Theory and Interpretation of Narrative James Phelan, Peter J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Theory and Interpretation of Narrative James Phelan, Peter J View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KnowledgeBank at OSU THEORY AND INTERPRETATION OF NARRATIVE JAMES PHELAN, PETER J. RABINOWITZ, AND ROBYN WARHOL, SERIES EDITORS FOR VANESSA, MAX, AND MILLY THE RETURN OF THE OMNISCIENT NARRATOR Authorship and Authority in Twenty-First Century Fiction PAUL DAWSON THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS COLUMBUS Copyright © 2013 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dawson, Paul, 1972– The return of the omniscient narrator authorship and authority in twenty-first century fiction / Paul Dawson. pages cm—(Theory and interpretation of narrative) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8142-1233-2 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0–8142– 1233–6 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Fiction—Technique. 2. Omniscience (Theory of knowledge) in literature. 3. Narration (Rhetoric) I. Title. II. Series: Theory and interpretation of narrative series. PN3355.D246 2013 808.3—dc23 2013031509 Cover design by AuthorSupport.com Text design by Juliet Williams Type set in Adobe Sabon Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48–1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction The Return of Omniscience in Contemporary Fiction 1 CHaptER 1 Omniscience and Narrative Authority 25 CHaptER 2 The Direct Address and the Ironic Moralist 62 CHaptER 3 Prolepsis and the Literary Historian 88 CHaptER 4 Style and the Pyrotechnic Storyteller 111 CHaptER 5 Polymathic Knowledge, the Immersion Journalist, and the Social Commentator 136 CHaptER 6 Voice and Free Indirect Discourse in Contemporary Omniscient Narration 166 CHaptER 7 Paralepsis and Omniscient Character Narration 195 CHaptER 8 Real Authors and Real Readers: A Discursive Approach to the Narrative Communication Model 222 Conclusion 247 Notes 251 Works Cited 255 Index 267 AcKNOWLEDGMENTS THIS BOOK would not have been written without the support of my wife, Vanessa Dawson. From her unwavering encouragement and belief in my capacity to tackle a new field, to expert grant-writing advice, to patient sighs and glazed eyes at the mention of words such as paralepsis, she has sustained me. My research has benefited enormously from generous financial support in the form of an Australian Research Council Discovery Project grant, plus an Early Career Researcher Grant and a Faculty Research Grant from the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of New South Wales. Jim Phelan and Peter Rabinowitz have made this a better book with their comprehensive, challenging, and insightful comments. I am grateful for their enthusiasm, and for that of the external reader. I thank Sandy Crooms, too, for her warmth and help with the process of submission and publication. Much of this book was written during my time as a Visiting Scholar in the Department of English at the University of California, Berkeley. I extend my warmest thanks to Dorothy Hale, who acted as my faculty host during this period. My discussions with Dori about the novel and vii viii • AcKNOWLEDGMENTS narrative theory have each and every time been exceptionally rewarding. I have also gained much from talking with Namwali Serpell and Kent Puck- ett. I must thank Mary Mellin, who facilitated the administrative side of my time at the University of California, Berkeley, and Joanna Picciotto, who generously allowed me to use her office during my stay. I extend my gratitude to many of my colleagues in the School of the Arts and Media at the University of New South Wales. Julian Murphet and George Kouvaros both provided me with excellent mentorship dur- ing this book’s early life as a research grant proposal. John Attridge, Chris Danta, Helen Groth, Roslyn Jolly, Stephen Muecke, Sean Pryor, and Louise Ravelli have all helped me clarify my thoughts. Lee William- son was instrumental in helping me secure a grant to write this book. I must especially thank my two excellent research assistants, Lynda Ng and Grace Hellyer, who did so much grunt work on my behalf and provided sounding boards for ideas. Many of the claims in this book have been tested at annual confer- ences for the International Society for the Study of Narrative since 2008. The feedback from delegates at these conferences has been very helpful in shaping my argument. In particular I would like to thank the following Narrative Conference regulars who have discussed ideas or shown inter- est in my work: Porter Abbot, Frederick Aldama, Sarah Copland, Susan Lanser, Christine McBride, Brian McHale, Henrik Nielsen, Gerald Prince, Brian Richardson, Richard Walsh, and Robyn Warhol. Last, I want to acknowledge my wonderful whiskey-drinking friends in narrative, none of whom actually helped write this book: Matt Bolton, Lizzie Nixon, and, particularly, Emily Anderson, who is always there to help prop up the bar. Early versions of my argument have appeared in: “Historicizing ‘Craft’ in the Teaching of