DECLARATION OF INTEREST --- CHECKLIST FOR ASSISTANCE OF MEMBERS
Name: Councillor Cabinet/Council/Committee: Date: Item No: Item Title:
A Member with a personal interest must disclose the existence and nature of that interest.
A Member with a prejudicial interest must withdraw, must not exercise executive functions in relation to the matter and must not seek to improperly influence a decision.
Please tick relevant boxes Notes General (not at overview & scrutiny) 1. I have a personal interest in the matter but it is You may speak and vote not prejudicial. 2. I have a personal interest in the matter and it is You cannot speak or vote and must prejudicial. withdraw unless you have also ticked 3(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) or 4 below
3. I regard myself as not having a prejudicial interest in the matter as it relates to:-
(a) another Relevant Authority of which I am a You may speak and vote Member;
(b) another Public Authority in which I hold a position You may speak and vote of general control or management;
(c) a body to which I have been appointed or You may speak and vote nominated by the Council as its representative;
(d) the Housing functions of the Council where I hold a tenancy or lease with the Council, and I do not
have arrears of rent of more than 2 months and You may speak and vote those functions do not relate particularly to my tenancy or lease.
(e) the functions of the Council in respect of school meals, transport and travelling where I am a
guardian or parent of a child in full time education You may speak and vote and it does not relate particularly to the school which the child attends. (f) Statutory sick pay where I am in receipt of such You may speak and vote pay from the Council.
(g) Members Allowances You may speak and vote
4. A Standards Committee dispensation applies. See the terms of the dispensation
“Personal Interest” means
The matter relates to your entries in the Register of Interests, or A decision upon the matter might reasonably be regarded as affecting to a greater extent than other council tax payers, ratepayers or inhabitants of the Council’s area, the well-being or financial position of yourself, a relative or a friend or :- (a) any employment or business carried on by such a person; (b) any person who employs or has appointed such persons, any firm in which they are a partner, or any company of which they are Directors; (c) any corporate body in which such persons have a beneficial interest in a class of securities exceeding the nominal value of £5,000; or (d) any body listed under the definition of body below in which such persons hold a position of general control or management.
“relative” means a spouse, partner, parent, parent-in-law, son, daughter, step-son, step-daughter, child of a partner, brother, sister, grandparent, grandchild, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, or the spouse or partner of any of the proceeding persons; and “partner” means a member of a couple who live together.
“Prejudicial Interest” means
The interest is one which a member of the public with knowledge of the relevant facts, would reasonably regard as so significant that it is likely to prejudice the member’s judgement of the public interest.
“Relevant Authority” See section 49 (6) of the Local Government Act 2000 e.g. County and Parish Councils.
“Public Authority” advice is awaited from DTLR, it would include a health trust, a health authority, the governing body of a school.
“Body” here means (a) a body to which you have been appointed or nominated by the Council as its representative; (b) a public authority or body exercising functions of a public nature; (c) a company, industrial and provident society, charity, or body directed to charitable purposes; (d) a body whose principal purpose includes the influence of public opinion or policy; (e) a trade union or professional association.
A Member with a personal interest who has made an executive decision in relation to that matter must ensure any written statement of that decision records the existence and nature of that interest.
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20 SEPTEMBER 2005
______Report of: Council Secretary and Solicitor
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor A. Owens
Contact for further information: Mrs. Sue Griffiths (Extn. 5017)
SUBJECT: ORGANISATIONAL RE-ENGINEERING STRATEGY
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 The report advises Cabinet of the outcome of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee’s consideration, at its meeting held on 21 July 2005 of the decision of Cabinet on 12 July 2005.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 That Members consider the resolution of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee as set out in paragraph 3.1 in the context of the comments set out in paragraph 4.0 below.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 At its meeting on 21 July 2005 the Overview and Scrutiny Committee considered the decision of Cabinet on 12 July 2005 in respect of the above report and resolved as follows:-
“Consideration was given to the report of the Assistant Chief Executive as circulated and contained on pages 185 to 206 of the book of reports on the above item. The report attached the OR Strategy which had been produced with the assistance of Northgate Information Solutions, and approved by Cabinet on 12 July 2005.
A presentation on this item was made to the Committee by the Customer Services Manager and the Organisational Re-engineering Manager. The presentation explained the background to the Organisational Re-engineering; the results of the pilot project undertaken with the Council Tax service and the need to introduce a Corporate OR Strategy.
During the ensuing debate concern was expressed over the engagement of consultants and of the format of the OR Strategy.
RESOLVED (A) That in all suitable circumstances when commissioning the services of consultants Cabinet is requested to observe the full requirements of the Contract Procedure Rules without seeking exemptions in accordance with those Rules.
(B) That the Organisational Re-Engineering (OR) Strategy be approved.”
4.0 COMMENTS OF THE ASSISTANT CHIEF EXECUTIVE
4.1 Resolution (A) at 3.1 above describes the Council’s existing policy and practice in relation to the letting of contracts. Where circumstances require, e.g. in order to meet the Council’s objectives and having regard to Best Value, an alternative course of action is preferable (as was the case in this instance) an exemption to the rules may also be sought in accordance with the Contract Procedure Rules approved by Council.
4.2 In this context, it is suggested that Cabinet note the resolution in paragraph 3.1.
Background Documents
Appendices
Report of the Assistant Chief Executive to Cabinet on 12 July 2005 AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20 SEPTEMBER 2005
______Report of: Council Secretary and Solicitor
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor D. A. Westley
Contact for further information: Mrs. Sue Griffiths (Extn. 5017)
SUBJECT: LEISURE TRUST PROGRESS REPORT
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 The report advises Cabinet of the outcome of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee’s consideration, at its meeting held on 21 July 2005 of the decision of Cabinet on 12 July 2005.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 That Members consider the resolution of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee as set out in paragraph 3.1 in the context of the comments set out in paragraph 4.0 below.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 At its meeting on 21 July 2005 the Overview and Scrutiny Committee considered the decision of Cabinet on 12 July 2005 in respect of the above report and resolved as follows:-
“Consideration was given to the report of the Deputy Chief Executive and the Executive Manager Community Services as circulated and contained on pages 209 to 286 of the book of reports.
The report updated Members on the implementation and progress of the new Leisure Trust.
During the ensuing discussion the following questions/observations were raised:-
• Directors/Trustees of the Board • CRB checks on staff • Request for more information/presentation to Overview & Scrutiny Committee • Welcome extended opening hours/more activities/more staff/additional investment • leisure card – time/geographical restrictions • concerns over usage/explanation in respect of increasing losses • crime prevention issues • energy management
The Leisure & Cultural Services Manager responded to the above comments/questions and reported that in terms of losses these were reducing and there were no major concerns, he indicated that the Trust would be looking at the hours in relation to the leisure card scheme.
RESOLVED That Cabinet be requested to:-
i) submit 6 monthly progress reports to Overview and Scrutiny Committee ii) provide a list of Trustees/Directors of the Board of the West Lancashire Community Leisure Trust Ltd. iii) organise a presentation to all Members of the Council on the Leisure Trust. All Trustees and representatives of SERCO be invited to the presentation iv) advise the Board that the Overview and Scrutiny Committee fully support an extension of the hours of the leisure card scheme.”
4.0 COMMENTS OF THE DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE/EXECUTIVE MANAGER COMMUNITY SERVICES
4.1 Further to the request and resolution from Overview and Scrutiny Committee outlined in 3 above.
i. The annual report/review of the Trust, which will be reported to Cabinet in February/March each year, can be referred to Overview and Scrutiny for consideration and comment, with an interim follow up report presented to Overview and Scrutiny during September/October each year. This reporting schedule would commence from 2006 and would be included as a recurring annual item in the forward plan.
ii. A list of Trustees together with a short profile will be included in the annual report for the Trust presented to Cabinet/Members in February/March each year and if accepted (iii) below, can be included as part of a presentation to members in the autumn 2005.
iii. Following discussion with the Trust Chairman and Serco Leisure, the Trust partnership operators, they would welcome the opportunity to take part in a presentation to members, subject to committee timetables and availability this could be organised for late October early November and may include site visits during the day prior to an evening presentation.
iv. The Trust Board are considering the options for extending the leisure card scheme and will be advised by officers of the support from members of the overview and scrutiny committee.
4.2 In this context, it is suggested that Cabinet note the resolution in paragraph 3.1.
Background Documents
Appendices
Report of the Deputy Chief Executive/Executive Manager Community Services Cabinet 12 July 2005
CABINET: 20 September 2005
Report of: Council Secretary & Solicitor
Relevant Portfolio holder: Councillor G M Roberts
Contact for further information: Mr T P Broderick (Ext 5001)
SUBJECT: THE REGULATION OF INVESTIGATORY POWERS ACT 2000 - SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT
District Wide Interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To seek Members’ approval for the designation of an officer as a single point of contact (SPOC) within the meaning of and in compliance with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) and provide mechanisms for cover and future appointments.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That the Council Secretary and Solicitor be authorised to appoint a SPOC from staff within the establishment in accordance with the requirements of RIPA.
2.2 That the Council Secretary and Solicitor be authorised to appoint an outside body to the role of SPOC, as required.
2.3 That the Chief Executive, Deputy Chief Executive and Divisional Managers be authorised to act in the capacity of Designated Person, in compliance with RIPA, as required.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 RIPA governs a range of covert investigation activities undertaken by the Council. It consolidates previous legislation on covert surveillance, to take account of technological advances, in addition to ensuring that due regard is given to the rights of individuals as enshrined in the Human Rights Act 1998. RIPA seeks to ensure that a fair and reasonable balance is drawn between the need for law enforcement bodies to operate effectively, and the recognition of the individual’s right to respect for his or her private or family life. Compliance with RIPA should ensure that the relevant activity is carried out in a way which does not conflict with the Human Rights Act. This should avoid potential risks to the Council of civil claims against it for breach of human rights; information obtained during an investigation being ruled inadmissible in any subsequent proceedings, or complaints against it to the Local Government Ombudsman or the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
3.2 There are three types of covert investigatory activity which can be carried out by a local authority in accordance with RIPA, namely Directed Surveillance, the use of Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS), and the Acquisition of Communications Data. The principles of RIPA are that these activities should only be undertaken with the specific authorisation of a senior officer, who must be satisfied the proposed activity is justified, necessary and proportionate. The authorising officer is to be satisfied that the activity is necessary “for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime or of preventing disorder”. Appropriate delegations are already in place to allow for the granting of authorisations for directed surveillance and CHIS.
3.3 Following the coming into force of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Communications Data) Order 2003, the local authority is entitled to access “Communications Data”, that is, “any information (excluding the contents of a communication) about the use made by a person of any postal service or telecommunications service, and any information held by a postal or telecommunications service provider about persons to whom he provides the service”. The benefit to the Council in respect of conducting investigations, is that it will be able to find out the name and address of the subscriber to any relevant telephone number discovered during an investigation or a person’s forwarding or new postal address, or when or how often a person has communicated with another telephone number.
3.4 RIPA provides that local authorities may authorise access to communications data by way of a notice. A notice is given to a postal or telecommunications operator (“Communications Service Providers” (CSPs)). It requires the operator to collect or retrieve the data and provide it to the public authority which served the notice. A “Designated Person” decides whether or not a notice should be given.
3.5 A local authority is required to have Designated Persons to authorise requests for Communications Data and ensure that each request is both necessary and proportionate. Designated Persons in a local authority shall be at the level of (or above) Assistant Chief Officer, Assistant Head of Service, Service Manager or equivalent. Under RIPA section 22(2), communications data may be sought if a Designated Person believes it is necessary for the purpose of preventing or detecting a crime or of preventing disorder. The Designated Person must also be satisfied that obtaining the data is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved. If so satisfied, the Designated Person will decide whether to approve the issue of a Notice. Designated Persons should retain copies of all applications and notices until the Surveillance Commissioner has audited them. Training of Designated Persons will be necessary, but it is not a requirement at present. There is currently no requirement for an officer to attend an accredited course and pass an examination to become a Designated Person. Appropriate training will be provided from within existing budgets.
3.6 Power to access communications data is now regulated under RIPA, requiring authorities to establish a SPOC to generate and authorise data requests and to interface with the Telecoms, Internet and Postal Companies who hold this data. The procedure is for SPOC staff to undergo a training course accredited by the Home Office and then be registered. In the first instance, this procedure had to be completed by 5 January 2005. An Assistant Solicitor within the legal services establishment attended a training course and successfully undertook the compulsory assessment, following which, a Home Office PIN Number was obtained. The officer is therefore accredited and eligible to be the Council’s SPOC pursuant to RIPA.
3.7 Notices for communications data, as authorised by the Designated Person, should be channelled through the SPOC. The SPOC will deal with CSPs on a regular basis. Ultimately, the SPOC should be in a position to assess whether access to communications data is reasonably practical for the specific CSP, advise Designated Persons on the practicalities of accessing different types of communications data from different CSPs, provide safeguards for authentication and assess any cost and resource implications to the local authority and the CSP. There is no complete list of costs from each CSP, although recent Home Office guidance suggests that where a witness statement is required from a CSP, the charge for this service is currently in the region of between £50 to £135. This would be added to the Council’s costs which it would seek to recover in any prosecution that may follow the investigation.
3.8 As confirmed above, requests for communications data will only be made, where it is shown that the obtaining of the same is necessary and proportionate to what it is sought to achieve. It may be, for instance, that an investigator seeks to access communications data in a situation where surveillance has been carried out and either this has failed to provide the necessary evidence required to proceed with a prosecution, or where limited information has been obtained, and obtaining the communications data may assist with being able to prove a case at court. On this basis therefore, it is anticipated that in most cases applications to access communications data should be reasonably limited, as this course of action should be taken at a stage in the investigation process, when most other lines of enquiry have been followed.
4.0 PROPOSALS
4.1 That the Council Secretary and Solicitor be authorised to appoint an officer from within the establishment as a SPOC for the Council in relation to requesting and receiving communications data under RIPA.
4.2 That the Council Secretary and Solicitor be authorised to appoint n outside body to the role of SPOC, as required. This would be necessary in the event of absence of the appointed SPOC.
4.3 That the Chief Executive, Deputy Chief Executive and Divisional Managers be authorised to act in the capacity of Designated Person, in compliance with RIPA, as required. Members will recall that they are authorised under RIPA to grant applications for directed surveillance and CHIS.
5.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
5.1 The SPOC officer and the specified Designated Persons will have to expend time considering and authorising requests for data. These costs will be met from existing resources.
5.2 If an outside body is required to act in the role of SPOC they will charge for the service they provide. The likely cost of using an outside body for this service would be in the region of £40 per request for subscriber data, with a referral charge of £10. In the event of a witness statement also being required, the charge for this would be in the region of £250. Should an outside body be used, then a one off set up fee would also be required; this is likely to be in the region of £400.
5.3 Pursuant to RIPA section 24, CSPs, such as Telecoms and Postal Companies can charge for the information they supply. This, it is provided, is to enable them to recover their “reasonable costs” associated with putting in place the systems, processes and people needed to deal with the requirements of accessing and providing communications data. Where such costs are incurred, they will be paid by the section seeking to acquire the data, from existing budgetary provision.
5.4 The cost of providing necessary training to the SPOC and Designated Persons will be provided centrally, from existing budgetary provision.
6.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
6.1 Failure to appoint a SPOC and/or Designated Persons will mean that the Council will be unable to process data requests as required, to facilitate carrying out investigations in connection with criminal proceedings, all of which are governed by RIPA. This would have a negative effect on the Council’s strategy for reduction of crime and the fear of crime.
Background Documents There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this report.
Appendices None
ReportSPOCCabinet
AGENDA ITEM
CABINET : 20th September 2005
______
Report of: Executive Manager, Community Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor D. Westley
Contact for further information: P. Cooley (ext 5143)
SUBJECT: ARTS AND SPORTS SERVICE DELIVERY PLANS
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To gain approval for the service action plans for the delivery of sports development and arts services.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That Members approve the contents of the sports development action plan appended to this report.
2.2 That Members approve the contents of the arts action plan appended to this report.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 The delivery of Leisure Services is governed by the Local Cultural Strategy and forms part of the Community Services Divisional action Plan.
3.2 The Sports and Arts Development teams utilise their specialist experience and skills to attract and involve participants from all sections of the community in activities thereby delivering outcomes which contribute to wider Council Key objectives.
3.3 The Council key objectives are indicated in the attached plans in accordance with the following key:
Objective Ref: Working to create jobs for local people CO1 Improving housing and ensuring that there is affordable housing CO2 for local people Protecting and improving the environment CO3 Reducing disadvantage and inequality CO4 Combating crime and fear of crime CO5 Working with the County Council to improve transportation around CO6 the District Improving the health of local communities CO7 Ensuring local services offer the best possible value CO8 Valuing and investing in staff CO9 Informing and consulting local people and providing opportunities C010 for their involvement Insuring openness and accountability in the way the Council CO11 makes decisions
4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 The service teams operate a wide range of differing activities both independently and in partnership with other agencies. Particular successes have been achieved over the past 18 months by the Sports Development Team in respect of inter agency community based diversionary activity initiatives and health promotion schemes with the elderly. Arts development successes include the increasing role of the Chapel gallery as a centre for creative growth and the development of a major and sustainable Community Arts festival.
4.2 As always barriers to success relate primarily to scarcity of resources particularly staff resources and while both areas of operation have been successful in attracting external funding it should be noted that such funding is short term and there is a need to identify continued resources if levels of service are to be maintained or increased.
4.3 The cessation of external funding may have particular impact on sports development in the near future the possible conclusion of Children’s Fund Funded schemes in 2006 will have a major impact on the delivery of community sports initiatives
4.4 The Sports and Arts Development Service Plans appended to this report are intended to provide guidance and prioritisation of the strategic work of the development teams, identifies key areas of input, and links them to Council Key objectives as follows:
5.0 PROPOSALS
5.1 That members note and approve the actions described in the appended action plans.
6.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
6.1 The work of both the Sports and Arts Development Teams is aimed at meeting the aims of both the Community Strategy and The Local Cultural Strategy The work also has an impact on the Physical activity strategy and Local Health Improvement initiatives, healthy schools initiative and the North West creative industry Strategy.
6.2 Much of the work of both teams relates to community capacity building working toward neighbourhood sustainability.
7.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
7.1 Except where the seeking of funding is identified within the work programme all work included in the plans is intended to be carried out within existing Leisure Services budgets
8.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1 Risk to the work relates to the continued attraction of appropriate funding toward projects, which are currently attracting external support. Any changes to current arrangements will be identified and reported to Cabinet when and if they occur.
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
9.1 That both the Sports and the Arts Development teams provide a major contribution to the achievement of Council objectives and that members approve the attached Service plans in order to provide direction and priority to the work of the teams in the foreseeable future.
Background Documents There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices Appendix 1 - Arts Development Service Action Plan 2005 Appendix 2 - Sports Development Service Action Plan 2005
Arts Development Service Action Plan
Community Services
1 A: COMMUNITY ARTS, To increase access to quality arts provision within West Lancashire for all members of the community.
Actions CO’S Current Level of Targets Measures Time Partners provision scale Rose Theatre 1. Promote creativity and CO1 Annual Exhibition Continue to Numbers of EdgeHill College access to the arts through the CO3 Programme Improve Visitors to the Skelmersdale development of the Chapel CO4 gallery. Ongoing College Gallery Facility. CO8 Saturday Art Club Increase . ACNW attendance by Qualitative LCC Arts Unit 5% Quantitative Professional Artists
2. Investigate funding CO8 Gallery Officers role Expand to 36 Expanded role opportunities & achieve CO9 expanded to 30 hours a hours funding to develop the week. Continue to Qualitative Chapel Gallery & the Gallery Workshop rooms and café Improve the Quantitative Officers Role facility refurbished facility evidence
3. Develop opportunities for CO1 Pilot project developed Continue to Participants Participants response adults to participate in CO8 develop creativity. CO10
4.Develop visitor experience CO8 Gift Shop Improved Qualitative 12 Customers CO3 Exhibition experience evidence from months questioner
5. Manage and develop the CO1 Café in operation for 3 Good service café facility with the view to it CO8 months under WLDC provided. Trading account 6 months Consumers becoming sustainable. management. Staff Financially 2 employed on temporary solvent service contracts
6. Maintain a programme of 3 placements successfully 3 further Placement 12 Participants work placements and CO1 completed placements completion months Moss Lea employment opportunities for CO4 people with learning difficulties
7. Develop a marketing An Annual Publicity Plan Continue to Marketing 12 WLDC PR strategy for the Chapel CO4 Improve Strategy months ACE Gallery and Arts CO8 Six Months Exhibition visibility of the LCC Development CO10 Programme arts & develop Local audiences organisations Publicity plan for individual Local groups projects
8.To work in partnership with Partnership develop with Continue to Extend of 2 years WLCAO other organisations to PCT, Youth and Improve partnership Rose theatre increase awareness of arts community services, RAP Visibility of the network Phoenix Theatre activity taking place within the arts & develop Ormskirk School district audiences PR Department WLDC IT WLDC
9. Develop the existing Web Good level of information Develop Innovative Web 12 Page for the Chapel Gallery CO10 available on Web Page website – Site –providing Months and Arts Development. make Up to date
3 Arts festival information on information information the Web site. available on website Monitor of website usage 6months
10. Improve the accessibility Information available on Improve All application 6 months PR Department of information hardcopy accessibility forms available WLDC IT WLDC on the web
4 B: YOUNG PEOPLE: - To increase access to quality arts provision within West Lancashire for all members of the community.
Actions CO’S Current Targets Measures Timesca Partners Level of provision le
1.Develop Holiday Activity CO5 Easter and Summer Develop half Participant 4 months Professional Program for a variety of ages CO8 Holiday provision. term activities feedback Artists at Gallery & Other venues Young People
2. Maintain and develop Saturday Art Club – every Maintain Qualitative Ongoing Professional CO8 provision to full Quantitive Artist activities at Art Club other Saturday during term capacity & Evidence from Young People time increase range feedback 3. Develop Youth Theatre of activities CO4 Limited Youth Theatre provision to service the CO5 Provision. Drama project district during Easter and summer Develop pilot holidays youth theatre Pilot completed
project. Ongoing
Complete Skelmersdale consultation Forward plan College
4. Develop partnership process based on Edge Hill College Partners in place – working to facilitate this consultation Ormskirk School development additional theatre space results West Lancashire & Investigate funding developed at edge hill Ongoing Community Arts opportunities. college Identify organization funding Secure Funding ACE LCC
5 5. Providing young people First Take with the opportunity to voice CO4 Film & media project Complete Completion 6 Youth service their opinions. CO5 successfully completed. consultation months Children’s fund Working in partnership process. with Youth Service on young peoples
consultation
LCC CO4 6. Develop opportunities for Completed a successful Develop Response 12 Connections young people at risk of social CO5 pilot initiative. (PAYP) further months Youth Service exclusion. successful ACE project Young People
6
C: FESTIVAL & EVENTS To increase access to quality arts provision within West Lancashire, to assist in social and economic regeneration.
Actions CO’S Current Level of Target Measures Time Partners provision Scale West lancashire Community Arts 1. Work in partnership with CO4 Annual Community Arts Increased Festival taking Organisation organisations to promote the CO5 festival opportunity for place Ongoing development of arts related CO7 participation Numbers Skelmersdale Live festivals CO10 Pilot Folk festival participating Music Initiative Develop Venues Music Festival festivals participating Youth service Music festivals
Abacus Music
ACE
7 D: ARTS & HEALTH To investigate the use of the arts in promoting health and well-being
Actions CO’S Current Target Measures Timesca Partners Level of provision le
1. Develop partnership to Continue to Develop an action Ongoing Health promotion explore the use of the arts in CO7 Ad hoc project develop plan Environmental achieving health benefits and development partnership Health Services Investigate funding Working Health Trust opportunities to resource this activity
2. Work in partnership with CO4 Major Public Art Project Further trust New projects 12 / 24 Health Care Trust developed months South Sefton Health Trust to Completed as part of funded project Plan, develop and facilitate CO7 Community groups hospital redevelopment Numbers a projects focusing on the development of permanent participating public art and art activity within the hospital environment.
8 E: CREATIVE INDUSTRIES, To promote innovation and the growth of the creative industries within West Lancashire
Actions CO’s Current Level of Target Measures Time Partners provision scale
1. Maintain & develop the Number of sole Contemporary Craft Outlet CO1 Gallery Craft Shop Develop traders supported Ongoing Arts Council North existing outlet Turn over of stock West 2. Investigate the development of an interest Provide Scheme 12 Free credit scheme provided interest free participation months through the Arts Council credit Scheme North West
3. Improve environment for Advice and support Assist with Funding achieved 6 the development of Creative given to individuals / creation months Industries within the district organisation. opportunities Secure additional 6 resources Officer in post 4. Develop network for Limited support due to months Develop creative industries level of resources development within West creative available Lancashire industries officer position
6
5. Development of an Art in Successful Agency in place months EDU Initiated plot project Education Agency, to create pilot project LCC employment opportunities ACE RDA
9 F: ART N EDUCATION To develop innovative partnership with school and education establishments within West Lancashire
Actions CO’S Current Level of Target Measures Time Partners provision scale 6. Work in partnership with Ormskirk School & Cross Hall CO10 Working in partnership Access 12 Ormskirk School Community. To increase 1st phase completed Improved Trail completed months Community Groups access and develop public Complete art, celebrating local heritage. 2nd
Phase
Assist in Work with st Bedes High 7. Work in partnership with moving School achieve arts 12 Schools. Transfer sculpture school status months Education schools towards achieving sculpture from town Arts School Status form town establishments centre to school site centre to within the district
schools site
8. Work with Marharishi Assist On going Assist them with School in Skelmersdale to seek CO4 project development develop access to the arts funding
To Completion of 12/24 9. Investigate funding Reorganisation of implement program Months opportunities to develop role resources led to education of Education & Outreach development of and Officer. outreach
programm
e.
Improved Increased up take On going 10. To develop new creative Education & Outreach uptake of Educational 10 partnership with educational Officer position services establishments in establishments A developing network distirct with schools.
11
Sports Development Service Action Plan 2005
Community Services
A: COMMUNITY SPORTS DEVELOPMENT To develop and provide sporting opportunities within West Lancashire for all ages and social groups
Actions Corporate Current Level of Target Measures Timescale Partners objectives Provision . 1. Continue to develop a broad CO4, CO5, Recreation clubs, Extend into rural More Activities 2/3 years Youth and Community range of activities for CO7 Disability clubs Mini areas increase Service children to enjoy exercise leagues kick about areas community /open Rural activities Rap Partnership and increase levels of after school clubs space Schools physical activity in a fun opportunities Glenburn S C orientated way.
2. To work closely with cluster CO4, CO5, 4x extra -curricular Increase number Number of 2/3 years Lancashire Sport groups, school sport co- CO7 clubs set up of after school Sustainable Schools ordinators, to offer more clubs school Glenburn S C extensive extra curricular basedclubs programme.
3. Target minority groups and C04, C07 Multi sports clubs Increase Number of 2/3 years Youth and Community potentially excluded persons Informal Community participation Specialised Service in order to increase Sports Sessions activities Rap Partnership participation levels. Schools Glenburn S C
4. Assist with the integration of Children’s Fund Integrate disabled Registers and 2/3 years West Lancs. Disability disabled people into sports CO4, CO7 funded Multi sports club sports men & involvement in Sports Forum clubs strategically where s ans specialist sessions women into main mainstream there is a demand from (2 per Week) stream able body Clubs disabled people. sports clubs
2
5. Promote the benefits of CO4, Working with 3 clubs to 4 more clubs All clubs 2 years Lancashire partnership school/club linkages and CO7, achieve club mark & identified achieve NGBs encourage the establishment CO10 charter standard charter standard High Schools of sporting partnerships. Colleges
6. To develop and co-ordinate CO4, CO7, 2x Development groups 2 x development Development 2 years after school clubs CO10 set up groups groups operational
7. To provide quality support to CO4, CO7 Regular Development Programme Plan 2 years the boroughs school’s meetings with centre development plan implemented introducing sports and local managers for each building opportunities available to them in order to be involved 1Community school 2x community Wider range of 2 years in their chosen sport. programme set up school activities & programmes venues across the district
CO4, Limited Set up club Reg meetings 2 years 8. Increase/ improves the CO10 forums number of sports coaches, instructor’s tutors and sports leaders.
