DOCSLIB.ORG

Hackney: a Place for Everyone?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hackney: a Place for Everyone? July 2016 Hackney: A Place for Everyone? Resident’s Survey and Campaign Analysis report Document Number: 17355558 Document Name: Hackney a place for everyone FINAL report Ipsos MORI |July 2016 | FINAL 1 | Internal Use Only © 2016 Ipsos MORI – all rights reserved. The contents of this report constitute the sole and exclusive property of Ipsos MORI. Ipsos MORI retains all right, title and interest, including without limitation copyright, in or to any Ipsos MORI trademarks, technologies, methodologies, products, analyses, software and know-how included or arising out of this report or used in connection with the preparation of this report. No licence under any copyright is hereby granted or implied. The contents of this report are of a commercially sensitive and confidential nature and intended solely for the review and consideration of the person or entity to which it is addressed. No other use is permitted and the addressee undertakes not to disclose all or part of this report to any third party (including but not limited, where applicable, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act 2000) without the prior written consent of the Company Secretary of Ipsos MORI. 15-050563-01 | Version FINAL 1 | Internal Use Only | This work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the international quality standard for Market Research, ISO 20252:2012, and with the Ipsos MORI Terms and Conditions which can be found at http://www.ipsos-mori.com/terms. © Ipsos MORI 2016. Document Number: 17355558 Document Name: Hackney a place for everyone FINAL report Ipsos MORI |July 2016 | FINAL 1 | Internal Use Only Contents 1 Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 8 3 Technical note ........................................................................................................................... 12 4 Headline views on life in the borough ................................................................................... 15 5 Hackney’s local community .................................................................................................... 25 6 Hackney’s local economy and housing .................................................................................. 37 7 Local environment and amenities .......................................................................................... 44 8 Views of Hackney Council ....................................................................................................... 52 9 Communication and information ........................................................................................... 58 10 Future of public services in Hackney ..................................................................................... 66 11 Appendices ................................................................................................................................ 74 Appendix A: Survey sample profile ........................................................................................... 74 Appendix B: Guide to statistical reliability ................................................................................ 75 Appendix C: Brief guide to social grade definitions ................................................................. 77 Appendix D: Neighbourhoods classification ............................................................................. 78 Appendix E: Survey questionnaire .............................................................................................. 79 List of Figures Figure 2.1: ‘Hackney: A Place for Everyone?’ campaign questionnaire ................................................................... 10 Figure 4.1: Satisfaction with the local area .................................................................................................................. 15 Figure 4.2: Satisfaction with local area – changes in overall satisfaction and dissatisfaction over time ........... 16 Figure 4.3: Overall change in the local area over the last five years ........................................................................ 17 Figure 4.4: Overall views about what has got better in the local area .................................................................... 18 Figure 4.5: Overall views about what has got worse in the local area ..................................................................... 19 Figure 4.6: Overall changes in Hackney over last 10 years - campaign findings ................................................... 20 Figure 4.7: Overall impact of changes over last 10 years – campaign findings ..................................................... 20 Figure 4.8: Verbatim comments in relation to the top issues highlighted – campaign findings ........................ 21 Figure 4.9: Overall views about what would improve quality of life locally – survey findings ........................... 22 Figure 5.1: Aspects of the local community that have got better/ worse – survey findings ............................... 25 Figure 5.2: Concern about impact of population growth on local services ............................................................ 26 Figure 5.3: Aspects of the local community that have got better/ worse – campaign findings ......................... 