DOCSLIB.ORG

Farming in the Uplands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Farming in the Uplands House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Farming in the Uplands Third Report of Session 2010–11 Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/efracom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 9 February 2011 HC 556 Published on 16 February 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and its associated bodies. Current membership Miss Anne McIntosh (Conservative, Thirsk and Malton) (Chair) Tom Blenkinsop (Labour, Middlesborough South and East Cleveland) Thomas Docherty (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Richard Drax, (Conservative, South Dorset) Bill Esterson (Labour, Sefton Central) George Eustice (Conservative, Camborne and Redruth) Barry Gardiner (Labour, Brent North) Mrs Mary Glindon (Labour, North Tyneside) Neil Parish (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Dan Rogerson (Liberal Democrat, North Cornwall) Amber Rudd (Conservative, Hastings and Rye) Nigel Adams (Conservative, Selby and Ainsty) and Mr David Anderson (Labour, Blaydon) were members of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/efracom Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Richard Cooke (Clerk), Lucy Johnson (Second Clerk), Sarah Coe (Committee Specialist—Environment), Rebecca Ross (Committee Specialist—Agriculture), Clare Genis (Senior Committee Assistant), Jim Lawford and Mandy Sullivan (Committee Assistants) and Hannah Pearce (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5774; the Committee’s e-mail address is: [email protected]. Media inquiries should be addressed to Hannah Pearce on 020 7219 8430. Farming in the Uplands 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 4 Background 4 2 The Commission for Rural Communities 7 3 An integrated strategy for the uplands 10 Defining the uplands 10 A new national strategy for the uplands 12 Leadership 14 4 Future funding for upland farming 16 Single Payment Scheme 17 Stocking rates 20 Uplands Entry Level Stewardship Scheme (UELS) 22 Common Agricultural Policy reform 24 Alternative sources of income 26 Carbon Markets 27 Water Markets 29 Tourism 30 Future development 32 Broadband 33 5 Upland communities 35 National Parks 38 Access to development funding by rural enterprises 40 6 Conclusion 43 Annex 44 Conclusions and recommendations 48 Formal Minutes 54 Witnesses 55 List of written evidence 55 List of additional written evidence 55 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 56 Farming in the Uplands 3 Summary The uplands are rare and beautiful landscapes which have been formed in large part by generations of agricultural endeavour. The future of these valuable landscapes and the communities that live there depend on hill farming remaining as the principle form of land management. The Commission for Rural Communities (CRC) was established to promote awareness of rural needs; represent rural communities; provide advice to Government on rural issues; collect data and conduct research. The CRC has strived to make all government departments consider the needs of rural communities when making and implementing policy. The Government has decided to abolish the Commission for Rural Communities—it therefore falls to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and its Ministers to continue the work of the Commission and to act as the advocate for rural communities within Government. This inquiry builds on the CRC’s report High ground, high potential—a future for England’s upland communities. In responding to this report and the CRC’s report, Defra must produce an uplands strategy that sets out a clear, costed action plan that sets out how it will ensure that hill farming in the uplands can be viable and thrive. Many hill farms struggle to make sufficient income and would fail without subsidy provided through the Common Agricultural Policy. Farming must remain at the centre of any strategy for the uplands. Defra must tackle the main barriers to hill farming becoming viable, including the management and delivery of agri-environment schemes and the Single Payment Scheme. The reform of the Common Agricultural Policy will be decided later this year. The reformed CAP must provide incentives and mechanisms to encourage hill farmers to make the most of the opportunities in the uplands. Upland farming would benefit from a return to a limited form of coupled payment. The Government must enable hill farmers to make a financial return from the provision of public goods such as carbon storage and water management. Hill farmers will require access to improved knowledge transfer and extension services to make the most of those opportunities, as well as improving agricultural productivity and sustainability. Upland farmers also need the tools and support to enable them to diversify to supplement their farming activity. Upland communities should be given the opportunity to develop. Access to the internet through superfast broadband is one element of that development. The Government should support upland communities by assisting local planning authorities to provide affordable housing. Upland communities and hill farmers should not be disadvantaged in respect of accessing grants, particularly the Rural Development Programme for England. The Government must decide whether it wishes agriculture in the uplands to continue. The maintenance of the uplands’ unique and precious landscapes depends on supporting hill farming and ensuring they have a future. 