DOCSLIB.ORG

The Westland District Council Will Not Gain an Advantage in Trade Competition Through Making a Further Submission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Further Submission - Westland District Council FURTHER SUBMISSION To PROPOSED RPS WEST COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL PO Box 66 GREYMOUTH 7840 Further submission made under Schedule I, Part I Section 8 of the Resource Management Act 1,991. FURTHER SUBMISSION OF: Westland District Council Private Bag 704 HOKITIKA 7842 Contact Person: Rebecca Be aumont District Planner Westland District Council Private Bag 704 Hokitika 7842 Telephone: (03) 7569086 Email: rebecca. be aumont@westlanddc. govt. nz The Westland District Council will not gain an advantage in trade competition through making a further submission. The Westland District Council does wish to be heard in su ort of their submission and would consider presenting a joint case with others who have made a similar submission. ^ , . Goel Acting Chief Execu Ive Date: 18 I 11 12015 Further Submission - Westland District Council This is a further submission on the following: The submissions lodged by the following parties with regards to The Proposed West Coast Regional Policy Statement: I. Amalgamated Mining Ltd; 1.0 - William Burton; 1.3 - Chris I Coll Surveying Ltd; 1.5 - Yvonne Davison; 16 - Department of Conservation; 20 - Eldon Mining Limited; 22 - Grey District Council; 24 - Go West Coast; 26 - Heritage New Zealand; 27 - Heritage West Coast; 41. - MOSman Oil and Gas Limited; 43 - Minerals West Coast; 47 - Inger Perkins; 50 - Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand inc; 57 - Te Runanga o Ng5i Tahu; 58 - GBreth Thomas; and 62 - Justin Venable. The reasons for the further submission are detailed in the below table I. Reasonable Development in reviewing the submissions lodged on the Proposed West Coast Regional Policy Statement (RPS) the Westland District Council (WDC) noted submissions that included a similar vein of support in ensuring the development and enhancement of the West Coast and that well managed activities can occur on the West Coast without adversely impacting on other opportunities. With this in mind the following submissions are submitted on: Original submission reference Person, or organisation, (Number in the making original I ^gp^: or g^g^ the relief sought in the original submission Summary of submission (please give reasons) Decisions Requested e. g. GS 3 or 4.56) Summary No: GS I - Amalgamated Mining We submit in ^^991t of p^t of the submissions. I Ltd (AML) 13 - Chris J Coll Surveying The Westland District Council (WDC) has lodged a submission on Submission No's Ltd (COLL) the Proposed Regional Policy Statement. in section I of the WDC I, 13,20,24,41, 20 - Eldon Mining Limited submission (Page 3) the WDC supports the themes and concepts in 43 & 58 (EML) the RPS that will, together with other factors, lead to the 24 - Go West Coast strengthening and revitalisation of the West Coast. (GowC) 41 - MOSman Oil and Gas The seven submissions identified have commented that they are Limited (MOGL) particularly heartened by the focus not only on the environment 43 - Minerals West Coast but also economic, community and the social well being of the (MWC) West Coast. 58 - Gareth Thomas (THOMG) The WDC also supports the need to explicitly include consideration of the economic, community and social well being of the West Coast. 2 Further Submission - Westland District Coundl . J Original submission .. , ,. reference ,... Person, or organisation, INuijib!:r in the making <1riginal ' I ^!!^g:t or ^12pg^^ the relief sought in the. original submission Summary'of ' . submission (please give reasons) - . ' . ., Decisions .., Requested e. g. GS ^ of 4561' ' . Summary No: GS I - Amalgamated Mining We submit in g^^LLCf p^r^ of the submissions. 3 Ltd (AM L) 13 - Chris I Coll Surveying The Westland District Council (WDC) has lodged a submission on Submission No's Ltd (COLLj the Proposed Regional Policy Statement. In section 2 of the WDC I, 1.3,20,24,41, 20 . Eldon Mining Limited submission (Page 5) the fifth paragraph highlights that on the West 43 & 58 (EML) Coast we should do things well and activities can have far different 24 - Go West Coast effects depending on how they are undertaken and managed. (Gowc) 41. - MOSman Oil and Gas The seven submissions identified have included that they support Limited IMOGL) the concept of responsible development of West Coast natural 43 - Minerals West Coast resources. (MWC) 58 - Gareth Thomas The WDC also supports this concept and suggests it should be (THOMG) explored further as to how such concepts could be incorporated and promoted through the RPS. 2. Heritage in reviewing the submissions lodged on the Proposed West Coast Regional Policy Statement (RPS) the Westland District Council (WDC) noted submissions that highlighted the need to include heritage for both statutory reasons and also due to the importance of heritage on the West Coast. This is