1 Samuel 2 Samuel
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1 and 2 Samuel, by Robert Vannoy, Lecture 4
1 Dr. Robert Vannoy, Samuels, Lecture 4 © 2011, Robert Vannoy and Ted Hildebrandt “We now come to the final point in our consideration of the theme of kingship and covenant in 1 and 2 Samuel. Namely, kingship as practiced by David was an imperfect, but true representation of the ideal of the covenantal king. And as I mentioned earlier, we find David’s reign described in the book of 2 Samuel. After Saul’s death at the end of First Samuel, David was initially acclaimed as king by the tribe of Judah, over whom he reigned for a time in the southern city of Hebron (2 Samuel 2:1-7). Then, subsequently, he was accepted as king by the remaining tribes of Israel after the failure of Saul’s son, Ishbosheth, to perpetuate his father’s dynasty among the northern tribes. It’s in 2 Samuel 5 that David finally begins his reign over the entire nation. We read in verse 3 of 2 Samuel 5. “When all the elders of Israel had come to King David at Hebron, the king made a compact with them at Hebron before the Lord, and they anointed David king over Israel.” The first thing that the narrator mentions after describing the beginning of David’s reign over all Israel is his capture of the stronghold of Zion. At the time, Zion was a small but heavily fortified city inhabited by the Jebusites. It was located on the southeastern ridge of what would later become the temple mount of Jerusalem. From a political standpoint, Zion was ideally situated for a new seat of government. -
2 Samuel 13 David’S Home in Turmoil David’S Home in Turmoil 2 Samuel 13
2 Samuel 13 David’s Home In Turmoil David’s Home in Turmoil 2 Samuel 13 Lesson Outline I. David’s Home Filled With Deception: 2 Samuel 13:1-20 A. Amnon’s Desire: 2 Samuel 13:1-5 B. Amnon’s Deception: 2 Samuel 13:6-20 II. David’s Home Filled With Destruction: 2 Samuel 13:21-39 A. Absalom’s Hatred: 2 Samuel 13:21-29 B. Absalom’s Haste: 2 Samuel 13:30-39 David’s Home Filled With Deception 2 Samuel 13:1-20 Amnon’s Desire: 2 Samuel 13:1-5 Amnon’s Affection Amnon was David’s firstborn son. His mother was Ahinoam the Jezreelitess (2 Samuel 3:2). Sadly, he followed David’s sinful ways instead of his correct example. Tamar was David’s beautiful daughter. She was Absalom’s sister, so her mother was Maacah (2 Samuel 3:3). Amnon became sick due to his affection for Tamar. This was improper because it was a sin for brother and sister to be together (Leviticus 18:6-9; 20:17). Because he was unable to have access to her, Amnon became upset. Since Tamar was a virgin, a morally correct woman, she probably lived a protected life separate from society, as was the custom. 1 Amnon’s immoral love sought personal gratification instead of Tamar’s welfare. Scriptures teach that correct love is not immoral and seeks the benefit of another (1 Corinthians 13:4-5). If Amnon truly loved his sister he would have protected her. It is clear his love was dishonorable lust. -
Handout-PDF #4
Rest in Christ The Cost of Rest Lesson #4 for July 24, 2021 Scriptures: 2 Samuel 11:1-27; 12:1-23; Genesis 3:1-8; 1 John 1:9; Psalm 51:10. 1. This lesson will focus on the sin of David with Bathsheba and the consequences. Many people seem desperate to find a little peace and quiet. They are willing to pay for it too. In many big cities there are internet-free rooms, which can be rented by the hour. The rules are strict–no noise, no visitors. People are willing to pay to be able to sit quietly and just think or nap. There are sleep pods that can be rented in airports, and noise-reducing earphones are popular items. There are even canvas hoods, or collapsible privacy shields that you can buy to pull over your head and torso for a quick workplace break.—Adult Sabbath School Bible Study Guide* for Sabbath, July 17. 2. Our story begins in 2 Samuel 11:1-5. King David, who had fought many, many battles in his life, decided that time to send his general, Joab, to lead his army against the Ammonites. Meanwhile, back at home, David was resting, taking an afternoon nap, and then, walking on his roof. He looked over and saw a very beautiful woman taking a bath. 2 Samuel 11:1-5: 1The following spring, at the time of the year when kings usually go to war, David sent out Joab with his officers and the Israelite army; they defeated the Ammonites and besieged the city of Rabbah. -