27 Figure 5.4: Impact of changes in relation to the local community – campaign findings ..................................... 27 Figure 5.5: Verbatim comments in relation to the local community – campaign findings .................................. 28 Figure 5.6: Inequality in Hackney .................................................................................................................................. 29 Figure 5.7: Levels of cohesion ........................................................................................................................................ 30 Figure 5.8: Attitudes to mixing in the community ..................................................................................................... 31 Figure 5.9: Mixing socially with people from different socio-economic backgrounds ........................................ 31 Document Number: 17355558 Document Name: Hackney a place for everyone FINAL report Ipsos MORI |July 2016 | FINAL 1 | Internal Use Only Figure 5.10: Verbatim comments in relation mixing in the local community – campaign findings ................... 32 Figure 5.11: Sense of belonging .................................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 5.12: Friendships and loneliness ........................................................................................................................ 34 Figure 5.13: Verbatim comments in relation to sense of belonging – campaign findings .................................. 34 Figure 6.1: Aspects of the local economy and housing that have got better/ worse – survey findings ............ 38 Figure 6.2: Aspects of the local economy and housing that have got better/ worse – campaign findings ...... 39 Figure 6.3: Impact of changes in relation to the local economy and housing – campaign findings .................. 39 Figure 6.4: Verbatim comments in relation to the local economy and housing – campaign findings ............... 40 Figure 6.5: Affordability of living in Hackney now and for future generations .................................................... 41 Figure 6.6: Job opportunities in Hackney .................................................................................................................... 42 Figure 7.1: Aspects of the local environment that have got better/ worse – survey findings ............................. 44 Figure 7.2: Aspects of local services/ amenities that have got better/ worse – survey findings ......................... 45 Figure 7.3: Aspects of the local environment that have got better/ worse – campaign findings ....................... 46 Figure 7.4: Impact of changes in relation to local environment – campaign findings.......................................... 46 Figure 7.5: Aspects of local services/ amenities that have got better/ worse – campaign findings ................... 47 Figure 7.6: Impact of changes in relation to local services/ amenities – campaign findings ............................... 47 Figure 7.7: Verbatim comments in relation to the local environment – campaign findings ............................... 48 Figure 7.8: Verbatim comments in relation to local services/ amenities – campaign findings ........................... 49 Figure 8.1: Overall satisfaction with Hackney Council ............................................................................................... 52 Figure 8.2: Overall changes in satisfaction with the Council over time .................................................................. 53 Figure 8.3: Changes in the quality of the Council services ........................................................................................ 53 Figure 8.4: Attitudes towards council services and interaction with residents ...................................................... 54 Figure 9.1: Feeling informed about Hackney Council ................................................................................................ 58 Figure 9.2: Changes in feeling informed about the Council
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hackney Central Conversation Report
    Hackney Central Conversation Consultation Report 2021 black 8 mm clearance all sides white 8 mm clearance all sides CMYK 8 mm clearance all sides Contents Introduction 3 Section 1: Starting the Conversation 4 Project background 4 Consultation approach 4-5 Advertisements 6 How to read this report 6 Section 2: Data Collection Methodology 7 Data collection 7 Verifying comments 7 Face-to-face engagement 8 Analysing your comments and interpreting the data 8-9 Section 3: Respondent analysis 10 Demographics 10 Postcode analysis 10-13 Section 4: Insights Analysis 14-15 Section 5: What are you commenting on? Identified issues 17 Transport 18-20 Greenspaces 21-22 Streetscene and public realm design 22-24 Local economy 24-27 Buildings and developments 28 Sense of place 29-30 Proposals outlined in the comments 31-33 Section 6: The places and spaces that make Hackney Central 34-36 Next Steps 37 Introduction Hackney Council launched the Hackney Central Conversation in July 2019 so local people could tell us what they love about Hackney Central, the challenges they experience, and what changes they would like to see the council make in the area. The approach for the project was about early, ongoing and honest dialogue with those who live, work and visit the area so that they can influence change in their community. The Conversation focused on two streams of work: Moving around Hackney Central and community mapping exercise. Moving around Hackney Central The Council was previously awarded £10m of funding from Transport for London through the Liveable Neighbourhood Scheme to transform Hackney Central by reducing traffic in the area and redesigning its three dangerous junctions – Pembury Circus, Mare Street/Graham Road and Mare Street/Morning Lane – to make them safer for cyclists, pedestrians and public transport users.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction 1.1 What This Chapter Covers
