The Art of the Oklad Wendy Salmond Chapman University, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Art of the Oklad Wendy Salmond Chapman University, Salmond@Chapman.Edu Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons Art Faculty Articles and Research Art Fall 1996 The Art of the Oklad Wendy Salmond Chapman University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/art_articles Recommended Citation Salmond, Wendy. "The Art of the Oklad." The Post 3.2 (1996): 5-16. Print. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Art Faculty Articles and Research by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Art of the Oklad Comments This article was originally published in The Post by the Hillwood Museum, volume 3, issue 2, in 1996. Copyright Hillwood Museum This article is available at Chapman University Digital Commons: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/art_articles/82 ~ AUTUMN 5 n 1904 a team of restorers A similar story could be told embarked on preserving the of countless other oklads that I celebrated icon of the Old once a dorned Russian icons Testament Trinity, which had but were removed in the 20th been painted by Andrei Rublev century in response to a mod- between 1422 and 1427.l The ern aesthetic that saw the .---lhe- 'Po7f- project, initiated by the noted painted icon as a work of art, collector Ilya Ostroukhov, the metal oklad as merely a 3cz.. ) involved removing layers of dirt vulgar display of wealth. --Au,~MV\ \qq~ and olifa (linseed oil), and the Today, it requires an act of if :1 THE ART OF THE OKLAD f• ·I by Dr. Wendy R. Salmond, Visiting Curator !1 I areas of repainting that imagination to appreci- Detail. Okladfrom had accrued over the ate the integral role Jeon ofSt. Nicholas centuries. Before that Ok} ads On Ce ofVelikoretsk, see fig. 6. work could begin, played in the mean- however, the icon ing of medieval had to be separated icons such as Rub- from its oklad,2 a cov- 1e v' s Trinity. To ering of beautifully visualize what the chased solid gold majority of early through w hich only Russian icons must the faces, hands, and have looked like feet of the three with their covers angels were visi- \ intact, we must ble (fig. 1). With turn to the pri- its precious bur- vate devotional den of jeweled icon of the haloes, necklaces, 18th and 19th and collars, the centuries, a Trinity's oklad source that exemplified a cen- is only now turies-old tradition of honoring attracting the notice of scholars important icons with donations and collectors. Usually small and adornments, a tradition images reserved for private use that expanded the icon's role as in chapels or bedrooms, lovingly "a w indow onto heaven" by. preserved in special cases (kiots), ·building "a kind of fragile an9. passed down through gen- bridge which aspired to unite erations, these devotional icons heaven and earth."3 When the have miraculously survived with restoration was completed, the their covers intact, either oklad was not replaced. Instead, . because they continued to be it was permanently retired to the used for religious purposes until museum of the Troitse-Sergieva quite recently, or be.cause they Lavra, where it remains as ended up in private collections 'a sumptuou s example of the where the oklad was appreciated jeweler's craft, its original func- as highly as the icon. This is par- tion and meaning more or less ticularly true of the icons that forgotten. Mrs. Post acquired during her I ~ I ' 6 AUTUMN I I ! ' ' ~ : ' I I Ffg. I more than thirty years as a col- Russian culture is almost as old l· Ok/ad from the Old lector of Russian art and now as that of the icon itself. The j Testament Trinity icon, form a significant part of the . first painted .icons were 16th- 18th centuries. Hillwood collection. Over half brought from Constantinople l Painted by An drei of these are personal icons that to the city of Kiev around 988, Rublev. Gold, silver retain the metal covers with the year in which Grand Duke gilt; pearls, precious which their former owners Vladimir of Kiev converted to stones, 140 x 115 cm. sougl).t to express their reli- Eastern Orthodoxy, the religion Sergiev Posad Ml gious piety and, frequently, of the Byzantine empire. As and History Museum their awareness of changing physical embodiments of the I : I artistic fashions, particularly central Christian mystery-that i the western European styles Christ was both divine and i introduced into Russian art in mortal, spirit and flesh-icons the 18th and 19th centuries.4 acted as intermediaries between !i The history of the oklad in the earthly and the heavenly { AUTU MN• 7 worlds. Their painted images of the background of the icon, or, Christ, the Mother of God, and less frequently, by complete the saints provided a visible metal covers that revealed only presence through which the the faces, hands, and feet of the faithful could gain access to the holy personages depicted. invisible realm of the spirit. A Certainly, by the 16th century clear distinction was drawn, the practice of adorning icons _however, between the worship with a multitude of gifts had of icons (i.e., idolatry) and their become firmly established as an veneration, since all honor essential component of icon directed towards the painted veneration (ikonopochitanie). On image was actually intended a daily basis the veneration of for the holy personage repre- holy images took the form of sented. In the words of St. Basil lighting candles and icon lamps the Great, "The homage paid to before the icons, purifying the image is transmitted to the them with incense, bowing original." 