2016 Championship Year August Early Start League Ratings - Men & Women

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2016 Championship Year August Early Start League Ratings - Men & Women 2016 Championship Year August Early Start League Ratings - Men & Women Last First Middle Gender City Rating Abbott Angela F Suwanee 3.5 Abbott Betty F Atlanta 3.5 ABE NAOKO F Duluth 4.0 Abel Ann F Johns Creek 3.0 Abel Katie F Avondale Estates 3.5 Abels Deborah C. F Atlanta 3.0 Abiassaf Nila F Milton 3.5 Abner Sheila Rae F Decatur 3.5 Abney Wendy Moss F Acworth 2.5 Abney Samantha Kate F Acworth 3.0 Abramowitz Sherri L. F Marietta 3.5 Ackaway Paige F Dunwoody 4.0 Ackerman Cindy Sukloff F Marietta 3.0 Acree Catherine F Powder Springs 3.0 Adair Shirley F Atlanta 3.5 Adair Kim S. F Norcross 3.5 Adair Jody F Marietta 3.0 Adam Leah Anne F Acworth 3.5 Adamec Carol F Buford 4.0 Adams Deedra F Alpharetta 3.5 Adams Wendy C. F Grayson 3.5 Adams Annette Talarico F Johns Creek 3.5 Adams Lynn F Decatur 3.5 Adams Jacalynn F Acworth 4.0 Adams Ritsuko F Alpharetta 3.0 Adams Tracie Renee F Atlanta 3.0 Adams Emily F Roswell 3.5 Adams Andrea F Stone Mountain 3.0 Adams C Ann F Snellville 2.5 Adams-Joyce Kathleen F Cumming 4.0 Adamson Debbie F Dawsonville 3.5 Adderly Jill F Norcross 3.0 Adkins Sarah R. F Roswell 3.5 Adkins Denise F Smyrna 4.0 Adler Lisa F Atlanta 3.5 Adzema Allison Rosen F Atlanta 3.5 Aertker Cindy N. F Marietta 3.5 Ager Nancy F Marietta 4.5 Ages Tricinda F Douglasville 4.0 Aguirre Belsaid Norhe F Duluth 4.5 Ahlfinger Jody S. F Suwanee 3.0 Ahmed Marielba F Duluth 4.5 Ahn Sung Ar F Buford 4.5 Ahrenkiel Wendy F Atlanta 3.5 Aiken Jody F Alpharetta 3.5 Ainsley Alacia G. F Buford 3.5 Ajluni Sherry A. F Cumming 3.5 Akers Caroline F Roswell 4.0 Albert Keri E. F Atlanta 3.5 Albisu Susana F Roswell 3.5 Albrecht Valerie F Atlanta 3.5 Albrecht Jennifer L F Cumming 3.5 Albright Rhona F Snellville 4.0 Albritton Judy F Marietta 3.5 Albritton Heather F Winder 4.0 Alden Elisha F Atlanta 4.0 Alderman Tammy F Marietta 4.0 Aldredge Constance F Flowery Branch 3.5 Aldrete Aguirre Monica F Marietta 3.0 Aldridge Adria F Smyrna 4.0 Aldworth Lynette F Roswell 4.0 Alexander Rosemary F Atlanta 4.0 Alexander Taylor F Sandy Springs 4.0 Alexander Pamela T F Atlanta 3.5 Alexander Lisa F Atlanta 3.5 Alexander Julie F F Duluth 3.0 Alexander Lora F Aurora 3.0 Alexander Jennifer F Alpharetta 3.0 Alexander Jessie Beth F Decatur 3.0 Alexander Che F Atlanta 3.0 Alf Jackie Lenore F Norcross 3.0 Alford Patricia A. F Marietta 3.0 Alford Elizabeth S F Marietta 3.0 Alibaksh Sophie F Atlanta 3.0 Allen Courtney A. F Duluth 5.5 Allen Tracey F Atlanta 4.0 Allen Susan M F Suwanee 3.5 