Saul, Doeg, Nabal and the “Son of Jesse”: Readings in 1 Samuel 16—25

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saul, Doeg, Nabal and the “Son of Jesse”: Readings in 1 Samuel 16—25 Saul, Doeg, Nabal and the “Son of Jesse”: Readings in 1 Samuel 16—25 By Joseph Lozovyy Ph.D. Thesis The University of Edinburgh 2006 TO MY PARENTS DECLARATION I declare that I have composed Saul, Doeg, Nabal and the “Son of Jesse”: Readings in 1 Samuel 16—25 and that it is my own work, that it has not been submitted, in whole or in part, for any other degree or professional qualification, and that all sources used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by complete references. Joseph Lozovyy TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations . ix Abstract . xiii Foreword . xiv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION I. Introductory Remarks . 1 II. Various Approaches to 1 Sam. 25 . 3 A. Historical Critical Approaches to 1 Sam. 25 . 3 B. Literary approaches to 1 Sam. 25 . 8 1. David as the Hero of the Story . 15 a) Positive Views . 16 b) Negative Views . 20 c) Narrative Analogy . 21 2. Abigail as the Heroine of the Story . 23 3. Nabal as the Hero of the Story . 26 III. The Stories in 1 Sam 21 and 22 . 27 A. Difficulties and Tensions in Studying 1 Sam. 21 and 22 . 27 B. Literary Approaches to 1 Sam. 21 and 22 . 31 1. Negative Views of David . 32 2. Positive and Semi-Positive Views of David . 35 IV. MT, LXX, Q and Josephus in 1 Sam. 16—25 . 40 A. Samuel Scroll in Qumran . 41 B. The Septuagint Versions of 1—2 Samuel (1—2 Reigns) . 44 C. The Text of Samuel in MT, LXX, Q and Josephus . 46 D. 1 Samuel 17—18 and its Versions . 49 V. The Need for the Present Study . 58 VI. The Approach Taken Here . 60 A. Limitations . 60 B. The Text and the Reader . 61 C. Procedures . 62 iii CHAPTER II NABAL THE CALEBITE I. Introductory Remarks . 64 II. Characterization of Nabal . 65 A. Nabal’s Name . 65 1. The Meaning of lbn and hlbn . 65 2. Other Explanations . 66 B. Nabal’s Reputation . 68 C. Nabal’s Greatness . 69 D. Nabal’s Status . 70 E. Nabal’s Origin . 72 III. Geographic Setting . 76 A. Paran or Maon? . 76 1. Argument for Maon . 77 2. Argument for Paran . 78 B. Maon: the Wilderness or the Town? . 81 IV. Narrative Analogy and 1 Sam. 25 . 83 V. Looking for the Answers . 88 A. Was Nabal a Calebite Chieftain? . 88 B. Saul’s Monument and Nabal’s Residence . 91 C. The Nature of Nabal’s Business . 93 VI. Summary . 102 iv CHAPTER III DOEG THE EDOMITE I. Introductory Remarks . 103 II. Doeg the Edomite in Biblical Tradition . 103 A. The Characterization of Doeg the Edomite . 105 1. Doeg’s Edomite Origin . 105 a) It Points to Doeg’s Race . 108 b) It Points to Doeg’s Residence . 109 c) It Points to Doeg’s Characterization . 109 2. A Question of Doeg’s Detention . 110 a) Detention for Non-Religious Reasons . 111 b) Detention for Religious Reasons . 111 1) Reception of an Oracle . 111 2) Act of Penance . 112 3) Observance of a Sabbath or a Holy Day . 112 4) King’s Business . 114 5) Professional Business . 114 c) rc[n is Employed as a Literary Device . 115 3. Doeg’s position in the Court of Saul . 117 a) Literal Sense . 119 1) Mighty Bodyguard (~ycrh ryba) . 119 2) Chief of Saul’s Shepherds (~y[rh ryba) . 121 b) Figurative Sense . 122 1) “Shepherds” as a Class of Functionaries . 122 2) A “Shepherd” as a Military Title . 123 3) A “Shepherd” as a Ruler . 123 B. Looking for the Answers . 124 1. Doeg’s Identity . 124 2. Doeg’s Testimony . 129 v a) The Extent of Doeg’s Knowledge . 129 1) What Did Doeg See happened in Nob? . 129 2) The Five Loaves of Holy Bread . 134 b) The Key Point in Doeg’s Testimony . 136 3. Ahimelech’s Defense . 141 4. Doeg and Saul . 142 III. Summary . 148 CHAPTER IV SAUL, DOEG, NABAL vs. JONATHAN AND THE “SON OF JESSE” I. Introductory Remarks . 150 II. Saul vs. David the “Son of Jesse” . 