DOCSLIB.ORG

Republic of Slovenia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republic of Slovenia Župančičeva ulica 3, p.p. 644a, 1001 Ljubljana T: +386 1 369 6300 F: +386 1 369 6659 E: [email protected] www.mf.gov.si REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA Status of List of Reservations and Notifications at the Time of Signature This document contains a provisional list of expected reservations and notifications to be made by the Republic of Slovenia pursuant to Articles 28(7) and 29(4) of the Convention. Article 2 – Interpretation of Terms Notification - Agreements Covered by the Convention Pursuant to Article 2(1)(a)(ii) of the Convention, the Republic of Slovenia wishes the following agreements to be covered by the Convention: Other Original/ Date of Date of No Title Contracting Amending Entry into Signature Jurisdiction Instrument Force 1 Convention between the Republic of Original 27-02-2008 04-05-2009 Government of the Republic of Albania Slovenia and the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Albania for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 2 Convention between the Republic of Republic of Original 11-10-2010 23-04-2013 Slovenia and the Republic of Armenia Armenia for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 3 Convention between the Republic of Republic of Original 01-10-1997 01-02-1999 Slovenia and the Republic of Austria Austria for the Avoidance of Double Taxation Amending 26-09-2006 01-08-2007 with respect to Taxes on Income and Instrument (a) on Capital Amending 28-09-2011 01-11-2012 Instrument (b) 4 Convention between the Republic of Original 09-06-2011 10-09-2012 Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan Slovenia and the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 5 Convention between the Republic of Republic of Original 06-10-2010 31-05-2011 Slovenia and the Republic of Belarus Belarus for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 6 Convention between the Republic of Kingdom of Original 22-06-1998 02-10-2002 Slovenia and the Kingdom of Belgium Belgium for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 7 Convention between the Republic of Bosnia and Original 16-05-2006 20-11-2006 Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina Herzegovina for the Avoidance of Double Taxation 2 and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 8 Convention between the Republic of Republic of Original 20-10-2003 04-05-2004 Slovenia and the Republic of Bulgaria Bulgaria for the avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 9 Convention between the Canada Original 15-09-2000 12-08-2002 Government of the Republic of Slovenia and the Government of Canada for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 10 Agreement between the Government People’s Original 13-02-1995 27-12-1995 of the Republic of Slovenia and the Republic of Government of the People’s Republic China of China for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income 11 Agreement between the Republic of Republic of Original 10-06-2005 10-11-2005 Slovenia and the Republic of Croatia Croatia for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 12 Convention between the Republic of Republic of Original 12-10-2010 14-09-2011 Slovenia and the Republic of Cyprus Cyprus for the Avoidance of double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income 13 Convention between the Republic of Czech Original 13-06-1997 28-04-1998 Slovenia and the Czech Republic for Republic the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 14 Convention between the Republic of Kingdom of Original 02-05-2001 03-06-2002 Slovenia and the Kingdom of Denmark Denmark for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 15 Convention between the Republic of Arab Republic Original 15-12-2009 N/A Slovenia and the Arab Republic of of Egypt Egypt for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income 16 Convention between the Republic of Original 14-09-2005 26-06-2006 Government of the Republic of Estonia 3 Slovenia and the Government of the Republic of Estonia for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income 17 Agreement between the Republic of Republic of Original 19-09-2003 16-06-2004 Slovenia and the Republic of Finland Finland for the avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income 18 Convention entre le Gouvernement French Original 07-04-2004 01-03-2007 de la République de Slovénie et le Republic Gouvernement de la république française, en vue d’éviter les doubles impositions en matière d’impôts sur le revenu et sur la fortune et de prévenir l’évasion et la fraude fiscales 19 Agreement between the Republic of Georgia Original 06-12-2012 25-09-2013 Slovenia and Georgia for the Avoidance of double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 20 Agreement between the Republic of Federal Original 03-05-2006 19-12-2006 Slovenia and the Federal