240 YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE NATION 2020 AND THE WORLD
PROJECTS, PUBLICATIONS & MEETINGS OF THE ACADEMY American Institutions, Society, and the Public Good Education and the Development of Knowledge Global Security and International Affairs The Humanities, Arts, and Culture Science, Engineering, and Technology With Appreciation . . .
Academy projects, publications, and meetings are supported by gifts and grants from members, friends, foundations, corporations, Affiliates, and other funding agencies. The Academy expresses its deep appreciation for this support and to the many members who contribute to its work.
Published by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, September 2020 CONTENTS
3 5 4 11 71 12 13 41 18 72 27 22 25 52 33 24 29 28 56 70 20 44 49 64 48 50 68 40
Overview Commission on the Arts The Humanities Indicators Overview of Science The Public Face Challenges for International ScientificPartnerships Science and Technology Models for U.S. New Climate Change Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education of Undergraduate Commission on the Future Overview Phase One Nuclear Age, Meeting the Challenges of the New Phase Two: Nuclear Age, Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear States and New Deterrence Dialogue on Arms ControlPromoting and Disarmament International Responses and Violence, Civil Wars, Conflict to Violent the Humanitarian Health Response Rethinking Overview Commission Democratic Citizenship on the Practice of Making Justice Accessible Overview Member Events AffiliatesAcademy of the American Exploratory Initiatives CommitteesLocal Program and Representatives Science, Engineering, and Technology The Humanities, Arts, and Culture The Humanities, Education and the Development of Knowledge the Development Education and Global Security and International Affairs American Institutions, Society, and the Public Good Society, American Institutions, CONTENTS of Directors the Chair of the Board From Leadership Academy of a Patron Portrait & Its Future The Academy Projects, Publications, and Meetings Publications, Projects, the President From
FROM THE PRESIDENT FROM THE PRESIDENT
From its founding in 1780, the mission of the Amer- ican Academy of Arts and Sciences has been to ex- amine the most complex issues of the day through the extraordinary and interdisciplinary strength of its membership. Ever since, the Academy has con- tributed critical insights into the moments that have defined our nation’s history, such as the post–World War II recovery and the creation of the field of arms control during the Cold War. However, there have been other times when our voices have been silent. There is, for example, no record in the Academy’s work of the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic and very lit- tle in relation to the civil rights movement. These, I believe, would have been instructive research and learning references in light of the profound events of this year. It is, therefore, with gratitude that I submit this report on our projects, publica- tions, and programs from the past year. Our members are lending their voices to today’s deeply challenging issues, from the importance of the arts in free expres- sion, education, and civic engagement, to negotiating the complexities of new nu- clear states, to protecting those who serve on the front lines of violence and con- flict, to shining a light on the inequities of our criminal justice system, to strength- ening the practice of democratic citizenship. New and emerging projects will help promote environmental sustainability, understand the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, and examine the underpinnings of growing disparities in wealth and opportunity in our country. The work described herein is made possible thanks to the philanthropy of our members. I am deeply grateful for such support that enables the Academy to el- evate the use of evidence and knowledge, foster civil discourse, and advance the common good. I look forward to our continued work together in pursuit of these goals. David W. Oxtoby American Institutions, Society, and the Public Good
ince its founding, projects of the Amer- ican Academy of Arts and Sciences that S work to bolster American citizens’ un- derstanding of and engagement with the in- stitutions of their government have been a hallmark of the Academy’s work. Our charter states that the “end and design” of the Ameri- can Academy is to “cultivate every art and sci- ence which may tend to advance the interest, honor, dignity, and happiness of a free, inde- pendent, and virtuous people.” Today this ef- fort involves projects designed to advance the state of scholarship about the nation’s insti- tutions and to develop innovative solutions to problems facing American society in the twenty-first century. Projects in this area in- terpret the term “institution” broadly, focus- ing on all of the constituent elements of gov- ernment and civil society. These projects ad- dress how individual citizens interact with social structures, how these experiences pre- pare people to make a positive contribution to a diverse America, and how these institu- tions are evolving. The Academy shares this research through publications, convenings, and active outreach.
4 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS, SOCIETY, AND THE PUBLIC GOOD American Institutions, Society, and the Public Good PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE
CHAIR MEMBERS Lee Epstein William Poorvu Washington University Harvard Business School Frances McCall Danielle Allen in St. Louis Rosenbluth Harvard University Kenneth Prewitt Yale University Susan Hanson Columbia University Thomas Bender Clark University New York University James M. Stone Antonia Hernández Plymouth Rock Companies Alan M. Dachs California Community Fremont Group Foundation
PROJECT Commission on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship
The Commission on the Practice of Democratic Citizen- empower everyday citizens. The project uses a definition of ship is a multiyear project of the American Academy of “citizenship” that extends beyond simple legal status to in- Arts and Sciences. The Commission focuses on the im- clude people who are “civic participants” in many domains pact of political institutions, civic culture, and civil soci- within their communities. ety on individual practice in contemporary democracy in the United States. The work of the Commission explores The project seeks to increase democratic engagement in the factors that encourage and discourage people from be- the United States with recommendations that will help coming engaged in their communities; sheds light on the empower voters, increase political and civic participation, mechanisms that help people connect across demograph- and revitalize our civic culture. Our Common Purpose: Rein- ic and ideological boundaries; examines how the transfor- venting American Democracy for the 21st Century, the Commis- mations in our media environment have altered what civ- sion’s final report and recommendations, was released in ic engagement looks like in many communities; and makes June 2020 and included a call to have significant progress recommendations that will encourage participation and on all of its recommendations by 2026.
COMMISSION CHAIRS Caroline Brettell Lisa García Bedolla Wallace Jefferson Southern Methodist University of California, Alexander Dubose & Danielle Allen University Berkeley Jefferson, LLP Harvard University David Brooks Sam Gill Joseph Kahne Stephen Heintz The New York Times John S. and James L. Knight University of California, Rockefeller Brothers Fund Foundation Riverside David Campbell Eric Liu University of Notre Dame Marie Griffith Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg Citizen University Washington University Tufts University Alan Dachs in Saint Louis Fremont Group Yuval Levin COMMISSION MEMBERS Hahrie Han National Affairs Dee Davis Johns Hopkins University Sayu Bhojwani Center for Rural Strategies Carolyn Lukensmeyer The New American Leaders Antonia Hernández National Institute for Project Jonathan F. Fanton California Community Civil Discourse President Emeritus, American Foundation danah boyd Academy of Arts and Sciences Martha McCoy Data & Society Everyday Democracy
5 CONTINUED Commission on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship
Lynn Nottage Miles Rapoport Ben Vinson PROJECT STAFF Playwright Harvard University Case Western Reserve University Paul Erickson Steven Olikara Michael Schudson Gabriela Farrell Millennial Action Project Columbia University Diane Wood U.S. Court of Appeals, Katherine Gagen Norman Ornstein Sterling Speirn Seventh Circuit Darshan Goux American Enterprise Institute National Conference on Citizenship Judy Woodruff Tania Munz Bob Peck PBS FPR Partners Marcelo Suárez-Orozco University of Massachusetts Ethan Zuckerman FUNDERS Pete Peterson Boston; formerly, University Massachusetts Institute Pepperdine University of California, Los Angeles of Technology S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation Rockefeller Brothers Foundation Alan and Lauren Dachs
PROJECT PUBLICATIONS
The Internet and Engaged Citizenship The Political and Civic Engagement of Immigrants David Karpf (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Caroline Brettell (American Academy of Arts and 2019) Sciences, 2020)
The Data Driving Democracy Our Common Purpose: Reinventing American Christina Couch (American Academy of Arts and Democracy for the 21st Century Sciences, 2020) (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2020)
6 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS, SOCIETY, AND THE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECT MEETINGS
Meeting of the Commission
September 16–17, 2019 Cedarbrook Lodge Seattle, WA
The fourth meeting of the full Commission on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship focused on finalizing the Com- mission’s findings and recommendations. The members of the Commission reviewed six strategies and thirty-one tactical recommendations and agreed by unanimous con- sent to endorse the final report.
