Вестник Удмуртского Университета 339 Удк 323.13(410+73) Е.С. Бурмистрова, А.А
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Far-Right Anthology
COUNTERINGDEFENDING EUROPE: “GLOBAL BRITAIN” ANDTHE THEFAR FUTURE RIGHT: OFAN EUROPEAN ANTHOLOGY GEOPOLITICSEDITED BY DR RAKIB EHSAN AND DR PAUL STOTT BY JAMES ROGERS DEMOCRACY | FREEDOM | HUMAN RIGHTS ReportApril No 2020. 2018/1 Published in 2020 by The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society Millbank Tower 21-24 Millbank London SW1P 4QP Registered charity no. 1140489 Tel: +44 (0)20 7340 4520 www.henryjacksonsociety.org © The Henry Jackson Society, 2020. All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily indicative of those of The Henry Jackson Society or its Trustees. Title: “COUNTERING THE FAR RIGHT: AN ANTHOLOGY” Edited by Dr Rakib Ehsan and Dr Paul Stott Front Cover: Edinburgh, Scotland, 23rd March 2019. Demonstration by the Scottish Defence League (SDL), with supporters of National Front and white pride, and a counter demonstration by Unite Against Facism demonstrators, outside the Scottish Parliament, in Edinburgh. The Scottish Defence League claim their protest was against the sexual abuse of minors, but the opposition claim the rally masks the SDL’s racist beliefs. Credit: Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert/Alamy Live News. COUNTERINGDEFENDING EUROPE: “GLOBAL BRITAIN” ANDTHE THEFAR FUTURE RIGHT: OFAN EUROPEAN ANTHOLOGY GEOPOLITICSEDITED BY DR RAKIB EHSAN AND DR PAUL STOTT BY JAMES ROGERS DEMOCRACY | FREEDOM | HUMAN RIGHTS ReportApril No 2020. 2018/1 Countering the Far Right: An Anthology About the Editors Dr Paul Stott joined the Henry Jackson Society’s Centre on Radicalisation and Terrorism as a Research Fellow in January 2019. An experienced academic, he received an MSc in Terrorism Studies (Distinction) from the University of East London in 2007, and his PhD in 2015 from the University of East Anglia for the research “British Jihadism: The Detail and the Denial”. -
Conservative Party
Royaume-Uni 73 élus Parti pour Démocrates libéraux Une indépendance de Parti conservateur ECR Parti travailliste PSE l’indépendance du Les Verts PVE ALDE l'Europe NI Royaume-Uni MELD 1. Vicky Ford MEP 1. Richard Howitt MEP 1. Andrew Duff MEP 1. Patrick O’Flynn 1. Paul Wiffen 1. Rupert Read 2. Geoffrey Van Orden 2. Alex Mayer 2. Josephine Hayes 2. Stuart Agnew MEP 2. Karl Davies 2. Mark Ereira-Guyer MEP 3. Sandy Martin 3. Belinda Brooks-Gordon 3. Tim Aker 3. Raymond Spalding 3. Jill Mills 3. David Campbell 4. Bhavna Joshi 4. Stephen Robinson 4. Michael Heaver 4. Edmond Rosenthal 4. Ash Haynes East of England Bannerman MEP 5. Paul Bishop 5. Michael Green 5. Andrew Smith 5. Rupert Smith 5. Marc Scheimann 4. John Flack 6. Naseem Ayub 6. Linda Jack 6. Mick McGough 6. Dennis Wiffen 6. Robert Lindsay 5. Tom Hunt 7. Chris Ostrowski 7. Hugh Annand 7. Andy Monk 7. Betty Wiffen 7. Fiona Radic 6. Margaret Simons 7. Jonathan Collett 1. Ashley Fox MEP 1. Clare Moody 1. Sir Graham Watson 1. William Dartmouth 1. David Smith 1. Molly Scott Cato 2. Julie Girling MEP 2. Glyn Ford MEP MEP 2. Helen Webster 2. Emily McIvor 3. James Cracknell 3. Ann Reeder 2. Kay Barnard 2. Julia Reid 3. Mike Camp 3. Ricky Knight 4. Georgina Butler 4. Hadleigh Roberts 3. Brian Mathew 3. Gawain Towler 4. Andrew Edwards 4. Audaye Elesady South West 5. Sophia Swire 5. Jude Robinson 4. Andrew Wigley 4. Tony McIntyre 5. Phil Dunn 5. -
Transnational Neo-Nazism in the Usa, United Kingdom and Australia
TRANSNATIONAL NEO-NAZISM IN THE USA, UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA PAUL JACKSON February 2020 JACKSON | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM About the Program on About the Author Extremism Dr Paul Jackson is a historian of twentieth century and contemporary history, and his main teaching The Program on Extremism at George and research interests focus on understanding the Washington University provides impact of radical and extreme ideologies on wider analysis on issues related to violent and societies. Dr. Jackson’s research currently focuses non-violent extremism. The Program on the dynamics of neo-Nazi, and other, extreme spearheads innovative and