Allen Sandra M. F Acworth 4.5 Allen Julie A. F Atlanta 4.0 Allen Janet H. F Kennesaw 4.0 Allen Lane F Decatur 3.0 Allen Tara F Atlanta 3.5 Allen Chequetta F Atlanta 3.0 Allen Margaret S. F Suwanee 3.0 Allen Bernadette F Atlanta 3.0 Allen Karen Mutchler F Forsyth 4.0 Allen Lisa F Roswell 3.0 Allen Belinda F Atlanta 3.0 Allen Sonya F Conyers 3.0 Allen Marnie F Roswell 3.0 Allen Karen F Cumming 3.0 Allen Leigh Ann F Atlanta 3.0 Alley Suzanne F Marietta 3.0 Allison Kim F Atlanta 4.0 Allman Virginia L. F Atlanta 3.5 Allred Jennifer L F Atlanta 4.5 Allred deborah Ann F Suwanee 3.0 Allred Susan F Cumming 3.5 Alms Jennifer F Atlanta 3.5 Alspaugh Victoria R. F Alpharetta 4.0 Alsup Sarah E. F Alpharetta 3.5 Alterman Amy F Marietta 4.0 Alvarez Beverly F Atlanta 4.5 Alvarez-Kiely Gloria F Milton 3.0 Alves Laura J. F Kennesaw 4.5 Alzola Lauren F Marietta 3.0 Amacher Kelli F Cumming 3.5 Amaral Kayla F Atlanta 4.0 Amason Beth F Roswell 3.5 Ambat Rorita F Loganville 3.0 Amin Nita F Conyers 4.0 Amoni Ginger F Atlanta 4.0 Amsberry Victoria F Loganville 4.0 Anand Sangeeta S F Duluth 3.5 Ancona Diane L. F Marietta 3.0 Anderson Stacey S. F Roswell 3.5 Anderson Lee F Atlanta 4.0 Anderson Terry J. F Atlanta 3.5 Anderson Lynn E. F Acworth 4.0 Anderson Lindsey F Cataula 4.0 Anderson Pamela F Alpharetta 4.0 Anderson Melissa M. F Lawrenceville 3.5 Anderson Catherine F Decatur 3.5 Anderson Shirley F Stone Mountain 3.5 Anderson Leslie G. F Roswell 4.0 Anderson Sylvia V. F Cumming 3.5 Anderson Linda Wishon F Roswell 3.0 Anderson Joy F Duluth 4.0 Anderson Tammy F Duluth 3.0 Anderson Blandine F Lawrenceville 3.0 Anderson Stephanie R. F Atlanta 3.5 Anderson Sara Christine F Alpharetta 3.5 Anderson Dawn F Atlanta 3.5 Anderson Jane F Greenville 3.5 Anderson Dana L F Clarkesville 3.0 Anderson Maureen M F Alpharetta 3.5 Anderson Laura N F Marietta 3.5 Anderson Karen F Marietta 3.0 Anderson Cari F Suwanee 3.5 Anderson Carrie F Kennesaw 3.0 Anderson Claire F Alpharetta 3.0 Anderson Kelly F Dunwoody 3.0 Anderson Allie F Cumming 2.5 Anderson Susan F Kennesaw 3.0 Anderson Katrina T F Atlanta 3.0 Anderson Carey F Atlanta 3.0 Andersson Susan F Duluth 3.5 andre catherine F Atlanta 3.5 Andreaus Vickie B. F Suwanee 4.0 Andres Maria Luz F Alpharetta 3.5 Andrew Carolann F Atlanta 3.0 Andrews Beth O. F Murrells Inlet 3.0 Andrews Laura F Alpharetta 3.0 Andrist Sara F Atlanta 3.5 Andry Jennifer F Cumming 4.0 Anglin Kathy Elaine F Flowery Branch 3.5 Anglin Jackie F Kennesaw 2.5 Anglyn Nancy S. F Roswell 4.0 Angove Jill F Duluth 3.5 Angstadt Cheryl G. F Roswell 3.5 Annala Eva F Dacula 4.0 Anthony Beth R. F Atlanta 3.5 Antoci Mary Louise F Roswell 4.0 Anton Tami Shealy F Dacula 