MEETING CHAIRS
Danielle Allen Eric Liu Harvard University Citizen University
Stephen Heintz Rockefeller Brothers Fund
LEFT: Commission members at the September 16, 2019, meeting. From front to back: Martha McCoy, Marie Griffith, Lisa García Bedolla, Joseph Kahne, David Campbell, and Ben Vinson.
BELOW: Commission members and Academy President David Oxtoby at the Commission’s September 16, 2019, meeting.
7 Convening on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship
February 7, 2020 The House of the Academy Cambridge, MA
A cornerstone of the work of the Commission on the Prac- as well as Commission members, civic leaders, and philan- tice of Democratic Citizenship has been listening to the thropists, to hear from one another and share their voices of American citizens. On February 7, 2020, the work through a series of panels, breakout sessions, and Commission brought together more than seventy partici- presentations. pants from nearly all of its forty-seven listening sessions,
PANEL 1: The Commission PANEL 2: Inspire a Culture of PANEL 3: Dramatically PANEL 4: Empower Voters on the Practice of Commitment to American Expand Civic Bridging Democratic Citizenship Democracy and One Capacity PANEL CHAIR Another PANEL CHAIR PANEL CHAIR Danielle Allen PANEL CHAIR Harvard University David Oxtoby Stephen Heintz American Academy of Eric Liu Rockefeller Brothers Fund Arts and Sciences Citizen University PARTICIPANTS
PARTICIPANTS Habon Abdulle PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS Women Organizing Women Kim Covington Network Danielle Allen Serene Jones Arizona Community Harvard University Union Theological Seminary Foundation Trey Grayson former Secretary of State, Stephen Heintz Mina Layba Vanessa Grossl Kentucky Rockefeller Brothers Fund City Manager’s Office, BGCF365 City of Thousand Oaks Julio Medina Eric Liu Howard Parr Exodus Transitional Citizen University Cameron Patterson Akron Civic Theater Community Moton Museum Jon Pritchett John Wood Jr. Mississippi Center for Better Angels Public Policy
Angela Cutbill (left; from Calabasas, CA) and Richard Young (right; from Lexington, KY) participate in the “Convening on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship.”
8 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS, SOCIETY, AND THE PUBLIC GOOD
TOP: From left to right: Academy President David Oxtoby and Commission Cochairs Stephen Heintz, Danielle Allen, and Eric Liu discuss the Commission’s work during the convening held at the House of the Academy on February 7, 2020.
RIGHT: Bradley Christian-Sallis (from Lincoln, NE) describes the work of his organization, Civic Nebraska, to increase civic participation and community engagement.
BELOW: Participants at the “Convening on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship” held at the House of the Academy on February 7, 2020, discussed how to create an information environment that serves the public good for the twenty-first century.
9 Emergency Meeting of the Commission
March 27, 2020 Virtual Meeting
The full Commission on the Practice of Democratic Citi- recommendations to reflect the effect of emergencies on zenship met via web conference to discuss the impact of the voter access to the polls. The Commission agreed the pan- COVID-19 pandemic on the content of the final report and demic amplified the challenges and obstacles they sought the plans for its release. Commission members agreed to to address in their work and therefore to release the report modify the report slightly to account for the impact of the as planned in June. pandemic on the nation and to revise one of the thirty-one
MEETING CHAIRS
Danielle Allen Stephen Heintz Eric Liu Harvard University Rockefeller Brothers Fund Citizen University
Release Event: Our Common Purpose: Reinventing American Democracy for the 21st Century
June 11, 2020 Virtual Event
Our Common Purpose: Reinventing American Democracy for the six strategies and thirty-one recommendations, and com- 21st Century, the final report of the Commission on the Prac- ments by Commission members and featured speakers. tice of Democratic Citizenship, was released via an online The audience included members of the Academy, imple- webinar. The one-hour event included a video presenta- mentation Champions, listening session participants, and tion of the Commission’s work, an overview of the report’s special guests.
SPEAKERS
Danielle Allen Stephen Heintz David Oxtoby Judy Woodruff Harvard University Rockefeller Brothers Fund American Academy of PBS Arts and Sciences David Brooks Eric Liu The New York Times Citizen University
10 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS, SOCIETY, AND THE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECT Making Justice Accessible
The two projects of the Making Justice Accessible initiative The second project, on Designing Legal Services for the address the challenge of providing legal services to low- 21st Century, will gather information about the national income Americans. The first project, on Data Collection need for improved legal access and advance a set of clear, and Legal Services for Low-Income Americans, will iden- national recommendations for closing the “justice gap” tify the sources of existing data on legal services and un- between supply of and demand for legal services. In the fall represented civil litigation nationwide. The project will of 2019, project leaders enlisted the research assistance of also create a blueprint for future data collection efforts, in- associates from the offices of WilmerHale and began draft- cluding establishing a research agenda for scholars, practi- ing the final report, on schedule to be released in Septem- tioners, and policy-makers. Participants include represen- ber 2020. tatives of the courts, legal aid providers, and foundations as well as legal scholars and social scientists. In the fall of The Making Justice Accessible initiative emerged from 2019, Microsoft’s pro bono office approached the Academy a 2015 symposium sponsored by the Academy’s Explor- about this project; the interactions led to a joint, data-gath- atory Fund on the state of legal services for low-income ering pilot project between Microsoft, members of the data Americans. working group, and the Texas state courts. Participants are poised to act upon, and amplify, the Academy’s recom- mendations once the report is published in late 2020.
DATA COLLECTION DESIGNING LEGAL PROJECT STAFF AND LEGAL SERVICES SERVICES FOR THE 21ST FOR LOW-INCOME CENTURY Tania Munz AMERICANS John Tessitore PROJECT CHAIRS PROJECT CHAIRS John Levi FUNDER Mark Hansen Legal Services Corporation; University of Chicago Sidley Austin LLP David M. Rubenstein Enhancement Fund Rebecca Sandefur Martha Minow Arizona State University Harvard Law School
Kenneth Frazier Merck & Co.
