DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ultimate Expression of a Nation's Wealth—Volume 8, Issue 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ultimate Expression of a Nation's Wealth—Volume 8, Issue 3 Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development Volume 8, Issue 3 Fall 2018 Published by the Thomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems with the support of: www.FoodSystemsJournal.org ISSN 2152-0801 (online only) and the members of the JAFSCD Shareholder Consortium Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development Published by the Thomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems, a project of the Center for Transformative Action, and with the support of our institutional sponsors: Lyson Center Leadership Team Cheryl Danley, Food Systems Consultant, Detroit, Michigan Ardyth Harris Gillespie, Nutritional Sciences (Retired), Cornell University (cochair) Gilbert W. Gillespie, Development Sociology, Cornell University (Retired)* Heidi Mouillesseaux-Kunzman, Development Sociology, Cornell University (cochair)* Scott Peters, Cornell University Ricardo Salvador, Union of Concerned Scientists JAFSCD Advisors Colin R. Anderson, Coventry University (UK) Richard Kiely, Cornell University (USA) Laura Brown, University of Connecticut Extension (USA)* Jane Kolodinsky, University of Vermont (USA)* Craig Chase, Iowa State University (USA) Larry Lev, Oregon State University (USA) Kate Clancy, Food Systems Consultant; Johns Hopkins Joseph McIntyre, Ag Innovations Network (USA)* University; Minnesota Institute for Sustainable Agriculture; and Shawn McKenzie, Johns Hopkins University (USA) Tufts University (USA)† Ken Meter, Crossroads Resource Center (USA)* Nevin Cohen, City University of New York (USA)* Michael Meth, Florida State University (USA) David Conner, University of Vermont (USA)* Heidi Mouillesseaux-Kunzman, Cornell University (USA) Cheryl Davida Danley, Food Systems Consultant (USA) Kent Mullinix, Kwantlen Polytechnic University (Canada) Mary Jo Dudley, Cornell University (USA) Scott J. Peters, Imagining America: Artists and Scholars in Public Cornelia Butler Flora, Iowa State University (USA) Life, and Cornell University (USA) Julia Freedgood, American Farmland Trust (USA)* Rich Pirog, Center Michigan State University (USA) Gilbert W. Gillespie, Jr., Harrisdale Homestead, Iowa (USA)* Ken Robinson, Clemson University (USA) Joanna Green, Groundswell Center for Local Food and Farming Ricardo Salvador, Union of Concerned Scientists (USA) (Retired) (USA) John Smithers, University of Guelph (Canada) R. Bruce Gregory, Farmer, Mitchell Bay Farm & Nursery (USA)* Dawn Thilmany, Colorado State University (USA) Shermain Hardesty, University of California–Davis (USA)* Jennifer Wilkins, Syracuse University (USA) Eric Holt-Giménez, Food First/Institute for Food and Larry Yee, Fairhaven Strategy Group (USA) Development Policy (USA) Rami Zurayk, American University of Beirut (Lebanon)* John Ikerd, University of Missouri, Columbia (Emeritus) (USA)† Anupama Joshi, National Farm to School Network/Occidental * Also serves on reviewer team College (USA)* † Also writes a regular column JAFSCD Staff Publisher and Editor in Chief: Duncan L. Hilchey / [email protected] / +1-607-342-0259 / Skype: duncan.hilchey Managing Editor: Amy S. Christian / [email protected] / +1-607-342-0258 / Skype: amy.christian295 The Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, ISSN 2152-0801 (online only), is published quarterly (Summer, Fall, Winter, Spring) by the Thomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems, a project of the Center for Transformative Action (an affiliate of Cornell University). Journal office: 295 Hook Place, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA. JAFSCD is open access through the support of our annual partners, our university and college program shareholders, library shareholders, and nonprofit and foundation shareholders. Our transition to open access was supported by a grant from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Learn more about how to support the broad distribution of JAFSCD research at www.LysonCenter.org. As an open access publication; article authors retain copyright. Contents are licensed using the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license. Learn more