Masters Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Masters Thesis A Manifesto of Impossibilities? Workers, Politics, and the History of the Luxembourg Commission, February-May 1848 by Jason Thomas Hewer A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Auburn, Alabama August 3, 2019 Keywords: Louis Blanc, Luxembourg Commission, 1848 Revolution Copyright 2019 by Jason Thomas Hewer Approved by Ralph Kingston, Chair, Associate Professor of History Rupali Mishra, Associate Professor of History Christopher Ferguson, Associate Professor History Abstract The Luxembourg Commission was the response of the provisional government of France during the Revolution of 1848 to demands by workers of Paris that the government do something to help alleviate the harsh conditions under which they labored. The Commission was a step short of the full government ministry of progress that many workers called for. However, during the few months it existed, the Luxembourg Commission gave impetus to grassroots workers’ organization and successfully began to act as an arbitrator in disputes between workers and bosses. The elections of April 1848 were disastrous for worker candidates, and the Commission itself winked out of existence in May. Workers’ frustration led to them storming the National Assembly and successfully suspending it on May 15. An analysis of May 15 shows how volatile the allegiances of the National and Mobile Guards were on the day. Both the Luxembourg Commission and the journée of May 15 were sidelined in histories of the Revolution written during the nineteenth century because these items did not support the political narrative of the authors of these histories. This thesis will make the case for the re-inclusion of the Luxembourg Commission as an important topic of study in the history of 1848 as a social revolution. ii Acknowledgments Although there are many people who deserve thanks for helping me on my way as I have worked on this thesis, three individuals stand out beyond the rest. First, I would like to thank my father and mother. They have been a constant source of encouragement. From the bright-eyed moment I mentioned that I would like to pursue a graduate degree, to the times when I found myself questioning that decision, their support has been invaluable. Second, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Ralph Kingston. His guidance has made it possible for me to make this journey. I could not have asked for a better mentor or friend. iii Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................ iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: The Force Awakens: The Luxembourg Commission, 1848, and the Promise of Association ................................................................................................................................ 10 Chapter 2: Rebels: The April Elections to the Journée of May 15 ............................................. 33 Chapter 3: The Phantom Menace: Historians of 1848 and their Legacy .................................. 69 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 89 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................. 93 iv Introduction On April 12, 1848, the moderate journal L’Atelier published an article criticizing the list of candidates proposed by the Luxembourg Commission for election to the National Assembly. The Commission only included four members of the provisional government on their list. “It would be a sad inspiration for the delegates to exclude seven members of the Provisional Government from their list; propriety, if not gratitude, commands that they should not be excluded.”1 L’Atelier was not in support of the candidates the Luxembourg Commission had selected and thought the more moderate members of the Provisional Government would have been a better choice. On 16 April, the more radical Le Représentant du Peuple responded to this critique with a sarcastic critique of L’Atelier. “Exquisite good tone and propriety! O Journalists with kid gloves, workmen of good manners, it is time, in truth,- high time for the safety of the Republic,- to give lessons of good behavior and propriety to those workers who are frank enough to call things by their names.”2 Le Représentant du Peuple did not share L’Atelier’s opinion. L’Atelier then suggested that Louis Blanc, a member of the provisional government helped craft this list and the exclusion of certain members of the government from the Luxembourg’s candidate list evidenced division within the government. Le Représentant du Peuple again rose to the defense of the Luxembourg Commission, “Have you not heard… that this slander, which 1 L’Atelier: Organe spécial de la classe laborieuse, April 12, 1848. 2 Le Représentant du Peuple: Journal des Travailleurs, April 16, 1848. 