3.5 Antonio Monique M. F Cumming 4.0 Anueyiagu Hadiza F Alpharetta 3.0 Anugerah Rubina P F Alpharetta 3.5 Anyona Nelly W F Atlanta 4.5 Appelbaum Joan F Alpharetta 4.0 Appleby Lagaylia F ATLANTA 4.0 Applegate Wendy R. F Senoia 4.0 Aranda Bobbie L. F Rome 4.5 Archer Jill F Duluth 4.0 Archer Clair F Sandy Springs 3.5 Ardle Allison F Johns Creek 3.5 Ardrey Genia F Conyers 3.0 Arena Megan Sheehan F Atlanta 3.5 Aring Marguerite F Acworth 3.0 Aristeguieta Graciela C F Buford 3.5 Arkin Marilyn C. F Atlanta 4.0 Arkush Claudia F Roswell 3.0 Armentrout Betsy F Atlanta 3.0 Armfield Shannon F Roswell 4.5 Armistead Dianne H. F Marietta 3.0 Armour Judy F Alpharetta 4.5 Armour Nancy F Cumming 3.5 Armstrong Jennifer P. F Lithonia 4.0 Armstrong Wendy F Duluth 3.5 Armstrong Polly F Duluth 3.5 Armstrong Kari M F Dacula 3.0 Arnett Erin F Atlanta 4.0 ARNOLD CHRISTY F Grayson 4.0 Arnold Lane F Alpharetta 3.5 Arnold Kali Danielle F Atlanta 3.0 Arnold Chevenry F Cumming 3.5 Arnold Jackie F Marietta 4.0 Arnold Shannon F Cumming 3.5 Arntzen Tracy F Acworth 4.0 Arogeti Beth F Atlanta 4.0 Arogeti Amy F Atlanta 3.0 Aronson Marla Diane F Atlanta 3.5 Arora Cathi B. F Atlanta 4.0 Arrington Doni F Fayetteville 4.0 Arsenault Angie F Marietta 4.0 Arter Andrea F Atlanta 2.5 Artigue Tracey F Atlanta 4.5 Artzi Lea F Atlanta 3.5 Arunachalam Aarti F Smyrna 3.0 Arvesen Heather A. F Acworth 3.5 Aschenbach Amy F Marietta 3.5 Aschenbrenner Ann D. F Woodstock 3.5 Ash Kathy F Atlanta 4.0 Ash Latasha F Loganville 3.0 Ashburn Mindi F Smyrna 3.0 Ashendorf Deborah F Alpharetta 3.0 Asher Kathy Louise F Roswell 3.0 Ashley Micala C. F Social Circle 3.0 Ashman Kelly M. F Alpharetta 4.0 Ashraph Liz F Conyers 2.5 Ashton Suzanne F Roswell 3.5 Ashton Sarah Fielding F Atlanta 4.0 Ashwood Michelle F Dacula 3.0 Ashworth Edithe S. F Cumming 4.5 Askins Veronica T. F Snellville 4.0 Aslaksen Hilary Ann F Dunwoody 3.0 Atencio Jeanne F Marietta 3.0 Atha Tracy F Kennesaw 3.5 Athanassiades Beth F Decatur 3.0 Atkins Connie F Acworth 3.5 Atkins Kayla F Atlanta 3.0 Atkins Libby F Fayetteville 3.0 Atkinson Edie B. F Dacula 3.0 Attridge Leslie Penn F Cumming 3.5 Atwell Piper Lindsay F Lawrenceville 3.5 Atwood Kyle Ann F Acworth 3.5 Atwood Katherine F Suwanee 3.5 Aubry Andrea M F Roswell 3.0 Auger Julie F Woodstock 4.0 Augustin Roudline F Chamblee 2.5 Augustine Melissa F MARIETTA 3.0 Aurand Nancy L F Cumming 3.0 Ausenbaugh Sharon F Marietta 3.5 Austin Connie F Roswell 3.5 Austin Phyllis F Marietta 4.0 Austin Jana LeighLockett F Acworth 3.5 Austin Stephanie F Cumming 4.0 Austin Lynn F Duluth 3.0 Austin Jennie F Atlanta 3.0 Avery Kim F Powder Springs 4.0 Avery Kathy F Alpharetta 4.5 Avil Donna S.