PROJECT PUBLICATION
“Access to Justice,” Dædalus edited by Lincoln Caplan, Lance Liebman & Rebecca Sandefur (2019)
11 Education and the Development of Knowledge
rojects in the Education and the Devel- opment of Knowledge program area in- P form policy and practice in support of high-quality, lifetime educational opportunities for all Americans. The program area continues the Academy’s enduring focus on the vital role education and knowledge development play in our nation and in our world. From advancing equitable educational outcomes to leveraging new developments in the learning sciences and digital technologies to questioning how domes- tic and international scholarly work may be af- fected by advances in machine learning, the Ed- ucation and the Development of Knowledge program area–through commissions, projects, convenings, and publications–draws upon scholars and practitioners from various fields and disciplines to explore the conditions that foster the creation, transfer, and preservation of knowledge in a global context.
12 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy EDUCATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF KNOWLEDGE
PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE
CHAIR Howard Gardner Paula D. McClain Morton Schapiro Harvard Graduate School Duke University Northwestern University Michael McPherson of Education formerly, Spencer Foundation Joseph Neubauer Marcelo Suárez-Orozco David L. Lee formerly, Aramark University of Massachusetts Clarity Partners, LP Corporation Boston; formerly, University MEMBERS of California, Los Angeles Richard Light Nancy Peretsman Deborah Loewenberg Ball Harvard Graduate School Allen and Company Beverly Daniel Tatum University of Michigan of Education Spelman College Paul Sagan Philip Bredesen Kathleen McCartney General Catalyst Partners former Governor of Tennessee Smith College
PROJECT Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education
The Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Educa- report, and an issue of Dædalus on improving teaching. tion is a multiyear initiative charged with examining the The key idea emerging from this body of work is that what current state of American undergraduate education, pro- was once a challenge of quantity in American undergrad- jecting the nation’s short-term and long-term education- uate education, of enrolling as many students as possible, al needs, and offering recommendations to strengthen all is increasingly a challenge of educational quality–of mak- aspects of undergraduate education. The Commission– ing sure that all students receive the education they need to whose members include leaders from higher education, succeed, that they are able to complete the studies they be- philanthropy, business, and government–reviewed the re- gin, and that they can do all this affordably. The Commis- search and data; met with students and faculty members, sion engaged in a range of outreach activities to make its experts, and state and federal policy-makers; and produced work as widely read as possible and to advance its recom- a data-based primer on the student journey through col- mendations around quality, completion, and affordability. lege, four in-depth research papers, a comprehensive final
COMMISSION CHAIRS Rebecca M. Blank John J. DeGioia Jeremy Johnson University of Wisconsin- Georgetown University Andela Roger Ferguson, Jr. Madison TIAA Jonathan F. Fanton Sherry Lansing John Seely Brown President Emeritus, American Sherry Lansing Foundation Michael McPherson formerly, Xerox PARC Academy of Arts and Sciences formerly, Spencer Foundation Research Nicholas Lemann Robert Hormats Columbia University Wesley G. Bush Kissinger Associates; formerly, Graduate School of COMMISSION MEMBERS Northrop Grumman U.S. Department of State Journalism
Joseph E. Aoun Carl A. Cohn Freeman A. Hrabowski III J. Michael Locke Northeastern University formerly, Claremont University of Maryland, formerly, Rasmussen, Inc. Graduate University Baltimore County Deborah Loewenberg Ball Monica Lozano University of Michigan Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. Jennifer L. Jennings College Futures Foundation Purdue University New York University Sandy Baum Urban Institute
13 CONTINUED Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education
Gail O. Mellow Shirley M. Tilghman Sandy Baum PROJECT STAFF LaGuardia Community Princeton University Urban Institute College Francesca Purcell Michelle Weise Ronald G. Ehrenberg Beth Niegelsky Diana Natalicio Strada Education Network Cornell University formerly, University of Texas at El Paso Bridget Terry Long FUNDERS DATA ADVISORY GROUP Harvard Graduate School Hilary Pennington MEMBERS of Education Carnegie Corporation Ford Foundation of New York Thomas Bailey Judith Scott-Clayton TIAA Institute Beverly Daniel Tatum Teachers College, Teachers College, Spelman College Columbia University Columbia University
PROJECT PUBLICATIONS
A Primer on the College Student Journey (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2016)
Undergraduate Financial Aid in the United States Judith Scott-Clayton (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2017)
The Complex Universe of Alternative Postsecondary Credentials and Pathways Jessie Brown and Martin Kurzweil, Ithaka S+R (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2017)
The Economic Impact of Increasing The Future of Undergraduate Education, College Completion The Future of America Sophia Koropeckyj, Chris Lafakis, and Adam Ozimek, (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2017) Moody’s Analytics; Foreword by Michael S. McPherson (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2017) “Improving Teaching: Strengthening the College Learning Experience,” Dædalus Policies and Practices to Support Undergraduate edited by Sandy Baum & Michael S. McPherson (2019) Teaching Improvement Aaron Pallas, Anna Neumann, and Corbin Campbell (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2017)
14 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy EDUCATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF KNOWLEDGE PROJECT VIDEOS
Cornell’s Active Learning Initiative video — National Florida State University’s Graduation Rates video – Priority: Quality National Priority: Completion
Cincinnati State’s Accelerate Program video – National Priority: Affordability
PROJECT MEETING
Young Adult Mental Health and Well-Being: Higher Education’s Responsibility
September 5–6, 2019 House of the Academy Cambridge, MA
On the campuses of residential colleges and universities, In this gathering of university presidents and mental young adults (eighteen to twenty-five years old) are expe- health leaders, several critical issues were considered: riencing an intensifying crisis of their mental health and the role of higher education in the development of young well-being. Students have increasing levels of depression adults; what students are telling us about their mental and anxiety, which interfere with and may interrupt both health during college and graduate education; how the cur- their academic and developmental progress. rent research on young adult development and well-being can frame our thinking; and how colleges and universities In many instances, higher education institutions have re- can engage with other institutions and entities to jointly sponded by expanding mental health services and resourc- foster the mental health of young adults. The goals of this es that focus on the individual student’s needs. However, meeting were to explore the roles colleges and universities the availability and provision of clinical care do not appear have in creating campus cultures that foster student men- to be mitigating the crisis. Perhaps a pivot to a systemic in- tal health and well-being; to deepen understanding of how tra- and inter-institutional response is required. Both men- recent research can inform this work; and to identify path- tal health leaders and university presidents may need to ways forward. consider addressing issues of academic climate and cul- ture, both on campuses and as promoted by the higher ed- ucation institutions collectively.
15 CONTINUED Young Adult Mental Health and Well-Being: Higher Education’s Responsibility
MEETING CHAIRS Elizabeth Gong-Guy Vikram Patel MODERATORS UCLA Campus and Student Harvard Medical School John J. DeGioia Resilience Paul Barreira Georgetown University Stephanie Pinder- Harvard Medical School Laura Horne Amaker David Oxtoby Active Minds McLean Hospital College Wendy Fischman American Academy of Mental Health Program Harvard University Arts and Sciences Paula Johnson Wellesley College Zoe Ragouzeos Suzy Nelson NYU Student Mental Health Massachusetts Institute PANELISTS Sarah K. Lipson of Technology Boston University School Julie Reuben Daniel Eisenburg of Public Health Harvard Graduate School Stephanie Bell Rose University of Michigan; of Education TIAA Institute Healthy Minds Network Jacqueline Looney Duke University Chad Wellmon Wayne Frederick University of Virginia Howard University
Michael Lomax (United Negro College Fund) at the meeting on Young Adult Mental Health and Well-Being: Higher Education’s Responsibility.
