DOCSLIB.ORG

For Sale by Informal Tender

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For Sale by Informal Tender Plan referred to For Sale By Informal Tender Residential Development Site LAND AT CAROLINA WAY (PLOT 5a) LAKESIDE, DONCASTER, DN4 5PL 2 Hectares I 4.95 Acres Closing date for tenders: 12 Noon Friday 6th December 2019 (Offers MUST be made on the Tender Form provided) (c) Crown copyright. License Number 100019782. 2009. Completed By : Map Reference: Date : Scale : (c) Copyright GeoInformation Group 1997, 2002, 2005 and 2007. laurafe AssetManagement_LM overwrite_new225/03/2019 1:10,000 LAND AT PLOT 5a, LAKESIDE, DONCASTER DN4 5PL The Opportunity Our mission is to deliver This is an outstanding opportunity to acquire a high profile residential development site in the popular Lakeside area of a high standard development Doncaster. in this very desirable location Doncaster Council is seeking a developer to deliver a high quality residential development on one of the last remaining sites within the Lakeside area with water frontage. 2 Plan referred to LAND AT PLOT 5a, LAKESIDE, DONCASTER DN4 5PL Location Doncaster benefits from excellent communication links being located immediately to the east of the A1(M) at its junction with the M18, the latter providing access to Doncaster Sheffield Airport via the Great Yorkshire Way, to the M1 at Sheffield and the national motorway network. The M18 also links with the M62, M180 and the east coast ports. The site is well located at the junction of Carolina Way and Lakeside Boulevard within the popular Lakeside area of Doncaster. Lakeside is a business, recreational and shopping destination centred around a manmade lake approximately 2 miles south east of the town centre. A number of new housing developments have recently taken place and are currently being developed around Lakeside providing a range of family homes and apartments with the Lakeside shopping village, The Dome leisure centre and the Vue Cinema complex all in close proximity. The site is easily accessible from Doncaster Town Centre and is only 2 miles from Junction 3 of M18 via the A6182 White Rose Way providing direct access onto the motorway network. 3 (c) Crown copyright. License Number 100019782. 2009. Completed By : Map Reference: Date : Scale : (c) Copyright GeoInformation Group 1997, 2002, 2005 and 2007. laurafe AssetManagement_LM overwrite_new225/03/2019 1:25,000 LAND AT PLOT 5a, LAKESIDE, DONCASTER DN4 5PL The Area 1 Lakeside Village 4 Outlet Centre 2 Keepmoat Stadium 3 Vue Cinema Complex 3 4 The Dome Leisure Centre 5 Residential Area 6 The Marina 7 New College High Speed Rail 2 5 1 6 7 4 LAND AT PLOT 5a, LAKESIDE, DONCASTER DN4 5PL Plan referred to Description The site extends to approximately 2 hectares (4.95 acres) and is relatively flat overlooking the Marina basin and consists mainly of grassland with tree lined hedgerow boundaries. (c) Crown copyright. License Number 100019782. 2009. Completed By : Map Reference: Date : Scale : 5 (c) Copyright GeoInformation Group 1997, 2002, 2005 and 2007. laurafe AssetManagement_LM overwrite_new225/03/2019 1:1,250 LAND AT PLOT 5a, LAKESIDE, DONCASTER DN4 5PL Planning The Council’s aspiration is to encourage a high quality development on this important site and applicants should be able to demonstrate how they have taken account of the need for good design and the highest architectural standards in their development proposals in order to realise this ambition. A Planning and Development Brief has been prepared providing information on access, services and other key issues of relevance to the development. The aim is to provide clear guidance to any prospective purchaser regarding the Council’s aims, aspirations and policy in relation to the site. A copy of the Development Brief is available upon request. KEY POINTS: The principle of the use for residential development is considered acceptable as evidenced by the proposed residential allocation of the site within the emerging Local plan. The site is suitable for a range of housing types including family homes, town houses and apartments complementing the existing scale of housing development, appearance and character around Lakeside. An illustrative plan with accompanying sketches is provided suggesting an appropriate scale of development and how the key design principles might be achieved utilising a mix of apartments and townhouses. The affordable housing requirement is currently 26% of all units. The Council will expect this affordable housing requirement to be met, unless it is demonstrated undeliverable through the viability testing process. Prospective purchasers are expected to make and rely upon their own enquiries of the Local Planning Authority in respect of their proposals for the site and are advised to contact Jordan Butler, Principal Planner on (01302) 734892 or email [email protected] at an early stage to discuss development options. 