152 A. A Matter of the Heart of God’s Elect . 154 B. The Origin of God’s Elect . 162 III. Jonathan and David . 168 A. The “Love” Factor in the Jonathan/David relationship . 170 B. The Design of 1 Sam. 18:1-4 . 172 C. The Nature of the Covenant . 174 IV. Saul, Doeg and Nabal and the “Son of Jesse” . 181 A. Doeg vs. the “Son of Jesse” . 181 B. Nabal vs. the “Son of Jesse” . 189 V. Summary . 195 vi CHAPTER V THE BOOK(S) OF SAMUEL AND ITS WRITER(S) I. Introductory Remarks . 197 II. The Calebites in Biblical Tradition . 198 III. 1 Samuel 25 and its Author(s) . 202 A. The Key Points in Abigail’s Speech . 204 1. Call to Apply Judgment and Discernment . 206 2. Warning to the Enemies of God’s People . 207 3. “An Enduring House” . 208 4. “The Bundle of Living” . 209 5. Call to Memory . 210 B. Nabal and Abigail: The Characters’ Representative Nature . 211 IV. 1 Samuel 17—22 and its Writer(s) . 212 A. Sam. 17:54 and 1 Sam. 21:10[9] . 213 B. 1 Samuel 21—22 . 214 V. History and Ideology in 1 Samuel 16—25 . 215 VI. Conclusion . 231 CHAPTER VI SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS I. Looking Back . 233 II. Looking Ahead . 239 vii Appendix I: Temporary Setting . 242 Appendix II: Doeg in Rabbinic Literature . 245 Appendix III: The Phrase hwhy ynpl in the Hebrew Bible (A Word Study) 253 Appendix IV: Who Were the Biblical Amalekites? . 255 Appendix V: The Significance of the phrase “The Sword and the Spear” in 1 Samuel . 264 Appendix VI: Nabal’s Downfall . 269 Appendix VII: The Chronicler and the Post-Exilic Writers . 274 Appendix VIII: The Making of 1 Samuel . 281 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 290 viii PRINCIPAL ABBREVIATIONS ABD The Anchor Bible Dictionary, ed. D. N. Freedman et al., 6 vols. (New York: Doubleday, 1992) ASV American Standard Version (1901) BDB Brown, F., S. R. Driver, and C. A. Briggs, eds. of W. Gesenius’ Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. (Oxford University Press, 1907) BHS Elliger, K. and W. Rudolph, eds. Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (Stuttgart: Beutsche Bibelstiftung, 1977) DB A Dictionary of the Bible: Dealing with its Language, Literature, and Contents Including the Biblical Theology, ed, James Hastings, (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1898) IDB The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, ed. Buttrick G. A., (New York: Abingdon Press, 1962) ISBE The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, ed. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, rev. ed, 4 vols. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979-88) EB Encyclopedia Biblica: A Critical Dictionary of the Literary Political and Religious History, the Archaeology, Geography, and Natural History of the Bible, ed. T. K. Cheyne, (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1903) EJud Encyclopaedia Judaica, (Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House Ltd., 1971) HALOT The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, Ludwig Koehler and Walter Baumgartner, translated and edited under the supervision of M.E.J. Richardson (Leiden: Brill, 1994-99) HB The Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) HDR History of David’s Rise Josephus Ant. Josephus’ Jewish Antiquities JPS Jewish Publication Society OT (1917) KJV King James, or Authorized Version (1611) LXX The Septuagint LXXA The Codex Alexandrinus, a major uncial manuscript of the Septuagint LXXB The Codex Vaticanus, a major uncial manuscript of the Septuagint LXXL The so-called Lucianic manuscripts of the Septuagint LXX– LXX < MT (+ Q) LXX+ LXX > MT (+ Q) MS, MSS manuscript, manuscripts MT The Masoretic Text ix MT– MT < LXX + Q MT+ MT > LXX + Q NIDOTTE New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology & Exegesis, ed. Willem A. VanGemeren, 5 vols. (Carlisle: Paternoster Press, 1996) NASB The New American Standard Bible (1977) NET The NET Bible (The New English Translation) NIV New International version (1984) NKJV New King James Version (1982) NRSV The New Revised Standard Version (1989) OG The Old Greek translation Q Qumran Text RSV The Revised Standard Version (1952) Syr. The Syriac translation or Peshitta Targ. The Targum TDOT Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, ed. G. J. Botterweck, H. Ringgren, and H.