DOCSLIB.ORG

[Lhe Lnyenzi Were About to Kill Hassan N GEZE but Thank (Jod, He Escaped Death.] ~6Ma: ]'He Mukombozi Hycenthe Caught Red-Hand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
[Lhe Lnyenzi Were About to Kill Hassan N GEZE but Thank (Jod, He Escaped Death.] ~6Ma: ]'He Mukombozi Hycenthe Caught Red-Hand [lhelnyenzi were about to kill Hassan N GEZEbut thank (Jod, he escapeddeath.] ~6ma:]’he Mukombozi Hycenthe caught red-handëd selling a bulldozzer] AnRPF soldier (left): We aregoing to killyou, come what may. You are not the first andwill not be thelast. Who told you to fight us by makingyourselfa Hutu spokesman? A soldierin the middle, wearing glasses: Why do you continue to pitthe ethnic groups againsteach other? Repeat that you in the CDR are vigilant. We are going to killyou, cornewhat may. Call Ikinani to cometo your rescue. We shalldeal with those you refer toas Hutu extremists. Ngeze(sitting in themiddle) Do whatyou like. Kill me, but know that ifthe people who arein the majority hear about my death, Rwanda will be razed to theground. [I’hosewho were to killHabyanmana m May arethe samepeople who shot MUGENZI ir~ ~henight of 19 - 94] [l’helnkotanyi want to organlze a coup d" Etal~ I Thewar may spread to Kigali in a fewdays. [Habyarimanahimself is callingtor contemp~ K0145036-K0145051 Translated from the French KO 151343 Çartoon _Burundi:The Tutsis are going too far, [Soldierspeaking: Wesoldiers will not accept to be led by ignorant Hutus. ~aelnyenzi were} about to killHfissan N(SEZE btït thank Ood, he escapêddeath. A popularadage says: a criminalcannot remain in hiding for long. On 8 January1994, theInyenzi revealed tothe Rwandans and to the world at largethat what they refer to as "peace"is for them unachievable. Forthose of you who are closely following the political events, my arrest can be comparedto thetype the RPF wants to subject all those who do not share its ideology to. Sincethe RPF launched attacks that cannot be forgottenfor years to comeand which resultedinthe death and torture of many people we would never forget, patriotic Rwandanscontinue to condenmthe attacks as muchas theycan. Even before the RPF launchedthis attack, some people fought these Inyenzi with all their might. Themost recent examples are the Kangura joumalists who fought so thatRwanda is not takenby surprise and be again placed under the yoke of slavery. Wehave told the people what attitude to adoptin theface of thecurrent problems and theybave understood. Wehave made life difficult for the Inyenzi and have made it clear thatwe shallone day ask them why they killed innocent people. There is a proverbthat says:"An lnyenzi proposes and God disposes." A few daysago, a planto topplethe governmentwas hatched.KAVARUGANDA had joinedthe Inyenzi to hatch this plan. The Rwandans resolved not to accept that a group ofInyenzi making up theRPF as well as othershiding within the PSD carry out a coupd’ Etatunder the pretext that they were experienced inthe massacre of innocentcitizens. Thepopulation has resolved to fightthe Inyenzi by all possible means. Those of us defendingthe Republic feel that the blood of those who have been brutally murdered by theRPF because they were Hutus is enough reason for us tofight. The blood of our brothersand sisters should be reason enough to uniteus and request that the RPF account forthe acts they committed during the war. We should organize events that would be recordedin theannals of Rwandan history and remind us ofthe innocent people killed between1990 and 1994. I hada brushwith death. As thepeople who had woken early prepared to go anddemonstrate inthe streets against theconfusion caused by theRPF (it was around 6:30 a.m. on 8 January1994), the Inyenzi.who can be reachedon 82314 telephoned my house and I answeredthe call. K0145036-K0145051 Translated from the French K0151544 Theywanted to speakto HassanNGEZE. I askedwho the caller was and was told that it wasthe RPF leadership. I asked why they wanted me and this is what they said to me: TheRFP leadership has eventually realized that a greaterpart of theRwandan population donot want the transitional institutions tobe put in place before the internal problerns withinthe MDR and PL areresolved. Wehave noticed that it is thissection ofthe populationdemonstrating in the streets. Consequently, webave decided not to participate in thisproblem-riddled