Wilkerson + Bryan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wilkerson + Bryan WILKERSON + BRYAN WILKERSON & BRYAN, P.C. ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS 405 SOUTH HULL STREET MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104 TEL. 334.265.1500 MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 830 36101-0830 FAX 331.265.0319 d,um crv ~kc?rsonbrsnn.con~ December 15,2009 VIA HAND DELIWRY Mr. Walter L. Thomas, Jr., Secretary Alabama Public Service Commission 100 N. Union Street RSA Building, Room 850 Montgomery, AL 361 04 Re: Notification of the Transfer of Control Dear Mr. Thomas: On behalf of Enbridge Midcoast Energy, LP ("Enbridge") and American Midstream, LLC ("American Midstream"), we hereby advise the Alabama Public Service Commission ("APSC" or the "Commission") of the transfer of control of Enbridge Pipelines (AlaTenn) L.T,.C., an interstate natural gas pipeline with facilities in Alabama and Tennessee, and various Alabama intrastate gathering or transmission pipeline conlpanies owned by Enbridge to American Midstream. The change of control occurred on November 4,2009, with an effective date of November 1,2009, as a result of American Midstream's acquisition of all of Enbridge's membership interest pursuant to an October 2, 2009 Membership Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement between Enbridge and American Midstream. Details of this transaction are set out below. Description of the Comeanies Enbridge Entities Enbridge is a privately held limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and is a wholly-owned affibte of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P., which is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: EEP). Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. is based in Houston, Texas, with regional offices in Texas, Alabama, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and is a leading provider of natural gas transportation, gathering, processing and marketing services, owning and operating over eighty (80) transmission, end-user and gathering pipeline systems. Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. acquired all the assets of Midcoast Energy Walter L. Thomas, Jr. Page 2 December 15.2009 Resources Inc. ("Midcoast"), formerly known as Enbridge Midcoast Encrgy, L.P., in October 2002 and is in turn owned by Enbridge Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The following subsidiaries of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. were transferred to Enbridge prior to the transaction and hold the stated operating authority from the Commission: Enbridge Pipelines (Bamagas Intrastate) Inc. was originally incorporated in the State of Delaware on June 16,2000 as Bamagas Company, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Midcoast, but changed its legal name to Enbridge Pipelines (Bamagas Intrastate) Inc. on October 15,2001. On November 27,2000, in Docket 27713, this Commission issued a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity ('"CPCN") to Bamagas Company as a transportation company to construct and operate a gas transmission pipeline and to transport and/or sell natural gas fi-om a proposed interconnection with the fhcilities of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, at or near Barton, Alabama, eastward to a proposed interconnection with the kcilities of Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc, for use at Calpine Corporation's facilities at or near Decatur, Alabama. By further Order of this Commission dated July 16,2002, the Cormnission approved the conversion of Bamagas' certificated name 6om Bamagas Company, Inc. to Enbridge Pipelines (Bamagas Intrastate) L.L.C. In Docket 19967, the Commission granted Enbridge Pipelines (Tennessee River) L.L.C. (formerly known as Tennessee River Intrastate Gas Company, Inc. or "Tri-Gas") a CPCN to construct and operate intrastate pipeline facilities located in Colbert County, Alabama. This CPCN was later amended by Order of the Commission dated June 6,1989, in Docket 21008, to permit the transportation and sale of natural gas and other services to, fiom and between Colbert and Lawrence counties, Alabama, and was further amended in Docket 21 930 on September 9,1991, to authorize the transportation and sale of natural gas to the City of Decatur, Alaband an extension of its existing facilities in Lawrence County, Alabama. Tri-Gas' CPCN was later amended in Docket 23621 on July 11,1994, to allow for the transportation and sale of natural gas in Morgan County7Alabama, and the construction and acquisition of facilities to transport natural gas to Monsanto Company, outside the city limits of