-J. Fabry (1974-) TNK JPS Tanakh Version (1985) Vulg. The Vulgate (Jerome’s Latin translation) YLT Young’s Literal Translation ZPEB The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, ed. Merrill C. Tenney, 5 vols. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1975) 1QSam Samuel Manuscripts from Qumran Cave I 4QSama,b,c Samuel Manuscripts from Qumran Cave IV JOURNALS AND SERIES AASF Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ AB The Anchor Bible Series AJT Asia Journal of Theology AnB Analecta Biblica Series ArtS The Artscroll Tanach Series ATD Acta Teologica Danca Series BASOR Bulletin of American School of Oriental Research BETL Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium BG Biblische Gestalten Series Bib Biblica BI Biblical Interpretation BIS Biblical Interpretation Series, ed. R. Alan Culpepper and Rolf Rendtorff BR Bible Review BS Bibliotheca Sacra (Dallas) BTB Biblical Theology Bulletin BWANT Beitrage zur Wissenschaft vom alten und neuen Testament x BZ Biblische Zeitschrift BZAW Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft CBOT Coniectanea Biblica, Old Testament Series CBQ Catholic Biblical Quarterly CBQM Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series DJD Discoveries in the Judean Desert Series, Clarendon Press, Oxford DSB The Daily Study Bible, ed. J. C. L. Gibson EAJT East Asia Journal of Theology EBC The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: With the New International Version of the Holy Bible, ed. F. E. Gabelein, 12 vols. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979- 88) EF Erträge der Forschung Series EJ Evangelical Journal ETL Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses FOTL The Forms of the Old Testament Literature Series HAR Hebrew Annual Review HB Herdes Bibelkommentar HBT Horizons in Biblical Theology HSAT Die Heilige Schrift des Alten Testamentes, ed.
Recommended publications
  • God's Search for a Mediator the Book of Samuel
    God’s Search for a Mediator The Book of Samuel 21:1 Then David came to Nob to Ahimelech the priest; and Ahimelech came trembling to meet David and said to him, ‘Why are you alone and no one with you?’ 2 David said to Ahimelech the priest, ‘The king has commissioned me with a matter and has said to me, ‘Let no one know anything about the matter on which I am sending you and with which I have commissioned you; and I have directed the young men to a certain place.’ 3 Now therefore, what do you have on hand? Give me five loaves of bread, or whatever can be found.’ 4 The priest answered David and said, ‘There is no ordinary bread on hand, but there is consecrated bread; if only the young men have kept themselves from women.’ 5 David answered the priest and said to him, ‘Surely women have been kept from us as previously when I set out and the vessels of the young men were holy, though it was an ordinary journey; how much more then today will their vessels be holy?’ 6 So the priest gave him consecrated bread; for there was no bread there but the bread of the Presence which was removed from before the LORD, in order to put hot bread in its place when it was taken away. 7 Now one of the servants of Saul was there that day, detained before the LORD; and his name was Doeg the Edomite, the chief of Saul’s shepherds. 8 David said to Ahimelech, ‘Now is there not a spear or a sword on hand? For I brought neither my sword nor my weapons with me, because the king’s matter was urgent.’ 9 Then the priest said, ‘The sword of Goliath the Philistine, whom you killed in the valley of Elah, behold, it is wrapped in a cloth behind the ephod; if you would take it for yourself, take it.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Samuel 2:1-2 Like Mary, Hannah Magnified God After Her Son's Birth. I
