DOCSLIB.ORG

ITA1 No.3096/Ahd/2010 (AY- 2006-07) General Motors India Pvt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ITA1 No.3096/Ahd/2010 (AY- 2006-07) General Motors India Pvt www.taxguru.in ITA1 No.3096/Ahd/2010 (AY- 2006-07) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, Panchmahal Circle, Godhra ITA No.3308/Ahd/2011 (AY- 2007-08) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, Pandhmahal Circle, Godhra IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH – AHMEDABAD (BEFORE SHRI G. C. GUPTA, VP AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM) I.T.A. Nos. 3096/Ahd/2010 and 3308/Ahd/2011 A.Ys. 2006-07 and 2007-08 General Motors India Pvt. Ltd., The D. C. I. T. / Chandrapura Industrial Estate, A. C. I. T., Dist. Panchmahal, vs Panchmahal Circle, Halol 389 350 Godhara P. A. No. AAACG 8371 P Appellant Respondent Appellant by Shri S. N. Soparkar, AR Respondent by Shri S. C. Tiwari, TPO and Shri D. P. Gupta, CIT - DR Date of hearing: 27-06-2013 Date of pronouncement: 02-08-2013 O R D E R PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY: 1. These two appeals of the assessee company are directed against the orders of the AOs u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Act dated 20.9.2010 and 28.10.2011 for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08 respectively. The above orders of the AOs were based on the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel [DRP] dated 27.8.2010 and 27.9.2011 for the AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08 respectively. I. ITA NO.3096/A/10 – AY 2006-07: 2. For this assessment year, the assessee company [‘the assessee’ in short] had, in fact, raised six grounds in an elaborate and illustrative manner. However, the assessee has, subsequently, come up 1 www.taxguru.in ITA2 No.3096/Ahd/2010 (AY- 2006-07) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, Panchmahal Circle, Godhra ITA No.3308/Ahd/2011 (AY- 2007-08) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, Pandhmahal Circle, Godhra with its concise grounds along with an additional ground vide its letter dated 5.9.2012, according to which, ground No.1 being general in nature; it does not survive for adjudication. The remaining grounds are reformulated as under: “That the AO/TPO erred: (2) in disallowing Rs.3,14,830/- being proportionate lease charges in respect of lease- hold land; (3) in disallowing Rs.4,16,978/- being expenditure incurred on gifts; (4) in disallowing Rs.2,50,68,560/- on account of provision for slow moving and obsolete inventory made by the assessee in respect of some items in accordance with the method of accounting consistently followed by it; (5) without prejudice, the AO/DRP erred in not allowing a deduction of Rs.3,67,03,644/- being provision for slow moving and obsolete inventory reversed during the year and credited to P & L account; (6) in making an ad-hoc disallowance of Rs.10,60,000/- out of account of workmen and staff welfare expenses; (7, 8, 9 & 11) in making a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.152,44,00,000/- [Rs.140.26 crores + Rs.12.18 crores]; - by reducing an expenditure of Rs.140,26,00,000/- on purchase of CKD Kits; - by making an addition of Rs.12,18,00,000/- in respect of its Tech. Centre operations; Additional ground: - by making the transfer pricing addition to the entire value of transactions entered Into by the assessee and had not made adjustments only to the value of International transactions entered into by the assessee (i.e., proportionate adjustments) and ignoring established jurisprudence in this regard; & (10) by not providing the benefit of 5 per cent range as provided by the proviso to s. 92C (2) of the Act. 2 www.taxguru.in ITA3 No.3096/Ahd/2010 (AY- 2006-07) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, Panchmahal Circle, Godhra ITA No.3308/Ahd/2011 (AY- 2007-08) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, Pandhmahal Circle, Godhra II. ITA NO.3308/A/10 – AY 2007-08: 2.1. Likewise, for the AY 2007-08 also, the assessee has raised fifteen grounds in an exhaustive manner and, subsequently, vide its letter dated 12.9.2012 substituted the same with thirteen concise grounds. 