5 and prostrating before them, The custom of honoring and especially kissing them icons with covers made of pre- (lobzanie). The donation of an cious materials (gold and silver, oklad or other adornmept to a pearls, and precious stones) particular icon was considered was introduced to Russia as an act of special piety, one that early as the 11th century.6 brought favor to the donor and Initially, such costly embellish- honor to the holy image. In ments were reserved for only addition to commissioning an the most venerated icons, such oklad for a previously un- as those that performed mirac- adorned icon, a pious donor ulous cures or protected the could refurbish or add to an Russian people from their ene- icon's existing oklad in many mies. Thus, the icon of the ways. In the case of Rubiev's Vladimir Mother of God (so i con of the Old Testament called because of its role as pro- Trinity, for example, by the tector of the city of Vladimir) mid-18th century the icon's was covered with a gold and adornments included haloes jewel-encrusted oklad soon donated in the 16th century by after it was brought to Kiev Boris Godunov, a panagia (a from Constantinople in 1136. bishop's pendant with an After this initial cover was image of Christ or the Mother stolen by the Mongols in 1237, of God) given by Fedor three more were made for the Godunov, and crescent collars icon in the course of the next (tsatas) given by Tsar Mikhail four centuries, thereby empha- Romanov in 1626, all embell- sizing the central role that the ishing a gold cover given by the Vladimir Mother of God played monks of the Troitse Lavra in in the political and religious life 1754.8 Although including the of medieval Russia.7 ·donor's own image on either Judging from the mesh icon or oklad apparently was of tiny nail holes that scar the frowned upon (unli~e in the surface of many Russian religious art of Italy and icons from the "Golden Age" Byzantium), oblique personal (roughly the 13th to the early references to the donor were 16th centuries), a surprisingly permitted with the inclusion of high number of icons were at personal sa'ints on the icon's one time covered, either by borders (see fig. 6). thin metal strips stamped with The oklad also protected the ornamental patterns (bas'ma) holy image beneath in both a and nailed to the borders and literal and a symbolic sense. On ~ 8 AUTUMN a purely physi cal level, it 17th-century image of the h elped to m itigate the Kazan Mother of God (fig. 2).10 inevitable side effects of daily Here, the symmetrical scrolls of veneration, such as oils and foliate ornament on the bas'ma abrasion from the constant border carry over onto the kissing of the icon's surface, attached haloes, diadem, and and soot and grime from the collar, all of which are studded .candles, lamp oil and incense. with cabochon paste stones set Equally important, it helped to in toothed cages. The ground of define the boundaries between the icon (the svet, literally, the this world and the one beyond, "light") is also covered with serving as "an intermediary metal bas'ma strips, leaving free j between God or the Saints only the bust-length figures of 'i installed in their paradisiacal the Mother of God and the sojourn, and the faithful offer- Christ Child. Evidently, this f ing up his prayers to them."9 icon was covered as a single At its peak in the 16th and commission, and its rather 17th centuries, the art of the modest "off the shelf''. adorn- oklad-and of icon adornment ments remained undisturbed in the broadest sense-had over the intervening centuries. expanded to include the ele- In addition to these basic ' t' ments of an entire "wardrobe" adornments, the central figures ! Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Church Bulletin Russian Orthodox Church “St
    “КРАСНОЕ СОЛНЫШКО” “SUNSHINE” CHURCH BULLETIN RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH “ST. VLADIMIR”, HOUSTON DECEMBER 2009 The most pure Temple of the Savior, The precious Chamber and Virgin, The sacred Treasure of the glory of God, Is presented today to the house of the Lord. She brings with her the grace of the Spirit, Which the angels of God do praise. Truly this woman is the Abode of Heaven! Kontakion in Tone 4 The Entry into the Temple of the Most-holy Theotokos "When the Most-holy Virgin Mary reached the age of three, her holy parents Joachim and Anna took her from Nazareth to Jerusalem to dedicate her to the service of God according to their earlier promise. It was a three-day journey from Nazareth to Jerusalem but, traveling to do a God-pleasing work, this journey was not difficult for them. Many kinsmen of Joachim and Anna gathered in Jerusalem to take part in this event, at which the invisible angels of God were also present. Leading the procession into the Temple were virgins with lighted tapers in their hands, then the Most-holy Virgin, led on one side by her father and on the other side by her mother. The virgin was clad in vesture of royal magnificence and adornments as was befitting the ``King's daughter, the Bride of God'' (Psalm 45:13-15). Following them were many kinsmen and friends, all with lighted tapers. Fifteen steps led up to the Temple. Joachim and Anna lifted the Virgin onto the first step, then she ran quickly to the top herself, where she was met by the High Priest Zacharias, who was to be the father of St.
