning mechanism, fiscal policy and incentive 3 CBFM Capacity building of Ecosystem Gender responsive proposal services for mobilization of additional fund 4 Livelihood Capacity building of benefit sharing 5 Forest Fire Prevention and FPIC procedure and Management mechanisms 6 Community-based GRM procedure and Ecotourism mechanisms 7 Small-scale infrastructures Exchange study of REDD+ implementation 8 Capacity building for local community related to green school curriculum and REDD+

Table 1.2. Location of FIP-I project in District of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang

AREA (Ha) DISTRICT SUB DISTRICT VILLAGES Forest Area Non-Forest (APL) Kapuas FMU Kapuas Hulu Utara Unit XIX KPHL Hulu Embaloh Hilir Nanga Lauk 11,505 2,217 Embaloh Hulu Batu Lintang 14,855 1,034 Putussibau Utara Sungai Uluk Palin 29,887 1,475 Tanjung Lasa 175,678 2,307 FMU Kapuas Hulu Selatan Unit XXI KPHP Bunut Hulu Selaup 6,843 4,402 Boyan Tanjung Nanga Betung 3,761 552 Nanga Sangan 1,029 2,464 Mentebah Tanjung 14,390 3 Betung Karihun and Danau Sentarum National Park

AREA (Ha) DISTRICT SUB DISTRICT VILLAGES Forest Area Non-Forest (APL) Putussibau Selatan Bungan Jaya 254,661 - Tanjung Lokang 109,588 - Selimbau Vega 11,760 19 Badau Pulau Majang 11,455 8,704 Sintang FMU Sintang Utara Unit X KPHP Ketungau Tengah Kayu Dujung 9,257 142 Radin Jaya 12,020 160 Senangan Jaya 2,397 41

Senangan Kecil 1,703 373

Tanjung Sari 1,413 39 Grand Total 672,202 23,932 FMU: Forest Management Unit. The unit operated under the Provincial Environmental Forestry Service with the task to strengthen the implementation of sustainable forest management at the field level.

Fig. 1.1. Location of FIP 1-Project in districts of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang, West Kalimantan

h. MHA in the Project Area (i) The History History recorded that before the Dutch came to West Kalimantan there was neither the term of Dayak and Malay. They were identified as names associated with rivers and places where they live nearby or languages they used. To some extent the identification is currently still being used as an identity or signs of the origin person. The During the Dutch era in Indonesia, for the purpose of administrative and politic, they provided those local communities in Kalimantan with two group identity: Malay and Dayak with the main category of religion and traditional belief. Those who practices or converted to Muslim religion were named as Malay while others who observed traditional belief were called Dayak. The later also popular with those who followed Christian religion24.

Malay people consist of two broad categories; Malay migrants from outside Kalimantan and local Malays or native Malay who considered as the MHAs. The later are strongly tied with the Dayak people through intermarriage and reproduction. Malay people are well-known for their strong Muslim identity25. These people somehow are proud being Malay identity as they thought to have higher social status and education.

Most Malay are established in coastal areas and near big rivers or lake used to be inhabited by the Dayak; or as known as the coastal community. They are good traders or middle-men or broker of timber and NTFP businesses. Other community known as inland Malay who closely associated with the Dayak. These people are good in on farm agriculture activities such as planting rubber, cacao, coffee and oil palm and fishers in the rivers and lakes. Some of them, particularly those in inland area, involve in shifting cultivation26. There are also non-native/ MHA who migrated for many reasons to the project site, some of them have assimilated with the MHAs27.

As for the Dayak, they tend to live in the inner area. Like some of the Malay, many Dayak communities are still dependent on forest resources and practicing shifting cultivation. Simultaneously they are collecting non-timber forest products (NTFP) and hunting for subsistence such as deer, wild boar and birds. Some of them, for the reasons of ceremonial purposes, still hunt protected bird species such as Bornean hornbill. Other Dayak communities has moved to semi modern livelihood and planting rubber, cocoa, even oil palm or become traders and government officers at village and sub-district offices or at even higher level 21.

Today these ethic groups are mixed and mingled through a number of systems such as religious, intermarriage and even business and politics. Some of them are also married with other non-MHAs who live in the districts such as Javanese, Chinese, Batak, Balinese and Buginese. The picture of MHAs in the project location also mixed and hence without an intense field interview with them it is a challenge to figure out the origin of MHAs in each village. Some of Dayak ethnic who convert their religious to Muslim identified them

24 Hermansyah 2018. Dayak and Malay Brotherhood in the Malay collective memory of post-independence Indonesia. Al Albab. Vol. 7 (1); pp 55-74. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b- d&q=dayak+and+malay+brotherhood+in+the+malay+collective+memory+of+post-+independence+indonesia+1. Downloaded on 20 January 2021. 25 I. S. Ahyat 2014. The Dynamics of Malay Culture in West Kalimantan in the 20thCentury. Journal of Education and Learning. Vol.8 (3) pp. 273-280. file:///Users/tonnysoehartono/Downloads/268-899-1-PB.pdf. Downloaded on 4 December 2020. 26 M. Marthin, B. Suni, H. Sujaie 2012. Sosial budaya perladangan dayak kerabat di desa tapang perodah kecamatan sekadau hulu kabupaten sekadau the social culture farming dayak kerabat in tapang perodah village Sekadau sub-district Sekadau regency. Jurnal Tesis PMIS-UNTAN-PSS-2012. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/9412-ID-sosial-budaya- perladangan-dayak-kerabat-di-desa-tapang-perodah-kecamatan-sekadau.pdf. Downloaded on 4 December 2020. 27 C. Sada, Y Alas & M. Ashari, L. Geraghty (Reviewing editor) 2019. Indigenous people of Borneo (Dayak): Development, social cultural perspective and its challenges. Cogent Arts & Humanities. Volume 6, 2019 – Issue 1. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2019.1665936. Downloaded on 4 December 2020.

self as a Malay or turun Malayu which make things even more complex to recognize28. But on top of that, relationship between the two in the region is relatively harmonious making the atmosphere in the region is comfortable to live. (ii) Population Today the Dayak is the largest ethnic community group in West Kalimantan (34.93%), followed by the Malay (33.84%). The figure in districts and village varies between the two ethnics. The residents in Leboyan village in Danau Sentarum in district of Kapuas Hulu for example is mostly Malay while those who live in the village of Tanjung Sari and Pading Jaya in the district of Sintang are mostly Dayak community. Compared to the Dayak, the Malay does not have sub-ethnic systems though some time there are people who identify the Malay associated with their place such as Malayu Kapuas29.

Unlike Malay ethnic group, the Dayak community has a number of sub-groups so the term of Dayak appears to be the umbrella of sub-ethnic group, which could be different in language and culture. District wise, a part of Malay, there are numerous of Dayak ethnic or sub-ethnic group who reside in district of Kapuas Hulu such as Taman, Iban, Punan, Bekat, Suhaid, Mmayan, Pengaki, Temambaloh, Suruk, Manday, Aoheng, Semukung, Embaloh, and Seberuang. In 2018, it was estimated that population Dayak Taman about 28.5% followed by Iban (23.3%) and Kantu (11.4%) and the remaining sub-group population was not recorded. As for the district of Sintang, they are also diverse of Dayak ethnic group such as Kantuk, Iban, Taman, Kayan, Suhaid, Punan Bukat, Punan Koreho, Tamambaloh, Suruk Desa, Linoh, Sekujam, Kubid, Ud Danum and Kebahan. Out of this group, population of Dayak Kantuk was estimated as the dominant population in the district30,31. (iii) Traditional Practices This day, there are some of Malay and Dayak communities who are maintaining their traditional live as forest dependent community. They share values and traditional practices in term of managing forest, collecting non-timber forest products including hunting and ladang or shifting cultivation practices. Forest located nearby is commonly owned by the village or group of community. They have traditional wisdom in preserving their forest nearby. In some area, they have and share a tembawang land, an old farm area inherited from their ancestor, planted with various fruits plants22.

In term of ladang practices, recently because of high challenges to open a new cultivation area or ladang they do not clear a new forest area annually. Those lands that is no longer productive or less fertility is converted into rubber plantations or other species such as durian, rambutan and duku. For the purposes of rice cultivation, normally they return to the very old land area or start opening new ladang. This practices lately become a new transition to permanent agriculture. The normal cycle of shifting cultivation in area is approximately 3-4 years22.

The right access to the land or ladang is recognized through a common traditional practice or custom whereby those family who initiated the conversion of forest into ladang and continued manage the land is renowned as those who have legal access to the land. The family normally maintains the access and later can be passed it down to their descendants. Obviously, there is no license for the access to the land as

28 Lathifah. A. Turun Melayu: Konstruksi Identitas Orang Dayak Muslim di Desa Kuala Rosan Kalimantan Barat. Endogami: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Antropologi. Vol 2 (1); December 2018. E-ISSN: 2599-1078. Downloaded on 3 March 2021. 29 Kalimantan Barat Dalam Angka 2021. Biro Pusat Statistik Kalimantan Barat. https://kalbar.bps.go.id/. Downloaded on 30 January 2021. 30 Propinsi Kalimatan Barat dalam Angka tahun 2017. https://kalbar.bps.go.id/publication/2017/08/11/ de84c4884c60a3685dd1772f/ provinsi-kalimantan-barat-dalam-angka-2017.html. Downloaded on 31 January 2021. 31 Prasojo. J.H 2017. Religious and Cultural Existences within the Communities of Upper Kapuas Riverside of West Kalimantan. Al Albab Vol 6 (2); December 2017. Downloaded on 3 March 2021

actually the property belongs to the village or relevant community known as tanah ulayat. By far there was no record of trading in legal right of the ladang area among the ethnic groups32. (iv) Languages In term of daily communication between Malay and Dayak communities, normally they are speaking in Bahasa Indonesia or Indonesian with Malay dialect which almost similar to Bahasa. However, among Dayak communities, some of them quite normal to communicate with their own languages. Though in the younger generation the practices are a bit evaporated. There are a number of Dayak languages in district Sintang which are currently still maintained and commonly use such as Bahasa Iban, Seberuang, Senganan while those in district of Kapuas Hulu many Dayak communities use Iban and Malayic Dayak language33,34. i. Key Program May Affect MHA

The IPPF of the project has identified a number of output and activity which might affect the MHA and its possible triggers8 (Table 1.3). j. Institutional Arrangement

The project has adopted the institutional arrangement which consist of Project Steering Committee (PSC), Implementing Agency (IA), Program Coordinator Unit (PCU) and Project Implementation Support Unit (PISU). Function and roles of the ad-hoc organization is depicted below.

(i) The PSC which comprises of Executing Agency (DG-PSKL) and ADB as well as relevant agencies from the MoEF, Ministry of Finance, and BAPPENAS will supervise and monitor and provide advises to the IA executing the programs in accordance to the agreed project document and the annual work plan (AWP); (ii) The IA consists of six government offices, include: Directorate of BUPSHA, KPHP and PJLHK at the national level and BPHP, BPSKL and TNBKDS at the province and district level. The IAs together supervise and monitor and guide technical implementation and report the project progress to the PSC; (iii) The PCU (PCU) and Project Management Unit (PMU) are the administrative unit which support the PISU to implement the project accordingly (Figure 1.2); (iv) PISU consists of representatives of FMU, Technical Unit Offices of the IA in the province, experts and non-experts of the project and the consultant (PT Hatfield Indonesia). The later coordinates the PISU roles and function of the project, programs and activities in the site level; and (v) In dealing with the technical implementation with the MHAs in the sites PISU divided its role into the following: (a) Key experts which deal with REDD+ issues; (b) Non-Key experts which deal with project monitoring, finance and administration; (c) Key experts in Pontianak with deal with REDD+ MRV and capacity building; (d) Non-key experts in Pontianak which deal with programs of forest fire, FMU business development, project administration and finance; and

32 A. Pahlevi 2019. Bagi masyarakat Dayak, berladang itu sekaligus menjaga keragaman hayati. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2019/10/17/bagi-masyarakat-dayak-berladang-itu-sekaligus-menjaga-keragaman-hayati/. Downloaded on 22 January 2021. 33 Wikiwand. Daftar Bahasa di Kalimantan. Downloaded on 3 March 2021. 34 A, Sujarni, Albertus, B. John (eds), C. P. Istiyani 2008. Keberagaman subsuku dan bahasa Dayak di Kalimantan. Pontianak : Institute Dayakologi. ISBN 978-979-97788-5-7. Downloaded on 3 March 2021.

(e) Non-key experts in districts of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang which deal with community empowerment, safeguard, gender development, procurement, village coordinator and facilitator and financial and administration assistant (Fig. 1.3).

Table 1.3. Program and activities of FIP-I that have possible impact (+/-) toward the MHA35

Program and Output of Activities identified might Trigger/ Not Trigger to the No. FIP-I affected MHA MHA Safeguard 1 Community-focused and (i) Agroforestry (rubber, coffee, Trigger to the MHA Safeguard gender- responsive REDD+ agarwood), ANR and CBFM. pilot project (ii) Community based fire management. (iii) Community livelihood intervention (beekeeping, handicraft, aquaculture). (iv) Community based ecotourism. (v) Small scale infrastructure and road construction. (vi) Micro-hydro development. 2 Provincial REDD+ strategy in (i) REDD+ Workshops and Trigger to the MHA Safeguard West Kalimantan effectively Training at province and implemented exchange visits. (ii) FMU business plan development, Carbon accounting and SFM. (iii) Tenure conflict management, Safeguard and GRM. (iv) Multi-stakeholders consultations and village land use planning. 3 Sub-national fiscal policies (i) Benefit sharing mechanism Trigger to the MHA Safeguard on REDD+ harmonized with and fund flow mechanism for national policies the REDD+ project. (ii) Development of gender responsive proposal for additional fund mobilization.

35 Adopted from the Indigenous People Plan Framework Doc No. 47084 published in June 2016 with some editing.

Fig. 1.2. Structure of Institutional Arrangement of the FIP-I. Community Focused Investment to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project8

Fig. 1.3. Organization structure of PISU -FIP-1 Community -Focused Investment to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project

CHAPTER II: SOCIAL ECONOMY IN THE PROJECT AREA

This section describes the latest figure of social economic including quality life of population reside in the 17 villages located in the two districts where project operates. Data and information in this section were collected from the available statistical agency in district or sub-district or village otherwise gathered from the project field officers. Some data, where available, are presented in time series between 2015 to 2020, otherwise is only provided for the latest year.

1. Population

The population feature of villages in the project area were not completely available as expected. In only adequately presented feature on population and number of households. Other information was limited otherwise not available (Table 2.1).

Table 2.1. Population demography and education according to village in project area in 2020.