Decatur, Alabama; and on August 5, 1998, in Docket U-3883, the Commission approved an amendment to Tri-Gas' CPCN to permit the transportation and sale of natural gas to Lagus Corporation and Bunge Corporation, at or near Decatur, Alabama. On July 16, 2002, in Docket 21930, the Commission approved TriGas' petition to convert from Enbridge Pipelines (Tennessee Intrastate) Inc. to Enbridge Pipelines (Tennessee River) L.L.C. Lastly, on February 9,2006, in Docket 19967, the Commission approved the partial abandonment of Tri-Gas' CPCN involving the interconnecting facilities between Enbridge Pipelines (AlaTenn), L.L.C. and Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. On January 8,1990, in Docket 21291, the Commission granted a CPCN to Magnolia Pipeline Corporation for the construction, operation and use of a natural gas pipeline in Bibb, Chilton, Hale and Tuscaloosa counties. This CPCN was amended by the Commission on November 26,2002, permitting Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Intrastate) Inc. to assume jurisdiction over Magnolia Pipeline Corporation and then transferring the CPCN iiom Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Intrastate) Inc. to Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Intrastate), L.L.C. Walter L. Thomas, Jr. Pa~e3 December 15,2009 On December 4, 2002, in Docket 28770, thc Commission granted Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Gathering) Inc. and Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Gathering), L.L.C. a CPCN to own and operate certain pipeline facilities in Lamar, Fayette and Tuscaloosa counties, previously known as Magnolia Gathering, Inc. and approved the conversion of Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Gathering) Inc. to Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Gathering) L.L.C. Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Gathering) L.L.C. is itself comprised of the following systems: 1. The Detroit System gathered and transported natural gas fiom a well in Lamar County, Alabama through a pipeline system that interconnected with the Northwest Alabama Gas District ('WWAGD"). On May 2,2006, the Commission issued an order in Docket 28770 approving the abandonment of the portion of Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Gathering), L.L.C's CPCN governing the Detroit System. 2. The Fayette System pipeline gathers and transports natural gas &om approximately twenty-two (22) wells in Fayette County, Alabama. The systcm was built in various stages between 1976 and 1986 and also interconnects with the NWAGD. 3. The Moores Bridge System was comprised of a transmission pipeline located in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, that interconnected with the facilities of NWAGD, Alagasco and Sonat, Inc. On February 9,2006, the Commission issued an order in Docket 28770 approving the abandonment of the portion of Enbridge Pipelines (Alabama Gathering), L.L.C.'s CPCN governing the Moores Bridge Pipeline. 4. The Happy Hills System is a gathering system located in Fayette County, Alabama, and is contiguous with the Fayette System. The system, built in 1986, was purchased by Midcoast in 1996 and interconnects with the NWAGD. American Midstream American Midstream, a privately-owned Delaware limited liability company, has as its sole member American Midstream Partners, LP, a limited Delaware partnership that operates midstream natural gas-gathering and transmission facilities and provides a comprehensive range of services that link energy suppliers to utility, industrial, commercial and residential consumers. American Midstream Partners, LP, is, in turn, managed through a general partnership that is majority owned by the American Infrastructure MLP Funds, a private investment h. American Midstream is headquartered with American Midstream Partners, LP in Denver, Colorado, which also has an office in Houston, Texas, and field operating offices in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Im~actof the Transaction on Alabama Customers The change of control will result in no change to the rates, terms or services provided by Enbridge to its Alabama customers. Walter L. Thomas, Jr. Yaee 4 December 15,2009 Manaeement and Contact Information A post-transaction corporate organizational chart is attached as Exhibit "A." The new address for Enbridge to be used for official notices is: American Midstream Partners, LP Attn: William B. Mathews, VP and General Counsel 1200 17th Street Suite 2100 Denver, Colorado 80202 Phone: (303) 95 1-4284 Fax: (303) 951-4276 with copies to (which shall not constitute notice): Wilkerson & Bryan, P.C. 405 South Hull Street Montgomery, AL 36104 Attn: Mark