thoughtful right ideologies, in Britain and Europe in the post- academic inquiry, producing empirical war period. He is also interested in researching the work that strengthens extremism longer history of radical ideologies and cultures in research as a distinct field of study. The Britain too, especially those linked in some way to Program aims to develop pragmatic the extreme right. policy solutions that resonate with Dr. Jackson’s teaching engages with wider themes policymakers, civic leaders, and the related to the history of fascism, genocide, general public. totalitarian politics and revolutionary ideologies. Dr. Jackson teaches modules on the Holocaust, as well as the history of Communism and fascism. Dr. Jackson regularly writes for the magazine Searchlight on issues related to contemporary extreme right politics. He is a co-editor of the Wiley- Blackwell journal Religion Compass: Modern Ideologies and Faith. Dr. Jackson is also the Editor of the Bloomsbury book series A Modern History of Politics and Violence. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author, and not necessarily those of the Program on Extremism or the George Washington University. -
John Fordham
The BA Spaldinge Grammarn School Putblicatlion eian A review of the academic year 2018 to 2019 Student initiatives Musical performances Art winners Trips and expeditions Sporting accolades And the all new... ‘Head Hunt” Front page: Daniel Dorey-Rodriguez and Thomas McManamon Cookson SGS Prime Au revoir SGS does Minister elected Madame School of Rock by students Gamble Dedication John Fordham Contents 4 Welcome 11 Reviews and successes 35 Enrichment 47 Careers and Universities 53 Primary Liaison Headmaster 1972 - 1987 Alumni Passed away in March 2019, aged 87 years 59 “I was fortunate to work under the leadership of such a Looking forward remarkable and admirable headmaster.” 65 Mr David A Jones - Former colleague and existing staff member 2 The Bentleian The Bentleian 3 cannot believe it is that time of the year again Welcome to the Bentleian where we are introducing another edition of the elcome, once again, to another Summer 2019 Bentleian! jam-packed edition of the Head Hunt Bentleian. Jack and I were adamant that we would not make How good is the same error as last year and leave it too late - I first got involved with the however, this was not as easy as we hoped, given some of publication last year, putting to your eye? the highlights are towards the end of the academic year! the test my journalistic and editorial skills for the first I Hidden somewhere time. Last year’s edition was hugely successful and it was W in the Bentleian are 8 Once again, it has been a pleasure spending my days great to hear positive feedback, from staff and students laughing with Jack, and I wish him well as he starts the alike, after all the hard work Miss Grant and I had put in. -
R V Renshaw Sentencing Remarks
In the Central Criminal Court Regina v Jack Renshaw Sentencing Remarks of Mrs Justice McGowan 17 May 2019 1. As a child you became interested in, and then obsessed by, Nazi history and beliefs. You told a jury in an earlier trial the following facts about your background: That you had held extreme right-wing views since age 14. That you were convinced that there was an international Jewish conspiracy, which obsessed you. That you viewed the State as oppressing the white community, by encouraging non-whites to enter the country, a state of affairs which the Jews were encouraging. Nothing was more important than ending the Jewish control of this country That you hated Jewish people and they should all be dead. That was the subject of the speech you gave at the Yorkshire Forum when you called for the eradication of the Jews. You do not accept that the holocaust happened during the Second World War and agreed with the views set out in the “Multiculturalism is Genocide” poster A race war was inevitable and “we” had to be prepared to fight that war. 2. You have never grown out of that obsession. Your perverted view of history and current politics has caused you to believe it right to demonise groups, simply because they are different from you and, in furtherance of that obsession, you set out to plot to kill. 3. Having originally become involved in the British National Party you moved on to join National Action. That organisation had come to the attention of the authorities in 2013. -
