Ÿþt H E S U C C E S S I O N O F S T a T E S I N R E L a T I O N T O M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ÿþt H E S U C C E S S I O N O F S T a T E S I N R E L a T I O N T O M Document:- A/CN.4/149 and Add.1 The Succession of States in relation to Membership in the United Nations - Memorandum prepared by the Secretariat Topic: Succession of States and Governments Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission:- 1962 , vol. II Downloaded from the web site of the International Law Commission (http://www.un.org/law/ilc/index.htm) Copyright © United Nations SUCCESSION OF STATES AND GOVERNMENTS DOCUMENT A/CN.4/149 AND ADD.l The succession of States in relation to membership in the United Nations: memorandum prepared by the Secretariat [Original text: English] [3 December 1962] I. INTRODUCTION territories of British India except certain designated territories which will constitute Pakistan. 1. At a meeting of the Sub-Committee on the Suc- cession of States and Governments held during the "What is the effect of this development on mem- fourteenth session of the International Law Commis- bership and representation of India in the United sion, the Secretary of the Commission stated that the Nations ? Secretariat would undertake the preparation of a memo- "From the legal standpoint, the Indian Inde- randum on the problem of succession of States in pendence Act may be analysed as effecting two relation to membership of the United Nations. The separate and distinct changes; Commission took note of this statement in its report.1 "1. From the viewpoint of international law, the 2. This memorandum is accordingly submitted for situation is one in which a part of an existing the use of the Sub-Committee and of the Commission. State breaks off and becomes a new State. On this In this regard there are three significant cases. The analysis, there is no change in the international status first is that of the admission of Pakistan in 1947; of India; it continues as a State with all the treaty that was the first occasion on which a new State rights and obligations, and consequently, with all whose territory had formerly formed part of a Member the rights and obligations of membership in tbe United of the United Nations was admitted to the Organization. Nations. The territory which breaks off, Pakistan, Though the issue of succession was raised, Pakistan will be a new State; it will not have the treaty rights went through the usual procedure for admission, and and obligations of the old State, and it will not, of that procedure has been followed by all other new course, have membership in the United Nations. States which formerly were parts of Members and "In international law, the situation is analogous which have been admitted to the United Nations. The to the separation of the Irish Free State from second case is the formation in 1958 of the United Great Britain, and of Belgium from the Netherlands. Arab Republic by union between Egypt and Syria. In these cases, the portion which separated was con- The third case is the departure of Syria from the sidered a new State; the remaining portion continued United Arab Republic in 1961. as an existing State with all the rights and duties which it had before. II. THE ADMISSION OF PAKISTAN TO MEMBERSHIP, "2. Apart from the question of separation, the 2 1947 Independence Act has effected a basic constitutional 3. In August 1947, an original Member of the change in India. The existing State of India has United Nations divided into two States, India and become a Dominion, and consequently, has a new Pakistan. Before the arrival of the date set for this status in the British Commonwealth of Nations, change (15 August 1947), the Secretariat, for the independence in external affairs, and a new form of purposes of its administrative functions, was obliged government. It is clear, however, that this basic to consider the legal consequences in regard to mem- constitutional change does not affect the international bership and representation in the United Nations. A personality of India, or its status in the United legal opinion of 8 August 1947 by the Assistant Sec- Nations. The only question it raises is whether retary-General for Legal Affairs was approved and new credentials should be requested for the Indian made public by the Secretary-General.3 This legal representatives in the organs of the United Nations. opinion was as follows: Although there is no precedent for this situation in the United Nations, there is some basis in diplomatic "The Indian Independence Act provides that on practice for requesting new credentials in cases of the fifteenth day of August, 1947, two Independent States which have undergone a change of sovereignty, Dominions shall be set up in India to be known as from a monarchy to a republic. It would, there- respectively as India and Pakistan. Under this Act, fore, seem appropriate for the Secretary-General the new Dominion of India will consist of all the to suggest to the Government of India that in view of the change in sovereignty, it would be desirable 1 General Assembly, Official Records, Seventeenth Session, Supplement No. 9 (A/5209), para. 72. to have new credentials issued to the Indian repre- 2 The facts of this case are also summarized in the Repertory sentatives by the Head of the Government or the of Practice of United Nations Organs, vol. I, Article 4, paras. Foreign Minister of the new Dominion of India. 