1 the Constitutionnel [a conservative journal] had recently brought against the citizen Louis Blanc, provoked a formal denial on the part of the delegates [of the Luxembourg Commission]?... Editors of L’Atelier, you are very perfidious.”3 The early days of the Second Republic in France were full of such to and fros, debating how and to what extent workers had the right to represent themselves and what giving power to workers would mean for the establishment of government. When L’Atelier proposed its own list of candidates for the National Assembly, which only included five workers, three of whom were employed by L’Atelier, and several clergymen, the Représentant du Peuple submitted its own stinging criticism of the candidate list, “Enough abbots! Don’t you know the proverb: The company you keep... Hush! The propriety!”4 Despite, or perhaps, due to the divided opinion of the journals, Louis Blanc and the Luxembourg Commission were topics of great interest from February through May of 1848. The Luxembourg Commission was the provisional government’s response to demands made by the workers of Paris that the government do something to help alleviate the harsh conditions under which they labored. Louis Blanc stood as a symbol of socialism and his Luxembourg Commission represented a tangible shift in government policy that many hoped could lead to the realization of a social republic. The Commission for its part took an active role in the political process through its proposed candidate list in the April elections. Blanc’s Commission was not just at the center of the political discussion of the day, however. Set up as a congress where delegates from each profession could be represented, it investigated issues relevant to workers and proposed practical solutions. Although the power of legislation remained with the provisional government, and the Commission was a step short of the full government ministry of 3 Le Représentant Du Peuple, April 16, 1848. 4 Le Représentant Du Peuple, April 16, 1848. 2 progress that many workers called for, the Luxembourg Commission took the initiative to act as arbitrator in a number of disputes between workers and their bosses during the few months it existed. As the spat between L’Atelier and Le Répresentant du Peuple illustrates, there was significant difference between the political loyalties of various newspapers. Newspapers make up a significant source base for this thesis. They provide important insight into the day to day happenings of the Revolution of 1848 and allow us to see powerfully worded arguments from many sides of the political spectrum. Newspapers at this time – with the exception of La Presse and Le Siècle who adopted an alternative business model, concentrating on selling advertisements rather than subscriptions – were “journaux d’opinion,” each with a particular political allegiance. They made no show of neutrality or attempt to be unbiased in their reporting of the news (and historians have largely dismissed the truth of La Presse and Le Siècle’s claims to be depoliticized).5 Journalists and newspaper editors, moreover, were active participants in the events of the Revolution. In using these sources, I have therefore determined not only their politics, but also, where possible, who wrote for and edited each paper. Le Constitutionnel, edited by Louis Véron was an important liberal newspaper. The paper supported the Orleanist regime before the revolution and backed the more conservative members of the government during the revolution. Thus it was well-established by 1848 and provide extensive coverage of the events of the revolution. Le Siècle, La Patrie and the Journal des Débats, like Le Constitutionnel, were supporters of the liberal republican government majority. The latter two provided less coverage of the Luxembourg Commission. 5 Richard Terdiman, Discourse / Counter-Discourse: The Theory and Practice of Symbolic Resistance in Nineteenth-Century France (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1985), 127-32. 3 Le Répresentant du Peuple, edited by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, appealed to a more radical readership. This paper was unashamedly socialist and provides important insight into the political left. The papers of the left themselves differed significantly
Recommended publications
  • June 1962 Acknowledgments
    A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF FIVE POEMS BY ALFRED DE VIGNY "MOISE," "LA MAISON DU BERGER," "LA COLERE DE SAMSON," "LE MONT DES OLIVIERS," AND "LA MORT DU LOUP" A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ATLANTA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY ELAINE JOY C. RUSSELL DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH ATLANTA, GEORGIA JUNE 1962 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the preparation of this thesis I have received generous as sistance from many persons, and it is my wish to acknowledge their kind efforts. I am indebted to Doctor Benjamin F. Hudson, Chairman, Department of French, Atlanta University, to Mrs. Jacqueline Brimmer, Professor, Morehouse College, and to Mrs. Billie Geter Thomas, Head, Modern Language Department, Spelman College, for their kind and help ful suggestions. In addition to my professors, I wish to thank the Library staff, especially Mrs. Annabelle M. Jarrett, for all the kind assistance which I have received from them. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ±± Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ! II. THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROMANTIC THEMES 5 III. THE FUNCTION OF THE POET 21 IV. THE PHILOSOPHY OF ALFRED DE VIGNI AS REVEALED IN: "LA MAISON DU BERGER, •' AND "LA COLERE DE SAMSON" 30 V. THE PHILOSOPHY OF ALFRED DE VIGNY AS REVEALED IN: »LE MONT DES OLIVIERS,» AND "LA. MORT DU LOUP" £2 Conclusion 5j^ BIBLIOGRAPHY 57 iii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Each literaiy movement develops its favorite themes. Love, death, religion, nature and nationalism became the great themes of the romantic period. The treatment of these themes by the precursors of romanticism was later interpreted and developed by the major romantic poets, Alphonse de Lamartine, Victor Hugo, Alfred de Musset and Alfred de Vigny.