similar to the WDC submission previously lodged. With this in mind the following submissions are submitted on: Originalsubmission reference INumber in the Summary of Person, or organisation, I ^^pp. g^ or 99^^ the relief sought in the original submission (please Decisions making original submission give reasons) Requested e. g. GS 3 or 4,561 Decision 1.0 - William Burton We^999z! the relief soughtin p^r: of the submissions as they Requested GS 36, (BURTW) relate to heritage. GS 43,1.18,4.17, 1.5 - Yvonne Davison 4.41,4.64,4.89, 10AVIY) The WDC sought in their submission at section 3 that greater 4.127,4.1.60, 16 - Department of recognition of heritage should occur and that this should include 7.31,7.35,7.45, Conservation IDOC) the insertion of a heritage chapter in the RPS. 7.53,7,128,9.52, 26 - Heritage New Zealand 15.1,15.2,1.5.3, (HNZ) The various submissions identified have submitted that the matter 15.4,15.6 & 15.7 27 - Heritage West Coast of heritage needs to be better addressed in the RPS. This includes (HWC) recognition of the requirements of the Resource Management Act Submitters 10, 1.5, 50 - Royal Forest and Bird 1991 by some submitters and others that comment that there are 1.6,26,27,50,57, Protection Society of New significant heritage features within the Region. Comment is made 62, Zealand inc IRF&B) that the West Coast in dudes a unique built heritage and a 57 - Te ROnanga o Ng^I comprehensive list of all places and structures needs to be actively Tahu (TRONT) sought. Linkages are also demonstrated through reference to 62 - Justin Venable cultural and heritage values in duding via cultural landscapes (VENN) 3 Further Submission - Westland District Council These submissions are consistent with the intentions and relief sought by the WDC and accordingly the WDC submits in support of these submissions. 3. Wastewater & Solid Waste in reviewing the submissions lodged on the RPS the WDC noted the submission of the Grey District Council re ardin the disposal of solid waste and hazardous material. Given that the WDC provides similar functions includ' t disposal the Grey District Council submission has highlighted the need to explore this issue further. With this in mind the Grey District Council submission is submitted on as follows: Original submission reference (Number in the Summary of Person, or organisation, I ^!!1,292t or gppggg the relief sought in the original submission IPIease Decisions making originalsubmission give reasons) Requested e. g. GS 3 or 4,561 Dedsion Grey District Council We submit in ^.!!PRgrt of the relevantp^z^ of the submission as it Requested 13.8 relates to those matters discussed below. Submitter No. 22 The submission of the Grey District Council seeks that regional Iy significant infrastructure, as referred to in the RPS, should include hazardous and solid waste (refuse) collection and disposal, including recycling. The WDC also operates and manages waste transfer and disposal facilities and accordingly the same issues arise such that it is agreed that provision for such activities should be included in the RPS to reflect the needs of District Coundls in managing the recycling and disposal of waste. Accordingly the WDC submits in support of the relevant part of this submission. 4. Best Practice in reviewing the submissions lodged on the RPS the WDC has identified a submission that highli hts the need to employ best practice. This issue is similar in vein to the submission lodged by the WDC. With this in mind the submission of Inger Perkins is submitted on as follows: Original submission reference Person, or organisation, INumber in the making original I ^^^grt or gpp^g the relief sought in the original submission Summary of submission IPIease give reasons) Decisions Requested e. g. GS 3 or 4.56) Decision inger Perkins We submitin ^. gp99n ofp^. c: of the submission by inger Perkins. Requested 4,113 The Westland District Council (WDC) has lodged a submission on Submitter No. 47 the Proposed Regional Policy Statement. In section 2 of the WDC 4 Further Submission - Westland District Council submission (Page 5) the fifth paragraph highlights that on the West Coast we should do things well and activities can have far different effects depending on how they are undertaken and managed. The submission of Inger Perkins includes that the RPS should support best management practices for all development and resource use. The WDC also supports this concept and suggests it should be explored further as to how such concepts could be incorporated and promoted through the RPS. 5. Natural Hazards in reviewing the submissions lodged on the RPS the WDC has identified a submission that is consistent with the WDC's opinion and suggestions, by way of submission, regarding the issue of natural hazards. The submission lodged by the Department of Conservation (Doc) is similar in vein as it both supports the current provisions and suggests improvements.
Recommended publications
  • Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington

    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington

    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington September 2017 ISBN 978-0-9941409-4-4 (PDF) Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington About the Author As an American living in New Zealand, I’ve been observing the debate here on immigration and multiculturalism. I arrived in Wellington last year with my Kiwi husband and three-year old son – and while settling in we’ve spent a lot of time discovering the delights of the city and its people. The experience also gave me some perspective on being a migrant far from home. I have a professional interest in South East Asian history, languages and culture - I just completed a PhD on the subject. I speak some Filipino, and am fascinated by the Philippines’ complex history. One of the major phenomena in the Philippines since the 1970s has been the growth of the global Filipino diaspora. That story has often been full of sadness. So I was intrigued by anecdotes of positivity and success from Wellington. Writing about how the migrant Filipino community has settled in New Zealand has been more than just a research project. It has highlighted how migration plays a role in community building. It also has meaning for me and my family’s future here. I really wanted to share some of the stories that I think reflect successful outcomes from immigration over the past thirty years. By Dr Rebecca Townsend 1 Key Points 1. 2. 3. Filipinos comprise 1 percent of Filipinos are a vital part of Most Filipinos in New Zealand are New Zealand’s population – the New Zealand’s dairy, healthcare, not Overseas Filipino Workers third largest Asian ethnic group construction, nursing, aged care, (OFW).
  • Exposure to Coastal Flooding

    Exposure to Coastal Flooding

    Coastal Flooding Exposure Under Future Sea-level Rise for New Zealand Prepared for The Deep South Challenge Prepared by: Ryan Paulik Scott Stephens Sanjay Wadhwa Rob Bell Ben Popovich Ben Robinson For any information regarding this report please contact: Ryan Paulik Hazard Analyst Meteorology and Remote Sensing +64-4-386 0601 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Private Bag 14901 Kilbirnie Wellington 6241 Phone +64 4 386 0300 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: 2019119WN Report date: March 2019 NIWA Project: DEPSI18301 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Michael Allis Formatting checked by: Patricia Rangel Approved for release by: Dr Andrew Laing © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 6 1 Context for estimating coastal flooding exposure with rising seas ............................. 14 1.1 Coastal flooding processes in a changing climate .................................................. 14 1.2 National and regional coastal flooding exposure ..................................................
  • Two Ex-Tropical Cyclones Impact New Zealand

    Two Ex-Tropical Cyclones Impact New Zealand

    New Zealand Climate Summary: February 2018 Issued: 5 March 2018 Two ex-Tropical Cyclones Impact New Zealand Temperature Mean temperatures were above average (0.51 to 1.20°C of average) or well above average (>1.20°C of average) across the North Island. Temperatures were more than 2°C above the February average for parts of Hawke’s Bay, Gisborne, and across lower Manawatu-Whanganui. In the South Island, temperatures were above average across the north and mostly near average (-0.50 to 0.50°C) across the central and south. Rainfall Rainfall was well above normal (>149% of normal) across much of the upper North Island, Wellington-Wairarapa, the upper South Island, Canterbury and Otago. Elsewhere, rainfall was above normal (120-149% of normal) or near normal (80-119% of normal). Soil Moisture As of 28 February, soils were wetter than normal for the time of year across the upper North Island and the central and upper South Island. Soil moisture was near normal elsewhere; although parts of Hawke’s Bay, Gisborne, and Southland had slightly below normal soil moisture. Click on the link to jump to the information you require: Overview Temperature Rainfall February 2018 climate in the six main centres Highlights and extreme events Overview February 2018 was marked by two ex-Tropical Cyclones, Fehi and Gita, that impacted New Zealand on the 1st and 20th of the month, respectively. These two storms contributed to lower than normal sea level pressure that extended from the tropics to the north of New Zealand and southward across the country.
  • Council Agenda

