January 2002 Airport Statistics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hooters Air: Hot Wings Don't
Journal of Business Cases and Applications Volume 15, December, 2015 Hooters Air: Hot wings don’t fly Dennis Kimerer The University of Tampa Hauimu Xing The University of Tampa Steven Lewis The University of Tampa Erika Matulich The University of Tampa Melissa Walters The University of Tampa Phil Michaels The University of Tampa ABSTRACT This instructional case is designed to develop students’ understanding of growth strategies, segment focusing, target market buying behavior, and brand expansion. The case explores a failed attempt at brand expansion by Hooters, a popular American restaurant chain that attempted to diversify into the airline industry. Hooters entered a highly competitive yet stagnant growth airline industry in 2003 as Hooters Air, targeting itself toward vacationers and golfers. Hooters Air sought to differentiate itself from other carriers with specialized flight destinations, a distinctive style of in-flight service, and first-class seating at an affordable price. After facing numerous challenges, including sky-rocketing fuel costs and general brand confusion, Hooters Air folded its wings in early 2006. The failure of Hooters Air is considered an ill-fated example of brand expansion. Keywords: Hooters Air, brand extension, marketing segmentation/positioning, diversification, marketing growth strategy Copyright statement: Authors retain the copyright to the manuscripts published in AABRI journals. Please see the AABRI Copyright Policy at http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html Hooters Air, Page 1 Journal of Business Cases and Applications Volume 15, December, 2015 TARGETED COURSES AND LEARNING OBJECTIVES This case is suitable for both undergraduate and graduate courses in marketing, management or entrepreneurship, as well as courses in which students are studying business strategies and marketing planning topics such as marketing growth strategy, branding strategy/brand expansion, new product introduction, market segmentation/positioning, and entrepreneurship. -
Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation
Darienite News for Darien https://darienite.com Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation Author : David Gurliacci Categories : Opinion, Transportation Tagged as : Cameron on Air Travel 2019, Cameron on Transportation, Cameron on Transportation 2019, Cameron on Transportation History 2019, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column 2019 Date : July 12, 2019 Rail fans call them “fallen flags.” They are railroads that no longer exist, like the original New Haven and New York Central railroads. But before I start getting all misty eyed, let’s also pay homage to airlines that have flown away into history. 1 / 3 Darienite There’s PEOPLExpress, the domestic discount airline that flew out of Newark’s grungy old North Terminal startingNews infor 1981. Darien Fares were dirt cheap, collected on-board during the flight and checked bags cost $3. You https://darienite.comeven had to pay for sodas and snacks. The airline expanded too fast, even adding a 747 to its fleet for $99 flights to Brussels, and was eventually merged with Continental under its rapacious Chairman Frank Lorenzo, later banished from the industry by the Department of Transportation. There were any number of smaller, regional airlines that merged or just folded their wings, including Mohawk, Northeast, Southeast, Midway, L’Express, Independence Air, Air California, PSA and a personal favorite, Midwest Express, started by the Kimberly Clark paper company to shuttle employees between its mills and headquarters in Milwaukee. Midwest flew DC-9s, usually fitted with coach seats in a 2-and-3 configuration, but equipped instead with business-class 2-and-2 leather seats. -