    1 Samuel 2:1-2 Like Mary, Hannah magnified God after her son’s birth. I. Hannah praised God for His deliverance (2:1). A. She prayed: It was a hymn of thanksgiving. B. She praised God for her deliverance. 4 lines of poetry that Mary borrowed from in her song: 1. My heart exalts in the LORD. a. Heart = throne of her soul b. Exults = to be pumped up i. Her grieving heartache of barrenness is gone. ii. It is replaced with a grateful heart of praise to God. c. In the LORD i. The LORD brought her heart to rejoice. ii. He was the object of her praise. d. Mary was also elated. i. Elizabeth told her that she was carrying the Lord. ii. She used Hannah’s words to express her own soul. iii. Lk 1:46 And Mary said: "My soul exalts the Lord. 2. My horn is exulted in the LORD. a. Horn is a symbol of strength and vitality. i. Horns were used by animals for defense and attack. ii. Some of you have deer horns that picture might. iii. In Hannah’s neck of the woods sheep and oxen horns symbolized strength. b. Hannah credits the LORD for lifting her vitality to bear a child, to give him back to God, and to give her joy. 3. My mouth speaks boldly against my enemies. a. She has much to speak freely about. b. She can speak to Peninnah (1:2) her rival/enemy (1:6), who mocked and ridiculed her weakness. 4. H’s reason for song, strength, & speech is God’s salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue Links Mincha in the Beit Midrash Parshat Tzav Shabbat
    Yeshivat Netiv Aryeh Newsletter Parshat Tzav 1 of 11 In This Issue Parshat Tzav Shabbat Zachor Life Events Mar 13, 2014 Let Me T ell You A Story-The Story of Harav Ben Zion Freiman zt"l Part VII "Anything Is Fine" Thoughts On Purim by HaRav Yaakov Katz HaRav Nebenzahl on Parshat Tzav "Eraticating Dedications The Amelek Within Us" Staff Dvar Torah by Rav Eytan Coren "The Power Rav Shiloni's shiur on 11 Adar II were dedicated by Ilan of Giving on Purim" (5763-64) and Devorah Weinstein in honor of their son Aryeh's Afterthoughts: Know Your 6th birthday. Haftorah T ehillim List Rav Bina's Thursday night Ohr Hachaim Shiur and Thursday Night Snack on 12 Adar II were dedicated in memory of Rav Links Bina's mother Rachel Esther bat HaRav Yaakov a"h. yna.edu YNA Kollel.com A letter to our students from Eliezer Sheffer: Ask Rav Nebenzahl Thank you for your generosity and assistance and for the participation of the students of Yeshivat Netiv Aryeh in the candlelighting ceremony Suggestion Box in memory of Israel's fallen soldiers whose gravesite is unknown. Alumni Update Form Contact Us With Gratitude and Brachot Eliezer Sheffer RavBeinishGinsburg.com Union of Synagogues in Israel Join Our List Shabbat Davening Times at the Yeshiva "IN" Shabbat Friday Night Candlelighting 5:11 PM ~~~~ Mincha in the 5:30 PM Beit Midrash Kabbalat Shabbat on the porch overlooking the Kotel The annual alumni shabbaton in Woodmere will be March 28-29, the 27th of Adar II, Parshat Tazria Shabbat HaChodesh.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept of Kingship
