DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Budget & Appropriations Ordinance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Budget & Appropriations Ordinance 2013 ANNUAL BUDGET & APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE GREATER ROCKFORD AIRPORT AUTHORITY • FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OF 2013 • ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS CHICAGO ROCKFORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Mission The Chicago Rockford International Airport exists to create regional economic opportunities through global aviation. Vision We will leverage our asset base to achieve significant growth in the following areas: Cargo Service – to increase national ranking in gross landed weight. Passenger Aviation – to provide a high level of hassle‐free customer satisfaction with additional destinations in niche markets. General and Corporate Aviation – to maintain, support and encourage expansion. Economic Development – to provide economic opportunities for growth. Education, Research and Development Initiatives – to leverage facility and available resources to enhance local aerospace initiatives in both the public and private sectors. Table of Contents TRANSMITTAL LETTER Budget Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 1 Overview and Economic Conditions ........................................................................................ 2 Budget Summary ....................................................................................................................... 6 History ............................................................................................................................. 6 Organization ............................................................................................................................ 8 Strategic Plan .......................................................................................................................... 11 Financial Policies .................................................................................................................... 14 Budget Document ................................................................................................................... 19 Budget Process ........................................................................................................................ 19 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award ............................................................................. 20 Revenue ............................................................................................................................... 22 Expenditures . .......................................................................................................................... 23 Debt Service ........................................................................................................................... 25 Capital Improvement Program ................................................................................................ 26 Net Assets .......................................................................................................................... 28 Designated Assets ................................................................................................................... 28 Acknowledgement .................................................................................................................. 30 BUDGET SUMMARY Summary ............................................................................................................................... 31 REVENUE OPERATING Summary ............................................................................................................................... 32 Budget ............................................................................................................................... 34 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 35 OPERATING EXPENSES Summary ............................................................................................................................... 39 Combined Departmental Budgets........................................................................................... 40 Finance and Administration Department Summary ............................................................................................................................... 42 Budget ............................................................................................................................... 45 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 46 Facilities and Maintenance Department Summary ............................................................................................................................... 51 Budget ............................................................................................................................... 53 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 55 Operations Department Summary ............................................................................................................................... 61 Budget ............................................................................................................................... 63 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 64 Marketing Department Summary ............................................................................................................................... 67 Budget ............................................................................................................................... 69 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 70 Terminal Service Department Summary ............................................................................................................................... 