16 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy EDUCATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF KNOWLEDGE
TOP: Participants at the meeting on Young Adult Mental Health and Well-Being included healthcare professionals, college and university administrators, researchers, and advocates. Their discussions focused on mental health programs implemented at institutions across the country.
RIGHT: Elizabeth Gong-Guy (UCLA Campus and Student Resilience) presented on a panel that examined the data on student mental health and factors contributing to the rise in anxiety and depression in young people.
BELOW: Wayne Frederick (Howard University) and Jaqueline Looney (Duke University) describe the challenges of and strategies for addressing mental health issues at residential colleges and universities.
17 Global Security and International Affairs
he Global Security and Interna- tional Affairs program area draws T on the expertise of policy-mak- ers, practitioners, and scholars to foster knowledge and inform innovative and more substantial policies to address cru- cial issues affecting the global communi- ty. Projects underway in this area engage with pressing strategic development and moral questions that underpin relations among people, communities, and states worldwide. Each initiative embraces a broad conception of security as the inter- action among human, national, and glob- al security imperatives. Project recom- mendations move beyond the idea of se- curity as the absence of war toward higher aspirations of collective peace, develop- ment, and justice.
18 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy GLOBAL SECURITY AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
CHAIR Christopher Chyba Nicholas Kristof Barry Posen Princeton University The New York Times Massachusetts Institute Scott D. Sagan of Technology Stanford University Karl Eikenberry Susan Landau formerly, Stanford University; Tufts University Adam Roberts U.S. Army, ret. University of Oxford MEMBERS Robert Legvold Tanisha Fazal Columbia University Jennifer M. Welsh Nicholas Burns University of Minnesota McGill University Harvard University Rose McDermott Martha Finnemore Brown University Paul H. Wise Antonia Chayes George Washington Stanford University Tufts University University Steven E. Miller Harvard University
COMMITTEE MEETING
Annual Meeting of the Committee on International Security Studies (CISS)
October 10, 2019 House of the Academy Cambridge, MA
During the annual meeting, CISS members reviewed the members are seeking to ensure the impact of their various progress of current projects within the Global Security and scholarly activities, and brainstormed key areas for future International Affairs program area, discussed how CISS Academy work on global security and international affairs.
MEETING CHAIR
Scott D. Sagan Stanford University
KEYNOTE SPEAKERS
Karl Eikenberry formerly, Stanford University; U.S. Army, ret.
Nicholas Kristof The New York Times
Nicholas Kristof (The New York Times) and Tanisha Fazal (University of Minnesota)
19 PROJECT Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age, Phase One
The world has entered a new nuclear era. No longer dom- policy-makers, Congress, the analytical community, and inated by two nuclear superpowers, the evolving multipo- the media to think systematically about our increasingly lar nuclear order presents fundamental challenges to the multipolar world. The publications produced by the proj- conceptual and practical means of avoiding nuclear war. ect have been shared widely with domestic and interna- Moreover, the new era has slowly dismantled the bilateral tional policy-makers, scholars and students of nuclear af- arms control framework, with no clear prospect that it will fairs, and leaders of international organizations. be revived and extended. The possibility that a framework or frameworks encompassing other, let alone all, nuclear Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age is root- powers can be achieved seems even more remote. In addi- ed in the critically important work on arms control that tion, advances in weapons technology and the opening of the Academy conducted from 1958 to 1960 to prevent a new frontiers, such as cyber capabilities and artificial intel- nuclear confrontation between the United States and the ligence, make a shifting environment still more complex. Soviet Union. During that time Academy Fellows gath- The pathways to inadvertent nuclear war have multiplied ered monthly to build a cooperative framework between across more regions and relationships. the United States and the Soviet Union based on the lim- itations of the nuclear stockpile and the establishment of Since 2017, the Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear mutual vulnerability between the two rivals. The group in- Age project has worked to identify the major dangers gen- cluded Donald Brennan, Edward Teller, Henry Kissinger, erated by the dynamics of a multipolar nuclear world that and Thomas Schelling, among others. Today, more than pose the greatest threat of inadvertent nuclear war; offer ever, an effort that brings together scholars and policy- alternative approaches to addressing each of these dan- makers to examine the wide range of challenges posed by gers; facilitate discussions with relevant communities in the changing nuclear order is urgently needed. the United States and abroad; and encourage and assist
PROJECT CHAIRS WORKING GROUP Michael Krepon George Perkovich MEMBERS Stimson Center Carnegie Endowment for Robert Legvold International Peace Columbia University James M. Acton Hans Kristensen Carnegie Endowment for Federation of American Steven Pifer Christopher Chyba International Peace Scientists Stanford University; Princeton University Brookings Institution; Mark Bell Jessica Tuchman formerly, U.S. Department University of Minnesota Mathews of State STEERING COMMITTEE Carnegie Endowment for Linton Brooks International Peace William Potter Thomas J. Christensen Center for Strategic and James Martin Center for Princeton University International Studies; Nicholas Miller Nonproliferation Studies, formerly, U.S. Department Dartmouth College Middlebury Institute of Lynn Eden of Energy and U.S. International Studies at Stanford University National Nuclear Security Steven E. Miller Monterey Administration Harvard University Steven E. Miller Mira Rapp-Hooper Harvard University M. Taylor Fravel Vipin Narang Yale Law School Massachusetts Institute Massachusetts Institute Janne Nolan† of Technology of Technology Scott D. Sagan George Washington Stanford University University Sumit Ganguly Janne Nolan† Indiana University, George Washington Michael Swaine Scott D. Sagan Bloomington University Carnegie Endowment for Stanford University International Peace Francis J. Gavin Olga Oliker Jon Wolfsthal Johns Hopkins School of International Crisis Group; Nina Tannenwald Nuclear Crisis Group Advanced and International formerly, Center for Strategic Brown University Studies and International Studies
20 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy GLOBAL SECURITY AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS CONTINUED Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age, Phase One
Jane Vaynman PROJECT STAFF FUNDERS Temple University Poul Christiansen Louise Henry Bryson and Richard Rosenberg Keren Yarhi-Milo John E. Bryson Francesca Giovannini Kenneth L. and Susan S. Princeton University John F. Cogan, Jr. † Wallach Kathryn Moffat Lester Crown Tania Munz Alan M. Dachs Brendan Roach Bob and Kristine Higgins † Deceased Kathleen Torgesen
PROJECT PUBLICATIONS
Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age: Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age: U.S. and Russian Nuclear Concepts, Past and Present Nuclear Weapons in a Changing Global Order Linton Brooks, Alexei Arbatov, and Francis J. Gavin Steven E. Miller, Robert Legvold, and Lawrence Freedman (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2018) (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2019)
Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age: Contemplating Strategic Stability in a New Multipolar Emerging Risks and Declining Norms in the Age of Nuclear World Technological Innovation and Changing Nuclear Robert Legvold (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Doctrines 2019) Nina Tannenwald and James M. Acton, with an Introduction by Jane Vaynman (American Academy of “Meeting the Challenges of a New Nuclear Age,” Arts and Sciences, 2018) Dædalus edited by Robert Legvold & Christopher Chyba (2020)
21 PROJECT MEETING
Nuclear Weapons in a Changing Global Order: Hill Briefings
July 31, 2019 Capitol Hill Washington, DC
Steven Miller, a member of the project’s steering commit- MEETING CHAIR tee, and Academy staff briefed foreign policy and nation- al security staff in several Senate offices on the Academy’s Steven E. Miller work on Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age Harvard University as well as Promoting Dialogue on Arms Control and Dis- armament. The discussions focused on key project find- ings, background on the changing multipolar nuclear or- der, and plans for continued engagement around the Acad- emy’s portfolio of nuclear work.