4 Farming in the Uplands 1 Introduction Background 1. The English uplands include some of the most dramatic and cherished landscapes in the country.1 There is no precise definition of ‘uplands’—they are semi-natural habitats, including wet and dry dwarf shrub heaths, blanket bog and other mires, scrub, bracken and grasslands (including acid, calcareous and neutral). The uplands are largely, but not exclusively, above the upper limits of enclosed farmland and have to some extent been formed by generations of agricultural activity.2 This inquiry was prompted in part by our recognition of the special nature of agriculture in the uplands and the Commission for Rural Communities’ (CRC) report on the uplands, High ground, high potential—a future for England’s upland communities.3 2. We announced the inquiry on 16 September4 and received 25 written submissions.5 We took oral evidence from Dr Stuart Burgess, the Chairman of the CRC and Rural Advocate, Professor Mark Shucksmith, Commissioner, CRC, Tenant Farmers Association (TFA),6 National Farmers Union (NFU) and Country Land and Business Association (CLA),7 and English National Park Authorities Association (ENPAA)8 and the Minister of State for Agriculture and Food, James Paice MP.9 We are very grateful to all those who helped us with our inquiry. 3. The CRC launched its inquiry into the future of England’s upland communities on 11 February 2009. The aim of the inquiry was to “identify and evaluate the drivers of change in upland communities, and to develop policy recommendations to enable and equip them to move towards more secure, economically prosperous and sustainable futures”.10 In High ground, high potential the CRC explained the rationale for undertaking its inquiry: ...the English uplands are valuable national assets worthy of protection not only in their own right but because of the many natural and cultural resources they generate. 1 In this inquiry we have used the same definition of the uplands as the Commission for Rural Communities. See High ground, high potential, page 26 2 See Ev 68 for description of upland geography and habitats. 3 High ground, high potential – a future for England’s upland communities, Commission for Rural Communities, 15 June 2010, Hereinafter ‘High ground, high potential’. 4 The Terms of reference for the inquiry are at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a- z/commons-select/environment-food-and-rural-affairs-committee/news/farming-in-the-uplands/ 5 Written evidence to the inquiry is at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons- select/environment-food-and-rural-affairs-committee/publications/ 6 George Dunn, Chief Executive, and Mike Keeble, Uplands Spokesman, Tenant Farmers Association 7 Dr Andrew Clark, Head of Policy, NFU, Will Cockbain, Uplands Spokesman, NFU, William Worsley, President, CLA, and Professor Allan Buckwell, Director of Policy, CLA 8 Dr Nigel Stone, Chief Executive, Exmoor National Park, and Peter Barfoot, Head of Conservation, North York Moors National Park, English National Park Authorities Association 9 Accompanied by Jeremy Eppel, Deputy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Tuesday Volume 551 23 October 2012 No. 54 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 23 October 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 813 23 OCTOBER 2012 814 Mr Bone: The Conservative-led coalition Government House of Commons are increasing spending on the NHS, unlike what Labour would do. In my constituency, we will get an urgent care Tuesday 23 October 2012 centre in a few months as a result of Tory health reforms. People in Corby already have an urgent care centre as a result of Tory reforms. Does the Secretary of The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock State agree that, while Labour talks about the NHS, Conservatives deliver on the NHS? PRAYERS Mr Hunt: I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend. Indeed, last week we announced that waiting times are [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] at near-record lows. The number of hospital-acquired infections continues to go down and mixed-sex wards have been virtually eliminated. I am very pleased that BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS my hon. Friend has an urgent care centre, and am sure that Mrs Bone will appreciate it even more than he does. NEW WRITs Ordered, Grahame M. Morris (Easington) (Lab): Does the That the Speaker do issue his Warrant to the Clerk of the Secretary of State recognise that the Office for National Crown to make out a new Writ for the electing of a Member to Statistics survey shows that the
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Crisis of Scottish Agriculture
    Scottish Government Yearbook 1985 THE REAL CRISIS OF SCOTTISH AGRICULTURE DUNCAN CAMPBELL DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH Scottish and British agriculture has over the past fifty years undergone a transformation so profound that it is barely recognisable from the past. State support, technological innovation, new practices, new products have all transformed the agrarian economy and society of Scotland, and, in many places, the face of the land itself. This article attempts to identify and evaluate the most important economic and political developments bearing upon Scottish agriculture in the Seventies and Eighties. We start, however, with a brief history of agriculture support policies in Britain. The "Great Depression" to 1939 British agriculture reached its zenith of prosperity in the 1860s. Around 1875 it entered a period of sustained depression-of falling product and land prices, lower rents and untenanted farms- which was to continue for almost forty years, ending only with the outbreak of world war. It was in this period that farming finally ceased to be Britain's major industry, unable to compete with imports of cheap grain and meat from Latin America, Australia, New Zealand and the American prairies. The effects of what became known as the "Great Depression" were most marked in the wheat growing areas of England. Scottish farming, being more dependent on stock activities and with only a small-scale involvement in wheat production, survived the shock of the depression better. If Symon is to be believed this was due also in no small measure to the moral sturdiness and resourcefulness of the Scottish farmer, who countered adversity by, " ..