73 Budget ............................................................................................................................... 75 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 76 AirFest Department Summary ............................................................................................................................... 79 Budget ............................................................................................................................... 81 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 82 Cargo Development Department Summary ............................................................................................................................... 86 Budget ............................................................................................................................... 87 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 88 Passenger Development Department Summary ............................................................................................................................... 90 Budget ............................................................................................................................... 92 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 93 NON‐OPERATING REVENUES AND EXPENSES Budget ............................................................................................................................... 96 Justifications ........................................................................................................................... 97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................................... 98 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Tentative Budget and Appropriation Ordinance ................................................... 107 Exhibit 2 Rate & Charges Ordinance .................................................................................... 109 Exhibit 3 Acronym and Glossary of Terms ............................................................................ 111 Exhibit 4 Statistics ................................................................................................................. 116 Exhibit 5 Fiscal Year 2013 Budget and Appropriation Ordinance ........................................ 122 July 27, 2012 The Honorable Chairman and Board of Commissioners Greater Rockford Airport Authority 60 Airport Drive Rockford, IL 61109 Dear Mr. Chairman and Commissioners: Respectfully presented is the annual budget of the Greater Rockford Airport Authority (Authority) as approved by the Board of Commissioners July 26, 2012. The Authority operates the Chicago Rockfford International Airport (RFD). The budget includes plans and resources to move toward the strategic goals, which were approveed in January by our Board of Commissioners with a new mission and vision to market RFD on many fronts. This includes continued efforts to grow passengers, promote the annual AirFest and gain recognition as one of the region’s premier events that allows us to showcase the many assets of RFD and make the RFD cargo capabilities known across the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hooters Air: Hot Wings Don't
    Journal of Business Cases and Applications Volume 15, December, 2015 Hooters Air: Hot wings don’t fly Dennis Kimerer The University of Tampa Hauimu Xing The University of Tampa Steven Lewis The University of Tampa Erika Matulich The University of Tampa Melissa Walters The University of Tampa Phil Michaels The University of Tampa ABSTRACT This instructional case is designed to develop students’ understanding of growth strategies, segment focusing, target market buying behavior, and brand expansion. The case explores a failed attempt at brand expansion by Hooters, a popular American restaurant chain that attempted to diversify into the airline industry. Hooters entered a highly competitive yet stagnant growth airline industry in 2003 as Hooters Air, targeting itself toward vacationers and golfers. Hooters Air sought to differentiate itself from other carriers with specialized flight destinations, a distinctive style of in-flight service, and first-class seating at an affordable price. After facing numerous challenges, including sky-rocketing fuel costs and general brand confusion, Hooters Air folded its wings in early 2006. The failure of Hooters Air is considered an ill-fated example of brand expansion. Keywords: Hooters Air, brand extension, marketing segmentation/positioning, diversification, marketing growth strategy Copyright statement: Authors retain the copyright to the manuscripts published in AABRI journals. Please see the AABRI Copyright Policy at http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html Hooters Air, Page 1 Journal of Business Cases and Applications Volume 15, December, 2015 TARGETED COURSES AND LEARNING OBJECTIVES This case is suitable for both undergraduate and graduate courses in marketing, management or entrepreneurship, as well as courses in which students are studying business strategies and marketing planning topics such as marketing growth strategy, branding strategy/brand expansion, new product introduction, market segmentation/positioning, and entrepreneurship.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation
    Darienite News for Darien https://darienite.com Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation Author : David Gurliacci Categories : Opinion, Transportation Tagged as : Cameron on Air Travel 2019, Cameron on Transportation, Cameron on Transportation 2019, Cameron on Transportation History 2019, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column 2019 Date : July 12, 2019 Rail fans call them “fallen flags.” They are railroads that no longer exist, like the original New Haven and New York Central railroads. But before I start getting all misty eyed, let’s also pay homage to airlines that have flown away into history. 1 / 3 Darienite There’s PEOPLExpress, the domestic discount airline that flew out of Newark’s grungy old North Terminal startingNews infor 1981. Darien Fares were dirt cheap, collected on-board during the flight and checked bags cost $3. You https://darienite.comeven had to pay for sodas and snacks. The airline expanded too fast, even adding a 747 to its fleet for $99 flights to Brussels, and was eventually merged with Continental under its rapacious Chairman Frank Lorenzo, later banished from the industry by the Department of Transportation. There were any number of smaller, regional airlines that merged or just folded their wings, including Mohawk, Northeast, Southeast, Midway, L’Express, Independence Air, Air California, PSA and a personal favorite, Midwest Express, started by the Kimberly Clark paper company to shuttle employees between its mills and headquarters in Milwaukee. Midwest flew DC-9s, usually fitted with coach seats in a 2-and-3 configuration, but equipped instead with business-class 2-and-2 leather seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Competition Plan Update Summary II. Gate Utilization Assessment for 2003 III. Gate Availability A. Status of Negotiations (Terminal A) B. Terminal B Gate Activity IV. Leasing and Subleasing Arrangements A. New Entry Manager B. Security Deposit C. Airline Service Standards Provision D. Requesting Airline Provision E. Oversight of Subleasing Fees V. Gate Assignment Policy A. Communication to Master Airlines B. Real Time Gate Utilization VI. Construction and Common Use Facilities A. Expansion of Terminal A B. PFC Funding VII. Website VIII. New Entrant Guidelines The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport COMPETITION PLAN UPDATE SUMMARY As mandated by the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21), Newark Liberty International Airport is one of several large hub airports required to submit updates to its competition plan. The last update was submitted in March 2002 and accepted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in a letter dated August 22, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2002 Airport Statistics
    DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TOTAL OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC JULY 2005 JULY YEAR TO DATE % OF % OF % GRAND % GRAND INCR./ INCR./ TOTAL INCR./ INCR./ TOTAL 2005 2004 DECR. DECR. 2005 2005 (9) 2004 (10) DECR. DECR. 2005 OPERATIONS (1) Air Carrier 34,854 29,603 5,251 17.7% 66.8% 223,532 191,572 31,960 16.7% 67.7% Air Taxi 16,111 20,598 -4,487 -21.8% 30.9% 100,471 135,431 -34,960 -25.8% 30.4% Military 75 72 3 4.2% 0.1% 570 509 61 12.0% 0.2% General Aviation 1,168 1,119 49 4.4% 2.2% 5,481 5,909 -428 -7.2% 1.7% TOTAL 52,208 51,392 816 1.6% 100.0% 330,054 333,421 -3,367 -1.0% 100.0% PASSENGERS (2) Internationals (3) In 74,790 52,906 21,884 41.4% 511,276 356,717 154,559 43.3% Out 67,721 47,977 19,744 41.2% 497,820 349,427 148,393 42.5% TOTAL 142,511 100,883 41,628 41.3% 3.3% 1,009,096 706,144 302,952 42.9% 4.0% Majors (4) In 1,254,889 1,386,504 -131,615 -9.5% 7,590,575 8,096,122 -505,547 -6.2% Out 1,253,783 1,379,878 -126,095 -9.1% 7,614,477 8,128,484 -514,007 -6.3% TOTAL 2,508,672 2,766,382 -257,710 -9.3% 58.7% 15,205,052 16,224,606 -1,019,554 -6.3% 59.9% Nationals (5) In 489,607 413,438 76,169 18.4% 2,661,428 2,443,840 217,588 8.9% Out 491,895 412,756 79,139 19.2% 2,671,205 2,454,089 217,116 8.8% TOTAL 981,502 826,194 155,308 18.8% 23.0% 5,332,633 4,897,929 434,704 8.9% 21.0% Regionals (6) In 309,776 256,803 52,973 20.6% 1,862,603 1,463,929 398,674 27.2% Out 314,385 265,777 48,608 18.3% 1,873,269 1,454,854 418,415 28.8% TOTAL 624,161 522,580 101,581 19.4% 14.6% 3,735,872 2,918,783 817,089 28.0% 14.7% Supplementals (7) In 9,343 7,982 1,361 17.1%
    [Show full text]
  • Air Service & Economic Development
    AIR SERVICE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CALED Conference March 23, 2017 – San Diego, CA © 2017 Mead & Hunt, Inc. TOPICS 2 . Airline industry update . Air service development overview . Purpose . Approach . Community partnerships/economic impact . Airline assistance . Summary AIRLINE INDUSTRY UPDATE INDUSTRY CONSOLIDATION 4 Top 5 Control approximately 87% of U.S. Domestic Market through M&As Today American Delta Southwest United Alaska US Virgin American TWA Delta Northwest AirTran ATA Southwest Continental United Alaska Airways America US Trump Morris Pan Am Jet American Reno Air America Ozark Delta Pan Am Northwest ValuJet ATA Southwest Continental United Airways Shuttle West Air Pacific America People Allegheny Piedmont Western National Republic Muse Air Express Horizon Air Cal PSA Frontier Florida Airlines (1982) Eastern Airlines (1991) Vanguard (2002) Skybus (2008) Other Notable Braniff Airways (1982) Midway Airlines (1991) Independence Air (2005) Aloha (2008) Defunct Airlines Air Florida (1984) Western Pacific (1998) Hooters Air (2006) DRIVES CAPACITY CONSOLIDATION 5 81% of the market is Only 19% of the market is controlled by 4 airlines controlled by all other carriers Spirit United 15% 16% JetBlue Southwest 23% 21% Frontier 10% Other 19% Hawaiian 7% Delta 21% Allegiant Alaska 8% American 30% All 23% Others 7% Source: Diio Mi Scheduled U.S. Domestic Seats for YE June 2017 UNPRECEDENTED CAPACITY DISCIPLINE 6 $60B in Losses $70B in Profits 90% 950,000 85% Seats (000s) 925,000 80% Load Factor 900,000 75% 875,000 70% 850,000 65% 60% 825,000 800,000 Load Factor Load 55% Seats (000s) Seats 50% 775,000 45% 750,000 . Other than the brief period after 9-11, the US industry had shown little interest in moderating capacity growth .