1 Samuel 2:1-2 Like Mary, Hannah Magnified God After Her Son's Birth. I
1 Samuel 2:1-2 Like Mary, Hannah magnified God after her son’s birth. I. Hannah praised God for His deliverance (2:1). A. She prayed: It was a hymn of thanksgiving. B. She praised God for her deliverance. 4 lines of poetry that Mary borrowed from in her song: 1. My heart exalts in the LORD. a. Heart = throne of her soul b. Exults = to be pumped up i. Her grieving heartache of barrenness is gone. ii. It is replaced with a grateful heart of praise to God. c. In the LORD i. The LORD brought her heart to rejoice. ii. He was the object of her praise. d. Mary was also elated. i. Elizabeth told her that she was carrying the Lord. ii. She used Hannah’s words to express her own soul. iii. Lk 1:46 And Mary said: "My soul exalts the Lord. 2. My horn is exulted in the LORD. a. Horn is a symbol of strength and vitality. i. Horns were used by animals for defense and attack. ii. Some of you have deer horns that picture might. iii. In Hannah’s neck of the woods sheep and oxen horns symbolized strength. b. Hannah credits the LORD for lifting her vitality to bear a child, to give him back to God, and to give her joy. 3. My mouth speaks boldly against my enemies. a. She has much to speak freely about. b. She can speak to Peninnah (1:2) her rival/enemy (1:6), who mocked and ridiculed her weakness. 4. H’s reason for song, strength, & speech is God’s salvation. -
In This Issue Links Mincha in the Beit Midrash Parshat Tzav Shabbat
Yeshivat Netiv Aryeh Newsletter Parshat Tzav 1 of 11 In This Issue Parshat Tzav Shabbat Zachor Life Events Mar 13, 2014 Let Me T ell You A Story-The Story of Harav Ben Zion Freiman zt"l Part VII "Anything Is Fine" Thoughts On Purim by HaRav Yaakov Katz HaRav Nebenzahl on Parshat Tzav "Eraticating Dedications The Amelek Within Us" Staff Dvar Torah by Rav Eytan Coren "The Power Rav Shiloni's shiur on 11 Adar II were dedicated by Ilan of Giving on Purim" (5763-64) and Devorah Weinstein in honor of their son Aryeh's Afterthoughts: Know Your 6th birthday. Haftorah T ehillim List Rav Bina's Thursday night Ohr Hachaim Shiur and Thursday Night Snack on 12 Adar II were dedicated in memory of Rav Links Bina's mother Rachel Esther bat HaRav Yaakov a"h. yna.edu YNA Kollel.com A letter to our students from Eliezer Sheffer: Ask Rav Nebenzahl Thank you for your generosity and assistance and for the participation of the students of Yeshivat Netiv Aryeh in the candlelighting ceremony Suggestion Box in memory of Israel's fallen soldiers whose gravesite is unknown. Alumni Update Form Contact Us With Gratitude and Brachot Eliezer Sheffer RavBeinishGinsburg.com Union of Synagogues in Israel Join Our List Shabbat Davening Times at the Yeshiva "IN" Shabbat Friday Night Candlelighting 5:11 PM ~~~~ Mincha in the 5:30 PM Beit Midrash Kabbalat Shabbat on the porch overlooking the Kotel The annual alumni shabbaton in Woodmere will be March 28-29, the 27th of Adar II, Parshat Tazria Shabbat HaChodesh. -
Study Questions on the Psalms