Major Ethnic PA Education level (%) District/Village Pop HH D G (%) SR LE Group (%) E J H HE District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk 755 Malay 212 8.9 3.4 95.9 - - 18.6 6.7 0 0 Tanjung Lasa 609 Dayak Bukat & 186 1.0 2.6 93.6 - - 18.4 0 0 0 Dayak Taman Kapuas Batu Lintang 698 Dayak Iban 177 2.0 7.8 60.8 - - 10.3 5.8 0 0 Sungai Uluk 690 Dayak Taman 220 5.3 4.0 103.2 0.4 - 28.0 15.0 12.0 0 Palin Embaloh Apalin Nanga Sangan 1292 Malay 310 0.1 - 153.9 - - 10.2 0 0 0 Tanjung 2355 Dayak Suru’ 245 4.8 - 99.0 0.3 - 9.7 5.1 4.0 0 Selaup 1249 Malay & Dayak 310 10.8 - 108.9 - - 2.3 1.5 1.0 0 Suru’ Nanga Betung 728 Malay 226 17.2 - 115.3 - - 3.4 2.0 2.4 0 Bungan Jaya 757 Dayak Punan 205 0.00 - 108.0 - - 16 0 0 0 Hovongan 3 Tanjung Lokang 584 Dayak Punan 160 0.00 - 115.0 - - 17 0 0 0 Hovongan 5 Vega 621 Malay 207 0.3 - 107 0.7 - 41.2 19.9 19.1 0 Pulau Majang 958 Malay 301 0.2 - 97.0 - - 10.5 5.6 0 0 District of Sintang Kayu Dujung 2,147 Dayak Ketungau 588 32.5 - 113 - - 54.6 28.9 12.6 2.4 Radin Jaya 1,047 Dayak Ketungau 290 12.7 - 105 - - 60 30 10 0 Senangan Jaya 462 Dayak Ketungau 101 28 - 108 - - 26.1 0 0 0 Senangan Kecil 1,254 Dayak Ketungau 447 28 - 110 - - 31.0 0 0 0 Tanjung Sari 990 Dayak Ketungau 212 16 105 - - 54 26 14 4.1 Pop: Population, HH: House Hold, D: Density/ Km2, G: Growth in %, SR: Sex ratio, PA: Productive age, LE: Life expectancy in Year, E: Elementary, J: Junior High School, H: High School, HE: Higher Education. -: Not available. Data are obtained from respected BPS Desa. Source: Baseline survey (2018) and Statistical District (2018)

2. Education and Health Facility

Education Facilities located in the project area appeared to be limited to elementary and junior high school. The later even not exists in every village. None of high school occurs in the project area. Students who wish to continue their education to higher level should go to the districts (Table 2.2). Likewise, health facility was also restricted to Posyandu (integrated health service for children under five years old) and PosKesDes (integrated health service at village level). Nonetheless both health facilities are not existing in every village (Table 2.2).

Table 2.2. Number of education and health facility according to village in project area in 2020.

Education facility Health Facility District/Village E JS HS P P Y P H KD District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Tanjung Lasa 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Batu Lintang 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 Sungai Uluk Palin 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Nanga Sangan 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Tanjung 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Selaup 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Nanga Betung 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Bungan Jaya 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tanjung Lokang 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vega 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 Pulau Majang 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 District of Sintang Kayu Dujung 3 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 Radin Jaya 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 Senangan Jaya 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Senangan Kecil 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Tanjung Sari 3 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 E: Elementary School, JS: Junior High School, HS: High School, P: PAUD/ Children community education, P: PosYandu/Integrated health service for children below 5 year, P: Puskesmas/ Centre for health community at sub-district level, H: Hospital, KD: Village health facility. -: Not available. Data were obtained from respected BPS Desa. Source: Baseline survey (2018) and Statistical District (2018)

3. Certified Teacher and Medical Support

Number of certified teachers and paramedic in the project area appeared to be in line with the respected support facilities. The number of certified teacher and paramedic are very inadequate. None of the doctor available in the project area though some of the village have fortune enough to have mid-wife and paramedics. People in the project area who seriously ill will have to go to the hospital in both districts or even province (Table 2.3).

Table 2.3. Number of certified teacher, doctors and paramedic assigned in villages in the project area in 2020.

Certified Teacher Medic and para -medic District/Village E JS HS Doctor Midwife Paramedic TP District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk 7 7 0 0 0 2 0 Tanjung Lasa 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 Batu Lintang 7 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sungai Uluk Palin 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 Nanga Sangan 2 - - 0 1 1 0 Tanjung 7 - - 0 1 1 - Selaup 9 - - 0 1 1 - Nanga Betung 2 - - 0 - 1 - Bungan Jaya 9 0 0 0 - 1 - Tanjung Lokang 5 0 0 0 - 1 - Vega 8 - - 0 1 1 - Pulau Majang 7 9 - 0 - 1 - District of Sintang Kayu Dujung 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 Radin Jaya 4 0 0 0 - 0 0 Senangan Jaya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senangan Kecil 9 0 2 0 2 0 0 Tanjung Sari 7 4 0 0 1 1 0 E: Elementary School, JS: Junior High School, HS: High School. TP: Traditional Medics. -: data not available. Data were obtained from respected BPS Desa. Source: Baseline survey (2018) and Statistical District (2018)

4. Illiterate People

There was no specific information of number of illiterate people in the villages and sub-district within the project areas. Nonetheless, the District Statistical Agency (Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten) indicated that in 2019 literate population above 15 years in the district was about 93% and 91% for Kapuas Hulu and Sintang respectively.

5. Public Facility

Religious and entertainment or sport facilities occur in most of the villages in the project area. Number of mosques and churches exists in line with the religious population at the respected villages. As for the sport facilities, it appears that most of the villages have volley ball and badminton courts and some even have football field (Table 2.4).

Table 2.4. Number of public facilities according to village in the project area in 2020.

Volley and Football Play Public District/Village Mosque Church Temple badminton Park field ground toilet courts District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk 1 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 Tanjung Lasa 1 4 0 1 3 0 0 0 Batu Lintang 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 Sungai Uluk Palin 1 5 0 2 3 0 2 1 Nanga Sangan 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 Tanjung 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Selaup 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 Nanga Betung 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Bungan Jaya 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tanjung Lokang 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Vega 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Pulau Majang 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 District of Sintang Kayu Dujung 0 7 0 3 6 0 0 0 Radin Jaya 0 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 Senangan Jaya 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Senangan Kecil 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tanjung Sari 1 6 0 1 2 0 0 0 Source: Statistical Districts (2019)

6. Clean water and Sanitation

Most if not all people in the project area highly depends on natural sources for clean water, to be precise river for daily use. Some of them in district of Sintang are using well and springs. Sanitation wise, some community in certain villages still depend on river though there are also records of villages which have private and public toilets (Table 2.5).

Table 2.5. Percentage of Household using various of clean water and sanitation type according to village in project area in 2020.

Clean water and sanitation facility Clean water (%) Sanitation (%) District/Village Rain Home Public Well River S PD River Others water facility Toilet District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk 0 25 40 35 50 25 25 - Tanjung Lasa 0 50 30 20 70 - 30 - Batu Lintang 0 46 40 15 40 10 50 - Sungai Uluk Palin 0 50 30 20 40 10 50 - Nanga Sangan 0 60 30 10 60 - 40 - Tanjung 0 40 40 20 40 10 50 - Selaup 0 40 30 30 35 50 15 - Nanga Betung 0 60 30 10 70 10 20 - Bungan Jaya 0 60 40 - 80 20 - - Tanjung Lokang 0 60 40 - 80 20 - - Vega * 0 70 - 30 - 60 40 - Pulau Majang * 0 70 - 30 - 60 40 - District of Sintang Kayu Dujung 25 20 55 0 0 30 60 10 - Radin Jaya - 50 35 15 0 40 50 10 Senangan Jaya 40 15 - 45 0 50 50 - - Senangan Kecil 15 40 - 30 15 80 10 10 - Tanjung Sari 0 5 10 85 0 90 10 - - S: Spring, PD: District Water Service-: Others; Traditional means. -: data not available. Data were obtained from respected BPS Desa. (*) Vega and Pulau Majang village community use lake water as their settlements are above Sentarum lake. Source: Baseline survey (2018)

7. Electricity

All the villages in the project area were recorded to have electricity either supplied by the State Owned Electric (Perusahaan Listrik Negara) or other means of source such as micro-hydro, diesel or solar cell. The later mostly developed by listrik mandiri desa (self-sustained electricity) through village cooperative or village institutions (Table 2.6). However, there was no information available whether all population of the villages in the project area have enjoyed electricity.

Table 2.6. Number of HH within the village that has electricity in the project area in 2020.

Source of Electricity District/Village Village Self Support Electricity PLN Micro Hydro Diesel Solar cell District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk 0 0 212 0 Tanjung Lasa 186 0 0 0 Batu Lintang 177 0 0 0 Sungai Uluk Palin 0 0 0 220 Nanga Sangan 0 0 0 310 Tanjung 245 0 0 0 Selaup 310 0 0 0 Nanga Betung 226 0 0 0 Bungan Jaya 0 205 0 0 Tanjung Lokang 0 160 0 0 Vega 0 0 207 0 Pulau Majang 301 0 0 0 District of Sintang Kayu Dujung 0 76 0 44 Radin Jaya 0 0 0 250 Senangan Jaya 0 0 0 101 Senangan Kecil 0 0 0 447 Tanjung Sari 0 0 0 210 Source: Baseline survey (2018) and Statistical Districts (2018)

8. Energy for Daily Cooking

Despite limited facilities for supporting educations, health and medical as well as electricity, it was reported that most of the community in the villages within the project area were using portable gas for daily cooking. Some of the villages were using fire wood, in addition to portable gas. None the community in the project area are using kerosene, bio-gas and charcoal (Table 2.7).

9. Livelihood and Income

Statistical documents of both districts published in 2019 reported that the majority of community livelihood in the project area as farmers, fishers, traders and subsistence hunters. Unfortunately, neither information of livelihood nor income available at statistical report at villages level, including those in the project area.

Table 2.7. Number of Household using various energy sources for cooking in the village project area.

Name of Village Fire wood Kerosene Gas Biogas Charcoal District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk 212 0 212 0 0 Tanjung Lasa 0 0 186 0 0 Batu Lintang 0 0 177 0 0 Sungai Uluk Palin 220 0 220 0 0 Nanga Sangan 0 0 310 0 0 Tanjung 0 0 245 0 0 Selaup 0 0 310 0 0 Nanga Betung 0 0 226 0 0 Bungan Jaya 0 0 205 0 0 Tanjung Lokang 0 0 160 0 0 Vega 0 0 207 0 0 Pulau Majang 0 0 301 0 0 District of SIntang Kayu Dujung 529 0 59 0 0 Radin Jaya 150 0 100 0 0 Senangan Jaya 51 0 50 0 0 Senangan Kecil 0 0 447 0 0 Tanjung Sari 64 0 148 0 0 Source: FIP 1-Project baseline survey (2018) and Statistical Districts (2018)

10. Poverty

The latest available information of poor people in the project area was published in district statistical reports 2017. The documents suggested that there were 13 villages; nine in district of Kapuas Hulu and four in district of Sintang, classified under poor status. Awkwardly, for the last of five years, the number of poor people in the respected poor village was constant with the highest number occurred in the village of Kayu Dujung, followed by those in Selaup village. Both villages are under administrative of district of Sintang (Table 2.8).

In addition, both districts reported that there were 25,220 and 40,300 poor people in district of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang respectively. The Gini Ratio of the same year was 0.35 for district of Kapuas Hulu and 0.30 for district of Sintang.

Table 2.8. Number of poor people according to village in the project area 2015-2019 (HH).

Threshold of Poor Name of Village 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 % to HH People in IDR (for 2014) District of Kapuas Hulu 290,026 Nanga Lauk 76 76 76 35 35 16.50 - Tanjung Lasa 16 16 16 16 16 12.70 - Batu Lintang 35 35 35 35 35 18.90 - Sungai Uluk Palin 34 34 34 34 34 16.35 - Nanga Sangan 66 66 92 92 92 29.68 - Tanjung 52 52 52 52 52 15.90 - Selaup 144 144 71 71 71 35.48 - Nanga Betung 32 32 32 32 32 15.09 - Bungan Jaya 91 90 90 90 90 43.9 - Tanjung Lokang 104 104 104 104 104 70.27 - Vega 107 107 107 107 107 51.69 - Pulau Majang 42 42 42 42 42 20.28 - District of Sintang 239,162 Kayu Dujung - - 80 80 80 16.13 - Radin Jaya ------

Senangan Jaya - - 72 72 60.50 - 72 Senangan Kecil - - 118 118 118 38.70 - Tanjung Sari - - 41 41 41 21.24 - Data were obtained from respected village facilitator and Statistical Districts (2018). -: Data not available.

11. Subsistence hunting community

There are considerable number of households, in the project area, who regularly still practicing subsistence hunting. The target of species are not only abundance species i.e., wild boar but also protected species such as rusa deer, mouse deer, porcupine, pangolin and Malayan bear (Table 2.9).

12. Social Capital

The project has identified social and cultural capital belonging to the community in the project area which include intangible and tangible. The first includes (i) traditional rules for practicing sustainable forest management, (ii) traditional medicines, (iii) traditional woven, (iv) storage for rice -paddy and (v) traditional wine and (vi) a number of harvest ceremony while the tangible covers (vii) traditional weapons such as traditional machete and bow-arrows. No artefacts and other heritage materials were located in the project area (Table 2.10).

Table 2.9. Household whose regularly hunting for their subsistence according to village in the project area.

No of HH Target species

Regularly Name of Village Deer Wild bore Other hunting District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk - - - - Tanjung Lasa 74    Batu Lintang 71    Sungai Uluk Palin 220    Nanga Sangan - - - - Tanjung 74    Selaup 31    Nanga Betung - - - - Bungan Jaya 103    Tanjung Lokang 80    Vega - - - - Pulau Majang - - - - District of Sintang Kayu Dujung 6 -  - Radin Jaya - - - - Senangan Jaya - - - - Senangan Kecil 45 - -  Tanjung Sari - - - - Others: Mousedeer, Porcupine, Squirrel, Pangolin, Malayan bear, Birds. Source: Statistical District (2018)

Table 2.10. Social Capital and Cultural Heritage remain in place and well maintained according to village in project area in 2020.

Number of Social Capital and cultural heritage

Intangible Tangible District/ Village R TK CC Other Type of TW Artefact Shrine Other District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk ------Tanjung Lasa    -  - - - Batu Lintang   ------Sungai Uluk Palin - -  -  - - - Nanga Sangan   - -  - - - Tanjung  - - -  - - - Selaup - -  -  - - - Nanga Betung -  - -  - - - Bungan Jaya - -  -  - - - Tanjung Lokang - - - -  - - -

Number of Social Capital and cultural heritage

Intangible Tangible District/ Village R TK CC Other Type of TW Artefact Shrine Other Vega - -  -  - - - Pulau Majang - - - -  - - - District of Sintang Kayu Dujung    -  - - - Radin Jaya    -  - - - Senangan Jaya    -  - - - Senangan Kecil    -  - - - Tanjung Sari    -  - - - R: Local Regulations; TK: Traditional knowledge; CC: Cultural Ceremony; TW: Traditional Weapon (Mandau, Keris, Panah else); Shrine (tempat pemujaan). : exist, -: data not available

13. Summary of Social Economic of Villages in the Project area

The summary of Social economic status of the 17 villages in the project area are depicted in Table 2.11. Despite some in complete data, it suggests that in term of education and health facilities the villages in the project area are classified very poor. On the other hand, public facilities related to sport activities i.e., football and volley ball seem be adequate. Upon the same data, the government looked to adequately support the energy for cooking in the villages. The MHAs also appeared to be adequately maintained diversity of religious, hunting practices for subsistence and social capitals.