Fiction,” New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing 5.3 (2008); and “The Return of Omniscience in Contemporary Fiction,” Narrative 17.2 (2009). A ver- sion of chapter 8 appears as “Real Authors and Real Readers: Omniscient Narration and a Discursive Approach to the Narrative Communication Model,” Journal of Narrative Theory 42.1 (2012). INTRODUCTION The Return of Omniscience in Contemporary Fiction “What happened to the omniscient author?” Gone interactive. —Jeanette Winterson, The Powerbook 27 (2001) In the first year of the new millennium Helen published a novel which one reviewer described as “so old-fashioned in form as to be almost experimental.” It was written in the third person, past tense, with an omniscient and sometimes intrusive narrator. —David Lodge, Thinks 340 (2002) THIS QUOTE from the last paragraph of David Lodge’s novel Thinks cap- tures with ironic pithiness the central premise of this book and the para- dox it seeks to investigate. Despite long being considered a relic of the nineteenth-century novel, the ostensibly outmoded figure of the omniscient narrator has become a salient feature of contemporary British and Ameri- can literary fiction. From the 1990s, and particularly since the turn of the millennium, a number of important and popular novelists have produced books which exhibit all the formal elements we typically associate with literary omniscience: an all-knowing authorial narrator who addresses the reader directly, offers intrusive commentary on the events being narrated, ranges freely across space and time, provides access to the consciousness of characters, and generally asserts a palpable presence within the fictional world. 1 2 • INTRODUCTION These authors range from relatively new writers such as Zadie Smith, Adam Thirlwell and Nicola Barker, to established literary figures such as Jonathan Franzen, David Foster Wallace and Rick Moody, to liter- ary icons such as Tom Wolfe, Salman Rushdie, Martin Amis, and Don DeLillo. They include writers who have won or been shortlisted for two of the most significant literary prizes in the Anglo-American world, the Booker and the Pulitzer, such as David Lodge, A. S. Byatt, Gail Jones, and Edward P. Jones. Many of these writers have received sustained scholarly attention for their significance to postmodern and postcolonial fiction, and have generated much debate about the contemporary novel through their nonfiction writing, notably Wolfe, Wallace, and Franzen. Despite the critical scrutiny these writers have received, their collective contribution to the development of new modes of omniscient narration in contemporary fiction has yet to be recognized. Indeed, criticism today still seems to be in thrall to an historical narrative about the anachronicity of omniscience fostered by modernism. For instance, Timothy Aubry opens a 2008 article on the “politics of interiority” in middlebrow fiction with this claim: Although occasionally called upon to perform certain emeritus functions, the omniscient narrator has retired decisively from the scene of contem- porary United States fiction. In the place of this appealingly wise but problematic figure emerges an array of speakers no less ignorant, preju- diced, and confused than the reader. A modernist innovation origi- nally, the refusal of omniscience has become a fixed principle, especially within what is frequently referred to as middlebrow fiction. (85) Aubry’s characterization of an omniscient narrator as “appealingly wise” betrays the continued association of this narrative voice with canon- ical works of nineteenth-century fiction, and hence an unwillingness to consider how formal conventions of omniscience may have been adapted to a different historical context, invoking a different figure of authorship. One reason for the critical neglect of contemporary omniscience is that surveys of the novel today—unlike, say, Joseph Warren Beach’s The Twen- tieth Century Novel (1932)—tend to concern themselves less with formal developments than with interpretative criticism in relation to broader the- ories of nationalism, history, gender, postmodernism, and postcolonial- ism. Excursions into literary form are rare, and may be summed up by Brian Finney’s claim in his 2006 book, English Fiction Since 1984: Nar- rating a Nation, that what unites British novelists of the last two decades THE RETURN OF OMNISCIENCE IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION • 3 is a belief that “an omniscient narrator is an anachronism” (12). Even avowedly formalist and narratological accounts of contemporary fiction continue to cast omniscience as an outmoded narrative voice which writ- ers have rejected in favor of more radical experiments with form. This, for instance, is Brian Richardson’s argument in his 2006 book, Unnatural Voices. In an exhaustive survey of twentieth-century fiction, Richardson claims that there “is a general move away from what was thought to be ‘omniscient’ third-person narration to limited third-person narration to ever more unreliable first-person narrators to new explorations of ‘you,’ ‘we,’ and mixed forms” (13).
Recommended publications
  • Narrowing the Gap Between Imaginary and Real Artifacts: a Process for Making and Filming Diegetic Prototypes
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Narrowing the Gap Between Imaginary and Real Artifacts: A Process for Making and Filming Diegetic Prototypes Al Hussein Wanas Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Art and Design Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3142 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Al Hussein Wanas 2013 All Rights Reserved 2 Approval certificate for Al Hussein Wanas for the thesis project entitled Narrowing The Gap Between Imaginary And Real Artifacts: A Process For Making And Filming Diegetic Prototypes. Submitted to the faculty of the Master of Fine Arts in Design Studies of Virginia Commonwealth University in Qatar in partial fulfillment for the degree, Master of Fine Arts in Design Studies. Al Hussein Wanas, BFA In Graphic Design, Virginia Commonwealth University in Qatar, Doha Qatar, May 2011. Virginia Commonwealth University in Qatar, Doha Qatar, May 2013 Diane Derr ______________________ Primary Advisor, Assistant Professor Master of Fine Arts in Design Studies Patty Paine ______________________ Secondary Advisor, Reader, Assistant Professor Liberal Arts and Science Levi Hammett ______________________ Secondary
    [Show full text]
  • The Novel's Anxieties Over Existence, Purpose, and Believability
    State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College Digital Commons at Buffalo State English Theses English 8-2012 Survival of the Fictiveness: The oN vel’s Anxieties Over Existence, Purpose, and Believability Jesse Mank Buffalo State College, [email protected] Advisor Dr. Aimable Twagilimana, Professor of English First Reader Dr. Barish Ali, Assistant Professor of English Department Chair Dr. Ralph L. Wahlstrom, Associate Professor of English To learn more about the English Department and its educational programs, research, and resources, go to http://english.buffalostate.edu/. Recommended Citation Mank, Jesse, "Survival of the Fictiveness: The oN vel’s Anxieties Over Existence, Purpose, and Believability" (2012). English Theses. Paper 5. Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/english_theses Part of the Literature in English, North America Commons Survival of the Fictiveness: The Novel’s Anxieties Over Existence, Purpose, and Believability by Jesse Mank An Abstract of a Thesis in English Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2012 State University of New York College at Buffalo Department of English Mank i ABSTRACT OF THESIS Survival of the Fictiveness: The Novel’s Anxieties Over Existence, Purpose, and Believability The novel is a problematic literary genre, for few agree on precisely how or why it rose to prominence, nor have there ever been any strict structural parameters established. Terry Eagleton calls it an “anti-genre” that “cannibalizes other literary modes and mixes the bits and pieces promiscuously together” (1). And yet, perhaps because of its inability to be completely defined, the novel best represents modern thought and sensibility.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Plot and Genre in Short Fiction ASHLEY R LISTER a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Bolton Institutional Repository (UBIR) Five Plots: The Relationship Between Plot and Genre in Short Fiction ASHLEY R LISTER A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Bolton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. February 2018 Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Literature Review ...................................................................................................... 9 An Interpretation of Genre .......................................................................................................... 9 The Components of Plot ........................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 2: Methodology ............................................................................................................. 34 A Different Approach ................................................................................................................. 34 Chapter 3: The Horror Genre ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AP English Literature and Composition 2008 - 2009 Analytic Reading Round Rock High School Page 7
    SUMMER WORK DO NOT GET OVERWHELMED. Breathe. Follow instructions and you’ll be fine. I. Join the AP Lit Remind101 group: a. Text the message @aplitwshs to the number 81010. b. If you’re having trouble with 81010, try texting @aplitwshs to (669) 200-6235. II. Review the attached AP Literature Survival packet. a. Your goal is to have a general understanding of the major topics below. The packet is a collection of terms, questions, and ideas that details each of these major topics. i. diction vii. structure, plot, and conflict ii. point of view viii. tone and tone shifts iii. setting ix. writing style and changes in writing style iv. literary devices x. common archetypes and symbols v. character and character development xi. patterns vi. syntax xii. theme and universal themes b. I recommend defining any unknown words and researching any alien topics. c. If you get stuck or need help: message me through Remind101, text me, or email me with any questions regarding concepts. (Note: Youtube is also a great resource.) (Phone 404 538 4379, Email [email protected]) III. Read and annotate the following books: a. The Elements of Style by Strunk and White (free copies can be found online) i. Annotate this for grammatical rules. Guaranteed: you will find many rules of usage you didn’t know. b. Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Doestoevsky c. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley d. ANNOTATION METHOD FOR NOVELS: Using your AP Literature survival packet for help, annotate your novel using the key terms and questions. This will help you with part IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Time-Travel and Empathy: an Analysis of How Anachronous Narrative Structures Affect Character/Reader Empathy
    Department of English Time-travel and Empathy: an Analysis of how Anachronous Narrative Structures Affect Character/Reader Empathy Sophie Austin Master’s Thesis Literature Spring 2019 Supervisor: Dr. Lucy Durneen Abstract This study focuses on the relationship between the author’s narrative craft and the potential for the reader’s empathetic response. Specifically, it discusses how an anachronous narrative structure provides the author with different ways to promote empathy. The discussion of empathy is key in the discussion of narrative craft: great characters are those a reader can empathise with. But the discussion of empathy runs deeper than this, with many scholars turning to the wider effects literature can have on a reader’s moral compass (Nussbaum 1997) and even their real-world behaviour (Keen 2007). This study sets aside the question of how to produce empathy and turns instead to the author’s craft. I have assessed the author’s capability of promoting empathy by building a framework of tools for the author (dubbed The Empathy Toolbox) from several studies conducted by narratology theorists. I have then analysed this in relation to my own work and that of Audrey Niffenegger and Kurt Vonnegut with a particular focus on characterisation and how this is affected by anachrony. This study is of value to all writers of creative fiction, as anachronous timelines can be employed across a breadth of genres using plot devices like flashbacks, flash-forwards and dream sequences. Furthermore, it provides authors with tools to aid their craft and help their work resonate with any reader, not just those that might have a similar background to their protagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENTS of FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms That Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction
    Dr. Hallett ELEMENTS OF FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms that Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction” is defined as any imaginative re-creation of life in prose narrative form. All fiction is a falsehood of sorts because it relates events that never actually happened to people (characters) who never existed, at least not in the manner portrayed in the stories. However, fiction writers aim at creating “legitimate untruths,” since they seek to demonstrate meaningful insights into the human condition. Therefore, fiction is “untrue” in the absolute sense, but true in the universal sense. Critical Thinking – analysis of any work of literature – requires a thorough investigation of the “who, where, when, what, why, etc.” of the work. Narrator / Narrative Voice Guiding Question: Who is telling the story? …What is the … Narrative Point of View is the perspective from which the events in the story are observed and recounted. To determine the point of view, identify who is telling the story, that is, the viewer through whose eyes the readers see the action (the narrator). Consider these aspects: A. Pronoun p-o-v: First (I, We)/Second (You)/Third Person narrator (He, She, It, They] B. Narrator’s degree of Omniscience [Full, Limited, Partial, None]* C. Narrator’s degree of Objectivity [Complete, None, Some (Editorial?), Ironic]* D. Narrator’s “Un/Reliability” * The Third Person (therefore, apparently Objective) Totally Omniscient (fly-on-the-wall) Narrator is the classic narrative point of view through which a disembodied narrative voice (not that of a participant in the events) knows everything (omniscient) recounts the events, introduces the characters, reports dialogue and thoughts, and all details.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Second Quintet”: Miles Davis, the Jazz Avant-Garde, and Change, 1959-68
    THE “SECOND QUINTET”: MILES DAVIS, THE JAZZ AVANT-GARDE, AND CHANGE, 1959-68 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MUSIC AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Kwami Taín Coleman August 2014 © 2014 by Kwami T Coleman. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/vw492fh1838 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Karol Berger, Co-Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. MichaelE Veal, Co-Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Heather Hadlock I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Charles Kronengold Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost for Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format.
    [Show full text]
  • Perusal Book 3 Perusal Book 3
    PERUSAL BOOK 3 PERUSAL BOOK 3 INTERMEDIATE TO ADVANCED STUDIES TIM LAUTZENHEISER JOHN HIGGINS CHARLES MENGHINI PAUL LAVENDER TOM C. RHODES DON BIERSCHENK Percussion consultant and editor WILL RAPP PERUSAL BOOK FORMAT This book is designed to give you an overview of Essential Technique for Band Book 3. Throughout this book you will find every exercise and page from the book, from the conductor book as well as a mixture of various student books. A variety of instruments were chosen to offer a sampling of how each instrument is approached. Instruments are notated on each page as they change throughout the book. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS INTERACTIVE Essential Elements Conductor and Student Books come with a wealth of tools and resources online! Be sure to check out www.essentialelementsinteractive.com for more information. EEi works with these platforms: Copyright © 2004 by HAL LEONARD LLC International Copyright Secured All Rights Reserved EE BAND PERUSAL BOOK 3: CONDUCTOR 6 SEQUENCE OF Director 1 12–17 18–24 25–27 28–34 35–41 42–47 48–51 52–56 57–63 64–67 68–71 Page Student Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 3 Rhythm Rap, Rhythm Rhythm Rhythm Rhythms œ ‰œ3 œ œ ‰ Sixteenth Rap Rap Rap , Notes Rhythm‰ œ œ Rap and Rests Minor Triplets Theory 3 9 Keys 12 with Rests 8 , 8 8 Handel, Native Johann Claude History Baroque American Strauss Jr. Debussy Period Music Tempo Lento, Lento Terms div., Maestoso di Valse, Giocoso molto Mysterioso a2 Operetta Concert B Major, Concert Concert E Major, Concert Concert F Major, Special Title Chorale,b A Minor, Chorale,b C Minor, Chorale, EE Quiz Features Page Chromatic Scale EE Quiz Chromatic Scale EE Quiz Chromatic Scale Note Sequence œ# œ œ# Flute œ# & Oboe œ# œ# & Enharmonic œ# œ œ# Bassoon ? œ# œb Enharm.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Delillo and the Harbingers of Mortality
    MISCELÂNEA Revista de Pós-Graduação em Letras UNESP – Campus de Assis ISSN: 1984-2899 www.assis.unesp.br/miscelanea Miscelânea, Assis, vol.9, jan./jun.2011 DON DELILLO AND THE HARBINGERS OF MORTALITY Gustavo Vargas Cohen (Doutorando — UFRS) RESUMO ABSTRACT O objetivo do presente texto é capturar The aim of the present text is to os sinais e contingências que podem capture the signs and contingencies dificultar e impedir o progresso de um that may hamper and prevent a writer’s escritor. A relevância de Don DeLillo para progress. It acknowledges Don DeLillo’s a literatura mundial é apresentada e relevance to world literature, corroborada por uma lista comentada corroborated by an informed listing of dos prêmios recebidos pelo autor e dos the awards the author has received and temas abordados individualmente em of the themes approached in his suas obras. O texto também discute os individual novels. The text also predecessores de DeLillo, as raízes discusses DeLillo’s predecessors, the históricas de seu tipo de representação historical roots of his kind of realistic realista da sociedade contemporânea e portrayal of contemporary society and as sementes de seu estilo de escrita pós- the seeds to his post-modern writing moderno. A parte final traz um quadro style. The final part brings an outline of geral dos sintomas como evidenciados the symptomatic evidence as shaped by pelos argumentos que seus críticos the arguments that critics offer for oferecem para consideração. O texto consideration. The text concludes by conclui reconhecendo os efeitos acknowledging the side-effects of colaterais de escrever com tamanha writing with such profusion, intensity profusão, intensidade e diversidade.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS for JAZZ ENSEMBLE Offers an Exciting Way to Introduce Young Players to the World of Jazz
    A Comprehensive Method for Jazz Style and Improvisation By Mike Steinel By Mike Steinel A Comprehensive Method for Jazz Style and Improvisation From the trusted ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS family of band methods, ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS FOR JAZZ ENSEMBLE offers an exciting way to introduce young players to the world of jazz. Specifically designed to teach jazz basics to students with 1 or 2 years playing experience. #73999-DCAAGa Visit Hal Leonard Online at HL90001883 www.halleonard.com 59271EEJazz[guts]: 12/2/08 4:36 PM Page 1 DIRECTOR’S INFORMATION GUIDE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS FOR JAZZ ENSEMBLE A COMPREHENSIVE METHOD FOR JAZZ STYLE AND IMPROVISATION By MIKE STEINEL WELCOME to the exciting world of jazz! This book will help you get started by introducing the important elements of jazz style and improvisation. You’ll also learn basic jazz theory and some highlights of the history of jazz. The exercises and compositions in this book can be played by a full jazz ensemble, or individually with the CD. Listening to good jazz players is an extremely important way to learn, and playing along with the CD is an excellent way to hear how jazz is played. The full band arrangements in this book include “sample” improvised solos for study and reference. And remember…have fun playing jazz! ABOUT THE AUTHOR Mike Steinel is an internationally recognized jazz artist and educator. He has recorded with the Frank Mantooth Orchestra and the Chicago Jazz Quintet, and performed with a wide variety of jazz greats including Clark Terry, Jerry Bergonzi, Bill Evans, and Don Ellis. Since 1987, he has been a member of the jazz faculty at the University of North Texas where he teaches jazz improvisation and jazz pedagogy.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Franzen Detractor
    SEARCH Advertisements for Himself Printer friendly by James Wolcott Post date 11.27.02 | Issue date 12.02.02 E-mail this article How to Be Alone ADVERTISEMENT by Jonathan Franzen (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 278 pp., $24) Click here to purchase the book. Noel Coward had a talent to amuse. Jonathan Franzen has the knack to annoy. Is it a conscious gift? Is he aware of how grating his pleaful moans and hopeful sighs have become? (It's like a snore turned inside out.) Or is he intentionally irritating us, passive-aggressively wearing down his readers' resistance until we finally crack and agree with what he thinks and, more importantly, how he feels? How he felt in the 1990s was melancholy. The country was partying, but he was gnawing on a dry bone. He evokes his sunken condition with a litany of "d" Martin Peretz words: darkness, depression, despair ("My despair about the American Franklin Foer novel began in the winter of 1991..."). The good news delivered by How Leon Wieseltier to Be Alone for anyone who cares is that Franzen's downbeat mood has Peter Beinart more... begun to lift. No longer a miserabilist, Franzen has made a separate peace with the anachronistic calling of being a serious writer in America, a lighthouse keeper who refuses to desert his post. In the personal essays that make up his first collection (which includes a couple of straight reporting pieces to give the book some fiber content), Franzen fuses the roles of fiction writer, social commentator, and concerned citizen, qualifying earlier positions and making amends for being an impetuous hothead in his Shelleyan youth.
    [Show full text]
  • 113 Dale Peck
    A PROGRAM OF MIX – THE NEW YORK LESBIAN & GAY EXPERIMENTAL FILM FESTIVAL Interviewee: Dale Peck Interview Number: 113 Interviewer: Sarah Schulman Date of Interview: March 17, 2010 © 2013 The New York Lesbian & Gay Experimental Film Festival, Inc. ACT UP Oral History Project 1 Interview of Dale Peck March 17, 2010 SARAH SCHULMAN: The way we start is you say your name, your age, today’s date, and where we are. DALE PECK: My name is Dale Peck. I am 42 years old. Today’s date is, I believe, March 17th, 2010. And we are in my living room. SS: Yes, in the beautiful East Village. DP: Yes. SS: You and I are like the last two artists who live here. DP: Yeah, yeah – SS: And yet we’re here. DP: – I don’t know what’s left in this building anymore. SS: So where were you born? DP: I was born on Long Island, in Bay Shore. SS: And where did you grow up? DP: I moved a lot. So I was on Long Island till I was three. Then we moved upstate, and we lived there for a year. My mother died. Then we moved back to the same house on Long Island. Two more quick marriages, and when the second one ended in divorce, we then moved, first to Colorado, for a little while; and then to far-western Kansas for a couple of years, where my father met his fourth wife. And then we moved to a town in central Kansas, called Hutchinson, where we stayed, albeit with several more moves through several more school districts, until I graduated from high school.
    [Show full text]