D. Wilkerson Fax: 334.265.03 19 Email: [email protected] The financial records of Enbridge will be transitioned to and then maintained at: American Midstream Partners, LP 1200 17th Street Suite 2100 Denver, Colorado 80202 Phone: (303) 951 -4284 Fax: (303) 95 1-4276 Information pertaining to American Midstream's management team is attached as Exhibit "B." Should you have any questions or comments regarding this transaction, do not hesitate to contact me. Respectllly submitted, WILmRSON & BRYAN, P.C. Attachments Walter L. Thomas, Jr. Yaee 5 December 15,2009 cc: Honarabk John Gamer Robert Reed Joe White Dennis Kelly Exhibit B American Midstream Partners, LP Management Team Brian Bierbach, President and CEO e 29 years of experience in the eilergy industry 0 Prcsident and CEO of Footl-rills Energy \'eiltures
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 175/Monday, September 12, 2005
    Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 175 / Monday, September 12, 2005 / Notices 53787 the Draft EIS: the Consolidated Company, Chandeuleur Pipe Line Company, protests must be filed on or before the Corridors Route, and the MEPCO South Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Eastern date as indicated below. Anyone filing Route. DOE also analyzed a rescission Shore Natural Gas Company, El Paso Natural an intervention or protest must serve a alternative under which the existing Gas Company, Enbridge Pipelines (AlaTenn) copy of that document on the Applicant. L.L.C., Enbridge Pipelines (KPC), Enbridge permit would be rescinded and no Pipelines (Midla) L.L.C., Garden Banks Gas Anyone filing an intervention or protest international transmission line could be Pipeline, L.L.C., Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C., on or before the intervention or protest constructed. As indicated in the Draft Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP, Kern date need not serve motions to intervene EIS, DOE has designated the Modified River Gas Transmission Company, Kinder or protests on persons other than the Consolidated Corridors Route as its Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC, KO Applicant. preferred alternative. Transmission Company, Midwestern Gas The Commission encourages Transmission Company, Mississippi Canyon electronic submission of protests and Availability of the Draft EIS Gas Pipeline, LLC, Mojave Pipeline interventions in lieu of paper using the Company, Nautilus Pipeline Company, DOE has distributed copies of the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. Draft EIS to appropriate
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Inc. First Quarter Interim Report to Shareholders for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
    Enbridge Inc. First Quarter Interim Report to Shareholders For the three months ended March 31, 2015 NEWS RELEASE Enbridge reports first quarter adjusted earnings of $468 million or $0.56 per common share HIGHLIGHTS (all financial figures are unaudited and in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted) First quarter loss was $383 million, including the impact of net unrealized non-cash mark-to-market losses First quarter adjusted earnings were $468 million or $0.56 per common share Expansion of the Canadian Mainline system between Edmonton and Hardisty placed into service in April Enbridge delivered a formal proposal to transfer the majority of its Canadian Liquids Pipelines business and certain renewable energy assets to Enbridge Income Fund Enbridge announced a plan to optimize previously announced expansions of its Regional Oil Sands System Enbridge announced it will build, own and operate the Stampede Oil Pipeline to the planned Stampede development in the Gulf of Mexico Effective March 1,2015, Enbridge quarterly common share dividend increased by 33% over the last year to an annual rate of $1.86 per share CALGARY, ALBERTA – May 6, 2015 – Enbridge Inc. (Enbridge or the Company) (TSX:ENB) (NYSE:ENB) – “Enbridge delivered a solid first quarter of 2015, reflecting a combination of strong asset performance and the ongoing successful execution of our growth capital program,” said Al Monaco, President and Chief Executive Officer. “Adjusted earnings for the first quarter of 2015 were $468 million or $0.56 per common share. “Our results were in line with our expectations, and we remain on track to deliver full year adjusted earnings per share within our guidance range of $2.05 to $2.35,” Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Line 3 Replacement Project Market Analysis
    Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Application Submitted to the NEB Line 3 Replacement Program Appendix 10-3 ENBRIDGE LINE 3 REPLACEMENT PROJECT MARKET ANALYSIS October 2014 15455 Dallas Parkway Level 58 Republic Plaza Tower 42 Suite 350 One City Centre 9 Raffles Place 25 Old Broad Street Addison, TX 75001-4690 1021 Main Street, Suite 1560 Singapore 048619 London EC2N 1HN Phone: 214-954-4455 Houston, TX 77002 Phone: 65-6832-1341 United Kingdom Phone: 713-890-1182 Fax: 214-954-1521 Fax: 65-6832-1491 Phone: 44-0-207-374-8994 Fax: 214-954-1521 Page 1 of 33 Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Application Submitted to the NEB Line 3 Replacement Program Appendix 10-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................... 5 CRUDE OIL MARKET OVERVIEW .................................................................... 8 UPPER MIDWEST ......................................................................................... 9 LOWER MIDWEST ....................................................................................... 10 ONTARIO / QUEBEC .................................................................................... 12 MID-CONTINENT .......................................................................................... 13 GULF COAST ............................................................................................... 14 DESCRIPTION OF ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _______________________________ FORM 10-K _______________________________ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-10934 _______________________________ ENBRIDGE INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) _______________________________ Canada None (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 425 - 1st Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3L8 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (403) 231-3900 _______________________________ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Shares New York Stock Exchange _______________________________ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
    [Show full text]
  • Transporting Natural Gas
    About U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines – Transporting Natural Gas The U.S. natural gas pipeline network is a highly U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Network integrated transmission and distribution grid that can transport natural gas to and from nearly any location in the lower 48 States. The natural gas pipeline grid comprises: • More than 210 natural gas pipeline systems. • 300,000 miles of interstate and intrastate transmission pipelines (see mileage table). • More than 1,400 compressor stations that maintain pressure on the natural gas pipeline network and assure continuous forward movement of supplies (see map). • More than 11,000 delivery points, 5,000 click to enlarge receipt points, and 1,400 interconnection See Appendix A: Combined ‘Natural Gas points that provide for the transfer of natural Transportation’ maps gas throughout the United States. • 29 hubs or market centers that provide See Appendix B: Tables additional interconnections (see map). • 394 underground natural gas storage facilities (see map). Geographic Coverage of Pipeline Companies • 55 locations where natural gas can be United States - links to companies listed A-Z with U.S. map imported/exported via pipelines (see map). showing regional breakout detail • 5 LNG (liquefied natural gas) import facilities and 100 LNG peaking facilities. Northeast - CT, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA, VT, WV Learn more about the natural gas Midwest - IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI Southeast - AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN pipeline network: Southwest - AR, LA, NM, OK, TX Central - CO, IA, KS,
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets
    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge(BR) Crude Oil Map.JAN19
    Enbridge NW Zama Rainbow Lake R a i n b Taylor o w Woodland Fort McMurray Norealis Woodland Ext Wood Bualo Prince George Norlite Cheecham Prince George Waupisoo Husky – 12 Athabasca Wood Bualo Ext Athabasca Twin Edmonton Trans Mountain Imperial Oil – 189 Suncor – 142 Edmonton Lloydminster Shell – 92 TMX North West Refining – 80 Lloydminster Vancouver TMX Kamloops Hardisty Husky – 82 Parkland Fuel Corp (Burnaby) – 55 Sundre Vancouver in ta Southern Moun Trans Kerrobert Lights Come By Chance Anacortes Come by Chance Regina NARL Refining LP – 136 Puget Sound CO-OP – 145 Express BP (Ferndale) – 238 Shell (Anacortes) – 142 Bow River Regina Marathon (Anacortes) – 119 CANADA Phillips 66 (Ferndale) – 105 TrailStone (Tacoma) – 40 Rangeland Cutbank Cenex Cromer Keystone XL Wascana Great Falls Gretna