    [Show full text]
  • This Content Downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec
    This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions LETTERS FROM HEAVEN: POPULAR RELIGION IN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions This page intentionally left blank This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Edited by JOHN­PAUL HIMKA and ANDRIY ZAYARNYUK Letters from Heaven Popular Religion in Russia and Ukraine UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Toronto Buffalo London This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions www.utppublishing.com © University of Toronto Press Incorporated 2006 Toronto Buffalo London Printed in Canada ISBN­13: 978­0­8020­9148­2 ISBN­10: 0­8020­9148­2 Printed on acid­free paper Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Letters from heaven : popular religion in Russia and Ukraine / edited by John•Paul Himka and Andriy Zayarnyuk. ISBN­13: 978­0­8020­9148­2 ISBN­10: 0­8020­9148­2 1. Russia – Religion – History. 2. Ukraine – Religion – History. 3. Religion and culture – Russia (Federation) – History. 4. Religion and culture – Ukraine – History. 5. Eastern Orthodox Church – Russia (Federation) – History. 6. Eastern Orthodox Church – Ukraine – History. I. Himka, John•Paul, 1949– II. Zayarnyuk, Andriy, 1975– BX485.L48 2006 281.9 947 C2006­903711­6 University of Toronto Press acknowledges the financial assistance to its publishing program of the Canada Council for the Arts and the Ontario Arts Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Akathist-To-Our-Lady-Of-Sitka-1
    Akathist Service to Our Lady of Sitka The Sitka Icon of the Mother of God Located at the Cathedral of Saint Michael the Archangel in Sitka, Alaska is one of the most revered Icons in North America: the Sitka Mother of God. This Icon has been attributed to a famous Iconographer, Vladimir Lukich Borovikovsky (1758-1826), a protégé of the Empress Catherine II who was instructed at the Academy of Arts in Saint Petersburg, Russia. In addition to being a great portrait painter, Borovikovsky also painted many of the Icons for the Cathedral of the Kazan Icon in Saint Petersburg. Painted in the style of the Kazan Mother of God Icon, on canvas, the Sitka Mother of God Icon is 36 x 17-1/2 inches in size. An exceptionally beautiful and detailed riza of silver covers the Icon of the Theotokos and Christ child, and the Image of God the Father blessing from above. The Cathedral received the Icon as a gift from the laborers of the Russian American Company in 1850, two years after the Cathedral was completed. Even with their meager wages, these men generously made their contribution to the Church. Miracles have been attributed to the Sitka Mother of God Icon over the years. It is believed that the gaze of the eyes of the Theotokos have led to the restored health of those who prayed before the Icon. I Because of the peaceful gaze of the Theotokos, the Icon has been described as a “pearl of Russian ecclesiastical art of ineffable gentleness, purity and harmony....” And “...the most beautiful face of the Mother of God with the Divine Child in her arms is so delicately and artistically done that the more one looks at it the more difficult it is to tear one’s gaze away.” Originally part of the main Iconostasis at the Cathedral of Saint Michael the Archangel in Sitka, Alaska, the Icon is now permanently located on the far left side of the Iconostasis in a special place of honor.