at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 The publisher assumes no responsibility for any statements of fact or opinion expressed in these published papers. JAFSCD Reviewers Paivi Abernethy, U of Waterloo (Canada) Neva Hassanein, U of Montana (USA) Kim L. Niewolny, Virginia Tech (USA) Shivaugn Ahern, Independent consultant (Costa Rica) Lena Hatchett, Loyola U Chicago (USA) Kimberly Norris, Encompass LLC (USA) Colin R. Anderson, Coventry U (UK) Mary Hendrickson, U of Missouri (USA) Josh O’Conner, Independent consultant (USA) Molly Anderson, Middlebury College (USA) Johanna Herron, State of Alaska, Division of Agriculture Lydia Oberholtzer, Penn State U (USA) Sandip Banerjee, Hawassa U (India) (USA) Fernando Ona, Tufts U (USA) James Barham, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USA) Elizabeth Higgins, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Maria Oria, National Academies of Sciences, Karen Bassarab, Johns Hopkins U (USA) Ulster County, New York (USA) Engineering, and Medicine (USA) Mark Bauermeister, Iowa State U (USA) Tia Ho, Portland State U (USA) Aleck Ostry, U of Victoria (Canada) Allison Bauman, Colorado State U (USA) Lesli Hoey, U of Michigan (USA) Anne Palmer, Johns Hopkins U (USA) Jody Beck, U of Colorado–Denver (USA) Brandon Hoover, Messiah College (USA) Laxmi Prasad Pant, U of Guelph (Canada) Florence A. Becot, U of Vermont (USA) Leslie Hossfeld, Mississippi State U (USA) François Pelatan, AMAP/CIVAM Regional Network for Rebecca Boehm, U of Connecticut (USA) Guiping Hu, Iowa State U (USA) Aquitaine (France) Ellie Bomstein, Independent advocate (USA) Sarah Huang, Purdue U (USA) Robert Perry, U of Kentucky (USA) Becky L. Bowen, North Carolina State Extension Sarah Hultine Massengale, U of Missouri Extension Ryan Pesch, U of Minnesota (USA) (USA) (USA) Greg Pillar, Queens U of Charlotte (USA) Ariadne Brancato, U of Washington (USA) Valerie Imbruce, Bimghamton U (USA) Emily Piltch, Tufts U (USA) Mladen Brnčić, U of Zagreb (Croatia) Becca Jablonski, Colorado State U (USA) Michael Pinto, Osborn Architects (USA) Laura Brown, U of Connecticut Extension (USA) Ann Myatt James, Pennsylvania State U (USA) Joanna Pollock, U of Arkansas (USA) Lynda Brushett Brandi Janssen, U of Iowa (USA) Christine Porter, U of Wyoming (USA) William Butler, Florida State U (USA) Chelsea Johnson, Ohio Ecological Food and Farm Matthew Potteiger, Syracuse U (USA) Larissa Calancie, U of North Carolina–Chapel Hill Association (OEFFA) (USA) Alicia Powers, Alabama Cooperative Extension System (USA) Love Jonson, City of Portland (Oregon) Bureau of (USA) Christopher Cane, FoodCorps service member (USA) Planning and Sustainability; Persephone Farm (USA) Madeleine Pullman, Portland State U (USA) Michelle Carnegie, U of New England (Australia) Anupama Joshi, Blue Sky Funders Forum (USA) Mallory Rahe, Oregon State U (USA) Megan Carney, U.C.–Santa Barbara (USA) Mariam Kadzamira, International Food Policy Research Md. Masud Parves Rana, Rajshahi U (Bangladesh) Kuo-Chiang (Matt) Chang, South Dakota State U (USA) Institute (USA) Anne Randle, U of Georgia (USA) Nevin Cohen, City U of New York (USA) David A. Knauft, U of Georgia (USA) Connie Ray, Hood College (USA) Sean Connelly, University of Otago/Te Whare Wananga Uma Koirala, Tribhuvan U (Nepal) Taylor Reid, Michigan State U (USA) o Otago (New Zealand?) Jane Kolodinsky, U of Vermont (USA) Henk Renting, International Network of Resource David Conner, U of Vermont (USA) Julia Laforge, Lakehead U (Canada) Centres on Urban Agriculture and Food Security Amy K. Coplen, Portland State U (USA) Laura Lavid, Sprout City Farms (USA) (RUAF Foundation) (The Netherlands) Christine Costello, U of Missouri–Columbia (USA) Megan Lehnerd, Tufts U (USA) Kristin A. Reynolds, The New School (USA) Amy Crone, Maryland Farmers Market Association Kristi Lekies, The Ohio State U (USA) Suzana Rimac Brnčić, U of Zagreb (Croatia) (USA) Dale Levering, Sterling College (USA) Marta G. Rivera-Ferre, U of Vic–Central U of Catalonia Tom Daniels, U of Pennsylvania (USA) Charles Z. Levkoe, Lakehead U (Canada) (Spain) Laura De Los Santos, St. Augustine College, Field Robin A Lewis, Hobart and William Smith Colleges Antonio Roman-Alcalá, International Institute of Social Museum (USA) (USA) Studies (USA) Bessie DiDomenica, Walden U (USA) Matt Lobley, U of Exeter (UK) Amy Rosenthal, Rutgers U (USA) Carolyn Dimitri, New