DOCSLIB.ORG

National 4/5 Geography Rural Change Summary Notes and Past

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National 4/5 Geography Rural Change Summary Notes and Past National 4/5 Geography Rural Change Summary Notes and Past Paper Questions 1 National 4/5 Geography Rural Change By the end of this unit you will: 1. Be able to explain key terms in farming 2. Be able to describe and explain the main characteristics of a rural landscape in a developed country (extensive commercial farming in East Anglia) 3. Be able to describe and explain changes that have taken place, the reasons and the impact of these, in a rural landscape in a developed country 4. Be able to describe and explain the main characteristics of a rural landscape in a developing country (intensive subsistence farming in India) 5. Be able to describe and explain changes that have taken place, the reasons and the impact of these, in a rural landscape in a developing country Introduction Types of Farming Intensive Farming Intensive farms generally take up a fairly small area of land, but aim to have a very high output, through massive inputs of capital and labour. These farms use machines and new technologies to become as efficient and cost-effective as possible. Extensive Farming Extensive farming is the direct opposite of intensive farming. The farms are large in comparison to the money injected into them or the labour used. The cattle ranches of central Australia area good example of extensive agriculture, where often only a few farm workers are responsible for thousands of acres of farmland. Subsistence Farming Subsistence farmers only produce enough to feed themselves and their family, without having any more to sell for profit. This is the most common form of farming in developing countries. Commercial Farming Commercial farming involves farming for a profit. The farmer is growing crops or rearing animals to sell for as much money as possible. These farms can be arable (just growing crops), pastoral (just rearing animals) or mixed (both arable and pastoral). Most of the farming in developed countries is commercial farming of one type or another. 2 Types of Farming in the UK The main types of farming that you would find in the UK are arable, dairying and hill farming. Many farms are actually mixing some or all of these in an attempt to make more money. Most farming in Britain tends to be intensive although some of the hill farms of Wales and Scotland could be described as extensive. All of them are commercial. Climate Soils Relief Warm summers, cold frosty winters. Arable (e.g. East Average temperatures of 18°C or more. Fertile boulder clays, which are Generally flat, so it easy for Anglia) Low rainfall, falling during the growing easy to plough. machinery to be used on it. season mainly. Warm summers and mild winters mean that Gently sloping, the green rolling Dairying (e.g. Fertile enough for good pasture pasture is available all year long. High hills of the UK. Cattle cannot cope Devon) growth, but not for arable crops. rainfall also encourages fast grass growth. with land that is too steep. Cool summers, cold winters and plenty of Thin, poor soils that can be Hilly, steep land that would not be Hill Farming rainfall all contribute to these areas being easily eroded and would not be suitable for machinery or cattle. (sheep) (e.g. unsuitable for arable farming but good for good enough for other forms of Sheep can cope with the slopes Wales) grass growth. farming. though. Market Soil is brought in to provide the Temperature and water is usually controlled The greenhouses themselves need Gardening* (e.g. best nutrients for the crops. carefully by being in huge greenhouses. flat land on which to be built. East Anglia) Fertilisers are used extensively. Question 1 Use the 2012 General map to answer this question. Find Kincardine Farm at grid reference 8721. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this site for a farm? 4 marks 3 Question 2 Use the 2010 General map to answer this question. “Brow Head Farm in grid square 3604 is likely to be a mixed farm.” Do you agree fully with this statement? Give reasons for your answer. 3 marks Case Study: Commercial Farming in East Anglia East Anglia includes the counties of Norfolk, Cambridgeshire, Suffolk and the northern part of Essex. It is one of the most important arable farming regions in the UK mostly because of its physical advantages Arable farming in East Anglia is highly mechanised using combine harvesters and specialised machinery. It is also commercial (mostly the crops are cash crops sold for profits to the local mills who use it for food production for humans and animal feed). Sugar beet is produced in the UK and is sent to UK refineries such as silver spoon. Physical Factors There are a number of physical factors that makes arable farming in this area Relief: the land is very flat and is mostly 100m above sea level this makes it easy to use machinery and roads and railways have easily been constructed. Soils: mostly fertile boulder clays that were laid down during the last ice age are good for growing cereals, sugar beet and potatoes. Loam soils are good for growing vegetables, fruit and cereals and retain the plant foods and moisture. Climate: Rainfall is mostly in the region of 500-700mm per year. There are long warm summers with average temperatures of 17 degrees and long hours of sunshine in the summer which allow sufficient crop growth and the ability to ripen cereal crops. Human Factors Location: it is situated in the east of England to the North of London which means that it is close to a good market for the produce. There is a good motorway network to the most densely populated regions of the UK and also a good east coast railway line which means rapid transport of produce (this is important with perishable food stuff) Politics: Since joining the EU many of the farmers in East Anglia have benefited from the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) as they have received subsidies for growing certain types of cereal crops such as wheat, oilseed rape and linseed. 4 Changes in UK Farming The Common Agricultural Policy: This was a policy brought in by the EU in 1962 with a number of aims: • It aimed to increase agricultural production in member countries. • It aimed to improve the standard of living experienced by farmers. • It aimed to maintain prices and supplies of food at a reasonable cost to the consumers. • Some of the methods that it used included subsidies and minimum pricing. Farmers were encouraged to produce as much as they could, and the EU guaranteed that it would buy it all. This led to huge surpluses in butter, milk, cereals and even wine. The CAP led to the following changes: 1. Improved Technology Machinery has taken over form manual labour on most farms. Although costly to buy, machines like tractors and combine harvesters save time and money in the long run. 2. Increased use of Chemicals Farmers have become more reliant on the use of chemical fertiliser and pesticides to improve the quality and quantity of their farm produce. 3. Increased Field Size The steady increase in the use and size of machines has brought with it a need for bigger fields so the machines can be used more efficiently. 4. Changes in land use Farmers now use their land in different ways. For example, the EU has encouraged farmers to grow crops such as oilseed rape in place of barley or oats. Environmental and Social Impacts of the CAP Loss of hedgerows and therefore a reduction in biodiversity Pollution from pesticides and fertilisers Soil erosion Increased mechanisation led to rural unemployment o People moved away from the area - rural depopulation o Local services like schools had to close Because of these problems the CAP was reformed in 1992 to incorporate the following changes. Quotas: In 1992 the Common Agricultural Policy was reformed and one of the main things that was brought in was quotas. These set a limit on how much one farmer could produce of a single product. Set aside land: To reduce overproduction, farmers are now offered grants to not grow crops on up to 20% of their land. Diversification: Due to the reform of the CAP, farmers have seen a rapid decline in their income. Many have had to diversify and seek income from other sources. Some have moved into the leisure industry and provide accommodation and facilities for visitors. 5 Recent issues in farming: Animal welfare: to increase yields, a ‘factory’ farming approach has been adopted by many pastoral farmers. This has led to controversy over animal welfare. Organic farming: as the public has become more aware of the use of chemicals in modern farming techniques, there has been an increased demand for more organic produce. Genetically modified crops: although not currently legal in the UK, many countries around the world now use GM crops to increase yield. This has led to a number of social and environmental problems. Question 3 Look at the diagram above. “Since 1945, 25% of UK hedgerows have been removed from farmland.” Describe the advantages and disadvantages of this change. 4 marks Question 4 Look at the diagrams on the next page. “The changes in farming since 1950 have brought more benefits than problems.” Do you agree fully with this statement? Give reasons for your answer. 5 marks 6 Question 5 Read the information to the right which highlights recent changes in farming. The sources of this farmer’s income have changed since 1980. Give reasons for these changes. 6 marks 7 Question 6 The sources of this farmer’s income have changed since 1980.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Animal Nutrition
    GCSE Agriculture and Land Use Animal Nutrition Food production and Processing For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2015 Food production and Processing Key Terms Learning Outcomes Intensive farming Extensive farming • Explain the differences between intensive and Stocking rates extensive farming. Organic methods • Assess the advantages and disadvantages of intensive and extensive farming systems, Information including organic methods The terms intensive and extensive farming refer to the systems by which animals and crops are grown and Monogastric Digestive Tract prepared for sale. Intensive farming is often called ‘factory farming’. Intensive methods are used to maximise yields and production of beef, dairy produce, poultry and cereals. Animals are kept in specialised buildings and can remain indoors for their entire lifetime. This permits precise control of their diet, breeding , behaviour and disease management. Examples of such systems include ‘barley beef’ cattle units, ‘battery’ cage egg production, farrowing crates in sow breeding units, hydroponic tomato production in controlled atmosphere greenhouses. The animals and crops are often iStockphoto / Thinkstock.com fertilised, fed, watered, cleaned and disease controlled by Extensive beef cattle system based on pasture automatic and semi automatic systems such as liquid feed lines, programmed meal hoppers, milk bacterial count, ad lib water drinkers and irrigation/misting units. iStockphoto / Thinkstock.com Extensive farming systems are typically managed outdoors, for example with free-range egg production. Animals are free to graze outdoors and are able to move around at will. Extensive systems often occur in upland farms with much lower farm stocking rates per hectare. Sheep and beef farms will have the animals grazing outdoors on pasture and only brought indoors and fed meals during lambing season and calving season or during the part of winter when outdoor conditions are too harsh.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Milk Production in Different Dairy Cattle Systems and Valorisation of Environmental Chain on the Basis of Added Value
    Sustainable milk production in different dairy cattle systems and valorisation of environmental chain on the basis of added value Cassandro, M. Poljoprivreda/Agriculture ISSN: 1848-8080 (Online) ISSN: 1330-7142 (Print) http://dx.doi.org/10.18047/poljo.21.1.sup.4 Poljoprivredni fakultet u Osijeku, Poljoprivredni institut Osijek Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek, Agricultural Institute Osijek ISSN 1330-7142 UDK: 637.1:574.2 DOI: 10.18047/poljo.21.1.sup.4 SUSTAINABLE MILK PRODUCTION IN DIFFERENT DAIRY CATTLE SYSTEMS AND VALORISATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHAIN ON THE BASIS OF ADDED VALUE Cassandro, M. Scientific review SUMMARY Aim of this review is to estimate milk yield and predicted methane emissions added values in local and cosmopolitan cow breeds reared in Italian circumstances. Nowadays it is well known that over the next 50 years, the world’s farmers will be asked to produce more food than has been produced in the past thousand years, and in this concern it will be in environmentally sustainable way. The review will higlight the differences between intensive and extensive agricultural systems and this will be discussed and evaluated in dairy cattle production system context. In conclusion, animal genetic resources need to be evaluated not only per unit of output but for other direct and indirect output units related to social and human returns supporting different animal production systems, intensive or extensive ones. The intensive and extensive farming systems are not replaceable to each other, but they should be combined in order to respond to different social and envi- ronmental needs, so, to define the best sustainable production system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Crisis of Scottish Agriculture
    Scottish Government Yearbook 1985 THE REAL CRISIS OF SCOTTISH AGRICULTURE DUNCAN CAMPBELL DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH Scottish and British agriculture has over the past fifty years undergone a transformation so profound that it is barely recognisable from the past. State support, technological innovation, new practices, new products have all transformed the agrarian economy and society of Scotland, and, in many places, the face of the land itself. This article attempts to identify and evaluate the most important economic and political developments bearing upon Scottish agriculture in the Seventies and Eighties. We start, however, with a brief history of agriculture support policies in Britain. The "Great Depression" to 1939 British agriculture reached its zenith of prosperity in the 1860s. Around 1875 it entered a period of sustained depression-of falling product and land prices, lower rents and untenanted farms- which was to continue for almost forty years, ending only with the outbreak of world war. It was in this period that farming finally ceased to be Britain's major industry, unable to compete with imports of cheap grain and meat from Latin America, Australia, New Zealand and the American prairies. The effects of what became known as the "Great Depression" were most marked in the wheat growing areas of England. Scottish farming, being more dependent on stock activities and with only a small-scale involvement in wheat production, survived the shock of the depression better. If Symon is to be believed this was due also in no small measure to the moral sturdiness and resourcefulness of the Scottish farmer, who countered adversity by, " ..
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities∗
    Ind. Jn. of Agri.Econ. Vol.66, No.1, Jan.-March 2011 Hill Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities∗ Tej Partap† I PREFACE The Farmers Commission, “Serving farmers and saving farming” points to rising acute agricultural distress in the rainfed areas of the country, which also includes hilly areas. It lists five basic cause factors that are central to the crisis; unfinished land reforms, water scarcity, technology fatigue-access-adequacy, institutional support and opportunities for marketing. While working for the National Commission on Farmers as a hill agriculture expert, the contributions on the hill agriculture perspective, gathered knowledge and information about the Himalayan farmers’ state of affairs, of global experiences etc., made by me in compiling the hill farmers section of the main report of the commission also form the basis of this paper. The focus of this paper is on highlighting the challenges facing hill farmers and how they can be addressed. The paper first dwells on the scale and dimensions of the problems of hill farmers including the two most significant common concerns, increasing crop land scarcity and water scarcity to maintain agriculture on marginal lands. It explains various dimensions of the new thinking on marginal lands and implications. The next section, describes how similar problems were addressed by other nations successfully. To highlight the point that technological options are and have been available, the report cites examples of right technological hits of the Himalayan region. The last section analyses the opportunities to find solutions to the hill farmers’ distress. Much of the farming development efforts made in the hills in the past were based on the poor understanding of the hill/mountain conditions, resources, environment and the socio-cultural setting of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming in the Uplands
    House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Farming in the Uplands Third Report of Session 2010–11 Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/efracom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 9 February 2011 HC 556 Published on 16 February 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and its associated bodies. Current membership Miss Anne McIntosh (Conservative, Thirsk and Malton) (Chair) Tom Blenkinsop (Labour, Middlesborough South and East Cleveland) Thomas Docherty (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Richard Drax, (Conservative, South Dorset) Bill Esterson (Labour, Sefton Central) George Eustice (Conservative, Camborne and Redruth) Barry Gardiner (Labour, Brent North) Mrs Mary Glindon (Labour, North Tyneside) Neil Parish (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Dan Rogerson (Liberal Democrat, North Cornwall) Amber Rudd (Conservative, Hastings and Rye) Nigel Adams (Conservative, Selby and Ainsty) and Mr David Anderson (Labour, Blaydon) were members of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Way of Farming
    Soil and Health Library This document is a reproduction of the book or other copyrighted material you requested. It was prepared on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 for the exclusive use of Niklas Wagner, whose email address is [email protected] This reproduction was made by the Soil and Health Library only for the purpose of research and study. Any further distribution or reproduction of this copy in any form whatsoever constitutes a violation of copyrights. The Natural Way of Farming The Theory and Practice of Green Philosophy By Masanobu Fukuoka Translated by Frederic P. Metreaud Japan Publications, Inc. ©1985 by Masanobu Fukuoka Translated by Frederic P. Metreaud All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form without the written permission of the publisher. Published by JAPAN PUBLICATIONS, INC., Tokyo and New York Distributors: UNITED STATES: Kodansha International/US A, Ltd., through Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 10 East 53rdStreet, New York, New York 10022. SOUTH AMERICA: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., International Department. CANADA: Fitzhenry & Whiteside Ltd., 195 Allstate Parkway, Markham, Ontario, L3R 4T8. MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA: HARLA S. A. de C. V., Apartado 30-546, Mexico 4, D. F. BRITISH ISLES: International Book Distributors Ltd., 66 Wood Lane End, Hemel Hempstead, Herts HP2 4RG. EUROPEAN CONTINENT : Fleetbooks–Feffer and Simons (Nederland) B. V., 61 Strijkviertel, 3454 PK de Meern, The Netherlands. AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: Bookwise International, 1 Jeanes Street, Beverley, South Australia 5007. THE FAR EAST AND JAPAN: Japan Publications Trading Co., Ltd., 1-2-1, Sarugaku-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    PHN Technical Kote 85-19a Public Disclosure Authorized POPULATION GROWTH AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA by Teresa J. Ho Public Disclosure Authorized November 1985 Population, Health and Nutrition Department World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank does not accept responsibility for the views expressed herein which are those of the author(s) and should not be attributed to the World Bank or to its affiliated organizations. Tne findings, interpretations, and conclusions are the results of research supported by the Bank; they do not necessarily represent official policy of the 3ank. The designations employed, the presentation of material, and any maps used in this document are solely for the convenience of the reader and do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsover on the part of the World Bank or its affiliates concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city area, or of its authorities, or concerning the Public Disclosure Authorized delimitations of its boundaries, or national afLiliation. PHN Technical Note 85-19a POPULATION GROWTH AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA A B S T R A C T This paper considers the consequences of rapid population growth on labor productivity in agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Observers have often pointed to the presence of large untapped land resources in the region to deny the presence of a population problem; in addition, a recent Food and Agriculture Organization study on potential population supporting capacities estimated that sub-Saharan Africa can support a population more than double its present size even with the most rudimentary of inputs and technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroforestry Systems As a Technique for Sustainable Land Management
    Agroforestry systems as a technique for sustainable land management AECID Unicopia ediciones ISBN: 978-84-96351-59-2 Depósito Legal: LU-168-2009 Agroforestry Systems as a Technique for Sustainable Territorial Management Main Editors: María Rosa Mosquera-Losada Departamento de Producción Vegetal Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Campus de Lugo Juan Luis Fernández-Lorenzo Departamento de Producción Vegetal Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Campus de Lugo Antonio Rigueiro-Rodríguez* Coordinator Departamento de Producción Vegetal Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Campus de Lugo Associate Editors for Andalusia block: Ana Belén Robles Cruz Pastos y Sistemas Silvopastorales Mediterráneos Estación Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC) CIFA-IFAPA José Luis González-Rebollar Pastos y Sistemas Silvopastorales Mediterráneos Estación Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC) CIFA-IFAPA Associate Editors for Extremadura block: María Lourdes López-Díaz EUIT Forestal Centro Universitario de Plasencia Universidad de Extremadura Gerardo Moreno Marcos EUIT Forestal Centro Universitario de Plasencia Universidad de Extremadura Associate Editors for Galicia block: José Javier Santiago-Freijanes Departamento de Producción Vegetal Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Campus de Lugo Esther Fernández-Núñez Departamento de Producción Vegetal Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Campus de Lugo Associate Editors for MAGREB
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Farming As a Supplemental Food Source Bessie Didomenica Walden University
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2015 Food Policy: Urban Farming as a Supplemental Food Source Bessie DiDomenica Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Public Health Education and Promotion Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Bessie DiDomenica has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Mark Gordon, Committee Chairperson, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. Anthony Leisner, Committee Member, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. Linda Day, University Reviewer, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2015 Abstract Food Policy: Urban Farming as a Supplemental Food Source by Bessie DiDomenica Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Policy and Administration Walden University May 2015 Abstract The distance between farms and cities and the limited access that some residents have to fresh foods can be detrimental to a city’s capacity to feed people over time. This study addressed the under-studied topic of urban farming as a secondary food source, specifically by exploring the opportunities and limitations of urban farming in a large Northeastern city.