    [Show full text]
  • The UK & Europe
    The UK & Europe: The UK & Europe: Costs, Benefits, Options. Options. Benefits, Costs, The UK & Europe: Costs, Benefits, Options. The Regent’s Report 2013 The Report 2013 Regent’s Regent’s University London is one of the UK’s most respected independent universities and one of the most internationally diverse, with around 140 different student nationalities on campus. To order additional copies or download a digital version please visit www.regents.ac.uk/europereport Web www.regents.ac.uk/europereport Email [email protected] Price £25 1 The UK & Europe: Costs, Benefits, Options. The Regent’s Report 2013 © Regent’s University London. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form by any means without permission of the publishers. Published as part of the Institute of Contemporary European Studies at Regent’s University London. ISSN 2040-6059 (paper) ISSN 2040-6517 (online) First published in Great Britain in 2013 as part by Regent’s University London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4NS Printed by Belmont Press Typeset in Baskerville / Gill Sans Design by External Relations at Regent’s University London The information in this publication is distributed on an “as is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation, neither the authors nor Regent’s University London shall have any direct liability to any person or organisation with respect to loss or damage caused or allegedly caused by use of the information provided. For more information please contact [email protected] Errata: Any corrections of amendments made after publication can be found at regents.ac.uk/europereport/errata 2 Vice Chancellor’s Foreword I hope that you find this Report informative and illuminating, and that it helps you to contribute to this important debate over the next few years.
    [Show full text]
  • National 4/5 Geography Rural Change Summary Notes and Past
    National 4/5 Geography Rural Change Summary Notes and Past Paper Questions 1 National 4/5 Geography Rural Change By the end of this unit you will: 1. Be able to explain key terms in farming 2. Be able to describe and explain the main characteristics of a rural landscape in a developed country (extensive commercial farming in East Anglia) 3. Be able to describe and explain changes that have taken place, the reasons and the impact of these, in a rural landscape in a developed country 4. Be able to describe and explain the main characteristics of a rural landscape in a developing country (intensive subsistence farming in India) 5. Be able to describe and explain changes that have taken place, the reasons and the impact of these, in a rural landscape in a developing country Introduction Types of Farming Intensive Farming Intensive farms generally take up a fairly small area of land, but aim to have a very high output, through massive inputs of capital and labour. These farms use machines and new technologies to become as efficient and cost-effective as possible. Extensive Farming Extensive farming is the direct opposite of intensive farming. The farms are large in comparison to the money injected into them or the labour used. The cattle ranches of central Australia area good example of extensive agriculture, where often only a few farm workers are responsible for thousands of acres of farmland. Subsistence Farming Subsistence farmers only produce enough to feed themselves and their family, without having any more to sell for profit.
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities∗
    Ind. Jn. of Agri.Econ. Vol.66, No.1, Jan.-March 2011 Hill Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities∗ Tej Partap† I PREFACE The Farmers Commission, “Serving farmers and saving farming” points to rising acute agricultural distress in the rainfed areas of the country, which also includes hilly areas. It lists five basic cause factors that are central to the crisis; unfinished land reforms, water scarcity, technology fatigue-access-adequacy, institutional support and opportunities for marketing. While working for the National Commission on Farmers as a hill agriculture expert, the contributions on the hill agriculture perspective, gathered knowledge and information about the Himalayan farmers’ state of affairs, of global experiences etc., made by me in compiling the hill farmers section of the main report of the commission also form the basis of this paper. The focus of this paper is on highlighting the challenges facing hill farmers and how they can be addressed. The paper first dwells on the scale and dimensions of the problems of hill farmers including the two most significant common concerns, increasing crop land scarcity and water scarcity to maintain agriculture on marginal lands. It explains various dimensions of the new thinking on marginal lands and implications. The next section, describes how similar problems were addressed by other nations successfully. To highlight the point that technological options are and have been available, the report cites examples of right technological hits of the Himalayan region. The last section analyses the opportunities to find solutions to the hill farmers’ distress. Much of the farming development efforts made in the hills in the past were based on the poor understanding of the hill/mountain conditions, resources, environment and the socio-cultural setting of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the an English Agribusiness Lobby Group