York U (USA) Bohdan Lojka, Czech U of Life Sciences (Czech Natalie R. Sampson, U of Michigan–Dearborn (USA) Michael L. Dougherty, Illinois State U (USA) Republic) Raychel E. Santo, Johns Hopkins U (USA) Steven R. Dukeshire, Dalhousie U (Canada) Helena C. Lyson, U of California San Francisco Joshua Sbicca, Colorado State U (USA) Rebecca Dunning, North Carolina State U (USA) William Armand Mala, U of Yaounde I (Cameroon) Brian J. Schilling, Rutgers U (USA) Hamid El Bilali, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Christian Man, Penn State U (USA) Carrie Scrufari, Vermont Law School (USA) Bari (CIHEAM-MAIB) (Italy) Lisa Markowitz, U of Louisville (USA) David Shideler, Oklahoma State U (USA) Mark Estep, Montana Mobile Processing Co. (USA) Matthew Mars, U of Arizona (USA) Kelly Shreeve, CTCORE-Organize Now! (USA) Ayman Ekram Fahim, Suez Canal U (Egypt) Wende Marshall, Independent scholar (USA) Stacey Stearns, U of Connecticut (USA) James R. Farmer, Indiana U (USA) Sarah Martin, Memorial U of Newfoundland (Canada) Garry Stephenson, Oregon State U (USA) Cathy Farnworth, Independent consulant (USA) Derek Masselink, British Columbia Ministry of Bill Swanson, Valentine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Articles 1. the Case for Animal Protection Curricula in Schools In
    Volume 2 Issue 1 Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research Northumbria University – ISSN 2632-0452 – All content CC-BY 4.0 Articles 1. The Case For Animal Protection Curricula in Schools in Hong Kong, Claudia Man- yiu Tam, The University of Hong Kong 2. Identifying Genocide: The Yazidi Massacre in the Context of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide 1948, Jade Potot-Warren, Northumbria University Dissertations 1. Reasonable responses versus proportionality in employee dismissal cases: A comparison between the Employment Rights Act 1996, s 98(4) and the Equality Act 2010, s 13(2), s 15(1)(b), and s 19(2)(d). Susan B O’Brien, Northumbria University 2. Has the Supreme Court condemned the rule from Pinnel’s Case to irrelevancy? An Examination of Rock Advertising v MWB Business Exchange Centres and its effect on the Part Payment of Debt Rule, Promissory Estoppel, and No Oral Modification Clauses. Jaxson Hind, Northumbria University 3. Feminist Judicial Decision-Making as Judicial Decision-Making: A Legitimate and Valuable Approach? Felicity Adams Undergraduate Posters 1. Approaches to Law 19/20 – Poster Conference. Various Authors Oral Presentation 1. The Ghosts Around the Coasts: Anarchy and Equity in Transboundary River Basins, Mohsen Nagheeby, Northumbria University Volume 2 Issue 1 Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research Editorial My Call was Answered! Rachel Dunn, Northumbria University In my last editorial, I called on more students, from any university, to send their work to the journal. The response to this has been amazing and the journal is expanding to all corners of the globe! This issue shows some of those submissions, and there have been more submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Personhood for Animals and the Intersectionality of the Civil & Animal Rights Movements
    Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 5 2016 Free Tilly?: Legal Personhood for Animals and the Intersectionality of the Civil & Animal Rights Movements Becky Boyle Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse Part of the Law Commons Publication Citation Becky Boyle, Free Tilly?: Legal Personhood for Animals and the Intersectionality of the Civil & Animal Rights Movements, 4 Ind. J. L. & Soc. Equality 169 (2016). This Student Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 4, Issue 2 FREE TILLY?: LEGAL PERSONHOOD FOR ANIMALS AND THE INTERSECTIONALITY OF THE CIVIL & ANIMAL RIGHTS MOVEMENTS BECKY BOYLE INTRODUCTION In February 2012, the District Court for the Southern District of California heard Tilikum v. Sea World, a landmark case for animal legal defense.1 The organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) filed a suit as next friends2 of five orca whales demanding their freedom from the marine wildlife entertainment park known as SeaWorld.3 The plaintiffs—Tilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka, and Ulises—were wild born and captured to perform at SeaWorld’s Shamu Stadium.4 They sought declaratory and injunctive relief for being held by SeaWorld in violation of slavery and involuntary servitude provisions of the Thirteenth Amendment.5 It was the first court in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Peaceful Activism | Vegfund Blog