Recommended publications
  • Articles 1. the Case for Animal Protection Curricula in Schools In
    Volume 2 Issue 1 Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research Northumbria University – ISSN 2632-0452 – All content CC-BY 4.0 Articles 1. The Case For Animal Protection Curricula in Schools in Hong Kong, Claudia Man- yiu Tam, The University of Hong Kong 2. Identifying Genocide: The Yazidi Massacre in the Context of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide 1948, Jade Potot-Warren, Northumbria University Dissertations 1. Reasonable responses versus proportionality in employee dismissal cases: A comparison between the Employment Rights Act 1996, s 98(4) and the Equality Act 2010, s 13(2), s 15(1)(b), and s 19(2)(d). Susan B O’Brien, Northumbria University 2. Has the Supreme Court condemned the rule from Pinnel’s Case to irrelevancy? An Examination of Rock Advertising v MWB Business Exchange Centres and its effect on the Part Payment of Debt Rule, Promissory Estoppel, and No Oral Modification Clauses. Jaxson Hind, Northumbria University 3. Feminist Judicial Decision-Making as Judicial Decision-Making: A Legitimate and Valuable Approach? Felicity Adams Undergraduate Posters 1. Approaches to Law 19/20 – Poster Conference. Various Authors Oral Presentation 1. The Ghosts Around the Coasts: Anarchy and Equity in Transboundary River Basins, Mohsen Nagheeby, Northumbria University Volume 2 Issue 1 Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research Editorial My Call was Answered! Rachel Dunn, Northumbria University In my last editorial, I called on more students, from any university, to send their work to the journal. The response to this has been amazing and the journal is expanding to all corners of the globe! This issue shows some of those submissions, and there have been more submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregating the Scare from the Greens
    DISAGGREGATING THE SCARE FROM THE GREENS Lee Hall*† INTRODUCTION When the Vermont Law Review graciously asked me to contribute to this Symposium focusing on the tension between national security and fundamental values, specifically for a segment on ecological and animal- related activism as “the threat of unpopular ideas,” it seemed apt to ask a basic question about the title: Why should we come to think of reverence for life or serious concern for the Earth that sustains us as “unpopular ideas”? What we really appear to be saying is that the methods used, condoned, or promoted by certain people are unpopular. So before we proceed further, intimidation should be disaggregated from respect for the environment and its living inhabitants. Two recent and high-profile law-enforcement initiatives have viewed environmental and animal-advocacy groups as threats in the United States. These initiatives are the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) prosecution and Operation Backfire. The former prosecution targeted SHAC—a campaign to close one animal-testing firm—and referred also to the underground Animal Liberation Front (ALF).1 The latter prosecution *. Legal director of Friends of Animals, an international animal-rights organization founded in 1957. †. Lee Hall, who can be reached at [email protected], thanks Lydia Fiedler, the Vermont Law School, and Friends of Animals for making it possible to participate in the 2008 Symposium and prepare this Article for publication. 1. See Indictment at 14–16, United States v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc., No. 3:04-cr-00373-AET-2 (D.N.J. May 27, 2004), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/files/ pdffiles/shacind.pdf (last visited Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Personhood for Animals and the Intersectionality of the Civil & Animal Rights Movements
    Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 5 2016 Free Tilly?: Legal Personhood for Animals and the Intersectionality of the Civil & Animal Rights Movements Becky Boyle Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse Part of the Law Commons Publication Citation Becky Boyle, Free Tilly?: Legal Personhood for Animals and the Intersectionality of the Civil & Animal Rights Movements, 4 Ind. J. L. & Soc. Equality 169 (2016). This Student Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 4, Issue 2 FREE TILLY?: LEGAL PERSONHOOD FOR ANIMALS AND THE INTERSECTIONALITY OF THE CIVIL & ANIMAL RIGHTS MOVEMENTS BECKY BOYLE INTRODUCTION In February 2012, the District Court for the Southern District of California heard Tilikum v. Sea World, a landmark case for animal legal defense.1 The organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) filed a suit as next friends2 of five orca whales demanding their freedom from the marine wildlife entertainment park known as SeaWorld.3 The plaintiffs—Tilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka, and Ulises—were wild born and captured to perform at SeaWorld’s Shamu Stadium.4 They sought declaratory and injunctive relief for being held by SeaWorld in violation of slavery and involuntary servitude provisions of the Thirteenth Amendment.5 It was the first court in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ANIMAL LIBERATION FRONT SUPPORTERS GROUP August 2009