32-37. 3 United Nations Press Release PM/473, 12 August 1947 "In conclusion, the effect of the Independence (English only). Act may be summarized as follows: 101 102 Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II "1. The new Dominion of India continues as an "4. Subject to articles 2 and 3 of this agreement, original Member State of the Unitd Nations with rights and obligations under all international agree- all rights and obligations of membership. ments to which India is a party immediately before "2. Pakistan will be a new non-member State. the appointed day will devolve both upon the Do- In order for it to become a Member of the United minion of India and upon the Dominion of Pakistan, Nations, it would have to apply for admission pur- and will, if necessary, be apportioned between the suant to Article 4 of the Charter, and its application two Dominions." would be handled under the pertinent rules of pro- 6. On IS August 1947, the date on which Pakistan cedure of the General Assembly and the Security became independent, the Minister for Foreign Affairs Council. of Pakistan sent the following cable to the Secretary- General :5 "3. The representatives of India on the Economic and Social Council and the representative of India "On behalf of the Government of Pakistan, I have participating in the discussion of the Indonesian case the honour to say that in my Government's view in the Security Council should be requested to submit both the Dominions of India and Pakistan should new credentials after August 15 issued by the Head become Members of the United Nations, automati- of Government, or the Foreign Minister of the new cally, with effect from 15 August. If, however, this Dominion of India." view is not accepted, I hereby apply for the admission of Pakistan as a Member of the United Nations. 4. In the meanwhile, the representatives of India Pakistan is prepared to accept the obligations con- and Pakistan had been considering the problem of the tained in the Charter of the United Nations." devolution of international rights and obligations, and 7. The Security Council took up the application of arrived at an agreement which, though reached on 6 6 August, was not promulgated until 14 August, and Pakistan on 18 August 1947. The Council decided to was communicated to the United Nations only on 27 consider the matter directly, without previous reference August 1947, in a letter from the representative of to its Committee on the Admission of New Members. India.4 The agreement was promulgated by the Gov- The claim of Pakistan to succession to the membership ernor-General in the Schedule to the Indian Inde- of India was not specifically considered, but after a pendence (International Arrangements) Order, 1947, brief discussion in which the representative of India which provided that: supported "the application of Pakistan for membership", the Council voted unanimously in favour on "the ques- "The agreement set out in the Schedule to this tion of admitting Pakistan to membership in the United Order shall, as from the appointed day, have the Nations". The representative of Poland then remarked effect of an agreement duly made between the Do- that the vote could not be used as a precedent to omit minion of India and the Dominion of Pakistan." consideration by the Committee on the Admission of 5. The agreement read as follows: New Members. He continued: "Agreement as to the devolution of international "The state of affairs is not clear to us. We do rights and obligations upon the Dominions of India not fully know whether Pakistan was born out of and Pakistan India or whether two new States have come into "1. The international rights and obligations to being. Of course, we accept India as a Member which India is entitled and subject immediately be- and we welcome Pakistan, but this precedent cannot fore 15 August 1947, will devolve in accordance be cited in the future as justification in the event with the provisions of this agreement. another State should split up into several States and all of them should ask for automatic admission, "2. (a) Membership of all international organi- thereby depriving the Council of the privilege of mak- zations together with the rights and obligations at- ing recommendations with regard to new Members." taching to such membership, will devolve solely upon the Dominion of India.