2.2. Ground Nos.1 & 6 being general and no specific issues are involved; they do not survive for adjudication. The remaining concise grounds are reformulated as under: “That the AO/TPO erred: (2) in disallowing Rs.2,91,258/- being proportionate lease charges in respect of lease hold-land; (3) in disallowing Rs.5,15,876/- being expenditure incurred on gifts; (4 & 5) in disallowing Rs.2,44,28,818/- on account of provision for slow moving and obsolete inventory made by the assessee in respect of some items in accordance with the method of accounting consistently followed by it; - in disallowing the said amount which was the cost of inventory for which provision had been made; (7, 8, 9 & 10) In making a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.227,21,60,504/- [Rs.206 crores + 16.32 crores]; - by reducing the expenditure of Rs.206 crores on purchase of CKD Kits by the assessee from its AEs; - by making an addition of Rs.16,32,00,000/- with respect to its Tech. Centre operations; (11) by making an addition of Rs.4,89,60,504/- to the taxable income with respect to royalty transaction; (12) by not providing relief on account of working capital adjustment to reflect the differing levels of trade receivables, trade payables and inventories (working capital adjustments) between the assessee and the potential comparables; & (13) by not providing the assessee the benefit of 5 per cent range as provided by the proviso to s. 92 C(2) of the Act. 3 www.taxguru.in ITA4 No.3096/Ahd/2010 (AY- 2006-07) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, Panchmahal Circle, Godhra ITA No.3308/Ahd/2011 (AY- 2007-08) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, Pandhmahal Circle, Godhra 3. As the facts of the issues involved in these appeals being almost similar and identical, for the sake of convenience and clarity, they were heard, considered together and disposed of in this consolidated order. 4. For record, we would like to point out that the final arguments of the cases were concluded by the rival parties on 15.3.2013. Subsequently, on 15.5.2013, the Revenue came up with the copies of findings of the Hon’ble Mumbai Benches in the cases of (i) M/s. Onward Technologies Limited in ITA NO.7985/Mum/2010 and (ii) M/s. Aurionpro Solutions Limited in ITA NO.7872/Mum/2001 with a plea that since the issue of determining of the ‘tested party’ under dispute is covered by the above findings and in favour of the Revenue, the same requires to be considered while deciding the present appeals. In order to facilitate the assessee to have its comments, if any, on the case laws on which the Revenue has placed its reliance (supra), the cases were scheduled for final hearing on 7.6.2013 and finally the case was re-heard on 27.06.2013. 5. Reverting back to the main issue, during the course of hearing, the assessee vide its application dated 2.11.2012 sought the permission of this Bench to produce additional evidence on the premise that during the hearings before the TPO & DRP, un-audited analysis of the product line profitability schedules prepared by the assessee including the figures of yearly sales and operating profit were submitted. One of the objections recorded by the TPO and the DRP were that the said accounts were un- audited. In view of the above, the assessee places the following additional evidence on record: 4 www.taxguru.in ITA5 No.3096/Ahd/2010 (AY- 2006-07) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, Panchmahal Circle, Godhra ITA No.3308/Ahd/2011 (AY- 2007-08) General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, Pandhmahal Circle, Godhra “Audited analysis of PLP by General Motors India (GMI) with the transfer pricing calculation of General Motor Daewoo Auto & Technology [GMDAT] for the period from 1.4.2006 to 31.3.2007.” 5.1. After hearing the rival parties and also having considered the reasoning of the assessee in non-furnishing of the audited accounts before the authorities below earlier, the additional evidence now sought to be furnished was directed to be placed on record. 6. We shall now proceed to adjudicate the issues chronologically as under: Briefly stated, the issues involved are that – A.Y. 2006-07: 7. The assessee is engaged in manufacture and trading of automobiles and its parts. The assessee had, for the assessment year 2006-07 furnished its return of income admitting ‘Nil’ income. The AO had made a reference u/s 92CA (1) of the Act to the TPO for computation of ALP in relation to the international transaction as detailed in the audit report in Form No.3CEB. The TPO had passed an order u/s 92CA (3) of the Act, proposing an adjustment of Rs.152.44 crores thereby enhancing the income of the assessee by the said sum. In the TP proceedings, the assessee had made various submissions with regard to reduction in the expenditure on purchase of CKD Kits and services, change of tested party, partial/total disallowance of extraordinary expenses on account of adjustments made to compensate for lower capacity utilization, reduction of cost on account of lower level of indigenization, reduction in the quantum of additional marketing, advertisement, selection of companies which 5 www.taxguru.in ITA6 No.3096/Ahd/2010 (AY- 2006-07) General Motors India Pvt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Essays on Business Groups and the Judiciary in South Korea
