Ecoregions of Wisconsin
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin
Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin ON ATI RM FO K CREE MILLER 0 20 40 mi Douglas Member 0 50 km Lake ? Crab Member EDITORS C O Kent M. Syverson P P Florence Member E R Lee Clayton F Wildcat A Lake ? L L Member Nashville Member John W. Attig M S r ik be a F m n O r e R e TRADE RIVER M a M A T b David M. Mickelson e I O N FM k Pokegama m a e L r Creek Mbr M n e M b f a e f lv m m i Sy e l M Prairie b C e in Farm r r sk er e o emb lv P Member M i S ill S L rr L e A M Middle F Edgar ER M Inlet HOLY HILL V F Mbr RI Member FM Bakerville MARATHON Liberty Grove M Member FM F r Member e E b m E e PIERCE N M Two Rivers Member FM Keene U re PIERCE A o nm Hersey Member W le FM G Member E Branch River Member Kinnickinnic K H HOLY HILL Member r B Chilton e FM O Kirby Lake b IG Mbr Boundaries Member m L F e L M A Y Formation T s S F r M e H d l Member H a I o V r L i c Explanation o L n M Area of sediment deposited F e m during last part of Wisconsin O b er Glaciation, between about R 35,000 and 11,000 years M A Ozaukee before present. -
Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region. -
2. Blue Hills 2001
Figure 1. Major landscape regions and extent of glaciation in Wisconsin. The most recent ice sheet, the Laurentide, was centered in northern Canada and stretched eastward to the Atlantic Ocean, north to the Arctic Ocean, west to Montana, and southward into the upper Midwest. Six lobes of the Laurentide Ice Sheet entered Wisconsin. Scale 1:500,000 10 0 10 20 30 PERHAPS IT TAKES A PRACTICED EYE to appreciate the landscapes of Wisconsin. To some, MILES Wisconsin landscapes lack drama—there are no skyscraping mountains, no monu- 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 mental canyons. But to others, drama lies in the more subtle beauty of prairie and KILOMETERS savanna, of rocky hillsides and rolling agricultural fi elds, of hillocks and hollows. Wisconsin Transverse Mercator Projection The origin of these contrasting landscapes can be traced back to their geologic heritage. North American Datum 1983, 1991 adjustment Wisconsin can be divided into three major regions on the basis of this heritage (fi g. 1). The fi rst region, the Driftless Area, appears never to have been overrun by glaciers and 2001 represents one of the most rugged landscapes in the state. This region, in southwestern Wisconsin, contains a well developed drainage network of stream valleys and ridges that form branching, tree-like patterns on the map. A second region— the northern and eastern parts of the state—was most recently glaciated by lobes of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, which reached its maximum extent about 20,000 years ago. Myriad hills, ridges, plains, and lakes characterize this region. A third region includes the central to western and south-central parts of the state that were glaciated during advances of earlier ice sheets. -
Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils. -
Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain
92° 91° 90° 89° 88° Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Cape Girardeau 73cc 72 io Ri Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and quantity of This level III and IV ecoregion map was compiled at a scale of 1:250,000 and depicts revisions and Literature Cited: PRINCIPAL AUTHORS: Shannen S. Chapman (Dynamac Corporation), Oh ver environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research, subdivisions of earlier level III ecoregions that were originally compiled at a smaller scale (USEPA Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Omernik, J.M., 1987, Ecoregions of the conterminous United States (map Barbara A. Kleiss (USACE, ERDC -Waterways Experiment Station), James M. ILLINOIS assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. By recognizing 2003, Omernik, 1987). This poster is part of a collaborative effort primarily between USEPA Region Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map) (supplementary supplement): Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 77, no. 1, Omernik, (USEPA, retired), Thomas L. Foti (Arkansas Natural Heritage p. 118-125, scale 1:7,500,000. 71 the spatial differences in the capacities and potentials of ecosystems, ecoregions stratify the VII, USEPA National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (Corvallis, Oregon), table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W.H., and Commission), and Elizabeth O. Murray (Arkansas Multi-Agency Wetland Bailey, R.G.): Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Planning Team). 37° environment by its probable response to disturbance (Bryce and others, 1999). -
