DOCSLIB.ORG

City Manager of Hamilton [Ffl

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City Manager of Hamilton [Ffl 0!?/G//V/41 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO. 2 .=» 1;? __1_rE~;Q_;) (G STATE EX REL BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP, BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO and TOM BARNES TRUSTEE and GARY R. COUCH TRUSTEE and JUDY VALERIO TRUSTEE Relators, v. CITY OF HAMILTON, OHIO and JOSHUA SMITH A ; CITY MANAGER OF HAMILTON [Ffl and AFC“? EU £Tf.J1-I CLERK or coum THOMAS VANDERHORST SUPREME coumoromo FINANCE DIRECTOR OF HAMILTON Respondents, Original Action in Mandamus MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THE COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS COUNSEL FOR RELA TORS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS Gary L. Sheets (0019384) Heather Sanderson Lewis (0069212) Attorney At Law Director of Law 1731 Cleveland Avenue City of Hamilton, Ohio Hamilton, Ohio 45013 345 High Street lsheets fuse.net Hamilton, Ohio 4501 1 Office: 513-520-5517 Office: 513-785-7180 lewis mfitton.com Catherine A. Cunningham (0015730) Richard C. Brahm (0009481) Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter 65 East State Street, Suite 1800 Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614)462-5486 Fax: (614)228-1472 [email protected] rbrahmagkeglerbrown.com IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE EX REL BOARD OF TRUSTEES ) OF ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP, BUTLER COUNTY, et al. Relators, Case No. avvv MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THE COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS CITY OF HAMILTON, OHIO et al. wvwwwvvw S.Ct.Prac.R. l2.02(b)(l) Respondents MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THE COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL QUESTION PRESENTED ....................................................................... ..1 FACTS UNDERLYING THE COMPLAINT ........................................................ ..1 LEGAL ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF RELATOR'S COMPLAINT Preposition of Law #1 Mandamus is the appropriate remedy for a township to compel a municipal corporation to make R.C. 709.19 lost tax revenue compensation payments to the township where that municipal corporation has secured a R.C. 503.07 boundary adjustment that removes territory from the township and relocates it into a paper township lying within the boundaries of the petitioning municipal corporation but refuses to the township pay the compensation provided by RC. 709.19. .. Preposition of Law #2 When a municipal corporation’s R.C. 503.07 boundary adjustment petition is granted by county commissioners, R.C. 709.19(B) imposes a clear legal duty upon that municipal corporation to make and grants the township whose boundary has been adjusted and relocated a clear legal right to receive lost tax revenue compensation payments in an amount to be determined by either an agreement between the township and the municipal corporation or, absent such an agreement, the amount provided in R.C. 709. 1 9(C) and (D). ................... ..10 Preposition of Law #3 Where a municipal corporation is required by R.C. 709.l9(B) to make lost tax revenue compensation payments to a township in an amount defined by R.C. 709.19(C) and (D), because R.C. 709.19(B) does not provide who is to compute the payment to be made, but does impose the duty to make such payment upon the municipal corporation, the municipal corporation has an attendant clear legal duty once each year to accurately and completely calculate, or cause to be calculated, the correct compensation due the township according to R.C. 709.19 (C) and (D). .................................. .. _i. Preposition of Law #4 Where a municipal corporation is required by R.C. 709.l9(B) to make lost tax revenue compensation payments to a township in an amount defined by R.C. 709. l9(C) and (D), because R.C. 709.l9(B) does not provide how frequently the required payments are to be made, the municipal corporation is to be afforded a reasonable time to compute and then actually make the required payments. A reasonable time for computing and actually making the required payment due the township