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Jacob Douglas Feeley University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Jacob Douglas, "Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2276. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Abstract Scholars who have discussed Josephus’ political philosophy have largely focused on his concepts of aristokratia or theokratia. In general, they have ignored his concept of kingship. Those that have commented on it tend to dismiss Josephus as anti-monarchical and ascribe this to the biblical anti- monarchical tradition. To date, Josephus’ concept of kingship has not been treated as a significant component of his political philosophy. Through a close reading of Josephus’ longest text, the Jewish Antiquities, a historical work that provides extensive accounts of kings and kingship, I show that Josephus had a fully developed theory of monarchical government that drew on biblical and Greco- Roman models of kingship. Josephus held that ideal kingship was the responsible use of the personal power of one individual to advance the interests of the governed and maintain his and his subjects’ loyalty to Yahweh. The king relied primarily on a standard array of classical virtues to preserve social order in the kingdom, protect it from external threats, maintain his subjects’ quality of life, and provide them with a model for proper moral conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • A Broken Heart & Contrite Spirit Multiple Wives (Pdf)
    A Broken Heart & Contrite Spirit Shall Yah Revive ● contrite (adj.) "broken in spirit by a sense of guilt, conscience-stricken and resolved to not sin again," c. 1300, from Old French contrit (12c.) and directly from Latin contritus, literally "worn out, ground to pieces," in Late Latin "penitent," past participle of conterere "to grind," from assimilated form of com "with, together" (see con-) + terere "to rub" (from PIE root *tere- (1) "to rub, turn"). ONLINE ETYMOLOGY DICTIONARY ​ ● CONTRITE, adjective [Latin , to break or bruise; to rub or wear. See Trite.] Literally, worn or bruised. Hence, broken-hearted for sin; deeply affected with grief and sorrow for having offended God; humble; penitent; as a contrite sinner. WEBSTER 1828 ​ dâkâʼ, daw-kaw'; a primitive root ָדָּכא=ROOT HEBREW WORD FOR CONTRITE ● (compare H1794); to crumble; transitively, to bruise (literally or figuratively):—beat to pieces, break (in pieces), bruise, contrite, crush, destroy, humble, oppress, smite. The KJV translates Strong's H1792 in the following manner: break (3x), break in pieces (3x), crush (3x), bruise (2x), destroy (2x), contrite (1x), smite (1x), oppress (1x), beat to pieces (1x), humble (1x). ● The word translated as contrite in the Bible has three Hebrew words that essentially mean the same thing. First is the root word above. Below are the other two. ,dakkâʼ, dak-kaw'; from H1792; crushed (literally powder, or figuratively ַדָּכּא ● contrite):—contrite, destruction. The KJV translates Strong's H1793 in the following manner: contrite (2x), destruction (1x). dâkâh, daw-kaw'; a primitive root (compare H1790, H1792); to collapse (phys. or ָדָּכה ● mentally):—break (sore), contrite, crouch.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking the Book #12The Tabernacle
    The W.E.L.L. Stoneybrooke Christian Schools Sherry L. Worel www.sherryworel.com 2012.UTB.12 Unpacking the Book #12The Tabernacle I. An overview There are nearly 470 verses in our bible used to describe the form and furnishings of the Tabernacle and Temple. The bible gives a very specific plan for the building of the tabernacle. However, the temple is not outlined in detail. I Chron. 28:11‐19 does seem to indicate that the Lord gave David some sort of plan or model. The tabernacle was an ornate tent shrine that served the people of Israel for approximately 200 years until it was replaced by Solomon’s temple. This temple served as God’s home for approximately 400 years until the Babylonians destroyed it in 586 BC. When the Israelites returned from Babylon, Zerubbabel over saw the rebuilding of a much inferior temple in 520 BC. This building was damaged and repaired many times until Herod built his “renovation” in 19 BC. The Roman General, Titus destroyed this temple in 70AD. II. The Tabernacle (The Tent of Meeting or Place of Dwelling) A. Consider the New Testament perspective: Hebrews 9:9‐11, 10:1, Col. 2:17 and Revelation 15:5, 21:3 B. Moses was given a model of this meeting house by God Himself (Ex. 25:40) C. The craftsmen Bezalel and Oholiab built this ornate tent. See Ex. 25‐27, 35‐40 for all the details. 1. There was a linen fence that formed an outer courtyard. In that courtyard were two furnishings: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Handel's Oratorios and the Culture of Sentiment By