Republic of Republic of Germany for the Avoidance of Double Germany Amending 17-05-2011 30-07-2012 Taxation with respect to Taxes on Instrument (a) Income and on Capital 21 Convention between the Republic of Hellenic Original 05-06-2001 08-12-2003 Slovenia and the Hellenic Republic for Republic the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 22 Convention between the Republic of Republic of Original 26-08-2004 23-12-2005 Slovenia and the Republic of Hungary Hungary for the Avoidance of double Taxation and the Prevention of fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 23 Convention between the Republic of Iceland Original 04-05-2011 11-09-2012 Slovenia and Iceland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income 24 Convention between the Republic of Original 13-01-2003 17-02-2005 Government of the Republic of India Slovenia and the Government of the Republic of India for the Avoidance of Amending 17-05-2016 21-12-2016 Double Taxation and the Prevention Instrument (a) of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income 25 Agreement between the Republic of Islamic Original 20-09-2011 30-04-2014 Slovenia and the Islamic Republic of Republic of Iran for the Avoidance of Double Iran 4 Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 26 Convention between the Ireland Original 12-03-2002 11-12-2002 Government of the Republic of Slovenia and the Government of Ireland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital Gains 27 Convention between the State of Israel Original 30-01-2007 27-12-2007 Government of the Republic of Slovenia and the Government of the State of Israel for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 28 Convention between the Italian Original 11-09-2001 12-01-2010 Government of the Republic of Republic Slovenia and the Government of the Italian Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital and the prevention of Fiscal Evasion 29 Convention between the Republic of Original 10-03-2016 30-12-2016 Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan Slovenia and the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and on capital 30 Convention between the Republic of Republic of Original 25-04-2005 02-03-2006 Slovenia and the Republic of Korea Korea for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income 31 Convention between the Republic of Republic of Original 28-06-2013 16-04-2014 Slovenia and the Republic of Kosovo Kosovo for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 32 Convention between the State of Original 11-01-2010 17-05-2013 Government of the Republic of Kuwait Slovenia and the Government of the State of Kuwait for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 33 Convention between the Republic of Original 17-04-2002 18-11-2002 Government of the Republic of Latvia Slovenia and the Government of the Republic of Latvia for the Avoidance 5 of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 34 Convention between the Republic of Original 23-05-2000 01-02-2002 Government of the Republic of Lithuania Slovenia and the Government of the Republic of Lithuania for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 35 Convention between the Republic of Grand Duchy Original 02-04-2001 18-12-2002 Slovenia and the Grand Duchy of of Luxembourg for the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doing Business Guide in EMEIA: Payroll Operations
    Payroll Operations in Europe, the Middle East, India and Africa — essential compliance and reporting considerations Introduction This booklet contains market-by-market newly established, stand-alone guidance1 on key HR payroll matters to operations. Where the EMEIA operation be considered as you expand your is a regional headquarters or a holding operations across EMEIA. company for foreign subsidiaries, or if In our experience, careful consideration there are existing operations in EMEIA, of these matters at the outset is the other considerations must be taken into most effective way of avoiding any account. issues and ensuring an optimal setup In all situations, we recommend that you structure of your business and seek specific professional advice from employees in new EMEIA markets. the contacts listed in each chapter. They This booklet is general in nature and not will take into consideration your specific to be relied on as professional advice. circumstances and objectives. Furthermore, the chapters focus on NB: This guide will work best with Adobe Acrobat Pro. 1 This information was compiled in July 2019. 2 Payroll Operations in Europe, the Middle East, India and Africa — essential compliance and reporting considerations EY contacts Payroll Operate Services Sheri Sullivan Michael Van Den Brand EY Global Payroll Operate Leader EY EMEIA Payroll Operate Leader T: +17168435050 T: +34 933 666 340 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Country Payroll leader Email address Armenia Kamo Karapetyan [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and Country Reports