Study Questions on the Psalms Habakkuk 3: A Model Psalm 1. Look carefully at the psalm in Habakkuk chapter 3. (a) How do v. 1 and the last sentence in v. 19 differ from the rest of the psalm? (b) What kind of information is in v. 1? (c) What kind of information is in the last sentence in v. 19? 2. Look at Isa 38:9-20. Can you find parallels to the three parts of Habakkuk 3? 3. Compare these elements with Psalm 3. (a) How do the parts of the opening of Psalm 3 align with Hab 3:1? (b) Does Psalm 3 have a final sentence comparable to the one in Hab 3:19? What happened to it? (You might be interested to learn that “Neginoth” is the same word translated “stringed instruments” in Hab 3:19.) 4. Now let’s study the relation of Habakkuk’s psalm to the rest of the book. (a) Read over chapters 1-2. i. These chapters record a conversation. Who is speaking with whom? ii. What two questions does Habakkuk ask? iii. Is he happy with the answers he gets? (b) Now analyze the body of Habakkuk 3. i. Notice how the Psalm is divided into four parts based on a) what Habakkuk is saying and b) to whom he is saying it. What are these four parts? ii. How does v. 2 reflect his attitude in the first two chapters of the book? iii. How does he reassure himself in vv. 3-16? iv. What resolution does he reach in vv. -
Different Editions of the Song of Hannah and of Its
CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE DIFFERENT EDITIONS OF THE SONG OF HANNAH AND OF ITS NARRATIVE FRAMEWORK 1. Introduction The differences between MT (with which T,1 S, and V more or less agree) and the LXX2 in the Song of Hannah are mentioned in the commentaries and in several monographic studies of that poem.3 The sources differ in many small details, as well as in major ones in vv. 1, 2, 6, 9, 10. These major discrepancies consist of differences, omissions, and additions (when using these terms, MT is taken as point of departure without taking a stand regarding the originality of the readings of that text). As far as I know, the differences between MT and the ancient versions of the Song of Hannah and its narrative framework have not been discussed in a monographic treatment,4 with the exception of Walters, “Hannah and Anna” (on the relation between the MT and LXX); nor have the differences between MT and 4QSama been discussed. When deviating from MT, this scroll often agrees with the LXX and/or LXXLuc (see Tov, “Qumran,”* and “4QSama”*). The differences between the Qumran scroll and MT have been put forward in Cross, “New Qumran 1 See D.J. Harrington, “The Apocalypse of Hannah: Targum Jonathan of 1 Samuel 2:1- 10,” in D.M. Golomb (ed.), “Working with No Data,” Semitic and Egyptian Studies Presented to Thomas O. Lambdin (Winona Lake, IN 1987) 147-152. 2 The Old Latin version is more or less identical with the LXX. See in detail P.A.H. de Boer, “Confirmatum est cor meum—Remarks on the Old Latin Text of the Song of Hannah 1 Samuel ii 1-10,” OTS 13 (1963) 173-213; idem, “Once Again the Old Latin Text of Hannah’s Song,” OTS 14 (1965) 206-213. -
Landscapes of Korean and Korean American Biblical Interpretation
BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION AMERICAN AND KOREAN LANDSCAPES OF KOREAN International Voices in Biblical Studies In this first of its kind collection of Korean and Korean American Landscapes of Korean biblical interpretation, essays by established and emerging scholars reflect a range of historical, textual, feminist, sociological, theological, and postcolonial readings. Contributors draw upon ancient contexts and Korean American and even recent events in South Korea to shed light on familiar passages such as King Manasseh read through the Sewol Ferry Tragedy, David and Bathsheba’s narrative as the backdrop to the prohibition against Biblical Interpretation adultery, rereading the virtuous women in Proverbs 31:10–31 through a Korean woman’s experience, visualizing the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) and demarcations in Galatians, and introducing the extrabiblical story of Eve and Norea, her daughter, through story (re)telling. This volume of essays introduces Korean and Korean American biblical interpretation to scholars and students interested in both traditional and contemporary contextual interpretations. Exile as Forced Migration JOHN AHN is AssociateThe Prophets Professor Speak of Hebrew on Forced Bible Migration at Howard University ThusSchool Says of Divinity.the LORD: He Essays is the on author the Former of and Latter Prophets in (2010) Honor ofand Robert coeditor R. Wilson of (2015) and (2009). Ahn Electronic open access edition (ISBN 978-0-88414-379-6) available at http://ivbs.sbl-site.org/home.aspx Edited by John Ahn LANDSCAPES OF KOREAN AND KOREAN AMERICAN BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION INTERNATIONAL VOICES IN BIBLICAL STUDIES Jione Havea Jin Young Choi Musa W. Dube David Joy Nasili Vaka’uta Gerald O. West Number 10 LANDSCAPES OF KOREAN AND KOREAN AMERICAN BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION Edited by John Ahn Atlanta Copyright © 2019 by SBL Press All rights reserved. -
Torah on Tap Amalek! 2008/03/Finding -Amalek.Html
Torah on Tap Amalek! http://rabbiseinfeld.blogspot.com/ 2008/03/finding -amalek.html Genesis 36: And Esau dwelt in the mountain-land of Seir--Esau is 8 ח ַוֵּיֶׁשבֵּ עָׂשו ְּבַהֵּר שִעיר, ֵּעָׂשו הּוא .Edom ֱאדֹום. And these are the generations of Esau the father of a 9 ט ְּוֵּאֶׁלה תְֹּּלדֹותֵּ עָׂשו, ֲאִבי ֱאדֹום, .the Edomites in the mountain-land of Seir ְּבַהר, ֵּשִעיר. These are the chiefs of the sons of Esau: the sons of 15 טו ֵּאֶׁלה, ַאלֵּּופי ְּבֵּני-ֵּעָׂשו: ְּבֵּני Eliphaz the first-born of Esau: the chief of Teman, the ֱאִלַיפז, ְּבכֹורֵּ עָׂשו--ַאלֵּּוף תיָׂמן ,chief of Omar, the chief of Zepho, the chief of Kenaz ַאלּוף אָֹׂומר, ַאלְּּוף צפֹו ַאלּוףְּקַנז. the chief of Korah, the chief of Gatam, the chief of 16 טז ַאלּוף- ַקֹּרחַאלּוף ַגְּעָׂתם, Amalek. These are the chiefs that came of Eliphaz in ַאלּוףֲ עָׂמֵּלק; ֵּאֶׁלה ַאלֵּּופי ֱאִלַיפ ז .the land of Edom. These are the sons of Adah ְּבֶׁאֶׁרֱץאדֹום, ֵּאֶׁלְּה בֵּניָׂ עָׂדה. When Esau was getting old, he called in his grandson Amalek and said: "I tried to kill Jacob but was unable. Now I am entrusting you and your descendents with the important mission of annihilating Jacob's descendents -- the Jewish people. Carry out this deed for me. Be relentless and do not show mercy." (Midrashim Da’at and Hadar, summarised from Legends of the Jews volume 6 – Louis Ginzburg p.23) Exodus 17: Then came Amalek, and fought with Israel in 8 ח ַוָׂיבֹּא, ֲעָׂמֵּלק; ַוִיָׂלֶׁחםִעם- .Rephidim ִיְּשָׂרֵּאל, ִבְּרִפִידם. ,And Moses said unto Joshua: 'Choose us out men 9 ט ַויֶֹּׁאמֶׁר מֹּשה ֶׁאל-ְּיֻׁהֹושַע ְּבַח ר- and go out, fight with Amalek; tomorrow I will stand ָׂלנּו ֲאָׂנִשים, ְּוֵּצאִ הָׂלֵּחם ַבֲעָׂמֵּלק; '.on the top of the hill with the rod of God in my hand ָׂמָׂחר, ָאנִֹּכי ִנָׂצב ַעל-רֹּאשַ הִגְּבָׂעה, ַּומֵּטה ָׂהֱאלִֹּהים, ְּבָׂיִדי. -
Tamar Times Three
TAMAR TIMES THREE WILLIAM I. ROSENBLUM Women named Tamar appear three times in the Bible. The first two are primary characters in important stories. The third appears as a mere mention in biblical history – or is she something more? Is she a poignant reminder of the second Tamar? Is she a reference to past events that would have been immediately recognized by all who had heard and remembered the oral histo- ry that must have been repeated for generations by the bards and sages who preceded the times of final codification and writing of the Israelite saga? If so, then the third Tamar was and is a reminder that female sexuality is an important actor on the biblical stage. This actor has two faces: the face of woman as heroine and the face of woman as victim. The first Tamar is surely heroine. In fact, without that Tamar biblical history might have come to a grinding halt. The tale of the first Tamar is told