    Virtue Rewarded: Handel’s Oratorios and the Culture of Sentiment by Jonathan Rhodes Lee A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Music in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Davitt Moroney, Chair Professor Mary Ann Smart Professor Emeritus John H. Roberts Professor George Haggerty, UC Riverside Professor Kevis Goodman Fall 2013 Virtue Rewarded: Handel’s Oratorios and the Culture of Sentiment Copyright 2013 by Jonathan Rhodes Lee ABSTRACT Virtue Rewarded: Handel’s Oratorios and the Culture of Sentiment by Jonathan Rhodes Lee Doctor of Philosophy in Music University of California, Berkeley Professor Davitt Moroney, Chair Throughout the 1740s and early 1750s, Handel produced a dozen dramatic oratorios. These works and the people involved in their creation were part of a widespread culture of sentiment. This term encompasses the philosophers who praised an innate “moral sense,” the novelists who aimed to train morality by reducing audiences to tears, and the playwrights who sought (as Colley Cibber put it) to promote “the Interest and Honour of Virtue.” The oratorio, with its English libretti, moralizing lessons, and music that exerted profound effects on the sensibility of the British public, was the ideal vehicle for writers of sentimental persuasions. My dissertation explores how the pervasive sentimentalism in England, reaching first maturity right when Handel committed himself to the oratorio, influenced his last masterpieces as much as it did other artistic products of the mid- eighteenth century. When searching for relationships between music and sentimentalism, historians have logically started with literary influences, from direct transferences, such as operatic settings of Samuel Richardson’s Pamela, to indirect ones, such as the model that the Pamela character served for the Ninas, Cecchinas, and other garden girls of late eighteenth-century opera.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Editions of the Song of Hannah and of Its
    CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE DIFFERENT EDITIONS OF THE SONG OF HANNAH AND OF ITS NARRATIVE FRAMEWORK 1. Introduction The differences between MT (with which T,1 S, and V more or less agree) and the LXX2 in the Song of Hannah are mentioned in the commentaries and in several monographic studies of that poem.3 The sources differ in many small details, as well as in major ones in vv. 1, 2, 6, 9, 10. These major discrepancies consist of differences, omissions, and additions (when using these terms, MT is taken as point of departure without taking a stand regarding the originality of the readings of that text). As far as I know, the differences between MT and the ancient versions of the Song of Hannah and its narrative framework have not been discussed in a monographic treatment,4 with the exception of Walters, “Hannah and Anna” (on the relation between the MT and LXX); nor have the differences between MT and 4QSama been discussed. When deviating from MT, this scroll often agrees with the LXX and/or LXXLuc (see Tov, “Qumran,”* and “4QSama”*). The differences between the Qumran scroll and MT have been put forward in Cross, “New Qumran 1 See D.J. Harrington, “The Apocalypse of Hannah: Targum Jonathan of 1 Samuel 2:1- 10,” in D.M. Golomb (ed.), “Working with No Data,” Semitic and Egyptian Studies Presented to Thomas O. Lambdin (Winona Lake, IN 1987) 147-152. 2 The Old Latin version is more or less identical with the LXX. See in detail P.A.H. de Boer, “Confirmatum est cor meum—Remarks on the Old Latin Text of the Song of Hannah 1 Samuel ii 1-10,” OTS 13 (1963) 173-213; idem, “Once Again the Old Latin Text of Hannah’s Song,” OTS 14 (1965) 206-213.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Lessons from the Seemingly Insignificant #7 Doeg, the Edomite