Table 2.11. Summary of socio economic status of the 17 in the project area.

Social Economy Status and Supporting Social Economy Data Facility Component Very Poor Poor Adequate Good Incomplete Information on Demography  Education facility  Certified teacher and medical support  Literate people  Public facility  Clean water facility  Electricity  Energy cooking  Poverty level  Population with subsistence hunting  Social capital  Data were obtained from relevant Statistical Village (2019-2020).

CHAPTER III: PROJECT PROGRESS IMPLEMENTATION

This section presents the project program and activity as well as the progress implementation since the kick off in May 2018 up to December 2020. The information related to project activities and achievement in this section were gathered from the project field reports or otherwise collected through interview with the project officers. Furthermore, this report of activities is presented and arrangement in accordance to the output of the project.

1. Project Introduction and Consultation and Participation

The project was officially started on 16 May 2018 and was marked with the kick off meeting in Jakarta and Pontianak. The activity was followed by the first project introduction and public consultation, participated by relevant stakeholders in the province and districts as well as the representatives of MHAs and village officers from the project areas. To ensure there was strong understanding of the project and acceptable to the local stakeholders at field levels, the project has carried out series of introduction and public consultations as well as FPIC (Free Prior Informed Consent) at districts and relevant villages (Table 3.1) (Fig. 3.1).

Table 3.1. Project introduction and consultation with relevant stakeholders in 2018-2020.

Place and number of events Program Note MoEF Province District Village A national kick off meeting was conducted involved all project partners. In the province, a kick off meeting and an introduction meeting to TSC were Project FIP-I 1 2 2 17 conducted, while two introductions were conducted in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu. Introductions were conducted in all 17 villages. Output 1 At the national level, consultation were conducted with Directorate of PKTHA (Handling of Tenurial Conflict and Tenurial Forest). At the province, events were FPIC and GRM 1 2 4 - related to the consultation in preparation Procedure of GRM Guidelines. At the districts, training on GRM and FPIC were conducted by BPHP in both Kapuas Hulu and Sintang. At the province, workshop on agroforestry were conducted with DLHK West Kalimantan. At the district level, events Community based - 1 4 12 were conducted at four FMUs Agroforestry (consultation and coordination). At the village level, events were conducted at 12 targeted villages. A national workshop was held in June 2019. At the province, five workshop on ANR 1 5 3 11 five ANR locations in Kapuas Hulu was conducted by BPHP and BPSKL. At the village level four consultations for ANR

Place and number of events Program Note MoEF Province District Village implementation and 7 consultations during the technical design (FPIC). At the National level, a workshop were conducted in June 2019 (combined with the ANR workshop). At the district, three CBFM 1 - 3 8 events were conducted with FMUs in Kapuas Hulu. AT the village level, 8 targeted villages were consulted. Forest Fire Forest fire prevention programs were Prevention and - - - 10 implemented by TNBKDS at 10 villages Management within the national park. Event at the province was a coordination Livelihood (handicraft, with the TSC related to activities at FMUs. aquaculture, In the district, events were consultation - 1 4 11 beekeeping, and and coordination with four FMUs. At the home gardens) village level, a total 11 events at the targeted villages were conducted. Community based Ecotourism activities are only conducted - - - 4 Ecotourism at the National park in four villages. Event in Jakarta was about legal basis for the road construction within forest area. While in the province were consultation Small scale between BPHP, DLHK and Bappeda West 1 2 3 16 Infrastructure Kalimantan. In the district, consultation with each FMUs and IAs, while at the village level, the FPIC were conducted at 16 villages. Output 2 These events were to support the development of three guidelines, MRV, REDD+ concept 3 3 6 - REDD+ Data Sharing and the SIS- REDD+. At the MOEF, a coaching clinics was conducted in 2019. Socialization and safeguard document dissemination was Safeguard 1 2 4 2 done in the province and district. Event at the village was conducted at the district level. Events at the province and districts consists of need assessment and socialization of the GRM guideline draft. GRM - 2 2 17 At the village level, village facilitators conducted community meeting related to GRM handling procedures. Output 3 Harmonization of These are workshop related to integrating 1 1 0 0 fiscal policy natural capital into national fiscal policy. Benefit sharing & These are series of consultations from the 2 3 2 4 fund flow mechanism village level up to national, presentation of

Place and number of events Program Note MoEF Province District Village draft of the guideline and socialization of the final draft. At the national level, coordination Gender responsive meetings were conducted separately with proposal 3 1 - - potential donors (WB, GIZ, CIFOR). At the development provincial level, consultations were conducted with local NGOs.

2. Estimated Affected Community (AC)

Upon the assessment in the previous section regarding the MHAs in the project sites, it indicates that most of the community who reside in the project area are MHAs. These communities, whose social and economic live may be directly or indirectly affected by the project, as guided by ADB SPS IP 2009, are classified as for affected community (AC) and herein after call as AC (Table 3.2).

Table 3.2. Number of affected and participated MHA -HH in the Project area.

Population Participated Name of Village (HH) MHA♂ MHA♀ Major Ethnic Group MHA (HH) Total MHA District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk 212 212 191 114 343 Malay Dayak Bukat dan Dayak Tanjung Lasa 186 186 149 179 86 Taman Kapuas Batu Lintang 177 177 142 85 176 Dayak Iban Dayak Taman Embaloh Sungai Uluk Palin 220 220 175 106 211 Apalin Nanga Sangan 310 310 248 298 149 Malay Tanjung 245 245 196 235 235 Dayak Suru’ Selaup 310 310 248 446 149 Malay & Dayak Suru’ Nanga Betung 226 225 180 216 108 Malay Bungan Jaya 205 205 123 74 148 Dayak Punan Hovongan Tanjung Lokang 160 160 156 281 94 Dayak Punan Hovongan Vega 207 207 166 298 199 Malay Pulau Majang 301 301 241 433 144 Malay District of Sintang Senangan Kecil 447 447 447 181 96 Dayak Ketungau Senangan Jaya 101 101 101 230 61 Dayak Ketungau Tanjung Sari 212 212 212 227 93 Dayak Ketungau Radin Jaya 290 290 290 337 172 Dayak Ketungau Kayu Dujung 588 588 588 531 191 Dayak Ketungau Total 4,397 4,396 3,853 4,271 2,652 Source: FIP-1 Progress Report and Project at A Glance Data (2020)

3. Progress of activities under Output No. 1: Community-focused and gender responsive REDD+ pilots in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts implemented

Output No. 1 of the project deals with programs and activities which could reverse or at least reduce rate of deforestation and forest degradation in the province of West Kalimantan, to be precise in districts of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang. The programs which focus on empowering of forest dependent community include land-based intervention which include (i) community-based agroforestry, (ii) Assisted Natural Regeneration (ANR), (iii) Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) and the non-land based which cover (iv) livelihood intervention, (v) community-based forest fire prevention and management, (vi) ecotourism, (vii) small-scale infrastructure development and (viii) enhancing capacity related to the community awareness on REDD+ and sustainable management and green school curriculum development.

The project is targeting the MHAs in the project area as the major beneficiaries. The project expects that by the end of its tenure, the involved MHAs will have better capacity to enhance their livelihood quality and well equipped with the knowledge and concept of REDD+. The following are the project activities in accordance with the programs in output No. 1. a. Land-based Program

(i) Program Introduction and Integration As indicated in the previous section, the land-based program has designed to restore about 700,000 ha of degraded forest land which comprises of 670,000 ha of the state forest (Kawasan Hutan) and approximately 30,000 ha of non-forest area (area penggunaan lain). Administratively, the area are located in the 17 villages which all under the jurisdiction of the districts of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang. However, due to the lack of forest management in the province, the selected area has been occupied without the government consent or claimed as customary area, by the community or the MHAs who reside closed by to the area for their ladang or kebun e.g., 163 HH in district of Kapuas Hulu. Some of the occupied area even are located in Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park.

To avoid livelihood displacements, through a number project introduction and FPICs, carried out between October 2018 to April 2019 (Appendix 1, 2), based on recommendation of CBFM workshop took place on 26 June 2019, in Jakarta (Appendix 3) the project has offered the MHA communities in the relevant villages to become project partners or participants for the land-based programs in the occupied area. By being a project partners, the community will neither be displaced from their current land nor have opportunity to join the land-based programs such as agroforestry, ANR and CBFM (Fig. 3.2) (Fig.3.3).

Up to December 2020, the project has been able to integrate a number of MHAs in certain villages into the programs. The integration varies from a program to another; 13 villages (agroforestry), 20 villages (ANR) and 17 villages (CBFM); the later is still being negotiated but informal agreement has been made. As for the ANR, they were MHAs in some villages which located outside the target area (Sekulat, Melembah, Lanjak Deras, Tempurau, Nanga Leboyan, Mensiau and Senunuk) who voluntarily given up their areas and integrated into ANR program (For further information see section of agroforestry, ANR and CBFM in the following part).

The agreement of the MHAs participation into land-based program is reflected in the document of Surat Perjanjian Kerjasama (SPKS) signed by Balai Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan (BPSKL) Wilayah Kalimantan as the representative of MoEF and Head of farmer groups in the relevant villages (Appendix 3).

Fig. 3.2. FIP-1 workshop on agroforestry, ANR and CBFM (top), farmer group discussion on agroforestry (middle) and area of agroforestry (bottom). Facebook of FIP-1.

Fig. 3.3. FPIC and GRM introductions related to Land-based programs in the villages of Tanjung lasa in October 2018 (top), Batu lintang in January 2019 (middle) and Selaup in April 2019 (Bottom). FIP-1 Document.

(ii) Organizing the MHA engagement Following the agreement with the MHAs, the project facilitators, for the purpose of effective and productive works, organized the so-called farmer group (Kelompok Tani Hutan) organization in each relevant village. The group is set up in accordance to the land-based program. For example, those of MHAs who used to work or occupied in the area where allocated for agroforestry will gather under a farmer group of agroforestry while those of them who engaged the land allocated for ANR or CBFM will assemble in the corresponding farmer groups.

The project planned to create 174 farmer groups and with the help of the facilitators, up to December 2020, the project has been able to create 143 groups. Each group which consists of 15-20 MHAs who listed in the agreement had regular meeting to decide the plan for implementing the program, create the working map and boundary the area, schedule the work and regular meeting and select the head of the group. In addition to this, the facilitators also introduced the GRM mechanism to the groups so they understood to deliver their voice, whenever was needed, to the project and head of the relevant villages. (iii) Agroforestry Program The Agroforestry Program was designed to be implemented in degraded forest area of 1,880 ha in 17 villages in the two districts; Kapuas Hulu and Sintang. The purpose of this program is to restore degraded forest cover with high demand agriculture and forest commercial tree species. At the same time, the program will also provide the MHAs with future additional earning value with the non-timber forest products (NTFP) and fruits from the planted species without having to cut the trees. The program eventually will also contribute to the reduction of emission from the project area. (a) Program Implementation Each farmer group of agroforestry in the corresponding village, with the help of the project regularly met to (i) develop the working plan (ii) select the commodities to be planted i.e., rubber, coffee, cacao and agarwood or other species they prefer to (iii) develop a simple working map (iv) create boundary for entire area and for the individual working area and list the supporting needs such as good quality of seeds, fertilizers and common and simple agriculture tools and (v) decide a schedule for periodical group meeting. In addition, the program allows the participants to grow rice-paddy and other crops such as vegetables for daily consumption along with main plantations in the area until such period when the canopy of the trees prevents sunlight penetration to the crops. Regular weeding should be done to avoid competition between the seedling of the trees and the crops. (b) MHAs Participation As mentioned, up to December 2020, there were only 13 villages in the project area which interested and joint the program; eight from district of Kapuas Hulu and five from district of Sintang. The total MHA who participated in the program were 1,721 households or roughly 1.09 ha per household of MHA. The program has also been able to restore degraded area of 1,594 ha out of 1,795 ha target area in 2020 (Table 3). In about a year the program has produced a fruitful yield to the participated farmers making them more convince toward the agroforestry program (Fig. 3.4). (iv) Assisted natural regeneration (ANR) The project has targeted to restore degraded forest of 6,000 ha in the project area through semi succession mechanisms by allowing natural regeneration of native species. To ensure that the area will not be re- invaded or converted for other purposes, the project created the community-based monitoring and patrolling system to protect the area (Fig. 3.5). The restored forest will contribute to the reduction of the current rate of carbon emission from the province of West Kalimantan.

(a) Program Implementation Up to December 2020, the project has been able to ink the agreement with 435 households of MHAs who live in 15 villages in the district of Kapuas Hulu; as mentioned, some of them were originally from other villages beyond those are listed in the project document (villages of Sekulat, Melembah, Lanjak Deras, Tempurau, Nanga Leboyan, Mensiau and Senunuk). The later villages are located in the area of the national park (Table 3.4). Unfortunately, the progress in district of Sintang has been behind schedule due to the delay of budget allocation for district of Sintang by the IA (Balai Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi Kalimantan) in 2020 and hence will be initiated in May 2021. (b) MHAs Participation Until the end of December 2020, the project along with the MHAs who engaged with the ANR program had been able to monitor and patrol the area of 2,001 ha. This was the great achievement as for each MHA was able to manage periodically and patrolling the area of 4.60 ha (Table 3.4).

Fig. 3.4. FIP-1 agroforestry program started in December 2019 has produced fruitful results in the village of Sungai Uluk Palin, district of Kapuas Hulu

Table 3.3. Agroforestry Program according to district and village in the project area in 2018-2020.

Number of Target Pop participants Progress District/ Village of 2020 (HH) Total MHA MHA- (ha) Major ethic group (ha) (HH) -♂ ♀ District of Kapuas Hulu Dayak Bukat dan Tanjung Lasa 186 120.0 31 21 10 55.0 Dayak Taman Kapuas Batu Lintang 177 64.0 38 26 12 64.0 Dayak Iban Dayak Taman Sungai Uluk Palin 220 143.0 160 86 74 143.0 Embaloh Apalin Tanjung 245 213.0 150 100 50 150.0 Dayak Suru’ Selaup 310 295.5 170 92 78 200.1 Malay Nanga Betung 226 39.5 41 35 6 39.5 Malay Dayak Punan Bungan Jaya 205 50.0 46 27 19 0 Hovongan Dayak Punan Tanjung Lokang 160 60.0 35 35 0 0 Hovongan District of Sintang Senangan Kecil 447 150.0 150 92 58 120 Dayak Ketungau Senangan Jaya 101 150.0 139 91 48 140 Dayak Ketungau Tanjung Sari 212 150.0 180 124 56 161 Dayak Ketungau Radin Jaya 250 210.0 210 92 118 210 Dayak Ketungau Kayu Dujung 588 150.0 371 256 115 266 Dayak Ketungau Total 1,795 1,721 1,077 644 1,493 Dayak Ketungau Source: FIP-1 Progress Report (2020). Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program

Table 3.4. ANR Program according to district and village in the project area in 2018-2020.