is 30 days afier the municipal corporation receives from the county treasurer the tax distributions it has received as a result of its boundary adjustment petition's granting. Where there are multiple distributions to the municipal corporation in a single year, there would likewise be multiple distributions by the municipal corporation to the township 30 days thereafter. Preposition of Law #5 The uncodified language in Section 3 of 2001 Am Sub S.B. No. 5 does not relieve a municipal corporation of its duty to pay a township R.C. 709.l9(B) lost tax revenue compensation when the municipal corporation secures a R.C. 503.07 boundary adjustment because the property being removed from the township by that adjustment was armexed into the municipal corporation before Am 2001 Sub S.B. No. 5 took effect. ........... .. CONCLUSION . PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE ...................................................................................... ..24 CASES AND AUTHORITIES Cases: Ac/tison v. Anchor Packing 120 C0,, Ohio St.3d 228, 2008-Ohio-5243, 897 N.E.2d 11 18 1115 ................................ ..5 Jewel! v. Valley Ca, 34 Ohio St, - N.E.- Ry. 601, 608, (1878). ........................ ..15-16 Kallas v. Ohio Water Serv. Ca., 132 Ohio App.3d 421 725 N.E.2d 324 , (1999) ......................................... ..21 Kilbreath V. Rudy. 16 Ohio St,2d 242 70. N.E.2d 658 (1968), paragraph one ofthe syllabus. .................................. ..5 Maynard V. Eaton Corp., 119 Ohio St.3d 443, 2008-Ohio-4542, 895 N.E.2d 145, 11 7.. ...................... ..21 Roberts v. Treasurer, 147 Ohio App.3d 403, 41 1, 770 N.E.2d 1085 (2001) ............................................................ ..21 State V. Taniguchi, 74 Ohio St.3d 154, 156, 656 N.E.2d 1286 (1995) ...................................................................... ..23 Stale v. Thomas, 148 Ohio St.3d 248, 2016-Ohio-5567, -N.E. 3d-, 11 11, ................................................................. ..22 State v. Waddell 71 Ohio (1995), St.3d 630, 631, 646 N.E.2d 821 (1995).. ............................. ..25 Slate ex relA1ty. Gen. v. Morris, 63 Ohio St. 59 NE. 496, 226, 230 (1900) ..................................................... .. 15-16 State ex rel. Baker v. Indus. 143 Comm., Ohio St.3d 56, 2015-Ohio-1191, 34 N.E.3d 104. ...................................... ..8 State ex rel. Foster v. Evati, 144 Ohio St. 65, 56 NE2d 265 (1944), paragraph eight oflhe syllabus .................... ..25 State, ex rel. Harris, v. Rhodes, 54 Ohio St,2d 41, 374 N.E.2d 641 (1978) .............................................................. ..8 State ex rel. McClaran V. City ofOn/aria, 119 Ohio St.3d 105, 2008-Ohio-3867, 892 N.E.2d 440 11 15. ............... ..10 State ex rel. Fressley V. Indus. Comm., 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631 paragraph six ofthe (1967), syllabus .1 1 State ex rel. Slaughter V. Indus. Comm., 132 Ohio St. 537, 9 N.E.2d 505, paragraph three ofthe syllabus. ............. ..7 State ex rel. Ullmann v. 103 Hm/es, Ohio St.3d 405, 2004-Ohio-5469, 816 NE2d 245 118. .................................. ..10 Turner v. Dept. ofRehab. & Corr., 144 Ohio St.3d 377, 2015—Ohio- 2833, 43 N.E.3d 435 (2015) ........................... .,8 Thornton V. Salalr, I 12 Ohio St.3d 254, 2006-Ohio-6407, 858 N.E.2d 1187 ........................................................... ..23. Toledo City School Dist. Bd. ofEdn. v. State Bd. ofEdn,, 146 Ohio St..3d 356, 2016-Ohio-2806, 56 N.E.3d 950 22 Wilson v. AC&S, Inc., 169 Ohio App.3d 720, 2006-Ohio-6704, 864 N.E.2d 682 11 77 .......................................... ..21 Ohio Attorney General Opinions: -iii- 2005 Ohio Atty. Gen. Op. No. 2005-024 ............................................... ..12 Authorities: Ohio Constitution: Ohio Constitution Section 28, Article II ............................................. ..7, 22 Ohio Statutes R.C. 503.07 ........................................................................................ .. 