PROJECT Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age, Phase Two: Deterrence and New Nuclear States
With the emergence of three new nuclear powers (In- investigates the deterrence and defense implications facing dia, Pakistan, and North Korea) and several more poten- small nuclear force-countries and potential proliferators. tially becoming nuclear states (including Iran, Saudi Ara- bia, and Turkey), the world is on the verge of a new nucle- The project is producing an edited volume of innovative, ar age, which will demand new thinking about the security policy-relevant essays that will be published by a universi- implications of nuclear powers that may be in highly hos- ty press. Outreach activities will be aimed at nuclear pol- tile environments, suffer from domestic instability, have icy-makers (primarily in the United States) and academ- fewer resources, or be led by personalist dictators. Phase ic centers and think tank institutes with a specific focus on Two of Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age nuclear studies.
PROJECT CHAIRS Jeffrey Lewis PROJECT STAFF FUNDERS Middlebury Institute for Scott D. Sagan International Studies at Poul Christiansen Louise Henry Bryson and Stanford University Monterey John E. Bryson Francesca Giovannini John F. Cogan, Jr. † Vipin Narang Rose McDermott Kathryn Moffat Massachusetts Institute Brown University Lester Crown Tania Munz of Technology Alan M. Dachs Barry Posen Brendan Roach Massachusetts Institute Bob and Kristine Higgins Kathleen Torgesen of Technology ADVISORY COMMITTEE Richard Rosenberg Victor Cha Gary Samore Kenneth L. and Susan S. Georgetown University Brandeis University Wallach
Lawrence Freedman Caitlin Talmadge King’s College London Georgetown University
Robert Jervis Columbia University † Deceased
22 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy GLOBAL SECURITY AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PROJECT MEETING
Deterrence and New Nuclear States Authors’ Workshop
November 17–18, 2019 Stanford University Stanford, CA
The authors of the forthcoming edited volume on deterrence and new nuclear states gathered for a two-day workshop to review the draft essays and discuss the volume’s cross-cutting conclusions and specific policy implications.
MEETING CHAIRS KEYNOTE SPEAKER
Scott D. Sagan Vipin Narang William J. Perry Stanford University Massachusetts Institute of Stanford University; formerly, Technology U.S. Department of Defense
Scott Sagan (Stanford University) addresses the authors and guests at the Deterrence and New Nuclear States authors’ workshop. From left to right: Reid Pauly (Stanford University), William J. Perry (Stanford University; formerly, U.S. Department of Defense), and Jeffrey Lewis (Middlebury Institute for International Studies at Monterey).
23 PROJECT Promoting Dialogue on Arms Control and Disarmament
Unlike the Cold War, the current nuclear age is charac- to contribute to rebuilding trust and predictability among terized by a simultaneous collapse of arms control agree- the rival Great Powers. ments and the absence of any strategic dialogue among the three main nuclear players, which would serve to minimize A second strand of work will build on the Academy’s ex- and reduce the potential risks of a nuclear escalation. perience organizing educational sessions for the Unit- ed States Congress on a range of topics, including cyber- One strand of the project’s work consists of a series of security, disaster response, and federal research policy bilateral U.S.-Russia and U.S.-China dialogues designed in addition to nuclear issues. Through a series of engage- to identify critical short-term goals in arms control. The ments with members of Congress and their staff, the proj- meetings will identify areas for cooperation and con- ect will help to foster and strengthen knowledge on key is- ceptual thinking about measures that might strength- sues and challenges facing the United States in arms con- en strategic stability and help to reduce the significant trol and international security, including renewal of the dangers of nuclear weapons being used in the future. New START treaty and the dangers of a world without nu- Through reports and outreach activities, the project aims clear constraints.
PROJECT CHAIR PROJECT STAFF FUNDER
Steven E. Miller Poul Christiansen Tania Munz The Raymond Frankel Harvard University Foundation Francesca Giovannini John Randell Kathryn Moffat Brendan Roach Kathleen Torgesen
PROJECT MEETINGS
The Collapse of Arms Control: Shanghai Bilateral Meeting Implications and Consequences December 4–5, 2019 October 23, 2019 Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Capitol Hill Shanghai, China Washington, D.C. Project Chair Steven Miller led a delegation of U.S. former This briefing for congressional staffers from both House officials and experts to a two-day meeting that focused on and Senate offices highlighted the perils associated with a number of arms control issues in order to gain a better the decline and potential collapse of arms control and un- understanding of Chinese perspectives on current arms derscored the urgent need for dialogue among the key pro- control priorities. The meetings also revealed the areas on tagonists, particularly in the United States and Russia. which Chinese experts would like to engage further with Project Chair Steven Miller discussed how the global nu- U.S. and Russian experts. clear order has evolved since the Cold War, the implica- tions of the collapse of arms controls agreements, the ab- MEETING CHAIR sence of any strategic dialogue among the three main nu- clear players that would serve to minimize and reduce the Steven E. Miller potential risks of a nuclear escalation, and the Academy’s Harvard University current nuclear policy work.
MEETING CHAIR
Steven E. Miller Harvard University
24 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy GLOBAL SECURITY AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
Steven Miller (Harvard University) speaking Steven Miller (front center) with participants at the to congressional staffers, with Kathryn Shanghai Bilateral Meeting. Moffat (American Academy) to his right.
PROJECT Civil Wars, Violence, and International Responses
The Civil Wars, Violence, and International Responses international outreach to share findings and recommen- project stems from the observation that current multilater- dations that deliver a more comprehensive, effective, and al approaches for preventing, mitigating, and resolving civ- integrated approach to conflict prevention and crisis man- il wars and intrastate violence are often far too ambitious. agement, which encompasses security, diplomacy, and de- They frequently overpromise stability, security, peace, de- velopment strategies in countries such as Colombia, Nige- mocracy, and development to countries experiencing high ria, Ethiopia, Syria, Lebanon, and Sri Lanka, among oth- levels of violence and instability. The project identified ers. Building on these policy discussions, the project will six threats that emerge from civil wars and intrastate vio- publish a research paper that focuses on the policy im- lence: pandemic diseases, transnational terrorism, migra- plications of the project’s findings, which will be distrib- tion, regional instability, great power conflict, and crimi- uted to relevant policy-makers in the United States and nality. The project has engaged in extensive domestic and internationally.