    Council Agenda

    MASTERTON DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNCIL AGENDA WEDNESDAY 28 OCTOBER 2020 3.00 PM MEMBERSHIP Her Worship (Chairperson) Cr G Caffell Cr B Gare Cr D Holmes Cr B Johnson Cr G McClymont Cr F Mailman Cr T Nelson Cr T Nixon Cr C Peterson Cr S Ryan Noce is given that a meeng of the Masterton District Council will be held at 3.00pm on Wednesday 28 October 2020 at Waiata House, 27 Lincoln Rd, Masterton. RECOMMENDATIONS IN REPORTS ARE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS COUNCIL POLICY UNTIL ADOPTED 22 October 2020 Values 1. Public interest: members will serve the best interests of the people within the Masterton district and discharge their duties conscientiously, to the best of their ability. 2. Public trust: members, in order to foster community confidence and trust in their Council, will work together constructively and uphold the values of honesty, integrity, accountability and transparency. 3. Ethical behaviour: members will not place themselves in situations where their honesty and integrity may be questioned, will not behave improperly and will avoid the appearance of any such behaviour. 4. Objectivity: members will make decisions on merit; including appointments, awarding contracts, and recommending individuals for rewards or benefits. 5. Respect for others: will treat people, including other members, with respect and courtesy, regardless of their ethnicity, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. Members will respect the impartiality and integrity of Council staff. 6. Duty to uphold the law: members will comply with all legislative requirements applying to their role, abide by this Code, and act in accordance with the trust placed in them by the public.
  • THE HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND QUARTERLY UPDATE the New Zealand Heritage List / Rārangi Kōrero

    THE HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND QUARTERLY UPDATE the New Zealand Heritage List / Rārangi Kōrero

    THE HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND QUARTERLY UPDATE The New Zealand Heritage List / Rārangi Kōrero 28 April 2021 This is the first issue of the Heritage New Zealand Quarterly Update following the distribution of the Heritage New Zealand Annual Information on 20 January 2021. This update contains decisions on entries on the New Zealand Heritage List / Rārangi Kōrero (‘the List’) made at the Board and Māori Heritage Council meetings of 18 th February 2021 and Rārangi Kōrero Committee meetings of 28 th January 2021 and 18 th March 2021. The decisions relate to new entries, technical changes to existing entries, and reviews. This update also includes new proposals for entries on the List and heritage covenants. The next Quarterly Update will be issued in July 2021 covering the period April-June 2021. If you have not received your Heritage New Zealand Annual Information, please email [email protected] . Annie James Listing Advisor for Dr Michelle Horwood Manager Heritage Listing DDI (04) 470 8059 Email: [email protected] LOCAL AUTHORITIES: a copy of the Heritage New Zealand Annual Information should be kept at the front desk for the public to review on request. In This Quarterly Update Caution 2 Disclaimer 2 Exclusion of Liability 2 What’s New 3 New Listings 4 Covenants 11 Contact Details 17 Caution Heritage New Zealand advises persons searching the List in all cases, where possible, to utilise street address or the location description as a search reference. The names of places entered on the List should be carefully checked as the List often uses the historical names, particularly when a place or area is associated with an historical person, business, industry or past use.
  • New Zealand's Hottest Summer on Record

    New Zealand's Hottest Summer on Record

    New Zealand Climate Summary: Summer 2017-18 Issued: 5 March 2018 New Zealand’s hottest summer on record Temperature Hottest summer on record. The nation-wide average temperature for summer 2017- 18 was 18.8°C (2.1°C above the 1981-2010 from NIWA’s seven station temperature series which began in 1909). Summer temperatures were well above average (>1.20°C above the summer average) across all regions. Rainfall Highly variable from month to month and heavily impacted by two ex-tropical cyclones during February. Summer rainfall in the South Island was above normal (120- 149%) or well above normal (>149%) over Canterbury, Marlborough, Nelson, and Tasman, and near normal (80-119%) to below normal (50-79%) around Otago, Southland, and the West Coast. North Island summer rainfall was above or well-above normal around Wellington and much of the upper North Island, and near normal or below normal over remaining North Island locations including Taranaki, Manawatu- Wanganui, Hawke’s Bay, and Gisborne. Soil moisture As of 28 February, soils were wetter than normal for the time of year across the upper North Island and the central and upper South Island. Soil moisture was near normal elsewhere, although parts of Hawke’s Bay, Gisborne, and Southland had slightly below normal soil moisture. Click on the link to jump to the information you require: Overview Temperature Rainfall Summer climate in the six main centres Highlights and extreme events Overview Summer 2017-18 was New Zealand’s hottest summer on record. Overall, the season was characterised by mean sea level pressures that were higher than normal to the east and southeast of New Zealand, and lower than normal over and to the west of the country.
  • Three Waters