    Understanding the NFU an English Agribusiness Lobby Group Ethical Consumer Research Association December 2016 Understanding the NFU - an English Agribusiness Lobby-group ECRA December 2016 1 Contents 1. Introduction – The NFU an English Agribusiness Lobby group 3 2. Economic Lobbying – undermining the smaller farmer 2.1 NFU and farm subsidies – promoting agribusiness at the expense of smaller farmers 11 2.2 NFU and TTIP – favouring free trade at the expense of smaller farms 15 2.3 NFU and supermarkets – siding with retailers and opposing the GCA 17 2.4 NFU and foot and mouth disease – exports prioritised over smaller producers 20 3. Environmental Lobbying – unconcerned about sustainability 3.1 NFU, bees and neonicotinoids – risking it all for a few pence more per acre 24 3.2 NFU and soil erosion – opposing formal protection 28 3.3 NFU and air pollution – opposing EU regulation 31 3.4 NFU, biodiversity and meadows – keeping the regulations away 33 3.5 NFU and Europe – keeping sustainability out of the CAP 41 3/6 NFU and climate change – a mixed response 47 3.7 NFU and flooding – not listening to the experts? 51 4. Animal interventions – keeping protection to a minimum 4.1 Farm animal welfare – favouring the megafarm 53 4.2 NFU, badgers and bovine TB – driving a cull in the face of scientific evidence 60 4.3 The Red Tractor label – keeping standards low 74 5. Social Lobbying – passing costs on to the rest of us 5.1 NFU and Organophosphates in sheep dip – failing to protect farmers’ health 78 5.2 NFU and road safety – opposing regulations 82 5.3 NFU and workers’ rights – opposing the Agricultural Wages Board 86 5.4 NFU and Biotechnology – Supporting GM crops 89 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Farming – an Opinion on the Future
    1 Hill farming – An opinion on the future G.W.SHEATH Agricultural Systems Consultant, Hamilton. Introduction very much ignored in today’s world, both from a This paper is not a formal review of hill farming political and service perspective. literature. Rather, it is my view on the critical challenges and changes that we need to deal with if mixed livestock Relevance of Hill Land farming on hill lands is to be successful over the next 20 As we move into the 2010s, why care about hill years. It is my hope that industry leaders, policy makers farming? Some very interesting statistics have been and agribusiness managers will give consideration to recently produced by Rob Davison, Beef+Lamb New these views. Zealand. Some people say that it is not smart to look into the 1990-91 2010-11 rear-vision mirror, but I do not agree. Having a better Nos. Ha Nos. Ha understanding of the consequences of past events can help guide future decisions and changes. During the 40 Hill Farms 7,500 6.8m 6,245 6.0m years that I have worked with hill farming communities Finishing/ 12,100 3.3m 6,365 2.3m there have been several distinct phases of activity and Breeding Farms mood: It is estimated that currently half of our mixed livestock 1970s: Land development and increased livestock farming businesses are located on hill land; and from numbers, the 6.0 m ha involved, approximately 65% of lamb and 1980s: Despair and searching for new options, prime beef cattle are supplied from hill farms as store or 1990s: Intensification of mixed livestock systems finished animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Vermin, Victims Disease
    Vermin, Victims and Disease British Debates over Bovine Tuberculosis and Badgers ANGELA CASSIDY Vermin, Victims and Disease Angela Cassidy Vermin, Victims and Disease British Debates over Bovine Tuberculosis and Badgers Angela Cassidy Centre for Rural Policy Research (CRPR) University of Exeter Exeter, UK ISBN 978-3-030-19185-6 ISBN 978-3-030-19186-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19186-3 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 This book is an open access under a CC BY 4.0 license via link.springer.com. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW MASTER FACTSHEET 1-04.Qxd
    Farming on Dartmoor Dartmoor Factsheet Prehistoric times to the present day For over 5,000 years farming has been the Reaves are low, stony, earth covered banks main land use on Dartmoor. Working and which were built around 1200 BC to divide re-working the land, farmers have created all but the highest parts of Dartmoor, and maintained a large part of the Dartmoor first into territories (a little like our present landscape. Today over 90% of the land day parishes), and within those into long, within the National Park boundary is used narrow, parallel fields. Their main function for farming. Much of this area is both open was probably to control the movement of and enclosed moorland where livestock is stock, but there is some evidence that grazed, and the remainder is made up of prehistoric people were also growing fringe enclosed farmland which mainly cereals here. A climatic deterioration and the comprises improved grassland. In addition, spread of peat during the first millennium woods, shelterbelts, wetlands, rough pasture, BC (1000 - 1 BC), both resulting in poorer traditional buildings and archaeological grazing vegetation, contributed to the features all contribute to the character abandonment of the higher part of of the farmed land. Dartmoor during the later prehistoric period. The well-being of the hill farming community The Medieval Period is fundamental to the future of Dartmoor as a National Park in landscape, cultural, ecological Improvement of the climate in medieval times and enjoyment terms and for the viability and allowed the re-occupation of the moorland sustainability of the local rural community.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming & Food
    FARMING & FOOD a sustainable future Report of the Policy Commission on the Future of Farming and Food January January © Crown Copyright Set in Adobe Jenson Pro and Lucida Sans Printed on environmentally friendly paper made with totally chlorine- free pulps from plantation forests and recycled fibre, de-inked without the use of chlorine. is document is also available from the Cabinet Office web site at: http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/farming CONTENTS Foreword • • Vision • • Where we are now • • Profit • • Environment • • People • Summary of recommendations • • Approach • • Consultation responses • Policy Commission on the Future of Farming and Food Members Sir Donald Curry (Chairman) Helen Browning Sir Peter Davis Iain Ferguson Deirdre Hutton DeAnne Julius Fiona Reynolds Mark Tinsley David Varney Graham Wynne FOREWORD in August . Our remit was to “advise the Government on Whow we can create a sustainable, competi- tive and diverse farming and food sector which contrib- utes to a thriving and sustainable rural economy, advances environmental, economic, health and animal welfare goals, and is consistent with the Government’s aims for Common Agricultural Policy () reform, enlargement of the and increased trade liberalisation”. Our remit covered England. is document is our report to the Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. We have tried to keep the report short and readable. We have therefore restricted the text to a statement of our findings and recommendations. ere has not been space here to summarise or debate the large amount of evidence put to us. But it should be clear from what we have written how much we have been influenced by what we have seen, heard and read over the last five months.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2015 Cresset January Issue 423
    January 2015 Cresset January Issue 423 A HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL OUR READERS I hope you were all able to have an enjoyable Christmas break and did all the things and saw all the people that you wanted to see. I also hope you were friendly with those that you had to see! Christmas apparently is the third most stressful time after divorce and house selling! Turkey all done and no more pigs in blankets for another twelve months. New Year resolutions need to be taken up in earnest or the old ones wheeled out again for another airing. The New Year gives us all the excuse, if we need it, or the opportunity at least, to start something anew. Whether that is career, relationships or the way we go about things. We should all sit back and assess whether what we do is achieving what we want. If it is not doing so, then there is ultimately only one person who can change that. Enough philosophising from me. On to more immediate things that affect us here in Bottisham. Planning application now in for the new housing development on the old Crystal Structures site and the outcome may well be decided by the time you read this. It is hoped that it will provide not only new housing, but an element of local employment as well. The outline plans for the additional houses in Ox meadow have been publicised and will no doubt be submitted shortly. If you have any interest in the growth of this village, and I am sure you do, then remember you can always see the planning applications on line when they are submitted and the Parish Council also receives copy of those plans.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Farming in Exmoor 2015 Report
    The State of Farming in Exmoor 2015 Final report, 21 May 2015 Prepared by Janet Dwyer, Jane Mills, John Powell, Nick Lewis, Pete Gaskell and Jonathan Felton; CCRI, University of Gloucestershire Summary of Project Project Title: The State of Farming in Exmoor, 2015 Client Reference: Start Date: November 2014 Finish Date: May 2015 Duration: 6 months Project Manager Janet Dwyer, Professor of Rural Policy, Director of CCRI Research Team (all CCRI): Janet Dwyer Peter Gaskell Jane Mills John Powell Nick Lewis Jonathan Felton Date of Report: 8 May 2015 University of Gloucestershire Oxstalls Lane Gloucester Gloucestershire GL2 9HW www.ccri.ac.uk When quoting this report please use the following citation: Dwyer, J., Mills, J., Powell, J. Lewis, N., Gaskell, P., Felton, J. (2015) The State of Farming in Exmoor, 2015, Final Report to North Devon Plus. CCRI: Gloucester. 1 Acknowledgements and disclaimers We are grateful for all the practical help and information provided by Katherine Williams and Jenny Carey-Wood in particular, and all Exmoor Hill Farming Network steering group members, during the course of this research, as well as to all the farmers who returned questionnaires and took part in the workshop and/or telephone survey. Many provided detailed information over and above what was asked for, and all of this has been extremely useful to us. All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by the University of Gloucestershire, the Exmoor Hill Farming Network, North Devon Plus or the Exmoor National Park Authority.
    [Show full text]