DOCSLIB.ORG

Qt8m17f977.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Qt8m17f977.Pdf UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title Phonetics and Phonology of Ikalanga: A Diachronic and Synchronic Study Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8m17f977 Author Mathangwane, Joyce Publication Date 1996 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Phonetics and Phonology of Ikalanga: a diachronic and synchronic study Joyce Thambole Mogatse Mathangwane B.A. (University of Botswana) 1985 M.A. (Leeds University, England) 1988 M.A. (University of California at Berkeley) 1994 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Larry M. Hyman, co-Chair Professor John J. Ohala, co-Chair Professor Sharon Inkelas Professor Alan Timberlake 1996 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. The dissertation of Joyce Thambole Mogatse Mathangwane is approved: 1 Y l* u/ .fe3 . / ? ? £ Date "7 L c£T % N. HU corOhair ' Date Date pm# m Date University of California, Berkeley 1996 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Phonetics and Phonology of Ikalanga: a diachronic and synchronic study Copyright © 1996 b y Joyce Thambole Mogatse Mathangwane Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. To the memory of my mother, Baluki Mathangwane May your soul rest in peace. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Influence of Tswana .................................................................. 5 1.1.1 Vocabulary Borrowing ................................................... 5 1.1.1.1 Lexical Borrowings with Ejectives .................... 6 1.1.1.2 Borrowings with Velar Fricatives ..................... 7 1.1.1.3 Borrowings from other Cultures ....................... 7 1.1.2 Borrowing of the Diminutive Morpheme ...................8 1.1.3 Use of the Lateral /l/ from Proto-Bantu *d ..................10 1.2 Goals and Organization of the Dissertation ............................. 10 1.3 Theoretical Assumptions ............................................................12 1.4 Notations ..................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2: Segment Inventory, Phonotactics, and Selected Aspects of Morphology ...........................................................................21 2.1 Ikalanga Segment Inventory ...................................................... 21 2.1.1 Ikalanga Vowels ............................................................. 22 2.1.2 Ikalanga Consonant Inventory ...................................... 27 2.1.2.1 Plosives ................................................................28 2.1.2.1.1 What Place of Articulation are Ikalanga Apicals? .................................31 2.1.2.2 Affricates............................................................. 35 2.1.2.3 Fricatives ............................................................. 38 2.1.2.4 Sonorants .............................................................39 2.1.2.5 Prenasalized Consonants ....................................39 2.1.2.6 Labialized Consonants ........................................ 48 2.1.2.6.1 Labialized Alveolar Fricatives /sw,z w/ ..................................................49 2.1.2.7 Breathy Voice Consonants ..................................54 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2.2 Distributional Analysis of Ikalanga Inventory ....................... 57 2.2.1. Vowels ............................................................................ 58 2.2.1.1 Vowel / i / ............................................................ 58 2.2.1.2 V ow el/e/ ............................................................59 2.2.1.3 Vowel / a / ............................................................60 2.2.1.4 Vowel / o/ ........................................................... 61 2.2.1.5 Vowel / u / ...........................................................62 2.2.2 Cooccurrence Patterns of Vowels in Stems .................65 2.2.2.1 Vowel Harmony in Verb Stems ........................ 70 2.2.3 Distribution of Ikalanga Consonants ............................75 2.2.3.1 Position in a Syllable ........................................... 75 2.2.3.2 The Aspirates.......................................................76 2.2.3.3 The Apicals..........................................................78 2.2.3.4The Bilabial Approximant / v / .........................79 2.2.3.5 The Doubly Articulated Velarized Stops / pi?, 6g/ .....................................................80 2.2.3.6 Prenasalized Consonants ....................................81 2.23.7 Labialized Consonants ......................................85 2.3 Overview of the Morphology .................................................... 85 2.3.1 Ikalanga Noun Class System .........................................86 2.3.1.1 Class 5 Nouns .................................................... 88 2.3.2 Diminutive Suffix ...........................................................89 2.3.3 Causative Suffix ..............................................................92 2.3.4 Passive Suffix ..................................................................93 2.3.5 Summary........................................................................ 95 Chapter 3: Effects of the Proto-Bantu Close Vowels ...................................96 3.1 Proto-Bantu Inventory ............................................................... 