    4/19/13 The Power of Peaceful Activism | VegFund Blog The Power of Peaceful Activism Posted on March 14, 2013 Corey Lee Wrenn, VegFund’s Spring 2013 intern, discusses the history of peaceful activism and why it’s effective. Nonviolence in social movement activism has a long and successful history and works for one very important reason: it attracts people. The more people who are attracted to the movement, the more resources a HOM E movement can gather, and the more successful that movement will be. ABOUT US Nonviolent activism has been central to most social movements. In a survey of over three hundred social movements in the 20th century, Chenoweth and Stephan (2011) found that nonviolent movements were likely to succeed because they increased participation and movement resources. They also tend to lead to PROGRAM S lasting success when a movement accomplishes its goals. VOLUNTEER & INTERN Nonviolent means were hugely popular with most anti-slavery advocates and were important for laying the groundwork for emancipation. Advocates swamped the U.S. mail with abolitionist literature, flooded CONTACT US Congress with petitions, assisted runaways, even boycotted slave-made products such as cotton and sugar. These tactics were low-risk and made participation easy and inviting for all. Without these methods, utilized WHY VEG? for decades before the Civil War, the abolition of slavery would not have even registered in public sentiment, much less the Union agenda. BLOG The Civil Rights movement of the twentieth century also successfully utilized nonviolent protest to raise – 2013 awareness and elicit public sympathy. Marches, sit-ins, and Freedom Riders who rode buses into + March (5) segregated states all utilized peaceful means to convey moral issues in a non-threatening way.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Sociology
    240 Reviews A Rational Approach to Animal Rights: Extensions spirituality, beliefs, and experiences rather in Abolitionist Theory,byCorey Lee Wrenn. than being grounded in rational thought New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 239 consisting of ‘‘reason, critical thinking, pp. $100.00 cloth. ISBN: 9781137434647. reflexivity, and skepticism’’ (p. 16). She is also critical of how both animal welfare JESSICA GREENEBAUM organizations and animal abolitionist groups Central Connecticut State University promote post-feminist and post-racial activ- [email protected] ism. Thus, Wrenn calls for a new abolitionist approach that uses a rigorous scientific Leaders in the various nonhuman animal approach based in social science methodolo- rights movements argue over whether it is gy and theory that promotes social justice more efficient and productive to advance an over individual action. animal welfare or animal rights/liberation Wrenn uses Weber’s analysis of bureaucra- agenda. Members of these same movements cies and George Ritzer’s concept of McDo- debate whether they should endorse vegan- naldization to explain how nonhuman ani- ism or vegetarianism or just encourage peo- mal protection agencies have become less ple to reduce their consumption of meat effective since adopting a more professional- and dairy products. They also disagree over ized and bureaucratic stance. Non-profit whether veganism should be promoted for organizations, like the Humane Society of animal rights, diet and health, or environ- the United States (HSUS) or People for the
    [Show full text]
  • Wrenn Colostate 0053A 13455.Pdf