    Children and Young People: introduction | 1 1 Introduction 1.1 What this chapter covers This chapter presents data on issues affecting the health and wellbeing of children and young people in the London Borough of Hackney and the City of London. The analysis identifies areas of unmet need through examination of health inequalities and by comparing local data with other areas and over time. The chapter also outlines the evidence for what works in meeting children and young people’s health needs, and describes key services and support available locally with regards to prevention, identification and care/treatment. Much of the information contained within this chapter has been drawn from two health needs assessments conducted over the period 2015-2016 – one for 0-5 year olds, and the other for 5-19 year olds. These needs assessments can be found on the Hackney Council website. 1 The main local services for children and young people are listed within this chapter to highlight the range of support that is available. However, this is not intended to be a comprehensive directory of all local services. To search for further services in Hackney, please consult the ‘Children & Young People’s Resource Guide’, which has recently been updated (July 2016) by Hackney Children’s and Young People’s Services (CYPS).2 Please note, given the small number of children and young people resident in the City of London, many services are shared with neighbouring boroughs. However, they are not always shared with Hackney (for instance, youth offending is shared with Tower Hamlets). Where possible, services covering the City of London have been described.
    [Show full text]
  • De Beauvoir Ward
    DE BEAUVOIR WARD HEALTH & WELLBEING PROFILE 2016 adult obesity rate below average for borough smoking rate socioeconomic similar to deprivation lower average for than the borough Hackney average 9,800 residents rates of lower than hypertension and average rates diabetes lower than of hospital borough average admissions better than average self reported health Health & Wellbeing Profile – De Beauvoir Ward This profile describes the health and wellbeing of residents of De Beauvoir Ward in the context of the wider Hackney population, including information concerning important contributory factors such as age, ethnicity, deprivation and population change. This profile is intended to provide summary information on the health of the local population, to inform residents and support decision making. For more information on the health indicators found in this report, please see Hackney’s Joint Strategic Needs Assessment – www.hackney.gov.uk/jsna More general Ward level information can be found on the council’s Shared Evidence Base website.1 There is also more information on Public Health England’s Local Health website,2 and the GLA also produces Ward level information.3 Notes on the data: Data sources: Much of the data come from local health services, including GP data extracted from EMIS via the Clinical Effectiveness Group at Queen Mary University. These data relate to diagnosed or recorded conditions so will not include undetected illness. In April 2015, geographically coded data were unavailable from 2 practices using a different IT system (the Dalston Practice in Hackney Central, and the Abney House Practice in Stoke Newington) – this makes the data for these areas somewhat less reliable, and will be improved in future versions of these profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Introduction 1. This Appendix Sets out How The
    Appendix B Introduction 1. This appendix sets out how the proposed warding scheme addresses the second and third of the Boundary Commission’s three statutory criteria for local government electoral reviews: the need to secure equality of representation; the need to reflect the identities and interests of local communities; and the need to secure effective and convenient local government. 2. Hackney’s diverse mix of people from different backgrounds gives it the third greatest degree of ethnic diversity, and the fifth greatest degree of religious diversity amongst local authorities in England and Wales. Ethnic and religious groups are widely dispersed across the borough. The one exception to this is the Orthodox Jewish/Charedi community in the Stamford Hill area, which is noticeably more concentrated than other groups. 3. Nearly three in five Hackney residents say they feel they belong either fairly or very strongly to their local neighbourhood (57%). This compares well to the London average of 52%. Many people feel they ‘belong’ in many different ways – to a small local area or estate, to one of Hackney’s distinctive sub-localities (source: Hackney Cohesion Review, published July 2010). 4. Our approach has been to seek to strengthen this identification with local areas through their reflection in the proposed warding arrangements, including retaining existing wards where possible, while correcting some known anomalies, for example where a small part of a housing estate falls in a different ward to the majority of the estate. 5. The fundamental problem that we have had to address is the imbalance between the south west of the borough and the north.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science the Reel City