97 3.2 High Vowel Frication in Ikalanga ............................................. 99 3.3 How did the Close Vowels Cause Frication on PB Stops?.... 105 3.4 Affrication in Causative Verbs .................................................. 107 v Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3.5 Typological Evidence from other Bantu Languages ............... 112 3.6 Summary.....................................................................................115 Chapter 4: Palatalization...............................................................................116 4.1 Velar Palatalization .....................................................................117 4.2 Palatalization in Diminutives .................................................... 120 4.2.1 Palatalization of the Lateral .......................................... 121 4.2.2 Palatalization of the Nasals ..........................................126 4.2.3 Palatalization of Labials .................................................127 4.3 Typological Evidence of Palatalization ..................................... 133 4.4 Summary.....................................................................................134 Chapter 5: Velarization.................................................................................135 5.1 What is Velarization?................................................................. 136 5.2 Velarization in Ikalanga ............................................................. 140 5.3 Velarization in Other Bantu Languages ....................................145 5.4 Acoustic Analysis of the Doubly Articulated Stops ................ 148 5.5 Velarized Consonants as Single Segments ............................... 155 5.6 Diachronic Velarization ............................................................. 157 5.6.1 Velarization of Bilabials ................................................ 158 5.6.2 Velarization of Apicals ..................................................163 5.6.3 Velarization of the Nasals .............................................169 5.6.4 Secondary Labialization in / kw, qgw, / .....................170 5.7 Phonetic Evidence why /w / Causes Velarization ...................174 5.8 Typological Evidence from other Languages ...........................175 5.9 Synchronic Velarization ............................................................. 179 5.9.1 Velarization in Verb Passivization .............................. 179 5.9.2 Velarization in Diminutives .........................................185 5.9.3 Velarization in Agreement Markers ............................192 5.10 Summary.....................................................................................193 vi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Chapter 6: Aspiration and its Effects ............................................................194 6.1 Aspiration in Ikalanga ................................................................195 6.2 Acoustic Analysis of the Breathy Aspirates..............................198 6.3 Breathy Aspirates as Depressor Consonants.............................201 6.4 Diachronic Analysis ....................................................................204 6.4.1 Influence of the Close Vowels *i andt *u <.....................204 6.4.1.1 Phonetic Evidence of how Close Vowels Effected Aspiration on PB *t ............................... 208 6.4.2 Aspiration from the Labio-Velar Glide / w / ................. 209 6.4.2.1 How the Labio-Velar Glide Effected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phonological Processes
    Phonological Processes Phonological processes are patterns of articulation that are developmentally appropriate in children learning to speak up until the ages listed below. PHONOLOGICAL PROCESS DESCRIPTION AGE ACQUIRED Initial Consonant Deletion Omitting first consonant (hat → at) Consonant Cluster Deletion Omitting both consonants of a consonant cluster (stop → op) 2 yrs. Reduplication Repeating syllables (water → wawa) Final Consonant Deletion Omitting a singleton consonant at the end of a word (nose → no) Unstressed Syllable Deletion Omitting a weak syllable (banana → nana) 3 yrs. Affrication Substituting an affricate for a nonaffricate (sheep → cheep) Stopping /f/ Substituting a stop for /f/ (fish → tish) Assimilation Changing a phoneme so it takes on a characteristic of another sound (bed → beb, yellow → lellow) 3 - 4 yrs. Velar Fronting Substituting a front sound for a back sound (cat → tat, gum → dum) Backing Substituting a back sound for a front sound (tap → cap) 4 - 5 yrs. Deaffrication Substituting an affricate with a continuant or stop (chip → sip) 4 yrs. Consonant Cluster Reduction (without /s/) Omitting one or more consonants in a sequence of consonants (grape → gape) Depalatalization of Final Singles Substituting a nonpalatal for a palatal sound at the end of a word (dish → dit) 4 - 6 yrs. Stopping of /s/ Substituting a stop sound for /s/ (sap → tap) 3 ½ - 5 yrs. Depalatalization of Initial Singles Substituting a nonpalatal for a palatal sound at the beginning of a word (shy → ty) Consonant Cluster Reduction (with /s/) Omitting one or more consonants in a sequence of consonants (step → tep) Alveolarization Substituting an alveolar for a nonalveolar sound (chew → too) 5 yrs.