    [Show full text]
  • Students Will Develop an Understanding of the Major Ideas
    SUNY Cortland Department of International Communications and Culture FRE 417/515 Romanticism & Realism Fall 2009 Bob Ponterio 3 cr. hrs Tel: 2027 home: 756-4813 M 4:20-6:50 Office: Main 223 Main 229 Office hrs: MT 9-12, & by appointment [email protected] Textes : We will use electronic texts for shorter works. Each student will also be choosing one novel to read that can either be borrowed from the library or bought online at Amazon.com: Resources utiles: Pour acheter des livres en français: http://www.alapage.fr ; http://www.amazon.fr ; http://www.archambault.ca/ ; http://www.amazon.ca Free online versions : http://gallica.bnf.fr/classique/ Styles de peinture: http://discipline.free.fr/lesstyles.htm Course Description: We will explore how changing ideas about the nature of the world and of mankind led to two major approaches to writing literature in the 19th century: Romanticism & Realism. An examination of a number of major works of poetry, drama, and prose will help us how these two different but related concepts evolved and continue to influence us today. Open to graduate and upper level undergraduate students. For upper level undergraduates who have already completed all major requirements, this course can count for SUNY Cortland’s graduate program. Évaluation: Presentations 20% (3 short in-class presentations) Papers 40% (3 : 5-page papers; 1st draft will be revised) HW 10% (short written) Final Exam 30% Objectives: Students will develop an understanding of the major ideas underpinning the romantic & realist movements and be able to recognize and explain the elements of various types of romanticism & realism in the works that they read.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrialization and Social Radicalism: British and French
    Industrialization and Social Radicalism: British and French Workers' Movements and the Mid- Nineteenth-Century Crises Author(s): Craig Calhoun Source: Theory and Society, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Jul., 1983), pp. 485-504 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/657386 . Accessed: 23/10/2013 06:35 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Theory and Society. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.12.11.80 on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:35:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 485 INDUSTRIALIZATION AND SOCIAL RADICALISM British and French Workers' Movements and the Mid-Nineteenth-Century Crises CRAIGCALHOUN Radicalism and Industrialization Since France's revolution of 1848 and the British Chartist movement, nu- merous writers have linked the progress of industrializationto radical poli- tics. Marx, like some other contemporaries, tended to draw examples of political radicalism and socialism from the French Second Republic, and a model of capitalist industrialization from Britain. This was misleading, for the more industrial country was the less radical. The confusion did not necessarilyoriginate with Marx or other radicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Students in England and France, 1815-1858
    FLORENT PALLUAULT D.E.A., archiviste paléographe MEDICAL STUDENTS IN ENGLAND AND FRANCE 1815-1858 A COMPARATIVE STUDY University of Oxford Faculty of Modern History - History of Science Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy Trinity 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the first instance, my most sincere gratitude goes to Dr Ruth Harris and Dr Margaret Pelling who have supervised this thesis. Despite my slow progress, they have supported my efforts and believed in my capacities to carry out this comparative study. I hope that, despite its defects, it will prove worthy of their trust. I would like to thank Louella Vaughan for providing an interesting eighteenth-century perspective on English medical education, sharing her ideas on my subject and removing some of my misconceptions. Similarly, I thank Christelle Rabier for her support and for our discussions regarding her forthcoming thesis on surgery in England and France. My thanks naturally go to the staff of the various establishments in which my research has taken me, and particularly to the librarians at the Wellcome Library for the History and Understanding of Medicine in London, the librarians in the History of Science Room at the Bibliothèque nationale de France in Paris, and to Bernadette Molitor and Henry Ferreira-Lopes at the Bibliothèque Inter-Universitaire de Médecine in Paris. I am grateful to Patricia Gillet from the Association d’entraide des Anciens élèves de l’École des Chartes for the financial support that the Association has given me and to Wes Cordeau at Texas Supreme Mortgage, Inc. for the scholarship that his company awarded me.