Calumet – 33 Great Falls Saint John Bridger Quebec City Irving – 300 Billings Clearbrook Montreal/Quebec City ExxonMobil – 60 Belle Sandpiper Valero (Quebec City) – 235 Halifax Fourche Superior Phillips 66 – 60 Tesoro Husky – 48 Suncor (Montreal) – 137 Saint John CHS (Laurel) – 58 Billings Minnesota Superior Montreal Mandan M W o W n Express e tr h eal PADD IV . c P C C r North Dakota ortla o u n o Marathon (Mandan)– 71 d r o r Sarnia Portland r r F Wyoming i i Marathon (Dickinson) – 19 d Imperial Oil – 119 e Sinclair Oil (Sinclair) – 86 o l o l rr K Suncor – 85 HollyFrontier (Cheyenne) – 49 e St Paul Dakota Access e B ButeButte Nova – 80 Sinclair Oil (Evansville) – 24 y San Francisco s Shell – 71 Wyoming Ref (Newcastle) – 18 Platte t St Paul Chevron
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 90/Thursday, May 9
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 90 / Thursday, May 9, 2002 / Notices 31287 the Board is empowered to conduct the Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY meeting in a fashion that will facilitate p.m., Monday through Friday, except the orderly conduct of business. Federal holidays. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Minutes: The minutes of the meeting Issued at Washington, DC, on May 6, 2002. will be available for public review and Rachel Samuel, [Docket No. RM96–1–019, copying within 30 days at the Freedom Deputy Committee Management Officer. of Information Public Reading Room, Standards For Business Practices of 1E–190, Forrestal Building, 1000 [FR Doc. 02–11611 Filed 5–8–02; 8:45 am] Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines; Independence Avenue, SW., BILLING CODE 6450–01–P Notice of Compliance Filing Docket No. Algonquin Gas Transmission Company .......................................................................................................................................... RP02–259–000 Algonquin LNG, Inc. ........................................................................................................................................................................ RP02–260–000 Alliance Pipeline L.P. ....................................................................................................................................................................... RP02–315–000 ANR Pipeline Company ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Over Troubled Water the Enbridge Gxl System’S Threat to the Great Lakes
    ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES WRITING TEAM: KENNY BRUNO, CATHY COLLENTINE, DOUG HAYES, JIM MURPHY, PAUL BLACKBURN, ANDY PEARSON, ANTHONY SWIFT, WINONA LADUKE, ELIZABETH WARD, CARL WHITING PHOTO CREDIT: SEAWIFS PROJECT, NASA/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, AND ORBIMAGE ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes A B ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE . 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 DOUBLE CROSS — ­ENBRIDGE’S SCHEME TO EXPAND TRANSBORDER TAR SANDS OIL FLOW WITHOUT PUBLIC OVERSIGHT . 6 CASE STUDY IN SEGMENTATION: FLANAGAN SOUTH . 8 THREAT TO THE HEARTLAND: WISCONSIN THE TAR SANDS ARTERY . 9 ENBRIDGE’S “KEYSTONE KOPS” FOUL THE KALAMAZOO . 11 TAR SANDS INVASION OF THE EAST . 1 3 “THE WORST POSSIBLE PLACE” — LINE 5 AND THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC . 1 4 OF WILD RICE AND FRACKED OIL — THE SANDPIPER PIPELINE . 18 ABANDONMENT: ENBRIDGE LINE 3 MACHINATIONS . 21 NORTHERN GATEWAY . 23 CONCLUSIONS . 24 TAR SANDS MINING IN ALBERTA CANADA. PHOTO CREDIT: NIKO TAVERNISE PREFACE If you drive a car in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois or Michigan, chances are there’s tar sands in your tank. That fuel probably comes to you courtesy of Canada’s largest pipeline company, Enbridge. This report tells the story of that company and its system of oil pipelines in the Great Lakes region. TAR SANDS OIL refers to a class of crude oils that Before there was Keystone, there was the Lakehead System.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquids Pipelines Customer Handbook