1-23 R.C. 503.09 .....13 R.C. 709.023 20-21 R.C. 709.024 20-21 R.C. 709.19 - .......................................................................... .. ~ 0, 15-26 Ohio Uncodified Law Am Sub 2001 S.B. No. 5 Section 3 ....................... .. _;V_ LEGAL QUESTION PRESENTED The legal question presented in this original action in mandamus is whether R.C. 709.19(B) imposes a clear legal duty upon the Respondent City of Hamilton (hereafter “Hamilton”) and grants Relator St. Clair Township a clear legal right to be paid “lost tax revenue compensation” in an amount determined by R.C. 709.1 9((‘) and (D) upon the Board of Butler County Commissioners’ adoption of a R.C. 503.07 boundary adjustment resolution which adjusted the boundary between Hamilton and St. Clair Township by removing territory from St. Clair Township and relocating that territory into a “paper township” named “Hamilton Township.” FACTS UNDERLYING THE COMPLAINT The facts giving rise to this action are simple, undisputed, and well-documented. On September 14, 2016, Hamilton City Council received a Staff Report (Exhibit A to the Complaint) from Respondent Hamilton Finance Director Tom Vanderhorst setting forth the reasons why City Council should immediately adopt an Ordinance authorizing Respondent City Manager Joshua Smith to file an R.C. 503.07 boundary adjustment petition with the Board of Butler County Commissioners (hereafter “Commissioners”). The Staff Report’s “Background Infomtation” section explained why a boundary adjustment was immediately necessary. It stated: “Over time, the City has annexed property from four surrounding townships. No documentation has been located indicating that the City has ever filed a subsequent petition with the county commissioners to remove annexed territory from a township after annexations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 44 Issue 2 60 Years after the Enactment of the Indian Country Statute - What Was, What Is, and What Should Be Winter 2008 The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias William Wood Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William Wood, The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias, 44 Tulsa L. Rev. 317 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol44/iss2/1 This Native American Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wood: The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villa THE TRAJECTORY OF INDIAN COUNTRY IN CALIFORNIA: RANCHERIAS, VILLAGES, PUEBLOS, MISSIONS, RANCHOS, RESERVATIONS, COLONIES, AND RANCHERIAS William Wood* 1. INTRODUCTION This article examines the path, or trajectory,1 of Indian country in California. More precisely, it explores the origin and historical development over the last three centuries of a legal principle and practice under which a particular, protected status has been extended to land areas belonging to and occupied by indigenous peoples in what is now California. The examination shows that ever since the Spanish first established a continuing presence in California in 1769, the governing colonial regime has accorded Indian lands such status.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro-Social Permutations of Water Commodification in Blantyre City, Malawi
    Hydro-Social Permutations of Water Commodification in Blantyre City, Malawi A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2014 Isaac M.K. Tchuwa School of Environment Education and Development Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................. 6 List of Tables ................................................................................................................... 7 List of Graphs ................................................................................................................. 7 List of Photos .................................................................................................................. 8 List of Maps .................................................................................................................... 9 Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 10 Declaration .................................................................................................................... 11 Copyright Statement .................................................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Concepts of Enclave and Exclave and Their Use