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Competition Plan Update Summary II. Gate Utilization Assessment for 2003 III. Gate Availability A. Status of Negotiations (Terminal A) B. Terminal B Gate Activity IV. Leasing and Subleasing Arrangements A. New Entry Manager B. Security Deposit C. Airline Service Standards Provision D. Requesting Airline Provision E. Oversight of Subleasing Fees V. Gate Assignment Policy A. Communication to Master Airlines B. Real Time Gate Utilization VI. Construction and Common Use Facilities A. Expansion of Terminal A B. PFC Funding VII. Website VIII. New Entrant Guidelines The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport COMPETITION PLAN UPDATE SUMMARY As mandated by the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21), Newark Liberty International Airport is one of several large hub airports required to submit updates to its competition plan. The last update was submitted in March 2002 and accepted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in a letter dated August 22, 2002. -
FR Doc 04-25267
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2004 / Notices 65627 11. Atlantic Southeast Airlines (ASA) DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND C. Subpart I 12. Big Sky Airlines URBAN DEVELOPMENT D. Construction and Safety Standards 13. Boston and Maine Airways E. Installation Standards 14. Cape Air (Hyannis Air Service) [Docket No. FR–4665–N–20] F. Accessibility—Universal Design— 15. Caribbean Air Meeting of the Manufactured Housing Visitability 16. Casino Airlines Consensus Committee G. Public Testimony 17. Casino Express TEM Enterprises H. Reports and Actions on Committee 18. Champion Air (Grand Holdings) AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Work 19. Chautauqua Airlines Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing I. Adjourn 20. Chicago Express Airlines Commissioner, HUD. Dated: November 9, 2004. 21. Colgan Air ACTION: Notice of upcoming meeting. John C. Weicher, 22. Comair, Inc. 23. Commutair (Champlain Ent.) SUMMARY: This advises the public of an Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal 24. Continental Airlines Inc. upcoming meeting of the Manufactured Housing Commissioner. 25. Continental Micronesia Inc. Housing Consensus Committee (the [FR Doc. 04–25389 Filed 11–10–04; 11:36 26. Corporate Airlines Committee) and publishes the schedule am] 27. Delta Air Lines Inc. and proposed agenda for the meeting. BILLING CODE 4210–27–P 28. Executive Airlines/American Eagle The meeting is open to the public and 29. Expressjet Airlines (Cont. Express) the site is accessible to individuals with 30. Falcon Air Express disabilities. INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION 31. Freedom Air DATES: The Committee will meet on Sunshine Act Meeting 32. Freedom Airlines November 30, 2004 and December 1, 33. Frontier Airlines 2004, from 8 a.m. -
Chapter Iv Regionals/Commuters
CHAPTER IV REGIONALS/COMMUTERS For purposes of the Federal Aviation REVIEW OF 20032 Administration (FAA) forecasts, air carriers that are included as part of the regional/commuter airline industry meet three criteria. First, a The results for the regional/commuter industry for regional/commuter carrier flies a majority of their 2003 reflect the continuation of a trend that started available seat miles (ASMs) using aircraft having with the events of September 11th and have been 70 seats or less. Secondly, the service provided by drawn out by the Iraq War and Severe Acute these carriers is primarily regularly scheduled Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). These “shocks” to passenger service. Thirdly, the primary mission of the system have led to the large air carriers posting the carrier is to provide connecting service for its losses in passengers for 3 years running. The code-share partners. losses often reflect diversions in traffic to the regional/commuter carriers. These carriers During 2003, 75 reporting regional/commuter recorded double-digit growth in both capacity and airlines met this definition. Monthly traffic data for traffic for the second time in as many years. History 10 of these carriers was compiled from the has demonstrated that the regional/commuter Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Form 41 industry endures periods of uncertainty better than and T-100 filings. Traffic for the remaining the larger air carriers. During the oil embargo of 65 carriers was compiled solely from T-100 filings. 1 1973, the recession in 1990, and the Gulf War in Prior to fiscal year 2003, 10 regionals/commuters 1991, the regional/commuter industry consistently reported on DOT Form 41 while 65 smaller outperformed the larger air carriers. -