    Three Waters

    FOR DECISION MŌ TE WHAKATAUNGA TO Mayor and Councillors AUTHOR Adrian de Laborde Group Manager Engineering Services FILE REFERENCE Document: 2807302 Appendix A: Three Waters Reform Programme M2807311 Appendix B: 3 Waters Stimulus Funding Agreement M2807309 Appendix C: Simpson Grierson Advice SOLGM on MOU M2807308 Appendix D: Notional Funding Allocations M2807307 Appendix E: Eater Stimulus Delivery Plan M2807305 Appendix F: Grant Funding Guidance M2807248 PORTFOLIO HOLDER/S Councillor Ross Harris 3 Waters portfolio MEETING DATE 12 August 2020 SUBJECT Department of Internal Affairs 3-Waters Review Memorandum of Understanding SUMMARY | TE WHAKARĀPOPOTANGA This report provides an update on the Governments reform programme for 3 Waters and seeks approval for the Council to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Crown. The decision is not considered to be a significant decision. Whaarangi 1 | 8 M 2807302 RECOMMENDATION | TE WHAIKUPU THAT the report be received. THAT the Council agrees to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Crown, thus agreeing to participate in the initial stage of a central/local government three waters service delivery reform programme THAT the Council authorise the Chief Executive to enter into the Funding Agreement, to accept a grant from the Crown to spend on operating and/or capital expenditure relating to three waters infrastructure and service delivery THAT the Council considers these decisions to be insignificant under its Significance and Engagement Policy 2017. THAT the Council informs the community that the Memorandum of Understanding has been entered into. 1 PURPOSE | TE ARONGA This report provides an update to the Council on the Government’s progress on the reform of 3-Waters.
  • Westland District Council Lifelines Assets

    Westland District Council Lifelines Assets

    West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 12: Westland District Council Lifelines Assets West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group August 2017 IMPORTANT NOTES Disclaimer The information collected and presented in this report and accompanying documents by the Consultants and supplied to West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group is accurate to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Consultants acting on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. While the Consultants have exercised all reasonable skill and care in the preparation of information in this report, neither the Consultants nor West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group accept any liability in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss, damage, injury or expense, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the provision of information in this report. This report has been prepared on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group by: Ian McCahon BE (Civil), David Elms BA, MSE, PhD Rob Dewhirst BE, ME (Civil) Geotech Consulting Ltd 21 Victoria Park Road Rob Dewhirst Consulting Ltd 29 Norwood Street Christchurch 38A Penruddock Rise Christchurch Westmorland Christchurch Hazard Maps The hazard maps contained in this report are regional in scope and detail, and should not be considered as a substitute for site-specific investigations and/or geotechnical engineering assessments for any project. Qualified and experienced practitioners should assess the site-specific hazard potential, including the potential for damage, at a more detailed scale. Cover Photo: Franz Josef Oxidation Ponds, March 2016. Photo from West Coast Regional Council West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 12: Westland District Council Lifeline Assets .
  • Natural Hazard Assessment for the Township of Franz Josef, Westland District Natural Hazard Assessment for the Township of Franz

    Natural Hazard Assessment for the Township of Franz Josef, Westland District Natural Hazard Assessment for the Township of Franz

    Natural Hazard Assessment for the Township of Franz Josef, Westland District R.M. Langridge J.D. Howarth R. Buxton W.F. Ries GNS Science Consultancy Report 2016/33 July 2016 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science) exclusively for and under contract to the Envirolink Fund/West Coast Regional Council. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by GNS Science, GNS Science accepts no responsibility for any use of or reliance on any contents of this report by any person other than the Envirolink Fund/West Coast Regional Council and shall not be liable to any person other than the Envirolink Fund/West Coast Regional Council, on any ground, for any loss, damage or expense arising from such use or reliance. Use of Data: Date that GNS Science can use associated data: July 2016 BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Langridge, R.M.; Howarth, J.D.; Buxton, R., Ries, W.F. 2016. A Natural Hazard Assessment for the Township of Franz Josef, Westland District, GNS Science Consultancy Report 2016/33. 61 p. Project Number 430W4150 Confidential 2016 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... IV 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................... 2 1.2 PROJECT DESIGN .............................................................................................
  • Supplement 11 Grey District Council Lifeline Assets