Number of participants Major ethnic Target Progress District/Village Total group (ha) MHA -♂ MHA-♀ (ha) MHAs FMU areas/Kapuas Hulu Selaup 500 15 11 4 0 Malay Nanga Betung 500 12 8 4 0 Malay Tanjung 500 12 12 0 0 Dayak Suru’ Nanga Lauk 1000 60 43 17 1,000 Malay National Park areas Pulau Majang 200 30 25 5 93.74 Malay Vega 200 30 26 4 226.64 Malay Dayak Punan Tanjung Lokang 200 30 26 4 250 Hovongan Dayak Punan Bungan Jaya 200 30 27 3 200 Hovongan Sekulat* 200 30 27 3 18 Malay Melembah* 200 30 26 4 428.36 Malay Lanjak Deras* 200 30 26 4 34.37 Malay Tempurau* 200 30 27 3 208.49 Malay Nanga Leboyan* 100 30 27 3 95.18 Malay Mensiau* 200 30 26 4 50 Malay Senunuk* 100 30 27 3 238.33 Malay FMU areas/Sintang Senangan Kecil 300 0 0 0 0 Senangan Jaya 300 0 0 0 0 Tanjung Sari 300 0 0 0 0 Radin Jaya 300 0 0 0 0 Kayu Dujung 300 0 0 0 0 Total 6,000 435 363 74 3,000 Source: FIP-1 Project at a Glance (2020). *: Additional villages that are not listed in the project document. Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program

Fig. 3.4 ANR area in the village of Nanga Betung (top), monitoring ANR in the village of Nanga Sangan and Fig.pat r3.5ollin.g ANRCBFM area area thinro uthegh tvillagehe natur aofl b oNangaundary- rBetungiver in th e(top), village monitoringof Nanga Lau ANRk (bott oinm )the. FIP village-1 of NangaDocum Sanganent. and patrolling CBFM area through the natural boundary-river un the village of Nanga Lauk (bottom). FIP-1 Document (2020)

b. Community-based forest management (CBFM)

The project has targeted 10 partnership agreements with MHAs to support the CBFM program, covering an area of 17,000 ha. These partner communities (the MHAs) are expecting to work with the relevant FMUs to manage the agreed forest area sustainably which allow them to commercially harvest non-timber forest products sustainably (NTFP). This area will also be included into carbon market scheme through REDD+. Hence, it limits the harvest of timber for subsistence purposes only. Later, the area will be demarcated through a community participation boundary demarcation processes and closely monitored by the relevant MHAs along with the associated FMUs. (i) Program Implementation The program has substantial challenges as so far only limited MHAs in the project area were interested in joining the program. The issue was mainly related to right access to the forest land after the establishment of CBFM. Some of the community were afraid that once they joint the program the government will restrict their access to other forest land beyond the project area. Therefore, up to December 2020, the program has not been able to ink any agreement with the MHAs in the project area. Nonetheless, as mentioned there are 268 households of MHAs in some villages who informally support and agreed with the program. Despite the issue of formal agreement, the aforementioned MHAs have expressed their commitments to the relevant FMU (Kapuas Hulu) to manage of 22, 866 ha forest area through the scheme of CBFM. The commitment has far surpassed the target CBFM (17,000 ha). In addition, there are five villages in the project area which have already received social forestry licenses which practically are parts of CBFM scheme; Nanga Betung, Tanjung, Selaup, Sungai Uluk Palin, and Batu Lintang (Table 3.5). (ii) MHA Participation There are 268 household of MHAs who informally agreed to support the program which consists of 163 households who live in eight villages in district of Kapuas Hulu and 105 household who live in five villages in district of Sintang (Table 3.5).

Table 3.5. CBFM Program according to district and village in the project area in 2019-2020.

Number of participants Major Target Target Partnership District/Village Total MHA - MHA- Ethnic area in (ha) Agreement (HH) ♂ ♀ group (ha) District of Kapuas Dayak 0 Bukat dan Tanjung Lasa 1,000 42 31 11 Dayak 5,000 Taman Kapuas Nanga Lauk 1,000 30 22 8 Malay 2,000 0 Dayak 0 Tanjung Lokang 1,000 18 12 6 Punan 2,455.5 Hovongan Dayak 0 Bungan Jaya 1,000 15 10 5 Punan 1,825.5 Hovongan Vega 1,000 16 12 4 Malay 2,010.5 0 Pulau Majang 1,000 20 15 5 Malay 1,875.5 0 Nanga Sangan 1,000 22 14 8 Malay 873.64 0 Nanga Betung* 1,000 - - - - 0 Tanjung* 1,000 - - - - 0

Number of participants Major Target Target Partnership District/Village Total MHA - MHA- Ethnic area in (ha) Agreement (HH) ♂ ♀ group (ha) Selaup* 1,000 - - - - 0 Sungai Uluk 0 1,000 - - - - Palin* Batu Lintang* 1,000 - - - - 0 District of Sintang Dayak 0 Senangan Kecil 1,000 16 15 1 720.5 Ketungau Dayak 0 Senangan Jaya 1,000 21 21 0 410 Ketungau Dayak 0 Tanjung Sari 1,000 22 22 0 570 Ketungau Dayak 0 Radin Jaya 1,000 24 20 4 2,710 Ketungau Dayak 0 Kayu Dujung 1,000 22 21 1 2,415 Ketungau Total 17,000 268 215 53 22,866.14 0 0: informal. (*) These villages have obtained the Social Forestry licenses therefor have already under CBFM program. There will be 1-3 adjacent villages clumped into one agreement. Number of agreement: Agreement between MoEF and MHAs related to the area of CBFM. Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program. Source: FIP-1 Project at a Glance (2020) c. Fire Prevention and Management

One of the contributors of emission from forestry sector in the province of West Kalimantan is frequent forest fire. The forest dependent community or MHAs are allegedly causing the fire, for slash and burning purposes and at the same time suffer most from the uncontrol fire. On the other hand, they are the one who for long are the master traditional know-how in dealing with forest fire. Originally and as indicated in the PAM, this program is designed to help Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park in dealing with forest fire in seven villages (Sepadan, Semangit, Lubuk Pengail, Laut Tawang, Sekulat, Datah Dian, and Madang Permai) and three other villages outside the park: Bunut Hulu, Nanga Tuan and Sibau Hilir. However, two of these villages (Bunut Hulu and Nanga Tuan) has also received similar program from GIZ project (FORCLIME), and based on approval from ADB36 on the request from MOEF, these two villages have been replaced. Sibau Hilir was also proposed to be replaced with other villages to make the balance village distribution among FMUs. To make a total of 10 villages as target area, three new villages were added, i.e., Vega, Pulau Majang, and Nanga Leboyan. (i) Program Implementation In the effort to revive the traditional knowledge and strengthen the capacity of MHAs in dealing with forest fire, the project along with the park have introduced the programs and FPIC, took placed in April to June 2020. Following the program introduction, the project has been able to create a number of groups of community-based forest fire prevention and management, Masyarakat Peduli Api- MPA. As indicated in the project Annual Work Plan (AWP) 2020, the groups will be responsible to directly monitor of 26,000 ha of forest area located in the national park and assisted the park’s forest fire division to indirectly monitor the adjacent park’s area of 91,000 ha (Fig. 3.6).

36 Fax Letter No. Ref. Doc Log No.: 47084-002_G501_034, from the ADB Director of Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture Division, Southeast Asia Department, Subject: Grant 0501- INO: Community Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation - Changes in the Project Villages, dated on 9 April 2019.

(ii) MHA Participation Up to December 2020 the project along with the park management have been able to create 11 groups of MPA, consisting 296 households. The project has regularly trained the groups and equipped with simple fire equipment (Table 3.6). The ratio of MPA task to the forest coverage is 1: 87.83 ha for direct forest fire monitoring task and about 1: 307.43 ha for indirect monitoring services. This ratio capacity of MPA is much higher target capacity than those of capacity indicated in the PMA (15; 500 ha).

Fig. 3.6. Photo session of the MPA of Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park, following their training

Table 3.6. Forest Fires Prevention and Management Programs according to village in District of Kapuas Hulu- Fire in 2018-2020.

Number of participants Name of Village or group Total Major ethic group MHA-♂ MHA -♀ MHA Vega 30 30 0 Malay Pulau Majang 55 48 7 Malay Bungan Jaya 10 10 0 Dayak Punan Hovongan Tanjung Lokang 10 10 0 Dayak Punan Hovongan Group Sepadan 32 32 0 Malay Group Semangit 29 29 0 Malay Group Lubuk Pengail 30 30 0 Malay Group Laut Tawang 30 30 0 Malay Group Sekulat 30 30 0 Malay Group Datah Dian 10 10 0 Malay Group Madang Permai 30 30 0 Malay Total 296 289 7 Source: FIP-1 Progress Report (2018-2020). Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program

d. Livelihood Programs

For the purpose of improving MHAs income scale in the project area, the project as mandated by the PMA document to deliver four programs of livelihood intervention; (i) beekeeping, (ii) handicraft, (iii) aquaculture, and (iv) home garden. (i) Program Implementation Upon the series of focus group discussion (FGD) and FPIC with the relevant stakeholders, held in 2018- 2019, (Appendix 1, 2) the project has been able to invite MHAs in several villages to engage with the programs; beekeeping (6 villages), handicraft (5 villages), aqua-culture (6 villages) and home garden (4 villages). Except for the aqua-culture for which the program is dedicated to those of MHAs who live nearby the river or lake, options to join other programs are rested to the preferences and interest of the MHAs in the relevant villages. The project, through its facilitators, lead the process of discussion prior to the implementation and later demonstration of livelihood activities were presented before the MHAs (Fig.3.7). To ensure that the programs were implemented accordingly, the project has provided relevant specialist or extensions to empower practical capacity of MHAs who engaged in respective livelihood program. (ii) MHA Participation (a) Beekeeping The beekeeping program has designed to develop business on stingless and commercial bee species, Trigona spp. The program has been participated by 136 households of MHAs which consists of men and women who reside in 6 villages (Table 3.7).

Table 3.7. Beekeeping Program according to district and village in the project area in 2018 -2020.

Number of participants District/ Village Total individual Major ethic group MHA -♂ MHA-♀ MHA District of Kapuas Hulu Tanjung 30 30 0 Dayak Suru’ Pulau Majang 28 20 8 Malay Nanga Lauk 22 18 4 Malay District of Sintang Senagan Kecil 20 15 5 Dayak Ketungau Radin Jaya 16 11 5 Dayak Ketungau Kayu Dujung 20 13 7 Dayak Ketungau Total 136 97 39 Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program. Source: FIP-1 Progress Report (2018-2020)

Fig. 3.7. Kanvas Model FIP-1 farmer group process discussion related to livelihood (top), creating organic fertilizer for home garden program (middle) and freshwater aquaculture in the village of Nanga Lauk (bottom). ©FIP-1 Facebook

(b) Handicraft There were 85 households of MHAs whose actively participated the handicraft program. The program includes traditional weaving, reviving of traditional dyes, improving quality of traditional handicraft and marketing the products (Table 3.8) (Fig. 3.8 and Fig. 3.9).

Table 3.8. Handicraft Program according to district and village in the project area in 2018-2020.

District/Village Number of participant Major ethnic group Total MHA MHA -♂ MHA-♀ District of Kapuas Hulu Batu Lintang 20 12 8 Dayak Iban Bungan Jaya 15 0 15 Dayak Punan Hovongan District of Sintang Senangan Kecil 20 0 20 Dayak Ketungau Tanjung Sari 15 0 15 Dayak Ketungau Kayu Dujung 15 0 15 Dayak Ketungau Total 85 12 73 Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program. Source: FIP-1 Progress Report (2018-2020)

Fig. 3.8. Woven-training for women engages with the FIP-1 Project in the province of West Kalimantan

Freshwater aquaculture program was participated by 151 households. The program mainly to facilitate technical improvement of the current practice of floating fish enclosure (Keramba) into more effective and efficient (Fig. 3.7). To avoid introduction of alien and expansive species, the fish species for the keramba were selected from local area such as Jelawat and Toman (Table 3.). To help the MHAs in dealing with product diversification and product added value, the project has provided the community in the village of Vega with four units of fish drying processing.

Table 3.9. Aquaculture Program according to district and village in the project area in 2018-2020

Number of participant Major ethnic group District/ Village Total MHA MHA -♂ MHA-♀ District of Kapuas Hulu Nanga Lauk 27 5 22 Malay Vega 30 30 0 Malay Nanga Betung 24 18 6 Malay District of Sintang Senangan Jaya 31 30 1 Dayak Ketungau Tanjung Sari 15 15 0 Dayak Ketungau Kayu Dujung 30 23 7 Dayak Ketungau Total 157 121 36 Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program. Source: FIP-1 Progress Report (2018-2020)

(d) Home Garden Program

As mentioned, home garden program was implemented in four villages, two in the district of Kapuas Hulu and the other two villages located in district of Sintang. The program was participated by 76 households of MHAs in district of Kapuas Hulu and 60 persons of MHAs in district of Sintang, all are women. The program which focused on green based agriculture or organic agriculture cover among others, composing natural fertilizer and pesticide, improving technique of vegetable gardening and creating of simple nursery and planting commercial fruit trees. The commodities selected by the participants include tomatoes, red chili, cabe rawit, long beans, potato, kangkung, cabbage, sawi and tree species in particular durian (Table 3.10) (Fig. 3.9).

Table 3.10. Home Garden Program according to district and village in the project area in 2019-2020

Number of participants District/ Village Total MHA - Major ethnic group MHA-♀ MHAs ♂ District of Kapuas Hulu Dayak Bukat dan Dayak Taman Tanjung Lasa 45 0 45 Kapuas Nanga Sangan 31 0 31 Malay District of Sintang Radin Jaya 30 0 30 Dayak Ketungau Kayu Dujung 30 0 30 Dayak Ketungau Total 136 0 136 Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program. Source: FIP-1 Progress Report (2019-2020)

Fig. 3.9. Making commercial handicraft in the village of Kayu Dujung (top), home garden in the village of Tanjung Lasa (bottom left) and harvesting honeybees from the beekeeping program in the village of Senangan Kecil (bottom right). FPI-1 Document

e. Community based Ecotourism Program

The program is dedicated to help ecotourism program in Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park. Yet, up to the December 2020, the project appeared to have difficulties in finding the qualified ecotourism specialist who are willing to work and stay in the field. Hence the program was temporary implemented by the park. To cope with this issue, with limited capacity the park took over the program providing the concept of ecotourism which include basic concept of ecosystem services and payment for ecosystem services (PES) to the relevant MHAs. The aforementioned capacity building was conducted in a very informal matter so that there was no record on the training events and the associated MHAs participants.

Despite the lack of capacity building, the project upon the request of the national, for the purpose of visitor site seeing and wildlife observation, had been able to support the constructing a 600 meter long and 2 meter width of boardwalk and information center above the lake of Danau Sentarum National Park; the facility is currently still being constructed. This facility is actually one of other ecotourism facilities such as hiking trail, kiosk of information center and toilets. The changes was based on to the park’s ecotourism priority development plan (Fig. 3.10). f. Small-scale Infrastructure Development Program

In order to improve the MHAs productivity and wellbeing, as indicated in the project document, and following series of discussions including FPIC and GRM took place in April 2020 (Fig 3.11), the project and MHAs in the project area agreed to construct a number of small-scale infrastructure facilities. The program comprises of (i) construction of two units of micro-hydro, (ii) installing solar cells for in certain households (iii) constructing clean water facility and (iv) paving a narrow tracks line crossing part of villages and forest area for agroforestry inspection and management, and (v) construction a modest school building. (i) Construction of Micro-hydro Up to December 2020, the project has been able to construct two units of micro-hydro and reconstruction or upscaling a power unit. The later along with a new unit were constructed in the village of Tanjung Lokang in District of Kapuas Hulu and the other unit is located in the village of Kayu Dujung of district of Sintang (Table 3.11) (Fig.3.12).