January 2002 Airport Statistics
DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TOTAL OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC JULY 2005 JULY YEAR TO DATE % OF % OF % GRAND % GRAND INCR./ INCR./ TOTAL INCR./ INCR./ TOTAL 2005 2004 DECR. DECR. 2005 2005 (9) 2004 (10) DECR. DECR. 2005 OPERATIONS (1) Air Carrier 34,854 29,603 5,251 17.7% 66.8% 223,532 191,572 31,960 16.7% 67.7% Air Taxi 16,111 20,598 -4,487 -21.8% 30.9% 100,471 135,431 -34,960 -25.8% 30.4% Military 75 72 3 4.2% 0.1% 570 509 61 12.0% 0.2% General Aviation 1,168 1,119 49 4.4% 2.2% 5,481 5,909 -428 -7.2% 1.7% TOTAL 52,208 51,392 816 1.6% 100.0% 330,054 333,421 -3,367 -1.0% 100.0% PASSENGERS (2) Internationals (3) In 74,790 52,906 21,884 41.4% 511,276 356,717 154,559 43.3% Out 67,721 47,977 19,744 41.2% 497,820 349,427 148,393 42.5% TOTAL 142,511 100,883 41,628 41.3% 3.3% 1,009,096 706,144 302,952 42.9% 4.0% Majors (4) In 1,254,889 1,386,504 -131,615 -9.5% 7,590,575 8,096,122 -505,547 -6.2% Out 1,253,783 1,379,878 -126,095 -9.1% 7,614,477 8,128,484 -514,007 -6.3% TOTAL 2,508,672 2,766,382 -257,710 -9.3% 58.7% 15,205,052 16,224,606 -1,019,554 -6.3% 59.9% Nationals (5) In 489,607 413,438 76,169 18.4% 2,661,428 2,443,840 217,588 8.9% Out 491,895 412,756 79,139 19.2% 2,671,205 2,454,089 217,116 8.8% TOTAL 981,502 826,194 155,308 18.8% 23.0% 5,332,633 4,897,929 434,704 8.9% 21.0% Regionals (6) In 309,776 256,803 52,973 20.6% 1,862,603 1,463,929 398,674 27.2% Out 314,385 265,777 48,608 18.3% 1,873,269 1,454,854 418,415 28.8% TOTAL 624,161 522,580 101,581 19.4% 14.6% 3,735,872 2,918,783 817,089 28.0% 14.7% Supplementals (7) In 9,343 7,982 1,361 17.1% -
Air Service & Economic Development
AIR SERVICE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CALED Conference March 23, 2017 – San Diego, CA © 2017 Mead & Hunt, Inc. TOPICS 2 . Airline industry update . Air service development overview . Purpose . Approach . Community partnerships/economic impact . Airline assistance . Summary AIRLINE INDUSTRY UPDATE INDUSTRY CONSOLIDATION 4 Top 5 Control approximately 87% of U.S. Domestic Market through M&As Today American Delta Southwest United Alaska US Virgin American TWA Delta Northwest AirTran ATA Southwest Continental United Alaska Airways America US Trump Morris Pan Am Jet American Reno Air America Ozark Delta Pan Am Northwest ValuJet ATA Southwest Continental United Airways Shuttle West Air Pacific America People Allegheny Piedmont Western National Republic Muse Air Express Horizon Air Cal PSA Frontier Florida Airlines (1982) Eastern Airlines (1991) Vanguard (2002) Skybus (2008) Other Notable Braniff Airways (1982) Midway Airlines (1991) Independence Air (2005) Aloha (2008) Defunct Airlines Air Florida (1984) Western Pacific (1998) Hooters Air (2006) DRIVES CAPACITY CONSOLIDATION 5 81% of the market is Only 19% of the market is controlled by 4 airlines controlled by all other carriers Spirit United 15% 16% JetBlue Southwest 23% 21% Frontier 10% Other 19% Hawaiian 7% Delta 21% Allegiant Alaska 8% American 30% All 23% Others 7% Source: Diio Mi Scheduled U.S. Domestic Seats for YE June 2017 UNPRECEDENTED CAPACITY DISCIPLINE 6 $60B in Losses $70B in Profits 90% 950,000 85% Seats (000s) 925,000 80% Load Factor 900,000 75% 875,000 70% 850,000 65% 60% 825,000 800,000 Load Factor Load 55% Seats (000s) Seats 50% 775,000 45% 750,000 . Other than the brief period after 9-11, the US industry had shown little interest in moderating capacity growth . -
PFC Quarterly Report - Receipts Collected for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2019 Collection Authority: Application # 06-02-C-00-FAI 33,217,000.00
PFC Quarterly Report - Receipts Collected For the Quarter Ending December 31, 2019 Collection Authority: Application # 06-02-C-00-FAI 33,217,000.00 Total Collection Authority 33,217,000.00 PFC Receipts Received Air Carriers Current Quarter Previous Quarters Cumulative Aer Lingus $ 4.39 $ 30.73 $ 35.12 Aeroflot Russian Airlines 30.73 276.35 307.08 Aerolane Lineas Nacionales 4.39 4.39 Aerovias de Mexico 13.17 13.17 AeroMexico 21.95 259.01 280.96 Air Canada 223.89 41,213.97 41,437.86 Air France 57.07 4,567.77 4,624.84 Air New Zealand 17.45 1,035.27 1,052.72 Air North Ch & Trng / Air North Partnership 185,458.15 185,458.15 Air Pacific Ltd, dba Fiji Airways 338.03 338.03 Alaska Airlines, Inc 277,504.20 14,146,648.82 14,424,153.02 Alitalia Airlines 30.73 30.73 All Nippon Airways Co. 266.91 2,431.29 2,698.20 Allegiant Air 197.55 197.55 Aloha Airlines 4.39 4.39 America West Airlines 1,771.14 1,771.14 American Airlines 7,154.18 371,116.66 378,270.84 American Trans Air 100.75 100.75 Asiana Airlines 61.46 6,195.92 6,257.38 Austrian Airlines 153.57 153.57 Avianca 39.51 202.15 241.66 Aviation Industry Consultants 17.45 17.45 Big Sky Airlines 201.72 201.72 British Airways 273.71 10,015.19 10,288.90 Brussels Airlines NV 8.78 8.78 Cape Air 21.95 21.95 Cathay Pacific Airways 121.59 772.60 894.19 Champion Air 237.06 237.06 China Airlines 8,360.06 8,360.06 Compania Panamena De Aviacion 30.73 197.55 228.28 Condor Flugdienst, GMBH 56,244.62 56,244.62 Continental Airlines 46,421.83 46,421.83 Corvus Airlines 417.05 7,176.12 7,593.17 Czech Airlines 26.34 26.34 Delta Airlines, Inc. -
Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Report
($ o sD '=JKFt-. ,-l- t-. % g ÊL Ji.='F P. #ÈË E Ë.á E \ì l-l+ -H I I o\3FEËE u)v)-t )_. F} c¡-¡Þ I cov - ct+p 'Ç Gallatin Airport Authority Management's l)iscusslon and Analysis Gøllatin Fíeld Aírport Fiscal Year 2006 (BZl'{) lntroduction Page I Activity Highlights Gal latin Airport Authority-B oard, Staff, M ission Page2 FY 2006 in Review-Airport Director..... Page 3 Airline Service Page 4 Airline Statistics Pages 5-6 Top l0 Airline Markets to and from Gallatin Field PageT Airline Terminal Concessionaire-Revenues and Passengers Page 8 Airport Revenues-Airline Terminal Area. Page 9 a Air Traffic Page l0 {.¡ Air Cargo & Express Page I I E-l (¡) Commercial General Aviation. Page 12 +) Non-commercial General Aviation. Page 13 -Fl o Airport Revenues-General Aviation Page 14 U Financial Highlights t¡¡ Operating lncome. Page 15 o Operating Expenses. Page 15 (Ð Non-operating Revenue and Expenses......... Page 16 Ê- Capital Contributions......... Page 16 F.cË Changes in Net Assets. Page 16 Statement of Net Assets. Page l7 Cash Management. Page 17 Highlights of the FY 2006 Budget... ... ... Page l8 Capital Improvements........ Page l8 Debt Management and Capital Financing.. Page 19 Contacting the Gallatin Airport Authority's Financial Management. .. Page 19 The management of the Gallatin Airport Authority has prepared the following discussion and analysis of the frnancial performance and activity of the Gallatin Airport Authority for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. The discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the entire 2006 fiscal year annual audit. -
Aviation History in Brownwood, Texas
Aviation History in Brownwood, Texas By Frank T. Hilton December 17, 1903 The first controlled, power and sustained heavier-than-air human flight by Orville and Wilbur Wright at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. October 4, 1913 Post office Department at Washington, D. C. established areoplane mail service between Brownwood and Comanche, Texas. Lester Miller flew one trip each day, October 10, 11, 12, 1913, during the Free Fall Fair. October 7, 1914 Miss Katherine Stinson, the youngest aviator in the world made daily flights at Brownwood Free Fair. She took passengers up for $25.00 per person. March 3, 1920 Lieutenants R. W. Lutz and F. E. Monor of Oshkosh, Wisconsin, flew a new Curtis plane over Brownwood, using the landing field west of the end of Austin Avenue as their base. “Airplanes flew over Brownwood and there was a local airport near Willis Creek near 12th and 13th streets,” John A. Thomason said. He described it as a north-south runway that looked like two straight dirt paths that accommodated the wheels for take-offs and landings.” November 10, 1929 The Brown County Fair Association decided to permit airplanes coming to Brownwood to use the fifty acres inside the mile race track. This has been used successfully in the past by airplanes. 