PROJECT CHAIRS Abdeta D. Beyene Susanna Campbell Vanda Felbab-Brown Centre for Dialogue, American University Brookings Institution Karl Eikenberry Research, and Cooperation, formerly, Stanford University; Ethiopia Martha Crenshaw Francis Fukuyama U.S. Army, ret. Stanford University Stanford University Stephen D. Biddle Stephen Krasner Columbia University Lyse Doucet Sumit Ganguly Stanford University BBC News Indiana University Tanja A. Börzel Freie Universität Berlin Tanisha Fazal Miguel García-Sánchez PROJECT MEMBERS University of Minnesota Universidad de los Andes, Charles Call Colombia Michele Barry American University James Fearon Stanford University Stanford University
25 CONTINUED Civil Wars, Violence, and International Responses
Richard Gowan Nancy Lindborg Barry Posen PROJECT STAFF New York University United States Institute Massachusetts Institute of Peace of Technology Francesca Giovannini Sonja Grimm Summers Hammel University of Konstanz, Sarah Kenyon Lischer William Reno Germany Wake Forest University Northwestern University Kathryn Moffat Tania Munz Jean-Marie Guéhenno Clare Lockhart Thomas Risse International Crisis Group Institute for State Effectiveness Freie Universität Berlin Kathleen Torgesen
Joseph Hewitt Aila M. Matanock Hendrik Spruyt United States Institute University of California, Northwestern University FUNDERS of Peace Berkeley Stephen Stedman Humanity United Stephen Heydemann Seyoum Mesfin Stanford University Smith Richardson Foundation Smith College Institute for Advanced Research, Ethiopia Eric Stollenwerk Oak Foundation Bruce Jones Freie Universität Berlin Brookings Institution Stewart Patrick Council on Foreign Relations Paul H. Wise Stathis Kalyvas Stanford University Yale University
PROJECT PUBLICATIONS
“Civil Wars & Global Disorder: Threats & Opportunities,” Dædalus edited by Karl Eikenberry & Stephen Krasner (2017)
“Ending Civil Wars: Constraints & Possibilities,” Dædalus edited by Karl Eikenberry & Stephen Krasner (2018)
26 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy GLOBAL SECURITY AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PROJECT Rethinking the Humanitarian Health Response to Violent Conflict
Rethinking the Humanitarian Health Response to Violent a series of rapid-cycle workshops on global cooperation and Conflict seeks to understand and address current trends in pandemic control. Drawing upon the Academy’s strengths humanitarian contexts that pose new or evolving challeng- in political science, diplomacy, global health, and the arts, es for humanitarian health responders. Among the most the project will explore how political legitimacy, trust in ex- pressing challenges are the increasingly protracted nature pert authority and information, divisive political environ- of civil and noninternational armed conflict; the fact that ments, and cultural mechanisms of community protection many of the world’s most violent places are facing criminal and social cohesion shape the ability of states and interna- or political violence rather than conflict as conventionally tional institutions to respond to infectious outbreaks. understood; shortfalls in funding; and changing geopolit- ical relations. This project brings together political scien- Second, to respond to the acute challenges that humanitar- tists, legal and security experts, health professionals, and ian organizations face in addressing health needs in areas humanitarians to examine current challenges to effective with extreme levels of political or criminal violence–set- humanitarian action and to develop, where necessary, new tings that now account for more violent deaths than war strategies for preventing civilian harm and delivering criti- zones–and in places where people are fleeing from such vi- cal health services in areas plagued by violent conflict. olence, the project will convene interdisciplinary groups of experts from across multiple regions to explore the ques- The project’s initial work will focus on two key priority ar- tions state sovereignty poses for humanitarians operating eas. First, building on its efforts to address the political and in such settings and to analyze and examine how the dy- security dimensions of pandemic response in areas of weak namics of political and criminal violence influence human- governance and violent conflict, the initiative will convene itarian responses.
PROJECT CHAIRS PROJECT STAFF FUNDERS
Jaime Sepulveda Paul H. Wise Francesca Giovannini Louise Henry Bryson and University of California, Stanford University John E. Bryson Kathryn Moffat San Francisco Tania Munz Jennifer M. Welsh Rebecca Tiernan McGill University Kathleen Torgesen
PROJECT MEETINGS
Meetings in New York City
New York, NY February 27–28, 2020
During a series of individual and small-group meetings, the project cochairs solicited input from experts with ex- tensive experience in policy and diplomacy relating to hu- manitarian responses in areas of violent conflict and ex- treme levels of political and criminal violence.
MEETING CHAIRS
Jennifer M. Welsh Paul H. Wise McGill University Stanford University
27 The Humanities, Arts, and Culture
ince 1780, the Academy has advocated for the importance of the humanities, arts, and culture in American society, and has called S on both private citizens and the nation’s government to help fos- ter advances in these areas. Today, the Academy conducts research and develops policy recommen- dations to advance the humanities in academic scholarship and in the public sector, to display the importance of the arts in society, and to en- rich the nation’s cultural life. By bringing together scholars, artists, and leaders from both the public and private sectors, Academy programs in The Humanities, Arts, and Culture put practitioners and scholars in conversation with individuals from other disciplines, ensuring that the arts and humanities are valued in all areas of civic life. Projects in this area demonstrate the value of the arts, humanities, and culture to the nation’s security and prosperity, and call attention to the role played by work in these fields to enriching the health of communities and the dai- ly lives of its citizens.