government, which will be opposedby manypeople who would notaccept it. We havetherefore decided to informthe Rwandans of this.We would liketo havean interview with Hassan NGEZE, a reputablejournalist inRwanda and the sub-region.We wouldalso like to havean interviewwith Kantano HABIMANA who hasalso shown time and again that he isa manofrepute. I wasvery happy to hear this. Hearing the RPF say for the first time that confusion will hOtlead to anything, that even ifthey killed, itwould hOt be possible toexterrninate ail theHutus, that they did not want tobe part of the transition government until ail these problemsare solved! I immediately said: "Here is a scoopfor Kangura readers and RTLMlisteners. We havefor them some unusual news about the history of Rwanda, particularIythatthe enemy bas accepted to giveup obduracy and toe the line of democracy." It wasabout 6:45 a.m. I tookmy equipment and left for K himat home.I believedhe hadalso been informed and had antanogone sahead house.of I me. didI not find thereforestarted my car and headed for the RPF detachment at the CND. Since I was scared,I tooksome people with me includingHadji GIHUNGU alias Kitonsa and the intrepidMugesera feared by thelnyenzi ofBiryogo. When we arrivedat theCND gare, we askedthe guards on dutyifthere was a presscon/~rence going on andthev told us thatthey knew nothing about it and advised us toask the lnyenzi at theentran’ce. I thereforeapproached those lnyenzi to findout where the press conference was being heldand about 50 ofthem carrying high-calibre weapons got up at thesaine time and draggedme mercilesslyinto their hideout. When we arrivedat thebouse, they undressedmeand left me stark naked. I thenrealized that I wasgoing to die and said the following:"It is clear that the moment for my death which I havebeen expecting has finallycorne. Please allow me twominutes ofprayer, after which you may do whatyou learnt."Two minutes later, I needed to go tothe toilet and I wasshown where it was located.As theydid, they made fun of me,saying that people who are about to die usuallyneed the toilet. There was no running water in the toi/et and they hit me with the buttof a gun,asking me whywe hadput them in a buildingthat did not bave water.. As I hadnothing to lose,having realized that my lire was coming to an end, I wasnot afraid totell them anything I wanted. Regarding the lack ofwater, I explained tothem that it wastheir fault because they had destroyed the Ntaruka data. They then took me backto wherethey had initially detained meand several lnyenzi surround’ed me,pointing their gunsat my nape. They rnade me sit on a chairand called in a journalistwho started to questionme, asking me why the Tutsi in the country had been silenced. He asked several K0145036-K0145051Translated from the French K0151345 otherquestions. I told him I hadno answer to give to that and that ifthey wanted to kill me,they should go aheadand doit quickly. I even told them not to have any mercy on me/’orthey were not in a positionto do so.They asked why I feltthey could not have pityon me andI toldthem that they had been brutally murdering innocent peasants who çouldneither read nor write and who had done nothing to them.If theycould not pity thosepeople, what then would happen to someonelike me who has just spent four years fightingthem openly? I saidto theColonel who was leading the attack: "I aragoing to die, I amHassan NGEZE andI willremain equal to myseI£ However, the entire country will be filled with cries of pain,rivers of blood will flow and all the accomplices inthe country will be exterminated."I then told them that if they liked Rwanda, which tlaey were trying to rule byforce, it was high time they restored peace, for the blood they had shed and drunk was enough. I gavethem the example of a neighbouringcountry reminding them that NDADAYE had diedalone but that more that one hundred thousand Tutsis had gone with him and his deathhad proven how wicked the Tutsis were. Upon hearing that, they looked at each otherand a groupof 50 Inyenzileft and were replaced by anothergroup. They came a threateningmanner, saying that they were goin g to show me how NDADAYEdied. in Theythentook .... showingme they were going to cutmy .... whatwould grieve those who were to secmy body.I wonderedgenitals;why they sayingwere thatnot this in is a hurryto kill me and gave no