Overview of the Far Right
Overview of the Far-Right Dr Benjamin Lee Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (CREST) Lancaster University, UK This work was funded by the Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (CREST). CREST is commissioned by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC Award: ES/N009614/1) with funding from the UK Intelligence Community. 1 Introduction This paper considers the ‘far-right’, an overarching term that includes a range of ideologies encompassing both the radical right (democratic) and extreme right (anti- democratic) (Ravndal & Bjørgo 2018). The defining characteristic of the far-right for this paper is: A narrative of racial and/or cultural threat to a ‘native’ group arising from perceived alien groups within a society. This is considered a working definition intended to bound this paper only, this should not be treated as comprehensive.1 This paper focuses on the far-right in the United Kingdom. However, far-right activism is transnational, and so it has not been possible to limit this research exclusively to the UK, nor can the UK far-right be considered in isolation from the wider far-right (Zúquete 2015). The far-right is not composed only of discrete and easily identifiable groups. While various organisations are components of the far-right, including gangs, protest movements, pressure groups, and political parties, the far-right as a whole is amorphous. Its messiness is inherent, stemming from a diverse range of ideologies and narratives enacted over a wide range of geographic contexts by multiple actors. Adding to this, digital technology has allowed an already complex patchwork of groups, influencers and activists to diffuse further through multiple and sometimes overlapping presences on an array of digital platforms. -
Commission for Countering Extremism National Action
Commission for Countering Extremism National Action: links between the far right, extremism and terrorism Summer 2019 Contact Details Dr Chris Allen [email protected] +44(0)7940 537691 +44(0)116 252 5911 The Centre for Hate Studies, Department of Criminology, University of Leicester, 154 Upper New Walk, Leicester LE1 7QA, UK “National Action: links between the far-right, extremism and terrorism” Dr Chris Allen - Centre for Hate Studies, Department of Criminology, University of Leicester, UK Commission for Countering Extremism Introduction In December 2016, National Action was proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000. Deemed to be concerned in terrorism1, it was a landmark decision: the first time in British history a far-right group had been proscribed. Accordingly, it became a criminal offence to be a member of National Action, invite support or help organise any meetings connected with it. Likewise, to wear clothing, carry symbols or display articles which suggest support. Since its proscription, the police have announced 28 arrests on suspicion of membership – four relating to members of the British armed forces – resulting in 11 successful convictions for membership alongside other offences, including three convictions for possessing information likely useful to a person preparing to commit an act of terrorism, and one conviction apiece for inciting racial hatred, distributing a terrorist publication, preparing an act of terrorism and making threats to kill a police office. At the time of writing, further trials are pending. Members of National Action (pre- and post-proscription) have additionally been arrested and convicted of other offences, including inciting racial hatred, possession, making explosives and conspiracy to commit violent disorder. -
Volume XII, Issue 6 December 2018 PERSPECTIVES on TERRORISM Volume 12, Issue 6