6 LAND AT PLOT 5a, LAKESIDE, DONCASTER DN4 5PL Highways and Transportation Services Both Carolina Way and Lakeside Boulevard It is understood that all mains services are available in the locality.. are adopted public highway. However, it will be the responsibility of the eventual purchaser to ascertain whether such services are of sufficient quality and capacity for their own Although there are no existing formed vehicular accesses into the particular requirements. All prospective purchasers are therefore advised to site it is envisaged that the principle point of access for any future make and rely upon their own enquiries of the various statutory authorities. development proposals will be from Carolina Way. For further advice on all transportation issues and technical matters concerning design and layout prospective purchasers are advised to contact: Service Charge Wayne Lake - Development Control (01302) 735172 [email protected] The sale of the land is subject to a service charge payment towards the maintenance and up keep of the Lakeside area. The one off service charge payment equates to a sum of £275,000 and is to be paid on completion of the sale. 7 LAND AT PLOT 5a, LAKESIDE, DONCASTER DN4 5PL Terms of Disposal Doncaster Council is seeking informal tenders for this site on the following principle terms: 1. The freehold interest of the site is being offered with vacant possession. 2. The proposed sale will be subject to an overage agreement and bidders are required to provide overage proposals as part of their bid submission. 3. The Purchaser will be expected to enter into a conditional contract within 3 months from notification of being the preferred bidder. 4. Upon exchange of contracts the Purchaser will be expected to pay a deposit equivalent to 10% of the purchase price. 5. Upon exchange of contracts the Purchaser will also be expected to pay the Vendor’s Surveyors costs amounting to 1.5% of the purchase price together with the Council’s reasonable Legal costs. These fees will be non-refundable. 6. The detailed planning application is to be submitted within 6 months from the selection of the Purchaser. 7. Upon the grant of a satisfactory detailed planning permission the contract will become unconditional and completion of the sale will take place within 20 days with the Purchaser paying the balance (90%) of the purchase price. 8. It is understood that an election in respect of VAT has been made and therefore VAT will be payable on the sale price. 8 LAND AT PLOT 5a, LAKESIDE, DONCASTER DN4 5PL Offer Procedure If you wish to submit an offer, please complete an Offer Form. An Offer Form and Address Label are available on request – email: [email protected] a) Offers should be submitted by 12 noon on Friday 6th December 2019 in writing using the (i) The acceptance of an offer is subject to the formal approval of Doncaster Council. Offer Form in a sealed envelope with no identifying marks other than the official Address Label (j) Acceptance of an offer does not form a legally binding contract between the parties. provided. (k) Variable or referential offers will not be considered (b) They should be delivered to Doncaster Council, Strategic Asset Management, Civic Office, Waterdale, Doncaster DN1 3BU. Offers should be posted recorded delivery, or delivered in The Council will select the Purchaser based upon development proposals, financial offer and track person. record and will contact the successful applicant following internal approval being granted. The Council reserves the right to withdraw the acceptance if Contracts have not been exchanged within (c) Offers received after this date may be disqualified. 13 weeks of such approval. (d) Please supply the name and address of your Legal advisers, together with the name of the person who will attend to this matter, with telephone numbers and e-mail address, if known. (e) The offer should be accompanied by the following information: Viewings & further enquiries Financial Offer The site can be viewed at any time from the public highway. All enquiries regarding the site should be directed to Doncaster MBC, Strategic Asset Management, Civic Office, Waterdale, Indication of initial proposals for the site, including a draft scheme layout and schedule Doncaster DN1 3BU. of accommodation. Details of how the proposals meet the Council’s aspirations to deliver a high quality development. Samantha Taylor Martin Kaye 01302 737229 01302 736485 If relevant, the tender should specifically state what assumptions have been made about any [email protected] [email protected] exceptional development costs the Purchaser has identified. Information on previous schemes completed. Proposed professional team. Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council for themselves give notice that:- Details of any overage proposals. Details of the development time frame. (i) These particulars are set out as a general outline for guidance only of prospective Details of the proposed source of development finance together with financial information to purchasers and do not constitute part of an offer or contract; demonstrate the ability of the proposed Purchaser to pay the price offered.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sector Organisation Listing