    The London School of Economics and Political Science The Reel City: London, symbolic power and cinema Rahoul Masrani A thesis submitted to the Department of Media and Communications of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, January 2016 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................... 4 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 9 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 An IntErdisciplinary Enquiry into thE Global City ................................................ 13 1.3 Symbolic PowEr ................................................................................................................ 16 1.3.1 Symbolic power and the media ........................................................................................... 18 1.4 CinEma and thE City ........................................................................................................ 22 1.5 London in Cinema ........................................................................................................ 28 1.6 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • King's Park Ward
    KING’S PARK WARD HEALTH & WELLBEING PROFILE 2016 child overweight rate average and adult obesity rate high for borough smoking rates socioeconomic average for deprivation higher Hackney than the borough average 13,400 residents rates of higher than hypertension average rates of and diabetes hospital higher than admissions Hackney average self reported health worse than borough average Health & Wellbeing Profile – King’s Park Ward This profile describes the health and wellbeing of residents of King’s Park Ward in the context of the wider Hackney population, including information concerning important contributory factors such as age, ethnicity, deprivation and population change. This profile is intended to provide summary information on the health of the local population, to inform residents and support decision making. For more information on the health indicators found in this report, please see Hackney’s Joint Strategic Needs Assessment – www.hackney.gov.uk/jsna More general Ward level information can be found on the council’s Shared Evidence Base website.1 There is also more information on Public Health England’s Local Health website,2 and the GLA also produces Ward level information.3 Notes on the data: Data sources: Much of the data come from local health services, including GP data extracted from EMIS via the Clinical Effectiveness Group at Queen Mary University. These data relate to diagnosed or recorded conditions so will not include undetected illness. In April 2015, geographically coded data were unavailable from 2 practices using a different IT system (the Dalston Practice in Hackney Central, and the Abney House Practice in Stoke Newington) – this makes the data for these areas somewhat less reliable, and will be improved in future versions of these profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Hackney's Draft Inclusive Economy Strategy 2019-2025
    Hackney’s Draft Inclusive Economy Strategy 2019-2025 Draft for engagement and consultation July 2019 Cover sheet - plain text version Contents Our vision for an inclusive economy in Hackney P2 Overview of our approach - Leading by example and our three strategic priorities P4-6 - Why we need this strategy - the policy context P7-10 - Ways we can promote an inclusive local economy P11-14 - Guiding principles for this work P14-15 - How we will know we if we are creating a more inclusive economy P16 Strategic Priority 1: Support local neighbourhoods and town centres P17 to thrive and to be inclusive, resilient places - Context, challenges and opportunities P17-25 - Outcomes, objectives and priorities P26 - Area regeneration approach - specific plans for area regeneration P27-35 in different places around the borough - Supporting objectives - what we are doing P35-41 Strategic Priority 2: Champion local business and social enterprise in Hackney and protect and maximise the delivery of affordable workspace in the borough: - Context, challenges and opportunities P42-45 - Outcomes, objectives and priorities P45 - Objectives - what we are doing P46-52 Strategic Priority 3: Connect residents to support and opportunities P53 to learn new skills, get good quality work and to make progress in work over their career - Context, challenges and opportunities P53-61 - Outcomes, objectives and priorities P61-62 - Objectives - what we are doing P62-68 1 Our vision for an inclusive economy in Hackney We want the widest range of residents, local businesses, social enterprises, and community institutions to contribute, participate in and benefit from the opportunities which arise from a successful economy in Hackney.