    Enbridge Pipelines Inc. 200, 425 – 1st Street S.W. 2020 Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3L8 Telephone: 403-231-3900 enbridge.com/customerhandbook Liquids Pipelines Customer Handbook Enbridge Liquids Pipelines Customer Handbook February 2020 How to reach us c How to reach us d Table of Contents 1 President’s Message 2 Meeting the Needs of Our Customers 4 North American Supply Projection 6 The Enbridge Mainline 6 Mainline System Capacity 7 Recent Expansions 10 System Optimization 11 Mainline Tolls 12 Oil Sands Infrastructure 12 Existing 13 Development 14 Market Access 14 Eastern Access 15 Southern Access Extension 16 Spearhead Pipeline 18 U.S. Gulf Coast Access 20 Express/Platte 21 Bakken Infrastructure 22 Non-Regulated Contract Terminals 25 Diluent Access 26 Pipeline System Configuration 27 Oil Sands Regional System Configuration 28 Maps • Commodity Movement Map • Athabasca Major Pipelines • Major Canadian and U.S. Forward-looking Information Crude Oil Pipelines and Refineries This booklet includes references to forward-looking information. Although Enbridge believes these forward-looking statements are reasonable, based on the information available on the date such statements are made, they are not guarantees of future performance or outcomes. Life Takes Energy The Energy You Count On, 1 the Reliability You Expect At Enbridge, we exist to help fuel the further mainline optimizations, and of course Vern Yu our largest project, the US portion of the Line quality of life for millions of people across President, 3 Replacement project. The expansion of the Liquids Pipelines, Dakota Access Pipeline and completion of the Gray Oak Pipeline will provide North America. We are North America’s Enbridge Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Management's Discussion and Analysis
    ENBRIDGE INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS December 31, 2014 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) dated February 19, 2015 should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Enbridge Inc. (Enbridge or the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2014, prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). All financial measures presented in this MD&A are expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated. Additional information related to the Company, including its Annual Information Form, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. OVERVIEW Enbridge, a Canadian Company, is a North American leader in delivering energy. As a transporter of energy, Enbridge operates, in Canada and the United States, the world's longest crude oil and liquids transportation system. The Company also has significant and growing involvement in natural gas gathering, transmission and midstream businesses and an increasing involvement in power transmission. As a distributor of energy, Enbridge owns and operates Canada's largest natural gas distribution company and provides distribution services in Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and New York State. As a generator of energy, Enbridge has interests in more than 2,200 megawatts (MW) (1,600 MW net) of renewable and alternative energy generating capacity and is expanding its interests in wind, solar and geothermal facilities. Enbridge employs more than 11,000 people, primarily in Canada and the United States. The Company’s activities are carried out through five business segments: Liquids Pipelines; Gas Distribution; Gas Pipelines, Processing and Energy Services; Sponsored Investments; and Corporate, as discussed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Levels — Enbridge Liquids Pipeline Mainline Network
    Service Levels — Enbridge Liquids Pipeline Mainline Network — Updated July 2020 Table of contents About the Service Levels .................................................... 1 Schedule ......................................................................... 6 Schedule change requests before injection ........................... 6 Safely getting your product to your customers ....................... 2 Line space queue or “standby-list” ....................................... 6 Pipeline transportation ................................................... 2 Transit estimates ............................................................ 6 Many locations served ................................................... 2 Batches de-assigned or cancelled ....................................... 6 Many grades of commodities ........................................... 2 Retention and working stock .............................................. 6 Pipeline service overview ................................................... 3 Inject and transport ........................................................... 7 Crude characteristics ..................................................... 3 Schedule, batch size, timing, and flow rate ............................. 7 Transportation service prices, rules, and tariffs ..................... 3 Receipt tank use ............................................................. 7 Receipt tickets ............................................................... 7 Get set up to ship ............................................................
    [Show full text]