    www.ssoar.info The concepts of enclave and exclave and their use in the political and geographical characteristic of the Kaliningrad region Rozhkov-Yuryevsky, Yuri Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Rozhkov-Yuryevsky, Y. (2013). The concepts of enclave and exclave and their use in the political and geographical characteristic of the Kaliningrad region. Baltic Region, 2, 113-123. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2013-2-11 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-351079 RESEARCH REPORTS This article focuses on the genesis of THE CONCEPTS and correlation between the related con- OF ENCLAVE cepts of enclave and exclave and the scope of their use in different sciences, fields of AND EXCLAVE knowledge, and everyday speech. The au- thor examines the circumstances of their AND THEIR USE emergence in the reference and professional IN THE POLITICAL literature in the Russian language. Special attention is paid to the typology of the AND GEOGRAPHICAL world’s enclave territories as objects of po- CHARACTERISTIC litical geography; at the same time, their new categories and divisions (international OF THE KALININGRAD enclave, overseas exclaves, internal en- claves of different levels) are extended and REGION introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Tenure Issues in Southern Sudan: Key Findings and Recommendations for Southern Sudan Land Policy
    LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY DECEMBER 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech ARD. LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY THE RESULTS OF A RESEARCH COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE SUDAN PROPERTY RIGHTS PROGRAM AND THE NILE INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DECEMBER 2010 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acknowledgements Page i Scoping Paper Section A Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla Jurisdiction of GOSS, State, County, and Customary Authorities over Land Section B Administration, Planning, and Allocation: Juba County, Central Equatoria State Lomoro Robert Bullen Land Tenure and Property Rights in Southern Sudan: A Case Study of Section C Informal Settlements in Juba Gabriella McMichael Customary Authority and Traditional Authority in Southern Sudan: A Case Study Section D of Juba County Wani Mathias Jumi Conflict Over Resources Among Rural Communities in Southern Sudan Section E Andrew Athiba Synthesis Paper Section F Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The USAID Sudan Property Rights Program has supported the Southern Sudan Land Commission in its efforts to undertake consultation and research on land tenure and property rights issues; the findings of these initiatives were used to draft a land policy that is meant to be both legitimate and relevant to the needs of Southern Sudanese citizens and legal rights-holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Extracting Semantic Relations from Wikipedia Using Spark
    BACHELORTHESIS Extracting Semantic Relations from Wikipedia using Spark vorgelegt von Hans Ole Hatzel MIN-Fakult¨at Fachbereich Informatik Wissenschaftliches Rechnen Studiengang: Informatik Matrikelnummer: 6416555 Betreuer: Dr. Julian Kunkel Erstgutachter: Dr. Julian Kunkel Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Thomas Ludwig CONTENTS CONTENTS Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Motivation . .3 1.2 Goals of this Thesis . .3 1.3 Outline . .4 2 Background 5 2.1 Wikipedia . .5 2.2 Spark . .5 2.2.1 PySpark . .7 2.3 Linguistics . .7 2.3.1 Proper Nouns & Common Nouns . .8 2.3.2 Compound Words . .8 2.4 CRA . .8 2.5 Part-of-Speech Tagging . .8 2.6 Data Mining . .8 2.6.1 K-Means Clustering . .8 2.7 TF-IDF . .9 3 Related Work 10 3.1 Explicit Semantic Analysis . 10 3.2 Word2Vec . 10 4 Design 12 4.1 Preparing Raw Data . 12 4.2 Pipeline for Finding Compound Words . 12 4.2.1 Identifying Nouns . 13 4.2.2 Counting Words . 14 4.2.3 Forming Pairs of Words . 15 4.2.4 Alternative for Forming Pairs . 16 4.2.5 Grouping . 16 4.2.6 Sorting . 16 4.3 Generating CRA Tasks . 17 4.3.1 Psychological considerations . 17 4.3.2 Extracting CRA Tasks . 17 4.3.3 Pruning of results . 19 4.3.4 An Alternative Approach . 19 4.4 Finding solutions for CRA Tasks . 20 4.4.1 Generated Tasks . 20 4.4.2 Real World Tasks . 20 4.5 Finding Semantic Groups in List of Words . 21 4.5.1 Filtering to Improve Word Vectors .