Door County Here to Help Transportation Vehicle Purchase & Repair Loans
Rentals Group & Door-Tran: Options Door County Here to help Transportation Vehicle purchase & repair loans America’s Best Choice Rentals Half-price travel & gasoline Resource Guide - Young Automotive, Sturgeon Bay vouchers 920-743-9228 Volunteer transportation for Avis Rent-A-Car veterans and Door County - Super 8, Sturgeon Bay residents 920-743-7976 - Tailwind Flight Center Trip planning 920-746-9250 Information & referral Door County Trolley to get you - Customer tours, groups, parades, where you need to go! festivals, weddings This program is funded in part by the Federal Transit Administration 920-868-1100 (FTA) as authorized under 49 U.S.C. Section 5310 Mobility Options of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program (CFDA 20.521) www.doorcountytrolley.com Door-Tran operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, and national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Door Peninsula Sales & Storage Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes she or he has been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI - Vehicle, trailer, & snowmobile rentals may file a complaint with Door-Tran. 920-743-7297 Lamers Bus Lines - Wheelchair accessible - Small to large groups 800-236-1240 Sah’s Auto, Inc. 1009 Egg Harbor Road PO Box 181 - Vehicle rentals Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235-0181 920-743-1005 www.door-tran.org Email: [email protected] Sunshine House, Inc. Phone: 920-743-9999 - Wheelchair accessible Toll-free: 877-330-6333 - Group transportation 920-743-7943 Door-Tran Here to get you Volunteer Transportation -
Central Region Technical Attachment 91-23 an Excessive Lake
/Ws-oVT A-7f CRH SSD OCTOBER 1991 CENTRAL REGION TECHNICAL ATTACHMENT 91-23 AN EXCESSIVE LAKE-ENHANCED SNOWFALL EPISODE OVER NORTHEAST WISCONSIN ON DECEMBER 13-15, 1989 Eugene S. Brusky National Weather Service Office Green Bay, Wisconsin Thomas D. Helman National Weather Service Forecast Office Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1. Introduction During the late fall and early winter months, the well known lake effect snows frequently develop over portions of the western Great Lakes. Areas most susceptible to heavy lake snows are typically in Upper Michigan, along Lake Superior and along the eastern shoreline of Lake Michigan. These areas commonly experience a cold and dry northwesterly wind flow which gathers moisture from the lakes and deposits it in the form of snow. Orographic lifting, such as along the Gogebic Range in Upper Michigan, helps to enhance and localize the heaviest snowfall. Tn comparison, heavy lake effect snow along the western shores of Lake Michigan is not as common since the prevailing wind direction in the winter is northwest, and not a more favorable northeast. The purpose of this paper is to examine a heavy lake enhanced snowfall episode which occurred over northeast Wisconsin. During a 2-day period from December 13-15, 1989, up to 30 inches of snow fell over a portion of Wisconsin's Door Peninsula. This event was characterized by a snowband which initially formed over Lake Michigan and moved westward before becoming quasi-stationary over northeast Wisconsin. The snovband was then observed to rotate cyclonically over northeast Wisconsin in concert with a mid-level shear axis. It will be shown that the heavy snowfall was caused by a combination of lake induced mesoscale and synoptic scale weather features. -
Bildnachweis