    DISSERTATION PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION Submitted by Corey Lee Wrenn Department of Sociology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Michael Carolan Lynn Hempel Michael Lacy Marcela Velasco Copyright by Corey Lee Wrenn 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION This project explores the intra-movement interactions between professionalized and radical factions in the social movement arena using a content analysis of movement literature produced by the Nonhuman Animal rights movement between 1980 and 2013. Professionalized factions with greater symbolic capital are positioned to monopolize claimsmaking, disempower competing factions, and replicate their privilege and legitimacy. Radical factions, argued to be important variables in a movement’s health, are thus marginalized, potentially to the detriment of movement success and the constituency for whom they advocate. Specifically, this study explores the role of professionalization in manipulating the tactics and goals of social movement organizations and how the impacts of professionalization may be aggravating factional boundaries. Boundary maintenance may prevent critical discourse within the movement, and it may also provoke the “mining” of radical claimsmaking for symbols that have begun to resonate within the movement and the public. Analysis demonstrates a number of important consequences to professionalization that appear to influence the direction of factional disputes, and ultimately, the shape of the movement. Results indicate some degree of factional fluidity, but professionalization does appear to be a dominant force on movement trajectories by concentrating power in the social change space.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals & Society
    Animals & Society Section of the American Sociological Association Spring 2020 Newsletter Letter from the Chair What’s Inside: Dear colleagues, Letter from the Chair 1 I write my second and final letter as the Our Mission 4 2019/2020 Chair from isolation in city center Canterbury, England. It is late COVID-19 Update 4 April, and the human death toll in the US, UK, and too many other parts of the Annual Meeting Update 5 world continues to rise. The toll on other animals—who have been buried alive Membership Survey in agricultural facilities, “euthanized” in Results 7 laboratories, fed to one another in zoos, starved for want of food on city streets, Features: purchased in droves for backyard egg production, and abandoned at shelters Fighting for by panicked owners—remains too unimaginable to quantify. the Antioch Lambs 9 As someone who has dedicated my life and career to the study of animals and society, my academic mind can understand why this disaster Book Release Q&A 11 has occurred, but my heart breaks at the tragic absurdity of it all. Humanity’s Announcements: relationship with the natural world and nonhuman animals (both free-living Publications & News 16 and domesticated) is not instinctual or inevitable, it’s cultural. And culture doesn’t always get it right. COVID-19 has demonstrated so very painfully Call for Papers & that culture can be toxic, but any card-carrying sociologist can tell you that Grant Opportunity 17 culture is something that can be changed. Just how we would go about doing so is the question.
    [Show full text]
  • Atheism in the American Animal Rights Movement: an Invisible Majority
    Atheism in the American Animal Rights Movement: An Invisible Majority COREY LEE WRENN School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research Cornwallis North East University of Kent Canterbury, Kent Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Previous research has alluded to the predominance of atheism in participant pools of the Nonhuman Animal rights movement (Galvin and Herzog 1992; Guither 1998), as well as the correlation between atheism and support for anti-speciesism (Gabriel et al. 2012; The Humane League 2014), but no study to date has independently examined this demographic. This article presents a profile of 210 atheists and agnostics, derived from a larger survey of 287 American vegans conducted in early 2017. Results demonstrate that atheists constitute one of the movement’s largest demographics, and that atheist and agnostic vegans are more likely to adopt veganism out of concern for other animals. While these vegans did not register a higher level of social movement participation than religious vegans, they were more intersectionally oriented and more likely to politically identify with the far left. Given the Nonhuman Animal rights movement’s overall failure to target atheists, these findings suggest a strategic oversight in overlooking the movement’s potentially most receptive demographic. KEYWORDS Animal rights; atheism; secularism; social movements; veganism 1. INTRODUCTION The relationship between atheism and anti-speciesism has shown promise in previous research, but it has only been mentioned parenthetically in studies that otherwise prioritise race, class, gender, social values, political attitudes Environmental Values © 2019 The White Horse Press. doi: Submitted 9 January 2018; accepted 31 January 2019 2 COREY LEE WRENN and other demographic profiles of Nonhuman Animal rights activists, vegans and vegetarians.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Championship Year August Early Start League Ratings - Men & Women