    [Show full text]
  • Year 2035 Long-Range Transportation Plan Rockford Area
    Year 2035 Long-Range Transportation Plan Rockford Area Transportation Study YEAR 2035 LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN for the ROCKFORD AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY METROPOLITAN PLANNING AREA JULY 28, 2005 This Plan was prepared as a cooperative effort between Rockford Area Transportation Study T.Y. Lin International and The al-Chalabi Group, Ltd. POLICY COMMITTEE Mayor Lawrence J. Morrissey – City of Rockford Mayor Darryl F. Lindberg – City of Loves Park Board Chairman Scott H. Christiansen – Winnebago County President Linda M. Vaughn – Village of Machesney Park Mayor Frederic C. Brereton – City of Belvidere Board Chairman Susan L. Anderson – Boone County Deputy Director Gregory L. Mounts – Illinois Department of Transportation, Region 2 Federal law requires this Plan to be updated every five years. This Plan can be amended or updated at any time. Comments and proposed refinements or changes should be directed as follows. Rockford Area Transportation Study Rockford City Hall 425 East State Street, Rockford, Illinois 61104 Phone: 815-987-5570 FAX: 815-967-7058 Document website: http://cityofrockford.net/government/works/index.cfm?section=planning&id=977 Rockford Area Transportation Study Year 2035 – Long-Range Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS......................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background
    [Show full text]
  • March/April – 2006 1 PERPETUAL CALENDAR 2006 JULY 5-9 International Ninety-Nines Conference, APRIL Washington, D.C., Marriott Hotel
    99 News – March/April – 2006 1 PERPETUAL CALENDAR 2006 JULY 5-9 International Ninety-Nines Conference, APRIL Washington, D.C., Marriott Hotel. 99 News 1 Deadline for the May/June issue of 6-23 National Cross Country Air Races. Handi- 99 News. capped speed racing open to all pilots and all piston aircraft. July 16-18, Hutchinson To list your 99s events 4-10 Sun ’n Fun, Lakeland, Florida. Stop by The 300, Hutchinson, Kansas; July 19-21, 1800 on this calendar page, Ninety-Nines building and visit with Mile Marion Jayne Air Race, Hutchinson, send information to: WASP. Contact www.sun-n-fun.org. KS-HUT, Akron, CO-AKO, Rapid City, SD- The 99 News 23-24 New York/New Jersey Spring Section RAP, Wolf Point, MT-OLF, Devils Lake, ND- DVL, Orr, MN-ORR, Stevens Point, WI-STE; 4300 Amelia Earhart Rd. Meeting, Newark, NJ. Hosted by the West- ern New York Chapter. July 21-23, Wisconsin 300, Stevens Point, Oklahoma City, OK Wisconsin. Free entry kit on line at 73159-1140 28-29 North Central Spring Section Meeting, www.us-airrace.org. Kansas City, MO. Email: 19-21 Marion Jayne Air Race, Hutchinson, KS- [email protected] 28-30 Southeast Spring Section Meeting, HUT, Akron, CO-AKO, Rapid City, SD-RAP, Online Form: Fayetteville, NC. Contact Stephanie Hahn, Wolf Point, MT-OLF, Devils Lake, ND-DVL, www.ninety-nines.org/ 913-980-1590. Orr, MN-ORR, Stevens Point, WI-STE. In- 99newsreports.html 28-30 Mid-Atlantic Section Meeting, Holiday formation: [email protected]. Please indicate the Inn, Greenfield Road, Lancaster, PA.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrative Assessment of the Commercial Air Transportation System Via Adaptive Agents