    ESSAYS ON BUSINESS GROUPS AND THE JUDICIARY IN SOUTH KOREA by Hansoo Choi B.A. in Economics, Seoul National University, 1996 M.A. in Economics, University of Pittsburgh, 2011 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Hansoo Choi It was defended on May 6, 2014 and approved by Thomas Rawski, PhD, Professor of Economics Luca Rigotti, PhD, Associate Professor of Economics Werner Troesken, PhD, Professor of Economics Kevin Morrison, PhD, Assistant Professor of GSPIA Dissertation Advisor: Thomas Rawski, PhD, Professor of Economics Luca Rigotti, PhD, Associate Professor of Economics ii ESSAYS ON BUSINESS GROUPS AND THE JUDICIARY IN SOUTH KOREA Hansoo Choi, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 Copyright © by Hansoo Choi 2014 iii ESSAYS ON BUSINESS GROUPS AND THE JUDICIARY IN SOUTH KOREA Hansoo Choi, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 The first chapter explores how the size of a corporation undermines a court’s willingness to mete out tough sentences to corporate criminals, employing a unique dataset of Korean white- collar offenders. I find that the Korean judiciary displays a strong bias towards chaebols, family business groups: the likelihood that convicted chaebol-related defendants receive suspended jail sentences rises compared to that of convicted non-chaebol counterparts. The finding further shows that a greater bias can be observed for the top 10 business groups than for any of the lower ranking chaebols.
    [Show full text]
  • Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd
    Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. (incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Republic of Korea) 14,429,538 Global Depositary Shares Representing 28,859,076 Common Shares Offer Price: US$15.64 per GDS This is an offering of 14,429,538 Global Depositary Shares, or GDSs, representing 28,859,076 common shares, par value W5,000 per share, of Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. (the “Company”). The GDSs are being offered by The Korea Development Bank and the Korea Asset Management Corporation, the Company’s two principal shareholders. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the GDSs by the selling shareholders. Each GDS represents two of the Company’s common shares. The common shares are listed and principally traded on the Korea Stock Exchange under the symbol “42660.KS”. On June 3, 2003, the last reported sale price of the common shares on the Korea Stock Exchange was W9,840 per share, equivalent to a price of US$8.15 per share, assuming an exchange rate of W1,207.5 to US$1.00. Prior to this offering, there has been no market for the GDSs. Application has been made to list the GDSs issued pursuant to this offering on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, although there can be no assurance that the GDSs will be listed on any exchange at the time the GDSs are delivered to the initial purchasers or at any other time. The GDSs are expected to be designated for trading in the PORTALSM System of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Base De Datos De Códigos De Marcas De Vehículos Automotores Y Afines Actualizado Al 03 De Marzo De 2020
    BASE DE DATOS DE CÓDIGOS DE MARCAS DE VEHÍCULOS AUTOMOTORES Y AFINES ACTUALIZADO AL 03 DE MARZO DE 2020 Nombre de marca Código FOREDIL 1 ASTRA 2 KOBELCO 3 ALFA ROMEO 4 ALPINE 5 APRILIA 6 AMBASSADOR 7 LIBERTY 8 A.M.X 9 AEOLUS 10 GORFETT 11 ARO 12 LOTUS 13 ASCORT 14 KRESKE 15 AUDI 16 AUSTIN 17 CURTIS WRIGHT 18 PANGARO 19 ELLIOT MACH 20 MHNCK 21 BENTLEY 22 B.M.W. 23 MACAL 24 BERT 25 BOND 26 BUSH HOG 27 BUICK 28 CADILLAC 29 EUROMOTOS 30 KRAZ 31 CHEVROLET 32 CHRYSLER 33 Nombre de marca Código BARQUARD 34 CITROEN 35 MINZK 36 CLENET 37 CIAO 38 DAF 39 DAIHATSU 40 DAIMLER 41 DATSUN 42 DESMCO 43 DE LOREAN SSS 44 PALI 45 D.K.W. 46 DODGE 47 ENZMAN 48 ESCALIBUR 49 CHARCK 50 FERRARI 51 FIAT 52 CEDARAPIDS 53 FORD 54 FORD-WILLYS 55 