    2016 Championship Year August Early Start League Ratings - Men & Women Last First Middle Gender City Rating Abbott Angela F Suwanee 3.5 Abbott Betty F Atlanta 3.5 ABE NAOKO F Duluth 4.0 Abel Ann F Johns Creek 3.0 Abel Katie F Avondale Estates 3.5 Abels Deborah C. F Atlanta 3.0 Abiassaf Nila F Milton 3.5 Abner Sheila Rae F Decatur 3.5 Abney Wendy Moss F Acworth 2.5 Abney Samantha Kate F Acworth 3.0 Abramowitz Sherri L. F Marietta 3.5 Ackaway Paige F Dunwoody 4.0 Ackerman Cindy Sukloff F Marietta 3.0 Acree Catherine F Powder Springs 3.0 Adair Shirley F Atlanta 3.5 Adair Kim S. F Norcross 3.5 Adair Jody F Marietta 3.0 Adam Leah Anne F Acworth 3.5 Adamec Carol F Buford 4.0 Adams Deedra F Alpharetta 3.5 Adams Wendy C. F Grayson 3.5 Adams Annette Talarico F Johns Creek 3.5 Adams Lynn F Decatur 3.5 Adams Jacalynn F Acworth 4.0 Adams Ritsuko F Alpharetta 3.0 Adams Tracie Renee F Atlanta 3.0 Adams Emily F Roswell 3.5 Adams Andrea F Stone Mountain 3.0 Adams C Ann F Snellville 2.5 Adams-Joyce Kathleen F Cumming 4.0 Adamson Debbie F Dawsonville 3.5 Adderly Jill F Norcross 3.0 Adkins Sarah R. F Roswell 3.5 Adkins Denise F Smyrna 4.0 Adler Lisa F Atlanta 3.5 Adzema Allison Rosen F Atlanta 3.5 Aertker Cindy N. F Marietta 3.5 Ager Nancy F Marietta 4.5 Ages Tricinda F Douglasville 4.0 Aguirre Belsaid Norhe F Duluth 4.5 Ahlfinger Jody S.
    [Show full text]
  • Corey Lee Wrenn, Ph.D
    Corey Lee Wrenn, Ph.D. Department of School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent Cornwallis North East, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF [email protected] Education 2016 Ph.D., Colorado State University, Sociology 2008 M.S., Virginia Tech, Sociology 2005 B.A., Virginia Tech, Political Science; Minors: Sociology, Asian Area Studies Areas of Specialization Animal rights mobilization Animals and society Ecofeminism Social movements Vegan Studies Current Academic Positions 2020-Present Editorial Board, The Sociological Quarterly 2019-Present Co-Director, International Association of Vegan Sociologists 2019-Present Co-Director, Centre for the Study of Social and Political Movements, University of Kent 2019-Present Director of Studies, Environmental Social Science (PhD) 2019-Present Member, Research Advisory Committee, The Vegan Society 2018-Present Lecturer, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent 2018-Present Chair, Animals & Society Section, American Sociological Association 2017-Present Book Review Editor, Society & Animals Past Academic Positions 2016-2018 Adviser, Gender Studies Club, Monmouth University 2015-2018 Member, Gender Studies Executive Team, Monmouth University 2015-2018 Lecturer, Department of Political Science and Sociology, Monmouth University 2016-2018 Director, Gender Studies Program, Monmouth University 2012-2016 Instructor, Department of Sociology, Colorado State University 2006-2008 Research Coordinator, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute Research Books Wrenn, C. L. 2021. Animals in Irish Society. New York: SUNY Press. Wrenn, C. L. 2019. Piecemeal Protest: Animal Rights in the Age of Nonprofits. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.11301441. 2 Corey Lee Wrenn, Phd Wrenn, C. L. 2016. A Rational Approach to Animal Rights: Extensions in Abolitionist Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • SUNDAY Sunday, 7:00 Am Sunday, 8:30 Am