    Public Sector Organisation listing - completed energy efficiency projects using Salix financing in FY 2018/2019 Abertay University Addenbrooke's Hospital All Saints Catholic Primary School All Saints Church of England (C) Primary School All Saints Church of England Primary School Alsager School Angus Council Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Arnold Academy Arthur Terry Academy Ash Trees Academy Austhorpe Primary School Bailey's Court Primary School Barbara Priestman Academy Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Barwell Church of England Academy Beacon Primary Academy Beecroft Academy Beeston Hill St Luke’s Primary School Bemrose School Biggleswade Academy Birchfield Primary School Birmingham City Council Bishop Challoner Catholic School Blunham Parish Council Bolton-le-Sands CofE Primary School Boskenwyn Primary School Bottisham Village College Bournemouth Borough Council Bournemouth University Brampton Bierlow Parish Council Brandhall Primary School Bridgend County Borough Council Briercliffe Primary School Bristol City Council Britannia Bridge Primary School Broadlands Academy Broomhill Infants School Brunel University Buckinghamshire County Council Burnt Mill Academy Version 1 Public Sector Organisation listing - completed energy efficiency projects using Salix financing in FY 2018/2019 Burraton Community Primary School Burton End Primary School Caerphilly County Borough Council Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council Cansfield High School Cardiff Metropolitan University Carmarthenshire County Council Caroline Haslett Primary School
    [Show full text]
  • Results from the Questionnaire: Analysis of Needs and Preferred Methods of Co-Operation
    Results from the questionnaire: analysis of needs and preferred methods of co-operation Following the demand-driven approach and in order to better assess the needs of the regional and local level, a questionnaire was sent in April 2012. The main findings were: 103 replies from 26 different countries were received in response to the questionnaire. Among the respondents there were several capital cites (for instance Berlin, Budapest, Lisbon, Belgrade, Vilnius, Tirana) as well as many other big cities. The majority of the respondents were municipal authorities and in particular mayors or deputy mayors. 88,3% gave a positive answer when responding to whether they would be interested in taking part in the activities of the Alliance The following graphs present other main findings: Graph 1 - Interest of cities to be part of the Alliance Graph 2 - Thematic issues of interest 1 Graph 3 - Transversal issues of interest Graph 4 - Activities of interest 2 Answers by countries cities and regions (26 Countries replied out of 43 contacted) Cities/Regio Cities/Regions ns Not- Total Number of Country Interested in Interested in Cities/Regions the Alliance the Alliance Austria 1 1 2 Albania 6 _ 6 Belgium 1 _ 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2 _ 2 Bulgaria 6 1 7 Croatia 3 _ 3 Czech Republic 5 _ 5 Finland 1 _ 1 France 1 _ 1 Germany 2 1 3 Greece 9 _ 9 Hungary 2 _ 2 Italy 9 1 10 Lithuania 7 4 11 Portugal 2 _ 2 Romania 1 _ 1 “the former Yugoslav Republic of 4 _ 4 Macedonia” Russia 1 _ 1 Serbia 7 _ 7 Slovakia 1 _ 1 Spain 5 _ 5 Sweden 2 _ 2 Switzerland _ 1 1 The
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council Why Choose
    WHY CHOOSE US? WORKING WITH DUDLEY METROPOLITAN DUDLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL METROPOLITAN Dudley MBC turned to Verto to implement a simple easy to use system that would provide BOROUGH COUNCIL a robust fund management solution and easy access to quality management information. Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (MBC) is one of the 152 county councils and unitary authorities across England. County councils and unitary authorities are responsible for all services in their local areas. However, they work closely with partners to ensure these services are delivered in line with the needs of their local population. Dudley MBC has an annual budget of around £740 million and serves a population of nearly 313,000 across 24 wards. It is committed to building an effective and dynamic organisation, delivering services in partnership and helping communities to help themselves. Like all local authorities, Dudley MBC has a complex structure made up of the full council and its various committees, directorates and services. It has to report regularly on its progress in delivering its plans, both within the council itself, to central government and other regulatory bodies, and to its various partners. WHAT DUDLEY MBC WANTED TO ACHIEVE Prior to using Verto, Dudley MBC managed all its projects using spreadsheets and Microsoft Project. Aware that this could lead to a rather ad hoc approach, they also had a comprehensive manual to help staff work to a common project management system. However, at 90 pages it was too long for most people to read in detail. As a result, there was no consistency in how the authority was managing projects across its different departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Rates Pilot Scheme 2019/20 Application Form