Recommended publications
  • The Secret Garden Issue July/August 2017
    THE SECRET GARDEN ISSUE JULY/AUGUST 2017 IAM INFINITY #14 July/August 2017 Smiljana Gavrančić (Serbia) - Editor, Founder & Owner Victor Olliver (UK) - Associate from the Astrological Journal of the AA GB Sharon Knight (UK) - Associate from APAI Frank C. Clifford (UK) - Associate from the London School of Astrology Mandi Lockley (UK) - Associate from the Academy of Astrology UK Wendy Stacey (UK) - Associate from the Mayo School of Astrology and the AA GB Jadranka Ćoić (UK) - Associate from the Astrological Lodge of London Tem Tarriktar (USA) – Associate from The Mountain Astrologer magazine Athan J. Zervas (Greece) – Critique Partner/Associate for Art & Design 2 THE SECRET GARDEN ISSUE JULY/AUGUST 2017 3 THE SECRET GARDEN ISSUE JULY/AUGUST 2017 The iris means different things to different people and cultures. Some of its most common meanings are: Royalty Faith Wisdom Hope Valor Original photo by: Rudolf Ribarz (Austrian painter) – Irises 4 THE SECRET GARDEN ISSUE JULY/AUGUST 2017 www.londonschoolofastrology.co.uk 5 THE SECRET GARDEN ISSUE JULY/AUGUST 2017 CONTENTS 7 – IAM EDITOR‘S LETTER: „Destiny‘s Gate―; Electric Axis in Athens by Smiljana Gavrančić 11 – About Us 13 - Mikhail Gorbachev And Uranus Return In 2014; „The Guardian of Europe― by Smiljana Gavrančić 21 - IAM A GUEST: Roy Gillett & Victor Olliver 29 – IAM A GUEST: Nona Voudouri 34 – IAM A GUEST: Anne Whitaker 38 - The Personal is Political by Wendy Stacey 41 - 2017 August Eclipses forecasting by Rod Chang 48 - T – squares: An Introduction by Frank C. Clifford 57 - Astrology –
    [Show full text]
  • UNRESTRICTED A&6/190 11 November 1947 EAXXXSH ORIGINAZ: KRENCH SIXTH CWMITTEX Drf'j?
    * Unt UNRESTRICTED A&6/190 11 November 1947 EAXXXSH ORIGINAZ: KRENCH SIXTH CWMITTEX DRf'J?TCONVENTION ON GENCCIIE: REFORT OF TEIE ECONOMIC i&ND SOCWL CCUNCIL REPORT AND DI-2JF.TRESOWTION ACOFTEDBY SUB-COMMSTTEE2 ON PRCGRESSIVE lXXELOFM5XT OF IIVIERN1~TIOlWL l2W'AND ITS CODIEICATION Rapportour: Mr, G. K?ECKEl!BEECK (Bel&.um) Curing the ~ccond part of its fbwt rc~u1a.r acaaion, the General kosembly rccoivod a &aft resolution on the crime of genocide, submitted Jointly by the wlop.tS~nu of Cuba; India and I?~XWL (A/FXJR~O). DoclarinG ii1 its resolution of 11 &comber 1346 (96 I) that gcnocidc - a denial 02 the rich-t of oxiotonce of entire hum~angroups - 'was a crime at International law, tho Goiioral Assambly instructed the Economic and Social Council to undortalro the nocooaary studiss with a view to thf: 6ra~i.n~: 'up oi' a drai‘t convention on the crime of;:~enocidc to be submitted to the prosoilt ooosion or the General Assembly. On 28 Mu.~cll l$'/j the Economic and Social Council adopted a rcuolution &oroby it instruck& the. Secretary-General: (a) to undo;.%akc;, with tho assistance of exports in the fields of i;rtornational ra.nd criminal law, the nccossary studios with a view to the drawing up of a drai'f convention in accoi8dancs with the resolution of the General tsaombly; and 04 aftor consultation with the Commit-toe on the Progcssivo DrXulopmcnt; of ~ntornational Law EOQ. its Codification, and, if feasible, the Commission on Human Rights, and af'tor rcfarenco for comments to all Member Governments to submit to the next session
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Transfer of Power and Jawaharlal Nehru Admiral of the Fleet the Earl Mountbatten of Burma KG PC GCB OM GCSI GCIE GCVO DSO FRS
    Reflections on the Transfer of Power and Jawaharlal Nehru Admiral of the Fleet The Earl Mountbatten of Burma KG PC GCB OM GCSI GCIE GCVO DSO FRS Trinity College, University of Cambridge - 14th November 1968. This is the second Nehru Memorial Lecture. At the suggestion of the former President of India the first was given, most appropriately, by the Master of Jawaharlal Nehru’s old College, Trinity. Lord Butler was born in India, the son of a most distinguished member of the Indian Civil Service, who was one of the most successful Governors. As Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for India he was one of those responsible for the truly remarkable 1935 Government of India Act, the Act which I used to speed up the transfer of power. Thus Lord Butler’ ties with India are strong and it not surprising that he gave such an excellent lecture, which has set such a high standard. He dealt faithfully with the life and career of Jawaharlal Nehru from his birth seventy-nine years ago this very day up to 1947. My fellow trustees of the Nehru Memorial Trust have persuaded me to deliver the second lecture. This seemed the occasion to give a connected narrative of the events leading up to the transfer of power in August 1947, and indeed to continue up to June 1948, when I ceased to be India’s first Constitutional Governor-General. It would have been nice to show how Nehru fitted into these events, but in the time available such a task soon proved to be out of the question, so I have deliberately confined myself to recalling the highlights of my Viceroyalty and to assessing Nehru’s relations to the principal men and events at the time, and to general reminiscences of him to illustrate the part he played up to the actual transfer of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Principles of Public Sector Reforms