9. To seek to assist sports clubs CO4, 3 clubs seeking charter 4 further clubs Achievement of 2 years Local Clubs to improve their sporting CO7, standard seeking Charter standard NGBs infrastructure and to support CO10, standard the development of high quality coaching through clubs
3 B: HEALTH Develop and extend the District councils GP Referral Scheme Actions Corporate Current Level of Provision Target Measures Timescale Partners objectives PCT 1. Seek funding for an assistant CO1 I Full time officer plus Two new officers Staff appointments 2 years Health GP Referral officer. CO4 occasional session staff Promotions CO7 GP practices
2. Help to deliver NSFs (CHD CO4 1x life Matters Scheme at 4 1 extra Nifty Attendance Ongoing Ditto Diabetes older people and CO7 centres Fifty’s club Walk Programme Mental Health) 3x Nifty Fifty’s clubs Healthy Walk established Programme
3. Continue to improve and CO7 HILIT group Coordinated Regular meetings Ongoing Ditto develop links with the PCT partnership and other agencies working
4. Support in the delivery of a CO1 Review strategy action plan Action plan Achievement of 2years Ditto district physical activity CO4 implemented strategic aims strategy CO7
5. Extend target groups for CO4 Low risk cardiac Include 2 years Ditto participation in Life Matters CO7 Obesity High risk cardiac Participation rates Rehabilitation Mental health Diabetes
6. Devise appropriate evaluation CO4 Entry and exit fitness 6 month and 12 Medical records and 2 years Ditto methods for the scheme. CO7 evaluations month post GP follow up CO10 participation lifestyle survey PCT 7. Facilitate and develop chair CO4, 12 people trained to deliver 12 qualified Coaches qualified 2 years HP based exercise training for CO7 chair based exercise coaches Age health care Professionals. Concern s Serco 4 C: CHILDREN’S HEALTH Explore and develop a children’s health related fitness scheme to increase their levels of physical activity.
Actions Corporate Current Level of Target Measures Timescale Partners Objectives Provision
1. Seek funding to appoint a healthy CO1, CO4, No provision currently Appoint one Recruitment Ongoing Health school physical activity officer to CO7 officer Promotions & deliver the PA focus on the Lancs County schools in the rural areas. Council
2. Develop children’s Physical CO4, CO7 No provision currently Develop 1 Pilot I scheme 2 year Health Activity project linked to Healthy Scheme in a established Promotions & Schools initiative. rural area Lancs County Council
3. Develop partnership working with CO4, CO7 Limited partnership Establish Establishment Ongoing Health the PCT health promotions unit working with PCT Physical activity of partnership Promotions & and Lancashire County Council Partnership Lancs County Education Dep’t. Group Council
5
D: HEALTHY LIFESTYLES To promote healthy lifestyles by encouraging increased physical activity and lifelong participation.
Action Corporate Current Level of Target Measures Timescale Partners objectives Provision
1. Encourage workplace health CO4, CO7, None Reinstate Session Ongoing HR improvement programmes for CO9 lunchtime register OT WLDC walking and HP other initiatives
2. Support Lunchtime walks for CO4, CO9, None 2 participating Groups Ongoing HR other agencies and employers CO10 organisations involved OT HP
3. Seek funding to develop and CO4, CO7 20 volunteer trained 1 Walk co- Appointment Ongoing HR deliver a walking the way to leaders ordinator OT health scheme HP
4. Work with Health Promotions CO4, CO7, Pilot fitness testing Establish annual Participation 1 year HR to deliver regular Health CO9 sessions for council programme for rates HP Related Physical Activity staff held once 25% of council Presentations in the staff in year 1 workplace.
6 E: HEALTHY SCHOOLS To work towards the National Healthy School Standard as part of Lancashire’s Healthy Schools Programme.
Action Corporate Current Level of Target Measures Timescale Partners objectives Provision
Support the development of a Health in CO1, CO4, Members of Hilit group Establish targeted Inauguration of 2yr PCT Schools promotion and development CO7 team scheme LCC team. Schools
Organisation of regular drop in sessions CO4, CO7 None Sessions at 2 pilot Sessions 1 year LCC with the appointed Local Healthy schools undertaken Schools Schools Coordinator, offering advice, HP help and information to school staff, nurses and other partner agencies.
Support the development of healthy CO4, CO7 Youth Service health Increased Number of 2 year LCC lifestyle programmes aimed at young improvement sessions participation in programmes and Schools people extended participation rates HP Informal “ REC” sessions sustainable Y&C programmes Service
7
F: COMMUNITY SAFETY To develop a range of cultural opportunities for young people to minimise crime and the fear of crime.
Action Corpo Current Level of Provision Target Measures Timescale Partners rate obs
1.Reshape youth and play CO1, Community Sports Project Reduce crime Regular updates on Ongoing Police, Youth provision in order to achieve CO4, Working with community police in figures crime figures for & Community greater integration with area CO7 Skelmersdale and Burscough developing different areas of Service regeneration and community evening football leagues on kick about activity safety and maximise access to areas. external funding opportunities.
2.Work with community police to CO4, Working with R.A.P plus Increased Number of Ongoing Intervention develop regular sporting leagues, CO7 involvement Members agencies or events, played on the designated CO10 activities playing areas in the rural areas, to help reduce anti-social behaviour.
3. To develop links with CO4, Fragmented currently working with Improve Number of children 2 year Police, Youth uniformed organisations such as CO7, community centres and staff to offer activity communication and Community Scouts and Guides to provide CO10 with uniformed Service additional sporting opportunities. groups
4. To create awareness of all CO4, Links through RAP and Youth Service Increase links Number of groups 1 year Ditto sporting and leisure opportunities CO5 YOT and involved with available to young people in the C07 Connexions different activities& community, focusing on prolific CO10 specialist offenders and those at risk of intervention becoming offenders. programmes
8
5. Identify ‘Hotspot’ areas that CO4 Working with Skelmersdale Community Extend to all Sessions up and 2005/6 Police have high levels of Anti-Social CO7 Police areas of West running Youth behaviour and target these areas. CO10 Lancashire Community Service
6 To target excluded young people CO4 Four hot spots areas identified Deliver activity in Sessions up and Ongoing Police through a programme of informal CO7 hot spot areas running Youth activity delivered at venues in the CO5 2x Recreation evenings Liverpool Rd Community community. CO10 Hall& Service 3x Community play areas.
9 G. COMMUNITY CAPACITY BUILDING AND SUSTAINABILITY Develop a wide range of volunteering opportunities and experience to suit interests and abilities of all enthusiastic volunteers.
Action Corporate Current Level of Provision Target Measures Timescale Partners objectives
1. Continue to work with CO4 Millennium volunteers scheme Improve awareness Regular meetings 2years Lancs governing bodies and a range CO10 available in West Lancashire of MV scheme with young people to partnership of sporting, disability, training across West Lancs create awareness of and young peoples MV scheme Community organisations in partnership groups under millennium volunteers. Voluntary 2. Develop a pool of experienced CO1 Partnership SRB scheme to 25 Volunteers Volunteer database 1 year groups and qualified volunteers to CO4 kick start initiative until sustain voluntary and CO5 March 06 Governing community initiatives bodies
3. Work with club development CO4, Operating in Skelmersdale & Identify suitable Number of young 2 years Colleges & officers and identify young CO10 Ormskirk through colleges. young people to people continuing Schools people in the area who fit qualify. development criteria through schools, pathways Sports Clubs colleges and volunteers.
Advertising campaigns being Increase the Increased number of 2 years 4. Create awareness of CO4, developed. number of volunteers volunteering programme’s via CO10 supporting school’s, colleges’universities organisations and community projects.
5. Strengthen links with clubs, CO4, Already established good club Increase numbers Variety of sports community groups in order to CO10 links in Skelmersdale & & variety of sports clubs increased links widen volunteers and volunteer Ormskirk. clubs Increase made with opportunities. number of community groups. 2 years Ditto community groups. 10
6. Create local database of CO4, MV Registers Database Database 1 years volunteers and opportunities. CO10
11
Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 Part 1 AFFECTS
1 Crime and Disorder Strategies. Introduces anti-social behaviour into crime and disorder Community strategies. Services
2 Gating Councils can make gating order to restrict access to areas Community where crime or ASB are occurring. Services/ Housing
Part 2 Vehicles
Community 3 Exposing vehicles for sale on a road. Services Where a person has two or more vehicles for sale on a road within 500 m of each other they are guilty of an offence.
This provision comes into force in June 2005
4 Repairing vehicles on a road “”
A business or person undertaking repairs to a vehicle on a road is guilty of an offence
This provision comes into force in June 2005 “” 5 Liability of Directors
Where an offence under 3 + 4 is committed by a company because a Director has authorised it they shall be proceeded against as well.
This provision comes into force in June 2005 “” 6 Power to issue F.P.N.’s
L.A.’s can issue F.P.N.’s re. sections 3 + 4
“” 7 Power to require name and address
Offence is committed if person fails to give (correct) address when asked re. 3 + 4
“” 8 Use of F.P.N. receipts.
Receipts from an F.P.N. re 3 + 4 can be used for related purposes “” 9 F.P.N. supplementary provisions
Clarifies who can serve F.P.N.’s
10 Offence of abandoning a vehicle - F.P.N. Street Scene Operations Refuse disposal Amenity Act altered so that there is:- A £200 F.P.N. for abandoning a vehicle
The power to demand details The power to use of FPN’s “” 11 Notice of removal
Where abandoned vehicle is on a road, notice of removal does not need to be given to occupier. “” 12 Disposal
“” 13 Guidance
Guidance must be followed “” 14 Supplementary
Appropriate Persons
15 Illegally parked vehicles Police
Notice of removal
“” 16 Disposal “” 17 Guidance
Part 3 Litter and Refuse
18 Extension of litter offence to all open places. Community Services Litter offence can now be on all open spaces.
This provision comes into force in June 2005
19 Litter Offence – Fixed penalty notices Community Services The amount of the FPN increases to £75 or council can specify Council Offence to give incorrect name and address decision?
20 Litter clearing notices Planning/ Street Scene If detrimental to amenity due to litter LA can require removal Operations/ Community Services
21 Street litter control notices Street Scene Operations/ Includes mobile vendors in street little control notices Community Services “” 22 Failure to comply with notice:FPN
FPN’s can be issued re failure to comply with 20 + 21
23 Controls on free distribution of printed matter Street Scene Operations/ LA can designate land for the purposes of controlling the free Community distribution of literature on it. Services It is then an offence to distribute materials in this area
General
24 FPN’s
Amount can be set within guidelines
25 Exclusion of liability
26 Appropriate person
27 Litter Community Services Litter includes... Cigarette ends + chewing gum
This provision comes into force in June 05
Part 4 Graffiti and other defacement
“” 28 Graffiti FPN Council Amount can be specified – if not £75 Decision? \community 29 Graffiti FPN Services
Power to require name and address “” 30 Authorised officers
Delegated in writing “” 31 Graffiti removal notices
Can now be used for fly-posting
32 Sale of aerosols to children Trading Standards Advertisements 33 Unlawful display of advertisements. 2 defences are provided Planning This provision comes into force in June 2005
34 Removal of placards + posters Planning
Costs can be recovered for removal
Part 5 Transport of waste
Community 35 Unregistered transport: defence of acting under Services employer's instructions
Removes the defence of acting under employers’ instructions This provision comes into force in June 2005
36 Registration requirements and conditions “”
Changes in registration of controlled waste carriers
Power to enter to check on transportation of waste
Power to seize vehicles This provision comes into force in June 2005
37 Enforcement powers
Can require documentation, search vehicles, test or seize vehicles
“” 38 FPN’s
FPN’s can be used where documents are not provided
39 Interpretation
Deposit and Disposal of waste
40 Defence of acting on the employers instructions Community Services Removes the defence of acting on employers’ instruction. This provision comes into force in June 2005
41 Penalties on conviction. “”
Increases the offence penalty for s.33 fly tipping to £50,000
This provision comes into force in June 2005
42 Investigation + enforcement costs “”
Investigation costs are recoverable re s.33 offences(EPA1990) “” 43 Clean up costs
Clean up + disposal costs are recoverable for EA Waste Collection Authority ie WLDC Owner of land Occupier of land “” 44 Forfeiture of vehicles
Where vehicles are involved in fly tipping offences, a court can force them to be forfeited to the enforcing authority “” 45 FPN’s – Failure to furnish documents
FPN’s can be issued for £300 where people fail to furnish documents re duty of care “” 46 Power to search + seize vehicles
Alters EPA to allow officers who believe an offence under s.33 (fly-tipping) or s.34 (duty of care) can search and or seize a vehicle
Local Authority Waste Collection and Disposal
Abolition of requirements to contract out waste 47 disposal functions Street Scene Operations Contracting out no longer required
48 FPN re waste receptacles Street scene operations/ Fixed Penalty Notices are now allowed where the public or Community businesses are not, using receptacles provided or should be Services using receptacles (commercial)
49 Payments for waste recycling and disposal Street scene Operations Payments provision of s.52 EPA 1990 amended
50 Power to require owner of land to remove waste Community Services Supplementary power in relation to requiring owner not just occupier to remove unlawfully deposited controlled waste “” 51 Supplementary
appropriate person
52 Use of FPN receipts “”
FPN receipts for waste offences (see above) can be used for undertakings in connection with the function
53 Supplementary enforcement powers
Site Waste
54 Site waste management plans. Planning
Regulations will require construction / demolition sites to produce a site waste management plan, if of a certain size / type
This provision comes into force in June 2005
Part 6 Dogs
Community 55 Power to make dog control areas Services
Fouling, dog not on lead, exclusion from land, number of dogs a person can take on specified land is an offence Committee 56 Dog control: supplementary decision
LA must specify fine for dog offence up to level 3 Community 57 Land to which applies Services
Land which is open to the air and the public are permitted to have access with or without payment “” 58 Primary + Secondary authorities
definitions “” 59 FPNs
Fixed Penalty Notices can be issued for dog offences “” 60 Amount of FPN Council £75 unless specified Decision
Community 61 Power to require name + address Services
Offence not to give or to incorrectly give name + address
Police 62 Community Support Officers
PCSO’s can issue FPN’s re the above
Community 63 Supplementary Services
Overlapping powers
64 Bylaws “”
Can’t now be made for this issue
“” 65 Dogs fouling of Land Act 1996
Ceases to have effect “” 66 Appropriate person “” 67 Regs + orders Chapter 2 Stray dogs “” 68 Termination of Police Responsibility for stray dogs
Part 7 Noise – Audible Intruder Alarms
69 Designation of alarm notification areas Community Services LA may designate all or part of its area as an alarm notification area. Notice in paper + copies of notice to all affected residences “” 70 Withdrawal of designation
Designation can be withdrawn
“” 71 Notification of nominated key holders
If in a designated area and an alarm has been fitted – must nominate a key holder Failure to do so is an offence (fine – level 3) “” 72 Nomination of key holders
Within 28 days of designation, or within 28 days of having an alarm fitted – notify LA Key holder specification – local, have access, know the alarm etc “” 73 FPN
Fixed penalty notices can also be used for these offences
“” 74 Amount of FPN Council £75 unless specified Decision Community 75 Use of receipts Services
FPN receipts can be used re noise issues Community 76 FPN Services
Offence not to give name + address
Powers in relation to Alarms
77 Power of entry Community Services Where: - Alarm sounding continuously for 20 min or intermittently for over an hour And causing reasonable cause for annoyance And if in a notification area reasonable steps have been taken
Officers may enter to silence alarm, not by force
78 Entry by force Community Services Where 77 (above) unsuccessful + after a notice has been served a warrant can be applied for
79 Powers of entry: Supplementary Community Services In exercising 77 or 78 officers may take persons with them – must leave secure don’t have to reset the alarm + can recover expenses re-entering + silencing
Supplementary
80 Orders + regs
81 Interpretation
Chapter 2 General
Community 82 Noise offences: FPN’s Services £100 unless specified And power to require name + address
83 Use of FPN’s
Money can be used for noise issues. This provision comes into force in June 2005
84 Extension of Noise Act 1996 to licensed premises etc
FPN’s re noise offence can be issued to licensed premises
85 Supplementary
Statutory noise nuisances
86 Deferral of duty to serve abatement notice. Community Services LA can choose to not serve a notice if it will ensure compliance by another route but - If the other steps are going to be unsuccessful OR - The nuisance continues to exist after 7 days. It shall serve a notice
Part 8 Architecture and the Built Environment Planning
“” 87 There shall be a Commission for Architecture + the Built Environment “” 88 It shall promote High standards in architecture and design management “” 89 Changes S.of S. may confer changes “” 90 S. of S. may dissolve it “” 91 Dissolution Old company is dissolved “” 92 Transfer All assets transfer “” 93 Tax “” 94 Financial assistance S of S may grant assistance “” 95 Orders
Part 9 miscellaneous
96 Use of FPN receipts All
- Higher tier authorities
Money can be used for qualifying functions
97 Use of FPN receipts Parish - Lower tier authorities Councils
S of S can make regs in relation to Parish or Community Councils + how they use receipts
98 Supplementary Street Scene Operations Shopping + luggage trolleys
99 Abandoned shopping + luggage trolleys “”
Can now be seized AND removed and a charge levied for their return or they can be sold
100 Transitionary provision
Statuary Nuisances
101 S.N. – Insects Community Services Insects emanating from trade premises can be a nuisance but trade premises doesn’t include farm land “” 102 S.N. – Lighting Lighting from trade premises can be a statuary nuisance if prejudicial to health or a nuisance. With certain exemptions including goods vehicle operating centres (+ lighthouses)
103 Supplementary
104 Contaminated land: appeals against remediation notices
Appeals re Contaminated land to go to the Secretary of State
105 Offences
Offences re PPC Act now up to £50,000 penalty or 12 months in jail. This provision comes into force in June 2005
General
106 – 111 Minor Info.
Schedule 1
Licensed premises i.e. those that have a premises licence or a temporary notice (48 hours notice – no noise conditions) can be issued with a fixed penalty notice for noise
Schedule 2
CABE
Schedule 3
TUPE
Schedule 4
Amendments
Schedule 5
Reports
Ah/sw/cneb AGENDA ITEM:
COMMITTEE:
CABINET: 20 September 2005 INTERNAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: 21 September 2005
______Report of: Assistant Chief Executive
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor Bailey
Contact for further information: Peter Hamlin (Extn.5268)
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To present quarterly performance monitoring data for the quarter ended 30 June 2005.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 That the overall trend of improvement shown by the performance indicator data for the quarter ended 30 June 2005 be noted.
2.2 That the report be forwarded to the Internal Review Committee.
2.3 That call–in is not appropriate as this report is to be considered by the Internal Review Committee.
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO INTERNAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
3.1 That the overall trend of improvement shown by the performance indicator data for the quarter ended 30 June 2005 be noted.
4.0 BACKGROUND & CURRENT POSITION
4.1 Attached as appendix A to this report is a schedule showing performance monitoring data in relation to a number of indicators for the quarter ended 30 June 2005 This shows that performance in relation to 25 out of 30 indicators is on target or shows an improvement on last year’s performance.
• The proportion of rent collected is showing improvement with the best quarterly figure since 2003. • The proportion of Right to Buy offers issued in time has continued to improve since the introduction of the action plan and is now regularly exceeding target. • The number of complaints re stray dogs and/or dog fouling has shown a significant decrease since the end of the series of meetings with Parish Councils and other Community Groups. • The % of major planning applications processed within target has not met our high standards, an action plan is provided to indicate how we intend to tackle the issues. • The absence of two members of staff through long-term sickness affected the proportion of minor planning applications processed within 8 weeks. An action plan has not been provided, the staff have returned to work and performance in July was up to 75% • The average time to process “changes of circumstances” has shown another significant improvement this quarter. • The % of Benefits cases for which the calculation was correct is at 100% for the first time in over twelve months. • The targets for the number of calls dealt with by the contact centre and the number coming through on direct dial reflect the increasing number of services which can be handled by the front office and our desire to increase the proportion of calls coming through the contact centre. Consultation is ongoing on the most appropriate manner to tackle this issue and we anticipate a number of initiatives will be introduced shortly. In the interim we can see that the figures compare very positively against those in the same period last year. • The number of days lost through sickness/absence shows significant improvement and is lower than ever before. • The proportion of invoices settled within target is our best quarterly figure ever. • Usage of our web pages continues to increase and the number of online payments and interactive forms completed are both over double what they were in the same period last year.
5.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
5.1 The information set out in this report aims to help the Council to improve service performance and is consistent with the Community Strategy aim of making local services amongst the best in the country.
6.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
6.1 There are no financial or resource implications arising from this report.
7.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
7.1 Monitoring and managing performance information data helps the authority to ensure it is achieving its objectives and reduces the risk of not doing so.
8.0 CONCLUSIONS
8.1 The performance indicator data for the first quarter of 2005/06 appended to this report continues to reflect a trend of overall improvement in performance with most indicators on target and/or showing an improvement on the same quarter last year.
Background Documents
There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices Appendix A – Quarterly Performance Indicators for 1st quarter 2005/06
Appendix B – Action Plan – % of Major Planning Applications within 13 weeks.
Appendix A QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Key 3 = Performance on target for the quarter DATA FOR 1st QUARTER 2005/06 ☺ = Performance improved on same quarter last year (or 100%)
= Action required: performance not improved on same SERVICES FIRST quarter last year and is 5% or more short of the target - = None of the above
Performance Comments 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 Indicator 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 1Q Result Target
Housing Services (for more information contact Bob Livermore - 01695 585201) Repairs:appointments 97% 89% 96% 99% 99.7 99.7 99.6 99.9 99.9 98% made & kept (%) % % % % % 3☺
Proportion of rent 96.8 97.1 99.8 97.3 98.2 97.7 98.2 95.7 99.5 97.5 collected (BVPI 66a) % % % % % % % % % % 3☺
Average time taken to 26.5 17.3 18.4 18.7 24.4 19.3 14.6 13.6 14.0 19.0 re-let Council dwellings days days days days days days days days days days 3☺ (“normal” lettings)
Right to Buy offers 42% 52% 67% 35% 77% 88% 85% 94% 99% 80% issued in time 3☺
Performance Comments 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 Indicator 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 1Q Result Target
Community Services (for more information contact Dave Tilleray - 01695585202) No. of complaints re: 65 46 56 60 48 63 69 104 45 63 stray dogs or fouling 3☺
Incidents of dog fouling ------* * * This information is collected thrice yearly . No figure available in Q1
Use of leisure and 257k 226k 160k 238k 248k 254.5k 216k 252.5k 234.5k 250k The Easter holiday cultural facilities (swims period fell in a different - quarter this year than and visits) last. The accumulative figure for the six months ending June 2005 is actually greater than the figure for the same six months in June 2004. Street Scene (for more information contact Graham Concannon- Ext 167) No. of missed bins per 59.2 72.3 59.1 89.8 68.5 76.7 70.9 71.9 49 77.5
100,000 collections 3☺
Proportion of relevant * 12.55 16.7 25.35 * 27.07 14.39 15.51 * * * This information is land and highways % % % % % % collected thrice yearly . No figure available in Q1 assessed as not being clean or predominantly free of litter/detritus (BVPI 199a)
Average time taken to 1.31 1.30 1.23 1.31 1.29 1.29 1.26 1.31 1.51 1.10 remove fly-tips days days days days days days days days days days - Performance Comments 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 Indicator 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 1Q Result Target
Planning and Development Services (for more information contact Steve Byron - 01695 585165) Percentage of major 45.5 33.3 33.5 66.7 50 50 75 60 0 65 None of the six planning applications in applications received met the 13 wk deadline. 13 weeks (BVPI 109a)
Percentage of minor 64.8 69.4 69.6 60.6 80.2 76.3 58.7 75.3 55 75 applications in 8 weeks (BVPI 109b) Percentage of other 83.8 88.4 86.6 88.3 90.1 91.2 89.1 86.9 88.5 90 applications in 8 weeks - (BVPI 109c) Percentage of decisions 87.9 90.1 89.8 89.4 93.8 92.8 91.4 93.0 93.1 90 3 delegated to officers
Building Regs: % 67 55% 56% 56% 43% 37% 60% 54% 65% 70% 3 decided in 5 weeks
Financial Services (for more information contact John Gardner - 01695 585097) Benefits - average time 42.8 40 36 37 34.7 31.4 37.2 32.1 22.4 36 to process new claims days days days days days days days days days days 3☺ (BVPI 78a) Benefits - average time 10.4 15 13 12 16 17.5 19.4 14.8 12.7 15 for change of days days days days days days days days days days 3☺ circumstance (BVPI 78b) Performance Comments 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 Indicator 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 1Q Result Target
Benefits - % of cases 100 100 96 100 98.4 97.6 97.6 97.6 100 99 for which calculation 3☺ was correct (BVPI 79a) Legal and Member Services (for more information contact Gill Rowe - 01695 585004) % of searches in 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 working days (BVPI 179) 3☺ Customer Contact (for more information contact Kim Webber - 01695 585005) Calls accepted - - - - - 48.6k 49.6k 45.1k 55.2k 53.2k 62.5k Contact Centre ☺ Calls accepted – Direct - - - - 163.7k 172.1k 156.7k 159.9k 141.7k 138k Dial * ☺ % of calls to call centre - - - - 93.8 96.4 98.0 94.9 97.8 95.0 (577177 number) which % % % % % % 3☺ were answered Telephones: % calls - - - - 71.5 74.6 88.0 79.1 84.5 80.0 answered in 10 secs % % % % % % 3☺ (All) % Telephone calls - - - - 62% 76.5 88.5 68.5 81.4 75.0 answered within 10 % % % % % 3☺ seconds (Contact Centre) % Telephone calls - - - - 74.3 74.1 87.9 83.0 85.6 82.0 answered within 10 % % % % % % 3☺ seconds (Direct Dial) No. of services in front ------34 47 49 70 (by office (Contact Centre) March 2006) Performance Comments 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 Indicator 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 1Q Result Target
Cases solved at 1st ------36% 44% 63.5% 38% 3 point of contact
CORPORATE PERFORMANCE
Performance 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 Comments Indicator 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 1Q Result Target Sickness Absence (for more information on following indicator contact Clive Walsh – 01695 585019) Average no. of days 2.28 2.07 2.35 2.39 2.55 2.40 2.50 2.40 1.76 2.23 lost per employee 3☺ (BVPI 12) Revenue Collection and Payments (for more information on the following indicators contact John Gardner - 01695 585097) Proportion of Council 30.12 57.74 85.84 97.5 30.37 58.17 86.34 98.3 30.47 30.40 Tax collected (%) 3☺ (BVPI 9) Proportion of invoices 95.54 93.29 93.32 85.5 93.19 92.39 96.02 95.32 96.53 96 settled in 30 days(%) 3☺ (BVPI 8) Web Usage (for more information on the following indicators contact Kim Webber - 01695 585005) Use of Councils website ------134k 136.3k 136k 3 - No. of Visits Usage of online forms - - - - 205 173 181 531 630 250 3☺ Payments made online - - - - 359 427 552 522 858 500 3☺
APPENDIX B
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Indicator BV 109a % of Major Planning Applications determined within 13 weeks
Reasons for not meeting target
Major applications are complex matters which involve the input of a number of external agencies. Many applications are not submitted with a satisfactory level of detailed and technical information to allow a decision to be made and this can lead to considerable delay whilst we await the submission of further information.
Brief Description of Proposed Remedial Action
Preparation of guidance to applicants informing them of the minimum level of information required for different types of application particularly major applications.
Resource Implications
Officer time
Priority
High
Future Targets 60%
Action Plan
Tasks to be undertaken Completion Date
Preparation of guidance to applicants informing 31 October 2005 them of the minimum level of information required for different types of application particularly major applications.
Improvement Action Plan 2005/06
Theme Strengths Weaknesses Progress at end of Action Planned in 2005/06 2004/05 Ambition (3) Clear vision focused on Lack of clarity around how Corporate priorities Develop and revise the putting the customer first key priorities link with and values reviewed in Councils corporate Ambitions are consistent overriding needs of the the light of local priorities. Produce state with LSP ambitions and District needs/aspirations and of the District report are shared by partners Unclear long term vision agreed. Includes (Target: Cabinet Away Partnerships are mature The Council has only statement of long-term Day (July 2005); and inclusive recently started to provide vision and Corporate Priorities Strong and visible appropriate leadership differentiation agreed by Council councillor and officer around developing a between priorities and (September 2005)). leadership recognised by cohesive community non-priorities for (Lead: CE/DCE/ACE) stakeholders investment. Facilitate and support Councillors and staff Equality and Cohesion the work of the Multi- committed and Policy Statement Agency and Seasonal enthusiastic around a approved by the Workers officer group common purpose Council. Level 1 of (Target: Launch a Equalities Standard Welcome Pack (April formally recorded and 2005); Joint Policy assessed and progress Statement on cohesion made towards Level 2. agreed by the LSP Multi Agency Group (September 2005)) on Seasonal Working (Lead: ACE) facilitated and Facilitate and support supported. Draft Partnerships with Supplementary Voluntary Community Planning Guidance on and Faith Sectors.