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict & Communication Online 15,2
    conflict & communication online, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2016 www.cco.regener-online.de ISSN 1618-0747 Editorial Friedensjournalismus Peace Journalism Saumava Mitra Sichtbarmachen durch photojournalistische Hervorhebung als Selbstreflexivität des Photojournalismus: Zwei Fallstudien über akzidentiellen Friedensjournalismus Display-through-foregrounding by photojournalists as self-reflexivity in photojournalism: Two case studies of accidental peace photojournalism Marta Natalia Lukacovic Friedensjournalismus und radikale Medienethik Peace journalism and radical media ethics Essays Wilhelm Kempf Gefahren des Friedensjournalismus Dangers of peace journalism Freie Beiträge Non-thematic contributions Patrick Osei-Kufuor, Stephen B Kendie & Kwaku Adutwum Boakye Konflikt, Frieden und Entwicklung: Eine räumlich-thematische Analyse gewaltförmiger Konflikte im Norden Ghanas zwischen 2007 und 2013 Conflict, peace and development: A spatio-thematic analysis of violent conflicts in Northern Ghana between 2007 and 2013 Dokumentation Documentation „Kindness builds the world" Willkommenflyer der jüdisch-österreichischen Freiwilligengruppe Shalom Alaikum / Jewish Aid for Refugees Vienna Welcome flyer of the Jewish-Austrian volunteer group Shalom Alaikum / Jewish Aid for Refugees Vienna "Freundschaft gegen Hass" Link zu einem Aufsatz von Alexia Weiss in der Wiener Zeitung vom 23.6.2016 "MuslimInnen und Islam in Österreich" Link zu einem Katalog von Fragen und Antworten der österreichischen Menschenrechtsorganisation SOS Mitmensch „Kasseler Schulderklärung“ Dokumentation
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Township of Springwater Economic Development Strategy June 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Strategic planning is one of the most important tools that a community or economic development organization can use for effective development. It is a means for establishing strategic initiatives and maintaining effective programming based on economic opportunities, constraints and the needs of a community. In the case of the Township of Springwater, its advantageous location within the County of Simcoe, one of the fastest growing regions in the Province, and puts Springwater on the doorstep of one of the busiest four season recreation areas with access to Highways 400, 26 and 93, providing a strong competitive advantage for business and investment attraction to the community. In light of these considerations, the Mayor and Council recognized the need for the community’s first Economic Development Strategy that is premised on building on the Township’s existing strengths and translating this into new opportunities for economic growth. An integral aspect in developing an economic development strategy for the Township of Springwater is to understand its current competitive advantages and disadvantages, its business base, its investment readiness, and the quality of place and experience that it offers both residents and visitors. These factors coupled with the Township’s potential to attract new investment, the presence of entrepreneurs and the capacity for growth in its existing business and industries will help to ensure the Township’s future economic success. Key Objectives Millier Dickinson Blais was contracted by the Township of Springwater to prepare a strategy that will assist and inform the economic development programming efforts of the Township.
    [Show full text]
  • «@563 Case No
    04>/5 /4411 IN THE SUPREME CGOURT OF OHIO ~«@563 CASE NO. STATE EX REL BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP, BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO and TOM BARNES TRUSTEE and GARY R. COUCH TRUSTEE and JUDY VALERIO TRUSTEE Relators, v. CITY OF HAMILTON, OHIO and JOSHUA SMITH L _;, CITY MANAGER OF HAMILTO 3‘? 1 APT? ~. = and CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO THOMAS VANDERHORST FINANCE DIRECTOR OF HAMILTON Respondents, Original Action in Mandamus RELATORS’ MOTION AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM FOR A PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDAMUS COUNSEL FOR RELA TORS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS Gary L. Sheets (0019384) Heather Sanderson Lewis (0069212) Attorney At Law Director of Law 1731 Cleveland Avenue City of Hamilton, Ohio Hamilton, Ohio 45013 345 High Street glsheetsgii/1'use.net Hamilton, Ohio 45011 Office: 513-520-5517 Office: 513-785-7180 lewis@mfitt0n.eom Catherine A. Cunningham (0015730) Richard C. Brahm (0009481) Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter 65 East State Street, Suite 1800 Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 462-5486 Fax: (614) 228-1472 ccuninghamflkeglerbrownxom [email protected] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE EX REL BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP, BUTLER COUNTY et al. Relators, V. Case No. CITY OF HAMILTON, OHIO et al \a~a~a\/sax/sasasysa Respondents, RELATORS' MOTION AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM FOR A PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDAMUS Relators St. Clair Township and its Trustees move this Court to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus in this case directed to the Respondents City of Hamilton, Ohio, its City Manager Joshua Smith, and its Finance Director Tom Vanderhorst. As grounds for the granting of such a peremptory writ, Relators say the relevant facts in this case are uncontroverted and it appears beyond doubt that St.