28 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy THE HUMANITIES, ARTS, AND CULTURE
PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE
CHAIR MEMBERS Maria Hummer-Tuttle Jahan Ramazani The J. Paul Getty Trust University of Virginia Johanna Drucker Richard Brodhead University of California, Duke University Jacqueline Jones Oscar Tang Los Angeles University of Texas at Austin New York, NY Colin Dayan Vanderbilt University Mary C. Kelley Pauline Yu University of Michigan American Council of Thomas Gunning Learned Societies University of Chicago Jane Dammen McAuliffe Library of Congress
PROJECT Commission on the Arts
The Commission on the Arts seeks to reframe the national that the arts are necessary to both individual and civic life conversation about what role the arts can play in a diverse and that artists are crucial members of healthy communi- twenty-first-century democracy. The national focus of the ties. Among other reports and creative elements, the Com- project is reflected in the composition of its membership, mission’s final products will include policy recommenda- which spans the cultural field and the geography of the tions that will help arts advocates, educators, artists, and United States; its members represent over a dozen states government officials to refocus the national conversation and more than forty organizations, disciplines, and insti- on the arts around common issues. tutions. The Commission is guided by the central premise
COMMISSION CHAIRS Rod Bigelow James Cuno Vijay Gupta Crystal Bridges Museum The J. Paul Getty Trust Street Symphony John Lithgow of American Art Actor and Author Paul DiMaggio Vicky Holt Takamine Terence Blanchard New York University Pua Ali‘i ‘Ilim Deborah F. Rutter Jazz Trumpeter and Composer The John F. Kennedy Center Oskar Eustis Maria Hummer-Tuttle for the Performing Arts Mary Bordeaux The Public Theater The J. Paul Getty Trust First Peoples Fund Natasha Trethewey Katherine Farley Gish Jen Northwestern University Pam Breaux Lincoln Center for the Novelist National Assembly of State Performing Arts Arts Agencies Brian Kisida COMMISSION MEMBERS Theaster Gates, Jr. University of Missouri Jeffrey Brown Rebuild Foundation Diane Ackerman PBS NewsHour Angela La Porte Author, Poet, and Naturalist Paula Giddings University of Arkansas Louise H. Bryson Smith College Elizabeth Alexander The J. Paul Getty Trust Tania León The Andrew W. Mellon Olivia Gude Composer and Conductor Foundation Francis Collins School of the Art Institute National Institutes of Health of Chicago Robert Lynch Maribel Alvarez Americans for the Arts The University of Arizona
29 CONTINUED Commission on the Arts
Sonia Manzano Victoria Rogers Carrie Mae Weems PROJECT STAFF Actress and Author John S. and James L. Knight Photographer Foundation Mary Lyons Michael O’Bryan Damian Woetzel Allentza Michel The Village of Arts and Jacqueline Stewart The Juilliard School Humanities The University of Chicago Tania Munz Jay Xu Felix Padrón Yancey Strickler Asian Art Museum of Arts Management Kickstarter San Francisco FUNDERS Professional and Artist Steven Tepper Kevin Young Ford Foundation Annise Parker Arizona State University Schomburg Center for The Getty Foundation LGBTQ Victory Fund Research in Black Culture Roberta Uno The John S. and James L. Mwalim (Morgan James Arts in a Changing America Laura Zabel Knight Foundation Peters) Springboard for the Arts The Kresge Foundation University of Massachusetts Zannie Voss Dartmouth Southern Methodist The Barr Foundation University National Center Roger and Victoria† Sant for Arts Research
† Deceased
PROJECT MEETINGS
Branches from the Same Tree: Conversations on the Integration of Arts, Humanities, and STEM in Higher Education
October 25, 2019 House of the Academy Cambridge, MA
The Academy hosted a one-day conference in partnership Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education. The with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and conference included interactive and engaging panel presen- Medicine on their recently released report Branches from tations, performances, and breakout discussions, each ex- the Same Tree: The Integration of the Humanities and Arts with ploring a different element of cross-disciplinary learning.
SPEAKERS Sarah Cunningham Leila Kinney Sunil Iyengar Rhode Island School Massachusetts Institute National Endowment Francisco Alarcon of Design of Technology for the Humanities Boston University Bonnie Thornton Dill Lynn Pasquerella Ilya Vidrin Sari Altschuler University of Maryland Association of American Harvard University Northeastern University Colleges and Universities
30 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy THE HUMANITIES, ARTS, AND CULTURE “Rural Arts and Cultural Development” Webinar
December 4, 2019 Virtual Event
The second webinar sponsored by the Commission exam- and economic development. Each panelist brought a unique ined new developments in arts and culture in rural commu- perspective to the conversation, from producing events nities. The featured panelists discussed how rural commu- and festivals to building support networks of artists to em- nities are uniquely leveraging the arts to foster community ploying art as a catalyst for social conversations.
WEBINAR CHAIR SPEAKERS Jonny Stax Matthew Fluharty Consultant and Founder Art of the Rural Laura Zabel Kara Schmidt of ArtFarm (Iowa) (regional Midwest) Springboard for the Arts PaoliFest and Black Vulture Project (Indiana) Michelle Ramos Alternate Roots (regional South)
Actors from Catalyst Collaborative@MIT perform a scene from Einstein’s Dreams at the event “Branches from the Same Tree: Conversations on the Integration of Arts, Humanities, and STEM in Higher Education.”
31 Meeting of the Commission
January 16–17, 2020 Los Angeles Athletic Club Los Angeles, CA
The third Commission meeting focused on project vision- connections among the working groups, outreach strate- ing and strategy planning. Four local facilitators with deep gies, and potential policy recommendations. In addition experience in the arts and cultural sector as well as project to project development, the meeting also included an eve- design and implementation worked with each of the work- ning reception celebrating the arts in Los Angeles, featur- ing groups to develop focused products and preliminary ing Mayor Eric Garcetti and Vijay Gupta. workplans. As a full group, the Commissioners discussed
MEETING CHAIRS SPEAKERS
John Lithgow Natasha Trethewey Eric Garcetti Vijay Gupta Actor and Author Northwestern University City of Los Angeles Street Symphony
Deborah Rutter The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts
Commission Cochair John Lithgow (Actor and Author) describes the work of the Commission on the Arts at a Los Angeles reception connected to the Commission’s meeting on January 16–17, 2020.
32 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, and Donors to the Academy THE HUMANITIES, ARTS, AND CULTURE PROJECT The Humanities Indicators
The Humanities Indicators provide information about all as- rigorous survey research and analyses of data gathered by pects of the humanities: ranging from early childhood read- the federal government. Recent work has included national ing, through undergraduate and graduate education in the surveys of humanities departments at four-year colleges and humanities, and on to employment and experiences later in universities, as well as a survey of over five thousand Amer- life with museums and other humanistic activities. Now in icans about their engagement with and attitudes about a va- its eleventh year as a publicly available website, the project riety of humanities activities. The Humanities Indicators tracks the condition of the humanities enterprise via its own are accessible at www.amacad.org/humanities-indicators.