1 Seasonal Workers’ (Target: Compact in accommodation place (April 2005); produced. Welcome Service Level Pack and Policy Agreements with Statement on Seasonal Revenue Funding Working in hand. Organisations reviewed Review of LSP and in place (March undertaken and 2006); Jointly organised consultation on Conference to launch proposals for change Faith Network (March undertaken. Proposals 2006)) (Lead ACE) include measures Produce and commence which will enhance delivery of an action cohesion, e.g. Multi plan following the Faith Network. review of the LSP (Target: Implementation (April 2005 onwards) (Lead: ACE) Prioritisation (3) Priorities soundly based No systematic feedback to Review of consultation Revised Consultation on community consultees. and Community and Community consultation and political Parishes perceive that the Engagement Strategy Engagement Strategy in vision. Council is not consulting progressed. place (Target: Autumn Effective use of research and listening effectively. Parish Partnership 2005) (Lead: ACE) and intelligence to Unclear how low priority Initiative launched and Work with Parish develop priorities activity is identified and listening meetings held Councils to implement a Priorities take account of how resources are moved with Parish Councils. Parish Partnership and respond to national to other higher priority Initiative involving the and regional priorities. areas. development of a Parish Resources aligned to Charter (Target: Charter
2 priority areas to achieve in place (December impact. 2005)) (Lead: ACE) Good understanding of priorities amongst staff. Focus (3) Strong focus on Inconsistent focus over the The Government Ballot tenants in achieving impact in last four years in accepted the Council’s Autumn 2005 on if it is priority areas, for determining the future of bid to go on the their wish to pursue example, customer the housing stock. Disposals Programme. stock transfer (Target: access and crime Some of the political A major consultation November 2005) (Lead: prevention initiatives. management arrangements exercise commenced EMHS) Focus maintained are not contributing in Nov. 2004. Continue to explore through political effectively to securing Consultation on ways of developing transition and in dealing better outcomes in areas of Master Plan and effective overview and with heavy agenda. need, for example, building this into a scrutiny methods, Cabinet portfolios and Skelmersdale. business plan including work with scrutiny aligned to focus commenced. partners and other on priorities. External review external agencies. Robust review reports produced and (Target: April 2006) mechanisms for annual Overview and (Lead: CSS) maintaining focus in Scrutiny report Prepare annual overview priority areas. produced and and scrutiny report and published on the put on the website. website. Work on (Target: September healthy schools 2005) (Lead: CSS). underway. Maintain and support the political management structure and the increased overview and scrutiny
3 arrangements including work on in-depth policy development (Target: April 2006) (Lead: CSS) Capacity (3) Self-aware about Structured and modern Management Identify training needs capacity. councillor and manager Development and prepare a training Cabinet Members and development programmes Programme delivered plan offering a range of officers clear on roles not fully implemented. for OMB. To be training for all Members and work well together. Financial position of the reviewed in April 05 in 2005/06 (Target: On- Robust human resource HRA under pressure. and roll-out going) (Lead: HRM) policies. considered. Achieve the Member Senior management team Reviewed and Charter award from is effective. streamlined NWEAO (Target: Enthusiastic and Development January 2006) (Lead: committed staff. Appraisal Scheme. HRM). Open-minded about Development plans in Maintain current securing capacity and place for training and services from external approximately half of development strategy bodies. Members within the Council to Strong general fund Good practice retain IiP status. (Target: financial capacity. exchange session held Spring - Summer Good commitment to with South Ribble 2005/on-going) (Lead: delivering e-government included Management HRM). targets. Development. Continue senior management development programme (Target: On- going) (Lead: HRM) Monitor usage and
4 effectiveness of intranet based training packages. (Target: On-going) (Lead: HRM). Performance Business and service Performance management Alarm bell system and Produce a strategy for Management (2) planning is well processes not yet fully improvement action rolling out developed. developed. plans introduced as organisational re- Staff are aware of their Underdeveloped part of quarterly PI engineering (OR) contributions through outcome/impact targets. monitoring. throughout the Authority effective appraisal. Risk management is not Commenced (Target: Strategy Financial management is yet consistently applied evaluation of Developed (April 2005); strong. across the Council. performance OR Manual Produced Under-developed management software. (July 2005); Deliver OR arrangements for Work done to review Projects (April 2005 monitoring that value for and align performance onwards)) (Lead: ACE) money is achieved. indicators to corporate Undertake pilot Value priorities and identify for Money Study comparator focusing on the Depot information. (Transport and Stores) New fast-track Target: Interim report by information system November 2005 (Lead: introduced for EMFS) managers and Cabinet Produce a Council to enable move from Improvement Toolkit monitoring to (including management. methodologies for best Analysis of BVPI value reviews; OR; results compared to Efficiency Reviews and other authorities Value For Money
5 undertaken. studies (Target: Autumn Further advice 2005) (Lead: ACE) provided to managers Provide quarterly on SMART target performance setting in Service information reports on Action Plan Guidance Key PIs. (Target: May (July 04). August, November New HR/Payroll 2005, February 2006) System installed to (Lead: ACE) provide improved Facilitate the provision management data. and comparison of local Seminar provided on performance indicator performance outputs (Target: Report management for June 2005) (Lead: ACE) Members. Evaluate performance Risk Management against national BVPI Advisor appointed and comparators and set training programme in future targets (Target: place. Targets set (June 2005)) Additional Audit (Lead: ACE). resource secured to Produce a new facilitate VFM work. Corporate Performance Plan (containing BVPIs, performance targets and corporate priority actions) (Target: June 2005) (Lead: ACE). Develop and implement an improved performance
6 management framework and appropriate monitoring systems (Target: March 2006) (Lead: ACE). Provide appropriate training for development of Members and officers in relation to policy and performance issues (Target: Responsive throughout year. Draft Performance Management pamphlet produced (June 2005)) (Lead: ACE) Continue to roll out corporate framework for Risk Management (Target: Training Complete (Summer 2005)) (Lead: EMFS). Promote VFM through internal audit reviews (Target: Ongoing in 2005/06) (Lead: EMFS) Achievement in Good achievements in Overall customer Overall customer Maximise the number of quality of service priority areas of satisfaction levels low. satisfaction now top services dealt with in the (3) combating crime, 53% of 2002/03 PI’s below quartile and up Council Centre (front
7 improving street the median and in the bucking the national office) (Target: 50 cleanliness and bottom two quartiles. trend (Autumn 03 services by December improving customer Not meeting targets in key figures). 2005) (Lead: ACE). access. areas such as recycling, In 2003/04, 59.6% of Finalise and commence 25% of 2002/03 PI’s in creating jobs, improving BVPIs were above the implementation of the the top quartile decency of homes and DC median and 69.6% action plan from the Successful launch of dealing with unfit private of BVPI outputs for Best Value Review of customer contact centre. sector homes. 2004/05 were above Customer Contact Partners perceive that the the 2003/04 DC (Target: September Council delivers what it median. 2005) (Lead: ACE). promises. 18.98% of land Develop a Quality Street cleaning inspection classified as having Management System for rated as good. significant deposits of all Environmental The District is generally litter/debris – within Health Services (Target: well maintained, clean 22% target. March 2006) (Lead: and tidy. New street scene EMCS). Benefits service rated as service introduced in Evaluate merits of fair towards good in December 2004. adopting quality 2003. ‘Blue box’ system for management system Strong customer glass, cans and plastics across Leisure Services satisfaction in relation to in operation since (Target: November the refuse collection and December 2004 and 2005) (Lead: LSM). planning application performance at end of Complete Private Sector services 2004/05 was 26.18% Stock Condition Survey and on track to achieve (Target: July 2005) 27% recycled by (Lead EMHS). 2005/06. Review and amend Achieved 91.4% Private Sector Housing interactions available Renewal Strategy electronically as at (Target: November
8 March 05 (top 2005) (Lead: EMHS). quartile) up from 77% Review existing empty in March 04. homes strategy and CSP opened in produce new strategy to Skelmersdale by tackle the problem of 1/4/05. empty private dwellings 47 services available in the District (Target: through the Contact November 2005) (Lead: Centre up from 17 in EMHS). 2003. Increase the number of Abandoned calls Council homes meeting running at under 2% the Decent Homes with target of 95% Standard by targeting calls answered investment on those exceeded. properties most in need of component replacement (Target: Reduce % of homes failing DHS from 31% to 24% by March 2006) (Lead: EMHS). Complete a customer satisfaction review of services delivered by functional housing teams and produce plan of action to address any service performance issues that are identified (Target: March 2006)
9 (Lead EMHS) Expand existing recycling schemes to improve participation and collection tonnages (Target: July 2005) (Lead: SSM). Implement new dry recyclable initiatives (Target: October 2005) (Lead: SSM). Expand the existing ‘joined up’ approach to working with Grounds Maintenance and other areas relating to street scene issues (Target: December 2005) (Lead: SSM). Ensure sufficient Employment land allocations are included in the adopted Local Plan through evidence submitted to the public inquiry (Target: September 2005) (Lead: EMPDS). Assist in bringing forward employment
10 land for development by preparing draft supplementary planning guidance (SPG) for land at White Moss Business Park (Target: March 2006) (Lead: EMPDS). Continue work with Partners to regenerate and develop Skelmersdale Town Centre through a masterplan and SPG (Target: March 2006).(Lead: EMRP/EMPDS). Implement facility to enable online submission and viewing of planning applications, submissions of comments and complaints of alleged breaches of planning control (Target: April 2005) (Lead: EMPDS). Establish a development team one stop shop approach for major planning applications
11 (Target: September 2005) (Lead: EMPDS) Continue to market and promote vacant commercial properties and suites within the Investment Centre (Target: Ongoing – March 2006) (Lead: EMRP). Complete disposal of phase I of White Moss Business Park (Target: December 2005) (Lead: EMRP) Work towards appointing a development partner to deliver White Moss Business Park (Phase II) (Target: March 2006) (Lead: EMRP). Provide project management input into the regeneration of Burscough Centre (Target: Ongoing till 2008) (Lead: EMPR). Develop a computerised business enquiry
12 handling system through the Council’s customer contact centre (Single Business Account) (Target: 2006) (Lead: EMRP). Develop a community/social enterprise strategy for West Lancashire (Target: March 2006) (Lead: EMRP). Together with Partners, contribute to the formulation and implementation of a West Lancashire Marketing Strategy (Target: July 2006) (Lead: EMRP). Achievement of 58% of PI’s improved Limited evidence of quality 71% of PIs improved Produce and implement Improvement (3) between 2001/02 and of life improvements in between 2003/04 and publicity plans for main 2002/03. some priority areas. 2004/05. service areas (Target: In Year on year and Limited community Overall customer place, June 2005) (Lead: ongoing improvements in recognition of satisfaction is top ACE/OMB). improving the street improvements. quartile and Produce corporate scene, recycling, No consistent or sustained increasing, bucking publications (Target: planning and community improvement in some national trend. Voice (Spring/Autumn safety. benefits PI’s. Best Value Review of 2005); Citizens Guide
13 Community safety issues Customer Contact and Citizens Guide for considered as part of undertaken for Older People (January service delivery. reporting Autumn 2006)) (Lead: ACE). Leisure services are 2005. Implement actions being transformed. Action Plan from Best identified in the Benefits service rated as Value Review of Communications having good prospects Community Safety Strategy (Target: As set for improvement. being implemented out in communications and on track. New strategy) (Lead: Community Safety ACE/OMB). Strategy published Oversee improvement March 2005. and development of the Results of Citizens’ Website and information Panel show 73.8% feel stations extending West Lancashire is a interactive content safe and secure place, (Target: As set out in up from 66.6% last Web Improvement Plan) year. (Lead: ACE/OMB). New Leisure Trust Procure and implement established January new benefits software 2005. Investment solution (Target: work at Park Pool and December 2005) (Lead: Nye Bevan Pool EMFS). completed. Review policies and Step change procedures in relation to improvement in housing and Council tax satisfaction with way benefits and business Council keeps people rates. (Target: 2005/06) informed (40% in (Lead: EMFS) 2001/02 to 64% in Roll out of OR –
14 2003/04). Previously referred to. Efficiency exercise in relation to printing undertaken. Re-instatement of VFM studies to sit as part of the Council’s improvement toolkit. Council Tax BPR pilot project completed and implementation in progress. £144K worth of efficiency improvements identified. BPR Strategy under development. Investment (3) Investment in Lack of integration of External Funding Co- Co-ordinate delivery of performance medium term resource ordinator appointed. £8m Investing in management framework. strategy components. Draft Regeneration Business Programme Significant investment in Co-ordination of external Strategy complete. (Target: ongoing) (Lead: main priority areas. funding arrangements Scrutiny and Housing EMRP). Improving approach to underdeveloped. investment referred to Maximise external communication and Scrutiny arrangements not in previous sections. funding opportunities to consultation. yet contributing to better Arrangements for support existing Investment in workforce, outcomes in priority areas. strengthening project business or companies management and Not met housing management agreed re-locating to West councillor development. investment needs. including production Lancashire through joint Strong external challenge of corporate project working with partners
15 and improving internal management (Target: March 2006) challenge arrangements. methodology. (Lead: EMRP). Successful in attracting Partnership Housing Investment – external funding. arrangement referred to in previous established with South sections. Ribble to exchange Scrutiny arrangements – good practice with an previously referred to. initial focus on performance management/hard to reach groups. Learning (3) Strong self-awareness. Arrangements for Initial assessment done Share best practice Open to innovation and effectively evaluating as part of IEG between ourselves and creative solutions. success of projects and submission. South Ribble Borough Learns from external learning from evaluation is Council (Target: challenge. not rigorous. Seminars held 3 times a Learns from previous Learning experiences of year) (Lead: experience. Councillors not collated ACE/OMB). Learns from and shares and shared. new approaches with partners. Future Plans (4) Robust future plans. No evaluation of the effect Conduct investigations Rigorous approach to of investment in IEG into ways of assessing service and financial value for money/cost planning. effectiveness of services Sound basis for delivered electronically developing IEG. (Target: Produce IEG Good preparation for 4.5 (Summer 2005)) renewing local plan. (Lead: ACE).
16 Plans supported by Production of Audit on research and developed Achievement on IEG with partners. against IEG Priority Priorities are reassessed outcomes and action systematically. plan for 2005/06 and beyond (Target: Summer 2005) (Lead: ACE).
Improvement Action Plan 2005-06
17
AGENDA ITEM:
Cabinet: 20th September 2005
O & S: 6th October 2005
______Report of: Assistant Chief Executive
Portfolio Holder: Cllr G M Roberts (Leader of the Council)
Contact for further information: Cath McNamara (Extn. 5380)
SUBJECT: West Lancashire Local Strategic Partnership - Community Strategy Review Consultation
District wide interest:-
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To seek a response from the Council to a consultation exercise currently being undertaken by West Lancashire Local Strategic Partnership (WLLSP) as part of the Community Strategy Review.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That Cabinet agrees to respond to the questionnaire as proposed in Appendix A;
2.2 That Cabinet agrees that this response be submitted to the LSP on behalf of the District Council, subject to any amendments agreed at Overview and Scrutiny Committee.
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY
3.1 That the response to the consultation exercise proposed by Cabinet should be submitted to the LSP as the District Council’s input to this stage of the process.
4.0 BACKGROUND
4.1 In May 2003, West Lancashire Local Strategic Partnership published its first Community Strategy. Based upon extensive consultation, the strategy detailed the Partnership’s approach to achieving its vision of West Lancashire as being ‘amongst the best, safest and greenest places to live in the Country, with local services that are second to none’.
4.2 Significant progress has been made towards achieving the targets outlined in the Strategy, which has been supported by the production of annual thematic action plans.
4.3 Over the 3-year scope of the Community Strategy, the actions undertaken by the Partnership have had a significant impact on the needs that were identified, and it is now timely to review the Strategy. This will ensure that West Lancashire’s Community Strategy is a focussed document that will drive the delivery of outcomes to further improve the quality of life and well-being of West Lancashire and its residents.
5.0 CURRENT POSITION
5.1 The current Community Strategy extends to May 2006. Appendix A illustrates the process to be undertaken for the production of a Community Strategy to supersede the current version.
5.2 The process as illustrated in Appendix B, has been devised with a view to producing a strategy for West Lancashire that will have a positive and significant effect on the quality of life of its residents.
5.3 As part of this process, a questionnaire was circulated to special interest/key stakeholders in August 2005. As the lead organisation on the Partnership, the District Council’s views are integral to the consultation process. The Council’s response to this questionnaire will be collated with those received from other partners to inform the priorities of the next Community Strategy.
5.4 A revised Community Strategy will be drafted from the extensive consultation and research that is being conducted in the coming months, which will go before Cabinet for consideration in April/May of next year.
5.5 The report on this agenda entitled ‘Review of Corporate Priorities’, details proposed priorities for the Council for 2006/7. The response to the consultation that is suggested in Appendix A has been drafted to reflect those priorities.
6.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
6.1 Undertaking this consultation process and other research as described in this report will ensure that the revised Community Strategy is targeted at achieving the outcomes that are most important in terms of improving the quality of life and well-being of West Lancashire’s residents
7.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
7.1 There are no resource implications identified at this time. 8.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1 The most significant risk associated would be a failure to incorporate the District Council’s views in the revised Community Strategy. This consultation exercise and the process described in this report mitigate against that risk by providing a number of channels through which the Council can input and influence the review process.
Background Documents
There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices
Appendix A: Community Strategy Review Special Interest Consultation – the proposed response will be completed once OMB has met on 6th September and discussed the Review of the Corporate Priorities Report. This is because the outcome of this discussion will determine how it is proposed that the Council should respond to this consultation.
Appendix B: Community Strategy Review Process Flow Chart
WEST LANCASHIRE LOCAL STRATEGIC PARTERSHIP
COMMUNITY STRATEGY REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE
West Lancashire Local Strategic Partnership (WLLSP) is made up of 85 representatives from Public, Private and Voluntary & Community Sector organisations. The purpose of the Partnership is to look at ways that these organisations can work together to improve the quality of life of residents in West Lancashire.
In 2003, WLLSP published a Community Strategy which outlined the overarching strategy to improve the quality of life and well-being of West Lancashire residents. Arranged under 8 themes, it was supported by a number of detailed action plans.
Much has been achieved over the last 3 years, for example people’s satisfaction with their neighbourhood as a place to live has increased to nearly 90%. Unemployment has reduced and is now at 2.2%, which is the same as the regional and national average.
Fear of crime has bucked the national trend and is showing a reduction – West Lancs has been rated as one of the safest places to live in the Country and this is still improving.
Major investment has been made in health and leisure facilities across the District. GCSE attainment has increased and more people aged 16+ are taking part in education and training. Improvements have been made to the standards of homes for people and the cleanliness of the District. There have also been dramatic increases in recycling and measurable improvements in river and canal quality.
The Community Strategy is currently being reviewed. As part of the process, the Partnership needs to know whether these 8 themes are still priorities for improving quality of life and well-being in West Lancashire.
Please take a few moments of your time to give us your views on how WLLSP can work most effectively to improve the quality of life of people of West Lancashire. For your convenience, a freepost envelope is enclosed to return your completed form in before Friday 9th September 2005.
How satisfied are you with the following in the District? (please tick one box for each):
Very Neither Satisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied Dissatisfied satisfied nor Very satisfied satisfied Very
The level of crime and fear of crime
The economy and opportunities for getting local people into quality jobs
Quality of Health and Social Care
Quality of education and training for all age groups
Your neighbourhood as a place to live
The availability of affordable housing.
Quality of the Natural Environment
Access to cultural activities and leisure facilities
Quality of Local Public Transport
How important do you think the following are in terms of their effect on quality of life? (please tick one box for each):
Very Neither Neither Important Important Unimportant Unimportant Unimportant Important nor nor Important Very Important Important Very
The level of crime and fear of crime
The economy and opportunities for getting local people into quality jobs
Quality of health and social care
Quality of education and training for all age groups
Your neighbourhood as a place to live
The availability of affordable housing.
Quality of the natural environment
Access to cultural activities and leisure facilities Quality of local transport
Please rank in importance the priority should be given to improving each of the following (please number 1-8 where 1 is the most important):
Working to reduce the level of crime and fear of crime
Improving the economy and opportunities for getting local people into quality jobs
Improving the quality of health and social care
Improving the quality of education and training for all age groups
Regenerating neighbourhoods and improving the availability of affordable housing.
Improving the quality of the natural environment
Improving access to cultural activities and leisure facilities
Improving the quality of local public transport and access
Is there anything that you feel would make a difference to quality of life that is not mentioned here? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………
If you are responding on behalf of a Parish Council, please indicate whether your priorities are supported by a Parish Plan: ………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………
Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire – please return it in the freepost envelope provided before Friday 9th September 2005
PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY STRATEGY
February Consult Citizen’s Panel on Priorities 2005 Analyse Citizen’s Panel’s views on Priorities April • Citizen’s Panel’s views go to LSP for discussion on Key Priorities in September (distribute through Exec and online); • Area Profile Work – Report to LSP in May. Information April- circulated to thematic groups September September • Circulate questionnaire to special interest/key 1st stakeholders (6 wk deadline; covering letter from CP) consultation stage
• Public consultation on Priorities, (key things that would improve the quality of life of residents), e.g. through the Voice, press releases, website; September/ • Study and analysis of relevant Government guidance October and legislation. • Summary report to Exec in November
• Analyse results of consultation exercises; • Collate results with Citizen’s Panel results, area profile, Government guidance; Information October/ • Rationali- November Report findings against Vision/Key Priorities/ PIs & Targets/Key Issues/What we know we need to do. sation Stage
December Annual Conference: • Present findings as described above; • Seek approval for revised Vision, Key Priorities,
targets and key issues; 1st draft • Identify ‘big projects’; develop- • Kick start thematic action planning process. ment stage January – Thematic action plans developed March 2006 • Produce draft Community Strategy for consultation
with LSP partners, other stakeholders, and the public; 2nd April/May • Conduct sustainability review. consultation
stage
End of End of consultation period. September
October/ Revise draft strategy 2nd draft November/ stage December February Launch Revised Community Strategy at Annual Conference LAUNCH 2007 held in February
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET:20th September 05
______Report of: Assistant Chief Executive
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor G.M. Roberts
Contact for further information: Kim Webber (Extn. 5005)
SUBJECT: LANCASHIRE LOCAL AREA AGREEMENT
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To advise of recent developments in relation to the Lancashire Local Area Agreement.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That Members comment as appropriate on the issues in 4.1 and on the outcomes and measures listed in Appendix 2.
2.2 That delegated authority is given to the Assistant Chief Executive and Executive Manager Financial Services to negotiate the terms of the LAA as they relate to West Lancashire District Council.
2.3 That delegated authority is given to the Chief Executive in consultation with the Leader to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Council.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 Members will recall that Lancashire’s bid to have a Local Area Agreement (LAA) has recently been approved by Government. It is Government’s intention to have every area covered by such an agreement over the next two years.
3.2 LAA’s are designed to improve coordination between Central Government, local authorities and their partners working through Local Strategic Partnerships. A report produced by LCC setting out the details behind LAA’s is attached at Appendix 1.
3.3 The negotiation of the LAA is to be completed by March 2006. There are a number of milestones leading up to this viz
• identification of main themes and outcomes by end of September 2005. • detailed negotiation of measures and targets by end of January 2006. • identification of those LAA targets where stretch performance can be achieved (and which attract reward grant – formerly LPSA). • signing of 3 year agreement by the end of March 2006, and annual review thereafter.
3.4 LCC have made arrangements to include Districts through:
• reports to Lancashire Chief Executives and Leaders. • reports to the Lancashire Partnership Executive. • reports made to District LSPs. • each District Council has been asked to provide a lead officer to sit on a County Group (the Assistant Chief Executive is performing this role). • LCC ‘block leads’ (ie. safer and stronger communities etc) head block groups involving District reps and are making contact with relevant District LSP thematic groups. • LCC have asked District Councils for a finance officer lead contact with whom to discuss potential funding streams which may come into the LAA; financial barriers; financial freedoms and flexibilities required; potential fund management arrangements (and issues arising); the potential impact on mainstream budgets and the financial implications of the outcomes agreed (the Executive Manager of Financial Services is performing this role).
4.0 ISSUES
4.1 There are a number of issues that require consideration from a West Lancashire perspective viz:
• What outcomes would we want to see from the LAA? Initial views have been sent to LCC based on recent LSP discussions and agreement on the priority issues for West Lancashire. In particular we have indicated that the following are key issues in West Lancashire that we would like to see built into any outcomes:
• Anti Social Behaviour • Tackling low skills/worklessness • Natural Environment • Transport – especially in rural areas • Neighbourhood engagement/social cohesion • Health Inequalities.
• What measures would we want to see against these, and what targets should be set? The draft set of measures proposed are attached to this report for information. • What financial arrangements would we like to see put in place? The detailed decisions around this will emerge over time, however there is an in principle decision to be made about whether we would want to aim for merging any of our funding streams with those of others in pursuit of the LAA, or simply ‘bend’ these where appropriate.
4.2 It is also important in order to gain maximum benefit for West Lancashire, to ensure that as much as possible of the negotiation and discussion is done at District LSP level.
5.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
5.1 The greatest risks associated with this project are:
• Time involved – the process of involvement is time consuming but unavoidable, and will inevitably mean that key officers have less time to spend on delivering the Council’s other priorities. • Negotiating outcomes/financial arrangements that benefit/add value to quality of life in West Lancashire. The senior level of officer involvement on this project will assist in ensuring positive outcomes.
6.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
6.1 At this stage the implications relate to officer time.
7.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
7.1 Subject to negotiations the LAA should assist in delivering the Community Strategy.
Background Documents
Either
There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices
Appendix 1 – LCC Report Appendix 2 – Draft outcomes and measures.
KWCabLLocalAreaAgree(sept05) xxx PARTNERSHIP – AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2005
LOCAL AREA AGREEMENT (LAA)
For further information about this report, please contact Judith Moore, LCC Principal Policy Officer, OCE Policy Unit tel (01772) 530690, e mail [email protected]
1. Background
Local Area Agreements represent a radical new approach to improve co- ordination between central government and local authorities and their partners, working through Local Strategic Partnerships and the introduction of LAAs is the first step in the implementation of the Government’s 10 year vision for the future of local government.
While central government will continue to set high level strategic priorities, the intention is that LAAs provide the scope for there to be more local control with local solutions developed between local authorities, LSPs, partners and Government Offices regionally to achieve Government targets and local priorities. They are intended to devolve decision making from Whitehall with a stronger role for Government Offices.
National guidance requires the countywide partnership to lead discussions on the development of the LAA in 2 tier areas and thus the Lancashire LAA will be led by the Lancashire Partnership.
LAAs provide the vehicle for a more mature relationship between central and local government and between local government and its partners. The 4 main aims of LAA are:
• To deliver locally agreed outcomes contained in community strategies • To reduce bureaucracy • To provide more flexibility on how funding is used to deliver local priorities; and • To promote working together in real partnership
LAAs can revolutionise relationships between central and local government if councils and their partners are adventurous enough to think ‘outside the box’ in developing solutions to local issues, and central government is actively encouraging councils and their partners to do this.
Although the negotiation of the LAA and the delivery of the outcomes agreed necessarily has to involve a significant degree of process, the aim is that LAAs will provide an opportunity to be challenging and innovative and that areas will strive to be creative in the choice of targets and the identification of funding streams and freedoms and flexibilities.
The diagram below sets out the broad principles of the LAA.
National Priorities
Funding Local Area Outcomes Agreement
Local Priorities
LAAs are structured around 4 blocks, namely: • Safer and Stronger Communities, • Children and Young People, • Healthier Communities and Older People, and • Economic Development and Enterprise
However, these blocks serve mainly as a means of structuring the process and most outcomes will impact upon more than one block.
2. Introduction of LAAs
LAAs were introduced on a pilot basis to 21 areas in 2004 and 20 agreements were signed in April 2005. In the first 20 pilots, an average of 40 funding streams and over £800m of Government funding went into LAAs. On average, each LAA included 64 targets instead of the hundreds that councils and partners were previously required to meet.
The second round of LAAs was announced in April 2005 and Lancashire County Council together with its partners, submitted an expression of interest to be in the second round. The expression of interest was signed by key partners to show their support for the submission. A copy of the document is attached at Appendix A. Lancashire’s bid was successful and the Lancashire LAA is due to begin in April 2006.
3. Bringing LAAs and Local Public Service Agreements (LPSA) together
The pilot LAAs have shown that it makes sense to bring together the processes for LPSAs and LAAs, and to that end, LPSA negotiations are to transfer from departmental teams to Government Offices, which are already responsible for overseeing LAA negotiations. LPSAs will be merged within the LAA and will become the reward element of the LAA. A number of priority outcomes with targets will be agreed for the full LAA and then 12 of those targets will be selected for stretch targets which, if achieved, will derive Performance Reward Grant.