    [Show full text]
  • “Tutorial for Graduating Majors” French 3500
    “TUTORIAL FOR GRADUATING MAJORS” FRENCH 3500 This course prepares majors for the completion of their requirements in the B.A. in French. through advising by a designated professor. The course concludes with the Written Exit Exam, a 2-hour long comprehensive exam written in French. 1 credit. Pass/Fail. The exam is made up of 3 parts: 1) Literature (40 minutes);2) Culture/Civilization (40 minutes); 3) Advanced Grammar/Phonetics (40 minutes). In literature and in civilization, the candidate receives 10 topics, to choose 6 of them, and to write a paragraph for each. In Advanced Grammar/Phonetics some choices also occur, according to specific instructions. Approximately one month prior to the Written Exit Exam (scheduled during final exams week), an oral mid-term exam occurs. Both the mid-term and the final exams are based on “The Topics Lists” (see attached), and the guidance given by the “designated professor”. A jury made up of three professors examines the candidate in both cases. If the candidate fails one of the 3 parts of the written exam, that part may be retaken within 7- 10 days of the initial exam in the same semester. Three parts: 1. French Literature a. Middle Ages to the Revolution b. 19th and 20th Centuries 2. French Civilization a. Through the 18th Century b. The 19th – 21st Centuries 3. French Language a. Advanced Grammar b. Phonetics Part 1a: French Literature Through the 18th Century Authors Chrétien de Troyes Marie de France Villon Charles d’Orléans Rabelais Clément Marot Montaigne Pétrarque Du Bellay Corneille Racine Molière Diderot André Chénier Works, Movements, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • French Romantic Socialism and the Critique of Liberal Slave Emancipation Naomi J
    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons History College of Arts & Sciences 9-2013 Breaking the Ties: French Romantic Socialism and the Critique of Liberal Slave Emancipation Naomi J. Andrews Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/history Part of the European History Commons, and the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Andrews, Naomi J. (2013). Breaking the Ties: French Romantic Socialism and the Critique of Liberal Slave Emancipation. The ourJ nal of Modern History, Vol. 85, No. 3 (September 2013) , pp. 489-527. Published by: The nivU ersity of Chicago Press. Article DOI: 10.1086/668500. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668500 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Breaking the Ties: French Romantic Socialism and the Critique of Liberal Slave Emancipation* Naomi J. Andrews Santa Clara University What we especially call slavery is only the culminating and pivotal point where all of the suffering of society comes together. (Charles Dain, 1836) The principle of abolition is incontestable, but its application is difficult. (Louis Blanc, 1840) In 1846, the romantic socialist Désiré Laverdant observed that although Great Britain had rightly broken the ties binding masters and slaves, “in delivering the slave from the yoke, it has thrown him, poor brute, into isolation and abandonment. Liberal Europe thinks it has finished its work because it has divided everyone.”1 Freeing the slaves, he thus suggested, was only the beginning of emancipation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proffered Pen: Saint-Simonianism and the Public Sphere
    THE PROFFERED PEN: SAINT-SIMONIANISM AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE IN 19TH CENTURY FRANCE by MICHAEL BRICK A THESIS Presented to the Department of History and the Graduate School at the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts March 2011 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Michael Brick Title: The Proffered Pen: Saint-Simonianism and the Public Sphere in 19th Century France This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Department of History by: Dr. George Sheridan Chair Dr. David Luebke Member Dr. Daniel Pope Member and Richard Linton Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School Degree awarded March 2011 ii © 2011 Michael Brick iii THESIS ABSTRACT Michael Brick Master of Arts Department of History March 2011 Title: The Proffered Pen: Saint-Simonianism and the Public Sphere in 19th Century France Approved: ________________________________________________ Dr. David Luebke The French ―utopian socialist‖ movement known as Saint-Simonianism has long been recognized for its influence among 19th century engineers. An examination of the early Saint-Simonian journal, Le Producteur, however, reveals the articulation of an appeal to contemporary men of letters. A survey of the life and career of Hippolyte Carnot, a prominent Saint-Simonian man of letters, confirms and illustrates the nature of this appeal as it developed alongside Saint-Simonian ideology. Central to this appeal was the Saint-Simonians‘ attributing to the ―artist‖ the role of moral educator.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Heritage of Modern Socialist Ideas