    ANIMAL LIBERATION FRONT SUPPORTERS GROUP August 2009 This lamb was destined to end up on somebody’s plate, but no longer. Intead she and others will live a life of freedom ! Inside this issue Prisoner Features - News - Letters from Prisoners - Liberation Pictures - How to help the prisoners and more... For up to date prisoner listings and prisoner news, go to our website at: www.alfsg.org.uk Jonny Ablewhite Dan Amos Tre Arrow Gregg Avery Natasha Avery Nathan Block Mel Broughton Jake Conroy Lauren Gazzola Alex Hall Sean Kirtley Kevin Kjonaas Marie Mason Eric McDavid Daniel McGowan Gavin Med-Hall Heather Nicholas Kevin Olliff Johnathan Paul William James Viehl Nicole Vosper Dan Wadham Briana Waters Kerry Whitburn Sarah Whitehead 2 ALF SG BM Box 1160 London WC1N 3XX Editorial Welcome to another edition of the SG Newsletter. Because the main role of the SG is supporting the prisoners, the newsletter can often come over a little negative, dealing as it does with issues like arrests, court cases, prison conditions etc. But we should bear in mind that prison support is not just important for those particular prisoners, it is vital to the success of the whole animal liberation movement. To paraphrase several earlier writers involved in social struggles, any movement that does not support its political internees is a movement destined to fail. At the recent AR2009 International Animal Rights Gathering in Oslo, one of the three days was devoted to the theme of repression of the movement, and how to overcome it. We heard about how repression, which used to be mostly restricted to the UK and USA, was now spreading to other countries, such as Holland and Austria, and we heard of disturbing links between our government and theirs on the subject of how to tackle animal rights “extremists”.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Contentious Traditions, Eco-Political Discourse and Identity
    GENTLE GIANTS, BARBARIC BEASTS AND WHALE WARRIORS: Contentious Traditions, Eco-Political Discourse and Identity Politics Rob van Ginkel Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Amsterdam [email protected] Abstract Traditions are usually enmeshed in cultural politics, especially if they are highly controversial and heavily contested. In this article, I will firstly go into the tradition of the Faroe Islands’ grindadráp, a bloody pilot whale drive, which in Faroese eyes constitutes an inalienable part of their culture. It is strongly opposed by environmentalists and a wider audience. Secondly, I will examine the attempts of Makah Indians to revitalize their tradition of whale hunting in an effort to reinforce their identity. In this case, too, there was massive opposition, but the tribe nonetheless obtained permission to go whaling again. The eco-political discourse on Faroese and Makah whale hunting harbors a strong component of evaluating the merits and demerits of Faroese and Makah culture and the genuineness and legitimateness of the whaling traditions. The present article describes and analyses the debate, in particular as it relates to the issues of heritage and its contested authenticity. It argues that authenticity is not an ontological category but can only be produced in practice. Introduction In the commonsensical perception, ‘tradition’ often rings a bell of repetitive continuity. The term derives from the Latin traditio: to hand over. It is commonly thought of as an inherited pattern of thought or action, a specific practice of long standing, that which is transmitted from generation to generation. Departing from a similar conception, the pioneers of folklore and anthropology often conflated tradition and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Modello Shac the Militant Forces Against
    Il “modello SHAC” è applicabile anche ad altre lotte e a contesti diversi da quello della liberazione animale? In quali condizioni? Quali sono i suoi THE MILITANT FORCES vantaggi e difetti? Oggi che una delle campagne di pressione più importanti, a livello glo- AGAINST HLS (MFAH) bale, del movimento di liberazione animale si è conclusa (è dell’estate 2014 il comunicato uffi ciale che pone fi ne alla campagna), è tempo di rifl ettere sugli aspetti negativi e positivi di questo modello di attivismo e militanza, che è quasi riuscito a mettere in ginocchio una multinazionale della vivisezione, ma infi ne ha subìto i colpi di una durissima repressione, che lo stesso movimento non era preparato per aff rontare. Un modello ba- sato sulla diversità di tattiche mirate a uno stesso obiettivo, la chiusura di una multinazionale o di un luogo di tortura, attraverso l’attacco ai suoi clienti, fornitori, azionisti e a tutte le altre aziende che ne rendono pos- sibile il business. Quel che è fuori da ogni dubbio è che questa campagna non avrebbe potuto ottenere le vittorie che ha ottenuto se non fosse stata supportata dalle centinaia di azioni dirette (sabotaggi, liberazioni, in- cendi, minacce e imbrattamenti) realizzate nel corso degli ultimi 10 anni dall’ALF, dalle Militant Forces Against HLS e da altri gruppi o individui determinati a passare all’azione. IL MODELLO SHAC UNA RACCOLTA DI COMUNICATI DELLE AZIONI FIRMATE ‘MILITANT FORCES AGAINST HLS’ TRA IL 2009 E IL 2012 A SEGUIRE UN’ANALISI DELLA STRATEGIA DI SHAC E LA SUA POSSIBILE 56 1 APPLICABILITÀ AD ALTRE LOTTE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Peaceful Activism | Vegfund Blog