4. Development of the Lancashire LAA
The starting point for development of the Lancashire LAA will be to use existing data and intelligence to identify the issues and problems in Lancashire and to prioritise and agree joint solutions to these issues and problems. This approach has already been adopted in the development of the Lancashire wide Community Strategy, Ambition Lancashire, which used information from the State of Lancashire Report, consultation data, priorities from district level Community Strategies and a visioning event held at the Swallow Hotel to identify issues and problems, aspirations and priorities. Lancashire’s LAA should therefore be grounded in Ambition Lancashire.
During February and March 2005, research, analysis of plans and strategies and consultation with a wide range of partners was undertaken to identify priorities for a second generation Local Public Service Agreement (LPSA 2) and the Safer and Stronger Communities ‘mini’ LAA (which will now become the Safer and Stronger Communities block of the LAA). This can now be used to inform the development of the Lancashire LAA. The priority outcomes and possible measures identified through this work, and the links with priorities in Ambition Lancashire are contained in Appendix B.
This should not however be seen as a constraint, but more of the starting point to begin the detailed process of prioritisation and negotiation with partners and with Government Office. Broad outcomes from Ambition Lancashire may be agreed as the broad outcomes for the LAA, with specific targets being based around neighbourhoods and their specific issues and in particular (but not exclusively) in areas of high deprivation.
This approach should ensure that the LAA is not seen as a new initiative but rather as a potential delivery plan for Ambition Lancashire, which itself is underpinned by the district community strategies.
5. Neighbourhood Focus
The Lancashire Partnership is keen to ensure that Lancashire’s LAA focuses on the needs of individual communities and neighbourhoods, within the context of an over- arching strategic framework. It will be important that outcomes for the Lancashire LAA are expressed in sufficiently broad terms to allow for local flexibility, perhaps, for example, focussing on areas or wards of greatest need. The LAA ‘Expression of Interest’ highlighted the Lancashire Partnership’s aim of focussing on local areas of need and opportunity and work is now progressing to gather profile and performance data at ward and super output area levels. As we move forward with LAAs it is hoped that communities at ward level will work with ward councillors to identify priorities for their ward for inclusion and put them forward through district LSPs for inclusion in future Local Area Agreements.
6. Process
Despite the exciting challenge that a Lancashire LAA presents, the tight timescale within which the LAA has to be agreed will necessarily require robust project management to ensure that all key milestones are met within the required timescales.
A draft project plan has therefore been developed. The plan falls broadly into 4 areas, namely governance arrangements, performance management, fund management and a section for each of the 4 LAA blocks. The plan also includes generic arrangements such as management and reporting arrangements, and communication.
Key managerial arrangements for the LAA proposed in the project plan include:
• The need for a lead LAA contact from every partner • The establishment of a Lancashire Partnership board or steering group to develop and oversee the delivery of the LAA • The clarification of existing countywide partnerships or the creation of new forums for each block comprising key partner representatives similar to the one established for the Safer and Stronger Communities block . A key issue will be to ensure that the LSPs, and especially their thematic groups, contribute to the development and delivery of the outcomes under each of the LAA blocks • 2 full partner conferences on 11th October and early February (date to be arranged) • The early development of a communication strategy
Key milestones include: • identification of the main themes/outcomes by the end of September 2005. The starting point for this will be the long list of priority outcomes shown at Appendix B • detailed negotiation of measures and targets by the end of January 2006 • identification and negotiation of those LAA targets where stretch performance can be achieved and for which performance reward grant can be earned (formerly known as LPSA targets and now known as the LAA reward element) and • signing of the agreement by the end of March 2006. Although LAAs are 3 year agreements, they will be reviewed annually.
7. Resourcing the LAA
Consideration is currently being given to the resources required to develop and deliver the LAA. Initially the following lead officers have been identified:
Lancashire County Council LAA Project lead – Joanne Platt Lancashire County Council LAA Coordinator – Judith Moore Lancashire County Council LAA Governance lead – Andy Mullaney
There will be four block leads:
Safer and Stronger Communities – Colleen Martin (LCC), secondee from Police to be determined Healthier Communities and Older People – Hilary Martin (LCC - health), Alex Sunderland (LCC- older people), PCT member to be determined Children and Young People – Geoff Hiscox (LCC) , Sheila Blakey (LCC) Economic Development and Enterprise – Steve Dean(LCDL), Barrie Moreton (LCDL)
Once confirmed, block leads will be fully briefed and asked to produce a detailed project plan consistent with the milestones in the overarching LAA project plan, and to quickly establish partner working groups and interim governance arrangements for those groups.
Partners’ roles also need to be agreed as soon as possible and partners are being asked to take a pro-active role in the LAA negotiations as well as in the delivery of the LAA. Taking on board the lessons we have learned from LPSA1, partners will be actively engaged throughout the process rather than merely consulted or invited to comment / respond to requests for information. This will include research and / or consultation with their own key stakeholders, working with LCC in the development of the performance management and governance arrangements and in identifying funding streams and potential freedoms and flexibilities, and developing and managing their own internal communications, project management and reporting arrangements.
8. Monitoring and Reporting Arrangements
Lancashire County Council, as the accountable body, will put in place the following project management and reporting arrangements in line with the overall LAA project plan:
• Monthly reports to LCC County Management Board • Bi-monthly reports to LCC Cabinet and Overview and Scrutiny Management Panel • Reports to each meeting of the Lancashire Chief Executives • Reports to each meeting of the Lancashire Leaders and Chief Executives • Reports to each meeting of the Lancashire Partnership Executive
Block leads will supplement these arrangements with monitoring and reporting relating specifically to their block, and, as mentioned above, partners will be asked to address their own specific monitoring and reporting arrangements.
9 Recommendations
The Partnership is asked to:
• Note the success of Lancashire’s bid to be in the second round of LAAs and that the Lancashire LAA will start in April 2006 • Comment upon the long list of priority outcomes shown at Appendix B by the end of August 2005 • Agree that the Partnership will contribute to the development and delivery of the blocks through the thematic groups of the Partnership
Judith Moore LAA Co-ordinator Lancashire County Council 4.8.05
LAA/CPA Theme Outcomes Possible Target Measures Baseline Links to supporting evidence data Ambition Lancashire * LCC/BC/Partners' Strategies Consultation Survey analysis Areas of poor performance ** National PSAs Available (linked to district community strategies) National Policing Plan Safer & Stronger Reduction in anti social behaviour Anti social behaviour incidents: AL114 & AL 117 All district CDRP strategies Conference 3/05 LiL Survey 2003 Priority 1 Nat PSA 1 Communities BVPI127 All community strategies Wyre LSP BVPI176 CPS Area Business Plan Preston LSP BVPI189 Hyndburn Neighbourhood South Ribble LSP Renewal Strategy Ribble Valley LSP (prevention of youth offending) (See also CYP) ECS Directorate (on school transport) Env Directorate
Reduction in fear of crime Survey AL 115 All district CDRP strategies LiL Panel Wave 11 Community Participation (PACT,etc) AL 116 Police ECS Directorate All community strategies
Reduction of alcohol related crime Violent offences - licensed premises (BV 127c) AL 121 All district CDRP strategies Lancaster CC Burnley,Chorley,Hyndburn,Lancaster, Pendle,Preston,Rossendale & Wyre in bottom quartile in 2003/4 Violent offences - under influence (BV 127d) AL 121 Burnley,Chorley,Hyndburn,Lancaster, Pendle,Preston,Rossendale, Wyre & Sth Ribble in bottom quartile in 2003/4
Reduction in violent crime Violent Offences by stranger(BV 127a) AL 133 All district CDRP strategies Hyndburn BC Burnley,Hyndburn,Lancaster &Preston Racial violence incidents Fylde Community Plan in bottom quartile in 2003/4 Preston Community Strategy Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy
Reduction of domestic violence No of refuge spaces/1000 pop. BV 176 AL 124 All district CDRP strategies Lancaster CC Burnley, Chorley, Fylde, Lancaster, No of DV incidents reported Hyndburn Neighbourhood Rossendale & Wyre in bottom quartile Renewal Strategy in 2003/4 West Lancashire Community Strategy
Reduction of fires & fire-related deaths No of accidental dwelling fires Yes AL123 & AL126 LFRS Strategy Conference 3/05 Nat. PSA 3 & injuries Lancaster Comm Strategy Wyre LSP No of deaths & injuries arising from accidental dwelling fires Yes AL123 & AL126 All CDRP strategies No of deliberate fires AL123 Wyre Community Plan Fylde Community Plan Chorley Community Strategy
Reduction of serious injuries & No of KSIs BV99 - 10 indicators AL120 & AL122 Burnley BC Conference 3/05 Lancs performance against BVPP99 deaths from road traffic accidents older people/children Env Directorate in bottom quartile for 9 out of 10 sub No of 20 mph zones Health Inequalities Framework Conference 3/05 indicators and below England average Lancaster Comm Strategy for national floor target 26 (Overall Wyre Community Plan Fylde Community Strategy All CDRP strategies Preston Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy
Sustainable communites/cohesion Volunteers Preston Neighbourhood Renewal LiL Panel Wave 12 road casualties) in 2003/4 % of volunteers AL 111 Strategy
participation in democracy/local decision making AL 108 Lancaster Comm Strategy Lancaster CC LiL Survey 2003 Priority 7 Wyre Community Plan Lancaster LSP LiL Panel Wave 12 Preston Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Fylde LSP No of young people involved in Youth Councils AL 086 Chorley Community Strategy Chorley CC Rossendale Community Strategy Wyre LSP Ribble Valley LSP Rossendale LSP Pendle LSP Chorley BC
Multi cultural opportunities Ribble Valley BC Corp. Plan South Ribble BC Corp Strategy Hyndburn BC Corporate Plan Ribble Valley Community Strategy Pendle BC Corporate Plan %of economically active BME people AL 007 Preston CC Corporate Plan No of racial incidents recorded by councils AL 113 Preston Community Strategy Pendle Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Community engagement AL 111 support for/commissioning from VCFS AL 111 Community engagement (log) AL 108 CPS Area Business Plan Pendle LSP Participation in neighbourhhood watch schemes AL 106 Fylde Community Plan Rossendale LSP Tenant participation Ribble Valley Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy neighbourhood management/liveability AL119
Improved streetscene No of Litter incidents AL166 West Lancs DC Corp Plan Preston LSP LiL Survey 2003 Priority 5 No of dog fouling indicents AL166 Pendle Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy LiL Panel Wave 10 Incidents of fly tipping AL166 Ribble Valley Community Strategy Ribble Valley BC LiL Panel Wave 11 Time taken to remove tipped items AL166 Fylde BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn BC LiL Panel Wave 12 % pop. Satisfied with cleanliness of their area AL166 Ribble Valley BC Corp Plan LiL Survey 2003 % areas on top 2 cleanliness categories - street cleanliness index AL166 South Ribble BC Corp Strategy BVPI Satisfaction 2003/4 BVPI 199 Yes AL166 Wyre BC Corporate Plan Play equipment available for children AL 175 Lancaster Comm Strategy Lancaster CC Corporate Plan Fylde Community Plan LCC Environment Directorate South Ribble Community Strategy Preston CC Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Preston Community Strategy Chorley Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn Community Strategy Pendle Community Strategy Rossendale Community strategy
Attractive parks & open spaces % increase in area of native woodland AL175 Hyndburn BC Corporate Plan Ribble Valley DC LiL Survey 2003 Priority 5 clean waterways/bathing water? AL 162 Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy LiL Panel Wave 8 % pop satisfied with parks & open spaces AL 175 Hyndburn Community Strategy LiL Panel Wave 10 Area of open spce improved AL 175 Fylde BC Corporate Plan LiL Panel Wave 12 No of tress planted/year AL 164 & AL 171 & AL 172West Lancs DC Corp Plan BVPI Satisfaction 2003/4 No of wildlife habitats AL 172 Wyre BC Corporate Plan Miles rights of way available AL 027 South Ribble Community Strategy No of play areas Al 175 Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy Pendle Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Greater access to services Physical access % pop. Within 1km of 5 basic services AL019 Hyndburn & Ribble Valley PCT Delivery Plan Chorley BC Ribble Valley Community Strategy
Electronic access No of users of contact centre(s) AL022 West Lancs DC Corp Plan Chorley BC BVPI 157 Yes Burnley BC Corporate Plan % public satisfied with services provided by councils AL 022 Fylde BC Corporate Plan LiL Survey 2003 Chorley BC Corporate Plan BVPI Satisfaction 2003/4 West Lancashire DC Corporate Plan
Housing Availability No of dwellings built on previously developed AL138 & AL139 Pendle BC Corporate Plan LiL Panel Wave 10 land Preston Community Strategy Hyndburn BC Corporate Plan Chorley BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn Community Strategy No of vacant houses as % of total stock AL140 Preston Community Strategy Pendle Community Strategy No of affordable, specialist & supported AL143 & AL144 Wyre BC Corp Plan Wyre LSP LiL Survey 2003 Priority 8 homes Wyre Community Plan Wyre BC % affordable homes on new housing sites AL 143 Fylde Community Plan Ribble Valley BC Fylde BC Corporate Plan Ribble Valley LSP South Ribble Community Strategy Pendle LSP Chorley BC Corporate Plan West Lancashire Community Strategy Lancaster Comm Strategy Burnley BC Corporate Plan Rossendale Community Strategy
Prop unfit private sector dwellings made fit/demolished AL 139 & AL 140 Lancaster Comm Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy Burnley BC Corporate Plan Decent Homes: No of homes meeting decent homes standard AL141 Elevate HMR Pathfinder Prosp. Wyre LSP % spend of Home Improvement Grant Budget in regen. areas AL 139 & AL 140 Pendle BC Corporate Plan Wyre BC % tenants satisfied with services provided by landlord Lancaster Comm Strategy Hyndburn BC Wyre BC Corporate Plan South Ribble Community Strategy Preston Community Strategy Preston Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Preston CC Corporate Plan Chorley Community Strategy West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy Burnley BC Corporate Plan Pendle Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Homelessness: Reduction in homelessness AL 144 South Ribble BC Corp Strategy No of new units of accommodation for use as temporary housing AL 144 Wyre BC Corporate Plan No of people sleeping rough on single night AL 144 Preston Community Strategy AL 144 West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Ribble Valley Community Strategy Pendle Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Waste : Fylde BC Corporate Plan Wyre BC LiL Survey 2003 Priority 5 % waste composted or recycled AL165 Lancaster CC Corporate Plan Ribble Valley DC LiL Panel Wave 8 Reduce amount of waster/head collected AL 165 Preston CC Corporate Plan LiL Panel Wave 10 Market recycled materials AL 165 Ribble Valley BC Corp Plan LiL Panel Wave 12 Landfill waste (reduced) AL 165 Lancaster Comm Strategy BVPI Satisfaction 2003/4 Wyre BC Corporate Plan Fylde Community Plan Preston Community Strategy South Ribble Corporate Strategy Chorley BC Corporate Plan West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Ribble Valley Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Children & Young Improved life chances for young people Teenage Pregnancy People Under 18 conception rate AL084 SHA Local Delivery Plan LiL Panel Wave 8 (inc repeat pregnancies and Preston Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy No of teenage mothers participating in AL071 Hyndburn Community Strategy education, employment or training *) Wyre BC Corporate Plan Lancaster Comm Strategy Wyre Community Plan Fylde Community Plan ECS Directorate Preston Community Strategy Pendle Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy
14 - 19 : AL065 & AL070 Preston Neighbourhood Wyre LSP LiL Survey 2003 Priority 11 % self employed and in business AL 001 & AL 008 Renewal Strategy Wyre BC KS4 attainment AL 091 ECS Directorate Hyndburn BC 19 plus NVQ level 2 AL 091 & Al 092 Wyre Community Strategy Rossendale LSP HE participation AL 092 Fylde Community Plan Pendle LSP Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire DC Corporate Plan West Lancashire CommunityStrategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Attainment % pupils achieving level 4 at KS 2 maths AL065 & AL070 Health Inequalities Framework Wyre LSP LiL Survey 2003 Priority 11 Preston Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Wyre BC Pendle Community Strategy Hyndburn BC Fylde Community Plan Rossendale LSP Rossendale Community Strategy Pendle LSP
Looked after children % looked after children: AL066 ECS Directorate attainment at KS 2 & 4 AL 066 Fylde Community Plan placements & adoptions AL 083 West Lancashire Community Strategy personal education plans AL 066 access to CAMHS
Community safety standard in schools AL067 & AL080 ECS Directorate Preston LSP LiL Survey 2003 Priority 2 (including Pis around healthy schools, behaviour, Lancaster Comm Strategy attainment,etc) Wyre BC Corporate Plan Wyre Community Plan Fylde Community Plan Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy West Lancashire DC Corporate Plan Pendle Community Strategy
Prevention of Youth offending AL 117 All CDRPs All Community Strategies West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Pendle Community Strategy
Healthy Communities Healthy lifestyles Leisure/culture: Increased use of leisure facs AL095 Hyndburn Neighbourhood Wyre LSP LiL Survey 2003 Priority 6 % satisfaction with cultural & leisure facilities AL 151 Renewal Strategy Wyre BC LiL Panel Wave 6 Fylde BC Corporate Plan Fylde BVPI Satisfaction 2003/4 Lancaster CC Corporate Plan Preston LSP West Lancs Corporate Plan South Ribble LSP Use of cultural facilities (museums, libraries) AL 148 Pendle BC Strategic Plan Pendle LSP LiL Panel Wave 6 South Ribble BC Corp Strategy Wyre BC Corporate Plan Lancaster Comm Strategy Fylde Community Plan Hyndburn Community Strategy Preston Community Strategy Preston Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Chorley Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy Lancaster Comm Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy Pendle Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Exercise: % pop undertaking 5 exercise sessions/wk AL095 Sport England Wyre LSP Pendle Community Strategy Fylde LSP No of people cycling to work AL 027 Rossendale Community Strategy Wyre BC No of people walking to work AL 027 Ribble Valley BC Lancaster LSP
Reduced obesity AL095 Preston Community Strategy LiL Survey 2003 Priority 12 % pop eating 5 a day AL 095 South Ribble LSP No of fruit & vegetable schemes in place rategy Lancaster Comm Strategy Pendle LSP Reduced substance misuse Smoking: No of people who stop smoking AL095 Preston Neighbourhood Lancaster LSP No of enclosed smoke free workspaces AL 095 Renewal Strategy Hyndburn BC No of convictions for sale of cigarettes to under age people AL 095 Wyre Community Plan No of deaths attributable to smoking AL 095 Fylde Community Strategy Preston Community Strategy
No of alcohol related admissions to A&E AL 095 Preston Community Strategy Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy
Drug prevention AL 118 ECS Directorate LiL Panel Wave 11 No of people accessing drug treatment AL 118 & AL 095 Preston Neighbourhood LiL Survey 2003 Priority 4 No of people reoffending after referral for drug treatment AL 118 & AL 095 Renewal Strategy District CDRPs Wyre Community Plan West Lancashire Community Strategy Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Reduced health inequalities Child health Infant mortality and life expectancy at birth AL094 & AL095 Futurebuilders Wyre LSP % mothers breastfeeding AL 094 & AL 095 Lancaster Comm Strategy Wyre BC No of children in nursery (Sure Start/Childrens Centres) AL 081 South Ribble Community Strategy Fylde LSP Child poverty? Chorley Community Strategy Lancaster LSP Hyndburn BC Corporate Plan Preston LSP Hyndburn & Ribble Valley PCT South Ribble LSP Pendle Community Strategy Pendle LSP Rossendale Community Strategy
Access to health services: AL 135 Wyre Community Plan Inpatient waiting time AL 135 Preston Community Strategy % patients with access to routine appt to see GP/PC Professional Chorley BC Corporate Plan West Lancashire Community Strategy Hyndburn & Ribble Valley PCT Ribble Valley Community Strategy
Mortality rates from major killer diseases: AL094 & AL096 Preston Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Wyre LSP Pendle Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Wyre BC No of people on CHD register AL 096 Health Inequalities Framework Fylde LSP Suicide Rates AL 094 South Ribble Community Strategy Lancaster LSP Preston Community Strategy Preston LSP Preston Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy South Ribble LSP Chorley Community Strategy Pendle LSP West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan West Lancashire Community Strategy Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Hyndburn & Ribble Valley PCT Pendle Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Dental health AL 097 PCT Delivery Plans No of people with decayed, filled or missing teeth AL 097 West Lancashire Community Strategy
Mental health: No of adults with mental health problems AL100 & AL101 Wyre Community Plan helped to live at home AL 101 Fylde Community Plan West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy Access rate to CAMHS LCC ECS Directorate
Improved natural environment Water quality Water quality against national standards AL161 & AL162 Lancaster Comm strategy Wyre BC LiL Survey 2003 Priority 5 Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy
Air quality Air quality against national standards AL161 Fylde Corporate Plan Wyre BC LiL Survey 2003 Priority 5 Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy
Promoting independence & well being of No. people with disability supported in own home AL099 & Al101 Wyre Community Plan LiL Survey 2003 Priority 10 people with disability Fylde Community Plan West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy
No. people with disability using direct payments AL099 & Al101
Waiting time for disabled facilities AL 101 Wyre BCCorporate Plan Ribble Valley Community Strategy Older People Promoting independence & well being of No. people over 65 using direct payments AL132 Social Services Directorate LiL Survey 2003 Priority 10 older people
No. people over 65 in very sheltered housing AL135 Social Services Directorate Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan
No of people over 65 receiving care in their own homes AL 135 & AL 136 Lancaster Comm Strategy Wyre BC Corporate Plan Fylde Community Plan South Ribble BC Corporate Plan West Lancashire Community Strategy West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy
Reduced A&E hospital admissions forover 65s AL135 Social Services Directorate Lancaster Comm Strategy
Decrease in no. of admissions of older AL144 Lancaster Comm Strategy people to perm. Residential/nursing care Wyre Community Plan Preston Community Strategy
Economic DevelopmentIncreased tourism No. of visitors AL006 Hyndburn BC Corporate Plan % value of tourism to local economy AL 006 Pendle BC Corporate Plan Visits to tourism centres AL 148 Ribble Valley BC Corp Plan Wyre BC Corporate Plan Lancaster Comm Strategy Wyre Community Plan Fylde Community Plan Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Employment & training opportunities Lifelong learning:
% NEET * AL012 Elevate HMR Pathfinder Prosp. Wyre LSP LiL Survey 2003 Priority 9 Fylde Community Plan Wyre BC & Priority 11 Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy LiL Panel Wave 10 Rossendale Community Strategy
No of people achieving basic skills level AL075 Elevate HMR Pathfinder Prosp. Rossendale LSP Adults enrolling on Adult Education courses AL 078 Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy
Employer specified learning places AL012 & AL075 Elevate HMR Pathfinder Prosp. Wyre LSP LiL Survey 2003 Priority 11 No of employers signed up to learning charter AL 078 Lancaster Comm Strategy Wyre BC Wyre Community Plan Fylde LSP Fylde Community Plan Rossendale LSP South Ribble Community Strategy Preston Community Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy
People into work : AL012 Elevate HMR Pathfinder Prosp. people on incapacity benefit AL012 Preston Community Strategy young people AL012 Preston Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy young mothers AL012 & AL084 West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan people with poor basic skills AL012 Hyndburn Community Strategy people with disabilities AL 101 Fylde Community Plan No of apprenticeships in public sector AL011 & AL075 Pendle Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy % unemployed
Job creation No of jobs: AL 001 Elevate HMR Pathfinder Prosp. Wyre LSP in manufacturing industries AL 001 Wyre Community Plan Wyre BC in service industries AL 001 Chorley Community Strategy in financial/high salary sector AL 001 Lancaster CC Corp Plan Fylde LSP in creative industries AL 146 Wyre BC Corporate Plan Chorley BC in retailing and distribution AL 001 Fylde Community Plan Ribble Valley LSP Fylde Corporate Plan Pendle LSP Average pay levels AL 001 South Ribble Community Strategy Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy Pendle Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Rossndale Community Strategy
No of Training sessions for elected members AL 108 Lancaster CC Corporate Plan Burnley BC Corporate Plan
Increased business sustainability Business start ups & survival rates AL008 & AL074 Pendle BC Corporate Plan Wyre LSP 11 districts were below England Lancaster Comm Strategy Wyre BC average in 2002/3 and 2003/4 Graduate new business start ups AL 008 Wyre Community Plan Chorley BC for National Floor Target 6 (New Social enterprise start ups AL 009 Fylde Corporate Plan Fylde LSP Firms Registration) Preston Community Strategy Ribble Valley LSP Chorley Community Strategy Pendle LSP West Lancashire Community Strategy West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy Pendle Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Pendle Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
Levels of vacant property in town centres AL014 Ribble Valley LSP
Broadband coverage AL022 Lancaster Comm Strategy West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Hyndburn Community Strategy Burnley BC Corporate Plan Rossendale Community Strategy
Increased inward investment Rate of development of business & AL014 & AL015 Pendle BC Corporate Plan industrial land Elevate HMR Pathfinder Prosp. Wyre Community Plan Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy Burnley BC Corporate Plan Pendle Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy Pendle Community Strategy Rossendale Community Strategy
% Gross Value Added (GVA) AL 004 South Ribble Community Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy
Use of Regional Investment Sites AL016 Sustainable transport Public transport Use of public transport AL020 & AL041 &AL131 Pendle BC Corporate Plan Lancaster LSP LiL Survey 2003 Wyre BC Corporate Plan Lancaster CC BVPI Satisfaction 2003/4 Lancaster Comm Strategy LiL Panel Wave 2 South Ribble Community Strategy LiL Panel Wave 4 Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan Ribble Valley Community Strategy
% new development within 400m of bus AL018 & AL019
Reliability of public transport AL020 & AL131 Pendle BC Corporate Plan Lancaster CC Availability of public transport Wyre Community Plan
Traffic Congestion: Reduction in traffic flows to/from town centres AL 029 Pendle BC Corporate Plan Lancaster CC LiL Survey 2003 Priority 3 No of ride and drive parking spaces AL 021 Wyre BC Corporate Plan No of incidents of illegal parking detected Fylde BC Corporate Plan South Ribble Community Strategy Preston Community Strategy Chorley BC Corporate Plan West Lancashire Community Strategy
No of cycle routes AL 027 Lancaster Community strategy Use of rail, cycling and walking networks AL 027 Lancaster CC Corporate Plan South Ribble Community Strategy Preston Community Strategy West Lancashire BC Corporate Plan West Lancashire Community Strategy Ribble Valley Community Strategy
Energy: Capacity for onshore renewable energy AL159 Wyre BC LiL Survey 2003 Priority 5 electrical generation AL159 Ribble Valley Community Strategy Renewable energy used in public buildings AL159 Lancaster Comm Strategy % homes energy efficient with SAP rating higher than 60 AL 158 Preston Community Strategy Chorley Community Strategy West Lancashire Community Strategy Hyndburn Community Strategy
% Biodiversity Action Plan targets achieved AL 173 Lancaster Comm Strategy
* Priority outcomes from Ambition Lancashire are derived from rigorous consultation with public and partners and are in part an aggregation of district community strategies *Areas of poor performance have been identified against national floor targets/national PSAs and BVPIs. There are areas of poor performance not listed including % ill health retirements, female top earners, employees with disability and employees from ethnic minorities (corporate health measures) NB: Many of the above priority outcomes may be subject to measurement of performance to address differing needs in terms of deprivation, rurality, demography, ethnicity or social inclusion.
ROBY MILL CONSERVATION AREA
DRAFT CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL
June 2005 Contents
Preface - Purpose of the appraisal 3
1 Introduction 4
2 Location and setting 4
3 Historical Evolution 7
4 Land Uses 9
5 Building Features 10
6 Pressures and Detracting features 18
7 Conclusions 20
8 Proposals 21
9 Appendix A - Principal effects of Conservation Area status and 25 Listed Building Control 10 Appendix B - Lancashire County Sites And Monuments Records 26
List of Plans
Plan 1 Current Conservation Area Boundary and Tree Preservation 6 Orders
Plan 2 1845 & 1892 Plans of Roby Mill 8
Plan 3 Plan showing Listed Buildings, other important buildings and 17 features
June 2005
Preface
This appraisal is part of a programme of The appraisals will also provide a basis for: appraisals of all the current and proposed reviewing conservation area boundaries; guiding conservation areas in West Lancashire. future local authority action in preparing enhancement schemes and in guiding the actions The District Council has an obligation under of others; and, where appropriate, increasing Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings planning controls. and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 to review, from time to time, its conservation area It is intended that these issues will be considered designations and consider any new areas, and in full consultation with local residents and under Section 71 of this Act, to formulate and landowners, local interest groups, the Parish publish proposals for the preservation and Council, the Conservation Areas Advisory Panel enhancement of these areas. and Lancashire County Council.