    Business Rates Pilot Scheme 2019/20 Application Form This application form will be used to assess your application to pilot 75% business rates retention in 2019/20. Where relevant, further evidence to support points raised in this form may be included as an annex. Please note that authorities cannot apply to pilot 75% business rates retention as part of more than one application. Information provided in response to this application may be published or disclosed in accordance with the access to information regimes – these are primarily the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA), the EU General Data Protection Regulation, and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004). The personal data you provide as part of this application will be held on a secure government system in line with the department’s personal data charter. Contact details will only be used for contacting you about your application or to update you on our work relating to local government finance reforms. For any questions relating to the application process, please email: [email protected]. FAQs relating to applications will be published on the Government publications website at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/75-business-rates-retention-pilots-2019-to-2020- prospectus 1. Application Contact Details Please include details of the lead pilot authority and lead official responsible for responding to any departmental queries relating to the pilot application. a. Name of lead pilot authority Leeds City Council b. Name of lead official Carolyn Jolley c. Lead official job title Senior Financial Manager d. Lead official email address [email protected] e.
    [Show full text]
  • UASC Capacity Support - Proposed Distribution of £21.3M Allocation Is Based on Latest Available Home Office Management Data Capturing Numbers at September
    UASC capacity support - proposed distribution of £21.3m Allocation is based on latest available Home Office management data capturing numbers at September. The information on NTS transfers has been confirmed by the Strategic Migration Partnership leads and is accurate up to December 2017. Please see attached FAQ and methodology document for further information. Local Authority Amount Total 21,258,203.00 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham £ 141,094.00 London Borough of Barnet £ 282,189.00 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bath and North East Somerset Council £ 94,063.00 Bedford Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Bexley £ 282,189.00 Birmingham City Council £ 188,126.00 Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bournemouth Borough Council £ 141,094.00 Bracknell Forest Council £ 94,063.00 Bradford Metropolitan District Council £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Brent £ 329,219.00 Brighton and Hove City Council £ 188,126.00 Bristol City Council £ 188,126.00 London Borough of Bromley £ 141,094.00 Buckinghamshire County Council £ 188,126.00 Bury Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £ 235,157.00 London Borough of Camden £ 329,219.00 Central Bedfordshire Council £ 282,189.00 Cheshire East Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Cheshire West and Chester Council £ 94,063.00 City of London £ 94,063.00 City of Nottingham Council £ 94,063.00 Cornwall Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Coventry City
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF TYNE AND WEAR THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF GATESHEAD Boundaries with: CASTLE MORPETH and TYNEDALE in NORTHUMBERLAND DERWENTSIDE and CHESTER-LE-STREET in COUNTY DURHAM CASTLE MORPETH NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE SOUTH TYNESIDE TYNEDALE GATESHEAD DERWENTSIDE CHESTER -LE-STREET REPORT NO. 640 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO 640 SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF TYNE AND WEAR THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF GATESHEAD AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH THE DISTRICTS OF CASTLE MORPETH AND TYNEDALE IN NORTHUMBERLAND, AND WITH THE DISTRICTS OF DERWENTSIDE AND CHESTER-LE-STREET IN COUNTY DURHAM COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT INTRODUCTION 1. This is one of a series of five reports dealing with the metropolitan districts of Tyne and Wear. In each of these reports we firstly set out our analysis of those proposals put to us for radical change to the County as a whole, and then our consideration of the boundaries of the particular metropolitan district under review. 