The construction of facilities was assembled in the forest area (Kawasan Hutan) of the province. Hence, permits for construction the facilities were issued by the Provincial Forest Service. The area required for the constructing turbine and engine house are approximately 0.05 ha and 0.07 ha for Tanjung Lokang and Kayu Dujung micro-hydro respectively.

Table 3.11. Micro-hydro construction according to district and villages in the project area in 2018-2020.

Target Beneficiaries District/ Village Permit (unit) MHA (HH) Major of ethnic group District of Kapuas Hulu Tanjung Lokang 2*  160 Dayak Punan Hovongan District of Sintang Kaju Dujung 1  588 Dayak Ketungau Total 3 748 : completed, *: one of them was upgraded of the existing micro-hydro. : completed. Beneficiaries are all MHAs in the respected village. Source: FIP-1 Progress Report (2018-2020)

(ii) Solar cells Installment The plan for installing solar panel in the village of Radin Jaya is written in the PAM document. In addition, to enhance the electrical capacity in the project area and to accommodate the request of local stakeholders, the project has expanded the plan, through the adopted AWP 2019, to include the villages of Kayu Dujung and Tanjung Sari. Following the FPIC and introduction of GRM, up to December 2020, the project has been able to install of 305 solar cells to the MHAs houses. (Table 3.12) (Fig.3.12).

Fig. 3.10. Toilets for ecotourism program in Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park (top), road for agroforestry access (2nd top), boardwalk crossing P. Majang (3rd top) and ecotourism and information center being constructed in Danau Sentarum (bottom). FIP-1 Document (2020)

Table 3.12. Solar cell installation according to district and villages in the project area in district of Sintang in 2018-2020.

Number of beneficiaries District/ Village Target (unit) Permit Major ethnic group (HH)

Radin Jaya 250  250 Dayak Ketungau Kaju Dujung 42  42 Dayak Ketungau Tanjung Sari 13  13 Dayak Ketungau Total 305 305 : completed. Major ethic community who benefited from the program. Source: FIP-1 Progress Report (2018-2020)

(iii) Clean water Facility The construction of clean water facility is mandated in the PAM document. To follow up the PAM the project in consultation with local stakeholders has been able to construct 13 units of clean water facilities to provide clean water for eight villages in the project area; three units and 10 units for districts of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang respectively. The beneficiaries of this program cover the entire community of the MHAs the respective villages (Table 3.13) (Fig. 3.12). (iv) Constructing or concrete track lines for agroforestry and other community function In following the PAM, the project has planned to construct access road in all 17 villages. Until end of 2020, the project has completed road construction in five villages, two in Kapuas Hulu (Vega and Pulau Majang) and three in Sintang (Kayu Dujung, Senangan Jaya and Senangan Kecil). The constructing of concrete track lines of 1-2 km with the width of 2 meter which crossing the village and forest area was aimed to facility the traffic in the village and support agroforestry activities. Except for the route for agroforestry track line, which decided through village meeting, there were no new lanes created across the village or disturbing MHAs premises, as the construction was only paving the exiting footpath (e.g., 1 m wide and maximum of 2 km long). All access road are constructed at the state-forest area and no private land that will be used for access road construction. Up to December 2020, the project has been able to construct five access road corridors (Table 3.14) and Fig. 3.12). (v) School Building PAM document indicated that FIP-1 provides a green school/community meeting facility in two villages, one in Kapuas Hulu and one in Sintang. Upon the FPIC in Sintang, the head of village of Tanjung Sari has requested a unit of school building with the size of 12m x 6m was constructed in the said village (Fig 3.12). Another green school facility/community meeting building was also constructed in Vega village, Kapuas Hulu. In December 2020, those units have been functioning in the village providing basic education for children and some illiterate elderly people.

Table 3.13. Construction of Clean Water Facility according to district and village in the project area 2018- 2020.

Length of Tower Number pipe based in of Target Per crossing MHAs Progress Major ethnic group District/Village benefici (Unit) mit MHA premises aries premises (m2) (HH) (m) District of Kapuas Hulu Tanjung Lasa 2  - 40 186  Bukat and Taman Kapuas Sungai Uluk Palin 2  2,000 40 220  Taman Embaloh Apalin Pulau Majang 2  3,000 30 301  Malay Bungan Jaya 2 300 - 205  Punan and Hovongan Nanga Sangan 2 1,500 40 310  Malay Nanga Lauk 2 550 40 212  Malay Batu Lintang 2 2,500 40 177  Dayak Iban Tanjung 2 400 40 245  Punan and Hovongan Nanga Betung 2 150 40 225  Malay Tanjung Lokang 2 - - 160 - Punan and Hovongan Vega 2 - - 207 - Malay Selaup 2 - - 310 - Malay and Dayak Suru District of Sintang Senangan Kecil 2  100 40 447 - Dayak Ketungau Senangan Jaya 2  100 40 101 - Dayak Ketungau Tanjung Sari 2  100 40 212 - Dayak Ketungau Radin Jaya 2  - - 250 - Dayak Ketungau Kayu Dujung 2  100 40 588 - Dayak Ketungau Total 2,305 : completed. -: To be constructed. Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who benefited from the program.Source: FIP-1 Progress Report (2018-2020)

Table 3.14. Construction of track lines and boardwalk in the project area in district of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang.

Length and width MHA engagement District/ Village Type of facility of the facility Total Major ethnic MHA -♂ MHA-♀ (km & meter) (HH) group District of Kapuas Hulu Vega Concreted track 2.00 and 2.0 30 18 12 Malay P. Majang Board walk track 0.60 and 2.0 35 22 13 Malay District of Sintang Kayu Dujung Concreted track 1.89 and 2.0 30 25 5 Dayak Ketungau Senangan Kecil Concreted track 1.90 and 2.0 30 24 6 Dayak Ketungau Senangan Jaya Concreted track 2.06 and 2.0 30 25 5 Dayak Ketungau Total Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program. Source: FIP-1 Annual report 2019-2020.

Fig. 3.11. FPIC and GRM consultations for three programs; Clean water facility in the village of Nanga Lauk (top), Micro-hydro in the village of Tanjung Lokang (middle) and Solar panel (bottom). FPI-1 Document (2020)

Fig. 3.12. Construction of pipe for clean water facility in the village of Tanjung Lasa (top), re-construction of Som-micro-hydro at the village of Tanjung Lokang (2nd top), installment of Solar panel in the village of Radin Jaya (3rd top) and construction of School building in the village of Tanjaung Sari (bottom). Facebook of FIP-1 (2020).

g. Capacity building

(i) MHAs level As indicated in the project document capacity building program under this output cover (a) introduction of REDD+ awareness for the MHAs in the project area through a number of workshop and (b) green school curriculum development which may focus on the topic of sustainable forest and natural resources management (c) training to operate small-scale coffee drying machines, latex processing and weaving apparatus. The later will also cover (d) the training on product quality enhancement, value added and product diversification, business plan and marketing.

Up to December 2020, the project has been able to introduce the REDD+ topic and deliver a number of training related to sustainable forest management and green school curriculum to the MHAs in the project area (Table 3.15) (Fig. 3.13). However, the project has not started with training related to business development such as smallscale coffee drying machines and latex processing. BPHP as the implementing unit plans to conduct this task in 2021. BPSKL, in fact has completed the distribution of fish drying machine and training on woven devices in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang (Table 3.16).

Table 3.15. Workshop and training of REDD+ awareness and green school curriculum development addressed to the MHAs in the project area in 2018-2020.

Training on Green School Workshop on REDD+ awareness Development Location of event Major No of No of No of No. of Major ethnic ethnic event Participant event Participant group group District of Kapuas Hulu Vega 2 8 Malay 1 20 Malay Pulau Majang 2 8 Malay 1 20 Malay Batu Lintang 2 8 Dayak Iban - - Taman Sungai Uluk Palin 2 8 Embaloh - - Apalin Nanga Lauk 2 8 Malay - - Tanjung 2 8 Suru’ - - Selaup 2 8 Malay - - Nanga Betung 2 8 Malay - - District of Sintang Dayak Dayak Tanjung Sari 2 8 1 15 Ketungau Ketungau Dayak Dayak Kayu Dujung 2 8 1 5 Ketungau Ketungau Dayak Dayak Senangan Jaya 2 8 1 5 Ketungau Ketungau Dayak Dayak Radin Jaya 2 8 1 5 Ketungau Ketungau Dayak Dayak Senangan Kecil 2 8 1 5 Ketungau Ketungau Grand Total 36 104 5 75 Major ethnic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program. Source: FIP-1 Annual Report 2018-2020

Fig. 3.13. FIP-1 Green School training in the village of P. Majang. FIP-1 Facebook (2020)

Table 3.16. Investment of fish drying and woven device to the MHAs in the project area in 2018 -2020.

Fish Drying Machine and Woven device and Beneficiaries Location of event Beneficiaries No/ Unit Major ethnic group No/Unit Major ethnic group District of Kapuas Hulu Vega 2 Malay 1 Malay Pulau Majang 2 Malay 1 Malay Dayak Punan 2 Dayak Punan Bungan Jaya 1 Hovongan Hovongan District of Sintang Kayu Dujung 2 Dayak Ketungau 2 Dayak Ketungau Tanjung Sari 2 Dayak Ketungau 1 Dayak Ketungau Senangan Jaya 2 Dayak Ketungau 1 Dayak Ketungau Grand Total Major ethic group: Major ethnic community who participated and benefited from the program. Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park has supported aquaculture program in the village of Bungan Jaya and the project supports the fish drying machine for them. Source:FIP-1 Annual Report 2019-2020.

4. Progress of activities under Output No. 2: REDD+ Strategy in West Kalimantan effectively implemented

As suggested in the PAM document, the activities under this output was developed mainly to equip and enhance the provincial officers with the capacity of (i) REDD+ concept, (ii) MRV and REDD+ data sharing, (iii) developing business plan for FMU, (iv) drafting REDD + related provincial regulations and carbon accounting, (v) safeguard information system for REDD+, (vi) GRM related to tenure system, and (vii) REDD+ registration.

In following up the PAM document up to December 2020, the project has been able to the deliver the topics through series of workshop and training held in Pontianak. From the above seven items, the project has conducted six activities. One activity that has not yet conducted is the FMU Business Plan development and will be conducted in 2021. The participants of the events consisted of technical staff from the Provincial Environmental and Forestry Services (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan), Provincial Planning Board (Bappeda Propinsi), Provincial Agricultural Agency (Dinas Pertanian), Bureau of Land Management (Dinas Pertanahan), Bureau of Law Affair (Biro Hukum), Provincial Land Use Agency (Dinas Tata Ruang), and three FMUs (Table 3.17).

Table 3.17. Capacity building, coordination meeting and drafting regulations related to REDD+ for the West Kalimantan provincial officer which took placed in Pontianak in 2018-2020.

Meeting/ Drafting Workshop Training regulations Topic and Event No of Np. No of No. No of No. event Participant event Participant event participant REDD+ concept 1 35 2 30 - - MRV and Data Sharing 2 40 1 25 4 60 REDD+ regulations 2 30 1 20 3 30 Carbon accounting 1 30 2 30 - Safeguard information system 1 35 2 30 - on REDD+ GRM for tenurial 2 35 2 30 - REDD+ registration 1 34 2 34 - Grand Total 10 239 12 199 7 90

5. Progress of activities under Output No. 3: Sub-national Fiscal Policies on REDD+ Harmonized with National Policy

As outlined in the PAM document, the activities under this output will emphasize on (i) assessment of fiscal policies and possible incentive related to reduction of carbon emission from the forest sector, (ii) enhancement of coordination and information dissemination related to REDD+ planning, (iii) conduct policy dialogue on fiscal and benefit sharing related to carbon emission and (iv) gender responsive proposal development to identify relevant funding source for REDD+ implementation.

In the attempt to materialize the activities under this output, the project has facilitated workshops and coordination meeting related to fiscal policies and coordination and incentives associated with carbon emission from forestry sector. Up to December 2020, the project has been able to conduct series of activities which related to fiscal policy and REDD+ planning coordination. The events were held in Pontianak and participated by 304 people (Table 3.18). Fiscal workshop related to REDD+ was initiated in Jakarta on 12-13 August 2019 (Fig. 3.14).

Table 3.18. Workshop and coordination meeting related to fiscal harmonization associated with REDD+ in Pontianak took placed in 2018 -2020.

Workshop Meeting Coordination Topic and event No of event No. Participant No of event No. Participant Assessment of possible fiscal policy 2 50 4 18 related to REDD+ Coordination Meeting on REDD+ 3 45 8 26 Planning Policy dialogue on Fiscal and Benefit 4 60 6 35 sharing related REDD+ Gender responsive proposal development to Identification possible 1 32 4 38 funding sources for REDD+ Grand Total 10 187 22 117

6. Information dissemination

In order to promote the programs and activities of the project, a number of information related to project; plans, agendas, progress and results were produced and distributed in the province and the districts. The information was disseminated through various means such as website, posters, journal and flyers. As for the web, the official information can be assessed in the portals of MoEF, ADB, Directorate General PSKL and PTHI. This information is updated regularly as necessarily. An example of these information materials are presented in Appendix 5.

Other printed information was regularly distributed to the relevant offices both at ministerial and province/district levels, and more importantly to the appropriate stakeholders at the village level. Posters also provided in Forestry Services in the province and in FMU offices as well as in the project offices at districts. In addition, the project regularly exposes its program and activity at the local radio in the districts (Table 3.19).

Table 3.19. Model of information dissemination of the project.

Media for Project Publication Relevant Social Local Policy institution Web Journal Poster Flyer Others Media Radio brief MoEF    -    Exhibition ADB    -    - DG-SFEP    -    Exhibition Province    -    - District        - BKDS National Park    -    Exhibition : Available and continue being posted and disseminated, -: no information

Fig. 3.14. Workshop on Fiscal related to REDD+ was held in Jakarta on 12-13 August 2019.

7. Grievance and Redress (GRM) a. Organization and Mechanisms

To ensure that the project is not going to have adverse effects or to the most extend avoid negative impact toward local stakeholders in particular the MHAs in the project area, the project has adopted its own GRM system. The system provides a simple and practical channel to receive voices from stakeholders as well as to address them in meaningful responds (Fig. 3.15). For this purpose, the project has produced and distributed GRM procedure in Bahasa Indonesia Mekanisme/ Prosedur Penyelesaiain Pengaduan FIP (Appendix 6). Nonetheless for practical reasons complaints and objection related to the project activities were delivered in a hand written on blank paper to the head of adat for verification and further process in PISU. b. Voices and Respond

Up to the end of December 2020, the project in district of Kapuas Hulu has received two complaints related to issue of transparency on funding for agroforestry. The issues were raised by MHAs who live and joint the project in the village of Sungai Uluk Palin.