1935 Airport in Brownwood was launched as a 200 acre tract leased by the city from the county. Dr. Edgar Fuller, Dallas scientist and inventor, constructed the beacon field for the airport. WPA funds applying six-inch calicle base on runways, clearing and leveling. September 11, 1940 The Army Air Corps officially approve the 200 acre Brownwood municipal airport as headquarters for the air squadron of the Thirty-Sixth Division. -
As of July 30, 2020 FT Aircraft Bulk Fuel Exempt
As of July 30, 2020 FT Aircraft Bulk Fuel Exempt Name DBA Name Address A-1 AVIATION INC WAVERLY, WA EASTERN WASHINGTON SPRAYING SERVICES ELTOPIA, WA LEADING EDGE AVIATION LLC CLARKSTON, WA GEM AIR INC WARDEN, WA ALASKA AIRLINES SEATTLE, WA ALLEGIANT AIR, LLC LAS VEGAS, NV FERGUSON FLYING SERVICE QUINCY, WA FLIGHT LEVEL ZERO, LLC OTHELLO, WA HILLE SPRAY SERVICES INC KAHLOTUS, WA JIM'S AIR SERVICE COLFAX, WA KENMORE AIR HARBOR KENMORE, WA NW AVIATION LLC ENTIAT, WA PRECISION HELICOPTERS INC NEWBERG, OR RANCH AERO INC PALOUSE, WA SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO DALLAS, TX STEPHEN B. PASSMORE DBA PASSMORE AVIATION LACROSSE, WA STEVE AND KEVIN MADER GP PULLMAN, WA SUPER KAT INC NEZPERCE, ID TRI-CITY HELICOPTER SERVICE INC RICHLAND, WA UNITED AIRLINES, INC CHICAGO, IL US AIRWAYS INC PHOENIX, AZ WEST ISLE AIR INC DBA CHELAN SEAPLANES CHELAN, WA CONDEL LLC A-1 AVIATION WAVERLY, WA CROPLAND AIR SERVICES INC DAYTON, WA FAUNCE AG AVIATION TEKOA, WA FENDER AIR SERVICE GARFIELD, WA LUND FLYING SERVICE, INC RITZVILLE, WA PAUL STEARNS ROCKFORD, WA PFISTER'S FARM AVIATION INC PASCO, WA ROYAL FLYING SERVICE INC ROYAL CITY, WA SKYWEST AIRLINES INC SAINT GEORGE, UT STUCKEL PLACE LLC WARDEN, WA THE CROP DUSTER INC EPHRATA, WA WASHINGTON LIQUID FERTILIZER CO WAPATO, WA WEAVER FLYING SERVICE INC QUINCY, WA 1 As of July 30, 2020 FT Aircraft Bulk Fuel Exempt Name DBA Name Address A-1 AG AVIATION FAIRFIELD, WA AIR-TRAC INC PASCO, WA BUZZ RUCHERT FLYING SERVICE POMEROY, WA GOSSARD AVIATION INC ST JOHN, WA WILBUR-ELLIS CO NAPAVINE, WA B/R CROP CARE CONNELL, WA ABX AIR INC -
Year 2035 Long-Range Transportation Plan Rockford Area
Year 2035 Long-Range Transportation Plan Rockford Area Transportation Study YEAR 2035 LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN for the ROCKFORD AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY METROPOLITAN PLANNING AREA JULY 28, 2005 This Plan was prepared as a cooperative effort between Rockford Area Transportation Study T.Y. Lin International and The al-Chalabi Group, Ltd. POLICY COMMITTEE Mayor Lawrence J. Morrissey – City of Rockford Mayor Darryl F. Lindberg – City of Loves Park Board Chairman Scott H. Christiansen – Winnebago County President Linda M. Vaughn – Village of Machesney Park Mayor Frederic C. Brereton – City of Belvidere Board Chairman Susan L. Anderson – Boone County Deputy Director Gregory L. Mounts – Illinois Department of Transportation, Region 2 Federal law requires this Plan to be updated every five years. This Plan can be amended or updated at any time. Comments and proposed refinements or changes should be directed as follows. Rockford Area Transportation Study Rockford City Hall 425 East State Street, Rockford, Illinois 61104 Phone: 815-987-5570 FAX: 815-967-7058 Document website: http://cityofrockford.net/government/works/index.cfm?section=planning&id=977 Rockford Area Transportation Study Year 2035 – Long-Range Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS......................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background