explanation forit. While I wasbeing ridiculed, thePolitical committeeof theRPF was busy preparing a long document containing all the accusations theywere to bringagainst the Hutusof Rwanda,particularly against HABYARIMANi. TheRPF wanted me to signthe document, thereby accepting that everything reflected thereinhad happened. They wanted me toread it whilethey recorded it, so it couldbe airedall over the world. I would like you to reflect on the contents of thedocument and itsseriousness. To whatdo I owemy life? Whenthe gendarmes noticed that I hadbeen arrested, realizing that it wasabout 9 a.m., theycontacted UN soldiersand inforrned them that a Kangurajoumalistnamed Hassan NGEZEhad been arrested and had been reportedly killed immediately. The UN soldiers immediatelyasked the Invenzi if they had arrested someone and they said they had not. TheUN soldiers persiste~l and around 10 a.m., they entered the In enzi me wherethe y hadasked me to sit.¯ They were busy making a foolY hideoutof me.The and UN round soldiersfreed me. The Inyenzijournalists whornI mentionedearlier were still q uestioningmeas they waited for their leaders to finish preparing the document which theywanted me to signand which they claimed contained proofofwhat had happened in Rwanda.That was how I wasfreed by theUN be/bresigning those people’s papers and as suchtheir scheme was thwarted. I immediately complained tothe competent authoritiesandI still await their reaction.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ) 1 W~ Mathias Marcuss~
    ;) 1 W~ MATHIAS MARCUSS~ INTERNATIOI\AL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RvVANDA ;.'- CASE NC J.:TR 19"; THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIB UNAL l~.·~'--'~l~C:-T ~~ AGAINST RECEIVED HASSAN NGEZE ,'; ;-, ~", 1" ~ 7 _, .....',~! V v ACTION :e..e",=,~~ COpy ~ ~ Il\DICTMENT I. The do;;eCcor ufthe International Criminal Tribun,j for Rwanda, pursuant to the authority stipulated in Article 17 of the Statute of the TribllfJaI 01' the L'lternational Crim: al Tribunal for Rwanda (the Statute oEthe Tribunal) charges Hi SSAN {GEZE with GENOCIDE, DIRECT ANi) PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO COMMIT CENOCll ~, and CRIM.!!:S AGAINST HUMANITY, all offenses stip:llated in Articles 2.ud 3 0 the Statut.: of the fribunal as set forth belo N: 2, THE ACCUSED HASSAN NGEZE was born in 1961 in the Commune of Rubavu, Prefecture of Gisenyi, ,he Republic of 'Zwand At the tim.: of the eV~:lts referred to in this indictment, HASSAN NGEZE was Editor-in-Chief of the .i' 'lirna: knewn :.IS, and published under tbe name ot~ KANGURA. PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/085c26/ 3. CONCISE STATENIENT OF THE ACTS 3.1. The crimes inthislnd';tmentr)l\! plse in Rwsnda, between January 1 and December :3 1 of 1994. 3.2. During the events n:rerred to III this indictment, Tutsis and Hutus were identified as ethnic or racial group<;. 3.3. DLL inlS the events referre, in thi' indi . (ment, there were in Rwanda \\idespre.d or sy ~ematic ,ttacL '1gain-t a civilian population, including Tutsis and certa:n 1{utus, Oil poliucal, etl lie or l'acial grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are All Rwandans”
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles “We are all Rwandans”: Imagining the Post-Genocidal Nation Across Media A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Film and Television by Andrew Phillip Young 2016 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION “We are all Rwandans”: Imagining the Post-Genocidal Nation Across Media by Andrew Phillip Young Doctor of Philosophy in Film and Television University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Chon A. Noriega, Chair There is little doubt of the fundamental impact of the 1994 Rwanda genocide on the country's social structure and cultural production, but the form that these changes have taken remains ignored by contemporary media scholars. Since this time, the need to identify the the particular industrial structure, political economy, and discursive slant of Rwandan “post- genocidal” media has become vital. The Rwandan government has gone to great lengths to construct and promote reconciliatory discourse to maintain order over a country divided along ethnic lines. Such a task, though, relies on far more than the simple state control of media message systems (particularly in the current period of media deregulation). Instead, it requires a more complex engagement with issues of self-censorship, speech law, public/private industrial regulation, national/transnational production/consumption paradigms, and post-traumatic media theory. This project examines the interrelationships between radio, television, newspapers, the ii Internet, and film in the contemporary Rwandan mediascape (which all merge through their relationships with governmental, regulatory, and funding agencies, such as the Rwanda Media High Council - RMHC) to investigate how they endorse national reconciliatory discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rwandan Genocide: Combating Stereotypes And
    The Rwandan Genocide: Combating Stereotypes and Understanding the Origins Nicola Skakel Senior Honors Thesis Department of History April 9th 2018 Defense Committee: Dr. Susan K. Kent, Department of History, Primary Advisor Dr. Matthew Gerber, Department of History, Honors Council Representative Dr. Paul Shankman, Department of Anthropology, Advisor 1 Introduction On the 7th of April 1994, the small east African country of Rwanda erupted into one of the most deadly and intimate genocides the modern world had ever witnessed. Whilst the western world stood by and watched in just 100 days over 800,000 Rwandans out of a total population of 7 million, were systematically murdered in the most brutal and violent of ways. Those who were targeted made up the country’s minority ethnic group the Tutsis, and moderates from the majority group, the Hutus. For many, the legacy of Rwanda is a monstrous example of extreme pent up ethnic tensions that has its roots in European colonialism. In contrast, I will argue that the events not just of 1994 but also the unrest that proceeded it, arose from a highly complex culmination of long-standing historical tensions between ethnic groups that long pre-dated colonialism. In conjunction, a set of short-term triggers including foreign intervention, civil war, famine, state terrorism and ultimately the assassination of President Habyarimana also contributed to the outburst of genocide in 1994. Whilst it would be easy to place sole responsibility on European colonists for implementing a policy of divide and rule and therefore exacerbating ethnic tensions, it seems to me that genocide is never that cut and dried: it can never be explained by one factor.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Law of Incitement” (PDF)
    THE LAW OF INCITEMENT United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Symposium "Speech, Power and Violence" ∗ by Gregory S. Gordon I. INTRODUCTION This essay will explore the origins and development of the crime of direct and public incitement to commit genocide. It will begin with an historical analysis of the epochal Nuremberg decisions regarding Nazi hate-mongers Julius Streicher, Hans Fritzsche and Otto Dietrich. Although these decisions did not deal explicitly with incitement as a separate crime, they laid the groundwork for future development of incitement as a crime in its own right. The essay will then examine the official birth of the incitement crime with the adoption of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide ("Genocide Convention"). From that point through the next forty-five years, the crime was not actually applied. But that changed with the creation of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), which vigorously prosecuted incitement to genocide. Through a series of cases that progressively fleshed out elements of the crime, the ICTR jurisprudence set out the materials necessary to construct a legal framework necessary to analyze incitement. That framework was put to good use in the Canadian immigration context in the case of Rwandan politician Leon Mugesera, who delivered an infamous pre-1994 speech calling for genocide through a series of violent and macabre metaphors. The essay will conclude with an analysis of the most recent ICTR case to apply and develop the incitement framework -- Prosecutor v. Simon Bikindi. Bikindi, a popular songwriter, composed music and lyrics that provoked ethnic hatred toward Tutsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwandan Journalists Who Were Living in Uganda Went Back Home and Resumed Working