82. At the village level, APs through their facilitator or representative may bring the complaints to the village leaders and/or customary leaders, then they may bring it to the officers in project’s field office or sub-project site office. Specifically,

(i) The AP narrates discontent to the community leader (Tumenggung for MHAs of the Dayak and Penghulu for the MHAs of Melayu). Conveying the grievance to Tumenggung or Penghulu is commonly done when the case could not be settled by lower adat authority (kepala adat dusun) at hamlet (dusun) level within 3 days. (ii) The community leader – Tumenggung or Penghulu – prepares an official report for documentation purposes and attempts to address and resolve the grievance at the community level. Cases have to be acted upon/resolved at the community level within one (1) week. (iii) If the AP is satisfied, there is no need to elevate the issue. If the grievance cannot be addressed at the village level, the Tumenggung or Penghulu submits the complaint to PISU.

83. Flow chart of GRM applicable to IP greivances is provided below:

FMU (c/o PISU)

Tumenggung (Dayak) or

Penghulu (Melayu) (Resolution within one week)

Adat authority at hamlet/dusun level (Punan) or pateh (Iban)

(Resolution within one week)

Affected person (s)

Fig. 3.1 5. Organization structure and mechanism of GRM of the FIP I- Project 84. The community development specialists, and/or safeguards specialists will assist APs in registering their complaints with PISU, field office or sub-project site office, and preparing their specific grievance. The PISU will consider the complaint and within 15 working days will convey As for thea d edistrictcision tofo tSintang,he APs. Stheoci aprojectl safeg ureceivedards speci considerablealists, along w highith lo canumberl gover nofm equestionsnt district and complaints from theof fMHAs.icials, w iTherell facilit awerete co m49m issuesunicatio nwere betw eraiseden the relatedAPs an dto t hthee P lateISU andof payment assist th efor p rconstructionoject of clean water and malfunction of construction of reservoir, 99 issues related to broken and malfunction of solar cell and one connected to the broken of micro-hydro. All the issues and complaints have been addressed with satisfactory respond (Table 3.20).

Table 3.20. Grievance and Redress Mechanism (GRM) under output 1 of the project.

Grievance and Redress Mechanism (GRM) Program Issue of complaint No of No of Satisfactory complaint respond Community based Transparency of funding program and 2 2  Agroforestry seedling quality Forest Fire Prevention 0 0 0 and Mgt Clarity on land/forest access, conflict among community activity area Livelihood 5 5  boundary, lost of equipment, less success on the aquaculture program. Community based 0 0 0 Ecotourism Design of clean water, labor payment, and malfunction of water pipe line and solar cell. Three unresolved complaints were to Small scale Infrastructure 148 145  be addressed by BPSKL and require additional budget to fix three clean water facilities that have not functioned well in Sintang. : Responded and no further complaint

CHAPTER IV. GAP ANALYSIS

This chapter illustrates the gap analysis of the FIP-1 project implementation. The gaps were assessed mainly through desk study analysis. To ensure the assessment was accurate discussion was done with the project leader. In normal condition, the gap analysis should be done through a rigorous field observation and desk study. However, due to the pandemic of Covid-19, this study was relied on the secondary data provided by the project.

The Project Administration Manual (PAM) and Project’s Annual Work Plan (AWP) were used as the reference of planning document while the annual reports and additional information from the project leader are used as the against evidence and the latest status of the program implementations. As this is the first analysis during the project tenure, the period of study is constructed for two years, from the beginning of the project activities to December 2020. The analysis is summarized in the table which depicts the plan in accordance to the project document, the AWP and followed by implementation and the corresponding gap, if occurs, as well as the possible causes (Table 4.1). The proposed action to close the gap is deliberated in the following chapter (Chapter V).

Table 4.1. Gap analysis of the project; Community-Focused Investment to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation in the province of West Kalimantan.

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) Generic or crosscutting issues Information disclosure, Strongly required As indicated in Continued to Implemented in None consultation and the PMA be Jakarta, participation implemented Pontianak, as required by Sintang, Kapuas the PAM Hulu and all relevant villages Location of the project 17 villages in two districts 17 Villages 17 villages 17 villages in two None districts with slightly change in locations Introduction of FPIC Strongly required Be conducted Be conducted Implemented Required Improvement of Inadequate in all relevant in all relevant documentation resources villages village Introduction of GRM Strongly required GRM All complaints Implemented Improvement of Low level of procedures were recorded, documentation involvement from introduced in followed up Implementing all relevant and monitored. Agencies/Units and villages FMUs GRM Procedure Not specified but indicated in IAs indicated in As indicated in Operational but Required further Low level of the PAM the PAM the PAM need more clarity improvement involvement from Implementing Agencies/Units and FMUs Number of beneficiaries 10,000 villagers 9,390 11,628 Achieved None Number of affected IP Not specified 2,704 4,396 4,396 Households None Scheduling 2018-2022 Implemented Implemented On track None Project monitoring Not specified but required No information No information Partially Need more action Inadequate implemented and resources and late

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) limited to in recruitment of environmental external monitoring issues expert Program/ activity under Output No. 1 Agroforestry Target area 1,880 473.5 544.5 Partially Achieved On track but need more Challenge in area (all remaining effort selection, 860.5 hectares synchronization will be completed with the FMU’s in 2021) long term development plan and ensuring the overlap with REDD+ Accounting Areas Integration of Not specified All agroforestry 5 villages in Partially None agroforestry into SF area in Kapuas district of Implemented programs Hulu within the Sintang to have SF license SF licenses Partnership agreement Not specified 20 agreement 32 agreement Implemented and None on Agroforestry agreement completed Number of engaged Not specified 370 1,020 1,390 Household- None MHA achieved as planned Gender inclusion Strongly required 3:1 3:1 3:1 None Commodities Rubber, Coffee, Cacao, Jengkol, Petai, Jengkol, Petai, Implemented with None Agarwood Coffee, Coffee, closed Agarwood Agarwood consultation with MHAs

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) Capacity building Farming techniques Implemented Implemented Implemented None by FMU by FMU Farming organization Implemented Implemented Implemented None by FMU by FMU Coffee drying - - To be done in On track 2021 Latex processing - - To be done in On track 2021 Evaluation of capacity Required - - Not implemented Need further action Not specified in the building AWP Procurement Coffee machine - - To be done in On track 2021 Latex processing machines - - To be done in On track 2021 Support facility Development of three units of Not included Technical To be done in Behind schedule The budget was nursery Design for 2021 only allocated for three nurseries 2021 Construction of concrete track to Not included Constructed in Partly On track agroforestry area (at 17 villages) 5 villages implemented. The remaining will be done in 2021 and 2022. ANR Target area 6,000 ha Not included 3,000 ha Partially Required more effort Limited capacity of properly achieved. The Implementing managed and remaining will be Agency technical completed in design for 2021. 1,500 ha is prepared

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) Integration of ANR into Not specified Not included 3,000 ha ready Partially achieved None SF Programs to be integrated and implemented into SF license. Partnership agreement Not specified Not included 16 partnership Implemented None on ANR agreement completed Number of engaged Not specified Not included 435 435 households Required more Understanding the MHA participants ANR concept Gender inclusion Strongly required - 5:1 5:1 None Capacity building Strongly required but not Not included Technical Implemented; None specified Assistant farming training on organization, ANR, monitoring patrolling, system and forest fire Patrolling system management Evaluation of capacity Required but not specified - - No information Need further action Not specified in the building AWP CBFM Target area 17,000 ha Not included A total of 22,866 ha Exceeded the target area High interest from 22,886 ha in 7 MHAs and FMU. villages Project need to included ensure MHAs involvement in all activities Integration of CBFM Not specified A workshop on Budget for Partially Required more effort MHA into SF Programs integration of CBFM Implemented understanding of CBFM into SF integration into the SF Program scheme SF is allocated by BPSKL

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) Partnership agreement Partnership Agreement between Not included Draft of Under negotiation Required more effort Bureaucracy of on CBFM MHAs and FMUs agreement with MHA groups approval form the completed and in 7 villages Provincial Forest negotiated Service in Pontianak Participated Mapping Strongly required but not Not included Implemented Implemented Required information Mapping results specified through required approval participatory from Provincial mapping Forest Service Number of engaged Not specified - 268 268 households Required more participant More participants MHA were engaged during preparation of proposal and technical verification Gender inclusion Strongly required - 4:1 4:1 None Capacity building Ecosystem services Implemented Implemented Implemented; None by BPHP by BPHP ecosystem services, patrolling and monitoring, sustainable harvest of NTFP Evaluation of capacity Required but not specified - - No information Need further effort Not specified in the building AWP Forest Fire Program Coverage forest area to 5,000 ha (directly) and 91,000 As indicated in Direct and Implemented: Exceeded the target Required more be monitored ha (indirectly the PAM indirect 26,880 Ha budget allocation monitoring area (directly) and for monitoring the increased 79,693 Ha area (indirectly)

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) Creation of community Strong required but not clearly 10 MPA groups 11 MPA groups Implemented; 11 None fire ranger group specified were were groups of MPA established established (community forest ranger group) has been established Capacity of direct forest 1: 30 ha 1:89.6 ha 1:87 ha Implemented with Need more information on MHAs should be monitoring higher target drone monitoring system regularly trained capacity (1: 87ha and remote sensing which and practiced for direct could increase the monitoring and 1: monitoring capacity 307 ha for indirect monitoring) Location Betung Kerihun and Danau As indicated in As indicated in Implemented; None Sentarum National Park and the the PAM the PAM Betung Kerihun surrounding areas and Danau Sentarum National Park and the surrounding areas Equipment of fires Strongly specified but not clearly All related All equipment Implemented; None suppression specified equipment is is handed over equipment procured to the MPA includes forest fire suppression devices and machinery (Toolkits, Machinery (Pump and others), and Personnel Use) Number of engaged Not Specified 266 296 296 households None MHA

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) Gender inclusion Strongly required 42.1 42:1 42:1 Capacity building Not specified but strongly Training for Training for Implemented; None required MPA MPA Trainings were conducted by Manggala Agni (MoEF) and TN BKDS Evaluation of capacity Required but specified - - No information Need further effort Not specified in the building AWP Community based Ecotourism Location Villages located in Betung Designed in Designed in Partially None Kerihun and Danau Sentarum villages of villages of Implemented; in National Park Vega, P. Vega, P. the villages of Majang, Majang, Vega, P. Majang, Tanjung Tanjung Tanjung Lokang Lokang and Lokang and and Bungan Jaya Bungan Jaya Bungan Jaya Number of engaged Not specified - - No information on Required more MHA number of MHAs information participated in the program Gender inclusion At least 30% women and youth Not specified in Not specified in No information on Required more Inadequate are engaged in the development the AWP but the AWP but number of MHAs information documentation for processes. Gender-equitable, already already participated in the gender inclusion by benefit sharing mechanisms will included into included into program field project officers be promoted. the Gender the Gender Action Plan Action Plan 2019 2019 Capacity building Not specified Training for Promoting No information on Required more Funding and guide, partnership number of MHAs information program have not interpreter, properly allocated

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) ecotourism agreement participated in the management through CBFM program (homestay, sanitary, culinary, transports, etc.) Evaluation of capacity Required but not specified - - No information Need further effort Not specified in the building AWP Support facility Development of tracking/ hiking Construction of Construction of Partially Required more Substantial line, Kiosk of information center ecotourism guest house, implemented; information challenges for and toilets facilities: toilets, guard Boardwalk for mobilization and entrance gate, rail, and ecotourism in construction in mosques, ecotourism Danau Sentarum remote and lake hiking track, roads. is being area. guest house, constructed jetty docking, shelter, camping ground Livelihood Program Location All 17 villages To be done in Continued in all Implemented in None all villages in villages in the the village of the project area project area Tanjung Lasa, Batu Lintang, Tanjung, Nanga Betung, Nanga Lauk, Tanjung Lokang, Nanga Sangan, S Uluk Palin.

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) Sintang: Radin Jaya, Senangan Kecil, Senangan Jaya, Kayu Dujung. Type of program Beekeeping, fish drying, fish Handicraft, Bee Handicraft, Bee Implemented with No information on NTFP Business production, handicraft and Keeping, Keeping, certain production and development and NTFP production, home garden Catfish, NTFP Catfish, NTFP, adjustment; commercialization product and commercialization home gardens Beekeeping, commercialization home garden, to be implemented freshwater in 2021, in parallel aquaculture, and with the handicraft development of FMU Business Plan and Gallery development Number of 500 community members (150 1,388 1,756 Implemented and None engaged/beneficiaries women) community community varies according MHA members (479 members (544 to program women) were women) were engaged engaged Gender inclusion Strongly required 2:1 2: 1 Varies to the None program but in general 2: 1 except for home garden 0: 136. Evaluation of capacity Required but not specified - - No information Need further effort Not specified in the building AWP Support facility Handicraft tools (e.g., weaving Handicrafts tool Handicrafts tool Implemented; None tools, bee keeping, fish drying and equipment and equipment farming tools, for agroforestry for handicraft kits

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) tools), equipment for agroforestry, and beehive agroforestry, processing house fish drying and boxes were processing provided by house BPSKL and TNBKDS Small-scale infrastructure Micro-hydro (2 units) 2 units 1 unit in the 1 unit Implemented; 1 None village of Kayu reconstruction unit of was Dujung and 1 new unit constructed in will be installed Kayu Dujung in the village of village, Sintang Tanjung and 1 unit and 1 Lokang unit reconstruction were constructed in Tanjung Lokang village, Kapuas Hulu Location Not specified Kayu Dujung National Park Implemented in None was selected has requested the villages of based on for one unit of Tanjung Lokang consultation micro-hydro and Kayu Dujung with community facility in and FMU of Tanjung North Sintang Lokang. Electric power capacity 40 Kva 20 kVA 20kVA 40 Kva None Target of beneficiaries 200 Households Not specified Not specified 748 Households Exceeded the target Solar panel Location Village of Radin Jaya Solar panel will The program is Implemented in Exceeded the target be provided by completed the three villages; BPSKL for the Radin Jaya, Kayu

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) (remaining 4 units will be constructed in 2021) Target of beneficiaries Not specified 768 HH 1,537 HH 2,305 None Households; exceeded the target Concrete track line 2km per relevant village Not included 5 constructions Partially Required more effort. Clarity on land implemented; Three roads construction status, ownership constructed in 5 will be conducted in 2021 of constructed road out of 17 villages and another 7 packages and remoteness of will be conducted in 2022 several villages Location Not specified Not included Will be Implemented in None constructed by the villages of BPSKL in the Mega, P. Majang villages of (in Kapuas Hulu) Kayu Dujung, and Kayu Dujung, Sanangan Senangan Jaya Kecil, and and Senangan Senangan Kecil (Sintang) Jaya, Sintang. TNBKDS will be construct in the villages of Vega and Pulau Majang Target of beneficiaries Not specified - 720 HHs 720 Households None School building Two units of green school BPSKL will - Implemented as None building/ community meeting construct one planned facilities building in