    Flash Report 01/2017 Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and country reports EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Unit B.2 – Working Conditions Flash Report 01/2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 ISBN ABC 12345678 DOI 987654321 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Flash Report 01/2017 Country Labour Law Experts Austria Martin Risak Daniela Kroemer Belgium Wilfried Rauws Bulgaria Krassimira Sredkova Croatia Ivana Grgurev Cyprus Nicos Trimikliniotis Czech Republic Nataša Randlová Denmark Natalie Videbaek Munkholm Estonia Gaabriel Tavits Finland Matleena Engblom France Francis Kessler Germany Bernd Waas Greece Costas Papadimitriou Hungary Gyorgy Kiss Ireland Anthony Kerr Italy Edoardo Ales Latvia Kristine Dupate Lithuania Tomas Davulis Luxemburg Jean-Luc Putz Malta Lorna Mifsud Cachia Netherlands Barend Barentsen Poland Leszek Mitrus Portugal José João Abrantes Rita Canas da Silva Romania Raluca Dimitriu Slovakia Robert Schronk Slovenia Polonca Končar Spain Joaquín García-Murcia Iván Antonio Rodríguez Cardo Sweden Andreas Inghammar United Kingdom Catherine Barnard Iceland Inga Björg Hjaltadóttir Liechtenstein Wolfgang Portmann Norway Helga Aune Lill Egeland Flash Report 01/2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth As a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity*
    Chapter 8 The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity* Satoshi Koyama Introduction The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Rzeczpospolita) was one of the largest states in early modern Europe. In the second half of the sixteenth century, after the union of Lublin (1569), the Polish-Lithuanian state covered an area of 815,000 square kilometres. It attained its greatest extent (990,000 square kilometres) in the first half of the seventeenth century. On the European continent there were only two larger countries than Poland-Lithuania: the Grand Duchy of Moscow (c.5,400,000 square kilometres) and the European territories of the Ottoman Empire (840,000 square kilometres). Therefore the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was the largest country in Latin-Christian Europe in the early modern period (Wyczański 1973: 17–8). In this paper I discuss the internal diversity of the Commonwealth in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and consider how such a huge territorial complex was politically organised and integrated. * This paper is a part of the results of the research which is grant-aided by the ‘Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research’ program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science in 2005–2007. - 137 - SATOSHI KOYAMA 1. The Internal Diversity of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Poland-Lithuania before the union of Lublin was a typical example of a composite monarchy in early modern Europe. ‘Composite state’ is the term used by H. G. Koenigsberger, who argued that most states in early modern Europe had been ‘composite states, including more than one country under the sovereignty of one ruler’ (Koenigsberger, 1978: 202).
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Poland and Lithuania
    A Short History of Poland and Lithuania Chapter 1. The Origin of the Polish Nation.................................3 Chapter 2. The Piast Dynasty...................................................4 Chapter 3. Lithuania until the Union with Poland.........................7 Chapter 4. The Personal Union of Poland and Lithuania under the Jagiellon Dynasty. ..................................................8 Chapter 5. The Full Union of Poland and Lithuania. ................... 11 Chapter 6. The Decline of Poland-Lithuania.............................. 13 Chapter 7. The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania : The Napoleonic Interlude............................................................. 16 Chapter 8. Divided Poland-Lithuania in the 19th Century. .......... 18 Chapter 9. The Early 20th Century : The First World War and The Revival of Poland and Lithuania. ............................. 21 Chapter 10. Independent Poland and Lithuania between the bTwo World Wars.......................................................... 25 Chapter 11. The Second World War. ......................................... 28 Appendix. Some Population Statistics..................................... 33 Map 1: Early Times ......................................................... 35 Map 2: Poland Lithuania in the 15th Century........................ 36 Map 3: The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania ........................... 38 Map 4: Modern North-east Europe ..................................... 40 1 Foreword. Poland and Lithuania have been linked together in this history because
    [Show full text]