When West Lancashire’s existing Finally, this document will hopefully raise conservation areas were designated in the awareness of the special qualities of the 1970’s and 1980’s it was generally recognised Conservation Area so that as the area continues to that these areas were of a special character evolve, it does so in a sympathetic way and the which warranted preservation and essential character of the area is maintained for enhancement. However, very little was future generations. actually written down as to which features were important in this respect. English What is a Conservation Area? Heritage now recommend the carrying out of appraisals which will allow a full assessment A conservation area is an area of “special of the characteristics of existing and proposed architectural or historic interest”, the character of conservation areas. This will enable the which is considered worthy of protection and Council to decide whether the conservation improvement. It is the combination of the area still has sufficient character to warrant its buildings, street patterns, open spaces, vistas, designation or whether the area needs landmarks and other features which give a extending in any way. conservation area its distinctive character. This character should be the focus of efforts towards The appraisals will also highlight the preservation and enhancement. implications for the future preservation and enhancement of a conservation area. Under Planning Legislation the local authority has wider powers than usual to control development The policies on conservation areas contained which might damage the area’s character. The within the West Lancashire Local Plan form controls which exist in conservation areas are the basis for determining planning contained at the end of this document. applications for development in these areas. This appraisal should be read in conjunction It is important that there is a consensus on the with these policies and will form a material quality and importance of a particular consideration in the consideration of planning conservation area in order to assist in its applications and planning appeals. maintenance and enhancement. To be successful, conservation policy must be a partnership between West Lancashire District Council and the many interests involved in the conservation area’s future. Introduction
The Roby Mill Conservation Area was designated by West Lancashire District Council in 1975. The conservation area covers a substantial portion of the village, totalling 9.8 hectares, and is defined by development on either side of the minor road from Appley Bridge to Upholland. The area is characterised historically by the small groups of houses and former farmhouses dating from the early eighteenth to nineteenth centuries, with modern houses filling the spaces between. These groups formed three clusters; Bank Top around the junction of Roby Mill road with Ayrefield Lane, the junction of Roby Mill and Farley Lane, and the junction of Roby Mill with School Lane. The second two groups now form the continuous settlement of Roby Mill. Twentieth century development outside the conservation area has been restricted to mainly ribbon development along Roby Mill, Ayrefield Lane, Farley Lane and School Lane.
LOCATION AND SETTING
Location and Landscape Setting
Roby Mill is situated within a gently rolling landscape above the valley of the River Douglas at NGR SD 518 074 (centred), on the minor road running north from Upholland to Appley Bridge. Ormskirk is about 10.5km to the west and Skelmersdale 3km from to the south-west. The underlying solid geology of the area consists of Lower Westphalian, mainly productive, coal measures. These are generally well-covered by thick glacial and post-glacial deposits, primarily comprised of thick tills but with extensive Shirdley Hill sand deposits and coarse- textured fluvio-glacial deposits overlying till.
The settlement lies on the eastern side of a ridge, and the landscape is gently rolling. This ridge forms the eastern edge of the West Lancashire plain, and lies between the plain and the valley of the River Douglas. Roby Mill and Bank Top are situated on elevated ground at around a height of 80-90m aOD, with the land sloping sharply down to the River Douglas to the north. The countryside is quite well-wooded to the north and north-west, though the settlement lies close to the extensive urban areas of Skelmersdale, Upholland and Orrell to the south-west and south. Roby Mill lies within a lowland area of mixed arable and pasture farming comprising mainly improved pasture with arable fields. The field pattern is one of irregular ancient enclosures, but with some loss of field boundaries.
Important Views
Views within the Conservation Area are limited because of the nature of the ribbon development along the highway, and the winding character of the roads. The nature of the conservation area comprises two focal points of Roby Mill and Bank Top, with a strip of open land between the two areas. Views from the road are restricted by hedge boundaries, but this open land forms an important undeveloped area, and ensures that Roby Mill and Bank Top retain a sense of two separate settlements.
Within Roby Mill, other important open spaces include the land between the cemetery and Farley Lane, and a small field lying between the primary school and Roby Mill road. The cemetery too, is an important open space within the settlement.
Spectacular views out from the Conservation Area are seen from the strip of open land between the two settlements, uninterrupted views such as these should be maintained as they greatly contribute to the rural nature of the settlements.
HISTORICAL EVOLUTION
Origins
In the medieval period, Roby Mill and Bank Top lay within the township of Upholland, which was within the parish of Wigan. Very little is known of the early histories of these settlements, as they were very much secondary settlements on the northern periphery of the township. As the name implies, Roby Mill is likely to have developed around a corn mill, known to have been in existence by the reign of Elizabeth I, and which was probably established as a soke mill. In 1653-4 it was held by Lord Derby, who tenanted it to Henry Roby, who in turn sub-let it to William Rutter and Robert and Margaret Mawdsley. It appears to have been a manorial corn mill. At this time, the mill comprised a large barn, shippon, railed hay yard, a parcel of land, a kiln, and a grist mill, mill ponds, mill dams, watercourses, fishing and tolls for grinding corn. This was clearly a substantial holding, and tenants within the manor would have been obliged to have paid to have their corn ground at the mill. Other income would have been derived from the fishing rights and the kiln. It is likely that the kiln would have been multi-purpose. It would have served to dry grain before grinding in the mill. It may also have been used for malting barley for brewing, and it would probably have contained a bread oven for baking. The mill remained in use until well into the nineteenth century, when the miller appears to have lived adjacent to the mill. In 1824 Thomas Pye, corn miller and grocer had built, and was living at, 28 Roby Mill, which included a bakery.
Roby Mill and Bank Top in the post medieval period
It seems likely that both Roby Mill and Bank Top evolved as small industrial settlements. By the seventeenth century, mining and quarrying were established in the township, and workers in these industries lived there along with nail makers, linen-weavers, glovers, watchmakers and other craftsmen. Tan Pit Cottages at Bank Top indicate the presence of a tannery there. A tannery was often sited well away from the main areas of settlement because of the smells it produced. The location of the tannery is not known, however on the far side of the road, between Roby Mill road and Ayrefield Lane are two ponds. These may have originated through gravel extraction, but may also have been tan pits. Some of the cottages in Roby Mill would have been occupied by workers at local quarries and coal pits, and in 1841, the settlement included 45 quarry workers, or delfmen, and 14 colliers. There were also seven weavers. Farming was clearly a key occupation, as there were 21 farmers recorded, although it is likely that some of the quarry workers and colliers also farmed part time. The industrial nature of the settlement is reflected in the number of public houses. The Star, at Bank Top, was built in 1830, by the early nineteenth century there was also the King’s Head (also variously called the King William IV and the Bath Springs Hotel), the Fox Inn, and the Mill Stone Inn. In 1824, Mary Birch was recorded as a victualler at the King’s Head, and also a pipe maker, whilst Robert Marsh at the Fox Inn was also a stone quarry agent as well as a victualler.
Plan of 1845 Roby Mill
Plan of 1892 Roby Mill LAND USES
Most of the land and property within the conservation area has a predominantly residential use, in private ownership. Many of the houses are detached, semi- detached, or in short rows but are set fairly close to the road side, creating a sense of close development, though rural in nature. The area of densest development is at the junction of Farley Lane with Roby Mill road. Tan Pit Cottages are the exception, set well back from the road, with long front gardens, they form a long row of cottages at the northern end of the conservation area, but maintain the rural character of the area. In general, the houses provide the dominant aspect across the conservation area.
The rural aspect is strengthened by the dual centre of the conservation area, with Bank Top separated from Roby Mill by a stretch of undeveloped land, linked only by the road. The southern end of the conservation area, around the Fox Inn, is also slightly detached from the centre of Roby Mill, separated by an open field next to the school on one side, and the cemetery on the other.
Although documents show that this was once an industrial settlement, with a number of services, including grocers, bakers, smithy and cobbler, it no longer has a significant role as a service or shopping centre. Only two public houses; the Star in Bank Top and the Fox Inn in Roby Mill, are still in operation.
BUILDING FEATURES
Roby Mill is notable for the number of houses which date from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and which exhibit many features of historical and architectural interest. There are three concentrations of such buildings, at Bank Top, around Farley Lane and around the Fox Inn. These define the character of the conservation area, and that of the settlement in general. Twenty five of these buildings have been recognised as being of special architectural or historic interest and have been provided statutory protection as listed, all at grade II. These are detailed below, with summaries of the listed building descriptions. Additional comments are given in italics.
1 Roby Mill
A small house of mid-nineteenth century date, altered. Built of coursed squared sandstone in graduated courses, with a stone slate roof. It is of two storeys, single-fronted and double- depth. There is one large square window on each floor, with doorway to the right. Forms part of a group with numbers 3 to 11 Roby Mill.
3 Roby Mill
Small house dated 1725 on first floor. Built of coursed squared sandstone, with a composite tile roof. It has a transitional double-depth two-unit plan with a catslide roof to a single- storey rear. It has two low storeys and two windows to each storey, with doorway offset to the left. It forms a group with 1 and 5 to 11 Roby Mill. This, with number 1 Roby Mill, became the King’s Head public house in the early nineteenth century. By 1845 it was known as the King William IV, and it had become the Bath Springs Hotel by 1871.
5 and 7 Roby Mill
Pair of cottages of mid-nineteenth century date. Built of coursed squared sandstone with a slate roof. Both are double-depth in plan and single-fronted and of two storeys. Each has one window on each floor, with doorways to the left. Number 5 has a stone slab garden wall (pig stones) at the front, a rare survival in the area. They form a group with 1, 3, 9 and 11 Roby Mill.
9 and 11 Roby Mill
Pair of cottages of probably later eighteenth century date. Built of coursed squared sandstone with a composite tile roof. Both are double-depth in plan and single-fronted and of two low storeys. Each originally had one window on each floor, with doorways to the right. Number nine now incorporates the former lobby doorway and a window, with a second first-floor window inserted above. Both have twentieth-century wooden and glazed porches. They form a group with 1 to 7 Roby Mill.
Methodist Church, Roby Mill
Methodist Church dated 1860 on first floor, altered. Built of coursed squared sandstone with a slate roof, it is a rectangular building at right-angles to the road. It has a gabled two-window façade and is symmetrical with a round-headed doorway. The datestone above the door is inscribed JUBILEE / METHODIST CHURCH/1860/PREPARE TO MEET THY GOD O ISRAEL. The chapel was built by the Primitive Methodists in 1860 to replace a building which had been rented for 16 years. This chapel could seat 150 people, and it was built by members who worked in local quarries, and who furnished and dressed the stone.
18 and 20 Roby Mill
A pair of cottages now integrated with the Fox Inn to the left. Probably late eighteenth century, they have been altered and remodelled internally. They are built of coursed graduated sandstone rubble, with stone slate roofs. Formerly double-depth, both are single- fronted of two low storeys, with one window to each storey and doorways to the left.
The Fox Inn and attached former stable
Public house of probable later eighteenth century date, altered and internally extended into former stable. It is of painted roughcast, probably ober sandstone rubble, with a composition tile roof. It is of double-depth three unit plan with rear extensions. It has three windows to each storey, with a doorway to the first bay with reeded pilasters and semi-cilrcular canopy (now blocked internally). The small former stable to the rear is of sandstone rubble, of one bay and two storeys. This became the Fox Inn around 1812.
Roby Mill Church of England Primary School, School Lane
School built around 1870, altered and enlarged. Built of coursed, squared sandstone with red sandstone dressings, a slate roof with red cockscomb ridge tiles. The rectangular main range is at right-angles to the road, and set back from it, with a small wing to the front left, and a lean-to porch or narthex extended across the front from it. Tall, single-storey Gothic in style, with very steeply pitched roofs. The gabled façade has a large window of five stepped lancet lights under a two-centred relieving arch. This is reflected in the gabled façade of the porch, which has three stepped lancet lights under a two-centred relieving arch. Built as a National School.
36 Roby Mill
A small house dated 1812 at the first floor, altered. It is of sandstone semi-coursed rubble, with a stone slate roof. It is of double-depth, double-fronted plan, of two storeys and symmetrical with two mullioned windows to each storey. It has a plain central doorway. Datestone reads E/JH/1812. Forms a group with 38 to 42 Roby Mill. This was the Mill Stone Inn.
38, 40 and 42 Roby Mill
A row of three cottages, probably dating to the mid- to later eighteenth century, altered. Built of coursed squared sandstone, with composition tile roof. Numbers 38 and 40 are double- depth, whilst 42 is almost triangular in plan. All are single-fronted, of two low storeys, with doorways to the left. They form a group with 36 Roby Mill.
Knight’s House, Roby Mill
Former farmhouse, now house, dated 1716 at the first floor, but containing fabric which suggests a remodelling of a much earlier building. Remodelled again in the later nineteenth century, and altered. Built of coursed, squared sandstone rubble, with rock-faced stone in the wings, with a concrete-tile roof. It is of irregular plan, with a one-and-a-half depth main range, a set-back single-depth side wing to the left and a set-back double-depth side wing to the right. The three-window main range has a chamfered plinth and a broad band over each floor, a doorway to the left and a square moulded datestone reading 1716/EK/PK. The interior has a timber-framed partition wall between the main range and south wing, two moulded axial beams in the main room, two crudely chamfered lateral beams in the room above. It is thought to have originated as a timber-framed building extending to the south.
Bank Top House, 55 Roby Mill
House, probably dating to the early nineteenth century, altered. Built of coursed squared sandstone, with a composition tile roof, it has a double-depth and double-fronted main range with a rear wing to the right-hand half. It is of two storeys with attic, symmetrical with five windows to the first floor, above a central doorway with moulded architrave and shallow cornice. The interior is said to have a doglegged staircase with elaborate wrought-iron balusters.
Tan Pit Cottages, 59-73 Roby Mill
A row of eight small cottages set back from the road, now forming six dwellings. Probably of early to mid-eighteenth century date, and apparently of different builds, with alterations and additons to both ends. They are built of sandstone with composition tile roofs, of two low storeys, with one window on each and plain doorways to the left. Double-depth in plan, each cottage is single-fronted, though numbers 67 and 69, and 71 and 73 have been combined into single dwellings. Number 67/69 has two large kingpost roof trusses. A date of around 1650 has been given for these cottages (I Abram, ‘The ballad singer: a short list of Roby Mill’ 1985).
Important Unlisted Buildings
In addition to the high number of listed buildings within the Conservation Area, there are many other buildings of historic interest which add to the character of the area and its attractive appearance. These buildings have no statutory protection and are most at risk from harmful alterations, and in some cases have already been subject to substantial changes.
8 to 16 Roby Mill
A row of five cottages of different builds. All are two storey, double-depth and single- fronted, with one window to each storey and a doorway, except for number 8. This end cottage is a later additon, post-dating the 1892 Ordnance Survey map. It has two windows above one window and a doorway. All are built of squared, coursed sandstone, that to number 8 being slightly rock-faced.
28 and 30 Roby Mill
Squared, coursed sandstone-built detached cottages, of early nineteenth century date. Number 28 was built around 1823 by Thomas Pye, the corn miller and grocer. This became a bakery by the end of the nineteenth century, with accommodation. Number 30 Roby Mill has a datestone of 1790, and was two dwellings in the nineteenth century. In the early part of the nineteenth century, the miller lived in one of the cottages.
Stone Cottage
Stone Cottage is situated on the corner of the junction of Farley Lane and Roby Mill. It is a double fronted detached property of coursed squared sandstone and composition tile roof. L- shaped in plan this property has a later extension to the south. Constructed of similar materials and building style of No.s 38, 40 and 42 and forms a group with these buildings around the junction.
Methodist school chapel
The 1860 Methodist church had become too small by the early twentieth century, and in 1929 an acre of land was bought on the opposite side of the road. In 1937, a new Sunday school, built of Ravenhead rustic brick was opened on the site, able to accommodate up to 300 people.
Knights Farm
Several of the structures at Knights Farm are attractive stone buildings and positively contribute to the area.
46 – 50 Roby Mill
Another group of stone built cottages fronting onto the road associated with a small stone barn with a stone slate roof, with its gable end fronting onto the road. No. 50 is double fronted with a modern porch in matching materials.
All Hallows School
All Hallows School was opened in 1875 as a Roman Catholic school by Father Doon. IT is set back from the road behind the buildings above but can be viewed down the entrance way. This became the centre of Roman Catholic activity in the village. A catering company currently uses it as commercial premises. Constructed of semi-coursed roughly squared sandstone with a grey slate roof, it retains its cast iron guttering in places. A small porch with arched doorway exists on the south side of the building. Modern extensions have been added to the northern part.
52 and 54 Roby Mill
These are two 1930’s semi-detached houses. No. 52 has been much altered but has some remnants of original detailing, such as the corbel decorative detail to the eaves originally supporting the guttering, which runs across both properties.
Whittles Farm
This property is currently being restored and is of coursed squared sandstone, with a porch and a modern extension to the rear.
Barn to north of 55 Roby Mill
A small structure is situated to the north of 55 Roby Mill, a listed building and within its curtilage. It appears to be a small stone barn which is now in use as a garage.
Star Inn
The Star Inn is a coursed sandstone public house, built in 1830, and serving the community of Bank Top. The building of 1830 has clearly been altered in the late nineteenth century.
57 Roby Mill
Detached coursed sandstone structure with mixed grey slate / composite tiled roof set back from road in manner of the terraced cottages to the north.
Mellings, 66 Roby Mill and Hilltop Cottage
At the north end of Bank Top, is a detached house called Mellings, a former farmhouse at 66 Roby Mill, with adjacent detached barn and another detached house called Hilltop Cottage. Built of coursed sandstone rubble, it appears that 66 and the barn and Hilltop Cottage were in existence by 1845. The barn has recently been converted to residential accommodation. Mellings was built between 1845 and 1892 as it appears named on the 1892 map. They form an attractive group at the top of the road as it descends into the valley to the north.
Other Important Features
The corn mill, which gave Roby Mill its name, was demolished in the early twentieth century. The mill pond, which fed the mill was still in existence at the end of the nineteenth century, but following the demolition of the mill it was no longer maintained and had become an area of marshy ground in the early twentieth century. The site of the pond, on the west side of the road, opposite the site of the mill (now occupied by a bungalow at 32 Roby Mill), still survives as a low-lying area of marshy ground. This area is not accessible to the public, but is an important element of the settlement’s history and development.
On the roadside next to the former mill pond is a K6 type telephone kiosk, designed by Sir Gilbert Scott in 1935, and listed grade II. Cast iron, it is a square kiosk with a domed roof. Another K6 is located in the grounds of 30 Roby Mill, used as a garden ornament and not in situ.
On the farm side of Ayrefield Road from The Star public House, and next to 66 Roby Mill, are two ponds, which were in existence by 1845. These may be the result of quarrying for gravel, as a gravel pit was marked nearby on the Ordnance Survey map of 1849, though their proximity to Tan Pit cottages suggests that they may be related to a former tannery. Although apparently in private ownership, these ponds form a significant open space at the north end of the conservation area.
A pair of gate piers to Knight’s House, probably dating to the early eighteenth century. Built of sandstone ashlar in a classical style, each with a moulded plinth, prominent moulded cornice and urn finial with gadrooning. They form a group with Knight’s House, also listed grade II.
The pig stone wall at 5 Roby Mill has been mentioned above. Pig stones also survive at 40 and 48 Roby Mill and are important reminders of a lost way of life, while adding to the character of the area.
There are a considerable amount and variety of boundary walls in and around the conservation area. These stone walls have become indicative of the type of boundary edging in the area. They are often punctuated by stone gate posts, providing further character and diversity.
The main, publicly accessible open space within the conservation area is the cemetery to the south of the former mill pond. It is set back from the road, and separated from it by a car parking area. This is fronted by a low stone wall, and the entrance to the car parking area and the cemetery at the north end is flanked by two stone gate piers. The southern entrance to the car park is an informal opening marked, with a signpost stating ‘St Teresa’s Cemetery, Roby Mill Upholland’. The small field west of the Church of England School, at the junction of School Lane with Roby Mill, is also aesthetically an important open space but it does not appear that it is publicly accessible. Apart from a wooden crucifix that has been erected in the centre the field is empty of features.
PRESSURES AND DETRACTING FEATURES
The Council has a duty to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area. The effect on the character or appearance of the area has to be considered in all development. Policies CA.1 to CA.6 in the West Lancashire Local Plan (and Policy EN4 of the Deposit Draft Replacement Local Plan) provide the basis on which the Council will consider all development in the conservation area.
However protecting the special character of the area cannot be carried out in isolation. A substantial amount of the changes, both to buildings and the surrounding land and natural features does not come under the control of the Local Authority. Minor changes, may appear small seen in isolation but the cumulative effect can, over time, harm the special character of the area. The long term future of the Roby Mill Conservation Area relies a great deal on the sustainable and sensitive approach of the residents who live in the area.
Roby Mill has a high percentage of buildings, within its historic core, surviving from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, including some with datestones. It seems likely, given the evidence for timber framing at Knight’s House, that at least some early buildings in Roby Mill would have been timber-framed, probably with thatched roofs. Even though Roby Mill lies in an area of plentiful stone supplies, timber and thatch would have provided a cheaper source of building materials and been used for some buildings until well into the eighteenth century. As Roby Mill expanded with the growth of the quarrying industry, this would have led to cheaper supplies of building stone, and timber frames would have been replaced with sandstone, and thatch with stone slates. This industrial base thus created a typical industrial hamlet by the early nineteenth century, served by the chapel and a number of inns. In general, the settlement has retained the character of a typical small Lancashire industrial settlement, even though quarrying ceased many years ago.
The decline of coal mining in the nineteenth century, and the limited growth of quarrying, restricted Roby Mill’s expansion. It is only in the twentieth century that there has been further expansion of the settlement, with a small number of houses built at the north and south end of Roby Mill itself, and along the road at Bank Top. In the early twentieth century, terraced houses were built outside the area covered by the conservation area, to the south of Roby Mill and along Ayrefield Lane, but more modern development of mainly individually built detached houses has taken place along Roby Mill road between the two settlements. Roby Mill and Bank Top are still two distinct settlements, but pressure for new development may lead to a continuous ribbon development along the road. New development could also destroy the important views out of the area to be seen from the open area between Roby Mill and Bank Top.
There is a high potential for surviving above ground remains, from the eighteenth to nineteenth centuries. Although the stock of historic buildings is relatively high, as shown by the large number of listed buildings, there has been some diminution of the value of the historic fabric through over restoration and unsympathetic house improvements.
The few open spaces within the area are underused and are perhaps not contributing as fully as they might to the character of the conservation area. In addition the car park at the cemetery does not enhance one of the few public open spaces in the area.
The lighting columns are a mixture of concrete and grey metal columns, which do not enhance the character of the area. An alternative design would be more appropriate.
The footpath surfaces in many parts of the Conservation Area are worn and patched creating a mottled effect. This does not enhance the appearance of a well maintained and good quality environment.
The loss of traditional features and materials such as the pig stone boundaries, stone slate roofs, windows and rainwater goods has occurred as these features have been replaced with modern equivalents. This is particularly obvious where many of the houses have been ‘restored’. The stone boundary walls and associated gate posts in and around the area have been highlighted above as important features. Their replacement with inappropriate boundary materials would be detrimental to the character of the area. Some stone boundary / field walls are in poor repair.
CONCLUSIONS
A conservation area is defined as “an area of special architectural or historic interest, the character of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance”. This appraisal clearly demonstrates that the Roby Mill Conservation Area contains both architectural and historic interest which continues to justify its conservation area status.
This appraisal provides an opportunity to highlight some of the important features and buildings in Roby Mill Conservation Area, as well as promoting a better understanding of the issues which specifically relate to the area as a way of retaining the area’s special character or appearance.
Many individual properties are of significant value within the local context and have been highlighted as making a significant contribution to the special character of the area.
The settlement of Roby Mill clearly contains features of both historical and architectural interest, which justifies part of the settlement’s status as a conservation area. Many of the individual buildings within the conservation area have statutory protection as grade II listed buildings, which also indicates that many of the buildings are of at least local importance. The listed buildings are concentrated around the site of the former corn mill, which provides a cohesive impression of a post medieval rural settlement comprising mostly stone-built vernacular-style buildings, with some classically influenced features. The northern end of the conservation area, at Bank Top is less cohesive in style, with a number of modern houses around the historic core of Tan Pit cottages and The Star public house. The open areas between the settlement clusters is an important part of the rural character, with the ponds at Bank Top, the former mill pond and the cemetery forming important open spaces within the settlement
The conservation area covers all the historic core of the settlement. Other historic areas, such as Walthew Green, are quite distinct from Roby Mill and Bank Top, and are separated from them by modern development and open countryside. ROBY MILL CONSERVATION AREA PROPOSALS
It is the duty of the local planning authority to determine whether the existing boundary of the conservation area is still appropriate and whether any further parts should be designated as a conservation area or indeed deleted from it.
The local planning authority must also from time to time formulate and publish proposals for the preservation and enhancement of conservation areas. Any enhancement proposals formulated, under this section, will be submitted for further public consideration.
This appraisal document has raised several issues which should form part of any proposed action and be considered alongside policies for the area as set out in the West Lancashire Local Plan.
In common with other conservation area appraisals produced by the local authority, the following issues have been recognised for consideration in respect of Roby Mill Conservation Area:
• whether the existing conservation area boundary is appropriate • whether it is necessary to sanction additional controls over development in the form of the imposition of an Article 4 (2) direction • to look at further development in the conservation area • to assess the need for environmental improvements in the conservation area
The Conservation Area Boundary
Following a full assessment of the area, it is recognised that the Roby Mill Conservation Area still retains a special character which is well defined and worthy of protection and designation as a conservation area.
As part of this review, the historic buildings which form part of the settlement of Roby Mill and Bank Top were assessed. It was clear that the current boundaries of the conservation area includes all the key buildings of architectural and historic interest.
It is thus recommended that the boundary of the conservation area is retained unchanged.
Article 4 Direction
There is currently no Article 4 Direction in place at Roby Mill and owners within the Roby Mill Conservation Area can currently carry out certain small alterations to their residential properties such as replacing windows and doors and partially removing boundary walls for example without needing planning permission.
An Article 4(2) Direction allows the Council to remove some of these permitted development rights available to residents meaning that planning permission would then be required for such work albeit only on those elevations which front a highway. An Article 4(2) Direction would apply to domestic properties and could be used to control; • Works to change windows and doors • Alterations to roofs • Porches • Laying of hardstanding for vehicles • The partial demolition of walls • The erection of walls, gates and fences.
Properties that are not houses do not benefit from the same permitted development rights, and planning permission is required for any works that would materially affect the appearance of a building.
However, it has been noted that some areas of the Conservation Area are vulnerable to inappropriate development and alteration. In particular, small terraced cottages can often loose their unifying appearance and properties undergoing ‘restoration’ can often be ‘over restored’ or undergo alterations which overtime erode the special character and appearance of the street frontage. Even some of the houses from the later periods that may have distinctive character features have been altered in some way.
After careful consideration the Council considers that the application of an Article 4(2) Direction within the Roby Mill Conservation Area would be an important ‘tool’ in restricting the permitted development rights of property owners and could result in a reduction of minor, uncontrolled development within the Area. It is proposed that the Direction would be applied across the whole of the Conservation Area.
Further Development in the Conservation Area
The conservation area contains some areas of open land which may become subject to development pressures, particularly between Roby Mill and Bank Top. This is a key feature of Roby Mill Conservation Area’s rural character. New development would have to be considered very carefully if it is not to compromise the character of the area.
Works to Trees in Conservation Areas
Most trees in conservation areas are subject to controls which exist to protect this special character. If a tree is not protected by a Preservation Order (TPO), but is within the conservation area, 6 weeks notice must be given in writing to the District Council of an intention to carry out works to trees (pruning or felling) or any root systems. This is often difficult to monitor on private land that covers such a large area. Existing protected trees and woodland lie within the boundary of the conservation area in the Bank Top area with other areas of woodland close to the boundary of the settlement, along School Lane also being protected. The existing Tree Preservation Orders in the area are shown within the full appraisal document.
Work is currently on-going to review the Districts protected woodland and the trees within Roby Mill and immediate surroundings will be re-surveyed as part of that process.
The Council is keen to promote good tree management within the conservation area and the Council’s Aboricultural Officer offers advice to owners both indirectly through leaflets and directly with specialist advice. It is important to ensure that the replacement of protected trees and woodland are provided to ensure continuity of tree cover within the area.
Environmental Improvements in the Conservation Area
The Appraisal identifies several detracting features within the conservation area. Some of these features, and the action required to remedy the situation, are set out below:
Detracting Features Action Required Implementation
The cumulative effect of minor Better understanding of The appraisal should become alterations and extensions (inc. architectural designs and the wider adopted by the Council as SPG demolition to buildings, which conservation area and better and be used by Development affect the character and erode control and enforcement where Control. the special character and necessary, appearance of the area.
Loss of the historic character. Help and guidance to owners to Through advice from the help them make the best informed Conservation Unit. decisions relating to alterations.