    [Show full text]
  • Iconografia Prebizantina Bizantina E Postbizantina
    For.D Iconografia Prebizantina Bizantina e Postbizantina Pasqua 2009 In copertina: Icona copta XIII° sec. Monastero di Santa Caterina Sinai Iconografia bizantina e postbizantina INDICE INDICE ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduzione....................................................................................................... 7 Come era percepita l’immagine nell’antichità ................................................. 10 Breve storia della contesa iconoclasta ............................................................. 11 Conseguenze della contesa iconoclasta sull’arte bizantina .............................. 15 Ingresso della fede ortodossa nel mondo slavo ............................................... 16 IL VOLTO DI CRISTO .......................................................................................... 19 Introduzione .................................................................................................. 21 Le contese cristologiche dei primi secoli ....................................................... 22 Le prime immagini preiconoclaste................................................................. 23 Le immagini posticonoclaste ......................................................................... 35 L’immagine di Cristo detto ‘Pantocrator’ ...................................................... 36 L’immagine di Cristo detta ‘Acheropoieta’ o ‘Non Dipinta da Mano Umana’ 44 L’immagine di
    [Show full text]
  • Attributing the Zvenigorodsky Chin
    DISCOVERIES Attributing the Zvenigorodsky Chin Levon Nersesyan talks with Oxana Golovko Translated by Vera Winn Artistic Technique were moving backward and forward. Note: On June 26, In the latter case, the final image 2017, the State Levon, tell us how you discovered rarely corresponds with the prepara- Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow held a that the Zvenigorodsky Chin was tory drawings, and there are quite a press conference on not painted by Andrei Rublev. few corrections even in the prepara- the authorship of the tory drawing itself. It is obvious that Zvenigorodskiy Chin, a A difference in painting technique the first master was accustomed to famous depiction of the Deisis (suppli- between the Zvenigorodsky Chin and working out all the details clearly and cation) featuring the the Holy Trinity is clearly visible with- neatly from the very beginning, while Archangel Michael, out the use of any scientific devices, the second created a rough sketch Christ, and St. Paul. but before we drew any conclusions, and then modified the form of the im- This triptych was long attributed to the it was necessary to analyze the tech- age in the process of painting. 14th–15th century niques used as accurately and ob- iconographer Andrei jectively as possible, and only then Careful microscopic examination and Rublev, but scientists to compare the objects visually. We microphotography of the paintings and restorers now be- lieve the icons were followed a universal, internation- enabled us to clarify the number and painted by a different ally recognized method of extensive sequence of paint layers. These tech- hand, or possibly by analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Prolog (Round Two)1
    Appendix 2: Prolog (round two)1 Note on the genre: A famous writer once said that all happy families are alike, whereas the miseries of unhappy ones are diverse. This observation also holds true for saints’ lives. (I have tried to present a diverse selection, but you must have noticed patterns.) Another comparison may be made to iconography: proper icons do not contain superfluous information. Even unnecessary details in the background distract from the main subject - the serene faces; whereas the disproportionate anatomy, so shocking to the unaccustomed eye, is of no consequence. Likewise, if a person displayed his faith in martyrdom, the details of his previous life are immaterial. The focus of the narrative is entirely on what is pertinent and the seeming exaggerations do not deter from this, they underline it. If the words spoken during a passionate trial seem scripted and unbelievable, remember: the ancients had no knowledge of quotation marks and the text simply conveys the essence of what transpired. These people were subjected to experiences that we cannot imagine - this we readily believe; so to give us some idea of that experience, the writer uses imagery that we cannot easily imagine. Moreover, if a thousand people are tortured is it not evident that the bodies of a few will display marvelous tenacity? And is it not “marvelous” to see a man or woman fearless of death, when you, the ancient writer, have countless times watched criminals running away from soldiers and beasts at the local arena? Prolog contains about a thousand short martyrological vitas that closely follow the same pattern; these form the core of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing the Holy: Revetments on Late Byzantine Icons