  • Report for Austria– Questionnaire Related the Administration Control
    ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN EUROPE – Report for Austria– Questionnaire related the administration control list and typology in the 25 Member States of the European Union Preliminary. 1. Administration jurisdictional control was one typical concern of the liberal streams in the 19th century. In Austria, “the Reichsgericht”, a precursor of the Constitutional Court, was created by the December 1867 constitution which also planned creation of a Supreme Administrative Court (hereafter “the Verwaltungsgerichtshof”). However, this project was only fulfilled in 1876. Following this, the Verwaltungsgerichtshof played a decisive role in developing the legal protection system in Austria, establishing fundamental principles for administrative procedural law. Between 1934 and 1938, the Constitutional Court and the Verwaltungsgerichtshof merged to become “the Bundesgerichtshof”. Several judges were retired for political reasons. The introductions of Chambers with extended composition and of actions for administrative failure to act were significant reforms. After 1938, “the Bundesgerichtshof” lost its authority as Constitutional Court as well as several of its administrative jurisdiction authorities. Several judges were retired for political reasons. In 1940 “the Bundesgerichtshof” became “the Verwaltungsgerichtshof in Vienna” which was an administrative authority of the Reich. In 1941, the Verwaltungsgerichtshof became the “Vienna Außensenat” of the “Reichsverwaltungsgericht” by forming an organisational association with other German administrative courts. A few weeks after the Austrian declaration of independence in 1945, Chancellor Renner commissioned Mr. Coreth to revive the Verwaltungsgerichtshof which took up its duties again on 7th December 1945. The legal text on the Verwaltungsgerichtshof was amended and reissued several times but, in substance, it is still in force today. In 1945, the Constitutional Court was re-established with the same capacities as 1933 and it began carrying out its duties again in 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Rights After EU Enlargement: a Comparison of Antigay Politics in Poland and Latvia
    Original Article Minority rights after EU enlargement: A comparison of antigay politics in Poland and Latvia Conor O’Dwyer* and Katrina Z.S. Schwartz Department of Political Science, University of Florida, 234 Anderson Hall, PO Box 117325, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7325, USA. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] *Corresponding author. Abstract This paper examines the recent backlash against gay rights in Poland and Latvia as a test case of the depth and breadth of ‘europeanization’ in the new postcommunist member-states of the European Union (EU). We argue that antigay mobilization in these countries constitutes illiberal governance (and thus a failure of europeanization) on three grounds: failure of institutional protections for sexual minorities, broad inclusion of illiberal elites in mainstream politics and virulence of antigay rhetoric by political elites in the public sphere. To explain the stalled europeanization of nondiscrimination norms regarding sexual minorities, we apply two analytical models widely used to explain successful norm adoption in other policy areas: the ‘external incentives’ and ‘social learning’ models. We find that in the case of gay rights, EU conditionality was weak, and national identity and ‘resonance’ operated against norm adoption, as did domestic institutions (namely, weakly institutionalized party systems). The EU might have overcome these obstacles through persuasion, but deliberative processes were lacking. Our analysis suggests that some of the key factors underlying both models of norm adoption operate differently in the new, postaccession context, and that social learning is likely to play a greater role in postaccession europeanization. Comparative European Politics (2010) 8, 220–243. doi:10.1057/cep.2008.31 Keywords: Latvia; Poland; sexual minorities; European Union; europeanization; illiberalism Introduction In May 2004, Poland and Latvia joined the European Union (EU), ending a long process in which the strength of their democratic institutions was carefully tested and validated by the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Relations Between Albania and France 1945- 1990