    AN INTEGRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM VIA ADAPTIVE AGENTS A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Choon Giap Lim In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology December 2008 Copyright c 2008 by Choon Giap Lim AN INTEGRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM VIA ADAPTIVE AGENTS Approved by: Dr. Dimitri N. Mavris, Advisor Dr. Daniel Schrage School of Aerospace Engineering School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jung-Ho Lewe Mr. Kurt Neitzke School of Aerospace Engineering Langley Research Center Georgia Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration (NASA) Dr. Hojong Baik Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Missouri University of Science and Technology Date Approved: August 22, 2008 To my family, for their love, patience, and unwavering support iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend thanks to my adviser, Dr. Dimitri Mavris, who has provided invaluable advice, encouragement, and support throughout the years. To Dr. Jung- Ho Lewe, for his guidance in the research work for this dissertation. To Mr. Kurt Neitzke, Dr. Hojong Baik, and Dr. Daniel Schrage, for sharing their wealth of knowledge. To Dr. Daniel DeLaurentis and Dr. Elena Garcia for their mentorship during my early years at Georgia Tech. I would like to also thank my friends, Eunsuk, Timothy, Xin Yuan, and Joseph, who have helped carry me along in this journey, shared with me their knowledge and most importantly their friendship. Most importantly, I owe what I have achieved today to the unwavering support from my parents, Victor and Anne, who have given me the inspiration and confidence from the very beginning and continued to support me till the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Regional Air Service Initiative Handbook
    Northwest Regional Air Service Initiative Handbook Small Community Air Service Development empowering pacific northwest communities Northwest Regional Air Service Initiative Handbook These materials are sponsored by Oregon Department of Aviation Washington Department of Transportation – Aviation Oregon Airport Management Association Washington Airport Management Association US Department of Transportation © Mead & Hunt, Inc. 2006 Table of contents Section 1 Section 4 An overview of the Northwest Regional Airline types and their potential for air Air Service Initiative (NWRASI) service development Introduction . 1 Legacy airlines . 11 Background . 1 Low-cost airlines . 12 NWRASI goals . 2 Select airlines . 13 NWRASI plan . 2 Regional airlines . 13 Phase I . Small Community Air Service Other airlines . 14 Development Tool Kit . 2 Summary of main points . 14 Phase II . Small Community Air Service Market Analysis . 3 Section 5 Phase III . Oregon–Washington Small The importance of airline partnerships Community Air Service Strategies . 3 Marketing Agreements . 15 Summary of main points . 3 Codeshares and their role . 15 Interline Agreements . 16 Section 2 Contract and at-risk agreements . 16 Air service contributions to economy and lifestyle Summary of main points . 17 Contribution to the overall economy . 5 Contribution to local businesses . 6 Section 6 Contribution to quality of life . 6 Kinds of aircraft and their fit with small communities Summary of main points . 6 Aircraft economics . 19 Matching aircraft to markets . 20 Section 3 Jet versus turboprop orders and replacements . 20 e v i Industry status and impact on air service t Regional airline fleet trends . 21 a i An industry struggling financially . 7 t i Service providers and aircraft . 21 n I The 9-11 hangover .