    4/19/13 The Power of Peaceful Activism | VegFund Blog The Power of Peaceful Activism Posted on March 14, 2013 Corey Lee Wrenn, VegFund’s Spring 2013 intern, discusses the history of peaceful activism and why it’s effective. Nonviolence in social movement activism has a long and successful history and works for one very important reason: it attracts people. The more people who are attracted to the movement, the more resources a HOM E movement can gather, and the more successful that movement will be. ABOUT US Nonviolent activism has been central to most social movements. In a survey of over three hundred social movements in the 20th century, Chenoweth and Stephan (2011) found that nonviolent movements were likely to succeed because they increased participation and movement resources. They also tend to lead to PROGRAM S lasting success when a movement accomplishes its goals. VOLUNTEER & INTERN Nonviolent means were hugely popular with most anti-slavery advocates and were important for laying the groundwork for emancipation. Advocates swamped the U.S. mail with abolitionist literature, flooded CONTACT US Congress with petitions, assisted runaways, even boycotted slave-made products such as cotton and sugar. These tactics were low-risk and made participation easy and inviting for all. Without these methods, utilized WHY VEG? for decades before the Civil War, the abolition of slavery would not have even registered in public sentiment, much less the Union agenda. BLOG The Civil Rights movement of the twentieth century also successfully utilized nonviolent protest to raise – 2013 awareness and elicit public sympathy. Marches, sit-ins, and Freedom Riders who rode buses into + March (5) segregated states all utilized peaceful means to convey moral issues in a non-threatening way.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Sociology
    240 Reviews A Rational Approach to Animal Rights: Extensions spirituality, beliefs, and experiences rather in Abolitionist Theory,byCorey Lee Wrenn. than being grounded in rational thought New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 239 consisting of ‘‘reason, critical thinking, pp. $100.00 cloth. ISBN: 9781137434647. reflexivity, and skepticism’’ (p. 16). She is also critical of how both animal welfare JESSICA GREENEBAUM organizations and animal abolitionist groups Central Connecticut State University promote post-feminist and post-racial activ- [email protected] ism. Thus, Wrenn calls for a new abolitionist approach that uses a rigorous scientific Leaders in the various nonhuman animal approach based in social science methodolo- rights movements argue over whether it is gy and theory that promotes social justice more efficient and productive to advance an over individual action. animal welfare or animal rights/liberation Wrenn uses Weber’s analysis of bureaucra- agenda. Members of these same movements cies and George Ritzer’s concept of McDo- debate whether they should endorse vegan- naldization to explain how nonhuman ani- ism or vegetarianism or just encourage peo- mal protection agencies have become less ple to reduce their consumption of meat effective since adopting a more professional- and dairy products. They also disagree over ized and bureaucratic stance. Non-profit whether veganism should be promoted for organizations, like the Humane Society of animal rights, diet and health, or environ- the United States (HSUS) or People for the
    [Show full text]
  • Wrenn Colostate 0053A 13455.Pdf
    DISSERTATION PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION Submitted by Corey Lee Wrenn Department of Sociology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Michael Carolan Lynn Hempel Michael Lacy Marcela Velasco Copyright by Corey Lee Wrenn 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION This project explores the intra-movement interactions between professionalized and radical factions in the social movement arena using a content analysis of movement literature produced by the Nonhuman Animal rights movement between 1980 and 2013. Professionalized factions with greater symbolic capital are positioned to monopolize claimsmaking, disempower competing factions, and replicate their privilege and legitimacy. Radical factions, argued to be important variables in a movement’s health, are thus marginalized, potentially to the detriment of movement success and the constituency for whom they advocate. Specifically, this study explores the role of professionalization in manipulating the tactics and goals of social movement organizations and how the impacts of professionalization may be aggravating factional boundaries. Boundary maintenance may prevent critical discourse within the movement, and it may also provoke the “mining” of radical claimsmaking for symbols that have begun to resonate within the movement and the public. Analysis demonstrates a number of important consequences to professionalization that appear to influence the direction of factional disputes, and ultimately, the shape of the movement. Results indicate some degree of factional fluidity, but professionalization does appear to be a dominant force on movement trajectories by concentrating power in the social change space.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegan Outreach: Fight Climate Change with Diet Change
    FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE WITH DIET CHANGE CLIMATE CHANGE & YOU What’s Really Worth Our Time? Can One Person Even Make a Difference? As the clock keeps ticking on climate change, with no action from the federal government in sight, these questions are more important than ever. Luckily, there is one area where our individual choices make a concrete difference— food. Keep reading to see why making a small change in our diet is one of the most powerful ways we can help everything from climate change, to species extinction, to air and water pollution. There’s one sector of the food system that has an outsized environmental impact— animal agriculture. Most of the problem stems from the sheer number of animals we raise and kill for meat, eggs, and milk every year in the United States. Do you know how many that is? Brace yourself. 9 BILLION There are over 9 billion land animals bred and slaughtered in the U.S. annually for food. That means there are more farmed animals raised every year in the U.S. than there are people on the entire PLANET. Raising all these animals produces over 200 pounds of meat per person in the U.S. every year, but it also causes a lot of problems. Most of the problems come from the fact that all of those animals eat, drink, burp, and poop. Growing Food For Animals, Not People When we think of farmers growing crops, we imagine food for people. But 75% of all agricultural land around the world is used for livestock production.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals & Society
    Animals & Society Section of the American Sociological Association Spring 2020 Newsletter Letter from the Chair What’s Inside: Dear colleagues, Letter from the Chair 1 I write my second and final letter as the Our Mission 4 2019/2020 Chair from isolation in city center Canterbury, England. It is late COVID-19 Update 4 April, and the human death toll in the US, UK, and too many other parts of the Annual Meeting Update 5 world continues to rise. The toll on other animals—who have been buried alive Membership Survey in agricultural facilities, “euthanized” in Results 7 laboratories, fed to one another in zoos, starved for want of food on city streets, Features: purchased in droves for backyard egg production, and abandoned at shelters Fighting for by panicked owners—remains too unimaginable to quantify. the Antioch Lambs 9 As someone who has dedicated my life and career to the study of animals and society, my academic mind can understand why this disaster Book Release Q&A 11 has occurred, but my heart breaks at the tragic absurdity of it all. Humanity’s Announcements: relationship with the natural world and nonhuman animals (both free-living Publications & News 16 and domesticated) is not instinctual or inevitable, it’s cultural. And culture doesn’t always get it right. COVID-19 has demonstrated so very painfully Call for Papers & that culture can be toxic, but any card-carrying sociologist can tell you that Grant Opportunity 17 culture is something that can be changed. Just how we would go about doing so is the question.
    [Show full text]
  • Atheism in the American Animal Rights Movement: an Invisible Majority
    Atheism in the American Animal Rights Movement: An Invisible Majority COREY LEE WRENN School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research Cornwallis North East University of Kent Canterbury, Kent Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Previous research has alluded to the predominance of atheism in participant pools of the Nonhuman Animal rights movement (Galvin and Herzog 1992; Guither 1998), as well as the correlation between atheism and support for anti-speciesism (Gabriel et al. 2012; The Humane League 2014), but no study to date has independently examined this demographic. This article presents a profile of 210 atheists and agnostics, derived from a larger survey of 287 American vegans conducted in early 2017. Results demonstrate that atheists constitute one of the movement’s largest demographics, and that atheist and agnostic vegans are more likely to adopt veganism out of concern for other animals. While these vegans did not register a higher level of social movement participation than religious vegans, they were more intersectionally oriented and more likely to politically identify with the far left. Given the Nonhuman Animal rights movement’s overall failure to target atheists, these findings suggest a strategic oversight in overlooking the movement’s potentially most receptive demographic. KEYWORDS Animal rights; atheism; secularism; social movements; veganism 1. INTRODUCTION The relationship between atheism and anti-speciesism has shown promise in previous research, but it has only been mentioned parenthetically in studies that otherwise prioritise race, class, gender, social values, political attitudes Environmental Values © 2019 The White Horse Press. doi: Submitted 9 January 2018; accepted 31 January 2019 2 COREY LEE WRENN and other demographic profiles of Nonhuman Animal rights activists, vegans and vegetarians.
    [Show full text]