    [Show full text]
  • Hackney Downs Ward
    HACKNEY DOWNS HEALTH & WELLBEING PROFILEWARD 2016 child overweight and adult obesity rates average for borough smoking rate socioeconomic higher than deprivation similar Hackney to the borough average average 13,600 residents rate of recorded higher than severe mental average rate of illness higher emergency hospital than average admissions higher than average rate of low birth weight babies Health & Wellbeing Profile – Hackney Downs Ward This profile describes the health and wellbeing of residents of Hackney Downs Ward in the context of the wider Hackney population, including information concerning important contributory factors such as age, ethnicity, deprivation and population change. This profile is intended to provide summary information on the health of the local population, to inform residents and support decision making. For more information on the health indicators found in this report, please see Hackney’s Joint Strategic Needs Assessment – www.hackney.gov.uk/jsna More general Ward level information can be found on the council’s Shared Evidence Base website.1 There is also more information on Public Health England’s Local Health website,2 and the GLA also produces Ward level information.3 Notes on the data: Data sources: Much of the data come from local health services, including GP data extracted from EMIS via the Clinical Effectiveness Group at Queen Mary University. These data relate to diagnosed or recorded conditions so will not include undetected illness. In April 2015, geographically coded data were unavailable from 2 practices using a different IT system (the Dalston Practice in Hackney Central, and the Abney House Practice in Stoke Newington) – this makes the data for these areas somewhat less reliable, and will be improved in future versions of these profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • HACKNEY CENTRAL PUBLIC ART STRATEGY FRONT COVER IMAGE: Pineapple, Bryan Poole
    HACKNEY CENTRAL PUBLIC ART STRATEGY FRONT COVER IMAGE: Pineapple, Bryan Poole. In the Caribbean, Europe and North America, the pineapple became associated with the return of ships from extended voyages, and an emblem of welcome and hospitality. Later this communal symbol of friendship and hospitality also became a favourite motif of architects. Stone and brass pineapples were used as decorative motifs at the entrance to private and state buildings. INTRO From exotic gardens to contemporary media tapestries. Establishing Hackney as one of the must-see boroughs of London. Hackney Central is undergoing transformation. The aims of this strategy are: As well as the borough’s civic heart with Hackney’s - To promote connectivity by establishing a series beautifully restored art deco Town Hall and Council of visual links between Hackney Central Station, chambers, Hackney Central is also a cultural Mare Street, Morning Lane, Bohemia Place and the destination. The broad offer ranges from Sutton House St John’s Churchyard, which in turn will promote museum to Grade II listed Hackney Empire theatre, economic well-being. the newly renovated Hackney Picturehouse cinema, - To create a palette of creative innovations contemporary music venues such as Oslo and St John that complement the ongoing public realm at Hackney Church. improvements by introducing art to cultivate and The area is built on a rich history of fashion strengthen a sense of place, drawing attention manufacturing from the migrated Huguenot silk to local heritage and stimulating community makers once based in Sutton House to the bustle of engagement. East London’s rag trade. With significant investment The strategy employs creative, cutting edge into the borough, Hackney is gearing up to be at the and eco-friendly technology to deliver contemporary centre of the next fashion manufacturing revival.