CARLIN 56 FRUEHAUF 57 GILBERN 58 ZILL 59 GREMLIN 60 HILLMAN 61 HONDA 62 HORNET 63 HUMBER 64 IMPERIAL 65 INNOCENTI 66 URB3A3 67 INTERNATIONAL 68 ALAB 69 ISUZU 70 JAGUAR 71 Nombre de marca Código JAVELIN 72 JEEP 73 TRAILEZE 74 LAMBORGHINI 75 LANCIA 76 LEYLAND-INNOCENTI 77 TFI 78 LINCOLN 79 COTTRELL 80 STER AZUL 81 MARLIN 82 MASERATI 83 MATADOR 84 MATRA 85 MERCURY 86 M.G. 87 OHIO 88 MITSUBISHI 89 BILLIS 90 MORRIS 91 MOSKOVITCH 92 NISSAN 93 N.S.U. 94 OWENS 95 JINCHENG 96 BETA 97 FSO 98 HAPAG LLOYD 99 TRANS GLOBAL 100 PLYMOUTH 101 PONTIAC 102 PORSCHE 103 SSANG YONG 104 ROVER 105 HARMEN 106 RENAULT 107 BEIJING 108 JIANSHE 109 Nombre de marca Código ROLLS-ROYCE 110 ZIL 111 RUGER 113 SAAB 114 SABRA 115 ORENSTEIN & KOPPEL 116 SCALDIA 117 SHIGULI 118 SIMCA 119 SCHAEFF 120 SKODA 121 FONTA 122 SUBARU 123 SUNBEAM 124 SUZUKI 125 TATSA 126 MORINI 127 THUNDERBIRD 128 FORDSON 129 TOYOTA 130 TRAILER 131 TRIDENT 132 TRIUMPH 133 BB & W 134 CLUB CAR 135 VAUXHALL 136 VOLKSWAGEN 137 VOLVO 138 HYOSUNG 139 PULLMAN 140 GILLI PHANTOM 141 WILLYS 142 WOLSELEY 143 TITAN 144 ZAZ 145 HERITAGE 146 BELLE 147 AUTOCAR 148 Nombre de marca Código ALL AMERICAN 149 ALLIS CHALMER 150 AMERICA MOTOR 151 ARMSTRONG 152 B.M.G.
    [Show full text]
  • WFED595 Lesson9 CV Kwang
    Gangnamgu Nonhyunro 213, Phone: +82-2-2194-9947 / +82-10-5223-6578 102-408 Seoul, Korea E-mail: [email protected] KwangMo Han Overview KwangMo Han is currently a SuccessFactors business development expert in Korea. His major focus on his current position is to create business partnership with HR consulting companies and to position SuccessFactors as the global No.1 HR cloud solution in Korea HR market by thought leadership and related marketing activities. He is also actively supporting SuccessFactors sales plays directly through CHRO networking and HR team communication. KwangMo has totally 19 yrs. experience which includes 1 year SAP experience, 16 yrs. consulting experience and 2 yrs. industry experience. He used to be an Associate Director and the team leader of Global Talent Management at Hanon Systems. His responsibility was to lead Global HR team at Hanon Systems with full responsibility on overall practices of global HR. Prior to Hanon Systems, he used to be a Sr. Consultant of Talent & Reward and the Head of TMOA (talent mgmt. & organization alignment) practice at Towers Watson Seoul. He was also a director of the Korean Society of Management Consulting and a Director of the Korean Corporate Counseling Association in 2013 ~ 2014. KwangMo has various consulting experience in global HR and talent management, like leadership assessment and development, talent acquisition, competency modeling, organization culture, succession planning, global talent management strategy, global job management and Org design, etc. Prior to joining Towers Watson, he worked for Accenture as a human performance consultant and process consultant. He led change management team for ERP project and participated in several HR projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum for Asian Insolvency Reform (FAIR)
    Forum for Asian Insolvency Reform (FAIR) MAXIMISING VALUE OF NON- PERFORMING ASSETS Seoul, Korea 10 - 11 November 2003 Facilitating Out-of-Court Workouts in a Crisis: Lessons From East Asia, 1998-2001 by Mr. William P. Mako, Senior Analyst, Private Sector Development Department The World Bank Facilitating Out-of-Court Workouts in a Crisis: Lessons From East Asia, 1998-2001 By Mr. William P. Mako, The World Bank As seen in the recent East Asia crisis, government responses to a “financial” crisis tend to focus on the resolution of financial sector distress. In fact, financial sector and corporate sector distress are intertwined – especially in cases where debt-fueled over-investment by corporations in low-margin, loss-making, or cyclical businesses encouraged the crisis. Failure to resolve underlying corporate distress through adequate “operational restructuring” risks a diminution of long-term corporate competitiveness and a recurrence of acute corporate distress upon the expiration of crisis-related “financial restructuring” concessions from creditors. Following an introductory discussion of corporate-financial sector linkages and issues in the operational and financial restructuring of distressed corporations (Section I), this chapter summarizes approaches taken in the recent East Asia crisis to out-of-court workouts (Section II) and corporate restructuring results through mid-2001 (Section III). Subsequent discussion of lessons first considers process-related items that should be easy to implement, for example, the organization and operation of creditors committees (Section IV). The chapter concludes by highlighting difficult issues pertaining to the allocation of losses among debtors and creditors: the ability of creditors to impose losses on a debtor; the government’s readiness to force or induce creditors to recognize losses from corporate restructuring; and the resolution of inter-creditor differences on the allocation of losses and risk among creditors (Section V).