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) Tanjung Sari, and TNBKDS constructs one in Vega Capacity building SFM and Ecosystem services Trainings for No training Implemented None Program school program following the teachers, related to project document MHAs and green school in FMUs of North 2020 Sintang and TNBKDS staff Evaluation of capacity Required but not specified - - No information Need further effort Not specified in the building AWP Developing green Green school curriculum Green school No program Implemented None school curriculum development curriculums included developed for the villages of Tanjung Sari and Vega REDD+ awareness Not specified but strongly Training on Training for Implemented and None required REDD+ MHAs varies according Awareness, continued to topics (1,388 SFM, community Ecosystem members ; 479 services, women) in 2019 community and 1,756 organization members (544 development women) were engaged Safeguard and GRM Not specified SIS-REDD+ SIS-REDD+ SIS-REDD+ and None and GRM and GRM GRM are targeted

Program/Activity Specific requirement and/or Implementation Gap between the agreed indicated in the Target or Plan in the project’s Target in AWP Target in AWP up to December plan and the Possible cause Project’s document document (Ha/Unit/ 2019 2020 2020 implementation (PAM and IPPF) Households) Output No. 2 and Capacity development for Not related to output No. 3 government staff in the province the MHAs and district Budget (by output and No Information on budget for IP Not included in Not included in Notes: Budget None GoI co-finance) Program the MHA the MHA provided in this Program Program table is for the whole program. No separation for a specific MHA program. Output No. 1 USD 15.61 M $2,552,141.65 $1,672,670.50 Only 28% of the Need more effort to The lateness of total budget has disburse the fund. project been spent for commencement Output 1 until and low level of 2020 disbursement in each IA Output No. 2 USD 1.40 M $62,668.58 $26,197.51 Only 7% of the Need more effort to The lateness of total budget has disburse the fund. project been spent for commencement Output 2 until and low level of 2020 disbursement in each IA Output No. 3 USD 1.68 M $84,796.24 $44,315.24 Only 12% of the Need more effort to The lateness of total budget has disburse the fund. project been spent for commencement Output 3 until and low level of 2020 disbursement in each IA

CHAPTER V. THE ACHIEVEMENT AND PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION

This chapter describes the achievement of the project implementation related to MHAs since the beginning of activities until December 2020 and the gap or discrepancy between the planning of program/activity and the results of the implementation of the corresponding program/activity. The two features are solely taken from the gap analysis presented in the previous chapter (Table 4.1). The following are the achievement presented in accordance to programs/ activities under output No. 1. The achievement of other outputs will not be presented in this report as there are not dealing with the MHAs

1. Project Achievement

Consistent with the Table 4.2 where the analysis was presented, this section is divided into two section sections; (i) generic or crosscutting issues which comprises of nine elements and (ii) program/activity which consists of eight activities. a. Generic issues

Upon the previous assessment this section has indicated that five out of the nine elements have completely implemented in accordance to the plan while four elements required more effort. The later includes FPIC and GRM documentations, GRM procedure and project periodical monitoring. The possible causes for the first three appear to be the lack competency of the support staff while the last one is due to the absence monitoring plan in the planning document. b. Program/ activity

This section includes (i) agroforestry, (ii) ANR and (iii) CBFM), (iv) Forest Fire Program, (v) Community- based Ecotourism, (vi) Livelihood, (vii) Small-scale infrastructure and (viii) Capacity building. (i) Agroforestry At the moment the program has been able to integrate 1,019.5 ha out of the 1,880 ha target area. Two activities under this program which required more efforts; expediting the process of negotiation with relevant MHAs to integrate the remaining target area into the agroforestry programs and development of two nurseries to support the programs. There is also no information related to the plan and progress of the inclusion of the current agroforestry area into Social Forestry Program. (ii) ANR The project has consistently invited MHAs to integrate their forest land into the ANR program. Up to December 2020, there are 3,000 ha out of 6,000 ha target area already implemented on the community based ANR. Considering there is another two year to the end of the project period, the program seems to be on course though further effort is required. The program has also prepared to facilitate the inclusion of the current ANR area into Social Forestry scheme. (iii) CBFM The project has received informal committed from seven MHA farmer groups to integrate 28,925 ha of forest land into CBFM program, this area is exceeding the target of 17,000 ha of CBFM. Partnership agreements with them have been drafted and being negotiated. Boundary of the area has been identified and demarcated through participatory mapping while capacity empowerment to manage the area as CBFM have been done. The area will also be proposed into Social Forestry Program.

(iv) Forest Fire Program The program has been able to set up 11 groups of Masyarakat Peduli Api (MPA) which will be partner Forest Fire Division of Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park (TN BKDS) in dealing with forest fire management in the park area and its surrounding. The project has granted the groups with forest fire equipment and provided regular training programs. However, there are two issues that still required attentions and followed up; procurement of drones and remote sensing facility to the national parks and training for operating and maintaining the facilities. The two facilities are designed to assist the park in dealing with park monitoring system in particular related to fire hot spots. (v) Community-based Ecotourism Up to December 2020, the program looks to be behind schedule or will be accelerated in later period. Except for constructing support facilities such as boardwalk, toilets and information center in Danau Sentarum National Park, training on soft and hard skill related to ecotourism are lacking. There other facilities indicated in the project document which should be constructed; hiking track, guest house, entrance gate, jetty for boats and mosque. One of the possible causes of the delay was the relevant Implementing Agency (IA)- TNBKDS has not properly allocated funding to support the training for the ecotourism program. (vi) Livelihood Program Most if not all livelihood programs have been implemented in accordance with the plan. Number of beneficiaries who engaged with the program (1,756 households) are exceeding target (500 households). Capacity building for each program has been carried out accordingly. Support equipment for handicraft and fresh water aquaculture such as fish drying machine have been procured and granted to the MHAs. Some of the programs such as beekeeping, aquaculture, home garden has produced fruitful yields. The only plan that seems left out in the implementation is NTFP harvest program. (vii) Small-scale infrastructure Except for the constructions of clean water facility and concrete track line for agroforestry support, all other facility such as micro-hydro, solar panels and green school building have been completely constructed as planned. The beneficiaries of micro-hydro installment are 748 households while the beneficiaries of solar panels and clean water are 247 households and 2,305 households respectively. These number of beneficiaries are way above the target set up at 200 households for each facility. The remaining facilities (clean water facility) will be constructed in 2021. (viii) Capacity building Capacity building which include sustainable forest management, REDD+ awareness, ecosystem services, green school curriculum development, coffee drying and latex and fish product processing have been implemented accordingly, except for coffee and latex processing. The program in 2019 has been participated by 1,388 MHAs of which 479 are women and in 2020 was participated by 1,756 MHAs of which 544 of them are women.

2. Proposed Corrective Action

Despite all the seemingly success of the project in achieving the outputs as listed in the project document; the PMA and AWP of 2019-2020, there are a number of matters identified and required special attentions. Without proper correction the current issues might lead to the bigger challenges. The following are programs/ activities that required corrective actions which presented in accordance to the generic issues and programs/activities.

a. Generic issues

(i) Documentation The fact that during the writing of this report there was substantial challenges in collecting and discovering the project documents in particular reports of FPIC and GRM, it suggests that the project requires competent administrative staff who able to neatly document the important files or reports throughout the project cycle or even until sometime when the document is expired. To ensure that such problems will no longer happening in the future the project could provide special training on the matters to the relevant admin staff. (ii) GRM Procedure The project actually has adopted GRM procedure which presented in the PAM document. Though the procedure seems to be straight forward, it has not accompanied with formal form which perhaps made difficult for the project to record the GRMs. For the purpose of better documentations, formal procedure of GRM is proposed as attached in Appendix 5. (iii) Project Monitoring The project has endured approximately two years. Many activities have been achieved and so to with the challenges and experiences both technical and non-specific. It seems unfortune that up December 2020, the project has not implemented periodical monitoring which could provide overall pictures of the achievement, challenges, lesson learned and feedback from the relevant stakeholders at the given period. The latter is pivotal for the project to accommodate, where possible, stakeholder views and avoid as much as possible the potential negative impacts. For that purposes, it is recommended that the project organizes a periodical monitoring program. b. Programs/ activities

(i) Land-based Program The land-based program (Agroforestry, ANR and CBFM) is a land mark of the project as the program has a back bone and core activities in dealing climate change issues through activities related to reducing deforestation and forest degradation through sustainable forest management and creating an optimal economic benefit derived from forest land in the project sites. The project appears to be on track in inviting the MHAs to participate into the program. Up to December 2020, the program has been participated by 2,093 MHAs and able to integrate of 26,885.5 ha of forest lands in districts of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang.

To ensure that the MHAs participated in the program will have legal tenure right with the land, the project, following recommendation of the Social Forestry-CBFM Workshop held in August 2019, has facilitated the integration of the program into the current national Social Forestry (SF) Program. Yet to assure that the license of SF will be issued and received by the relevant MHAs before the end of the project period, the program should expedite the process of land-based integration into SF.

The program could also start assessing whether at this point there has been positive effect of the program on deforestation rate in the project sites by comparing the degree of deforestation prior to the project establishment and after two-year project implementation. (ii) Forest Fire Program Up to December 2020, the program has achieved substantial progress in dealing with forest fire prevention and management. The program has successfully created 11 groups of fire rangers (Masyarakat Peduli Api) which can help Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park in coping with potential forest fire in its area and the surroundings. To assure the groups will be skillful regular training has been scheduled by the program. In addition, the groups have been equipped with mobile fire extinguishers. The park has also been granted with fire monitoring advance technology such as drone and remote sensing. Yet training and

practices for the application the technology appear to be lacking. To assure that the equipment will be functioning optimally, the project should provide intensive training and practice for using the technology to the relevant park officers. (iii) Community-based Ecotourism Up to December 2020, the program as guided by the project document (the PAM and AWP) has constructed a number of ecotourism facilities such as boardwalk, information center and toilet in the national park where the community-based ecotourism is going to be located. The program will continue to construct additional facilities in the later period such as guest house, gate, hiking trail and mosques.

However, promoting and developing of community-based ecotourism is not only constructing ecotourism facilities but more importantly is equipping the community with soft skills and knowledge of ecotourism. The concept of ecotourism also different with mass tourism. The concept is associated with certain degree of education of nature and social-culture and limit the number of visitors in line with carrying capacity of the ecosystem.

The key issues for developing business of ecotourism is not only providing the visitors with scenic area and wildlife species and social cultures but also entertaining them with wholehearted hospitality and services. There are also additional flavors which probably make memorable for the visitors such as local food, unique and natural products of handicraft, homey, cleanness, hygienist of places to stay.

To promote the ecotourism in the project area into flourish a number of the MHAs or local community should be equipped with (a) the attitude to serve the visitors, (b) hospitality, (c) cleanness and good sanitation system (d) ecosystem services which include but not limited to common information of the key species in the area i.e., birds, primates, herpetofauna and trees, (f) knowledge of local social culture and (ie) safety of the area, (g) knowledge of forest management and business and leadership. (iv) Livelihood Program The program which started in January 2019 has been implemented in 13 villages in the project sites. As suggested in the project document, the program consists of developing beekeeping, promoting home garden for self-subsistence, upscaling business on freshwater aquaculture and reviving and marketing local handicraft. Up to December 2020, the program has provided the participants with numerous skills and knowledge related to agriculture, beekeeping and weaving techniques. The project has also handed 11 fish draying equipment to the MHAs who engaged with aquaculture. All together the program has been participated by 1,756 households of which 544 are women.

Despite of the success, in order to optimize the program and to facilitate the MHA in improving economic scale, the project should start promoting the creation of:

(a) Badan Usaha Desa-BUD or cooperative to organize business and marketing livelihood products; (b) Facilitate for drafting benefit sharing mechanism between respective MHAs and the BUD or the cooperative; (c) Facilitate the engagement with relevant specialist on product diversification, innovation, processing and packaging; (d) Facilitate the engagement with marketing network i.e. handicraft and dried fish.

(v) Small-scale Infrastructure As indicated in the previous section, most of infrastructure development has been implemented as planned and the program appear to be on course. However, noting that there were a number of registered complaints (148 items) related to infrastructure development such as malfunction of facilities and unpunctuality of labor payment indicated that there were practical problems in delivering the program. To assure that such a problem will no longer happening in the future, the project and the IA should carefully manage the implementation of the program. (vi) Capacity Building The program has delivered numerous of capacity building topics for the MHAs in the project sites covering green school curriculum, REDD+ awareness, SFM, ecosystem services, organization development, FPIC, GRM and gender inclusion. The program also has been participated by 1,388 MHA community from the project sites. However, there are issues that appear to be left out in the implementation and required to be corrected; (a) assessment prior to and post of capacity building event and (b) the availability of training modules for each topic.

The first activity seems to be simple but is vital as it could help to obtain feedback from the audiences which includes quality of curriculum and trainers and the capacity building event. Likewise, training module is pivotal for the program as it provides reference, standard and guide for trainer, trainee and training of trainer. Because of that importance, in the later period, the project should consider to implement the two aforementioned issues. (vii) Funding Funding supports for the programs related to MHAs are allocated in different IAs. For instance, support for the program of land-based intervention is allocated in the Balai Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (BPHP) while funding for organizing MHAs and integration of land-based into SF is allocated in Balai Perhutanan Social dan Kemitraan Lingkungan (BPHL). In spite of seemingly a challenge in funding disbursement, due to the access restriction in gathering financial data to the IAs, analysis on funding implementation is carried out and hence not presented in this report.