PROJECT DIRECTOR Jonathan R. Cole Esther Mackintosh PROJECT STAFF Columbia University Federation of State Norman M. Bradburn Humanities Councils Carolyn Fuqua NORC at the University John Dichtl John Garnett of Chicago American Association for Anne Ruggles Gere State and Local History University of Michigan Tania Munz Robert B. Townsend ADVISORY COMMITTEE Michael Hout Judith Tanur New York University Stony Brook University Edward Ayers FUNDER University of Richmond Felice J. Levine Steven Wheatley American Educational American Council of Andrew W. Mellon Jack Buckley Research Association Learned Societies, emeritus Foundation American Institutes for Research
The The The The Humanities Humanities Humanities Humanities INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS THE VALUE OF READING THE VALUE OF HISTORY THE VALUE OF READING in Our Lives Efforts to revitalize the Hawaiian language began in Our Lives Many studies have documented the value of in Our Lives In a national survey in the early 1990s, Ameri- in Our Lives Reading remains simultaneously both enter- in 1983 with private, nonprofit preschools known reading to young children, so much so that in cans expressed doubts when asked about the val- tainment and education. Extensive studies in the as Pūnana Leo (language nests), which used immer- 2014 the American Academy of Pediatricians ad- ue of “history” but spoke passionately about the val- UK have documented the way that reading for recre- sion methods to teach Hawaiian to a handful of chil- vised “that reading aloud and talking about pictures ue of understanding the past as a connection to fami- ation contributes to relaxation, enjoyment, empower- dren. At the time, fewer than 50 children under age 18 and words in age-appropriate books can strengthen ly and a way of understanding contemporary issues and ment, and empathy in adults. Adult reading for pleasure spoke the language at home. Thousands of children are language skills, literacy development and parent-child events. History shapes connections to communities, as is also correlated with an improved sense of community AMERICA’S NATIVE now enrolled annually in these schools. Data from 2013– READING TO relationships.” Children who listen to family members HISTORIC SITES well as perceptions of current events. READING FOR and cultural understanding. 2015 suggest that students from these schools graduate read to them grow into better and more enthusiastic LANGUAGES from high school at rates above both the state-wide and YOUNG CHILDREN readers. IN THE U.S. INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS PLEASURE INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS Native Hawaiian averages and attend college at rates The United States has always been a land of many lan- above the Native Hawaiian average. From Dr. Seuss to The Very Hungry Caterpillar, books INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS Americans often think about themselves through their For two decades, the Trails and Tales Institute, run by If you love to lose yourself in a good book, now is a ter- New Hampshire Humanities sponsors the Connec- guages. Before Europeans arrived, more than 300 indig- In 1978, Hawaiian was made an official language of touch children’s imagination and help them make sense family histories and their more general connection to Peru State College in Nebraska, has offered summer rific time to be a reader, with an ever-growing number tions program to support and enhance adult literacy. enous languages were spoken in North America. As a the state alongside English, marking an end to policies of the world. Over 80% of parents read to their young Reach Out and Read (ROR) focuses on reaching young the past, which helps explain the widespread popular- courses and tours to teachers to improve their ability of new titles published annually. Despite the growth in Connections facilitators work in four-week workshops result of forced cultural assimilation, Native American, that had suppressed the language since 1896. Members children at least three times a week, a number that has children when they visit doctors and nurse practi- ity of genealogy in the nation. Despite these personal to guide students in the state’s history and literature. At the number of books available, however, Americans are with more than 500 participants annually—both native Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian communities suf- of the Native Hawaiian community develop instruction- not changed significantly since 1995. tioners. ROR teaches parents about why reading to chil- ties, the share of Americans visiting historic sites has de- the institute, Peru State faculty teach a five-day course, reading less literature than they did just five years ago. speakers and English language learners—to foster en- fered massive losses of language and culture. Since the al materials and train teachers, while also promulgat- dren is important—and hands out the books to do it. clined substantially since 1982, even after a small im- followed by a six-day tour of over 25 locations. thusiasm for and engagement with reading. civil rights era, many of these communities have begun ing best practices that can be replicated in other Native Last year, ROR provided services to 4.7 million children, provement in 2017. KEY FACTS “Our intent is to inspire and invigorate these teachers, KEY FACTS “Quality books and stimulating discussions promote to reclaim and preserve their languages and encourage American communities. 25% of whom were part of low-income families, at a cost who will in turn develop a better appreciation for our English language skills, cultivate conversations about their revitalization. Upwards of 90% of mothers with bachelor’s degrees of $20 per child. From 1992 to 2012, according to the Survey of Pub- KEY FACTS state in their students.” ideas, reinforce family literacy, support a culture of Data corroborate that instruction in indigenous lan- read to their children at least three times a week. lic Participation in the Arts, the number of Americans The Ten Largest Native North American Languages “Families participating in the Reach Out and Read reading, and encourage civic engagement.” guages offers substantial benefits for Native American In 2017, 28% of American adults reported visiting a Participants travel to Fort Robinson, where Crazy who read a book outside of work or school fell from by Number of Speakers over the Age of 5 Children from lower income families were 16% less model read to their children more often (4.3 vs. 3.8 society that extend beyond mere bilingualism. With the historic site in the previous year, an increase of over Horse died; the hometowns of writers John Niehardt 61% to 54%. Participants keep the books they read or share them likely to be read to. days/week), and their toddlers’ receptive and expres- Native American Languages Act of 1990, these languag- Navajo 4 percentage points compared to 2012. and Willa Cather; Chimney Rock; Ash Hollow; the Ne- with family, and families are also invited to Connections’ sive vocabulary scores were higher, even when adjust- In 2017, the average American spent less than half es were recognized with a distinctive political status and Yupik braska State House; and many other sites. Dr. Holtz, yearly family festival. In addition to an online book list, Dakota ing for parental education, foreign-born status, and As people aged, they were less likely to visit a histor- an hour per day reading for personal interest (as cultural importance. Share of Families Reading to Young Children, one of the program’s faculty, said of the history the Connections hosts individual author visits, sponsors an Apache language proficiency.” ic site. The drop-off in historic site visitation over the compared to more than 2 hours 45 minutes per day by Characteristic, 2012 mini-course covers, “So many of these stories are inspir- active blog, and offers a variety of other reader and fa- Keres life course is at least 25%. watching TV). 100% Studies of ROR’s outcomes have found that the pro- ing, not just because they show milestones of progress, cilitator resources to encourage a habit of reading. KEY FACTS Cherokee Ojibwa 80% gram more than doubles the likelihood that parents will but because they show the kind of progress that is only Share of American Visiting Historic Site, 1987–2017 Share of Americans Who Read a Book Other Than The U.S. Census reports that 150+ Native American Choctaw read to their children and that they will keep books in earned through perseverance and battles with preju- 60% for Work or School in Past 12 Months, by Age, 2012 languages are still in use today in the U.S. Some es- Zuni the home. These studies also indicate that for children 40% dice and injustice.” 40% 70% timates project that, without sustained intervention, Pima involved in ROR, language development improves by an 35% 60% 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 20% 30% only around 20 will remain by 2050. average of 3–6 months. 50% 25% 0% 40% These languages are collectively spoken by over 20% High Income Low Income College High School Men 30% 450,000 people, with the top 10 spoken by nearly half Degree Degree 15% The Humanities in Our Lives series The Humanities in Our Lives series Women The Humanities in Our Lives series 20% The Humanities in Our Lives series 10% this number. (#HumInOurLives) highlights the many Income Level Mother's Education (#HumInOurLives) highlights the many (#HumInOurLives) highlights the many 10% (#HumInOurLives) highlights the many and diverse forms of humanities and diverse forms of humanities 5% and diverse forms of humanities and diverse forms of humanities 0% activities in the nation, and key facts activities in the nation, and key facts 0% activities in the nation, and key facts 18–24 25–34 35–44 45–54 55–64 65–74 75+ All Ages activities in the nation, and key facts about the health of the field. about the health of the field. 1982 1992 2002 2008 2012 2017 about the health of the field. 18+ about the health of the field.
For more on the broad trends that mark American engagement with For more on the broad trends that mark American engagement with For more on the broad trends that mark American engagement with For more on the broad trends that mark American engagement with various forms of the humanities, visit humanitiesindicators.org or various forms of the humanities, visit humanitiesindicators.org or various forms of the humanities, visit humanitiesindicators.org or various forms of the humanities, visit humanitiesindicators.org or email [email protected]. email [email protected]. email [email protected]. email [email protected].
Americas-Native-Languages_NEW.indd 1 11/6/2018 2:07:18 PM Reading-to-Young-Children_NEW.indd 1 11/6/2018 2:43:40 PM Historic-Sites-in-the-US_Revision.indd 1 10/31/2019 10:01:26 AM Reading-for-Pleasure_NEW.indd 1 11/6/2018 2:43:06 PM
33 34 2020 • Projects, Publications, Meetings, andDonors totheAcademy