    Framing the Holy: Revetments on Late Byzantine Icons by Elizabeth Yoder Moss A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Art University of Toronto © Copyright by Elizabeth Yoder Moss 2016 Framing the Holy: Revetments on Late Byzantine Icons Elizabeth Yoder Moss Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Art University of Toronto 2016 Abstract This study examines icon revetments produced during the late Byzantine period (1261–1453), situating them within the diversity of mixed-media, multisensory, and multivalent devotional images that combined personal piety with conspicuous consumption and the public spectacle of lavish patronage. These works are evidence of the “ornamental turn”—a paradigm shift marked by the increase of ornament on visual works that mediated wealth, spiritual devotion, and social power. Revetted icons do not make arguments about the faithful representation of prototypes; they make arguments about faithful veneration. Beginning with a historiographic study of ornament, the thesis examines how the ornamental vocabulary on revetments manifests relationships between specific decorated icons. Indices of ornament motifs and a catalogue of surviving icon revetments and frames from the eleventh through fifteenth centuries constitute the appendices. In chapter 2, I argue that the previously unstudied decorated strips added to the icon of the Mother of God Hodegetria in Ohrid were part of a larger project aimed at legitimizing Serbian emperor Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (r. 1331–55) and his archbishop Nicholas in Ohrid. They structured their leadership in the Balkans on their contemporaries in Constantinople. In chapter 3, I present a new reading of the dedicatory prayers inscribed on the icon of the Mother of God in Freising.
    [Show full text]
  • The Icon of the Pochayiv Mother of God: a Sacred Relic Between East and West
    The Icon of the Pochayiv Mother of God: A Sacred Relic between East and West Franklin Sciacca Hamilton College Clinton, New York Introduction There are myriad icons of the Mother of God that are designated as “miracle-working” (chudotvornyi in Ukrainian and Russian) in the Orthodox and Catholic lands of Eastern Europe. Thaumaturgic powers are often ascribed to the icon itself and therefore such panels are venerated with particular devotion. Pilgrims seek physical contact with these objects. From the lands of medieval Kievan Rus’, there are four surviving icons with Byzantine pedigree that achieved “miracle- working” status as early as the 11th c.: The Vladimir icon (known in Ukrainian tradition as Vyshhorod, after the location of the convent north of Kiev where it was originally kept); the Kievo-Pechersk icon of the Dormition; the Kholm icon (attributed to Evangelist Luke); and the so-called Black Madonna of Częstochowa (originally housed in Belz, and for the last 600 years in the Jasna Gora monastery in Poland). All of them are surrounded by complex folkloric legends of origin and accounts of miraculous interventions. In later centuries, numerous other wonder-working icons appeared in Ukrainian, Belarusian, Russian, Polish, Balkan lands, Figure 1: Pochayiv Mother Of among which is a relative late-comer (known from the late 16th c.)--The icon God in Dormition Cathedral, of the Mother and Child that was venerated at the Pochayiv monastery in Western Pochayiv Lavra. Ukraine. This small, originally domestic, icon achieved significant cult status throughout Eastern Europe, both in Orthodox and Catholic milieus. This article seeks to examine the origin of the icon in the context of the development of the monastery whose reputation was built as its repository.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism and the Spiritual in Russian Art New Perspectives
    Modernism and the Spiritual in Russian Art New Perspectives EDITED BY LOUISE HARDIMAN AND NICOLA KOZICHAROW To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/609 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Modernism and the Spiritual in Russian Art New Perspectives Edited by Louise Hardiman and Nicola Kozicharow https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2017 Louise Hardiman and Nicola Kozicharow. Copyright of each chapter is maintained by the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Louise Hardiman and Nicola Kozicharow, Modernism and the Spiritual in Russian Art: New Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0115 In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/609#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/609#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hospitality of Abraham in the Work of Julia Stankova, Painter of Bulgarian Icons
    THE JOURNAL OF ICON STUDIES VOLUME 2 | 2019 The Hospitality of Abraham in the Work of Julia Stankova, Painter of Bulgarian Icons François Bœspflug Translated by Jordan Daniel Wood Recommended Citation: François Boespflug, Jordan Daniel Wood (translator), “The Hospitality of Abraham in the Work of Julia Stankova, Painter of Bulgarian Icons,” Journal of Icons Studies 2 (2019) https://doi.org/10.36391/JIS2/004 Available at https://www.museumofrussianicons.org/hospitality-of-abraham/ Published by Museum of Russian Icons: https://www.museumofrussianicons.org/ Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. ISSN: 2473-7275 1 ©JOURNAL OF ICON STUDIES François Bœspflug The Hospitality of Abraham in the Work of Julia Stankova, Painter of Bulgarian Icons Translated by Jordan Daniel Wood Abstract This article seeks to make the work of the Bulgarian icon painter Julia Stankova better known to readers. It does so first by presenting her person, her trajectory, and her iconographical work. Then it offers an overview of her reflection on the relationships between the Bible and the icon. Finally, it analyzes a dozen icons that she has produced over the past twenty years on the theme of the Hospitality of Abraham as recounted in Genesis 18. Keywords: Old Testament Trinity, Julia Stankova, Hospitality of Abraham After centuries of oblivion or misapprehension, Eastern Christian art, especially the art of the icon, was the object of a veritable rediscovery in the West during the twentieth century.1 This rediscovery unfolded in several stages. The first was the shock felt in Russia upon the cleaning of Andrei Rublev’s icon of the Old Testament Trinity in 1905 and the removal of its riza (met- al cover).