    [Show full text]
  • General Motors Corporation
    General Motors Corporation 2009 – 2014 Restructuring Plan Presented to U.S. Department of the Treasury As Required Under Section 7.20 of the Loan and Security Agreement Between General Motors and the U. S. Department of the Treasury Dated December 31, 2008 February 17, 2009 GENERAL MOTORS RESTRUCTURING PLAN HIGHLIGHTS GM’s Plan details a return to sustainable profitability in 24 months o Demonstrates GM‘s viability under conservative economic assumptions o Expands and accelerates the Plan submitted on December 2 o Lowers the Company‘s breakeven to a U.S. market of 11.5-12.0M units annually GM is comprehensively transforming its business, globally o Brands, nameplates and dealer networks streamlined and focused o Productivity and flexibility gains enabling more facility consolidations o Shared global vehicle architectures creating substantial cost savings o Unprofitable foreign operations addressed GM’s Plan emphasizes the Company’s continued focus on great products o ―Fewer, better‖ vehicles in U.S. supporting Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC o Renewed commitment to lead in fuel efficiency, hybrids, advanced propulsion o All major U.S. introductions in 2009-2014 are high-mileage cars and crossovers GM’s Plan calls for considerable sacrifice from all stakeholders o Bondholders and other debtors o Hourly and salaried employees, executives and retirees o Dealers and suppliers o Shareholders GM’s Plan addresses the requirements of the loan agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury o Competitive product mix and cost
    [Show full text]
  • Restructuring of the Chaebols and Financial Sestor in Korea： Progress and Assessment Since the Financial Crises
    Restructuring of the Chaebols and Financial Sestor in Korea： Progress and Assessment Since the Financial Crises Eun Mee Kim, Graduate School of International Studies Ewha Womans Univeristy Joon-Kyung Kim, Korea Development Institute and Jun-Il Kim, Korea Development Institute Working Paper Series Vol. 2000-23 December 2000 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute. No part of this book may be used reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in articles and reviews. For information, please write to the Centre. The International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development, Kitakyushu ICSEAD FINAL REPORT RESTRUCTURING OF THE CHAEBOLS AND FINANCIAL SECTOR IN KOREA: PROGRESS AND ASSESSMENT SINCE THE FINANCIAL CRISIS Eun Mee Kim Graduate School of International Studies Ewha Womans Univeristy Joon-Kyung Kim Korea Development Institute and Jun-Il Kim Korea Development Institute March 2000 ◈ The authors’ names are listed in alphabetical order. ◈ Please direct all correspondence to Professor Eun Mee Kim, Graduate School of International Studies, Ewha Womans University, 11-1 Daehyun-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-750, Korea; Phone 82-2-3277-3669/3651; Fax 82-2-365-0943; E-mail [email protected]; and Dr. Joon-Kyung Kim and Dr. Jun-Il Kim, Korea Development Institute, 207-41 Chongyangri-dong, Dongdaemun-ku, Seoul, Korea; Phone 82-2-958-4044; Fax 82-2-965-0393; E-mail [email protected]. Table of Contents I. Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. Financial Crisis and the Chaebols ------------------------------------------------------- 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Newsletter 11 February 99