    Section XVI: Developments in Socialism, Contemporary Civilization (Ideas and Institutions 1848-1914 of Western Man) 1958 1. The eH ritage of Modern Socialist Ideas Robert L. Bloom Gettysburg College Basil L. Crapster Gettysburg College Harold L. Dunkelberger Gettysburg College See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/contemporary_sec16 Part of the Models and Methods Commons, and the Sociology Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Bloom, Robert L. et al. "1. The eH ritage of Modern Socialist Ideas. Pt. XVI: Developments in Socialism, (1848-1914)." Ideas and Institutions of Western Man (Gettysburg College, 1958), 2-6. This is the publisher's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ contemporary_sec16/2 This open access book chapter is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1. The eH ritage of Modern Socialist Ideas Abstract Of the total heritage which gave birth to modern socialism, brief attention may be given to certain of the predecessors of Karl Marx. Although some now are saved from obscurity only by the diligence of interested historians, others generated powerful ideas still not extinguished today. Together they created an amorphous body of thought from which Marx freelv drew. Consequently, an understanding of the varieties of later socialism, and specifically of Marx, requires a brief survey of these men.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionnaire Du Compagnonnage Du Même Auteur
    DICTIONNAIRE DU COMPAGNONNAGE DU MÊME AUTEUR : - Carcassonne La Palme des Beaux Arts, ou le Tour de France d'un Compagnon Menuisier au XIX siècle, C.N.D.P., 1979. (épuisé) - Compagnonnages d'hier et d'aujourd'hui, C.N.D.P., 1980. (épuisé) - Sur le chemin des Compagnons, éditions de Poliphile, 1984. (épuisé) - « Le Compagnonnage aujourd'hui », chapitre historique in Revue La France, 1986. — Le Tour de France de Jean Bellegarde, Compagnon Charpentier du Devoir (Dessins de Mor), éditons Belisane, 1988. (épuisé) – Agricol Perdiguier dit Avignonnais la Vertu, Compagnon Menuisier du Devoir de Liberté (Dessins de Mor), éditions Bélisane), 1989. (épuisé) - Le Compagnonnage, Jacques Grancher Editeur (Collection Ouverture), 1989. — Voyages dans le Compagnonnage, éditions de Mortagne, 1991. • Couverture : Le Siège de Rhodes (voir notice du Dictionnaire). • Les lettrines sont issues de la Divine Proportion de Fra Luca Pacioli di Boryo San Sepolcro, rééditée par La Librairie du Compagnonnage, Paris, 1980. • Les treize illustrations de cet ouvrage sont de Jules Noël, elles parurent pour la première fois dans L'Illustration en novembre 1945. DICTIONNAIRE DU COMPAGNONNAGE François ICHER Editions du BORRÉGO Si vous désirez être tenu régulièrement au courant de nos parutions, il vous suffit d'envoyer vos nom et adresse aux Editions du Borrégo, BP 37 - 72001 Le Mans cédex. © Editions du Borrégo - 72001 Le Mans, 1992. ISBN : 2-904724-16-8 A Marie et Guillaume Pourquoi un dictionnaire du compagnonnage Un dictionnaire est un recueil de mots d'une langue, rangés dans un ordre en général alphabétique et suivis de leurs défi- nitions. Une encyclopédie est un ouvrage abritant un choix de mots, ce choix se rapportant à un secteur particulier du savoir humain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Socialist Reformism in France*
    CARL LANDAUER THE ORIGIN OF SOCIALIST REFORMISM IN FRANCE* PRELUDE: THE OPPOSITION TO MARX IN THE INTERNATIONAL Although the International Workingmen's Association is often called the Marxian International, it was at no time safely under the control of Karl Marx. The spirit of Marx, however, was the strongest single influence in the organization from its beginning, and from 1868, when the Proudhonians had suffered defeat at the Brussels Congress, to 1872, when Bakunin's opposition proved too strong to be overcome, Marx possessed more power in the organization than anyone else. Yet this power collapsed in 1872: Although formally Marx was the victor at the Hague Congress, actually in the conflict with Bakunin it became evident