    [Show full text]
  • A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary
    S. L. Nikolayev S. A. Starostin A NORTH CAUCASIAN ETYMOLOGICAL DICTIONARY Edited by S. A. Starostin ***************** ****************ASTERISK PUBLISHERS * Moscow * 1994 The two volumes contain a systematic reconstruction of the phonology and vocabulary of Proto-North-Caucasian - the ancestor of numerous modern languages of the Northern Caucasus, as well as of some extinct languages of ancient Anatolia. Created by two leading Russian specialists in linguistic prehistory, the book will be valuable for all specialists in comparative linguistics and history of ancient Near East and Europe. © S. L. Nikolayev, S. A. Starostin 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor' s foreword. , . Preface List of abbreviations Literature I ntr oduct ion Dictionary ? . 200 9 . 236 5 . , . ..............242 a' i ... ' 252 a ............. 275 b ...... 285 c 322 c 3 3 L t ^39 C 352 £ 376 : 381 d 397 e 409 4 2 5 Y 474 B 477 h 48 5 h 5 00 h 5 0 3 H 342 i 625 i 669 j '. 6 7 3 k. 68 7 fc 715 I 7 4 2 1 : .... 7 5 4 X. ! 7 5 8 X ; 766 X 7 7 3 L 7 86 t. ' 7 87 n 844 o. 859 p. 865 p. 878 q . 882 q 907 r. ..... 943 s... i 958 s. 973 S. 980 t . 990 t 995 ft. ...... 1009 u 1010 u 1013 V 1016 w. 1039 x 1060 X. ........ 1067 z. ... 1084 z 1086 2. 1089 3 1 090 3 1101 5 1105 I ndices. 1111 5 EDITOR'S FOREWORD This dictionary has a long history. The idea of composing it was already ripe in 1979, and the basic cardfiles were composed in 1980-1983, during long winter months of our collaboration with S.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Beatboxing : a Preliminary Study on Temporal Reduction
    Human Beatboxing : A preliminary study on temporal reduction. Alexis Dehais Underdown1, Paul Vignes1, Lise Crevier Buchman1,2 & Didier Demolin1 1 Laboratoire de Phonétique et Phonologie (Sorbonne Nouvelle / CNRS), 2 Hopital Foch, Univ. VSQ. [email protected] 1. Introduction Speech rate is known to be a factor of reduction affecting supralaryngeal gestures [4] [6] [1] and laryngeal gestures [5] depending on the prosodic structure [3]. An acoustic study [2] showed that beatboxing rate has articulatory effects on hi-hats in medial and final positions but that the overall production was not found to be affected. In the present study we are presenting an experiment based on a beatboxing speeding up paradigm. We used a single metric and rhythmical pattern to create various beatboxed patterns (BP). Human Beatboxing (HBB) seems to rely on different articulatory skills than speech because it does not obey to linguistic constraints. How do beatboxing rate affect sound duration ? We expect that (1) the faster the production, the shorter sound duration (2) affricates, trills and fricatives will shorten more than stops (3) position in the pattern influences sound reduction. 2. Methods A 32 y.o. professional beatboxer took part in the experiment. The recorded material was controlled in terms of sound pattern and rhythm. Indeed, to facilitate the comparison of beatboxing recordings we used only one metric pattern that we transposed into 12 Beatbox patterns (BP). Table 1 shows an example of two of the 12 BP created for the study. There is only one voiced sound (i.e. [ɓ]) in the corpus. Table 1 : Example of the structure of a Beatboxed Pattern Metric Rhythm Low High Long High Low Low High Long High Positions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BP1 [p’] [͡ts’] [↓k͡ L̥ ] [͡ts’] [p’] [p’] [͡ts’] [↓k͡ L̥ ] [͡ts’] BP2 [↓ʙ̥ ˡ] [͡ts’] [ʡhə̥ ] [͡ts’] [↓p] [↓ʙ̥ ˡ] [͡ts’] [ʡhə̥ ] [͡ts’] Concerning the rhythm, it was controlled using a vibrating metronome placed on his wrist.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments of the Lateral in Occitan Dialects and Their Romance and Cross-Linguistic Context Daniela Müller
    Developments of the lateral in occitan dialects and their romance and cross-linguistic context Daniela Müller To cite this version: Daniela Müller. Developments of the lateral in occitan dialects and their romance and cross- linguistic context. Linguistics. Université Toulouse le Mirail - Toulouse II, 2011. English. NNT : 2011TOU20122. tel-00674530 HAL Id: tel-00674530 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00674530 Submitted on 27 Feb 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. en vue de l’obtention du DOCTORATDEL’UNIVERSITÉDETOULOUSE délivré par l’université de toulouse 2 - le mirail discipline: sciences du langage zur erlangung der doktorwürde DERNEUPHILOLOGISCHENFAKULTÄT DERRUPRECHT-KARLS-UNIVERSITÄTHEIDELBERG présentée et soutenue par vorgelegt von DANIELAMÜLLER DEVELOPMENTS OF THE LATERAL IN OCCITAN DIALECTS ANDTHEIRROMANCEANDCROSS-LINGUISTICCONTEXT JURY Jonathan Harrington (Professor, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) Francesc Xavier Lamuela (Catedràtic, Universitat de Girona) Jean-Léonard Léonard (Maître de conférences HDR, Paris
    [Show full text]
  • Segmental Phonology Darin Howe University of Calgary
    SEGMENTAL PHONOLOGY DARIN HOWE HOWED UCALGARY.CA UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY DARIN HOWE, 2003 ii Table of contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................................................IV INTERNATIONAL PHONETIC ALPHABET CHART.................................................................................................. V 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................1 2. INTRASEGMENTAL PHONOLOGY ..................................................................................................................4 2.1. PHONEME INVENTORIES AND FEATURES.......................................................................................................... 4 2.2. ARTICULATOR-FREE FEATURES .....................................................................................................................12 2.2.1. Major class features .................................................................................................................................................12 2.2.1.1. [±consonantal]...........................................................................................................................................12 2.2.1.2. [±sonorant].................................................................................................................................................22 2.2.2. Other articulator-free features..............................................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Arabic and English Consonants: a Phonetic and Phonological Investigation
    Advances in Language and Literary Studies ISSN: 2203-4714 Vol. 6 No. 6; December 2015 Flourishing Creativity & Literacy Australian International Academic Centre, Australia Arabic and English Consonants: A Phonetic and Phonological Investigation Mohammed Shariq College of Science and Arts, Methnab, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia E-mail: [email protected] Doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.6p.146 Received: 18/07/2015 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.6p.146 Accepted: 15/09/2015 Abstract This paper is an attempt to investigate the actual pronunciation of the consonants of Arabic and English with the help of phonetic and phonological tools like manner of the articulation, point of articulation, and their distribution at different positions in Arabic and English words. A phonetic and phonological analysis of the consonants of Arabic and English can be useful in overcoming the hindrances that confront the Arab EFL learners. The larger aim is to bring about pedagogical changes that can go a long way in improving pronunciation and ensuring the occurrence of desirable learning outcomes. Keywords: Phonetics, Phonology, Pronunciation, Arabic Consonants, English Consonants, Manner of articulation, Point of articulation 1. Introduction Cannorn (1967) and Ekundare (1993) define phonetics as sounds which is the basis of human speech as an acoustic phenomenon. It has a source of vibration somewhere in the vocal apparatus. According to Varshney (1995), Phonetics is the scientific study of the production, transmission and reception of speech sounds. It studies the medium of spoken language. On the other hand, Phonology concerns itself with the evolution, analysis, arrangement and description of the phonemes or meaningful sounds of a language (Ramamurthi, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Uu Clicks Correlate with Phonotactic Patterns Amanda L. Miller
    Tongue body and tongue root shape differences in N|uu clicks correlate with phonotactic patterns Amanda L. Miller 1. Introduction There is a phonological constraint, known as the Back Vowel Constraint (BVC), found in most Khoesan languages, which provides information as to the phonological patterning of clicks. BVC patterns found in N|uu, the last remaining member of the !Ui branch of the Tuu family spoken in South Africa, have never been described, as the language only had very preliminary documentation undertaken by Doke (1936) and Westphal (1953–1957). In this paper, I provide a description of the BVC in N|uu, based on lexico-statistical patterns found in a database that I developed. I also provide results of an ultrasound study designed to investigate posterior place of articulation differences among clicks. Click consonants have two constrictions, one anterior, and one posterior. Thus, they have two places of articulation. Phoneticians since Doke (1923) and Beach (1938) have described the posterior place of articulation of plain clicks as velar, and the airstream involved in their production as velaric. Thus, the anterior place of articulation was thought to be the only phonetic property that differed among the various clicks. The ultrasound results reported here and in Miller, Brugman et al. (2009) show that there are differences in the posterior constrictions as well. Namely, tongue body and tongue root shape differences are found among clicks. I propose that differences in tongue body and tongue root shape may be the phonetic bases of the BVC. The airstream involved in click production is described as velaric airstream by earlier researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • An Electropalatographic and Acoustic Study of Affricates and Fricatives in Two Catalan Dialects
    An electropalatographic and acoustic study of affricates and fricatives in two Catalan dialects Daniel Recasens Universitat Autonoma` de Barcelona & Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona [email protected] Aina Espinosa Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona The present study is an electropalatographic and acoustic investigation of the fricatives /s, S/ and the affricates /ts, dz, tS, dZ/ based on data from five speakers of Majorcan Catalan and five speakers of Valencian Catalan. Results show that the articulatory characteristics of fricatives and affricates agree in several respects: the sounds traditionally labeled /S/ and /tS, dZ/ are alveolopalatal, and are articulated at a less anterior location, are less constricted and show more dorsopalatal contact than the alveolars /s/ and /ts, dz/; the two place categories are closer to each other in Valencian than in Majorcan. Compared to voiceless affricates, voiced affricates are more anterior and more constricted, and show less dorsopalatal contact. Data also show that closure location for /tS, dZ/ occurs at the alveolar zone, and that articulatory differences among affricates are better specified at frication than at closure. Strict homorganicity between the stop and frication components of affricates appears to hold provided that constriction location at frication is compared with place of articulation at closure offset. In comparison to voiceless affricates, voiced affricates were shorter, and exhibited a longer closure and a shorter frication period, in Majorcan; in Valencian, on the other hand, closures were shortest for /dZ/, and frication was systematically longer for voiceless vs. voiced affricates. These duration data appear to conform to a universal trend in Valencian but not in Majorcan where voiced affricates are lengthened intentionally.
    [Show full text]
  • Websites for IPA Practice
    IPA review Websites for IPA practice • http://languageinstinct.blogspot.com/2006/10/stress-timed-rhythm-of-english.html • http://ipa.typeit.org/ • http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/phonetics.html • http://phonetics.ucla.edu/vowels/contents.html • http://accent.gmu.edu/browse_language.php • http://isg.urv.es/sociolinguistics/varieties/index.html • http://www.uiowa.edu/~acadtech/phonetics/english/frameset.html • http://usefulenglish.ru/phonetics/practice-vowel-contrast • http://www.unc.edu/~jlsmith/pht-url.html#(0) • http://www.agendaweb.org/phonetic.html • http://www.anglistik.uni-bonn.de/samgram/phonprac.htm • http://www.mnsu.edu/comdis/phonetics/phonetics.html • http://www.englishexercises.org/makeagame/viewgame.asp?id=4767 • http://www.tedpower.co.uk/phonetics.htm • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_perception • http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/changing-voices/ • http://www.mta.ca/faculty/arts-letters/mll/linguistics/exercises/index.html#phono • http://cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba/phon/weeklypractice.html • http://amyrey.web.unc.edu/classes/ling-101-online/practice/phonology-practice/ Articulatory description of consonant sounds • State of glottis (voiced or voiceless) • Place of articulation (bilabial, alveolar, etc.) • Manner of articulation (stop, fricative, etc.) Bilabial [p] pit [b] bit [m] mit [w] wit Labiodental [f] fan [v] van Interdental “th” [θ] thigh [ð] thy Alveolar [t] tip [d] dip [s] sip [z] zip [n] nip [l] lip [ɹ] rip Alveopalatal [tʃ] chin [dʒ] gin [ʃ] shin [ʒ] azure Palatal [j] yes Velar [k] call [g] guy [ŋ] sing
    [Show full text]
  • Perception of Native and Non-Native Affricate-Fricative Contrasts: Cross-Language Tests on Adults and Infants
    Perception of native and non-native affricate-fricative contrasts: Cross-language tests on adults and infants ͒ Feng-Ming Tsaoa Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 106 Taiwan, Republic of China Huei-Mei Liu Department of Special Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan, Republic of China Patricia K. Kuhl Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, USA ͑Received 19 September 2005; revised 25 July 2006; accepted 26 July 2006͒ Previous studies have shown improved sensitivity to native-language contrasts and reduced sensitivity to non-native phonetic contrasts when comparing 6–8 and 10–12-month-old infants. This developmental pattern is interpreted as reflecting the onset of language-specific processing around the first birthday. However, generalization of this finding is limited by the fact that studies have yielded inconsistent results and that insufficient numbers of phonetic contrasts have been tested developmentally; this is especially true for native-language phonetic contrasts. Three experiments assessed the effects of language experience on affricate-fricative contrasts in a cross-language study of English and Mandarin adults and infants. Experiment 1 showed that English-speaking adults score lower than Mandarin-speaking adults on Mandarin alveolo-palatal affricate-fricative discrimination. Experiment 2 examined developmental change in the discrimination of this contrast in English- and Mandarin-leaning infants between 6 and 12 months of age. The results demonstrated that native-language performance significantly improved with age while performance on the non-native contrast decreased. Experiment 3 replicated the perceptual improvement for a native contrast: 6–8 and 10–12-month-old English-learning infants showed a performance increase at the older age.
    [Show full text]
  • Consonants ROACH
    THE PHONEME 1. The phoneme When we speak, we produce a continuous stream of sounds. In studying speech we divide this stream into small pieces that we call segments . The word ‘man’ is pronounced with a first segment mmm, a second segment æææ and a third segment nnn. Just as there is an abstract alphabet as the basis of our writing, so there is an abstract set of units as the basis of our speech. These units are called phonemes , and the complete set of these units is called the phonemic system of the language. Free variation & complementary distribution The phonemes themselves are abstract, but there are many slightly different ways in which we make the sounds that represent these phonemes, just as there are many ways in which we may make a mark on a piece of paper to represent a particular (abstract) letter of the alphabet. Whenever we hear, for example, two different ways of making a bbb, we speak of two different realisations of the phoneme. Since one can be substituted for the other without changing the meaning; the two realisations are said to be in free variation . On another hand, when we talk about different realisations of phonemes, we sometimes call these realisations allophones . For example, we find that the realisation of ttt in the word ‘tea’ is aspirated (as are all voiceless plosives when they occur before stressed vowels at the beginning of syllables). In the word ‘eat’, the realisation of ttt is unaspirated (as are all voiceless plosives when they occur at the end of a syllable and are not followed by a vowel).
    [Show full text]
  • A Contrastive Analysis of English and Bangla Phonemics 19 20 Dr
    A contrastive analysis of English and Bangla phonemics 19 20 Dr. Binoy Barman The Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics: Vol. 2 No.4 August 2009 phonemes. (Ladefoged 2001: 23) Phonemes are screened from Page: 19-42, Published on August 2010 by the Registrar, Dhaka University minimal pair, in which two sequences of sounds are similar in all ISSN-2075-3098 segments except one. A phoneme is characterised by certain distinctive features which make it a separate entity in a set of sounds available in a language. Phonemics discusses the properties of A contrastive analysis of English and phonemes in relation to a language. So it is in close connection with phonetics and phonology, the former focusing on the pronunciation Bangla phonemics of sounds and the latter on the arrangement of sounds. According to Odden (2005: 2), phonetics deals with actual sounds while 1 Dr. Binoy Barman phonology with the cognitive aspects of sounds. Phonemes come to be the symbolic representation of sounds, interacting both with 1. Assistant Professor and Head, Department of English, Daffodil phonetics and phonology. Phonemics provides them with the International University Email : [email protected] foundational raw materials for disciplinary study. Fries (1967: 181) says, “Phonemics is a set of techniques by which to determine for Abstract a particular language which phonetic features form bundles of functioning contrasts to identify the word-patterns of that Contrastive phonemics is the field of study in which different language.” phonemic systems are laid side by side to find out similarities and dissimilarities between the phonemes of the languages concerned. Every language has its own phonemic system, which holds unique as well as common features.
    [Show full text]