    BDA Business Development Asia ASIA IS A BUSINESS IMPERATIVE NOW MORE THAN EVER ASIAN AUTOMOTIVE NEWSLETTER Issue 29, February 2002 A bimonthly newsletter of developments in the auto and auto components markets CONTENTS CHINA/HK INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1 Aisin Takaoka Co of Japan, one of the Toyota CHINA/HK .................................................................. 1 groups core suppliers, has established its first INDIA ............................................................................. 3 company in China. Based in Tianjin, the factory will INDONESIA ................................................................ 3 be operational from Q3 2002 and will make and JAPAN ............................................................................. 3 sell brake parts. The main customer will be Toyotas KOREA ........................................................................... 4 car assembly plant in Tianjin, which is due to be MALAYSIA .................................................................... 4 operational in Q2 2003. Aisin Takaoka (China) TAIWAN ........................................................................ 5 is capitalized at ¥300m (US$2.4m), with Aisin itself THAILAND .................................................................. 5 contributing 51% of the total amount, trading house VIETNAM ..................................................................... 5 Toyota Tsusho Corp 5% and a Taiwanese company OTHER .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KOREA FINANCE Corp Form 424B5 Filed 2012-09-17
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 424B5 Prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5) Filing Date: 2012-09-17 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-12-393161 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER KOREA FINANCE Corp Mailing Address Business Address 16 YEOUIDO-DONG 16 YEOUIDO-DONG CIK:1483135| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:M5 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 YOUNGDEUNGPO-GU YOUNGDEUNGPO-GU Type: 424B5 | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-170866 | Film No.: 121093946 SEOUL M5 150-873 SEOUL M5 150-873 SIC: 8888 Foreign governments 82-2-6922-6831 Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents The information in this preliminary prospectus supplement is not complete and may be changed. A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted. Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5) Registration No. 333-170866 SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2012 PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus Dated June 27, 2012) Korea Finance Corporation US$ 2.25% Notes due 2017 Our US$ aggregate principal amount of notes due 2017 (the Notes) will bear interest at a rate of 2.25% per annum. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 7 and August 7 of each year, beginning on February 7, 2013. The Notes will mature on August 7, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Air-Cooled Chiller
    High Efficiency #1 After Sales USEPA recognized USGBC Charter AHRI Certification Best Green Energy Energy Winner Certification Service Climate Leaders Member USA Corporate Award Award Award Satisfaction Index Company Introduction CONTENTS Company in Brief Carrier 02 l 03 CLK Corporation 04 l 05 Vision 06 Quality Policy 07 Organization 08 Customer Service 09 Product Line-up 10 Key Products Introduction Centrifugal Chiller 12 Screw Chiller / Air Cooled Chiller 13 High Eciency Absorption Chiller 14 l 15 Air Handling Unit 16 System Air conditioner (EHP) 17 Gas Heat Pump (GHP) 18 Rooftop Unit 19 Fan Coil Unit 20 Carrier 02 l 03 Ice Storage System 21 CLK Corporation 04 l 05 Automated Control System 22 Vision 06 Sales Records Company in Brief Quality Policy 07 Centrifugal Chiller 24 l 25 Organization 08 Ice Storage System 25 Customer Service 09 Screw Chiller 25 Product Line-up 10 High Eciency Absorption Chiller 26 Air Handilng Unit 27 System Air Conditioner(EHP) 28 l 29 l 30 Gas Heat Pump 30 EHP Air Handling Unit 30 Rooftop Unit 31 Fan Coil Unit 32 Constant Temperature & Humidity 32 Ventilation Unit 32 Nuclear Power Plant 33 Thermal Electric Power Plant 33 Certificates & Business License CEO Career 35 Certicates & License 36 l 37 l 38 l 39 CLK Corporation 02 03 Carrier Carrier is a world-leading HVAC company. Carrier is a global corporation, manufacturing and supplying HVAC products for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. Carrier is also providing service and components for air conditioning products, refrigeration products, and transportation products. Company Foundation Founded by Dr. Willis Carrier, Inventor of air conditioning system in 1902 in New York Company Organization Carrier has 78 manufacturing facilities over the world and research and development institutes established regionally.