Inappropriate additions and Help and guidance to owners to Through advice from the unsympathetic improvements. help them make the best informed Conservation Unit decisions relating to alterations. Consult with the local Raising the awareness of the community regarding the controls, which exist on listed implementation of an Article 4 buildings and in the conservation Direction area. Adoption of the Appraisal as SPG
Loss of character and historic Help and guidance for owners with Consider grant scheme for features due to neglect, ‘over the repair and replacement of repair / reinstatement of restoration’ or lack of traditional features traditional features, if funding understanding becomes available, especially for those buildings and features that have been identified as important
Modern lighting columns Replacement with sympathetic Local Authority action in lighting columns conjunction with LCC for replacement, if funding becomes available
Poor quality footpaths Replacement / resurfacing of Local Authority to seek footpaths where appropriate to do commitment from LCC for so. better repair/replacement regime to be implemented. Investigate partnership scheme if funding becomes available.
Appearance of the cemetery Consider an enhancement scheme Community consultation r.e. car park. to improve their appearances. potential schemes
Use and appearance of field / Consider additional appropriate Provision of advice in relation land to west of C of E school use of these spaces to landscape enhancement, public art or similar schemes. Involvement of residents and public Consider a funding scheme from the District Council and Parish Council if funds become available.
Summary
The Roby Mill Conservation Area is an area of architectural and historic interest, encompassing the whole of the post medieval industrial settlement. Whilst the dual settlements of Roby Mill and Bank Top still retain much of their historic character and value there are still opportunities for enhancement and environmental improvement. This must be undertaken by all interested parties working together in partnership. This will encourage local residents and visitors to take pride in the village and thereby contribute to its upkeep and enhancement. APPENDIX A
PRINCIPAL EFFECTS OF CONSERVATION AREA DESIGNATION
By designating a conservation area the Council is confirming that it regards the area as a place where special care should be taken to maintain and improve its visual character. This means that change in a conservation area is subject to greater control than elsewhere, principally:
1. Special attention shall be paid in the exercise of planning functions to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of a conservation area.
2. Conservation Area Consent is required from the Council for the demolition (with some exceptions) of buildings and walls.
3. The Council must be given six weeks notice of any proposal to carry out any work to any tree within the area.
4. Permitted Development Rights (i.e. those building works which do not require planning permission) were removed in Roby Mill by the Council in 19??. The Article 4(1) Direction limits what work you can carry out, to your property, without first applying for planning permission. The restrictions relate to the following aspects of development within the conservation area:
- the enlargement or extension of dwellings including the erection of detached buildings such as garages or stables within the curtilage of the property; - the cladding of the exterior with stone, artificial stone, timber, plastic or tiles; - the erection of any new buildings such as garden sheds with a cubic content greater than 10 cubic metres; - the enlargement of the dwelling by adding to or altering its roof; - the erection of porches outside any external door of the property; - the construction or laying down of hardstanding for vehicles; - the provision of gates, fences, walls or other means of enclosure.
[The legislation relating to permitted Development Rights is complicated and could be subject to change. It is, therefore, advisable to check with the planning authority before carrying out any building works].
PRINCIPAL EFFECTS OF LISTED BUILDING CONTROL
The statutory list of buildings of architectural or historic interest is compiled by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, and includes a wide variety of structures. Inclusion of a building on the list identifies that building as having special interest and brings any alterations to that building under planning control.
There is a general presumption in favour of the preservation of listed buildings because they represent a finite resource. Controls apply to the whole building, both internal and external and to all works which would affect a building’s character. Works of basic maintenance are exempt from control - on a like for like basis, unless there is an element of alteration or rebuilding.
It is a criminal offence to carry out unauthorised alterations to a listed building, so it is always best to consult with the Local Authority to determine whether consent for work to a building is required.
APPENDIX B
LANCASHIRE COUNTY SITES AND MONUMENTS RECORDS
The following features mentioned in the text are recorded as sites of archaeological interest on the Lancashire County Sites and Monuments Record:
1 Roby Mill (PRN 18711) 3 Roby Mill (PRN 18712) 5-7 Roby Mill (PRN 18713) 9-11 Roby Mill (PRN 18714) Methodist Church (PRN 18725) 18-20 Roby Mill (PRN 18715) Fox Inn (PRN 9566) C of E Primary School (PRN 18736) 36 Roby Mill (PRN 18716) 38-42 Roby Mill (PRN 18717) Knight’s House (PRN 18721) 55 Roby Mill (PRN 18718) 59-73 Roby Mill (PRN 18719)
Roby Mill Dam (PRN 9563) K6 Telephone kiosk (PRN 18720) Gate Piers to Knight’s House (PRN 18722)
Proposals affecting the above sites may therefore meet with a comment from the Lancashire County Archaeology Service, but this will depend on the nature and extent of the proposals.
HALSALL CONSERVATION AREA
qqq
DRAFT CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL
July 2005 Contents
Preface - Purpose of the appraisal 3
1 Introduction 4
2 Location and setting 4
3 Historical Evolution 7
4 Land uses 11
5 Building Features 12
6 Pressures and Detracting features 19
7 Conclusions 20
8 Proposals 21
9 Appendix A - Principal effects of Conservation Area status and 26 Listed Building Control 10 Appendix B – Lancashire County Sites and Monuments Records 27
List of Plans
Plan 1 Current Conservation Area boundary and protected trees (TPO’s) 6
Plan 2 1893 Plan of Halsall 10
Plan 3 Plan showing Listed Buildings and other important buildings. 18
Plan 4 Proposed extension to Conservation Area and Article 4(2) 22 Direction.
July 2005 Preface
This appraisal is part of a programme of The appraisals will also provide a basis for: appraisals of all the current and proposed reviewing conservation area boundaries; guiding conservation areas in West Lancashire. future local authority action in preparing enhancement schemes and in guiding the actions The District Council has an obligation under of others; and, where appropriate, increasing Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings planning controls. and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 to review, from time to time, its conservation area It is intended that these issues will be considered designations and consider any new areas, and in full consultation with local residents and under Section 71 of this Act, to formulate and landowners, local interest groups, the Parish publish proposals for the preservation and Council, the Conservation Areas Advisory Panel enhancement of these areas. and Lancashire County Council.
When West Lancashire’s existing Finally, this document will hopefully raise conservation areas were designated in the awareness of the special qualities of the 1970’s and 1980’s it was generally recognised Conservation Area so that as the area continues to that these areas were of a special character evolve, it does so in a sympathetic way and the which warranted preservation and essential character of the area is maintained for enhancement. However, very little was future generations. actually written down as to which features were important in this respect. English What is a Conservation Area? Heritage now recommend the carrying out of appraisals which will allow a full assessment A conservation area is an area of “special of the characteristics of existing and proposed architectural or historic interest”, the character of conservation areas. This will enable the which is considered worthy of protection and Council to decide whether the conservation improvement. It is the combination of the area still has sufficient character to warrant its buildings, street patterns, open spaces, vistas, designation or whether the area needs landmarks and other features which give a extending in any way. conservation area its distinctive character. This character should be the focus of efforts towards The appraisals will also highlight the preservation and enhancement. implications for the future preservation and enhancement of a conservation area. Under Planning Legislation the local authority has wider powers than usual to control development The policies on conservation areas contained which might damage the area’s character. The within the West Lancashire Local Plan form controls which exist in conservation areas are the basis for determining planning contained at the end of this document. applications for development in these areas. This appraisal should be read in conjunction It is important that there is a consensus on the with these policies and will form a material quality and importance of a particular consideration in the consideration of planning conservation area in order to assist in its applications and planning appeals. maintenance and enhancement. To be successful, conservation policy must be a partnership between West Lancashire District Council and the many interests involved in the conservation area’s future. INTRODUCTION
The Halsall Conservation Area was designated by West Lancashire District Council in July 1975 and was last reviewed in 1985. The conservation area covers a substantial portion of the village, totalling just over 27 hectares, and is defined by development along the A5147. The area is centred on two separate areas. The northern centre is focused on the church, the war memorial and the former Halsall Arms public house at its junction with Summerwood Lane. The southern is focused on the school, Halsall Hall and houses around the junction of Carr Moss Lane Road with the A5147. Between these two areas, the conservation area runs in a narrow strip, encompassing the main road and open land on either side. North of the church, the conservation area includes areas on both sides of the main road, including a few detached houses and the extensive grounds of Halsall House. The northern edge is at Malt Kiln House, where Gregory Lane joins the main road.
LOCATION AND SETTING
Location and Landscape Setting
Halsall is situated on the A5147 road to Southport from Maghull at NGR SD 370 103 (centred). It is situated around 5km from Ormskirk to the east and around 7.5km from Southport to the west. The underlying solid geology of the area consists of New Red Sandstone, specifically Permian and Triassic sandstones, and sandstone was commonly used in local buildings. Soils comprise a rich loam, overlying clays. The village lies on a low sandstone ridge within the area of the former Halsall Moss, and before the mosses were drained, the habitable area was marked approximately by the 8m contour. This slightly higher land is likely to have attracted settlement from the prehistoric period, and would have provided easy access to the rich resources of the extensive wetlands. The wetlands began to be drained from the medieval period, by the monks of Burscough Abbey. Drainage was carried out on a piecemeal basis, and was not completed until around 1750.
The landscape around the village is very gently undulating with Halsall situated on slightly elevated ground at a height of around 15-17m aOD. The surrounding landscape is dominated by large and irregular fields, bounded with some hedgerows, hedgerow banks and drainage ditches. In general there is little woodland in the area, and trees, generally, are relatively scarce, though there are some in hedgerows. This may be the result of the open landscape, which leaves it liable to the effects of salt-laden winds. Main roads meander through the landscape, probably reflecting the early date at which much of this landscape was drained. The area has long been dominated by arable agriculture, but with some pasture ad fields given over to osier beds.
Important Views
Views within the Conservation Area are limited because of the low-lying nature of the surrounding landscape. The development of Halsall along the A5147 means that this main road forms the principal viewpoint, along the length of the conservation area, and forms a dominating feature. Although there are two centres in the conservation area, only the northern one, around the church and war memorial, forms a distinct focal point. Halsall Hall and Halsall Manor Court provides a important development in the southern section of the village.
The wooded nature of the land on both sides of the road to the west and north of the church provides an enclosed vista along the road, but restricts wider views. Both Halsall House, and its extensive grounds containing the remains of Halsall Rectory, are largely hidden from view by woodland.
The rural and open nature of the surrounding landscape is typical and the farmland impedes on the character of the conservation area dominating views especially when viewing from New Street north-west between Halsall Hall and The Runnel and south-east moving out of the village along the A5147.
More distinct views of the St Cuthbert’s Church and in particular its tower are attained from the flat farm land surrounding the village.
HISTORICAL EVOLUTION
Origins
Halsall is first documented in the Domesday Book in 1086 as Heleshale, which means rising ground on the edge of a great moss. It has belonged to the estate of Chetel at the time of the Conquest, but was then granted to Pain de Viliers the lord of Warrington. In 1212, Robert de Viliers gave some land to Cockersands Abbey, and the manor of Halsall to Alan, son of Simon, a local family which soon took on the name de Halsall, or de Lydiate, and which remained in the area until 1625. At this date, the manor was sold to Sir Charles Gerard, who was one of the few lords of the manor to actually live in Halsall. The manorial centre was Halsall Hall, and Sir Charles built a water mill and windmill close by. At his death in 1640, he was buried in the village. The lords of the manor continued to live elsewhere until the estate passed to Charles Mordaunt in the eighteenth century.
Church
The church forms the central focal point for the conservation area, situated on the north side of the junction of the main road with Summerwood Lane, which forms a small triangular open area. The date of origin of the first church is not known, but its dedication is to St Cuthbert, an English saint who is often thought to denote a pre-Conquest foundation. The present building, however, is based on a Norman structure, fragments of which survive in the lower courses of the north-west angle of the nave. It is thought that this would have been the west end of the Norman church. The church appears to have been substantially altered and enlarged at the end of the thirteenth century, with the addition of a north aisle, chapels, tower and spire. In the mid-fourteenth century, a south aisle was added, the roof raised and the tower rebuilt at the west end. This was followed around 1370 by the addition of a chancel.
The chancel was restored in 1873, and again in 1886, when there was a more general restoration. Most of the exterior now dates to this period. The choir vestry was once the grammar school, a two-storey building, with the schoolmaster’s accommodation upstairs. This school was founded by Edward Halsall in 1593, commemorated by an inscription over a now-blocked doorway in the east wall.
Halsall Rectory
To the north east of the church was the Rectory, which is thought to date from the fourteenth century, but which is first documented in 1563. By 1660, it had a hall, great parlour, larder, brewhouse, dairy, kitchen and study. These rooms are thought to have ranged around a courtyard with a gatehouse. It also had three tithe barns, probably the result of the church and Rectory serving a large area and a number of townships, comprising Downholland, Halsall, Lydiate, Maghull and Melling. This building was demolished in the nineteenth century, and replaced by the new rectory, now known as Halsall House, built by Sydney Smirke for the Blundell family in 1847-50. A ha-ha was built in the grounds to the south of the house in 1850. After Canon Blundell ceased to be Rector, a third Rectory was built in its own grounds on the west side of the main road.
Village
The original focal point of the settlement was the church and the village green, where the village cross was located. Only the base of the medieval cross survives, incorporated into the war memorial, and situated at the junction of Summerwood Lane and the main road, to the south of the church. The original cross, and the village green, stood on the north side of the church, where Summerwood Lane originally ran. This route was altered to run to the south- east of the church sometime in the second half of the nineteenth century, and the village green was incorporated into the ground of the Rectory. A tithe barn was situated on the north side of the road, close to where Summerwood Lane now turns to the south of the church. This barn housed the school after it moved from the church in 1861, and later the church hall. This, and the nearby Hearse House, have been demolished and replaced by modern houses. Numbers 3a (the Post Office), 8, 10 and 12 Summerwood Lane, as well as Glebe Farm, are the only surviving older houses in this area. Number 8 was the Cocoa Rooms, and later the District Bank. Both this house, and number 10, were built following the rerouting of Summerwood Lane. Opposite the war memorial is the former Scarisbrick Arms, a public house which originated as a private dwelling. It became a public house in the early nineteenth century, and was first licensed in 1828. It later became the Halsall Arms. The building was altered in the late nineteenth or early twentieth century.
The second focus point in the village is to the south, at the junction of the main road with Carr Moss Lane, and area known as Little Hall Green. The main building in this area is Halsall Hall (see below), and the rest of the area appears to have developed mainly in the early nineteenth century. Opposite Halsall Hall is the primary school, begun in 1904, and opened to pupils in 1907, succeeding the old Grammar School.
Halsall Hall
The origins and form of the original hall is not known, but following the passing of the manor to Charles Mordaunt, he had Halsall Hall rebuilt in a more fashionable style. This is thought to date to around 1769, when his initials were put on a lead downspout. A new west wing was built, with a Venetian window, and a great entertainment room was added with bedrooms above. He also established a cotton mill at the hall on the stream below the house in 1779, which employed 160 poor women and children. Part of the mill, which probably carried out both spinning and weaving, appears to have been established within Halsall Hall itself, as within the cellars were rock-cut water tanks, probably for textile processing. The mill was water-powered, but a steam engine was later installed to supplement water power. The hall was later adapted to accommodate the mill workers.
The hall and its outbuildings have now been converted to flats. It is brick-built, on sandstone foundations, with sandstone mullioned windows, quoins, door dressings and string course. The roof is covered in limestone flags. It is possible that this redesigned manorial hall was purpose-built to accommodate both the family, its staff, and the cotton mill.
Plan of 1893 Halsall
LAND USES
Although most of the land and property within the Conservation Area has a predominantly residential use, in private ownership, the character of the area is varied. At the southern end, although the junction of the A5147 with Carr Moss Lane forms a focal point, the conservation area has the character of a ribbon development, rural in nature, with mainly detached houses running along the west side of the main road. This part of the village is dominated by the primary school and Halsall Hall, on either side of the main road. The area was known as Little Hall Green, though there is no evidence of a village green now.
The southern part of the Conservation Area is linked to the larger, northern part by a narrow band of land, comprising the main road and a strip of wooded land to the east. This area is undeveloped, and is now part of a nature walk. The water mill once stood in this area, to the west of the road, with a mill pond on the east side.
The focal point of the northern part of the Conservation Area is a small triangular area of land, formed by the junction of the A5147 with Summerwood Lane, and on which is situated the war memorial. This small area of open space, which is part of the highway, is framed by the church to the north and the former Scarisbrick Arms to the east. The wider area is characterised by open fields and the wooded grounds of the detached houses on the west side of the road, and the extensively wooded grounds of Halsall House on the east side of the road.
The character of the Conservation Area along Summerwood Road is residential, with houses along both sides of the road. The older houses in this area are detached, and evidently rural in nature. Small-scale redevelopment and infill development is also residential in nature, but has a less rural character, appearing somewhat sub-urban.
BUILDING FEATURES
Apart from the church, the historic buildings in Halsall Conservation Area date mostly from the nineteenth century. A significant proportion of the building stock, however, is formed of more modern buildings. Only eleven buildings or structures have been recognised as being of special architectural or historic interest and have been provided statutory protection as listed, one at grade one, and the rest at grade II. One of the grade II structures is also a scheduled ancient monument. These are itemised below, with summaries of the scheduled monument entry or the listed building descriptions.
Halsall medieval rectory.
Scheduled ancient monument 22482, listed grade II.
The upstanding ruins of Halsall medieval rectory, located circa 230m north-east of the church. Built of yellow sandstone, the remains stand to a height of up to 5m. Probably of fourteenth to fifteenth century date, with some rebuilding on the late seventeenth or early eighteenth centuries. It is thought to have been a substantial building, arranged around three or four sides of a courtyard. The listing applies to the upstanding remains, whilst the scheduling includes the below-ground remains.
Church of St Cuthbert. Grade 1-listed building
Present building fourteenth century with early fifteenth century tower, restored in 1886. Much of the exterior appearance of the church was influenced by the 1886 restoration programme. The bulk of the church is of squared sandstone with roofs of stone slate and sheet metal to chancel. Its components include a west tower with south projection built as grammar school, nave, north and south aisles, chancel, north vestry and south porch. The former grammar school is dated 1593 by an inscription above a blocked doorway. Inside the church, on the south wall, are fourteenth century triple sedilia and a piscina, a sixteenth century painted tomb chest, and choir stalls containing fifteenth century woodwork, including misericords and bench ends.
Old font. Grade II
An old font is situated approximately 1m south-east of the church. Dating to the early to mid-nineteenth century, it is of sandstone, octagonal in plan, with blind tracery decoration on its narrow stem. Each face of the bowl has two square foiled panels with central shield.
Sundial. Grade II
Sundial lying approximately 10m south of the church dating to circa 1700, it is built of sandstone with a brass plate and gnomon, probably renewed in twentieth century. Its base is of two steps, with a square plan. Stem is a round column, with central swelling.
War memorial, Halsall Road. Grade II
War memorial dating to circa 1920, and incorporating the fifteenth century village cross base. The base is of sandstone and square in plan, chamfering to an octagon with projecting roll moulding. It rests on an octagonal base with four steps. The shaft is also octagonal. The cross head is gabled and carved with a crucifixion scene. It has an inscription stating that it was erected in memory of Halsall parishioners who fell in the First World War.
58 New Street. Grade II
An early nineteenth century house built of brick in Flemish bond with slate roof. Double- depth in plan, it is of two storeys with attic. Windows are sashed, and have painted stone lintels and sills. The door has a fanlight within an open pediment of a Tuscan pilaster doorcase of painted stone or stucco.
Halsall Hall, New Street. Grade II
Early eighteenth century house of brick with sandstone dressings. Altered in the late eighteenth century, and in the mid-nineteenth century, when it was converted into cottages. Comprises a long range with stone plinth and storey band, with a centre gable flanked by pilaster strips, and a central Venetian sash window to the attic. The building has recently been altered and converted to apartments.
3A Summerwood Lane. Grade II
An early nineteenth century house, built of brick in Flemish bond and of double-depth plan. Situated to the rear of, and attached to, the Post Office. It has sashed windows with stone sills and lintels. It also has a stone pilaster doorcase with fanlight and open pediment.
Halsall House, Halsall Lane. Grade II
Built as a rectory succeeding the building which stands as ruins to the south. Dating to 1847-50, it was built by Sydney Smirke for the Blundell family. It is of coursed sandstone blocks with a slate roof, built in Jacobean style in two storeys with cellars and attics. It comprises a three- window range with short gabled wings at each end, linked by a five-bay loggia with buttressed piers, Perpendicular arches and an embattled parapet.
Ha-ha to east, south and west of Halsall House. Grade II
Probably dated to circa 1850, altered. Built parallel to the three principal façades of the house and approximately 50m away from it, it is built of coursed sandstone rubble. The ditch is around 1m deep, with solid bridges now interrupting the south and east sides.
Entrance gateway to the grounds of Halsall House. Grade II
Probably dated to circa 1850, the gateway consists of coursed, rock-faced sandstone gate piers and walls, with wrought-iron gates and railings. They are of concave plan with an inner pair of gate piers and another pair of terminal piers ;inked by low curved walls.
Important Unlisted Buildings
In addition to the scheduled ancient monument and listed buildings within the Conservation Area, there are other buildings of historic interest which add to the character of the area and its attractive appearance. These buildings have no statutory protection and are most at risk from harmful alterations.
Scarisbrick Arms
This building originated as a private house, but became a public house in 1828. It was clearly rebuilt, probably in the early twentieth century, and has a first storey of brick, and windows with stone lintels and sills. The upper storey is of mock half-timbering, and the front has a central gable, over a wooden porch.
Malt Kiln House, Halsall Road
Malt kilns are marked next to this house on the first edition OS map, though none are extant today. The kilns were certainly in existence by 1821, when maltsters were recorded on the census for Halsall.
Glebe Farm, Summerwood Lane
Glebe Farm was called Rectory Farm in the late nineteenth century, and was almost certainly part of church land. It is situated on Summerwood Lane, not far from the church and the site of the tithe barns. It is now much altered, but its farm buildings indicate a planned, purpose- built nineteenth century farm, though the house may be older. Summerwood Lane
Opposite the church, on Summerwood Lane, are three older houses, numbers 8, 10 and 12. Number 8 is now greatly modernised and altered, but had been the Cocoa Rooms and later the District Bank. This lies next to number 10, a brick-built, late nineteenth century double- fronted house, set back from the road. Number 12 is Chestnut Cottage, a double-fronted house, rendered with a central, round-headed doorway, probably of early-nineteenth century origin.
New Street
In addition to 58 New Street, numbers 44, 46, 62 and 72 (Bank Cottage) are also of nineteenth century origin. Numbers 44 and 46 and semi-detached cottages on the corner of Carr Moss Lane. Although altered and modernised, their low roofline indicates that they are probably at least early nineteenth century in date. Number 62 was in existence by 1880, when it was repaired, and Bank Cottage was built in 1878. Just to the south of the Conservation Area, number 80 was also built in 1878, and it is thought that number 86 was extant by 1773. Mill House Farm, on the southern edge of the settlement, was in existence by the date of the OS 1st edition map in the 1840s.
Halsall Church of England Primary School
The primary school today forms one of the key features of the village, situated on the east side of the main road, opposite Halsall Hall. Brick-built, with brick window and door surrounds, it was begun in 1904, and opened in 1907.
Barn, Halsall Hall
“L”- shaped, brick-built barn, now converted to domestic accommodation, and surveyed in advance of conversion work. The roof comprised five purpose-built trusses, and is thought to be of seventeenth or eighteenth century date. It was probably constructed at the same time as Halsall Hall.
Until the twentieth century, Halsall remained a very small settlement, centred on the church and the west end of Summerwood Lane. Although there were some houses along New Street, these were well-spaced, and the area covered by the Conservation Area would have been largely made up of farmland. The areas of nineteenth century settlement have been infilled by modern housing, but the larger part of the Conservation Area still comprises undeveloped land, most notably the grounds of Halsall House, and land on the west side of the A5147.
Other Important Features
At the north end of the nature walk, next to the former Scarisbrick Arms, is a sandstone-built sluice, which once would have been part of the land drainage system. Although this feature is no longer operational, the stone superstructure is intact, and some of the wooden sluice features still survive. This is an important feature of local history, relating to the draining of the mosses, and control of water flow through the low-lying landscape, enabling the fertile soils to be exploited.
Outside the Post Office on Summerwood Lane is a K6 phone box and post mounted red letter-box. The K6 telephone kiosk is the most recognisable phone box designed in 1935 by Sir Giles Gilbert Scott. The box is made out of cast iron with a doomed roof finished in traditional ‘cherry’ red paint.
Stone-walls form important boundaries to St Cuthbert’s Church along Halsall Road and Summerwood Lane. Significant sections of coursed stonewall (capped with half round copings) remain along New Street and on the corner of Carr Moss Lane.
The southern part of the Conservation Area is generally open, particularly along New Street. There are some roadside trees, however, particularly outside the school, and around Summerwood Lane, there are other mature trees near the roadside in gardens. The greatest area of tree cover, forming an important feature of the Conservation area is along the A5147, opposite the churchyard, and in the grounds of Halsall House. The trees and woodland have a high visual amenity, especially when viewed from a distance and are important features within the Conservation Area. It should however be noted that only a small percentage of the woodland is considered to be part of the public space within the village.
The woodland areas, especially that to the north and north-east of the conservation area are very important for the landscape setting of Halsall.
PRESSURES AND DETRACTING FEATURES
The Council has a duty to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area. The effect on the character or appearance of the area has to be considered in all development. Policies CA.1 to CA.6 in the West Lancashire Local Plan (and Policy EN4 of the Deposit Draft Replacement Local Plan) provide the basis on which the Council will consider all development in the conservation area.
However protecting the special character of the area cannot be carried out in isolation. A substantial amount of the changes, both to buildings and the surrounding land and natural features does not come under the control of the Local Authority. Minor changes, may appear small seen in isolation but the cumulative effect can, over time, harm the special character of the area. The long-term future of the Halsall Conservation Area relies a great deal on the sustainable and sensitive approach of the residents who live in the area.
Halsall was a sparsely populated settlement until the second half of the twentieth century, with a small nucleation around the church. Ribbon development along New Street was well- spaced and rural in character. Along with the key, central buildings of the church and Halsall Hall, the village appears to have undergone rebuilding in the nineteenth century. There are likely to have been a number of surviving older buildings, such as the tithe barn and Hearse House, but these were demolished in the twentieth century. In the second half of the twentieth century, there has been a significant amount of infill development, for example on the site of the tithe barn, and at Chestnut Close opposite Glebe Farm.
Infill development along both Summerwood Lane and New Street has altered the character of a rural settlement with widely spaced buildings, creating a more densely populated village. The number of listed buildings within the Conservation Area remains significant, and whilst some of the other buildings of historic interest have been the subject of varied house improvements and alterations, the village retains a historic core.
One of the primary pressures on the Conservation Area, as seems increasingly typical in modern times, is the volume of traffic moving through the settlement. The main road is the A5147, a key route from Southport to Maghull. Parking is thus limited, discouraging the casual visitor, even on Summerwood Lane. Here, most residents have access to off-street parking, and even the Post Office, which is situated next to a bend, does not have anywhere for customers to park, apart from on the road. Overall, the current character of Halsall is one of a small, dispersed rural settlement. CONCLUSIONS
A conservation area is defined as “an area of special architectural or historic interest, the character of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance”. This appraisal clearly demonstrates that Halsall Conservation Area still retains its architectural and historic interest, but that its location on the main road, and the post war infill development has detracted somewhat from Halsall’s overall character and appearance as a conservation area. Undoubtedly, however, the area currently defined as the conservation area boundary does contain the most significant structures of architectural and historic interest within the village.
This appraisal provides an opportunity to highlight some of the important features and buildings in Halsall Conservation Area, as well as promoting a better understanding of the issues, which specifically relate to the area as a way of retaining the area’s special character or appearance.
Many individual properties are of significant value within the local context and have been highlighted as making a significant contribution to the special character of the area. There are a number of these properties that add interest to the settlement. As many are otherwise unprotected from alteration and development, the villages conservation area status assists in managing the changes and preserving the overall character and appearance of the area.
The village of Halsall contains features of both historical and architectural interest, which justifies, on its own the settlement’s status as a conservation area. In total 10 buildings within the conservation area have statutory protection as Grade II listed buildings, which highlights the local importance of the settlement through the C19th. In addition, the Church of St Cuthbert is listed Grade I and the ruins of Halsall Rectory are a scheduled ancient monument, indicating that they are of national importance. The church, war memorial, and small number of historic buildings provide an impression of a settlement centre, though the conservation area extends some way along the A5147, reflecting the more dispersed nature of the older settlement. The northern end of the conservation area is distinctly rural in style, with open fields and the extensive, partly wooded grounds of Halsall House. These areas are privately owned with little or no public access being available. For the casual visitor, this area is unfortunately dominated by the A5147, a busy main road.