    Key Principles of Public Sector Reforms Case Studies and Frameworks Key Principles of Public Sector Reforms Case Studies and Frameworks Advance proof copy. The final edition will be available in December 2016. © Commonwealth Secretariat 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publisher. Views and opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author and should in no way be attributed to the institutions to which they are affiliated or to the Commonwealth Secretariat. Wherever possible, the Commonwealth Secretariat uses paper sourced from responsible forests or from sources that minimise a destructive impact on the environment. Printed and published by the Commonwealth Secretariat. Table of contents Table of contents ........................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................... 3 Foreword .................................................................................................. 5 The Key Principles of Public Sector Reform ......................................................... 8 Principle 1. A new pragmatic and results–oriented framework ................................. 12 Case Study 1.1 South Africa. Measuring organisational productivity in the public service: North
    [Show full text]
  • University Archives Inventory
    University Archives Inventory Record Group Number: UR001.03 Title: Burney Lynch Parkinson Presidential Records Date: 1926-1969 Bulk Date: 1932-1952 Extent: 42 boxes Creator: Burney Lynch Parkinson Administrative/Biographical Notes: Burney Lynch Parkinson (1887-1972) was an educator from Lincoln, Tennessee. He received his B.S. from Erskine College in 1909, and rose up the administrative ranks from English teacher in Laurens, South Carolina public schools. He received his M.A. from Peabody College in 1920, and Ph.D. from Peabody in 1926, after which he became president of Presbyterian College in Clinton, SC in 1927. He was employed as Director of Teacher Training, Certification, and Elementary Education at the Alabama Dept. of Education just before coming to MSCW to become president in 1932. In December 1932, the university was re-accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, ending the crisis brought on the purge of faculty under Governor Theodore Bilbo, but appropriations to the university were cut by 54 percent, and faculty and staff were reduced by 33 percent, as enrollment had declined from 1410 in 1929 to 804 in 1932. Parkinson authorized a study of MSCW by Peabody college, ultimately pursuing its recommendations to focus on liberal arts at the cost of its traditional role in industrial, vocational, and technical education. Building projects were kept to a minimum during the Parkinson years. Old Main was restored and named for Mary Calloway in 1938. Franklin Hall was converted to a dorm, and the Whitfield Gymnasium into a student center with the Golden Goose Tearoom inside. Parkinson Hall was constructed in 1951 and named for Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • LESSON 3 India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan G Stan India, Pakistan, and Afghanis
    LESSONLESSON 3 India,India, Pakistan,Pakistan, andand AfghanistanAfghanistan QuickQuick WriteWrite magine this: The year is 1921, and you’re a teenager in school in India. Your land has been Iunder British rule for as long as anyone can remember. You’re starting to hear about independence for India, though, and it sounds like an exciting idea. But what kind of independence? Self-rule within the British Empire? Or complete independence, like what What approach should the Americans got after 1776? British India have taken to independence? Why? India is a vast country—Hindus and Muslims are only two of its mixture of religious and ethnic groups. Could one country possibly be big enough to include everybody? Won’t some groups get lost? Should certain groups be guaranteed a share of seats in Parliament? Maybe two or more smaller countries would make more sense. British India could draw the map so that each territory LearnLearn AboutAbout was pretty clearly Hindu or Muslim and everybody spoke the same language. What do you think is best, • the precolonial history of the Mughals in the Indian and why? subcontinent • the encounter with Europe and the colonial period in the region • the history of the struggle for independence in South Asia • what caused the partition and war between India and Pakistan • how Muslim-Hindu strife affects the politics and economics of South Asia • which groups have struggled for control in Afghanistan and why 176 CHAPTER 2 Asia 75162_C2L3_p176-199_AFJROTC_FINAL.indd 176 11/9/09 1:55 PM The Precolonial History of the Mughals VocabularyVoca bulary in the Indian Subcontinent •Indian subcontinent You read briefl y in the Introduction about the Mughal Empire •aristocrat in the Indian subcontinent.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Coding Units
    INSTITUTE Country Coding Units v11.1 - March 2021 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2021. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v11.1” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this ven- ture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/ funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) .