Bildnachweis Im Bildnachweis verwendete Abkürzungen: With permission from the Geological Society of Ame- rica l – links; m – Mitte; o – oben; r – rechts; u – unten 4.65; 6.52; 6.183; 8.7 Bilder ohne Nachweisangaben stammen vom Autor. Die Autoren der Bildquellen werden in den Bildunterschriften With permission from the Society for Sedimentary genannt; die bibliographischen Angaben sind in der Literaturlis- Geology (SEPM) te aufgeführt. Viele Autoren/Autorinnen und Verlage/Institutio- 6.2ul; 6.14; 6.16 nen haben ihre Einwilligung zur Reproduktion von Abbildungen gegeben. Dafür sei hier herzlich gedankt. Für die nachfolgend With permission from the American Association for aufgeführten Abbildungen haben ihre Zustimmung gegeben: the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Box Eisbohrkerne Dr; 2.8l; 2.8r; 2.13u; 2.29; 2.38l; Box Die With permission from Elsevier Hockey-Stick-Diskussion B; 4.65l; 4.53; 4.88mr; Box Tuning 2.64; 3.5; 4.6; 4.9; 4.16l; 4.22ol; 4.23; 4.40o; 4.40u; 4.50; E; 5.21l; 5.49; 5.57; 5.58u; 5.61; 5.64l; 5.64r; 5.68; 5.86; 4.70ul; 4.70ur; 4.86; 4.88ul; Box Tuning A; 4.95; 4.96; 4.97; 5.99; 5.100l; 5.100r; 5.118; 5.119; 5.123; 5.125; 5.141; 5.158r; 4.98; 5.12; 5.14r; 5.23ol; 5.24l; 5.24r; 5.25; 5.54r; 5.55; 5.56; 5.167l; 5.167r; 5.177m; 5.177u; 5.180; 6.43r; 6.86; 6.99l; 6.99r; 5.65; 5.67; 5.70; 5.71o; 5.71ul; 5.71um; 5.72; 5.73; 5.77l; 5.79o; 6.144; 6.145; 6.148; 6.149; 6.160; 6.162; 7.18; 7.19u; 7.38; 5.80; 5.82; 5.88; 5.94; 5.94ul; 5.95; 5.108l; 5.111l; 5.116; 5.117; 7.40ur; 8.19; 9.9; 9.16; 9.17; 10.8 5.126; 5.128u; 5.147o; 5.147u; -
Level III Ecoregions of the Continental United States 3
1. Coast Range 2. Puget Lowland Level III Ecoregions of the Continental United States 3. Willamette Valley 4. Cascades (Revised August 2002) 5. Sierra Nevada National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory 6. Southern and Central California 77 Chaparral and Oak Woodlands 77 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 7. Central California Valley 1 2 2 8. Southern California Mountains 9. Eastern Cascades Slopes and Foothills 15 41 42 10. Columbia Plateau 10 11. Blue Mountains 49 17 48 12. Snake River Plain 82 10 17 13. Central Basin and Range 1 3 17 14. Mojave Basin and Range 4 17 15. Northern Rockies 11 58 16. Idaho Batholith 16 17 17. Middle Rockies 43 50 17 58 18. Wyoming Basin 51 19. Wasatch and Uinta Mountains 50 9 46 51 58 20. Colorado Plateaus 17 21. Southern Rockies 83 59 78 12 17 84 22. Arizona/New Mexico 4 80 57 58 Plateau 52 60 42 53 62 23. Arizona/New Mexico 56 Mountains 62 84 24. Chihuahuan Deserts 18 44 47 25. Western High Plains 57 61 57. Huron/Erie Lake Plains 26. Southwestern Tablelands 64 84 58. Northeastern Highlands 5 19 69 27. Central Great Plains 54 59. Northeastern Coastal Zone 28. Flint Hills 13 60. Northern Appalachian Plateau 55 29. Central Oklahoma/Texas Plains 70 63 and Uplands 25 40 30. Edwards Plateau 1 7 61. Erie Drift Plain 20 31. Southern Texas Plains 21 27 62. North Central Appalachians 32. Texas Blackland Prairies 67 63. Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain 66 33. East Central Texas Plains 64. -
Wisconsin's John Muir
Wisconsin’s John Muir An Exhibit Celebrating the Centennial of the National Park Service “Oh, that glorious Wisconsin wilderness! “Everything new and pure in the very prime of the spring when Nature’s pulses were beating highest and mysteriously keeping time with our own!” “Wilderness is a necessity... Mountain parks and reservations are useful not only as fountains of timber and irrigating rivers, but as fountains of life.” This exhibit was made possible through generous support from the estate of John Peters and the Follett Charitable Trust Muir in Wisconsin “When we first saw Fountain Lake Meadow, on a sultry evening, sprinkled with millions of lightning- bugs throbbing with light, the effect was so strange and beautiful that it seemed far too marvelous to be real.” John Muir (1838–1914) was one of America’s most important environmental thinkers and activists. He came to Wisconsin as a boy, grew up near Portage, and attended the University of Wisconsin. After decades of wandering in the mountains of California, he led the movement for national parks and helped create the Sierra Club. But for much of his life, Muir’s call to protect wild places fell on deaf ears. Muir studied science in Madison but quit in 1863 without a degree, “...leaving one University for another, the Wisconsin University for the University of the Wilderness.” Muir’s letter to the classmate who taught him botany at UW The Movement for National Parks Yosemite Valley “Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in, where Nature may heal and cheer and give strength to body and soul alike.” In 1872, Congress named Yellowstone the first national park. -