    [Show full text]
  • UFTAA Congress Kuala Lumpur 2013
    UFTAA Congress Kuala Lumpur 2013 Duncan Bureau Senior Vice President Global Sales & Distribution The Airline industry is tough "If I was at Kitty Hawk in 1903 when Orville Wright took off, and would have been farsighted enough, and public-spirited enough -- I owed it to future capitalists -- to shoot them down…” Warren Buffet US Airline Graveyard – A Only AAXICO Airlines (1946 - 1965, to Saturn Airways) Air General Access Air (1998 - 2001) Air Great Lakes ADI Domestic Airlines Air Hawaii (1960s) Aeroamerica (1974 – 1982) Air Hawaii (ceased Operations in 1986) Aero Coach (1983 – 1991) Air Hyannix Aero International Airlines Air Idaho Aeromech Airlines (1951 - 1983, to Wright Airlines) Air Illinois AeroSun International Air Iowa AFS Airlines Airlift International (1946 - 81) Air America (operated by the CIA in SouthEast Asia) Air Kentucky Air America (1980s) Air LA Air Astro Air-Lift Commuter Air Atlanta (1981 - 88) Air Lincoln Air Atlantic Airlines Air Link Airlines Air Bama Air Link Airways Air Berlin, Inc. (1978 – 1990) Air Metro Airborne Express (1946 - 2003, to DHL) Air Miami Air California, later AirCal (1967 - 87, to American) Air Michigan Air Carolina Air Mid-America Air Central (Michigan) Air Midwest Air Central (Oklahoma) Air Missouri Air Chaparral (1980 - 82) Air Molakai (1980) Air Chico Air Molakai (1990) Air Colorado Air Molakai-Tropic Airlines Air Cortez Air Nebraska Air Florida (1972 - 84) Air Nevada Air Gemini Air New England (1975 - 81) US Airline Graveyard – Still A Air New Orleans (1981 – 1988) AirVantage Airways Air
    [Show full text]
  • It's More Than Just the Perceived Exploitation of Women
    Journal of Case Research in Business and Economics It’s more than just the perceived exploitation of women. Contemporary issues facing Hooters restaurants Michael Brizek South Carolina State University ABSTRACT Hooters of America and Hooters International share rights to a brand that has emerged as a powerful force in the branding game over the past twenty-four years. This case study will examine, while focusing almost solely on Hooters of America, the history of the organization, the operational domain in which it functions, the service style found at the restaurant, the management structure found at the unit level, the breadth of the organization, and various operations within the restaurant. Outside of the unit level, the external environment surrounding this organization will be discussed with a focus on competition and current state of the segment in which Hooters operates. The study will conclude with a discussion of the problems facing Hooters of America and various discussion questions. Keywords: Hooters, exploitation, sexual harassment, sexual discrimination It’s more than just the perceived, Page 1 Journal of Case Research in Business and Economics OVERVIEW OF THE ORGANIZATION Company History When examining an organization that has created such a stir over the past few decades, one must first discuss the company from its inception then continue on to describe its growth process into what it has become today. According to a 2003 article in Fortune Magazine, the organization began like many others in the industry had before it, as a great idea derived from the minds of eager entrepreneurs (Heylar, 2003). It was 1983 and six friends were enjoying each others company in Clearwater, Florida when the light bulb went off.
    [Show full text]
  • Unemployment Insurance Program Letter No. 30-02, Change 2
    CLASSIFICATION EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION OWS CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL ADVISORY SYSTEM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DUO Washington, D. C. 20210 ISSUE DATE April 25, 2003 RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE None Continuing ADVISORY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 30-02 Change 2 TO : ALL STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES FROM : CHERYL ATKINSON Administrator Office of Workforce Security SUBJECT : Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation (TEUC) Act of 2002 - Additional TEUC for Displaced Airline and Related Workers 1. Purpose. To provide State Workforce Agencies (SWAs) instructions for implementing the changes to the TEUC program related to displaced airline and related workers. 2. References. Title II of the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002 (The Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002), Public Law 107-147; Public Law 108-1; UIPL No. 30-02 dated July 5, 2002; UIPL No. 30-02 Change 1 dated January 9, 2003; Section 4002 of Public Law 108-11, signed by the President on April 16, 2003; Section 205 of the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended; Section 233 of the Trade Act of 1974; 20 CFR Part 615; ET Handbook No. 401; ET Handbook No. 410. 3. Summary. Section 4002 of P.L. 108-11 creates special rules for determining TEUC eligibility for certain displaced airline and related workers, who were separated for one of the specified reasons from a qualifying base period employer on or after September 11, 2001. In brief, such workers will qualify for up to 39 weeks of basic TEUC (henceforth “TEUC-A”), plus up to 13 weeks of TEUC-X (henceforth “TEUC-AX”).
    [Show full text]