2. The five reports are as follows:- (i) Gateshead, and its boundaries with Castle Morpeth and Tynedale in Northumberland and Derwentside and Chester-le- Street in County Durham. (ii) Newcastle upon Tyne. and its boundaries with Gateshead and with Castle Morpeth in Northumberland. (iii) North Tvneside. and its boundaries with Newcastle upon Tyne and with Blyth Valley and Castle Morpeth in Northumberland. (iv) South Tyneside. and its boundaries with Gateshead, Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside and Sunderland. (v) Sunderland, and its boundaries with Gateshead, with the City of Durham, Chester-le-Street and Easington in County Durham.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Universities for Economic Development in Urban Poles
    THE ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN URBAN POLES Dr Clive Winters 1, Dr John Dodd 2, Keith Harrison 2 1. Coventry University Enterprises Ltd, The Technocentre, Puma Way, Coventry University Technology Park, Coventry CV1 2TT, United Kingdom (Email [email protected]) 2. Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council, Civic Centre, Regent Street, Gateshead NE8 1HH, UK (Email [email protected], [email protected]) Abstract Cities are widely recognised as playing a fundamental role in the promotion of the knowledge economy but most research and policy has focussed on large cities with World-class educational and research institutes and advanced clusters of economic activity. There are clear and significant gaps in the knowledge of how smaller sized cities, with different levels and types of knowledge institutions and different levels of economic activity can compete within the Knowledge Economy. Yet such cities are recognised within European Union policy as playing a vital role in the implementation of the Lisbon agenda. This paper summarises the development phase of the URBACT II Thematic Network RUnUP (The Role of Universities for Economic Development in Urban Poles) and the perspectives of the 9 partner medium-sized European Cities in the Knowledge Economy. The network has addressed in a uniquely different way the fundamental issues of how universities should engage with their local communities with a particular focus on medium-sized cities; the role of local authorities and municipalities and the importance of triple helix structures for supporting economic development and encouraging entrepreneurship. The network has provided a unique opportunity to examine the role of universities in urban poles from the perspective of Local Government, given the constitution of the 9 partner cities rather than a traditional model taking Universities as the point of reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council & Barnsley Metropolitan
    TERRALED ARIALED Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council & Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council OrangeTek - TERRALED & ARIALED November 2014 “We have developed an excellent working relationship, this has enabled us to be ahead target for our installation programme and made it possible to realise additional energy savings. I have received very positive feedback from Members of the public and our own installation operatives regarding the OrangeTek LED lanterns. Initial lighting performance surveys have shown excellent lighting levels and uniformity” Colin Knight, Rotherham MBC Highway Network Management Group Manager ARIALED RMBC & BMBC - Lighting installed by DLO (Direct Labour Organisation) TERRALED and ARIALED by OrangeTek To date: installations in excess of 4,500 ME (V) Class units and 3,000 P Class units in just over 1 year. (3 year project – 41,000 units) Project Requirements Project Developments Rotherham Council is responsible for maintaining and OrangeTek continually strives to stay ahead of the controlling 36,000 units & Barnsley Council is responsible for market by appropriately investing in Research & maintaining and controlling 33,500 street lighting installations Development and regularly implementing on the roads throughout the boroughs. Routine maintenance improvements or developing new products to meet our is carried out by both Rotherham & Barnsley Council’s Street customer needs. Lighting Services who are ultimately responsible for street So when the new ARIALED was released with its lighting on their roads. improved light distribution and reduced energy These Councils, are currently replacing a combined total of consumption, this was an choice, to make use of our approximately 8,000 Main Road Luminaires and 33,000 next generation improvements and Superior Lighting Residential Route Luminaires with LED lighting units, thus Solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gadmtools - ISO 3166-1 Alpha-3 [email protected] 2021-08-04