    [Show full text]
  • Birth of a Tragedy Kashmir 1947
    A TRAGEDY MIR BIRTH OF A TRAGEDY KASHMIR 1947 Alastair Lamb Roxford Books Hertingfordbury 1994 O Alastair Lamb, 1994 The right of Alastair Lamb to be identified as the Author of the Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published in 1994 by Roxford Books, Hertingfordbury, Hertfordshire, U.K. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of the publishers. ISBN 0 907129 07 2 Printed in England by Redwood Books, Trowbridge, Wiltshire Typeset by Create Publishing Services Ltd, Bath, Avon Contents Acknowledgements vii I Paramountcy and Partition, March to August 1947 1 1. Introductory 1 2. Paramountcy 4 3. Partition: its origins 13 4. Partition: the Radcliffe Commission 24 5. Jammu & Kashmir and the lapse of Paramountcy 42 I1 The Poonch Revolt, origins to 24 October 1947 54 I11 The Accession Crisis, 24-27 October 1947 81 IV The War in Kashmir, October to December 1947 104 V To the United Nations, October 1947 to 1 January 1948 1 26 VI The Birth of a Tragedy 165 Maps 1. The State of Jammu & Kashmir in relation to its neighbours. ix 2. The State ofJammu & Kashmir. x 3. Stages in the creation of the State ofJammu and Kashmir. xi 4. The Vale of Kashmir. xii ... 5. Partition boundaries in the Punjab, 1947. xlll Acknowledgements ince the publication of my Karhmir. A Disputed Legmy 1846-1990 in S199 1, I have been able to carry out further research into the minutiae of those events of 1947 which resulted in the end ofthe British Indian Empire, the Partition of the Punjab and Bengal and the creation of Pakistan, and the opening stages of the Kashmir dispute the consequences of which are with us still.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Vernacularization of South Asian Languages
    LLanguageanguage EEndangermentndangerment andand PPreservationreservation inin SSouthouth AAsiasia ed. by Hugo C. Cardoso Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 7 Language Endangerment and Preservation in South Asia ed. by Hugo C. Cardoso Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 7 PUBLISHED AS A SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF LANGUAGE DOCUMENTATION & CONSERVATION LANGUAGE ENDANGERMENT AND PRESERVATION IN SOUTH ASIA Special Publication No. 7 (January 2014) ed. by Hugo C. Cardoso LANGUAGE DOCUMENTATION & CONSERVATION Department of Linguistics, UHM Moore Hall 569 1890 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 USA http:/nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI’I PRESS 2840 Kolowalu Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822-1888 USA © All text and images are copyright to the authors, 2014 Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License ISBN 978-0-9856211-4-8 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4607 Contents Contributors iii Foreword 1 Hugo C. Cardoso 1 Death by other means: Neo-vernacularization of South Asian 3 languages E. Annamalai 2 Majority language death 19 Liudmila V. Khokhlova 3 Ahom and Tangsa: Case studies of language maintenance and 46 loss in North East India Stephen Morey 4 Script as a potential demarcator and stabilizer of languages in 78 South Asia Carmen Brandt 5 The lifecycle of Sri Lanka Malay 100 Umberto Ansaldo & Lisa Lim LANGUAGE ENDANGERMENT AND PRESERVATION IN SOUTH ASIA iii CONTRIBUTORS E. ANNAMALAI ([email protected]) is director emeritus of the Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore (India). He was chair of Terralingua, a non-profit organization to promote bi-cultural diversity and a panel member of the Endangered Languages Documentation Project, London.