    This workshop is designed to help department and program leaders SUNDAY develop strategies that will help sociology students prepare to enter the labor force successfully. Specific objectives include developing strategies to: ● Sunday, 7:00 am Support faculty who would like to develop new courses ● Support faculty who are looking to integrate activities into existing courses ● Win over 2007. Meeting. Section on Medical Sociology Council skeptical faculty Our orientation is to suggest that faculty can make these Meeting modifications in courses and curricula without reducing the rigor and analytical focus of the undergraduate major and without committing to Pennsylvania Convention Center, 103B, Street Level, 7:00- revisions that are highly taxing in terms of faculty time or the mastery of new 8:15am material. The workshop draws on research that focuses on skills that employers want (e.g., Hart Research Associates 2015, National Association of 2017. Affiliated Group. Society and Mental Health Editorial Colleges and Employers 2015), students’ goals and objectives (e.g., Eagan et Board Meeting al. 2017) and sociology graduates’ first labor market experiences (e.g., Senter Pennsylvania Convention Center, 110AB, Street Level, 7:00- et al. 2015). This workshop builds on the material published in The Sociology Major in the Changing Landscape of Higher Education (Pike et al. 2017) and 8:15am much of it draws from an article forthcoming in Teaching Sociology , “Sociology Majors and Labor Market Success” (Ciabattari et al. under review). 2037. Meeting. 2019 Cox-Johnson-Frazier Award Selection Committee 2110. Section on Consumers and Consumption. New Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, 302, Level 3, 7:00-8:15am Approaches to Inequality and Consumption Pennsylvania Convention Center, 104B, Street Level, 8:30- 2038.
    [Show full text]
  • Am2021-Program.Pdf
    ASA is pleased to acknowledge the supporting partners of the 116th Virtual Annual Meeting 116th Virtual Annual Meeting Emancipatory Sociology: Rising to the Du Boisian Challenge 2021 Program Committee Aldon D. Morris, President, Northwestern University Rhacel Salazar Parreñas, Vice President, University of Southern California Nancy López, Secretary-Treasurer, University of New Mexico Joyce M. Bell, University of Chicago Hae Yeon Choo, University of Toronto Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve, Brown University Jeff Goodwin, New York University Tod G. Hamilton, Princeton University Mignon R. Moore, Barnard College Pamela E. Oliver, University of Wisconsin-Madison Brittany C. Slatton, Texas Southern University Earl Wright, Rhodes College Land Acknowledgement and Recognition Before we can talk about sociology, power, inequality, we, the American Sociological Association (ASA), acknowledge that academic institutions, indeed the nation-state itself, was founded upon and continues to enact exclusions and erasures of Indigenous Peoples. This acknowledgement demonstrates a commitment to beginning the process of working to dismantle ongoing legacies of settler colonialism, and to recognize the hundreds of Indigenous Nations who continue to resist, live, and uphold their sacred relations across their lands. We also pay our respect to Indigenous elders past, present, and future and to those who have stewarded this land throughout the generations TABLE OF CONTENTS d Welcome from the ASA President..............................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Medicalization of Nonhuman Animal Rights: Frame Contestation and the Exploitation of Disability
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2015 The Medicalization of Nonhuman Animal Rights: Frame Contestation and the Exploitation of Disability Corey Lee Wrenn Colorado State University, [email protected] Joanne Clark Independent Coder Maddie Judge University of Melbourne Katherine A. Gilchrist Independent Coder Delanie Woodlock Independent Coder See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/anirmov Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Civic and Community Engagement Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Wrenn, C. L., Clark, J., Judge, M., Gilchrist, K. A., Woodlock, D., Dotson, K., ... & Wrenn, J. (2015). The medicalization of Nonhuman Animal rights: frame contestation and the exploitation of disability. Disability & Society, 30(9), 1307-1327. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Corey Lee Wrenn, Joanne Clark, Maddie Judge, Katherine A. Gilchrist, Delanie Woodlock, Katherine Dotson, Riva Spanos, and Jonothan Wrenn This article is available at WBI Studies Repository: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/anirmov/5 The Medicalization of Nonhuman Animal Rights: Frame Contestation and the Exploitation of Disability Corey Lee Wrenna, Joanne Clarkb, Maddie Judgec, Katharine A. Gilchristd, Delanie Woodlocke,
    [Show full text]