    GADMTools - ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 [email protected] 2021-08-04 1 ID LEVEL_0 LEVEL_1 LEVEL_2 LEVEL_3 LEVEL_4 LEVEL_5 ABW Aruba AFG Afghanistan Province District AGO Angola Province Municpality|City Council Commune AIA Anguilla ALA Åland Municipality ALB Albania County District Bashkia AND Andorra Parish ANT ARE United Arab Emirates Emirate Municipal Region Municipality ARG Argentina Province Part ARM Armenia Province ASM American Samoa District County Village ATA Antarctica ATF French Southern Territories District ATG Antigua and Barbuda Dependency AUS Australia Territory Territory AUT Austria State Statutory City Municipality AZE Azerbaijan Region District BDI Burundi Province Commune Colline Sous Colline BEL Belgium Region Capital Region Arrondissement Commune BEN Benin Department Commune BFA Burkina Faso Region Province Department BGD Bangladesh Division Distict Upazilla Union BGR Bulgaria Province Municipality BHR Bahrain Governorate BHS Bahamas District 2 BIH Bosnia and Herzegovina District -?- Commune BLM Saint-Barthélemy BLR Belarus Region District BLZ Belize District BMU Bermuda Parish BOL Bolivia Department Province Municipality BRA Brazil State Municipality District BRB Barbados Parish BRN Brunei District Mukim BTN Bhutan District Village block BVT Bouvet Island BWA Botswana District Sub-district CAF Central African Republic Prefecture Sub-prefecture CAN Canada Province Census Division Town CCK Cocos Islands CHE Switzerland Canton District Municipality CHL Chile Region Province Municipality CHN China Province Prefecture
    [Show full text]
  • Hatfield Town Council’S Code of Conduct
    DONCASTER METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL HEARINGS SUB-COMMITTEE NOTICE OF FINDING IN RELATION TO AN INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGED BREACHES OF THE HATFIELD TOWN COUNCIL’S CODE OF CONDUCT The Hearings Sub-Committee of Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, at a meeting held on Tuesday, 22nd January 2019 considered allegations made by Clare McRoy, the Clerk of Hatfield Town Council, against Councillors Jessie Credland, Michael Glynn and William Morrison of Hatfield Town Council. The Sub-Committee determined that there had been a failure by Councillors Credland, Glynn and Morrison to comply with the following Obligations of the Members’ Code of Conduct adopted by Hatfield Town Council:- Member Obligation 1 1. (He/she shall behave in such a way that a reasonable person would regard as respectful). Member Obligation 2 2. (He/she shall not act in a way which a reasonable person would regard as bullying or intimidatory). In addition, Parish Councillor William Morrison had failed to comply with the Code of Conduct of the authority concerned in relation to the following obligation of the Code:- Member Obligation 5 3. (He/she shall not disclose information which is confidential or where disclosure if prohibited by law). It was alleged that:- (i) Councillors Credland, Glynn and Morrison had handed Clare McRoy, (Clerk to Hatfield Town Council) a letter dated 11th June 2018, dismissing her from her post as Clerk. The complaint alleged that the three Councillors had no authority to issue the letter and did so without the knowledge of the rest of the Councillors or any proper processes being followed; and (ii) Councillor Morrison had passed on an email without authority or permission to another Councillor that Mrs McRoy had sent to him marked ‘confidential’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Finance Report (England) 2020/2021
    The Local Government Finance Report (England) 2020/2021 HC 68 The Local Government Finance Report (England) 2020/2021 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to paragraph 5 of Schedule 7B to the Local Government Finance Act 1988 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed on 6 February 2020 HC 68 © Crown copyright, 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Fry Building, 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF Tel: 030 3444 0000 ISBN 978-1-5286-1765-9 CCS0220023022 02/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Central and local share 6 3. Revenue Support Grant 7 4. Distribution of Revenue Support Grant 8 Part A ± Council of the Isles of Scilly 8 Part B ± Main distribution 8 5. Distribution of Baseline Funding Level 12 Part A ± Main distribution 12 Part B ± Authorities with increased Business Rates Retention 13 6. Tariff and top-up amounts 17 Part A ± Main distribution 17 Part B ± Authorities with increased Business Rates Retention 17 7.
    [Show full text]