    [Show full text]
  • South Central Accord
    South Central Accord August 1997 The South Central Accord adopted by: Hamilton Township Board of Trustees, June 11, 1997 Columbus City Council, July 21, 1997 Board of Franklin County Commissioners, August 6, 1997 South Central Accord Planning Committee: Karen Schutte, Planning Committee Chair, Hamilton Township Clerk Jerry Bennett, Olen Corporation Mike Casey, Council of Southside Organizations Jeff Clark, Rickenbacker Port Authority Terry Frazier, Pickaway County Commissioners George Hammond, Village of Lockbourne George Kinney, Franklin County Development Department Robert Leonhard, Save Our Southside Civic Association Linda White, Greater Far South Business Association Prepared by: Kevin J. Wheeler, Columbus Planning Division Tracy V. Healy, Columbus Planning Division Graphics: Grace A. Ashby, Columbus Planning Division City of Columbus staff contributing to this effort include Planning Administrator Steve McClary, Long Range Planning Manager Beth Clark, and Senior Planners Tracy Healy and Kevin Wheeler. Hamil- ton Township staffing was provided by the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission, including the work of Linda Donnelly, Allan Neimayer, and Tim Richardson. Karen Schutte served as chair for the Planning Committee and kept the discussion focused and productive. Don Brosius provided creative ideas and assis- tance throughout the project. South Central Accord November 1997 Dear Citizen: The South Central Accord is the result of a cooperative effort among the City of Columbus, Hamilton Township, and Franklin County. We recognized that as Rickenbacker and its surrounding area continue to develop, a plan needed to be in place to guide growth responsibly. This particular plan required a joint venture in order to be sensitive to the needs of everyone involved. The South Central Accord establishes long-range guidelines to manage future growth and develop- ment in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-Ohio-717.] Mandamus—Writ Sought to Compel City to Pay Township for Lost Tax Revenue Associated with Township Territory Annexed to City—R.C
    [Cite as State ex rel. St. Clair Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Hamilton, 156 Ohio St.3d 272, 2019-Ohio- 717.] THE STATE EX REL. ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES ET AL. v. THE CITY OF HAMILTON ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. St. Clair Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Hamilton, 156 Ohio St.3d 272, 2019-Ohio-717.] Mandamus—Writ sought to compel city to pay township for lost tax revenue associated with township territory annexed to city—R.C. 709.19— Township has failed to establish amount city owes—Writ denied. (No. 2017-0563—Submitted January 8, 2019—Decided March 5, 2019.) IN MANDAMUS. _________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} In this original action, relators, the St. Clair Township Board of Trustees and Trustees Tom Barnes, John R. Snyder, and Judy Valerio (collectively, “St. Clair”), have filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus compelling respondents, the city of Hamilton (“the city”), City Manager Joshua Smith, and City Finance Director David C. Jones (collectively, “Hamilton”), to calculate (or cause to be calculated) and pay lost tax revenue associated with territory that was annexed to the city before March 27, 2002, but not excluded from the township until 2016.1 For the reasons that follow, we deny the writ. 1. Jones’s predecessor, Thomas Vanderhorst, was named in his official capacity as a party when this case was originally filed. Because Jones succeeded to Vanderhorst’s position while this case was pending, Jones “is automatically substituted as a party,” S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.06(B), for Vanderhorst. For similar reasons, we deny as moot St.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of Ohio Case No. 2017
    Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed July 25, 2018 - Case No. 2017-0563 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO. 2017-0563 ______________________________________________________ STATE EX REL BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP, BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO and TOM BARNES TRUSTEE and JOHN R. SNYDER TRUSTEE and JUDY VALERIO TRUSTEE Relators, v. CITY OF HAMILTON, OHIO and JOSHUA SMITH CITY MANAGER OF HAMILTON and THOMAS VANDERHORST FINANCE DIRECTOR OF HAMILTON Respondents, Original Action in Mandamus MERIT BRIEF OF RELATORS COUNSEL FOR RELATORS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS Gary L. Sheets (0019384) Catherine A. Cunningham (0015730) Attorney At Law Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter 1731 Cleveland Avenue 65 East State Street, Suite 1800 Hamilton, Ohio 45013 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Office: 513-520-5517 Office: (614) 462-5486 [email protected] Fax: (614) 228-1472 [email protected] Counsel of Record Heather Sanderson Lewis (0069212) Director of Law City of Hamilton, Ohio 345 High Street Hamilton, Ohio 45011 Office: 513-785-7180 [email protected] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE EX REL BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP, BUTLER COUNTY et al. ) Relator, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2017-0563 ) CITY OF HAMILTON, OHIO et al. ) ) ) Respondents, ) ) MERIT BRIEF OF RELATORS COUNSEL FOR RELATORS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS Gary L. Sheets (0019384) Catherine A. Cunningham (0015730) Attorney At Law Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter 1731 Cleveland Avenue 65 East State Street, Suite 1800 Hamilton, Ohio 45013 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Office: 513-520-5517 Office: (614) 462-5486 [email protected] Fax: (614) 228-1472 [email protected] Heather Sanderson Lewis (0069212) Director of Law City of Hamilton, Ohio 345 High Street Hamilton, Ohio 45011 Office: 513-785-7180 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF THE AUTHORITIES ........
    [Show full text]
  • Village Council Meeting As a Committee of the Whole April 9, 2019 6:30 PM
    Village Council Meeting As A Committee of the Whole April 9, 2019 6:30 PM ROLL CALL: Richard Bingham, Rebecca Conklin Kleiboemer, Mindy Curry, Bob Keogh, and Bill May. Also present were the following: Mayor Don Atkinson, Administrator Jordan Daugherty, Public Services Director Steve Pilcher, Police Chief Mark McDonough, Fire Chief Joshua Hartbarger, Clerk Susan Miller, and Karen Gerhardinger. Motion by Bob Keogh, seconded by Mindy Curry to approve the minutes of the March 12, 2019 meeting. 5 ayes President of Council, Bill May stated that Councilwoman, Louann Artiaga, had a family emergency. President of Council, Bill May asked for Citizen Comments pertaining to Agenda items. There were none. Motion by Rebecca Conklin Kleiboemer, seconded by Bill May to amend the Agenda to include considering conforming boundaries. 5 ayes Public Service The first order of business was to review the Water Line Recoupment Ordinance. The Village extended the water main and as people tap into it, they pay per square foot of frontage, in this case $26.79/foot The cost per foot will not change for this location People can tap into it or do nothing, they only pay when they do tap into it Motion by Bob Keogh, seconded by Rebecca Conklin Kleiboemer to recommend to Council to approve the Water Line Recoupment Ordinance. 5 ayes The next order of business was to discuss a skid steer purchase. The department tested several pieces of equipment The recommendation is to purchase a Caterpillar Model 236 D for $47,680.14 Motion by Rebecca Conklin Kleiboemer, seconded by Richard Bingham to recommend to Council to enter into a contract with Ohio Cat for the purchase of a skid steer.
    [Show full text]