ISSN 2334-3745 Volume XII, Issue 6 December 2018 PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 12, Issue 6 Welcome from the Guest Editors This Special Issue on Terrorism from the Extreme Right has been guest-edited by Jacob Aasland Ravndal and Tore Bjørgo, both based at the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) at the University of Oslo. Last year, we invited a select group of scholars to submit original analyses of key developments in the field of right-wing extremism, violence and terrorism, with a special emphasis on contemporary actors, their modus operandi, and the conditions shaping them. All those who had submitted papers were also invited to a workshop at the University of Oslo on 15-16 February 2018 in order to discuss and revise their original manuscripts. A selection of these manuscripts was then submitted for external peer-review and eventually approved for publication in this Special Issue of Perspectives on Terrorism. Following the 9-11 attacks in 2001, extreme-right terrorism has received far less scholarly and political attention than Islamist terrorism. However, as several of the contributors to this Special Issue make clear, violence committed by extreme right perpetrators represents a very real threat, although it differs considerably from Jihadi terrorism in a number of ways. With a few notable exceptions, political violence from the extreme right tends, in many Western countries, to be more frequent than that from Salafist jihadists. At the same time, right-wing attacks usually result in fewer victims per attack than the ones emanating from jihadi terrorists. However, cumulatively, incidents of extreme right-wing violence add up to large numbers, as in Russia, where 459 people were killed in 406 deadly events between 2000-2017 (Enstad, in this issue). -
FAR RIGHT TERROR GOES GLOBAL MAGAZINE RELAUNCHED L More Pages L More Exclusives ESSENTIAL READING from the UK’S LEADING ANTI-FASCIST CAMPAIGN
STATE OF HATE 2020 FAR RIGHT TERROR GOES GLOBAL MAGAZINE RELAUNCHED l more pages l more exclusives ESSENTIAL READING FROM THE UK’S LEADING ANTI-FASCIST CAMPAIGN Providing a positive antidote Providing a positive antidote to hate and intolerance to hate and intolerance hopenothate.org.uk hopenothate.org.uk EXTREME WEATHER EXTREME DENIAL 2020: in search ofhope EXTREME POLITICS Price £7.00 Issue 41 – Winter 2019-20 Price £7.00 Issue 40 – Autumn 2019 SUBSCRIBE NOW hopenothate.org.uk/magazine £25 / year (quarterly) DON’T MISS YOUR COPY STATE OF HATE 2020 Editor: Nick Lowles Deputy editor: Nick Ryan Sub-editor: Jemma Levene Contributors: Rosie Carter Matthew Collins Gregory Davis Patrik Hermansson David Lawrence Joe Mulhall Simon Murdoch Liron Velleman HOPE not hate Ltd PO Box 61382 SUBSCRIBE NOW London N19 9EQ Registered office: Suite 1, 3rd Floor, 11-12 St. James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LB hopenothate.org.uk/magazine United Kingdom Tel.: +44 (207) 9521181 £25 / year (quarterly) www.hopenothate.org.uk @hope.n.hate @hopenothate HOPE not hate @hopenothate DON’T MISS YOUR COPY HOPE not hate | 3 STATE OF HATE 2020 CONTENTS SECTION 1 – OVERVIEW P6 SECTION 3 – TERRORISM P24 Livestreamed Terror 26 Terrorgram Network 30 2019 Far-Right Terrorists 34 A Case To Ban The O9A 35 Editorial: An Evolving Threat 6 Investigation: Order of Nine Angles 36 Executive Summary 8 Inside Iron March 42 Combat 18: Old School Threat 48 SECTION 2 – ESSAYS P10 C18 International 50 Worldwide Overview of Hate 12 C18’s Catalogue of Terror 54 European Map 16 Inspiring Nazi Terror -
Narratives of Hate the Spectrum of Far-Right Worldviews in the UK
Narratives of Hate The Spectrum of Far-right Worldviews in the UK SEPTEMBER 2019 Contents Foreword by Jacqui Smith 5 Executive Summary 7 Key findings Policy Recommendations 11 Define the relationship between violent and nonviolent extremism Tackle far-right hate Stop problematic groups and their narratives Chapter 1: The Growing Far Right in the UK 15 Chapter 2: Understanding the Ideology of the Far Right 19 Anders Breivik Selection of groups Methodology Chapter 3: Narrative Overlaps of Activist Groups 25 The West vs. Islam Victimisation Anti-establishment Justification of violence Conclusion 39 Appendix: Methodology 41 Limitations of this research References 45 3 Foreword by Jacqui Smith The relationship between violent and nonviolent extremism, and the delicate balance of freedom of speech and protection from