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Vol 8 No 5 S1 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) Social Sciences September 2017 Political Relations between Albania and France 1945- 1990 Arshela Arapi Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Paris, France Abstract This paper focuses on the relations between Albania and France in the period 1945-1990 in the political optics, and aims to evaluate the dynamics of this cooperation, pointing to the different intensity at different times during dictatorship, byhilosophical demagoguery of the Albanian party and the identification of collaborative priorities extended over 20 years. Albanian - French cooperation spread in all fields. Since our country was still unconfirmed as a state, it needed the experience of other countries. France was a kind of guide to our country, as it was a developed country. Albania also linked with France by some traditional and conjunctural elements. France regarded Albania as very important, and considered it as an opportunity to expand its economy and improve its situation. France needed the mineral resources of Albania. In general, our relations with France has been normal and were concretized in several areas of mutual interest, such as trade and culture. In various speeches, the Albanian leadership has expressed the desire to strengthen more these relations on the basis of the recognized principles of equality, non-interference and mutual benefit. But at certain times, there was also anxiety, and in July 1984, there was a regress of state relations. Keywords: France, collaboration, convention, strategy 1. Introduction In the framework of the complex historical evaluation of the diplomatic policy of the Albanian country, the relationships, with the European countries in general and those of the Western Europe especially, hold a great importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Taxation Treaty Between Ireland and the Republic of Slovenia
    CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND And THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND ON CAPITAL GAINS The Government of Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Slovenia, desiring to conclude a Convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and on capital gains, have agreed as follows: Article 1 PERSONAL SCOPE This Convention shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting States. Article 2 TAXES COVERED 1. This Convention shall apply to taxes on income and on capital gains imposed on behalf of a Contracting State or of its political subdivisions or local authorities, irrespective of the manner in which they are levied. 2. There shall be regarded as taxes on income and on capital gains all taxes imposed on total income or on elements of income, including taxes on gains from the alienation of movable or immovable property. 3. The existing taxes to which the Convention shall apply are: a) in the case of Slovenia: (i) the tax on profits of legal persons; and (ii) the tax on income of individuals, including wages and salaries, income from agricultural activities, income from business, capital gains and income from immovable and movable property; (hereinafter referred to as "Slovenian tax"); b) in the case of Ireland: (i) the income tax; (ii) the corporation tax; and (iii) the capital gains tax; (hereinafter referred to as “Irish tax”).
    [Show full text]
  • Albania's Journey to Self Reliance & the U.S. Albania Transparency Academy
    UNCLASSIFIED Albania’s Journey to Self Reliance & The U.S. Albania Transparency Academy Overview Since 1992, USAID has invested more than $500 million in Albania to support political pluralism; civil society; effective local governments; independent media; the rule of law; the energy and health sectors; free-market economic systems; and sustainable economic growth, including through the development of tourism, and micro-enterprise partnerships. This assistance over the past 28 years has led to significant political and economic reforms in Albania. Today, Albania is advanced in its journey to self-reliance for a middle-income country, having demonstrated its commitment and capacity to plan, finance, and implement solutions to its own development challenges. These achievements show Albania is well-positioned to take on more ownership of its development challenges. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)’s Journey to Self Reliance (J2SR) is a ​ ​ commitment to work closely with host-country partners to address their development challenges with the goal of ending the need for development assistance. As part of this effort, USAID has developed Road Maps with metrics that identify strengths and weaknesses in a country’s commitment and capacity to solve its own development challenges. Albania’s J2SR indicators show that it is one of the five most “self-reliant” countries where 1 USAID operates globally .​ Thus, USAID is forging a new development partnership between ​ USAID and the Government of Albania (GoA). USAID has been gradually shifting from supporting a multi-sector programmatic approach to a more focused approach that addresses some of Albania’s central development challenges, particularly in rule of law, economic development and energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation and Investment in Ireland 2017