    Supplement 11 Grey District Council Lifeline Assets

    West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 11 Grey District Council Lifeline Assets West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group August 2017 IMPORTANT NOTES Disclaimer The information collected and presented in this report and accompanying documents by the Consultants and supplied to West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group is accurate to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Consultants acting on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. While the Consultants have exercised all reasonable skill and care in the preparation of information in this report, neither the Consultants nor West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group accept any liability in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss, damage, injury or expense, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the provision of information in this report. This report has been prepared on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group by: Ian McCahon BE (Civil), David Elms BA, MSE, PhD Rob Dewhirst BE, ME (Civil) Geotech Consulting Ltd 21 Victoria Park Road Rob Dewhirst Consulting Ltd 29 Norwood Street Christchurch 38A Penruddock Rise Christchurch Westmorland Christchurch Hazard Maps The hazard maps contained in this report are regional in scope and detail, and should not be considered as a substitute for site-specific investigations and/or geotechnical engineering assessments for any project. Qualified and experienced practitioners should assess the site-specific hazard potential, including the potential for damage, at a more detailed scale. Cover photo: Omoto Slip, SH 7, Greymouth 1988 West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 11 Grey District Council Lifeline Assets Contents 1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................
  • Voter Turnout Statistics for Local Authorities Using Fpp for the 2013 Elections

    Voter Turnout Statistics for Local Authorities Using Fpp for the 2013 Elections

    VOTER TURNOUT STATISTICS FOR LOCAL AUTHORITIES USING FPP FOR THE 2013 ELECTIONS Total Overall Electoral voters turnout Area Authority ward Type system (N) (%) ASHBURTON DISTRICT ASHBURTON DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 6,810 53.3% AUCKLAND AUCKLAND COUNCIL All CC FPP 292,790 34.9% BAY OF PLENTY REGION BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL All RC FPP 78,938 41.0% BULLER DISTRICT BULLER DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 3,694 62.4% CARTERTON DISTRICT CARTERTON DISTRICT COUNCIL AT LARGE DC FPP 2,880 45.7% CENTRAL HAWKE'S BAY DISTRICT CENTRAL HAWKE'S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 5,151 55.2% CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 6,722 52.9% CHATHAM ISLANDS DISTRICT CHATHAM ISLANDS TERRITORY COUNCIL AT LARGE DC FPP CHRISTCHURCH CITY CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL All CC FPP 103,467 42.9% CLUTHA DISTRICT CLUTHA DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 2,707 59.8% FAR NORTH DISTRICT FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 18,308 48.9% GISBORNE DISTRICT GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 14,272 48.3% GORE DISTRICT GORE DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 3720 41.7% GREY DISTRICT GREY DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 3,193 45.3% HAMILTON CITY HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL All CC FPP 37,276 38.3% HASTINGS DISTRICT HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 19,927 47.8% HAURAKI DISTRICT HAURAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 5,375 40.4% HAWKE'S BAY REGION HAWKE'S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL All RC FPP 51,524 47.7% HOROWHENUA DISTRICT HOROWHENUA DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 11,700 52.9% HURUNUI DISTRICT HURUNUI DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 1,327 44.7% HUTT CITY HUTT CITY COUNCIL All CC FPP
  • Universal Income Education Display Schedule, Resource Updates, and Orders Supplied to Major Education Venues

    Universal Income Education Display Schedule, Resource Updates, and Orders Supplied to Major Education Venues

    UNIVERSAL INCOME EDUCATION DISPLAY SCHEDULE, RESOURCE UPDATES, AND ORDERS SUPPLIED TO MAJOR EDUCATION VENUES July 2020 – June 2021 with bookings to ... Click here for Major Education Display Schedule The Trust's thanks go out to all individuals who have requested our resources and kindly made them available at other venues or to other people during this time period. If you would like to book free displays and/or presentations for your organisation, regional formal/non-formal education centre/s, or to help stock/restock brochures in your area, please contact us for resources and more information. Email: [email protected] Phone: +64 3 545 7273 Table of Contents QUANTITY OF RESOURCES BOOKED, ORDERED, AND DOWNLOADED: as of July 2020 - June 2021...................................................................................................................4 Non-Digital Education Resources......................................................................................4 Bookings including future displays................................................................................4 Orders............................................................................................................................4 Digital Education Resources.........................................................................................4 DIGITAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR FREE DOWNLOAD: uitrustnz.org......................5 RECENT ADDITIONS TO ONLINE RESOURCES ON WEBSITE: uitrustnz.org.............5 E_Book Draft......................................................................................................................5