    [Show full text]
  • Hackney Choicehomes Lettings Area Bidding Closes 08 February 2021
    Hackney ChoiceHomes Lettings Area Bidding closes 08 February 2021 HACKNEY Hindrey Road, London, E5 8HG HAGGERSTON Loanda Close, Hackney, London, E8 4EL Ref:216458 CENTRAL Ref:216683 Landlord: Peabody Trust Landlord: Hackney Type: Bungalow Bedrooms:1 Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Bedsizes: 1 double Level: Ground floor Bedsizes: 1 double Level: 1st floor Other: 50+ ONLY. Close to Hackney Central station and Other: Close to Haggerston overground station, buses and local amenities. PERMIT PARKING ONLY. local amenities. TENANTS TO PAY THAMES WATER CHARGES. RENT TBA RENT (no other charges) £93.37 Weekly HACKNEY WICK San House, Bradstock Road, Hackney, HACKNEY WICK Upton House, 9 Ward Lane, London, E9 Ref:216686 E9 5DL Ref:216687 5QZ Landlord: Notting Hill Housing Trust Landlord: Network Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Bedsizes: 1 double Level: Ground floor Bedsizes: 1 double Level: 2nd floor Other: PREFERENCE GIVEN TO THOSE NEEDING Other: AFFORDABLE RENT. Close to Homerton overground WETROOM. AFFORDABLE RENT, Close to Homerton station, bus routes, shops and local amenities. overground station, buses and local amenities. RENT (including charges of £8.70) £206.09 Weekly RENT (no other charges) £260.80 Weekly HOXTON WEST Crondall Court , Hoxton , Hackney , LONDON FIELDS Cordwainer House , Mare Street , Ref:216681 London , N1 6JH Ref:216698 Hackney , E8 4RB Landlord: Hackney Landlord: Metropolitan Housing Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Bedsizes: 1 double Level: Ground floor Bedsizes: 1 double Level: 4th floor Other: Close to Hoxton overground, and local amenities. Other: STARTER TENANCY. Close to Hoxton overground TENANTS TO PAY THAMES WATER CHARGES. station, bus routes, shops and local amenities.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Ward
    VICTORIA WARD HEALTH & WELLBEING PROFILE 2016 child overweight and adult obesity rates average for borough smoking rates socioeconomic are among the deprivation similar highest in to borough average Hackney 12,900 residents higher than rates of stroke average rate of and back pain emergency low for Hackney hospital admissions higher than average rate of alcohol related admissions Health & Wellbeing Profile – Victoria Ward This profile describes the health and wellbeing of residents of Victoria Ward in the context of the wider Hackney population, including information concerning important contributory factors such as age, ethnicity, deprivation and population change. This profile is intended to provide summary information on the health of the local population, to inform residents and support decision making. For more information on the health indicators found in this report, please see Hackney’s Joint Strategic Needs Assessment – www.hackney.gov.uk/jsna More general Ward level information can be found on the council’s Shared Evidence Base website.1 There is also more information on Public Health England’s Local Health website,2 and the GLA also produces Ward level information.3 Notes on the data: Data sources: Much of the data come from local health services, including GP data extracted from EMIS via the Clinical Effectiveness Group at Queen Mary University. These data relate to diagnosed or recorded conditions so will not include undetected illness. In April 2015, geographically coded data were unavailable from 2 practices using a different IT system (the Dalston Practice in Hackney Central, and the Abney House Practice in Stoke Newington) – this makes the data for these areas somewhat less reliable, and will be improved in future versions of these profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Online Tube
    Tube map 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Outside fare zones Outside Check before you travel Cheshunt Epping § Heathrow Towards Towards Chesham Watford Junction fare zones TfL Rail customers should change at 9 Chalfont &8 7 St Albans City and Luton Airport Parkway Welwyn Garden City Enfield Town 8 7 Theydon Bois Theobalds Grove 9 Latimer Terminals 2 & 3 for free rail transfer Watford High Street Bush Hill Debden Shenfield to Terminal 5. Watford Cockfosters Amersham New Barnet Park Turkey Street Elstree & Borehamwood High Barnet Loughton --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Chorleywood Bushey Oakwood A § Heathrow Terminal 4 Croxley 8 Totteridge & Whetstone Southbury Chingford Buckhurst Hill 6 Closed until further notice. Rickmansworth Carpenders Park 7 Woodside Park Southgate Brentwood Oakleigh Park Edmonton Green --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Moor Park 6 Roding Grange West Finchley § Hounslow West Arnos Grove Valley Hill 5 Hatch End 5 Silver Street Highams Park Step-free access for manual Northwood Edgware Mill Hill East Stanmore Bounds Green Chigwell Harold Wood wheelchairs only. West Ruislip Headstone Lane 4 New Southgate White Hart Lane Northwood Hills Hainault --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finchley Central Woodford Gidea Park Hillingdon Ruislip Harrow & Canons Park Burnt Oak Mill Hill Broadway Wood Green Bruce Grove Pinner Wealdstone § South Kensington Ruislip Manor Harringay Wood Street Fairlop Romford Colindale Green
    [Show full text]