    [Show full text]
  • OCI (010060 KS) Chemicals
    April 4, 2011 Company Report OCI (010060 KS) Chemicals Polysilicon price to exceed expectations Yeonju Park +822-768-3061 [email protected] Initiate coverage with Buy call and TP of W670,000 Hannah Yoon We initiate our coverage on OCI with a Buy call and a target price of W670,000 +822-768-4161 (based on a 2011F P/E of 15x; the value of the polysilicon business was derived by [email protected] applying a target EV/EBITDA of 8x to the average of its 2011F~2013F EBITDAs). Considering OCI is forecast to show a CAGR of a whopping 53% until 2012, we believe that our optimistic 2011 earnings forecasts are reasonable. Greater-than-expected solar power demand to drive up polysilicon prices In 2011, solar power demand is anticipated to exceed the market consensus forecast. In the aftermath of the earthquake in Japan, major European nations and the U.S. are likely to maintain generous subsidies for the solar power industry. With Buy (Initiate) a drop in installation costs, generous subsidies would result in a higher internal rate Target Price (12M, W) 670,000 of return, which would drive demand, as in 2010. Share Price (04/01/11, W) 498,000 Expected Return (%): 34.5 34.5 Strong solar power demand should further tighten the already-tight supply of EPS Growth (11F, %) 65.8 polysilicon. In the polysilicon market, only a few firms with cost and quality Market EPS Growth (11F, %) 20.9 competitiveness are capable of achieving aggressive capacity expansion. In light of P/E (X) 11.2 OCIÊs high quality products and strong cost competitiveness (two key elements of Market P/E (04/01/11F, x) 10.8 its polysilicon businessÊ competitiveness), we believe that the company will be able KOSPI(04/01/11F) 2,121.01 to maintain its competitive position in both the near term and the long term.
    [Show full text]
  • La Creación De La Ventaja Comparativa En La Industria Automovilistica Española, 1898-1996
    Jordi Catalan La creación de la ventaja comparativa en la industria automovilistica española, 1898-1996 JORDICATALAN* Universitat de Barcelona A finales del siglo XX, la fabricación de automóviles en España alcanzaba el billón de pesetas de supéravit comercial (cuatro veces más que el calzado o la cerimica, las siguientes industrias más exitosas en el exterior). Este trabajo ana- liza las causas teóricas y las evidencias empíricas que explican la formación de la actual ventaja comparativa en la automoción. Parte del estudio de 10s procesos de relocalización internacional de la industria del motor e inscribe el caso espa- Bol en las grandes etapas de desarrollo de dicha actividad. Arranque del automóvil estandarizado e inicios de la industria en España, 1898-1928 En 1928 España ocupaba el décimoquinto lugar del ranking mundial en número de automóviles construidos (Cuadro I), rango bastante peor que el de su PIB per capita (décimosegunda posición)'. El dato sugiere un diagnóstico mode- radamente pesimista de la experiencia hispana al inicio de la estandarización de la industria. No obstante, el pesimismo debe ser matizado habida cuenta del redu- cido número de paises productores (s610 diecisiete) y el carácter periférico del proceso de industrialización español. Este trabajo se ha beneficiado del apoyo financiero de la Dirección General de Investigación del Ministeri0 de Ciencia y Tecnologia (proyecto PB98-1187) y de la Fundación Eduardo Barreiros. Agradezco ayuda y sugerencias de Antonio M. Bernal, Luis M. Bilbao, José Luis Garcia Ruiz, Antonio Gómez Mendoza, Juan Hernández Andreu, José Luis Hernández Marco, Miguel Angel Martinez Sevilla, S6nia Monteagudo, Jordi Nadal, Pere Pascual, Manuel Santos, Elena San Romhn, Carles Sudria y dos evaluadores de la Revista de Historia Industrial.
    [Show full text]