    Taxation and Investment in Ireland 2017 1 Contents 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment 1.2 Currency 1.3 Banking and financing 1.4 Foreign investment 1.5 Tax incentives 1.6 Exchange controls 2.0 Setting up a business 2.1 Principal forms of business entity 2.2 Regulation of business 2.3 Accounting, filing and auditing requirements 3.0 Business taxation 3.1 Overview 3.2 Residence 3.3 Taxable income and rates 3.4 Capital gains taxation 3.5 Double taxation relief 3.6 Anti-avoidance rules 3.7 Administration 3.8 Other taxes on business 4.0 Withholding taxes 4.1 Dividends 4.2 Interest 4.3 Royalties 4.4 Branch remittance tax 4.5 Wage tax/social security contributions 5.0 Indirect taxes 5.1 Value added tax 5.2 Capital tax 5.3 Real estate tax 5.4 Transfer tax 5.5 Stamp duty 5.6 Customs and excise duties 5.7 Environmental taxes 5.8 Other taxes 6.0 Taxes on individuals 6.1 Residence 6.2 Taxable income and rates 6.3 Inheritance and gift tax 6.4 Net wealth tax 6.5 Real property tax 6.6 Social security contributions 6.7 Other taxes 6.8 Taxation of foreign employment 6.9 Other employment income reliefs 6.10 Compliance 7.0 Labor environment 7.1 Employee rights and remuneration 7.2 Wages and benefits 7.3 Termination of employment 7.4 Labor-management relations 7.5 Employment of foreigners 8.0 Deloitte International Tax Source 9.0 Contact us 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment Ireland is a parliamentary democracy with a written constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria: Vienna
    Guide to Catholic-Related Records outside the U.S. about Native Americans See User Guide for help on interpreting entries Archdiocese of Vienna new 2004 AUSTRIA, VIENNA Archdiocese of Vienna Archives AT- 2 A-1010 Wollzeile 2 Wien, Oesterreich Phone 43 1 51552 http://stephanscom.at/ Hours: Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday, 8:30-1:00, 2:00-4:00; and Friday, 8:30-12:00 Access: Some restrictions apply Copying facilities: Yes History of the Leopoldine Society 1827 Bishop Edward D. Fenwick, O.P. of Cincinnati, Ohio sent Reverend John Fréderic Résé to Europe to recruit German- speaking priests and financial assistance for the Cincinnati Diocese; Reverend Samuel Mazzuchelli, O.P. (1806-1864) was among those recruited 1829 In response, the Leopoldine Society (Leopoldinen Stetiftung) was established in Vienna with headquarters at the Augustinian monastery; it solicited German- speaking priests and financial assistance from the dioceses of the Austrian Empire for needy dioceses in the United States, some of which had American Indian missions 1830-1910 The Leopoldine Society donated about $680,500 (3,402,000 kronen) to U.S. dioceses; those with Indian missions that received notable funding included Boise, Cincinnati, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Green Bay, Lead (later renamed Rapid City), Marquette, Nesqually (later renamed Seattle), Oregon (later renamed Portland in Oregon), and Tucson Before 1850 Due to efforts by the Leopoldine Society, several priests from the Austrian Empire emigrated to the United States; those who became missionaries to American Indians include Reverend Frederic I. Baraga (first bishop of the Diocese of Marquette, Michigan), Reverend Joseph F. Buh, Reverend Ignatius Mrak (second bishop of the Diocese of Marquette, Michigan), Reverend Francis Pierz, and Reverend Otto Skolla, O.F.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation Convention with Austria Message from The
    TAXATION CONVENTION WITH AUSTRIA MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING CONVENTION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME, SIGNED AT VIENNA ON MAY 31, 1996. GENERAL EFFECTIVE DATE UNDER ARTICLE 28: 1 JANUARY 1999 TABLE OF ARTICLES Article 1----------------------------------Personal Scope Article 2----------------------------------Taxes Covered Article 3----------------------------------General Definitions Article 4----------------------------------Resident Article 5----------------------------------Permanent Establishment Article 6----------------------------------Income from Real Property Article 7----------------------------------Business Profits Article 8----------------------------------Shipping and Air Transport Article 9----------------------------------Associated Enterprises Article 10--------------------------------Dividends Article 11--------------------------------Interest Article 12--------------------------------Royalties Article 13--------------------------------Capital Gains Article 14--------------------------------Independent Personal Services Article 15--------------------------------Dependent Personal Services Article 16--------------------------------Limitation on Benefits Article 17--------------------------------Artistes and Athletes Article 18--------------------------------Pensions Article 19--------------------------------Government Service Article 20--------------------------------Students
    [Show full text]