    Significant Lessons From The Seemingly Insignificant #7 Doeg, the Edomite Ponder: Who would you place on the list of the “bottom 10” people in the Bible? 1. Cain 1st murderer 2. Ahab/Jezebel Evil rulers during Israel’s darkest period 3. Manasseh Child sacrifice 4. Jeroboam I Led the Northern Kingdom into evil and idolatry 5. Herod the Great Slaughterer of children 6. Herodias & Herod Antipas Beheaded John the Baptist 7. Judas Betrayal of Jesus Christ 8. Pontius Pilate Washed his hand of the blood of Jesus Christ 9. Saul Fierce persecutor of Christians 10. Doeg, the Edomite Wreaks havoc; epitome of evil [4 verses in the Bible] Focal Passage: I Samuel 21-22 Scene 1: Ahimelech’s Aid To David – I Sam. 21:1-10 1. David has begun his “life as a fugitive” from Saul; a period of 10 years during which he was “public enemy #1” in all of Israel. 2. David has no weapons or food as he heads into the wilderness. 3. David goes to Nob, the town of the priets and Tabernacle. 4. He meets with Ahimelech, the high priest. [also known as Ahijah; great-grandson of Eli] 5. David’s lies and deception will ultimately bring death to the innocent priests and Ahimelech. 6. Ahimelech was trembling when he met David. “Why are you alone and no one with you?” 7. David’s Deception: The king has sent me on a mission and I am not to tell anyone about the matter. He tells Ahimelech he has left his men at a certain place.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah on Tap Amalek! 2008/03/Finding -Amalek.Html
    Torah on Tap Amalek! http://rabbiseinfeld.blogspot.com/ 2008/03/finding -amalek.html Genesis 36: And Esau dwelt in the mountain-land of Seir--Esau is 8 ח ַוֵּיֶׁשבֵּ עָׂשו ְּבַהֵּר שִעיר, ֵּעָׂשו הּוא .Edom ֱאדֹום. And these are the generations of Esau the father of a 9 ט ְּוֵּאֶׁלה תְֹּּלדֹותֵּ עָׂשו, ֲאִבי ֱאדֹום, .the Edomites in the mountain-land of Seir ְּבַהר, ֵּשִעיר. These are the chiefs of the sons of Esau: the sons of 15 טו ֵּאֶׁלה, ַאלֵּּופי ְּבֵּני-ֵּעָׂשו: ְּבֵּני Eliphaz the first-born of Esau: the chief of Teman, the ֱאִלַיפז, ְּבכֹורֵּ עָׂשו--ַאלֵּּוף תיָׂמן ,chief of Omar, the chief of Zepho, the chief of Kenaz ַאלּוף אָֹׂומר, ַאלְּּוף צפֹו ַאלּוףְּקַנז. the chief of Korah, the chief of Gatam, the chief of 16 טז ַאלּוף- ַקֹּרחַאלּוף ַגְּעָׂתם, Amalek. These are the chiefs that came of Eliphaz in ַאלּוףֲ עָׂמֵּלק; ֵּאֶׁלה ַאלֵּּופי ֱאִלַיפ ז .the land of Edom. These are the sons of Adah ְּבֶׁאֶׁרֱץאדֹום, ֵּאֶׁלְּה בֵּניָׂ עָׂדה. When Esau was getting old, he called in his grandson Amalek and said: "I tried to kill Jacob but was unable. Now I am entrusting you and your descendents with the important mission of annihilating Jacob's descendents -- the Jewish people. Carry out this deed for me. Be relentless and do not show mercy." (Midrashim Da’at and Hadar, summarised from Legends of the Jews volume 6 – Louis Ginzburg p.23) Exodus 17: Then came Amalek, and fought with Israel in 8 ח ַוָׂיבֹּא, ֲעָׂמֵּלק; ַוִיָׂלֶׁחםִעם- .Rephidim ִיְּשָׂרֵּאל, ִבְּרִפִידם. ,And Moses said unto Joshua: 'Choose us out men 9 ט ַויֶֹּׁאמֶׁר מֹּשה ֶׁאל-ְּיֻׁהֹושַע ְּבַח ר- and go out, fight with Amalek; tomorrow I will stand ָׂלנּו ֲאָׂנִשים, ְּוֵּצאִ הָׂלֵּחם ַבֲעָׂמֵּלק; '.on the top of the hill with the rod of God in my hand ָׂמָׂחר, ָאנִֹּכי ִנָׂצב ַעל-רֹּאשַ הִגְּבָׂעה, ַּומֵּטה ָׂהֱאלִֹּהים, ְּבָׂיִדי.