    Because of this history, the media are no longer trusted by the public and government, and most people are suspicious of the journalism profession generally. Under the new government, a few journalists who had survived the genocide and other Rwandan journalists who were living in Uganda went back home and resumed working. RWANDA 268 MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY INDEX 2006–2007 INTRODUCTION OVERALL SCORE: 2.29 RWANDA Rwanda lost almost all its journalists during the 1994 genocide; they were among the roughly one million Tutsi and moderate Hutu Rwandans who were killed by extremist armed militia known by the name Interehemwa. The genocide came after the death of then-President Juvenile Habyarimana in a plane crash Rsuspected to have been caused by rebels hiding out in Uganda. During this genocide, which lasted for a period of about 100 days, the media stood accused of acting as a tool of hate. Some local radio stations and print media encouraged neighbors to turn against each other. Hutu extremists used the radio to mobilize the Hutu majority, coordinate killings, and try to ensure that the Tutsi were systematically eliminated. Rwandans are still bitter that it occurred with little intervention from Western governments, and it finally ended when the rebel group Rwanda Patriotic Front and the Ugandan Army wrested power away from the perpetrators and stopped the massacres. Some journalists who are believed to have actively participated in the genocide were investigated by international human-rights groups and were arrested and charged by the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Other journalists chose to go into exile.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Rwanda Media Experience After The
    IMS assessment mission: The Rwanda media experience from the genocide International Media Support • Report • March 2003 Monique Alexis, IMS Consultant Ines Mpambara, Co-director of Rwanda’s School of Journalism Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................. 3 1.1 Background for the mission .............................................................................3 1.2 Mission Objectives..........................................................................................3 1.3 Method and Scope of work ..............................................................................3 1.4 Structure of the report....................................................................................4 2 The Rwandan Context............................................................... 5 2.1 Political background .......................................................................................5 3 The media and the genocide ................................................... 10 3.1 Historical development of the Rwandan media before the genocide .................... 10 3.2 The media during the genocide: the hate media............................................... 14 4 The media after the genocide ................................................. 19 4.1 Reconstruction of a destroyed media sector (1994 - 2003)................................ 19 4.2 Today: Absence of pluralism and constant threats and pressures ....................... 20 4.3 The new Press Law and the High Press Council
    [Show full text]
  • The Prosecutor V Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza, Hassan Ngeze, ICTR-99-52-T International Criminal Tribunal for Rwan
    TheProsecutor v Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza, Hassan Ngeze, ICTR-99-52-T InternationalCriminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunalp~nal international pour le Rwanda OR: ENG TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: JudgeNavanethem Pillay, presiding JudgeErik Mose JudgeAsoka de ZoysaGunawardana Registrar: Adama Dieng Date: 9 May 2003 THE PROSECUTOR V. FERDINAND NAHIMANA JEAN-BOSCO BARAYAGWIZA HASSAN NGEZE Case No. ICTR-99-52-T DECISION ON THE PROSECUTOR’S APPLICATION FOR REBUTTAL WITNESSES Officeof the Prosecutor: Mr StephenRapp Ms SimoneMonasebian Ms CharityKagwi Mr WilliamEgbe Counselfor FerdinandNahimana: r,,,,+.,Ib Jean-MarieBiju-Duval DianaEllis, Q.C. ! Counselfor HassanNReze: -O Mr JohnFloyd, III Mr Ren6 Martel 73 r.