    [Show full text]
  • United Notions S/646 15 January 1948
    United Notions S/646 15 January 1948 . sir, I h.cva the honour to forward the PollowinS docuuants: Document - I beinng l?akistmts reply to the complaint preferred by India q?Anst Palsistan under Articla 35 of the Charter of the Unitad Eotions. Document - ii a stota;l?ent oi' dispute8 which have arisen between In&c snd Pakistan and which ara likely to endanger the nzintemnce of international peace ,and order, Pakistan being a Zember of the United H&ions has the honour to bring these to the attention of the Sacurity Council under Article 35 of the Charter of the United Xetions. lhxment - III which contains a stztemnt of the particulars of Pa!cist.an's case with refarence to both the mtters dealt with ir. Documents I and II. 2. It is requested that these docwxents my be placed before tha Security Council si?d that the Security Council my be requested to deal with tha conplzinz r&erred to in Document II 2t the earliest Gossible data. It is f-mther requested that all action required by the rules in conaaction with : :i : thase Documents may kindly be takan es early as possible. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your .raost obedient servent, Llinister of PoreiSn Affairs, Govermient of FoEsten 1. The &verqment of India have under Article 35 of the Charter of the . gnit& ~&ions, brought to the notice of the Security Council the existance of a situation between India and Pakistan in which the maintenance Of international peace an6 security is likely to be endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations
    United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law CONVENTION ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE UNITED NATIONS At the United Nations Conference on International Organization, held in San Francisco from 25 April to 26 June 1945 (see procedural history of the Charter of the United Nations), the Rapporteur of Technical Committee 2 (Legal Problems) of Commission IV (Judicial Organization) had pointed out that “the possibility is not excluded of a general convention to be submitted to all Members” on the privileges and immunities of the future United Nations Organization (restricted doc. 933 (English) IV/2/42 (2), p. 2). The Executive Committee of the Preparatory Commission (established by the San Francisco Conference to make provisional arrangements for the initiation of the work of the Organization) recommended, in its final report, that the Preparatory Commission refer to the future General Assembly for its consideration a study on privileges and immunities attached to the report (PC/EX/113/Rev.1, Part III, Chapter V, Section 5, p.69 and Appendix in ibid.). The Preparatory Commission remitted this part of the report to its Committee 5 (Legal Committee), which was instructed to “consider and report to the Preparatory Commission on Chapter V of the Report of the Executive Committee and on any proposals or amendments submitted by Delegations on matters falling within the scope of Chapter V” (see Memorandum by the Executive Secretary on the organization of the work of the Second Session of the Preparatory Commission, PC/EX/138/Rev.1, p. 17). Committee 5 held its first meeting on 27 November 1945 (see summary record.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence of a New State Subject : History Lesson
    Emergence of a new state Subject : History Lesson: Emergence of a new state Course Developers Making of the constitution Integration of princely states Dr. Srinath Raghavan Senior Fellow, Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi and Lecturer in Defence Studies, King's College, London And Land reform and beginning of planning Dr. Arupjyoti Saikia Associate Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Language Editor: Swapna Liddle Formating Editor: Ashutosh Kumar 1 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi Emergence of a new state Table of contents Chapter 13: Emergence of a new state 13.1: Making of the constitution 13.2: Integration of princely states 13.3: Land reform and beginning of planning Summary Exercises Glossary Further readings 2 Institute of lifelong learning, University of Delhi Emergence of a new state 13.1: Making of the constitution On 26 January 1950, the Indian constitution came into effect. By this act, the Dominion of India transformed itself into the Republic of India. The constitution had been drafted, discussed, and finalized by the Constituent assembly between December 1946 and December 1949. Comprising 395 articles and 8 schedules, this lengthy document set out the architecture of the new state. The deliberations of the Constituent assembly were comparably long and painstaking. They provide a fascinating window into the range of ideas and institutions that the makers of the constitution envisioned for the new India. But these debates, and the resultant constitution, also reflected the wider context in which the Constituent assembly met and functioned. Figure 13.1.1: India's first President, Rajendra Prasad, is being led to the ‗presidential chair‘ by Governor-General C.
    [Show full text]