in Genesis 38. She was a childless widow, whose husband and his two brothers were the sons of Judah. Judah was a son of Leah and the patriarch Jacob, a half-brother of Joseph and the eponym of one of the 12 tribes of Israel. According to ancient Israelite law, a surviving son of Judah must take Tamar, his brother's widow, as his bride. The proba- ble reasons for this law of Levirate Marriage (Deut. 25:5-6) were to assure that property remained within the family of the dead husband and to offer the widow the continued protection of a husband and of the family into which she had first married. -
1 and 2 KINGS Short Version
1 and 2 KINGS Short Version INTRODUCTION years, until the time of the Babylonian exile in 586BC. Several of the southern kings attempt reform The Books of Kings are the final two books in what but ultimately their efforts are too little, too late. is called the D (Deuteronomistic) History of Israel, a section of the Old Testament that includes Joshua, Division of chapters in 1Kings Judges, 1 and 2 Samuel, and 1 and 2 Kings. They are As with other books of the Bible, writers divide the called D History because they are written from a chapters of Kings in various ways. One simple way perspective strongly influenced by the Book of to divide them is: Deuteronomy. In these books, the leaders and kings of Israel are judged on one issue: fidelity to Israel’s PART 1: A KINGDOM UNITED covenant with God. As we shall see, nearly all the kings were judged to be failures because they ignored Chapters 1-1: Reign of Solomon― a united the laws of God outlined in the Book of kingdom Deuteronomy. Chapters 12-22: Israel and Judah― a divided kingdom Historical context. Most scholars believe that the Books of Kings were written by an Israelite who had Finally, it should also be noted that 1 and 2 Kings experienced the terrible event called the Babylonian reflect a clear bias in favor of Judah, the southern Exile. 2Kings ends with the release of Judah’s last kingdom ruled by David’s successors. Not a single king from prison in Babylon. The Books of Kings king from the northern kingdom received a positive were written to help the Israelites, especially those in evaluation. -
The King As Warrior in Samuel-Kings
THE KING AS WARRIOR IN SAMUEL-KINGS by SAM MEIER The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 It is becoming increasingly complex to speak of the Deuteronomistic (Dtr) historians, the boundaries of their works, and the theological and historical issues of significance to them. Noth's assertion that the Dtr His tory was penned by a single historian using written sources is no longer widely accepted despite continued attempts to perceive a broad unity to the work. 1 The fracturing of the work's unity has multiplied the number of ancient Israelites who now bear the epithet Dtr with a distinguishing numeral (DtrL Dtr2) or letter (DtrH, DtrP, DtrN).2 Large blocks of mate i:ial within the history still lack a consensus as to origin: the narratives associated with David's rise to kingship, for example, are explained by a variety of source analyses. 3 Even the context and date of the succession history is suspect, with some even affirming that it is both post-Dtr and antimonarchic (Van Seters 1983, pp. 277-291). It is evident that considerable work remains to be done in identifying with confidence the varied trajectories of the Dtr work(s) (cf. Ackroyd, 1985, 301-305). The problem is further compounded by the numerous sources, whose content may (or may not) be related to the primary and changing interests of the Dtr historians. In a work of such broad scope encompassing diverse sociological, political and religious ideologies, identifying what is I. McKenzie (1991) presents with sensitive nuancing the most recent apologetic for Noth's basic thesis with appropriate modifications.