The current conservation area covers most of the historic core of Halsall. The older houses at 80 and 86 New Street, and Mill House Farm, are not included within the conservation area, but would appear to fit in with the character of the rest of the area along New Street. HALSALL CONSERVATION AREA PROPOSALS
It is the duty of the local planning authority to determine whether the existing boundary of the conservation area is still appropriate and whether any further parts should be designated as a conservation area or indeed deleted from it.
The local planning authority must also from time to time formulate and publish proposals for the preservation and enhancement of conservation areas. Any enhancement proposals formulated, under this section, will be submitted for further public consideration.
This appraisal document has raised several issues, which should form part of any proposed action and be considered alongside policies for the area as set out in the West Lancashire Local Plan.
In common with other conservation area appraisals produced by the local authority, the following issues have been recognised for consideration in respect of Halsall Conservation Area:
• Whether the existing conservation area boundary is appropriate. • Whether it is necessary to sanction additional controls over development in the form of the imposition of an Article 4 (2) direction. • To look at further development in the conservation area. • To assess the need for environmental improvements in the conservation area.
The Conservation Area Boundary
Following a full assessment of the area, it is recognised that Halsall Conservation Area still retains a special character and appearance, which is well defined and worthy of protection and continued designation as a conservation area.
As part of this review, the buildings south of the current conservation area boundary on New Street were identified and considered for inclusion within the conservation area. They include Mill House Farm and numbers 80 and 86 New Street. As historic properties are relatively spread out and few buildings within Halsall pre-date the nineteenth century these properties should be considered of being historical importance, even where there has been some alteration and modernisation.
It is thus recommended that the boundary of the conservation area be extended to include the houses on western side of New Street as far south as Mill House Farm.
Plan 4 Article 4 Direction
There is currently no Article 4 Direction in place in Halsall Conservation Area. Owners can therefore, at present, carry out minor alterations/changes to there residential properties, such as replacing windows and doors and adding small scale extensions/porches without the need for planning permission.
An Article 4(2) Direction allows the Council to remove some of these ‘permitted development rights’ where this would help preserve the special character and appearance of the conservation area. Works to alter the fronts of properties which are viewed from a public highway or footpath would therefore require planning permission.
Some parts of Halsall are more vulnerable to inappropriate ‘home improvements’ than others. Many of the smaller cottages have already lost their traditional architectural features/ windows and doors resulting in an erosion in the appearance of the street frontage over time. An Article 4(2) Direction would cover only domestic properties and would be used to manage the changes to the character and appearance of properties. Controls would be applied to works to: • extend, enlarge or alter existing properties (this includes any form of extension or conservatory and works to alter or change windows/doors on the property) • Alterations to roofs • the erection of porches • the construction or laying down of hardstanding for vehicles • the partial demolition of walls • the erection of gates, fences or walls.
The appraisal for the Halsall Conservation Area has helped to confirm the important characteristics of the conservation area. The character of the settlement, as a relatively loose rural village, with widely spaced houses, has been altered in the late twentieth century by the infilling of some of the gaps and open spaces within the conservation area. Most recent development has been the small-scale construction of detached houses.
The potential benefit would however not be uniform across the conservation area. The distinctive character of the northern part of the village and the sparse nature of the development would limit any benefit gained by imposing an Article 4(2). The southern area along New Street is characterised by frontage cottage development, most being of some historic value.
It is worth noting that the loss of hedges is not controlled by this measure and relies on the sympathetic approach of owners.
After careful consideration the Council considers that the application of an Article 4(2) Direction within Halsall Conservation Area will be an important ‘tool’ in restricting the permitted development rights of property owners and could result in the reduction of minor, uncontrolled development within the area. It is proposed that a Direction be applied to the southern portion of the conservation area extending from Halsall Hall south along New Street, including the proposed extension (see above), to Mill House Farm.
Further Development in the Conservation Area
Small-scale new development is continuing in Halsall, for example at the southern end of Summerwood Lane. The conservation area contains large areas of open land which may become subject to development pressures, particularly along the west side of the A5147 between Summerwood Lane and Carr Moss Lane, and opposite Halsall House grounds.
These open spaces are a key feature of the Conservation Area’s rural character. New development would have to be considered very carefully if it is not to compromise the character of the area.
Works to Trees in Conservation Areas
Most trees in Conservation Areas are subject to controls, which exist to protect this special character. If a tree is not protected by a Preservation Order (TPO), but is within the conservation area, 6 weeks notice must be given in writing to the District Council of an intention to carry out works to trees (pruning or felling) or any root systems. This is often difficult to monitor on private land that covers such a large area. The trees and woodlands protected by Tree Preservation Orders (TPO’s) have recently been re-surveyed. The existing TPO’s in the area are shown within the appraisal document.
The Council is keen to promote good tree management within the conservation area and the Council’s Aboricultural Officer offers advice to owners both indirectly through leaflets and directly with specialist advice. The Council is keen to promote the proper management of the existing woodland areas within Halsall and where possible will support the introduction of new planting, where appropriate. It is also important to ensure that the replacement of protected trees, at the end of their natural life, are provided to provide a continuity of woodland within the area.
Environmental Improvements in the Conservation Area
The Appraisal identifies several detracting features within the Conservation Area. Some of these features, and the action required to remedy the situation, are set out below
Detracting Features Action Required Implementation
The cumulative effect of minor Better understanding of The appraisal should become alterations and extensions (inc. architectural designs and the wider adopted by the Council as SPG demolition to buildings), conservation area and better and be used by Development which affect the character and control and enforcement where Control. Traditional features erode the special character and necessary grant scheme. appearance of the area. Loss of the historic character. Help and guidance to owners to Through advice from the help them make the best-informed Conservation Unit and through decisions relating to alterations. the development control process. Modern infill development, Better understanding of Look at the current Article 4 altering the character of the architectural designs and the wider Direction. Consider a grant conservation area conservation area and better scheme to promote the use of control and enforcement where traditional designs and retention necessary. of important features. Loss and non-replacement of Need for owners to better manage Grant scheme for tree planting. trees and woodland. and maintain woodland. Continue Local Authority action via to provide specialist advice/leaflet. Arboricultural advice and through the development control process.
Inappropriate position/design Need to ensure the character and Negotiation and partnership of road signs and traffic appearance of the conservation with LCC as Highway marking. area is considered carefully in any Authority. traffic schemes. Untidy appearance of Encourage better/improved Through negotiation with forecourts to commercial treatment of forecourt/parking owners and possible partnership buildings areas. funding. Modern street lighting and Consider replacement with new Local Authority action in street furniture. columns/lanterns etc in an conjunction with LCC for appropriate design. replacement scheme, if funding becomes available. Heavy traffic and the use of Carefully consider appropriate Through discussion and the A5147. traffic control/calming measures in potential partnership with the the village. Highway Authority (LCC).
Summary
The Halsall Conservation Area is an area of historic interest, encompassing the medieval settlement centre. Key elements of its character are the large areas of open space and farmland between the areas of development, the dispersed nature and general openness of the development and the woodland areas surrounding the northern parts of the village. APPENDIX A
PRINCIPAL EFFECTS OF CONSERVATION AREA DESIGNATION
By designating a conservation area the Council is confirming that it regards the area as a place where special care should be taken to maintain and improve its visual character. This means that change in a conservation area is subject to greater control than elsewhere, principally:
1. Special attention shall be paid in the exercise of planning functions to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of a conservation area.
2. Conservation Area Consent is required from the Council for the demolition (with some exceptions) of buildings and walls.
3. The Council must be given six weeks notice of any proposal to carry out any work to any tree within the area.
4. Permitted Development Rights (i.e. those building works which do not require planning permission) were removed in Halsall by the Council in 1977. The Article 4(1) Direction limits what work you can carry out, to your property, without first applying for planning permission. The restrictions relate to the following aspects of development within the conservation area:
- the enlargement or extension of dwellings including the erection of detached buildings such as garages or stables within the curtilage of the property; - the cladding of the exterior with stone, artificial stone, timber, plastic or tiles; - the erection of any new buildings such as garden sheds with a cubic content greater than 10 cubic metres; - the enlargement of the dwelling by adding to or altering its roof; - the erection of porches outside any external door of the property; - the construction or laying down of hardstanding for vehicles; - the provision of gates, fences, walls or other means of enclosure.
[The legislation relating to permitted Development Rights is complicated and could be subject to change. It is, therefore, advisable to check with the planning authority before carrying out any building works].
PRINCIPAL EFFECTS OF LISTED BUILDING CONTROL
The statutory list of buildings of architectural or historic interest is compiled by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, and includes a wide variety of structures. Inclusion of a building on the list identifies that building as having special interest and brings any alterations to that building under planning control.
There is a general presumption in favour of the preservation of listed buildings because they represent a finite resource. Controls apply to the whole building, both internal and external and to all works which would affect a building’s character. Works of basic maintenance are exempt from control - on a like for like basis, unless there is an element of alteration or rebuilding.
It is a criminal offence to carry out unauthorised alterations to a listed building, so it is always best to consult with the Local Authority to determine whether consent for work to a building is required.
APPENDIX B
LANCASHIRE COUNTY SITES AND MONUMENTS RECORDS
The following features mentioned in the text are recorded as sites of archaeological interest on the Lancashire County Sites and Monuments Record:
Halsall medieval Rectory as well as being a Scheduled Monument is also Lancashire Sites and Monuments Record PRN 33. Halsall Rectory, also known as Halsall Abbey of Halsall Priory, is described as a substantial structure, thought to have been arranged around the 3 or 4 sides of a courtyard. The Tithe Map of 1843 (as well as the 1st Edition OS Survey of 1845-6, Lancashire Sheet 83) shows further structures to the east, north and west, which may have formed part of the complex of buildings to be found in a rectory. Buried archaeological remains are therefore thought likely to be found outside the current limits of the scheduled area. Such remains could be by their association considered of national importance. You may wish to consider adding that changes to the monument would require scheduled monument consent, which is obtained from the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport through consultation with English Heritage, and that metal detecting is not permitted on such sites. I have enclosed a map with the scheduled area highlighted – its actual boundaries are the black line below the red. Policy EN6 of the West Lancashire Replacement Local Plan would apply to this site.
Church of St Cuthbert (PRN 818), which contained Halsall Free Grammar School (PRN 817) Font (PRN 18484) Sundial (PRN 14845) War memorial (PRN 18482) incorporates the cross base (PRN 815) 58 New Street (PRN 18488) Halsall Hall (PRN 819) was recorded prior to conversion. A copy of the record is held by the Lancashire County Archaeology Service (PRN 23877) 3A Summerwood Lane (PRN 18490) Halsall House (PRN 14843) Malt Kiln House – site of malt kilns shown on 1st Edition OS Survey of 1845-6, Lancashire Sheet 83 (PRN 8768) Glebe Farm (PRN 1562) Scarisbrick Arms (PRN 8771) L-shaped barn (PRN 20052)
Additional sites recorded on the SMR within the limits of the Conservation Area include:
A skeleton found next to the vestry in 1873 (PRN 816) at SD 3704 1028 A Roman brooch found to the north east of the Church (PRN 15039) at SD 3712 1036 1A Summerwood Lane (PRN 8770) – the site of the White Horse Inn (on 1st Edition OS Survey) at SD 3310 1029 The site of Halsall Water Mill (PRN 820) at SD 3690 1016
Proposals affecting the above sites may therefore meet with a comment from the Lancashire County Archaeology Service, but this will very much depend on the nature and extent of the proposals.
MILL LANE CONSERVATION AREA
DRAFT CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL
JULY 2005 Contents
Preface - Purpose of the appraisal 3
1 Introduction 4
2 Location and setting 4
3 Historical Evolution 6
4 Land uses 9
5 Building Features 10
6 Pressures and Detracting features 15
7 Conclusions 16
8 Proposals 17
9 Appendix A - Principal effects of Conservation Area status and 21 Listed Building Control 10 Appendix B - Lancashire County Sites And Monuments Records 22
List of Plans
Plan 1 Current Conservation Area Boundary and Proposed Extension 5
Plan 2 1892 Plan of Parbold 8
Plan 3 Plan showing Listed Buildings and other important buildings 14
July 2005
Preface
This appraisal is part of a programme of The appraisals will also provide a basis for: appraisals of all the current and proposed reviewing conservation area boundaries; guiding conservation areas in West Lancashire. future local authority action in preparing enhancement schemes and in guiding the actions The District Council has an obligation under of others; and, where appropriate, increasing Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings planning controls. and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 to review, from time to time, its conservation area It is intended that these issues will be considered designations and consider any new areas, and in full consultation with local residents and under Section 71 of this Act, to formulate and landowners, local interest groups, the Parish publish proposals for the preservation and Council, the Conservation Areas Advisory Panel enhancement of these areas. and Lancashire County Council.
When West Lancashire’s existing Finally, this document will hopefully raise conservation areas were designated in the awareness of the special qualities of the 1970’s and 1980’s it was generally recognised Conservation Area so that as the area continues to that these areas were of a special character evolve, it does so in a sympathetic way and the which warranted preservation and essential character of the area is maintained for enhancement. However, very little was future generations. actually written down as to which features were important in this respect. English What is a Conservation Area? Heritage now recommend the carrying out of appraisals which will allow a full assessment A conservation area is an area of “special of the characteristics of existing and proposed architectural or historic interest”, the character of conservation areas. This will enable the which is considered worthy of protection and Council to decide whether the conservation improvement. It is the combination of the area still has sufficient character to warrant its buildings, street patterns, open spaces, vistas, designation or whether the area needs landmarks and other features which give a extending in any way. conservation area its distinctive character. This character should be the focus of efforts towards The appraisals will also highlight the preservation and enhancement. implications for the future preservation and enhancement of a conservation area. Under Planning Legislation the local authority has wider powers than usual to control development The policies on conservation areas contained which might damage the area’s character. The within the West Lancashire Local Plan form controls which exist in conservation areas are the basis for determining planning contained at the end of this document. applications for development in these areas. This appraisal should be read in conjunction It is important that there is a consensus on the with these policies and will form a material quality and importance of a particular consideration in the consideration of planning conservation area in order to assist in its applications and planning appeals. maintenance and enhancement. To be successful, conservation policy must be a partnership between West Lancashire District Council and the many interests involved in the conservation area’s future.
Introduction
The Mill Lane Conservation Area was designated by West Lancashire District Council in 1975 and was last reviewed, in part, in 1985. The conservation area covers a portion of the village of Parbold to the south of the railway line, totalling just over 6 hectares, and is defined by development on either side of Mill Lane, which forms the main village street, and Bradshaw Lane to the south of the A5209. The area forms one of the historic cores of Parbold, comprising houses and small-scale industrial buildings of the nineteenth century, with some modern development filling the spaces between. This forms the southern end of the modern extent of the village of Parbold.
LOCATION AND SETTING
Location and Landscape Setting
Parbold is situated on the lowest slopes of Parbold Hill, on the edge of the West Lancashire plain at NGR SD 491 109 (centred), just off the A5209 road to Ormskirk from Standish. It is situated around 8km from Ormskirk to the west and around 4.5km from Skelmersdale to the south. Lying at the base of the hill, the landscape in and to the west of Parbold is gently rolling, and slopes down to the River Douglas to the west and south. To the east of the village, however, land rises sharply to Parbold Hill at around 130m aOD. The countryside is a lowland area of mixed arable and pasture farming comprising mainly improved pasture with arable fields. The field pattern is large-scale, with loss of hedgerow and hedgerow trees. Woodland is sparse.
The underlying solid geology of the area consists of Upper Carboniferous Silesian Limestones. Parbold lies on the edge of the Lower Westphalian, mainly productive, coal measures. These are generally well-covered by thick glacial and post-glacial deposits, primarily comprised of thick tills but with extensive Shirdley Hill sand deposits and coarse- textured fluvio-glacial deposits overlying till. The coal measures and the presence of Harrock Hill Grit, a coarse hardwearing sandstone, provided the basis for coal mining and quarrying industries in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Important Views
Views within the conservation area are limited because of the close development of houses within the historic core of the village. The main focal point is provided by the Leeds Liverpool Canal. The road bridge crossing the canal provides views both along the canal, and along Mill Street.
The conservation area is divided in two by the main road, the A5209. Beyond the road, the southern end of the conservation area encompasses Bradshaw Lane, a narrow rural road in a low-lying area. Views along this road are thus restricted, though there are views across the low-lying fields to the north.
HISTORICAL EVOLUTION
Origins
In the medieval period, Parbold appears originally to have formed part of the township of Wrightington, and was held by Robert de Lathom before 1242. The Lathom family held Parbold down to the end of the seventeenth century. Around 1680, the manor was sold to John Crisp, whose family sold it to William Dicconson of Wrightington in 1791. Other substantial land holders included the Knights Hospitillars and Burscough Priory. The name Parbold derives from Old English and means the dwelling where the pear trees grow. The settlement appears to have evolved as a number of small nucleations within the township, including Mill Lane and Bradshaw Lane, and thus covered much of the Mill Lane Conservation Area. Despite its early origins, there are no standing buildings which date to earlier than the eighteenth century.
Although Mill Lane was one of the early centres of settlement in Parbold, from the depiction of Parbold on Thomas Yates’s map of Lancashire in 1786, this would have been no more than a hamlet, comprising four or five houses or farms. It appears to have been focused around the junction of Mill Lane with Alder Lane (now the A5092), in an area known as Stocks, the name deriving from the location of the village stocks there. This indicates that it was a traditional centre of settlement. Stocks Tavern lies on the east corner of the junction, with older cottages on the other side of the road. Yates’s map also shows that there was at least one building on the far side of the main road, on Bradshaw Lane.
Leeds Liverpool Canal and the development of Mill Lane
The area covered by the Mill Lane Conservation Area only began to develop following the opening of the Leeds Liverpool Canal in the third quarter of the eighteenth century. In particular, it provided transport for the stone and coal extracted from local quarries and mines. The canal runs east west on the south side of Parbold, then turns sharply south east of Mill Lane, marking a change in the route from the original plans. The 1770 parliamentary act showed the route continuing north to Mawdesley, but this was changed to take the canal through Wigan. The beginnings of the cut to Mawdesley was turned into a graving dock. Boat building became an established local industry as early as 1786, and the graving dock continued in use until 1943. Wharves were established along the canal next to Mill Lane. As well as stone quarrying and coal mining, the canal also allowed Parbold to develop as a centre for the transport of agricultural produce, with the establishment of stockyards and large-scale corn milling. By 1833, lime for land improvement was being brought in by canal, and burnt in a limekiln to the west of Mill Lane. This lime kiln was still extant, though ruined, in the 1990s, but no longer appears to survive.
In 1794 a wind mill was established next to the canal, on the west side of Mill Lane. This replaced a water mill, which had originated as the manorial corn mill in the medieval period, and was located on the River Douglas, just to the south of the canal. The wind mill was known as Nathan’s Mill, and had an adjacent warehouse. When it was put up for sale in 1817, it was described as being built of good stone, with two pairs of French stones and two pairs of grey stones. The windmill continued to work until the mid-nineteenth century, when it was owned by Hugh Ainscough. He replaced it with a steam-driven corn mill before 1860, where he ground large quantities of imported corn, particularly corn from the United States of America, imported through Liverpool. On the other side of Mill Lane is a canal-side warehouse, now used as a shop. Of two-storeys with an attic level, the lifting beam and three entrances can still be seen on the canal-side gable end wall of the building.
Nineteenth century development
The opening of the railway in 1855 gave a further impetus to the development, not only of the Mill Lane area, but for the whole of Parbold, even though it led to a decline in the use of the canal. Parbold became a commuter area for the middle-classes, and a recreation area for Manchester, peaking in the 1930s. This led to an influx of migrant workers and further development. Houses were built along Mill Lane, including a number of houses in short terraces, clearly intended for the lower middle-classes, as well as more obviously middle- class semi-detached houses, with ground- and first-floor bay windows, with gables above, and small front gardens. Development extended beyond Mill Lane, to the north of the railway line, where in the late nineteenth century Thomas Myers built around 30 houses, as well as the Railway Hotel and Beacon View on Bradshaw Lane. The Railway Hotel was in existence by 1872, when it was kept by Thomas Alty, a local coal merchant. Plan of 1892 Parbold
LAND USES
The land and property within the conservation area is predominantly residential, in private ownership, though there is a significant commercial presence, particularly to the south of the canal. The canal and the A5209 (Alder Lane) divide the conservation area into three distinct areas, with the canal forming a fourth area. The buildings along Station Road are mostly residential, semi-detached houses, with a modern development of apartments and houses at the south end next to the canal. The area has an early suburban character, created by the brick-built semi-detached, late Victorian villas, with front gardens. These houses, probably part of the development by Thomas Myers, have datestones of 1883 and 1884. At least two of these houses at the northern end have been used as commercial premises, and at the time of writing, one was closed up and for sale. At the south end, next to the modern development, are three older cottages, perhaps relating to development following the opening of the canal. Adjacent to the canal is the development of apartments and houses, which were built on the site of Ainscough’s steam corn mill. This has a modern residential character.
South of the canal, the conservation area continues to have a suburban character, but generally comprises more older buildings than the area to the north. The older residential buildings are mostly on the east side of Mill Lane, and concentrated at the south end, where the junction of Mill Lane with Alder Lane represents the original focal point of the hamlet. Stocks Tavern, on the corner of the junction commemorates the site of the village stocks in this area. There is a small modern development of detached houses to the rear of these older houses. The west side of Mill Lane was clearly developed in the late nineteenth century, and is dominated by a terrace and two blocks of semi-detached, brick-built houses.
To the south of Alder Lane, on Bradshaw Lane, houses are either detached or semi- detached, with one short row of five houses. This area has a more rural character, and includes a number of stone-built cottages dating to at least the early nineteenth century. Amongst these older houses, and some late nineteenth century houses, there is a significant degree of modern infill development.
The canal forms the focal point of the conservation area, creating a rural corridor between Station Road and Mill Lane. The former graving dock survives only as a canal feature, but is now surrounded by modern development. Along most of the length of the canal this modern development is screened by trees and bushes from the canal, except in the area of the former steam corn mill, where the apartments and houses front directly onto the canal side. The former industrial function of this area survives only in the brick- and stone-built wharf along the canal edge. On either side of Mill Lane, on the south bank of the canal, the character is a commercial one, with the original canal-side development of windmill and warehouses reused as modern businesses, including an art gallery.
The northern end of the conservation area terminates at the railway line, where it crosses Station Road. Parbold Station is still in operation, and a signal box and former station house still stand, along with the Railway Hotel.
BUILDING FEATURES
The Mill Lane conservation area is comprises predominantly nineteenth century development, with a significant number of buildings dating to the late eighteenth or early nineteenth century. The older buildings are concentrated around the Stocks Tavern area and in Bradshaw Lane, defining a more rural character for the southern end of the conservation area from the more suburban north end. Although there are a number of older houses within the conservation area, there is only one building which has been recognised as being of special architectural or historic interest and has been provided statutory protection as listed, at grade II. Details are given below. Additional comments are given in italics.
Parbold Mill, Mill Lane
Windmill tower, now shop and art gallery. Dated to c 1800. Built of sandstone rubble in five storeys with battered walls and embattled parapet. Known as Nathan’s Mill, it was probably erected in 1794.
Important Unlisted Buildings
In addition to the two listed buildings within the conservation area, there are other buildings of historic interest which add to the character of the area. These buildings have no statutory protection and are most at risk from harmful alterations, and in some cases have already been subject to substantial changes.
2-30 Station Road
A series of red-brick, semi-detached houses built in 1883 to 1884, probably by Thomas Myers, who was known to have built around 30 houses in Parbold. Clearly intended to be middle-class accommodation, they may have been built for the growing population of commuters to Manchester who settled in Parbold from the late nineteenth century. A number have had replacement windows.
32-36 Station Road
A row of three small cottages, brick-built and dating to before the mid-1840s when the Ordnance Survey 1st edition map was surveyed and published. Modern windows and doors.
2-4 Mill Lane
A former canal-side warehouse, and known as New House from at least 1848. It was in existence by 1837. A two-storey structure, built of coursed, squared, graduated sandstone, it was built gable-end on to the canal, where three doorways with hoist above provided access for goods to the two storeys plus attic. The building is now partly in commercial use, and partly residential.
The Windmill public house
The Windmill public house was built following the opening of the canal and before 1837. It is a double-fronted, double-depth building, built of coursed, squared, graduated sandstone, painted white, with quoins painted black.
5-9 Mill Lane
A pair of attached cottages, number 5-7 now used as a shop. This is the older of the two buildings, and appears to have been in existence before 1786. It is stone-built, with evidence of water-shot construction, but is now partly rendered and whitewashed. Number 9 is also stone-built, of coursed, squared, graduated sandstone, and was in existence by 1837. Both have replacement windows.
6-8 Mill Lane
A pair of coursed, squared sandstone- built cottages, number 6 double- fronted, and number 8 single-fronted. They were built by the mid- nineteenth century. Both have UPVC replacement windows.
11-35 Mill Lane
Late-nineteenth century, brick-built houses, comprising two pairs of semi-detached and a terrace of nine houses, with rear scullery extensions. All have small front gardens and, as with the houses on Station Road, were clearly built to attract commuters.
10-18 Mill Lane
A row of five stone-built cottages, dating to the second half of the nineteenth century. They are of coursed, squared sandstone to the front, and of random rubble construction on the gable end. Some with replacement UPVC windows.
Mill Lane and Alder Lane
A group of coursed, squared sandstone-built cottages, dating to the late eighteenth or early nineteenth century, but marking the traditional centre of Parbold, and the site of the village stocks. It includes Stocks House, now the Stocks Tavern, a public house, but built on the corner of the junction
3-11 Bradshaw Lane
The oldest surviving houses along Bradshaw Lane, they are thought to have been in existence by 1786. They comprise a row of five, coursed, squared sandstone-built cottages, with the two easternmost cottages slightly offset. Although this area now appears to be distinct from Mill Lane, having a more rural character, this was originally part of the traditional centre of Parbold.
17-19 Bradshaw Lane
Pair of double-fronted, coursed, squared sandstone-built cottages, in existence by 1837. Number 17 has had replacement UPVC windows, whilst number 19 was undergoing renovation at the time of this appraisal.
Douglas Farm, Bradshaw Lane
Douglas Farm, at the south-eastern end of the conservation area, is a double-fronted house apparently in existence by 1786. The building has been heavily modernised, rendered and painted and has replacement windows and doors.
Until the second half of the nineteenth century, it is clear that this area of Parbold consisted of cottages and small-scale industry associated with the canal, scattered along Station Road, Mill Lane and Bradshaw Lane. It was only with the advent of the railway that development took place on any substantial scale, leading to infill ribbon development along these roads. Further development within the conservation area comprises some infilling behind the street frontages, or redevelopment, particularly along the north bank of the canal.
Other Important Features
Parbold cabin signal box is a grade II listed building lying outside conservation area, on the north side of the railway line. It was built in 1877 on the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Wigan to Southport line. Built of brick and timber with a hipped slate roof and rectangular in plan. It has external timber steps on the east side and a chimney on the north. It is a Saxby and Farmer Type 9 box. On the opposite side of Station Road, and also outside the conservation area, is Parbold Station. The station house is of two-storeys, stone-built, with a single-storey gabled porch to the front, with gables above the second floor windows.
On the south side of the railway line, but also lying outside the conservation area, is the Railway Hotel, built by Thomas Myers, and in existence by 1872 when it was run by a local coal merchant. It is a double-fronted, double-depth building, rendered and painted. It has a side wing with a two storey, half-hexagonal bay. This lies just to the north of the Conservation Area.
The canal bridge carrying Mill Lane/Station Road over the Leeds Liverpool Canal. Here the towpath changes from the south side of the canal to the north. Although the original bridge was replaced in the 1970s, the eastern approaches to the bridge from the canal survive, and show that it was originally a ‘change’ bridge, that is it allowed horses towing the barges to cross to the towpath on the other bank without having to unhitch them.
The canal, including the former graving dock, forms a key feature and provides a green corridor through the conservation area. There is development along both banks of the canal within the conservation area, but in most areas, this is screened from the canal by trees and bushes. It is only on the north bank of the canal, to the east of Station Road, where residential development has been allowed to develop next to the canal. This is the area that was once occupied by the steam-powered Ainscough’s mill, and was an area occupied by industrial development from the mid-nineteenth century. The wharves and docks which once lined the canal in Parbold have now gone, and the only remains of its industrial past are the windmill and the former warehouse.
PRESSURES AND DETRACTING FEATURES
The Council has a duty to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area. The effect on the character or appearance of the area has to be considered in all development. Policies CA.1 to CA.6 in the West Lancashire Local Plan (and Policy EN4 of the Deposit Draft Replacement Local Plan) provide the basis on which the Council will consider all development in the conservation area.