    [Show full text]
  • The Image of King David in the Babylonian Talmud | Sefaria
    11/17/2020 The Image of King David in the Babylonian Talmud | Sefaria The Image of King David in the Babylonian Talmud Source Sheet by david silber More info ❯ שמואל ב י״א-י״ב II Samuel 11-12 (א) ַו ְי ִה ֩י ִל ְתשׁוּ ַ֨בת ַה ָשּׁ ָ֜נה ְל ֵ֣ﬠת ׀ ֵ֣צאת At the turn of the year, the season when (1) kings go out [to battle], David sent Joab ַה ַמּ ְל ֿא ִ֗כים ַו ִיּ ְשׁ ַ ֣לח ָדּ ִ֡וד ֶאת־יוֹ ָא ֩ב ְו ֶאת ֲ־ﬠ ָב ָ֨דיו with his officers and all Israel with him, ִﬠ ֜מּוֹ ְו ֶאת־ ָכּל־ ִי ְשׂ ָר ֵ֗אל ַו ַיּ ְשׁ ִ֙חת ֙וּ ֶאת־ ְבּ ֵ֣ני ַﬠ ֔מּוֹן and they devastated Ammon and besieged ַו ָיּ ֻ֖צרוּ ַﬠל ַ־ר ָ ֑בּה ְו ָדִ ֖וד י ֵ֥וֹשׁב ִבּיר ָוּשׁ ָלִֽ ם׃ (ס) (Rabbah; David remained in Jerusalem. (2 (ב) ַו ְי ִ ֣הי ׀ ְל ֵ֣ﬠת ָה ֶ֗ﬠ ֶרב ַוָ֨יּ ָקם ָדּ ִ֜וד ֵמ ַ ֤ﬠל Late one afternoon, David rose from his couch and strolled on the roof of the royal ִמ ְשׁ ָכּב ֙וֹ ַו ִיּ ְת ַה ֵלּ ֙ ַﬠל־ ַ ֣גּג ֵבּית ַ־ה ֶ֔מּ ֶל ַו ַיּ֥ ְ רא palace; and from the roof he saw a woman ִא ָ ֛שּׁה ֹר ֶ ֖ח ֶצת ֵמ ַ ֣ﬠל ַה ָ ֑גּג ְו ָ ֣ה ִא ֔ ָשּׁה טוֹ ַ ֥בת ַמ ְר ֶ ֖אה ,bathing. The woman was very beautiful ְמ ֽ ֹאד׃ (ג) ַו ִיּ ְשׁ ַ ֣לח ָדּ ִ֔וד ַו ִיּ ְד֖ ֹרשׁ ָֽל ִא ָ ֑שּׁה ַו֗יֹּא ֶמר and the king sent someone to make (3) ֲהלוֹא־זֹא ֙ת ַבּת ֶ ֣־שׁ ַבע ַבּת־ ֱא ִל ָ֔יﬠם ֵ֖א ֶשׁת ,inquiries about the woman.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Archaeology II. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Jezreel Valley I
    265 Jezreel Valley 266 the measurement of Judah (Josh 15 : 56). Ahinoam, 2. The Area by the Spring. Below the tel is an allu- one of David’s wives, originated from Jezreel (1 Sam vial covered terrace with evidence of occupation 25 : 43). The traditional identification of this town from the Neolithic (7th millennium) onwards. In with Tell Ṭarrāme has been contested. 2007 the Israel Antiquities Authority undertook a small salvage excavation on a section of the terrace, Bibliography: ■ Vos, J. C. de, Das Los Judas: über Entstehung und Ziele der Landbeschreibung in Josua 15 (VTSup 95; Leiden and exposed remains from the Intermediate Bronze 2003). [Esp. 440–45] Age. In 2012 an airborne LiDAR scan revealed archi- tectural remains and new excavations were com- 2. Place in Issachar menced in 2013 directed by Jennie Ebeling of the University of Evansville and Norma Franklin of the The Israelite town of Jezreel (MT Yizrĕ el, “El/God University of Haifa. sows”) is mentioned in 2 Kgs 9–10 (see “Jezreel [Place in Issachar]”). Bibliography: ■ Ebeling, J. et al., “Jezreel Revealed in Laser Bob Becking Scans: A Preliminary Report of the 2012 Survey Season,” NEA 75.4 (2012) 232–39. ■ Franklin, N., “Jezreel: Before and After Jezebel,” in Israel in Transition: From Late Bronze II to Iron IIA (c. 1250–850 BCE), vol. 1, The Archaeology (ed. L. L. Jezreel (Place in Issachar) Grabbe; LHBOTS 491; London 2008) 45–53. ■ Ussishkin, I. Archaeology D./J. Woodhead, “Excavations at Tel JezreeI 1990–1991: II. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Preliminary Report,” Tel Aviv 19 (1992) 3–56.
    [Show full text]