~ Counselfor Jean-BoscoBarayagwiza: N CO Mr GiacomoBarletta-Caldarera TheProsecutor v Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza, Hassan Ngeze, ICTR-99-52-T THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA ("the Tribunal") SITTINGas TrialChamber I, composedof JudgeNavanethem Pillay, presiding, Judge ErikMose, and JudgeAsoka de ZoysaGunawardana ("the Chamber"); CONSIDERING: 1. The Prosecutor’sApplication for RebuttalWitnesses, filed on 24 April2003 (the "Motion")in whichthe Prosecutor requests ten witnesses in rebuttal; 2. The Prosecutor’sSupplementary Application for additionalrebuttal witnesses on HassanNgeze’s alibi defence filed on 28 April2003 (the "Supplementary Motion"), requestingone further witness in rebuttal; 3.The Replyof the Defencefor HassanNgeze, filed on 1 May 2003; 4.TheReply of the Defencefor Jean-BoscoBarayagwiza,
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Manchesterhive.Com at 09/26/2021 04:37:55AM Via Free Access
    9 The Tutsi body in the 1994 genocide: ideology, physical destruction, and memory Rémi Korman Since 1994, bodies have been at the centre of the memorialization of the Tutsi genocide. For, in addition to constituting evidence in the context of forensic investigations, they are publicly exhibited in memorials to the genocide. The display of bodies aims principally to remind visitors of the historical facts of the genocide: not only the sites of massacres, but also the form these took. Far from being an incidental detail, the methods employed by the killers are an important source of information on the ideology of genocide which developed at the beginning of the 1990s. Spurred on by ‘hate media’, this ideology targeted the country’s Tutsi minority, more than 80 per cent of whom were exterminated between 7 April and 4 July 1994. This process of extermination was accompanied by practices of cruelty involving the infliction of specific forms of violence upon Tutsi bodies, in particular using edged weapons. In order to understand these practices, it is crucial to examine the history of bodily representations since the colonial era, and in particular the Hamitic myth which was elaborated in this period.1 While the terms ‘Hutu’, ‘Tutsi’, and ‘Twa’ used today did exist before colonization, they were reinforced by the arrival in the area of the first European colonizers, who exercised social control through the implementation of an ideology of racial inequality. According to Hamitic ideology, the Hutus were the country’s true indigenous inhabitants, of ‘Bantu’ stock, while the Tutsis were foreign invaders, of ‘Nilotic’ or ‘Hamitic’ origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded License
    journal of international peacekeeping 22 (2018) 40-59 JOUP brill.com/joup Rwanda’s Forgotten Years Reconsidering the Role and Crimes of Akazu 1973–1993 Andrew Wallis University of Cambridge [email protected] Abstract The narrative on the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda has become remark- able in recent years for airbrushing the responsibility of those at its heart from the tragedy. The figure of President Juvenal Habyarimana, whose 21-year rule, along with the unofficial network based around his wife and family, the Akazu, has been largely marginalised. Yet to understand April 1994 requires a far longer-term understanding. Those responsible had grown their power, influence and ambition for decades inside every part of Rwandan society after seizing power in their coup of 1973; they had estab- lished personal and highly lucrative bonds with European and North American coun- tries, financial institutions and the Vatican, all of whom variously assisted with finan- cial, political, diplomatic and military support from 1973 into 1994. This chapter seeks to outline how Akazu built its powerbase, influence and ambition in the two decades before 1994 and the failure of its international backers to respond to repeated warning signs of a tragedy foretold. Keywords genocide – Akazu – Habyarimana – Parmehutu – Network Zero The official Independence Day celebrations that got underway on Sunday 1 July 1973 came as Rwanda teetered on the edge of an expected coup. Eleven years after independence the one party regime of President Grégoire Kayiban- da was imploding. Hit by economic and political stagnation, notably the dam- aging failure to share the trappings of power with those outside his central © Andrew Wallis, 2020 | doi:10.1163/18754112-0220104004 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded License.