that Marx's position was disintegrating. What were the reasons? "Marx accused his opponent of the intention to introduce into the Association ideological disorder, the spirit of [political] abstentionism and of federalism, in the Utopian desire to create a communal organi- zation without government. Bakunin, in his turn, criticized Marx for wanting to impose on the International a unified dogma and a party discipline in order to create a regime of authoritarian communism first in the Association and then in the state (dans les gouvernements)."1 Unfortunately for Marx and for the unity of the workers' movement, many members of the International who by no means believed in a "communal organization without a government" and perhaps were not * The author wishes to express his gratitude to the Institute of International Studies at the University of California at Berkeley for financial support in meeting expenses incurred in the collection of material; also to Monsieur Couta- rel, librarian of the Prefecture de police in Paris, for permission to use the files of the Prefecture; and to the staff of the Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis in Amsterdam, especially to Mr T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolution of 1848 in the History of French Republicanism Samuel Hayat
    The Revolution of 1848 in the History of French Republicanism Samuel Hayat To cite this version: Samuel Hayat. The Revolution of 1848 in the History of French Republicanism. History of Political Thought, Imprint Academic, 2015, 36 (2), pp.331-353. halshs-02068260 HAL Id: halshs-02068260 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02068260 Submitted on 14 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. History of Political Thought, vol. 36, n° 2, p. 331-353 PREPRINT. FINAL VERSION AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/hpt/2015/00000036/00000002/art00006 The Revolution of 1848 in the History of French Republicanism Samuel Hayat Abstract: The revolution of February 1848 was a major landmark in the history of republicanism in France. During the July monarchy, republicans were in favour of both universal suffrage and direct popular participation. But during the first months of the new republican regime, these principles collided, putting republicans to the test, bringing forth two conceptions of republicanism – moderate and democratic-social. After the failure of the June insurrection, the former prevailed. During the drafting of the Constitution, moderate republicanism was defined in opposition to socialism and unchecked popular participation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failure of a Revolution France, Germany and the Netherlands in 1848: a Comparative Analysis
    The Failure of a Revolution France, Germany and The Netherlands in 1848: A Comparative Analysis Willem Cleven MA Comparative History Utrecht University Spring 2008 Supervised by dr. I. de Haan Image on front page: Horace Vernet – Barricade at Rue Soufflot, Paris 1848. 2 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction……………………………………………..……………………..1 Chapter 2. The Comparative Method………………………………………………….10 2.1 Units of Historical Study 2.2 What is a Revolution? 2.3 Outline Chapter 3. The Events of the Revolutions...…………………………………………..20 3.1 Spring 1848: Revolution 3.2 Confrontation Chapter 4. Why the Revolution Failed…………………………………………………32 4.1 Internal Coherence of the Revolutionary Faction 4.2 Internal Coherence of the Incumbent Faction 4.3 Control over Sources of Power 4.4 External Intervention Chapter 5. Conclusion: A Theory of Failed Revolutions?...…………………………48 Bibliography 3 Chapter 1. Introduction “The tricolor republic now bears only one color, the color of the defeated, the color of blood.” 1 Karl Marx after the June Days uprising (Neue Rheinische Zeitung, 29 June 1848) As I am writing this opening paragraph, it is 160 years ago to the day that the French National Guard ended a bloody uprising among the Parisian workers. Sometimes labeled a ‘class war’2, the so-called ‘June Days’ uprising posited the urban working class against the Provisional Government of the French Second Republic. It shall become clear in the following chapters that this clash between the revolutionary regime and the masses which had been vital in its victory four months prior, ultimately represented the failure of that revolution, a revolution which made an end to the French monarchy, instated universal male suffrage for a short time and set off a wave of revolutions across the continent.
    [Show full text]