hate-fuelled violence, have dogged governments since my time as Home Secretary 10 years ago. Arguments as we developed the Prevent strand of the counter-terrorism strategy were heartfelt across government. While some of us felt that the Islamist extremist narrative created a space for the development of violent action and radicalisation, others argued that tackling nonviolent extremism represented an encroachment on the principle of free speech. These arguments have continued in recent years and are exacerbated by the sheer difficulty of defining extremism at all. This is advanced-level policy making. But these are far from academic policy arguments to be left in the corridors of think tanks. As we know only too well in the Jo Cox Foundation, what starts as hate- fuelled rhetoric can end in the terrorist murder of a serving MP, wife and mother. -
Extremism and Terrorism
United Kingdom: Extremism and Terrorism On June 22, 2021, Europol, the European Union’s police agency, announced that 62 terrorist incidents were recorded in the United Kingdom in 2020, down from 64 in 2019. On June 10, 2021, the U.K. Home Office released figures that revealed more than one in ten terror suspects arrested in Britain is under the age of 18. Although the overall total of terror related arrests—166—is the lowest annual figure since 2011, arrests for older groups has decreased, whereas younger demographics have gone up. Of the suspects, white Brits are the largest ethnic group represented at 53 percent, whereas Asian Brits represent 30 percent, “other” represent 11 percent, and Black Brits represent around six percent of suspects. Neil Basu, the head of counterterrorism policing, alleges that the restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic has made it more difficult for teachers, social workers, and mental health services to spot the signs of radicalization among younger demographics. Additionally, given previous lockdown conditions, officers are seeing concerns of increasing numbers of children being drawn into extremism “come to fruition.” (Sources: Independent, Newsweek) On June 17, 2021, Sir John Saunders—the chair of a public inquiry to investigate the motivation behind the March 2017 Manchester Arena suicide bombing—published findings from the first of three phases of the inquiry into the attack. The inquiry, which was established on October 22, 2019, by U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel, was launched at the Manchester Magistrates’ Court on September 6, 2020 and is expected to last until spring 2021. -
The Banning of National Action in Britain by Graham Macklin
PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 12, Issue 6 ‘Only Bullets will Stop Us!’ – The Banning of National Action in Britain by Graham Macklin Abstract This article explores the banning of National Action (NA), a small, violent national-socialist group, which, in December 2016, became the first extreme right-wing group proscribed by a British government since 1940. It charts how NA evolved from public order irritant to its designation as a ‘terrorist’ group. Following a short overview of NA’s history and politics, and the circumstances in which the government banned it, the article assesses the ban’s impact upon its activists and milieu. Several subsequent trials have highlighted the ban’s success in dismantling NA as an organization. However, this case study also suggests that it has engendered a period of ideological and organisational adaption as former activists sought out new modes and methods of activism to enable them to circumvent the ban, highlighting the tactical flexibility of extreme right militancy. In line with the wider literature, this case study finds that although the ban succeeded in deterring some activists, others remained defiant, continuing to operate clandestinely until the police disrupted their activities. The article concludes with a discussion of where the ban has been less successful, highlighting the protracted difficulties faced by the authorities in eradicating NA’s digital footprint - one of the aims of banning the group in the first place, since the tools to do so lie with social media conglomerates and are thus