    [Show full text]
  • St. Michael's Cathedral) Is in the Center of the Business District of Sitka, Alaska, the Town Which Was the Capital of Russian America from 1808 to 1867
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS UM only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections________________ 1. Name historic Cathedral of St. Michael the Archangel and or common St. Michael Cathedral 2. Location street & number Lincoln and Maksoutof f Streets not for publication city, town Sitka . vicinity of Alaska 02 Sitka Division 220 state code county code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum X bulldlng(s) X private unoccupied __ commercial park structure both __ work in progress educational __ private residence __ site Public Acquisition Accessible __ entertainment JL religious object in process X yes: restricted __ government scientific _^ _ b.eing considered . yes: unrestricted industrial __ transportation no __ military __ other: 4. Owner of Property name Orthodox Church in America c/o Diocese of Sitka and Alaska street & number BOX 697 city, town Sitka . vicinity of state Alaska 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Borough Recorder street & number City and Borough of Sitka city, town Sitka, state Alaska 6. Representation in Existing Surveys See Continuation Sheet title has this property been determined eligible? x yes no date . federal state county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one X excellent __ deteriorated unaltered x original site good ruins X altered moved date __ fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The Cathedral of St.
    [Show full text]
  • “Hands Off That Sacred Image!” the Vladimir Icon and Its Power
    “Hands off That Sacred Image!” The Vladimir Icon and Its Power Maria Sergeevna Bakatkina Department of Slavic Languages and Literature University of Virginia April 2017 2 Content Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………. 3 Chapter 1. The Vladimir Icon and Its Restorations …………………….………...…… 8 Chapter 2. A Journey of a Single Image through the History of Russia ...…………… 26 Chapter 3. The Reflection of the Vladimir Icon in Visual Arts ....………………….…47 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………….… 75 List of Images ……………………………………………………………….………... 76 Bibliography ……………………………………………………………….…………. 78 3 «Страшная история России вся прошла перед Твоим Лицом» - М. Волошин1 On December 4th, 1998, a Russian avant-garde artist, Avdei Ter-Ogan’ian, made a performance called The Young Atheist (“Юный безбожник”) as a part of the exhibition at Moscow Manege. His performance included three icons, the Vladimir icon, Spas Nerukotvornyi, and Pantocrator (Spas Vsederzhatel’), and a poster with the following words: Dear connoisseurs of contemporary art, here you can get a wonderful source for blasphemy. Spas Nerukotvornyi - 200 rubles; the Vladimir icon - 150 rubles; Spas Vsederzhatel’- 120 rubles. The gallery offers you the following services: Desecration of the icon purchased by young infidels - 50 rubles; You can desecrate the icon personally under the guidance of young atheists - 20 rubles; You can get advice for desecrating icons at home - 10 rubles.2 Nobody volunteered, and the artist began to cut the icons with an axe (fig. 1). After the performance the criminal case was initiated against the artist on charges of inciting religious hatred.3 To avoid punishment Ter-Ogan’ian fled to the Czech Republic, and in 2010 the case was closed due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
    [Show full text]