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Farming – an Opinion on the Future
    1 Hill farming – An opinion on the future G.W.SHEATH Agricultural Systems Consultant, Hamilton. Introduction very much ignored in today’s world, both from a This paper is not a formal review of hill farming political and service perspective. literature. Rather, it is my view on the critical challenges and changes that we need to deal with if mixed livestock Relevance of Hill Land farming on hill lands is to be successful over the next 20 As we move into the 2010s, why care about hill years. It is my hope that industry leaders, policy makers farming? Some very interesting statistics have been and agribusiness managers will give consideration to recently produced by Rob Davison, Beef+Lamb New these views. Zealand. Some people say that it is not smart to look into the 1990-91 2010-11 rear-vision mirror, but I do not agree. Having a better Nos. Ha Nos. Ha understanding of the consequences of past events can help guide future decisions and changes. During the 40 Hill Farms 7,500 6.8m 6,245 6.0m years that I have worked with hill farming communities Finishing/ 12,100 3.3m 6,365 2.3m there have been several distinct phases of activity and Breeding Farms mood: It is estimated that currently half of our mixed livestock 1970s: Land development and increased livestock farming businesses are located on hill land; and from numbers, the 6.0 m ha involved, approximately 65% of lamb and 1980s: Despair and searching for new options, prime beef cattle are supplied from hill farms as store or 1990s: Intensification of mixed livestock systems finished animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Land-Use Diversity and Forest Regeneration Potential in Human
    Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 230 (2016) 210–220 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment journa l homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agee Agricultural land-use diversity and forest regeneration potential in human- modified tropical landscapes Isela Zermeño-Hernández*, Aline Pingarroni, Miguel Martínez-Ramos Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro No. 8701, Ex- Hacienda de San José de la Huerta. C.P. 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: fi Received 3 August 2015 A major challenge in tropical human-modi ed landscapes (HMLs) is meeting the ever-growing demand Received in revised form 29 May 2016 for agricultural products while conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services provided by forest Accepted 5 June 2016 ecosystems. Within this challenge, a major issue is the understanding of the forest potential to naturally Available online xxx regenerate in abandoned agricultural fields. To assess such potential, it is necessary to know the diversity of agricultural land uses in the landscape, quantify the ecological disturbance inflicted by such uses, and Keywords: evaluate forest regeneration as a function of disturbance both at the field and landscape levels. Our Agroforestry systems previous work has shown that in abandoned fields the abundance and species diversity of regenerating Biodiversity conservation rain forest trees decline as disturbance level increases. Here we aimed to achieve the following: 1) to Ecological disturbance regimes quantify the diversity of agricultural land uses in HMLs; 2) to assess ecological disturbance regimes Extensive farming caused by different agricultural land uses, at the field and landscape scales; and 3) to identify groups of Monoculture practices agricultural land uses with contrasting effects for forest regeneration at the landscape level.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW MASTER FACTSHEET 1-04.Qxd
    Farming on Dartmoor Dartmoor Factsheet Prehistoric times to the present day For over 5,000 years farming has been the Reaves are low, stony, earth covered banks main land use on Dartmoor. Working and which were built around 1200 BC to divide re-working the land, farmers have created all but the highest parts of Dartmoor, and maintained a large part of the Dartmoor first into territories (a little like our present landscape. Today over 90% of the land day parishes), and within those into long, within the National Park boundary is used narrow, parallel fields. Their main function for farming. Much of this area is both open was probably to control the movement of and enclosed moorland where livestock is stock, but there is some evidence that grazed, and the remainder is made up of prehistoric people were also growing fringe enclosed farmland which mainly cereals here. A climatic deterioration and the comprises improved grassland. In addition, spread of peat during the first millennium woods, shelterbelts, wetlands, rough pasture, BC (1000 - 1 BC), both resulting in poorer traditional buildings and archaeological grazing vegetation, contributed to the features all contribute to the character abandonment of the higher part of of the farmed land. Dartmoor during the later prehistoric period. The well-being of the hill farming community The Medieval Period is fundamental to the future of Dartmoor as a National Park in landscape, cultural, ecological Improvement of the climate in medieval times and enjoyment terms and for the viability and allowed the re-occupation of the moorland sustainability of the local rural community.
    [Show full text]