The Appendices

Appendix 1. Dossier of FPIC related to project introduction and GRM in a number of villages in the project areas (Berita Acara Konsultasi Bermaknas untuk pengenalan proyek FIP-1 di beberapa desa di wilayah kerja Proyek FIP-1)

Appendix 2. FPIC of the project in Desa Vega, District of Kapuas Hulu on 4 September 2018

— Minutes of Meeting —

Project Nomor Grant ADB 0501-INO Topic/Subject FPIC Porest Invesment Program Desa Vega Day/Date Rabu, 07 November 2018 Time 19.00 – 23.30 Location Kantor Desa Vega Tim PISU FIP-1 : Fajri Nailus Subchi (FNS), Mulyadi (Mul), Siti Rofiah (SR) Attendances Masyarakat : 35 peserta Hasil diskusi FPIC Desa Vega  Penjelasan Materi (Mulyadi) o Keinginan dari program ini adalah masyarakat dapat menerima langsung manfaat dari program, yang kemudian akan dapat meningkatkan perekonomian masyarakat di desa ini. o Kegiatan ini sebenarnya di danai oleh Asean Development Bank (ADB) atau bank asia yang berkedudukan di Manila negara Filipina. ADB bekerjasama dengan Pemerintah Indonesia untuk memperbaiki hutan di Indonesia dengan cara meningkatkan perekonomian masyarakat. Pemerintah Indonesia berjanji untuk mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca (GRK). Sehingga banyak dukungan dari luar yang membantu keinginan pemerintah untuk mengurangi emisi GRK di Indonesia. o Program ini GOAL besarnya adalah Investasi Berfokus pada Masyarakat untuk Mengurangi Deforestasi dan Degradasi Hutan. Atau sederhananya kegiatan ini mencegah agar hutan tidak rusak. o Hasil atau output yang ingin dicapai dari kegiatan yang berada pada tingkat desa adalah pilot REDD+ yang berfokus pada masyarakat dan responsif gender di Kapuas Hulu dan Sintang. Kegiatan apapun yang dilakukan tanpa pelibatan masyarakat maka tidak akan berhasil capaian yang diinginkan. Rangkaian kegiatan dari pada hasil yang ingin dicapai pada tingkat desa diantaranya:  Serapan karbon. Untuk kegiatan serapan karbon dilakukan penanaman pohon dengan pola agroforestry. Namun, jenis tanamannya dapat disesuaikan dengan kebutuhan masyarakat.  Pengurangan emisi. Adalah kegiatan yang dilakukan, namun tidak menyebabkan terlepasnya emisi GRK di atmosfer. Contohnya: bertani tanpa bakar.  Intervensi mata pencarian. Harus dipikirkan mata pencarian yang akan dilakukan kedepan. Contohnya: kelompok ibu-ibu bikin kerajinan tangan, dll.  Peningkatan kapasitas masyarakat. Contohnya: bisa dalam bentuk pelatihan/training untuk meningkatkan kapasitas masyarakat.  Perlindungan hutan. Contohnya: patroli kawasan hutan berbasis masyarakat, dll.

o Rangkaian kegiatan yang akan dilakukan di Desa Vega terdiri dari 3 point besar sebagai berikut:  Kegiatan bebasis lahan di Desa Vega berupa agroforestry tanaman kopi/karet 110 ha. Namun, kegiatan dan jenis tanaman ini harus disesuaikan dengan peraturan yang ada sesuai yang ada di dalam kawasan Taman Nasional Danau Sentarum.  Kegiatan tidak berbasis lahan di Desa Vega berupa kerajinan tangan dan pengeringan ikan.  Kegiatan dukungan lain berupa perbaikan jalan lebar 2 meter dan panjang 2 km, serta pembangunan sarana air bersih.  Pengembangan ekowisata di Taman Nasional Danau Sentarum dengan melibatkan masyarakat setempat

Pak Rahman (kepala resort Vega) o Kegiatan agroforestry dapat dilakukan di Zona Khusus. Di sekitar pemukiman masyarakat merupakan Zona Khusus. o Ada lahan bekas terbakar yang bisa digunakan untuk alokasi agroforestry. o Kami siap mendukung kegiatan ekowisata di tempat kami

Pak Ibrahim o Menurut saya tanaman karet cocok ditanam disini.

Pak Sudirmu o Kopi juga bisa ditanam disini, tapi ditanam di atas bukit. Namun, permasalahan berikutnya adalah kepastian pasar, kemana akan dijual? o Bagaimana memasarkan program ekowisata?

Pak Fajri o Di Indonesia masih kekurangan kopi, tanaman kopi masih perlu naungan. o Pada fokusnya kegiatan berbasis lahan tidak boleh membuka lahan baru. o Untuk jenis tanaman bisa didiskusikan/disepakati bersama. o Bapak dan Ibu perlu mempuas perjanjian kerja sama agroforestry dengan pihak Taman Nasional Danau Sentarum, sebagai legalitas. o Pengeringan ikan akan ada alat pengeringan, sudah dipesan untuk Desa Vega. o Untuk perbaikan jalan, tidak bisa membuat jalan baru. Hanya perbaikan saja sepanjang 2 km dan lebar 2 m.

Ibu Siti Aminah o Jalan kebun apakah bisa diusulkan untuk program ini?

Pak Fajri o Bisa saja, tapi bukan pembuatan jalan baru. Kemungkinan akan terlaksana di tahun 2019/2020. o Menurut bapak dan ibu yang ada disini apakah program FIP 1 ini bisa diterima di Desa Vega? o Bagaimana soal sejarah di desa ini, sejak tahun berapa desa ini terbentuk/didirikan?

Pak Sinaryo (kades Vega) o Program ini bisa diterima di Desa Vega. Karena membantu meningkatkan perekonomian masyarakat. o Penghuni disini sudah ada sejak zaman penjajah.

Pak Rahman o Pada tahun 1950 sekitar 7 – 8 KK tinggal disini. o Tahun 1970 sudah ada ketua nelayan (Abdullah). o Tahun 1950 – 1970 masih kampung nelayan. o Dulunya kampung ini bergabung dengan Desa Mawan. o Pada tahun 2007 pemekaran menjadi Desa Vega. o Pada awalnya Desa Nibung terdiri dari 3 dusun; Dusun Mawan, Dusun Vega Dusun Nibung.

Pak Ardiman o Lahan disini merupakan warisan turun temurun dari nenek moyang. o Lahan kosong disini sudah ada yang memiliki. o Pengakuan atas tanah berdasarkan SKT.

Pak Jumali o Dulunya disini sungai masih warisan, namun sekarang tidak ada warisan lagi, tetapi berdasarkan undian.

Ibu Asni o Pohon lalau disini masih diwariskan. o Sawah disini ada tanah warisan, punya keluarga. Namun, tidak ada biaya sewa menyewa. Misim tanam padi pada bulan 3 – 6. o Disini belum ada jual beli tanah. o Pembentukan perjanjian kerja sama masyarakat Desa Vega dengan pihak TNDS terkait agroforestry. Next Step Action o Pemilihan jenis tanaman yang sesuai dengan peraturan yang telah ditentukan.

Documentation

Appendix 3. Minute of Meeting on Social Forestry-Community Based Forest Management

BRIEFNOTS SOCIAL FORESTRY PROGRAM APPROACH FOR THE FIP-1’S COMMUNITY BASED FOREST MANAGEMET

(Minutes of Meeting from the CBFM Workshop, Jakarta, 26 June 2019)

INTRODUCTION

The FIP-1 project has an outcome to improve the implementation of REDD + at the subnational level in West Kalimantan Province with indicators of reduced GHG emissions of a 3.7 million tons of CO2e. (2017-2026) and an increase in community income at the project site by 20% compare to the baseline situation (2016). One of the activities to support this outcome is Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) covering an area of 17,000 Ha in the Villages where the FIP-1 project is located. CBFM activities are key activities to ensure the sustainability of the project after the end of the FIP-1 project duration. Where, through CBFM activities, the government provide a legal basis to have an access over the land within the project area. Based on directions from the FIP-1 Executing Agency, CBFM is directed in to the Social Forestry scheme. FIP-1 can contribute in increasing the target of the national target of 12.7 Ha Social Forestry area listed in the National RPJM (Medium term national development target) 2019 to 2024.

CBFM is a system and paradigm in forest management. Currently the CBFM program is summarized in the Social Forestry (PS) policy which is the target of the 2014 - 2019 National Medium Term Development Plan (RPJMN), and is continued in the 2019 – 2024 period, targeting a total area of 12.7 million hectares. To make this happen, Minister of Environment and Forestry (Permen LHK) Regulation P.83 / 2016 has developed a Social Forestry program. In the MOEF Decree No. P.83 / 2016 it is explained that the Social Forestry Scheme covers Village Forests, Community Forests, Community Plantation Forests, Private Forests, Customary Forests and Forestry Partnerships. Social forestry is a system of sustainable forest management implemented in state forests or customary forests / customary forests implemented by local communities or customary law communities as the main actors to improve their welfare, environmental balance and social cultural dynamics.

Objectivs

The specific objectives of CBFM activities in the Social Forestry scheme for FIP-1 Project are as follows: 1. Facilitation to encourage the issuance of new licenses covering ± 8,000 Ha in Nanga Sangan Village, Tanjung Lasa Village, and Sungai Uluk Palin Village. 2. Facilitation to encourage the issuance of new 5,000 hectares in five villages in Sintang. 3. Facilitate the 4,000 Ha of Conservation Partnership in the TNBKDS. Overview of Area Target Area within two FMUs in Kapuas Hulu which have not yet obtained Social Forestry License: Potential Area for No. Village Notes Social Forestry KAPUAS HULU (NORTH KAPUAS HULU AND SOUTH KAPUAS HULU FMUs) 1. Batu Lintang 4,068 Ha Batu Lintang almost got the Tenurial Forest (Hutan Adat) with total area of 7,660 Ha in Sungai Utik hamlet. The 4,068 is outside of the currently proposed for the Hutan Adat 2. Nanga Sangan 1,029 Ha Nangan Sangan has already occupied by a plantation permit. The potential area for Social Forestry is through Forest Partnership with the License holder.

Potential Area for No. Village Notes Social Forestry 3. Sungai Uluk Palin 8,049 Ha People at S Uluk Palin prefer to have the Hutan Adat License, although this is the most complicated process among other Social Forestry schemes. FIP-1 will have further consultation to propose the Village Forest License. 4. Tanjung Lasa 2,724 Ha Will be proposed as Village Forest License. SINTANG DISTRICT (NORTH SINTANG FMU) 5. Kayu Dujung 4,757 Ha Potential for Village Forest 6. Tanjung Sari 1,135 Ha Potential for Community Plantation or Community 7. Radin Jaya 5,596 Ha PoForetenst ial for Village Forest 8. Senangan Kecil 1,514 Ha Potential for Community Plantation or Community 9. Senangan Jaya 1,902 Ha PoForetenst ial for Community Plantation or Community BETUNG KERIHUN AND DANAU SENTARUM NATIONFAoreL PsAt RK 10. Vega 4,300 Ha All villages within the National Park will be directed toward a conservation partnership scheme. This is also 11. Pulau Majang 750 Ha part of the Social Forestry Scheme in the MOEF Decree 12. Tanjung Lokang - No. 83/2016 13. Bungan Jaya -

Notes: the total area may changed based on further consultation with community.

GENERAL PLAN FOR CBFM WITH SOCIAL FORESTRY APPROACH

1. Community Training: This activity is an effort to increase the capacity of Village Facilitators so that they have the ability to facilitate the preparation of proposals for submission of social forestry according to the scheme agreed in the village. This activity will be followed by FIP-1 village facilitators who are the target of proposing social forestry.

2. Meaningful Consultation: This activity is an effort to provide understanding to the community so that they have a comprehensive understanding of social forestry. Furthermore, through the village meeting the community has a scheme that is in accordance with the conditions in their respective villages. This activity will invite village officials including head of the household unit (RT/RW) level, village government, community leaders, women group, FMU, and community organizations.

3. Facilitation Process for Proposal Development: This activity will be carried out by the Village Facilitator in helping the community prepare proposals for social forestry submission. The results of this activity will be in the form of a submission proposal and the required documents.

4. Submission of Proposal to MOEF: This activity will be carried out by the community through village institutions that has been established during the meaningful consultation, assisted by PISU or expert from BPSKL to present and submit the proposals to MOEF.

5. Verification and Obtaining License for SF Scheme: This activity includes discussion and verification of the submission proposal facilitated by Social Forestry Working Group and a team from MOEF, coordinated by BPSKL. Routine communication is carried out so that the gaps of the submitted documents can be immediately completed and corrected.

ESTIMATED TIMEFRAME (EXPECTED TO START IN 2020 UNTIL 2021)

2020 2021 No. Activity Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 1. Preparation (revision of RKA/KL at BPSKL, finalizing the TOR) 2. Pre-survey in the village: village profiling, initila consultation (parallel in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu) 3. Community Training (Parallel in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu) 4. Meaningful consultation on Social Forestry Scheme 5. Facilitation Process for Proposal Development 6. Submission of Proposal to MOEF 7. Verification and Obtaining License for SF Scheme

CURRENT SITUATION AND READINESS OF PARTIES a. PISU is preparing the plan for the pre-condition survey and will start in July. Target for completion is end of July. The result of the precondition survey will be used to implement the CBFM/Social Forestry scheme by BPSKL. b. Budget has been allocated under BPSKL and now is being included into the DIPA revision (internal revision so it will not take long to finish, one week. Estimated to finish by next week or end of June). c. Budget for BPSKL will cover CBFM for both Kapuas Hulu and Sintang, outside of TNBKDS. Targeting a total of 13,000 Ha. d. TNBKDS has submitted a topup application to MOEF that include CBFM through a conservation partnership scheme, targeting a 4,000 Ha. e. Once the top up is approved, TNBKDS will start the activities in July/August 2020.

LIST OF MEETING ATTENDANCE: 1. Executing Agency, Dir. of BUPSHA, MOEF 2. Dir. of KPHP, MOEF 3. Dir. of PJLHK, MOEF 4. Head of BPSKL Kalimantan Area, MOEF 5. Head of BPHP Area VIII Pontianak, MOEF 6. Head of BBTNBKDS, Putussibau, West Kalimantan 7. FMU North Kapuas Hulu 8. FMU South Kapuas Hulu 9. FMU North Sintang 10. Office of Forestry, West Kalimantan Province 11. Bogor Agroculture University 12. PCU 13. PMU 14. PISU 15. ADB

Appendix 4. Copy of Surat Perjanjian Kerjasama (SPKS) antara Balai Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan Wilayah Kalimantan dan Kelompok Adang Makmur (Partnership Agreement between BPSKL -Implementing Agency and Farmer Group of Adang Makmur related to integration of their (occupied) land into agroforestry program).

Appendix 5. Example of Information Materials (leaflet) Disseminated to Community and Public. a) Social Safeguard Brochure

b) Gender brochure in local Dayak language

Appendix 6. GRM Form for reporting grievance to the head of village or PISU officer of the Project FIP 1 Community-Focused Investment to Address deforestation and Forest Degradation

Form of grievance for the FIP-1 Project

Diisi oleh Warga pelapor/ Fill by the affected person Nama/ Name : Alamat/ Address : No HP/ Mobile Phone No : Melapor secara pribadi atau atas nama orang lain/Personal report or on behalf of : Pribadi/Personal Orang lain/On behalf of someone else (coret salah satu/ tick one someone esle of the two) Apabila melaporkan atas nama orang lain sebutkan nama YBS/ If you are : reporting on behalf of someone else, identify her/his name Alamat/ Address : No HP/ Mobile Phone No : Masalah/ Problem : Kegiatan/ Activity : Lokasi/Location : Waktu kejadian/Date of Occurence : Keluhan/ Complaint :

Nama dan Tanda tangan Pelapor/ Name : and signature of the affected person

Diisi oleh Petugas (Kepala Desa/ Petugas PISU)/ Fill out by head of the village/ PISU officer) Keluhan No/Complaint No. : Nama penerima laporan/ Name of the : report recorder/ recipient Waktu dan tempat/ Date and place : Tanda tangan petugas / kepala Desa/ : Petugas PISU

Appendix 6 (Continued). Schematic of GRM Procedure of the FIP-1. Community-Focused Investment to address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project Appendix 10b. Schematic of GRM Procedure of the FIP-1 Community-Focused Investment to address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project

Grievance of Affected MHA Head of Village or PISU at site office

Registered and Verified (1 day)

No Stop Yes

Review, Investigate, Yes Mediation (7 days)

o Review, Investigate,

m Mediation in PISU at

n Yes District office

t (7 days)

o No

w Review, Investigate,

d Yes Mediation in PCU office in

e Pontianak

t Court t (7 days)

S NoNo

Review, Investigate, Yes Mediation in EA office in No Jakarta (7 days)

Appendix 6 (continued). Mekanisme/ Prosedur Penyelesaian Pengaduan FIP-1- GRM Procedure and Mechanisms