65Th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004
65th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004 Weis Earth Science Museum Menasha, Wisconsin The Lake & The Ledge Geological Links between the Niagara Escarpment and Lake Winnebago Joanne Kluessendorf & Donald G. Mikulic Organizers The Lake & The Ledge Geological Links between the Niagara Escarpment and Lake Winnebago 65th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004 by Joanne Kluessendorf Weis Earth Science Museum, Menasha and Donald G. Mikulic Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign With contributions by Bruce Brown, Wisconsin Geological & Natural History Survey, Stop 1 Tom Hooyer, Wisconsin Geological & Natural History Survey, Stops 2 & 5 William Mode, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Stops 2 & 5 Maureen Muldoon, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Stop 1 Weis Earth Science Museum University of Wisconsin-Fox Valley Menasha, Wisconsin WELCOME TO THE TH 65 ANNUAL TRI-STATE GEOLOGICAL FIELD CONFERENCE. The Tri-State Geological Field Conference was founded in 1933 as an informal geological field trip for professionals and students in Iowa, Illinois and Wisconsin. The first Tri-State examined the LaSalle Anticline in Illinois. Fifty-two geologists from the University of Chicago, University of Iowa, University of Illinois, Northwestern University, University of Wisconsin, Northern Illinois State Teachers College, Western Illinois Teachers College, and the Illinois State Geological Survey attended that trip (Anderson, 1980). The 1934 field conference was hosted by the University of Wisconsin and the 1935 by the University of Iowa, establishing the rotation between the three states. The 1947 Tri-State visited quarries at Hamilton Mound and High Cliff, two of the stops on this year’s field trip. -
April 20, 2017 Robert Kaplan Acting Regional Administrator U.S
State of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Scott Walker, Governor 101 S. Webster Street Cathy Stepp, Secretary Box 7921 Telephone 608-266-2621 Madison WI 53707-7921 Toll Free 1-888-936-7463 TTY Access via relay - 711 April 20, 2017 Robert Kaplan Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 5 77 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604-3507 Subject: Supplemental Information for 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Area Designations Dear Mr. Kaplan: On October 1, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised both the primary and secondary ozone NAAQS. On September 21, 2016, in accordance with section 107(d)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), Governor Walker recommended that all counties in Wisconsin be designated as attainment for this standard. In support of the governor’s recommendation, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) is submitting the enclosed technical support document (TSD). EPA should consider this supporting information and ensure it is reflected in any modifications to the governor’s recommendation EPA elects to make in the “120 day” notifications that would occur prior to final designations. While the general concept of ozone formation and transport in the Lake Michigan basin has long been recognized, this TSD incorporates data from a variety of sources, some of which were unavailable until recently. This includes: Analysis of ozone data from the lakeshore and inland monitors operated by WDNR in both Sheboygan and Kenosha counties to help understand the lakeshore ozone gradient; Analysis of wind data when values above the 2015 ozone standard have been measured at shoreline monitors; Recent HYSPLIT and source apportionment modeling results; Photochemical modeling conducted by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO).