DOCSLIB.ORG

01 England 1791-1809

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 BYRON’S CORRESPONDENCE AND JOURNALS 01: FROM NEWSTEAD, SOUTHWELL, AND OTHER PLACES IN ENGLAND: NOVEMBER 1799-JULY 1809 Edited by Peter Cochran Work in progress, with frequent updates [indicated]. Letters not in the seventeen main files may be found in those containing the correspondences Byron / Annabella, Byron / Murray, Byron / Hobhouse, Byron / Moore, Byron / Scott, Byron / Kinnaird, Byron / The Shelleys , or Byron / Hoppner . UPDATED June 21st 2012. My thanks to Paul Curtis and Ralph Lloyd-Jones for the additional material. Abbreviations: B.: Byron. S.: Southey. 1922: Lord Byron’s Correspondence Chiefly with Lady Melbourne, Mr Hobhouse, The Hon. Douglas Kinnaird, and P.B.Shelley (2 vols., John Murray 1922). BLJ: Byron, George Gordon, Lord. Byron’s Letters and Journals . Ed. Leslie A. Marchand, 13 vols. London: John Murray 1973–94. CMP: Lord Byron: The Complete Miscellaneous Prose . Ed. Andrew Nicholson, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. CSS: The Life and Correspondence of the Late Robert Southey , ed. C.C.Southey, Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 6 vols 1849-1850. Curry: New Letters of Robert Southey , Ed. Kenneth Curry, 2 vols. Columbia 1965. LJ: The Works of Lord Byron, Letters and Journals . Ed. R. E. Prothero, 6 vols. London: John Murray, 1899-1904. I am very grateful to John and Virginia Murray for permission to quote texts from Byron’s Letters and Journals , ed. Leslie A. Marchand (John Murray 1973-1994). NLS: National Library of Scotland. Q: Byron: A Self-Portrait; Letters and Diaries 1798 to 1824 . Ed. Peter Quennell, 2 vols, John Murray, 1950. READER! This edition gives you a raw version of Byron’s correspondence. As far as can be done in linear print, it conveys what he wrote and how he wrote it, before any editor got to it to neutralise him. FEEL FREE TO MAKE IT MORE ACCOMMODATING BY EDITING IT YOURSELF. Once you’ve shaded and copied it, you can: run through his page-breaks; expand his contractions and ampersands; delete his deletions; regularise his interlineations … would you? dare you? modernise his spelling? (I hope not!); regularise his capitalisation, so that students feel less bewildered than usual? (I hope not!) – P.C. POSTAGE The recipient, not the sender, normally paid the postage: but as a peer, Byron used a frank, so in England his recipients got his letters free. However, I believe several of his “letters” to Murray from St James’s Street, the Albany, or Piccadilly Terrace, are notes taken round by servants (as are those of Murray to him). He does not have the franking privilege when abroad, and as the cost of postage is calculated by weight, he only uses an envelope when he is enclosing a manuscript. The address is written on side four, the sheet is folded and the wax stamped (“wafered”), and then Fletcher takes it to the post office. 2 A letter from Byron is usually a bifolium, with the following shape: Sheet 1 side 4: Sheet 1 side 1: Text continued from side 3, above address Address and Date Salutation AD DR TEXT ES S [written at right angles ] Text continued below address Signature [ sometimes ] Sheet 1 side 2: Sheet 1 side 3: TEXT TEXT Signature [ sometimes ] P.S. [ sometimes ] Sometimes the letter goes on to a second or even third sheet, which is either enclosed in the first bifolium, or placed at last in an envelope. The longest Byron letter that I have encountered so far is the one to John Murray, from Ravenna, August 1st 1819, which is on five sheets. If he has too little paper to write all that he wants, Byron writes around the margin of side 3, starting at the bottom right-hand corner, curling up the right-hand side, and sometimes continuing inverted across the top and down the left-hand side. Sometimes he adds messages parallel to the address, either above it or below. I have always indicated these things. Not all letters from Byron are the linear communications previous editors have seemed to indicate, but contain several discrete bundles of text in different places and at different angles. If Byron leaves much of a letter blank, it’s often a sign that he’s angry with his addressee. Codes: Names of writer and recipient are in bold type, with location from which sent, and date. (Source is given in round brackets beneath the title: “text from” indicates that the actual source has been seen. For “LJ”, “1922”, and “BLJ”, see above). Where the manuscript is the source, the text is left-justified only. Where the source is a book, the text is left- and right-justified. [The address, if there is one, is given in square brackets beneath the source] “1:2” and so on indicates a page-turn on the bifolium. “1:2 and 1:3 blank” shows that not all the paper has been used. If Byron goes on to a second bifolium, or a second sheet, it’s an occasion. The address, if there is no envelope, is normally in the centre of 1:4. <Authorial deletion> <xxxxx> Irrecoverable authorial deletion <deleted> Infra-red and ultra-violet might reveal something interesting {Interlineated word or phrase} E[ditoria]l A[dditio]n [ ] Illegible Hyphens: where Byron has split a word over two sides, and used a double hyphen, the effect has been re= / =tained. But, as the text is not transcribed on a line-for-line basis (except in the case of Susan Vaughan’s letters (for reasons explained at January 12th 1812), hyphens are not used when he splits a word over two lines. See April 3rd 1819 for another letter transcribed line-for-line. 3 Underlining: sometimes Byron underlines a whole word, sometimes single syllables (for comical effect, as in “Quarterlyers”), sometimes an entire phrase, and sometimes part of a word (from haste). In all cases except the last, where the whole word is underlined, we have tried to keep to his usage, underlining with a single understroke, with two understrokes, with a heavy underlining, or with a decorative line. Signatures: As time goes on, Byron’s signature becomes less careful, but then recovers. Few of his ways of signing off can be conveyed in print. “Byron” indicates a word whose second syllable is both underlined and overlined. “BN” indicates those two letters with different degrees of dash-decoration around them. Sometimes they appear Greek. “[ swirl signature ]” indicates a bird’s-nest effect which can with charity be read as a capital “B”. “[ scrawl ]” is a long wavy line, often starting as “y rs ” but with no other letters decipherable. After the death of Lady Noel, Byron regains pride in his name, and often signs “N. B.” with a decorative underlining. Byron’s Most Important Correspondents in this Section Augusta Byron, later Augusta Leigh (1783-1851) Byron’s half-sister; the most important woman in his life Catherine Gordon Byron (1765-1811), Byron’s mother Charles Skinner Matthews (17??-1811), gay Cambridge friend of Byron Edward Noel Long (17??-1808), another of Byron’s close friends at Harrow Elizabeth Pigot (1783-1866), Byron’s friend and neighbour at Southwell John Cam Hobhouse (1786-1869) soon to be Byron’s travelling companion Francis Hodgson (1781-1852), Cambridge friend of Byron Gentleman John Jackson (1769-1845), heavyweight champion of England, Byron’s boxing instructor Henry Angelo (17??-18??), fencing instructor to the Navy, Byron’s fencing instructor, associate of John Jackson Henry Drury (1778-1841), another Harrow friend of Byron John Cam Hobhouse (1786-1869), Byron’s close friend and future travelling companion John Hanson (1755-1841), Byron’s solicitor and surrogate father John Leacroft (17??-18??), a neighbour of Byron’s in Southwell whose sister Byron may have compromised John Pigot (17??-18??), Elizabeth’s brother Robert Charles Dallas (1754-1824), Byron’s early literary adviser, who introduces him to John Murray in Section 03 Robert Southey (1774-1842), poet, to become the person Byron hated most (apart from Lady Byron) Scrope Berdmore Davies (1782-1852), close Cambridge friend of Byron who lends him money for his Mediterranean travels The Earl of Clare (1792-1851), one of Byron’s most beloved friends at Harrow The Marquis of Sligo (1788-1845), Cambridge friend of Byron William Bankes (1786-1855), Cambridge friend of Byron William Harness (17??-18??), younger Harrow protégée of Byron INDEX: 186 letters. 1788 onwards Catherine Gordon Byron to Frances Leigh, from Aberdeen, May 5th 1791 Catherine Gordon Byron to Frances Leigh, from Aberdeen, November 29th 1792 Selections from the 1790s correspondence of Robert Southey Byron to Mrs Parker, from Newstead Abbey, November 8th 1798 Byron to Mrs Catherine Gordon Byron, from Nottingham, March 13th 1799 Byron to John Hanson, from Dulwich, November 1799 From the correspondence of Robert Southey, 1800-1806 4 1803 Byron to Catherine Gordon Byron, from Harrow, May 1st 1803 Byron to Catherine Gordon Byron, from Harrow, June 23rd-30th 1803 Byron to Catherine Gordon Byron, from Newstead Abbey, September 1803 1804 Byron to Augusta Byron, from Burgage Manor, Southwell, March 22nd 1804 Byron to Augusta Byron, from Burgage Manor, Southwell, March 26th 1804 Byron to Augusta Byron, from Burgage Manor, Southwell, April 2nd 1804 Byron to Augusta Byron, from Burgage Manor, Southwell, April 9th 1804 Byron to Catherine Gordon Byron, from Harrow, May 1st–10th 1804 Catherine Gordon Byron to Miss Abercromby, from Nottingham, July 2nd 1804 Byron to John Hanson, from Harrow, July 17th 1804 Byron to Elizabeth Pigot, from Burgage Manor, Southwell, August 29th 1804 Byron to John Hanson, from Burgage Manor, Southwell, August 30th 1804 Byron to Augusta Byron, from Harrow, October 25th 1804 Byron to Augusta Byron, from Harrow, November 2nd 1804 Byron to
Recommended publications
  • 1 in Search of Robert Lovell: Poet and Pantisocrat I. Introduction 'At The

    1 in Search of Robert Lovell: Poet and Pantisocrat I. Introduction 'At The

    In Search of Robert Lovell: Poet and Pantisocrat I. Introduction ‘At the close of the year 1794, a clever young man, of the Society of Friends, of the name of Robert Lovell, who had married a Miss Fricker, informed me that a few friends of his from Oxford and Cambridge, with himself, were about to sail to America, and, on the banks of the Susquehannah, to form a Social Colony, in which there was to be a community of property, and where all that was selfish was to be proscribed.’1 Thus wrote Bristol publisher Joseph Cottle in his Reminiscences published in 1847. As any serious student of Romanticism knows, the most important of those ‘few friends’ mentioned by Cottle were Robert Southey and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who were then gathering support for a small-scale transatlantic emigration scheme founded on radical egalitarian or so-called ‘Pantisocratic’ principles. It is chiefly in connection with this utopian venture that the ‘clever young man’ described by Cottle has, until now, typically featured in Romantic criticism, very much in a supporting if not peripheral role. But how much do we know about Robert Lovell? What kind of person was he? Why did Southey, and subsequently Coleridge, embrace him enthusiastically on first acquaintance and later downgrade their estimate of his qualities? What was Lovell’s achievement as a poet, and what was his place in the early history of Romanticism in the South West? In this essay I attempt to answer these questions by re- examining established ‘facts’, gathering fresh evidence, and treating Lovell and his poetry as valid subjects in their own right rather than as a footnote to the budding careers of Coleridge and Southey.
  • Saving Sarah Fricker: Accurately Representing the Realities of the Coleridges’ Marriage

    Saving Sarah Fricker: Accurately Representing the Realities of the Coleridges’ Marriage

    Saving Sarah Fricker: Accurately Representing the Realities of the Coleridges’ Marriage Saving Sarah Fricker: Accurately Representing the Realities of the Coleridges’ Marriage Cori Mathis Abstract The Lake Poets circle was prolific; they wrote letters to each other constantly, leaving a clear picture of the beginning and eventual decline of the marriage between Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Sarah Fricker Coleridge. Coleridge also was fond of chronicling his personal life in his work. Coleridge’s poetry and prose clearly show that, though he may have come to regret it, he originally married Sarah Fricker for love and was very happy in the beginning of their relationship. The problem with their marriage was that they were just fundamentally incompatible, something that was not Sarah Fricker’s fault—she was a product of her society and simply unprepared to be a wife to someone like Coleridge. Unfortunately, scholars have taken Coleridge’s letters as pure truth and seem to have forgotten that every marriage has two partners, both with their own perspectives. This reflects a deliberate ignorance of Coleridge’s tendency to see situations quite differently from how they actually were. Because of this tradition, Sarah Fricker Coleridge is often portrayed as difficult at best and a harridan at worst. It does not help that she attempted to help her husband’s reputation by the majority of their letters that she possessed—one cannot see her side as clearly. In this essay, I hope to prove that she was simply an unhappy wife, married to a poetic genius who had decided she was the impediment to his happiness while she only wanted to keep their family together and safe.
  • ABSTRACT Genius, Heredity, and Family Dynamics. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and His Children: a Literary Biography Yolanda J. Gonz

    ABSTRACT Genius, Heredity, and Family Dynamics. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and His Children: a Literary Biography Yolanda J. Gonz

    ABSTRACT Genius, Heredity, and Family Dynamics. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and his Children: A Literary Biography Yolanda J. Gonzalez, Ph.D. Chairperson: Stephen Prickett, Ph.D. The children of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Hartley, Derwent, and Sara, have received limited scholarly attention, though all were important nineteenth century figures. Lack of scholarly attention on them can be blamed on their father, who has so overshadowed his children that their value has been relegated to what they can reveal about him, the literary genius. Scholars who have studied the children for these purposes all assume familial ties justify their basic premise, that Coleridge can be understood by examining the children he raised. But in this case, the assumption is false; Coleridge had little interaction with his children overall, and the task of raising them was left to their mother, Sara, her sister Edith, and Edith’s husband, Robert Southey. While studies of S. T. C.’s children that seek to provide information about him are fruitless, more productive scholarly work can be done examining the lives and contributions of Hartley, Derwent, and Sara to their age. This dissertation is a starting point for reinvestigating Coleridge’s children and analyzes their life and work. Taken out from under the shadow of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, we find that Hartley was not doomed to be a “child of romanticism” as a result of his father’s experimental approach to his education; rather, he chose this persona for himself. Conversely, Derwent is the black sheep of the family and consciously chooses not to undertake the family profession, writing poetry.
  • Kubla Khan: S.T

    Kubla Khan: S.T

    Kubla Khan: S.T. Coleridge The Poet and His Poetry Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834) was not only a major Romantic poet, but he was also the foremost philosopher and literary critic of his age. His poetic output is erratic in comparison to Wordsworth‟s, but his contribution to English literary history also includes his literary criticism and his lively discussion of the ideas of the German Idealist philosophers, particularly Immanuel Kant. His theory regarding the cognitive and synthesising role of the imagination is one of the most important cornerstones of the Romantic Movement. John Stuart Mill summed up his influence on the age when he called Coleridge a “seminal mind”. Birth and the early years Comment [U1]: Uniformly bullet these sub-units Coleridge was born at Ottery St. Mary, Devonshire, on October 21, 1772, the youngest son of John Coleridge, vicar, and Ann Bowdon, his second wife. A precocious boy, dreamy and introspective, he finished the Bible and the Arabian Nights before he was five. At ten, following the death of his father, he was sent to Christ‟s Hospital, London, as a charity boy. Though poor and neglected, he became an accomplished Greek and Latin Scholar. Here he met Charles Lamb. It was the first of many significant literary friendships. He entered Jesus College, Cambridge on a scholarship in 1791; but in spite of a brilliant career in classics, he finally left the college in 1794, without taking a degree. At University, he was interested in the radical political and religious ideas of his day. He had already been attracted by the motto of the French Revolution and Jacobin politics, though later he dismissed it as a youthful folly.
  • Reminiscences of Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Robert Southey by Joseph Cottle

    Reminiscences of Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Robert Southey by Joseph Cottle

    Reminiscences of Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Robert Southey by Joseph Cottle Reminiscences of Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Robert Southey by Joseph Cottle Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Thomas Berger, Charles Franks and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team. [Illustration: Portrait.] * * * * * REMINISCENCES OF SAMUEL TAYLOR COLERIDGE AND ROBERT SOUTHEY by JOSEPH COTTLE * * * * * INTRODUCTION. It is with a solemnized feeling that I enter on these Reminiscences. page 1 / 646 Except one, I have survived all the associates of my earlier days. The young, with a long life in perspective, (if any life can be called long, in so brief an existence) are unable to realize the impressions of a man, nearer eighty than seventy, when the shadows of evening are gathering around, and, in a retrospective glance, the whole field of past vision appears, in all its complexities, like the indistinct tumults of a dream. The acute reasoner--the fiery politician--the eager polemic--the emulous aspirant after fame; and many such have I known, where are they? and how mournful, if any one of them should be found, at last, to have directed his solicitudes, alone, to material objects;--should have neglected to cultivate his own little plot of earth, more valuable than mines! and have sown no seeds for eternity. It is not a light motive which could have prompted me, when this world of "Eye and Ear" is fast receding, while grander scenes are opening, and so near! to call up almost long-forgotten associations, and to dwell on the stirring, by-gone occurrences that tend, in some measure, to interfere with that calm which is most desirable, and best accords with the feelings of one who holds life by such slender ties.
  • Select Who's Who

    Select Who's Who

    Select Who's Who These brief notes are intended to amplify references in the Chron­ ology, particularly to individuals not in the public domain. The well-known figures of Wordsworth, Lamb, Southey, Byron, De Quincey and Hazlitt are excluded, as are Mary Lamb and Dorothy Wordsworth, since information about them is readily available elsewhere. Adams, Dr Joseph (1756-1818), physician and editor of the Medical and Physical Journal, published a book on cancer in 1795. In 1805 he became physician to the Smallpox Hospital in London. He recom­ mended STC to the care of James Gillman in 1816. Aders, Mr and Mrs Charles Mr Aders was a wealthy German mer­ chant who lived in Euston Square and owned valuable paintings. STC met him during the Highgate years. Mrs Aders, nee Eliza Smith, was a daughter of John Raphael Smith, painter and engraver. STC addressed his poem The Two Founts' to her. The Aders' home housed a fine collection of Italian, early Flemish and German paint­ ings. Samuel Palmer visited in the 1820s, as did Charles Lamb, who wrote a poem describing it as a chapel. Allen Robert (1772-1805), known as 'Bob Allen', was an army sur­ geon and journalist. He was at Christ's Hospital with STC, and went on as a sizar to University College, Oxford, where STC visited him in 1794; Allen introduced him to Southey of Balliol. He became inter­ ested in Pantisocracy, but defected by the end of the year. STC wrote in his defence to Southey, 'He did never promise to form one of our party' (Letters, !.
  • The Language of the Southey-Coleridge Circle

    The Language of the Southey-Coleridge Circle

    Pratt, Lynda & David Denison. 2000. The language of the Southey-Coleridge circle. Language Sciences 22.3, 401-22. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/language-sciences/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000100000139 THE LANGUAGE OF THE SOUTHEY-COLERIDGE CIRCLE 1 LYNDA PRATT and DAVID DENISON In this joint paper the Southey-Coleridge circle is looked at from two points of view. The first part of the paper, written by Pratt, employs a literary-historical approach in order to establish the boundaries of the network and to explore its complex social and textual dynamics. Concentrating on both the public and private identities of the Southey-Coleridge circle, it reveals the complex nature of literary and political culture in the closing years of the eighteenth century. The second part, written by Denison, examines a linguistic innovation, the progressive passive, and relates it to usage by members of the circle acting as a social network. A brief conclusion draws both parts together. The Southey-Coleridge Circle in the 1790s In his 1802 appraisal of the Oriental romance Thalaba the Destroyer (1801), Francis Jeffrey, one of the leading lights of the recently founded Edinburgh Review , identified a ‘sect of poets’ who were all ‘dissenters from the established systems in poetry and criticism’ and whose writings were fuelled by a ‘splenetic and idle discontent with the existing institutions of society’ ( Edinburgh Review 1 (October 1802), quoted in Madden, 1972: 68, 76). This group included Robert Southey, the author of Thalaba , Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth. 2 It was a sect which early nineteenth-century contemporaries and critics were 1 We are grateful to Grevel Lindop for helpful encouragement, and to Sylvia Adamson for numerous cogent promptings towards clarity.

  • Pantisocracy and Pennsylvania: Plans of Coleridge and Southey and of Cooper and Priestley (1)

    70 Bull. Hist. Chem., VOLUME 30, Number 2 (2005) PANTISOCRACY AND PENNSYLVANIA: PLANS OF COLERIDGE AND SOUTHEY AND OF COOPER AND PRIESTLEY (1) J. Edmund White Introduction formation she retrieved about the sites of the proposed settlements and the lands involved; but she assumed a During the period 1793-95, two plans for settlements in participation by Dr. Priestley in the project not supported the central part of the State of Pennsylvania were pro- by the evidence, possibly because of some confusion posed and pursued, each associated with the immigra- between references to the father and the son. Thus it is tions to that region of Dr. and Mrs. Joseph Priestley and important to distinguish between the two Joseph their three sons. One of these plans—a refuge for En- Priestleys; Cooper sometimes referred to them as “old glish “friends of liberty”—involved a Priestley son and Priestley” and “young Priestley,” but, in this paper, the perhaps the father, whereas the other—a utopian father will be “Dr. Priestley” and the son “Joseph.” “Pantisocracy”—was conceived and developed by sev- Some questionable claims and some clearly incor- eral young poets, primarily Samuel Taylor Coleridge and rect statements have reappeared through the years. One Robert Southey. The two proposals are connected to illustration of such errors is found in a biography of some extent by the fact that the poets decided to estab- Coleridge published in 1996 (5). Several pages are lish their colony close to the Priestley settlement. A given to a description and good analysis of the concepts mutual friend had assured Coleridge that Dr.

  • Life of Samuel Taylor Coleridge

    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY FROM & Date Due I *.i>-4l|l -FO^ J9S1 -^ft— 1954 HS T^^^^J35£nj .j ^^^mrsrBzl '^iliw^i^lW^.' -m^^JLS. ^m. -TKir Cornell University Library PR4483.C13 Life of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, 3 1924 012 964 213 3 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31 92401 296421 f( (Breat Mntere.' EDITED BY ERIC S. ROBERTSON, M.A., PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH LITERATUftE AND PHILOSOPHY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE. ZJJ^E OF COLERIDGE. LIFE SAMUEL TAYLOR COLERIDGE BY HALL CAINE LONDON WALTER SCOTT 24 WARWICK LANE, PATERNOSTER ROW 1887 4 ±ii^2.ys" CORNELL ONiVERSITY VLiBRARV NOTE. THIS short biography has been compiled from many sources that cannot be mentioned here—table-talk, letters, diaries, memoirs, reminiscences, magazine articles, newspaper reports, and a few documents which have not hitherto been employed by any biographer of Coleridge. To two living Coleridgeans I must more particularly acknowledge my indebtedness—Mr. T. Ashe, and Mr. H. D. Traill. I have, however, been compelled to depart from these excellent authorities in my rendering of certain incidents of the first importance, and in my general reading of Coleridge's character as a man. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. PAGB Testimonies to Coleridge's greatness ; he is born October 21, 1772, at Ottery St. Mary, wliere his father is vicar and schoolmaster ; his mother's character ; leaves Ottery on his father's death, and is admitted to Christ's Hospital July, 1782 ; not happy at school ; has thoughts of becoming a shoemaker, and then of entering the medical profession ; is a solitary lad ; reads poetry and metaphysics ; is flogged for infidelity ;' greatly influenced by Bowles' poetry ; begins to write himself; leaves Christ's Hospital in the autumn of 1790; Charles Lamb, his schoolfellow, describes him as he then was .
  • Revolutions in Thought and Action

    Revolutions in Thought and Action

    ‗THE BALANCE OR RECONCILIATION OF OPPOSITE OR DISCORDANT QUALITIES‘: POLITICAL TENSIONS AND RELIGIOUS TRANSITIONS IN THE WORKS OF SAMUEL TAYLOR COLERIDGE KATHRYN ELIZABETH BEAVERS A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Greenwich for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2011 DECLARATION I certify that this work has not been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not concurrently being submitted for any degree other than that of PhD being studied at the University of Greenwich. I also declare that this work is the result of my own investigations except where otherwise identified by references and that I have not plagiarised another‘s work. Student: 31 May 2011 Supervisor: 31 May 2011 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who have supported me in various ways over the course of my PhD, whom I would like to take a moment to thank here. Particularly, I would like to thank my family for their continual support and encouragement: Jon, for enduring my thesis-related mood-swings and crises over the last seven years, whilst also simultaneously handling his own; Mum and Dad, for their sustained financial and emotional support; Granddad, for his enthusiastic support in the early stages of my PhD; Sarah and Adam, Mike and Chris, for their sustained interest and encouragement, especially valued at times when the going was rough; and Jan and Gordon, for their continued and sustained interest in many areas of my life, in addition to my thesis. I would particularly like to express my gratitude to Gordon for his sound advice, and constructive criticism and suggestions, as well as his willingness to transfer his interest and abilities from aeronautical engineering to Romantic poetry.
  • Poetic Associations: the Nineteenth-Century English Poetry Collection of Dr

    Poetic Associations: the Nineteenth-Century English Poetry Collection of Dr

    Poetic Associations: The Nineteenth-Century English Poetry Collection of Dr. Gerald N. Wachs Poetry, usually considered a solitary art, is often produced within social circles and communities, shaped by friendships, rivalries, and collaborations. The same can be said of book collecting, an activity at once completely individualistic and yet pursued within a network of other collectors, booksellers, librarians, scholarly and collecting organizations. Poets read and revise each other’s drafts, dedicate their works to each other, review them, and send each other copies of their publications, sometimes with personal inscriptions. Book collecting also creates deep friendships and stiff competition. The nineteenth-century English poetry collection of Dr. Gerald N. Wachs (1937-2013) was formed in close association with bookseller Stephen Weissman and within a circle of bibliophilic and scholarly associations as well as other collec- tors and dealers, many vying for the same material. The Wachs collection, which numbers nearly 900 titles, includes works published from the start of the age we now call Romantic to the beginning of the twentieth century. The collection was started in 1970 and grew over a period of 40 years. It was guided throughout by Volume 3, covering 1800-1900, of The New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (1969-77). Books selected for the Wachs collection are nearly all “special” copies: in splendid condition, often one of very few known copies, and many with extraordinary inscriptions that illustrate personal and poetic associations. It is difficult to single out representative examples from such a rich assemblage. Some are little- known works by famous authors, and often quite unimpressive in appearance.

  • BULLETIN for the HISTORY of CHEMISTRY Division of the History of Chemistry of the American Chemical Society

    BULLETIN FOR THE HISTORY OF CHEMISTRY Division of the History of Chemistry of the American Chemical Society VOLUME 30, Number 2 2005 BULLETIN FOR THE HISTORY OF CHEMISTRY VOLUME 30, CONTENTS NUMBER 1 THE DEEP HISTORY OF CHEMISTRY Joseph B. Lambert, Northwestern University 1 GRANVILLE PERKINS AND LEPROSY CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE PHILIPPINES Ian D. Rae, University of Melbourne 10 KARL ELBS, 1858-1933 E. J. Behrman, Department of Biochemistry, The Ohio State University 19 THE HEART OF STEEL: A METALLURGICAL INTERPRETATION OF IRON IN HOMER Ruth Russo, Whitman College 23 FRIEDLIEB RUNGE AND HIS CAPILLARY DESIGNS Ernst F. Schwenk, Wiesbaden, Germany 30 JOHN HUGHES DAVIES. THE EFFECT OF THE SILENT ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE ON THE AMMONIA SYSTEM John T. Stock, University of Connecticut 35 THE HISTORY OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION AT LAFAYETTE COLLEGE Roger A. Egolf, Pennsylvania State University 41 BOOK REVIEWS 51 NUMBER 2 JOSEPH PRIESTLEY, NATURAL PHILOSOPHER Robert E. Schofield 57 PHLOGISTON THEORY AND CHEMICAL REVOLUTIONS Leslie V. Woodcock, University of Manchester, UK 63 PANTISOCRACY AND PENNSYLVANIA: PLANS OF COLERIDGE AND SOUTHEY AND OF COOPER AND PRIESTLEY J. Edmund White 70 ESTEEM, REGARD, AND RESPECT FOR RATIONALITY: JOSEPH PRIESTLEY’S FEMALE CONNECTIONS Kathleen L. Neeley, University of Kansas and M. Andrea Bashore, Joseph Priestley House 77 PRIESTLEY, JEFFERSON, AND ADAMS: THE ÉMIGRE AND AMERICAN POLITICS Judah B. Ginsberg, American Chemical Society 91 BERNARD COURTOIS (1777-1838), FAMED FOR DISCOVERING IODINE (1811), AND HIS LIFE IN PARIS FROM 1798 Patricia A. Swain 103 THE DECOMPOSITION OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE BY BLOOD. GEORGE SENTER’S DISCOVERY OF THE ENZYME INVOLVED John T. Stock† and James D.