    [Show full text]
  • “Fully Aware of the Power of Words”: Morality, Politics
    “FULLY AWARE OF THE POWER OF WORDS”: MORALITY, POLITICS, AND LAW IN THE RWANDAN “MEDIA TRIAL" A Thesis by BRADLEY SERBER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2012 Major Subject: Communication Studies “Fully Aware of the Power of Words”: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Rwandan “Media Trial” Copyright 2012 Bradley Serber “FULLY AWARE OF THE POWER OF WORDS”: MORALITY, POLITICS, AND LAW IN THE RWANDAN “MEDIA TRIAL” A Thesis by BRADLEY SERBER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, James Arnt Aune Committee Members, Jennifer Mercieca Larry Yarak Head of Department, James Arnt Aune August 2012 Major Subject: Communication Studies iii ABSTRACT “Fully Aware of the Power of Words”: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Rwandan “Media Trial”. (August 2012) Bradley Serber, B.A., University of Minnesota Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. James Arnt Aune Incitement to genocide is a fairly recent and elusive concept in international law. First used at Nuremberg, the concept did not reappear for more than fifty years, when the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) used it to convict and sentence three media executives: Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza, and Hassan Ngeze. Using their trial as a case study, I use rhetorical analysis to help clarify both the concept of “incitement” and the role that morality, politics, and law play in genocide and its aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tutsi Colonisation Plan, Conspiracy, and Genocide in Rwanda
    False, historical, ‘accusations in a mirror’? The Tutsi Colonisation Plan, conspiracy, and genocide in Rwanda 1. Introduction The historical memory of conflict is an important factor in genocide and ethnic violence. Even if we discard accounts of genocides as inspired by unchanging 'ancient hatreds', real or imagined grievances and prior conflicts provide a rich reservoir of symbols and narratives. These could be instrumentally or sincerely deployed to divide populations, warn of prior atrocities that might be repeated, identify scores to settle, and recast the current conflict as an existential struggle (Kaufman, 2006). Often, these memories might be deliberately distorted or reinterpreted. Historical memory may correspond to the past, but it is shaped, rearticulated, and consumed in the present. In Rwanda, news sources like Kangura and RTLM repeatedly (and deeply anachronistically) spread the idea that Tutsis represented 'Negro-Nazi movements thirsty for blood and power' (Kangura, 1990a), or 'proudly marched under the swastika of their criminal ancestor Hitler' (Kangura International Version, 1992, p10). Such Tutsi-Nazi equivalencies were a key theme throughout Hutu power discourse of the time (RTLM, 1994a, p7; 1994b, p5; 1994c, p22). In other cases, elites might overstate the equivalency between the past and present. In Serbia, a key theme of the rhetoric used to justify ethnic cleansing, and in some cases, genocidal violence was the idea that its neighbours were on the verge of 'physical, political, legal, and cultural … genocide' (SANU, 1986) against the nation. Slobodan Milosevic warned that his citizens might be 'subject to genocide for the second time in this century' (Belgrade TV, 1992), and the idea of imminent threat was a particular spur to violence by Republika Srpska.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with General Sir Rupert Smith*
    Volume 88 Number 864 December 2006 METHODS OF WARFARE Interview with General Sir Rupert Smith* General Sir Rupert Smith served in the British Army in East and South Africa, Arabia, the Caribbean, Europe and Malaysia before commanding, as a major- general, the British 1st Armoured Division during the Gulf War. As the first Assistant Chief of Defence Operations and Security at the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence in 1992, he was intimately involved in the United Kingdom’s development of the strategy in Bosnia-Herzegovina. In 1995 he was Commander UNPROFOR in Sarajevo and in 1996–8 was the Officer Commanding in Northern Ireland. His final assignment was as Deputy Supreme Commander Allied Powers Europe in 1998–2001, covering the NATO operation ‘‘Allied Force’’ during the Kosovo conflict and the development of the European Security and Defence Identity. He retired from the army in 2002. Since 2006 he has been international advisor to the ICRC. His experience is shared to some extent through the words of his treatise on modern warfare, The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World (Penguin, London, 2005). Is there a change in the paradigm of war? Yes, I believe that in recent decades we have lived through a shift in the paradigm of war. What has happened is that in the past, in what I call ‘‘industrial war’’, you sought to win a trial of strength and thereby break the will of your opponent, to finally dictate the result, the political outcome you wished to achieve. In our new paradigm, which I call ‘‘war amongst the people’’, you seek to change the intentions or capture the will of your opponent and the people amongst which you operate, to win the clash of wills and thereby win the trial of strength.
    [Show full text]