However protecting the special character of the area cannot be carried out in isolation. A substantial amount of the changes, both to buildings and the surrounding land and natural features does not come under the control of the Local Authority. Minor changes, may appear small seen in isolation but the cumulative effect can, over time, harm the special character of the area. The long term future of the Mill Lane Conservation Area relies a great deal on the sustainable and sensitive approach of the residents who live in the area.
This part of Parbold has a high percentage of buildings, within its historic core, surviving from the nineteenth century, and some which date to the late eighteenth century. Although this is one of the oldest centres of settlement in Parbold, the relatively late date of the buildings probably indicates that from the eighteenth century, traditional timber-framed buildings were replaced with sandstone, and thatch with stone slates. These cottages tended to be of vernacular design though some, such as the pair of double-fronted houses in Bradshaw Lane, show some classical influences in style. Most of these older houses have been modernised and altered. In particular, the replacement of original sash and casement windows with UPVC. The main character of the conservation area, however, is derived from the late nineteenth century, brick-built terraces and semi-detached villas, which create a suburban feel. These too have been the subject of modernisation, and in general, there has been much diminution of the value of the historic fabric through over restoration and unsympathetic house improvements.
One of the primary pressures on the conservation area is infill development. In particular, there is the redevelopment of the former Ainscough’s Mill, the development of Mill Field to the rear of Mill Lane, and piecemeal development along Bradshaw Lane. In Bradshaw Lane, the character remains rural, but is now dominated by twentieth century houses. The volume of traffic using the A5209 also serves as a detracting feature, as it is one of the principal routes across West Lancashire from the M6. It provides a barrier across the conservation area, cutting off Bradshaw Lane from the rest of Parbold. CONCLUSIONS
A conservation area is defined as “an area of special architectural or historic interest, the character of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance”. This appraisal clearly demonstrates that the Mill Lane Conservation Area contains both architectural and historic interest which continues to justify its conservation area status.
This appraisal provides an opportunity to highlight some of the important features and buildings in the Mill Lane Conservation Area, as well as promoting a better understanding of the issues which specifically relate to the area as a way of retaining the area’s special character or appearance.
Many individual properties are of significant value within the local context and have been highlighted as making a significant contribution to the special character of the area.
The Mill Lane area clearly contains features of both historical and architectural interest, which justifies its status as a conservation area. Although only one building, the former windmill, has statutory protection as a grade II listed buildings, many of the other buildings have historic significance for the post medieval development of Parbold, and are of at least local importance. In addition to the surviving stone-built houses which reflect Parbold’s existence as a rural settlement, and its development as a canal side settlement, the later brick- built houses reflect Parbold’s nineteenth century status as a small industrial and commuter village. The canal forms a distinct division across the conservation area, with the northern part more obviously influenced by development following the opening of the railway, and the southern part comprising more mixed housing, reflecting the influence of the canal, as well as later houses for commuters. The A5209, a busy main road, also forms a distinct dividing line, with the houses in Bradshaw Lane retaining a more rural character.
The conservation area does not include the area of the station, the Railway Hotel and the listed grade II signal box. These features are important aspects of Parbold’s late nineteenth century development. MILL LANE CONSERVATION AREA PROPOSALS
It is the duty of the local planning authority to determine whether the existing boundary of the conservation area is still appropriate and whether any further parts should be designated as a conservation area or indeed deleted from it.
The local planning authority must also from time to time formulate and publish proposals for the preservation and enhancement of conservation areas. Any enhancement proposals formulated, under this section, will be submitted for further public consideration.
This appraisal document has raised several issues which should form part of any proposed action and be considered alongside policies for the area as set out in the West Lancashire Local Plan.
In common with other conservation area appraisals produced by the local authority, the following issues have been recognised for consideration in respect of Mill Lane Conservation Area:
• whether the existing conservation area boundary is appropriate • whether it is necessary to sanction additional controls over development in the form of the imposition of an Article 4 (2) direction • to look at further development in the conservation area • to assess the need for environmental improvements in the conservation area
The Conservation Area Boundary
Following a full assessment of the area, it is recognised that the Mill Lane Conservation Area still retains a special character which is well defined and worthy of protection and designation as a conservation area.
As part of this review, the area to the immediate north of the current conservation area boundary was considered for inclusion in the conservation area. It comprises numbers 2 and 4 Station Road, the Railway Hotel, Parbold Station and signal box. Dating to the second half of the nineteenth century, the development of the railway was of considerable historical importance to both Parbold’s industrial past, and to its development as a commuter settlement.
It is thus recommended that the boundary of the conservation area is changed to include the area up to and immediately to the north of the railway line to include 2-4 Station Road, the Railway Hotel, the railway station and signal box, the Royal Bank of Scotland building, Post Office and 3 The Common.
The area of modern development in Mill Leat Close and Mill Leat Mews was considered for exclusion from the conservation area. It comprises a low-rise apartment block and a small development of terraced houses, mostly brick-built. This replaced a steam-powered corn mill and wharf. It is considered that to exclude this area would severely compromise the overall integrity of the conservation area, effectively separating the Station Road area from the canal and Mill Lane.
For the reason indicated above it is thus recommended that the boundary of the conservation area is not changed to exclude the Mill Leat Close and Mews development as this deletion would harm the integrity of the conservation area.
Article 4 Direction
There is currently no restriction on the ‘rights’ of property owners to carry out minor works to their properties within Mill Lane Conservation Area over and above those which normally exist in conservation areas. Owners can therefore undertake ‘permitted development’ alterations without the need to obtain planning permission.
An Article 4(2) Direction can be applied by the Council to an area to remove some of the ‘permitted development rights’ of owners where this would help preserve the special character and appearance of the conservation area. Only works to alter the fronts of domestic properties, which are viewed from a public highway or footpath would be covered and thereby require planning permission.
Some parts of Parbold are clearly vulnerable to incremental changes to properties and ‘home improvements’ to some of the cottages have resulted in the loss of traditional features resulting in an erosion in the character and appearance of the ‘streetscene’ over time. Problems are often exacerbated where properties are bought and sold and new residents are not fully aware of the importance of buildings or the area in general. A degree of minor uncontrolled change has therefore continued unabated over the last 30 years. An Article 4(2) Direction would cover domestic properties only and would be used to manage not stop changes to properties. Controls would be applied to works to:
• extend, enlarge or alter existing properties (this includes any form of extension or conservatory and works to alter or change windows/doors on the property) • the erection of porches • alterations to roofs • the construction or laying down of hardstanding for vehicles • the partial demolition of walls • the erection of gates, fences or walls.
The Direction relates only to domestic properties and any minor work relating to business or non-residential properties should be considered against the normal test of whether they would materially affect the appearance of the building.
The loss of hedges is not controlled by this measure and relies on the sympathetic approach of owners.
After careful consideration the Council considers that the application of an Article 4(2) Direction within Mill Lane Conservation Area is an important ‘tool’ in restricting the permitted development rights of property owners and would result in the management of minor, uncontrolled development within the area to the benefit of the character and appearance of the conservation area. It is proposed that the Direction be applied to cover the whole of the conservation area boundary including the proposed new extension to the area.
Further Development in the Conservation Area
There has been pressure for new development in Parbold, most of which has been outside the conservation area. The conservation area covers a large part of Parbold village, which has been essentially fully developed, with very little open land being available except for an area between the railway line, houses on Station Road and the canal. The Bradshaw Lane area is surrounded by open countryside, which currently lies outside the settlement boundary and within the Green Belt. Whilst little pressure exists at present in the future there may be pressure for the sub-division of existing properties, which would increase housing density.
Open spaces within the historic core, and to the rear of properties, are a key feature of the rural character of the canal, and of the area around Bradshaw Lane. New development would have to be considered very carefully if it is not to compromise the character of the area.
Works to Trees in Conservation Areas
Most trees in Conservation Areas are subject to controls which exist to protect this special character. If a tree is not protected by a Preservation Order (TPO), but is within the conservation area, 6 weeks notice must be given in writing to the District Council of an intention to carry out works to trees (pruning or felling) or any root systems. This is often difficult to monitor on private land that covers such a large area. There are no existing Tree Preservation Orders in the conservation area.
The District’s Tree Preservation Orders are currently being reviewed to highlight any changes to the existing Orders and to ensure adequate protection is afforded any important trees and woodland.
The Council is keen to promote good tree management within the conservation area and the Council’s Aboricultural Officer offers advice to owners both indirectly through leaflets and directly with specialist advice.
Environmental Improvements in the Conservation Area
The Appraisal identifies several detracting features within the Conservation Area. Some of these features, and the action required to remedy the situation, are set out below
Detracting Features Action Required Implementation
The cumulative effect of minor Better understanding of The appraisal should become alterations and extensions (inc. architectural designs and the wider adopted by the Council as SPG demolition to buildings, which conservation area and better and be used by Development affect the character and erode control and enforcement where Control. the special character and necessary, appearance of the area. Loss of the historic character. Help and guidance to owners to Through advice from the help them make the best informed Conservation Unit. decisions relating to alterations. Loss of many traditional Raising the awareness of the Look at the current Article 4(2) features to properties such as controls, which exist on listed Direction. Consider a grant traditional styles of buildings and in the conservation scheme to promote the windows/doors. area. replacement of lost features. Modern street lighting and Consider replacement with new Local authority partnership with highway street furniture. columns/lanterns etc of an LCC for replacement lights, appropriate design. subject to funding becoming available. Untidy footpath surface Consider repair/replacement with Through discussion and treatments appropriate materials partnership with the Highway Authority (LCC). Untidy appearance of the Encourage the owners to Through discussions with Stocks Tavern on the corner of adequately maintain the vacant owner. Mill and Alder Lane. building and its car park area. Encourage a new user. Heavy Traffic on A5209 Consider traffic calming/control Through discussion and (Alder Lane) measures partnership with the Highway Authority (LCC). Condition of canal side Enhancement of public areas. Encourage implementation via paths/car park/landscaping partnership scheme with British Waterways. Poor condition/appearance of Produce enhancement scheme for Encourage implementation via Graving Dock. sites reuse/ restoration and/or partnership scheme with British provision of visitor boards. Waterways.
Summary
The Mill Lane Conservation Area is an area of architectural and historic interest, encompassing the traditional centre of Parbold, and representing a key area of industrial development from the early nineteenth century, provided by the canal and the railway.
The Appraisal has also identified one small area, around the railway station, which should be added to the existing conservation area.
APPENDIX A
PRINCIPAL EFFECTS OF CONSERVATION AREA DESIGNATION
By designating a conservation area the Council is confirming that it regards the area as a place where special care should be taken to maintain and improve its visual character. This means that change in a conservation area is subject to greater control than elsewhere, principally:
1. Special attention shall be paid in the exercise of planning functions to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of a conservation area.
2. Conservation Area Consent is required from the Council for the demolition (with some exceptions) of buildings and walls.
3. The Council must be given six weeks notice of any proposal to carry out any work to any tree within the area.
4. Permitted Development Rights (i.e. those building works which do not require planning permission) were removed in Mill Lane by the Council in 1977. The Article 4(1) Direction limits what work you can carry out, to your property, without first applying for planning permission. The restrictions relate to the following aspects of development within the conservation area:
- the enlargement or extension of dwellings including the erection of detached buildings such as garages or stables within the curtilage of the property; - the cladding of the exterior with stone, artificial stone, timber, plastic or tiles; - the erection of any new buildings such as garden sheds with a cubic content greater than 10 cubic metres; - the enlargement of the dwelling by adding to or altering its roof; - the erection of porches outside any external door of the property; - the construction or laying down of hardstanding for vehicles; - the provision of gates, fences, walls or other means of enclosure.
[The legislation relating to permitted Development Rights is complicated and could be subject to change. It is, therefore, advisable to check with the planning authority before carrying out any building works].
PRINCIPAL EFFECTS OF LISTED BUILDING CONTROL
The statutory list of buildings of architectural or historic interest is compiled by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, and includes a wide variety of structures. Inclusion of a building on the list identifies that building as having special interest and brings any alterations to that building under planning control.
There is a general presumption in favour of the preservation of listed buildings because they represent a finite resource. Controls apply to the whole building, both internal and external and to all works which would affect a building’s character. Works of basic maintenance are exempt from control - on a like for like basis, unless there is an element of alteration or rebuilding.
It is a criminal offence to carry out unauthorised alterations to a listed building, so it is always best to consult with the Local Authority to determine whether consent for work to a building is required.
APPENDIX B
LANCASHIRE COUNTY SITES AND MONUMENTS RECORDS
The following features mentioned in the text are recorded as sites of archaeological interest on the Lancashire County Sites and Monuments Record:
Parbold Mill (PRN 822) Signal Box (PRN 18636) Railway Station (PRN 19184) Graving dock (PRN 9442)
Proposals affecting the above sites may therefore meet with a comment from the Lancashire County Archaeology Service, but this will depend on the nature and extent of the proposals.
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20th September 2005
PLANNING COMMITTEE 13th October 2005
Report of: Executive Manager Planning and Development Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor Ian Grant
Contact for further information: I. Bond (Ext: 5167) or C. Griffiths (Ext: 5102)
SUBJECT: CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISALS: HALSALL; MILL LANE PARBOLD; AND ROBY MILL
The following wards are affected. Up Holland, Halsall and Parbold
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To consider the Conservation Area Appraisal for the above Conservation Areas and to report back to Members on the results of the public consultation exercises. To consider any representations and approve the documents.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That subject to no objections from the Planning Committee the attached documents be agreed and published.
2.2 That Cabinet authorise the Executive Manager of Planning and Development Services to make the necessary arrangements to vary the Conservation Area boundaries as indicated on the plans within the appraisal documents and to apply an Article 4(2) Direction to the Conservation Areas indicated in the report.
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO PLANNING COMMITTEE
3.1 That the Committee offers its support for the Conservation Area Appraisals for Halsall, Mill Lane – Parbold and Roby Mill.
4.0 BACKGROUND
4.1 The Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 imposes a duty on local planning authorities to designate as Conservation Areas any “areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance”.
4.2 Government advice, contained in PPG 15, and guidance from English Heritage also sets out the importance of carrying out an appraisal of the special characteristics of a Conservation Area, to justify its status and set its boundaries. The Appraisals can be used to back-up planning application decisions and appeals and to extend planning controls through an Article 4(2) Direction where justified.
4.3 Members will recall the previous commitment to review all of the District’s Conservation Areas and bring forward proposals for New Conservation Areas. At present, Appraisals have been agreed by the Cabinet following the appropriate consultation for 17 of the 28 Conservation Areas.
5.0 CURRENT POSITION
5.1 The consultation process for Roby Mill, Halsall and Mill Lane, Parbold began on the 4th July 2005 by sending a letter and a copy of the proposals to all residents and properties in the Conservation Areas. A copy of the proposals were also sent to the Parish Clerks for each Area.
5.2 Copies of the full appraisal documents were sent to Lancashire County Council (Specialist Advisory Services) and English Heritage, and the Conservation Area Advisory Panel members.
5.3 A press release was published in local newspapers advertising the public exhibitions which were held on 12th July 2005 for Mill Lane, Parbold, on 14th July for Halsall, and on the 18th July for Roby Mill.
5.4 The Consultation period ran until the 25th July to allow representations to made formally in writing to the Council.
6.0 ROBY MILL
6.1 No changes are proposed to the Conservation Area boundary. To maintain the character and appearance of the Area it is important to maintain control over minor changes to properties. In particular the character of terraced cottages are often affected by incremental changes which over time erode the special character and appearance of the street frontage. It is therefore proposed to apply an Article 4(2) Direction across the whole of the Conservation Area.
6.2 It is proposed that the appraisal document should be adopted as Supplementary Planning Guidance in order to provide greater control to prevent the cumulative effect of minor alterations and extensions which erode the special character of the place.
6.3 Possible enhancement schemes include the replacement of modern lighting columns, a grant scheme for the repair / reinstatement of traditional features and improving the appearance of the land to the west of the school, subject to funding becoming available.
6.4 Eleven people attended the public exhibition. Three written comments have been received: Lancashire County Council provided information on sites recorded on the Sites and Monuments Record. The Conservation Area Advisory Panel queried the inclusion of the three bungalows at the north end of the Area at Bank Top especially in relation to their worth compared to the first four bungalows in School Lane. The Lancashire Civic Trust supported the proposals for an Article 4(2) Direction and replacement lighting, providing that this gives white light not orange.
6.5 Taking the comments into account I have included the information from the Sites and Monuments Record as an appendix to the document. I remain of the view that the current boundary is justified by the reasoning that the sites at the north end of Bank Top form a considerable part of the views into the Conservation Area when approached from the north. Not to have the additional controls over these properties may mean changes occur that would adversely impact on the character of the Conservation Area. They also form the end of the settlement and indicate the character change from settlement to wooded landscape. The position of the bungalows in School Lane does not afford them the same potential effect on the Conservation Area and they do not provide the additional boundary relating to a change of character as there is further settlement along the Lane to the east. I therefore propose no change to the current boundary.
7.0 HALSALL
7.1 As part of the review, the buildings south of the current Conservation Area boundary on New Street were identified and considered for inclusion within the Conservation Area. They include Mill House Farm and number 80 and 86 New Street.
7.2 Historic properties within Halsall are relatively spread out and few buildings pre-date the nineteenth century, therefore these properties can be considered to be of historical importance and relate to the development of the village.
7.3 It is proposed to apply an Article 4(2) Direction across the southern part of the Conservation Area, from the junction with Carr Moss to the south including the proposed extension. The distinctive character of the northern part of the village and the sparse nature of the development would limit any benefit gained by imposing an Article 4(2) across the whole area. The Southern area along New Street is characterised by frontage development where minor changes to properties are more noticeable.
7.4 It is proposed that the appraisal document should be adopted as Supplementary Planning Guidance in order to provide greater control to prevent the cumulative effect of minor alterations and extensions which erode the special character of the place.
7.5 Possible enhancement schemes include the replacement of modern lighting columns and inappropriate street furniture, a grant scheme for the repair / reinstatement of traditional features and a grant scheme for tree planting, subject to funding becoming available.
7.6 A total of eighteen people attended the public exhibition. Three written comments have been received: Lancashire County Council provided information on sites recorded on the Sites and Monuments Record. Another comment from a resident was supportive but questioned why the Saracen’s Head and other old buildings in Summerwood Lane / Narrow Lane area had not been considered for inclusion. The Lancashire Civic Trust supported the proposals for an Article 4(2) Direction, extension of the area and street furniture and lighting replacement, providing that the latter gives white light not orange.
7.7 Taking the comments into account I have included the information from the Sites and Monuments Record as an appendix to the document. In relation to the boundary the current Conservation Area relates to the medieval and post medieval settlement. I consider that the character of the Conservation Area would be unduly diluted in quality if the boundary were to be extended to include the buildings of interest in the Summerwood Lane / Narrow Lane area as this area includes a number of buildings of lesser interest and historic value.
8.0 MILL LANE, PARBOLD
8.1 As part of this review, the area to the immediate north of the current conservation area boundary is considered for inclusion in the conservation area. It comprises 2-4 Station Road, the Railway Hotel, the railway station and signal box, the Royal Bank of Scotland building, Post Office and 3 The Common. This significant group of buildings date to the second half of the nineteenth century, and are of historical significance in relation to Parbold’s development in this period.
8.2 Mill Lane Conservation Area includes a high proportion of frontage ‘cottage’ development which are vulnerable to incremental changes involving the loss of traditional features which over time erode the special character and appearance of the streetscene. A degree of minor uncontrolled change has occurred in the Conservation Area over the last 30 years. An Article 4(2) Direction would help manage the changes taking place to ensure the character and appearance of the area is preserved. It is therefore proposed to apply an Article 4(2) Direction across the whole of the Conservation Area including the area of the proposed extension. Controls would be applied to works which alter the fronts of properties including changes to the style of windows and the laying down of hardstanding.
8.3 It is proposed that the appraisal document should be adopted as Supplementary Planning Guidance in order to provide greater control to prevent the cumulative effect of minor alterations and extensions which erode the special character of the place.
8.4 Possible enhancement schemes include a grant scheme for the reinstatement of traditional features and the replacement of modern lighting columns.
8.5 The appearance of the Stocks Tavern was highlighted as a detracting feature. Since the time of writing the Tavern has come under new management and a programme of maintenance and repainting has commenced.
8.6 In total nineteen people attended the public exhibition. Lancashire County Council have provided information on the sites recorded on the Sites and Monuments record. English Heritage has no comment on the appraisal document. West Lancashire Civic Trust support the proposals to extend the Conservation Area and to apply an Article 4(2) Direction. They also support the proposed enhancement works to replace modern street lighting and provide new street furniture. I have also received comments from seven residents. Their comments can be summarised as follows: • Suggest the inclusion of 6-8 Alder Lane within the Conservation Area. • Suggest that Station House and station buildings are included in the review as buildings which make a positive contribution to the area’s character • Two residents question the merit of including the properties in Millfield as part of the Conservation Area • Support shown for the replacement of highway furniture and replacement lighting • The appraisal should highlight the need to ensure that the Windmill Public House is suitably maintained because of its prominence in the Conservation Area • More work should be done to ensure the pavements are suitably repaired / maintained • Concern is expressed over the application of an Article 4(2) Direction and the fact that similar controls are not applied to commercial properties or statutory undertakers • Work should be carried out to protect the traditional hedges and prevent conifer / leylandii from being planted
8.7 In relation to the residents comments I propose the following changes to the appraisal document:
• The addition of Station House and the station buildings to the list of buildings which make a positive contribution to the Conservation Area. • Additional comments to be added relating to the need to replace the railings near the Stocks Tavern and the untidy appearance of the Windmill Public House • To extend the boundary of the Conservation Area to include 6-8 Alder Lane • To include information relating to the Sites and Monuments Record as an appendix to the document
8.8 In respect to the inequitable nature of Article 4(2) Directions, the legislation does not allow these to include non-residential properties as these properties do not have permitted development rights in the same way that residential properties have.
8.9 Millfield is a small discrete cul-de-sac of five non-traditional properties accessed off Mill Lane. The development is not highly visible from Mill Lane and lies largely screened from public view by the properties fronting Mill Lane and Alder Lane. Therefore, whilst the development does not positively contribute to the character and appearance of the area it nevertheless does not impinge or harm the area’s character or appearance. To remove the area from the Conservation Area would therefore serve no real purpose and potentially could lead to changes / alterations / re-development taking place which could harm the Area’s character. I therefore remain of the view that Millfield should remain within the Conservation Area and feel that the boundary to the Conservation Area remain unchanged in this respect.
9.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
9.1 The historic environment has an important role to play in contributing to sustainability in West Lancashire. The appraisal documents evaluate the state of the physical and historical environment and aim to improve the environment and cultural heritage of the wider community
10.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
10.1 The enhancement proposals highlighted within the document are supported by funding under the Conservation Area Enhancement Budget of the capital programme
10.2 There are no financial and resource implications arising from this report.
11.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
11.1 There are no risk assessment issues arising from this report.
Background Documents
The following background documents (as defined in Section 100D (5) of the Local Government Act 1972) have been relied on to a material extent in preparing this Report.
Date Document File Ref
July 2005 Draft Conservation Area Appraisals for Roby Mill, Halsall and Mill Lane, Parbold
Appendices
Roby Mill Draft Conservation Area Appraisal Halsall Draft Conservation Area Appraisal Mill Lane Draft Conservation Area Appraisal
AGENDA ITEM
Cabinet : 20th September 2005
______Report of: Executive Manager Planning/Development Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor Iain Ashcroft
Contact for further information: C. Brady (extn 5125)
SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL PARKING EXEMPTION SCHEMES
District Wide Interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To report back to Cabinet on proposals for the introduction of new Residential Parking Exemption Schemes within the District as outlined in the Cabinet Report of the 24th May 2005.
1.2 To inform Cabinet of the results of the recent survey undertaken on the two existing residents parking schemes.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 The list, as identified in Section 4.1, of additional Residential Parking Exemption Schemes be pursued in conjunction with Lancashire County Council.
2.2 The prioritising/programming of the proposals as identified in Sections 4.6 to 4.9 be approved.
2.3 That a further report be submitted upon completion of the Phase 1 public consultation exercise seeking Cabinet’s views on its findings/implementation proposals.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 An initial report on Residential Parking Exemption Schemes within the District was submitted to Cabinet on 24th May 2005.
3.2 The implementation of Residents’ Parking Exemption Schemes is not a statutory District Council function. Neither is it a statutory function of Lancashire County Council Highway Authority. Lancashire County Council, however, is the relevant body that has the requisite powers needed to agree and authorise all new Residents’ Parking Exemption Schemes and subsequently make the Traffic Regulation Orders required to enforce the schemes.
3.3 It was resolved that: -
• Members approve a joint working initiative on the new residents parking proposals with Lancashire County Council.
• All Members and Portfolio Holders be consulted on areas to be included in possible future Residential Parking Exemption Schemes
• A survey of the existing operational schemes in Dyers Lane and Chapel Street, Ormskirk is carried out.
• A further report be submitted to Cabinet with a full list of proposed residents parking schemes together with a suggested phased implementation programme.
3.4 All proposals for additional Residential Parking Exemption Schemes will require statutory consultation with residents and the public. The current list of proposals is compiled from areas where residents have requested to be included within a designated residents parking scheme.
4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 All Members and Portfolio Holders were consulted with regards to additional areas for inclusion within future Residential Parking Exemption Schemes Programme. After consultation, the final list of suggested proposals, at this stage, is as follows: -
• Station Road, Ormskirk • Hardacre Street, Ormskirk • Scarisbrick Street, Ormskirk • Pennington Avenue, Ormskirk • Churchfields, Ormskirk • Railway Approach, Ormskirk • Burscough Street, Ormskirk • Mill Street, Ormskirk • Bridge Street, Ormskirk • Bridge Avenue, Ormskirk • Queen Street, Ormskirk • Moorgate, Ormskirk • South Terrace, Ormskirk • Aughton Street, Ormskirk • Brook House Farm, Ormskirk • Thompson Avenue, Ormskirk • Hall Brow Close, Ormskirk • Mart Lane, Burscough • Mossfields, Wrightington • Wolverton, Skelmersdale. • Wigan Road, Ormskirk • Small Lane, Ormskirk • Milton Drive
4.2 A survey of all residents, including current permit holders, within the two existing Residents’ Parking Exemption Schemes in Dyers Lane and Chapel Street, Ormskirk was undertaken in July 2005. The results of the survey are marked as Appendix A.
4.3 In assessing the list of proposals with respect to prioritisation of the schemes for consideration it can be seen that in some cases the roads are either located in close proximity or are interconnected and form part of an adjoining residential area network. It is considered therefore that, for the consultation exercise to be effective, dealing with all roads on an individual basis would not give a meaningful overview with respect to traffic management issues within certain specific areas. The impact of any “piecemeal” introductions of new residents parking schemes would have to be considered carefully in order that effective traffic management within the defined areas is not compromised.
4.4 The Aughton Street area, due to its close proximity to Ormskirk Town Centre, suffers to a greater degree with the all day parking of vehicles owned by town centre shop/office workers and visitors to the town centre. This obviously has an impact on the amenity parking of the residents in those affected roads and there have been numerous requests from the residents in those areas, going back a number of years, to address this issue by the implementation of residents parking schemes.
4.5 Taking into account the above and also future enforcement it is suggested that some fourteen of the proposals identified within the Ormskirk area are grouped together to form two distinct areas for consultation purposes. These two areas would be identified as the Aughton Street area and the Burscough Street area and would be prioritised to be taken forward in years 1 and 2, in that order.
4.6 Phase 1, the Aughton Street area, would consist of the following roads: -
• Bridge Street, Ormskirk • Bridge Avenue, Ormskirk • Queen Street, Ormskirk • Moorgate, Ormskirk • South Terrace, Ormskirk • Aughton Street, Ormskirk • Brook House Farm, Ormskirk • Small Lane, Ormskirk
4.7 Phase 2, the Burscough Street area, would consist of the following roads: -
• Station Road, Ormskirk • Hardacre Street, Ormskirk • Scarisbrick Street, Ormskirk • Pennington Avenue, Ormskirk • Railway Approach, Ormskirk • Burscough Street, Ormskirk
4.8 Phase 3 would consist of the following roads: -
• Thompson Avenue, Ormskirk • Hall Brow Close, Ormskirk • Wigan Road, Ormskirk • Mill Street, Ormskirk
4.9 Phase 4 would consist of the following roads: -
• Mossfields, Wrightington • Churchfields, Ormskirk • Mart Lane, Burscough • Milton Drive, Ormskirk
4.10 Also there are considerable problems associated with the all day parking of vehicles in Wolverton, Skelmersdale from the adjoining British Telecom training facility. The resolution of this has been the subject of an ongoing campaign by residents in Wolverton and the issue has recently been part way addressed by Lancashire County Council’s recent introduction of waiting restrictions at the junction of High Street and Wolverton. In order to fully address the problem then the introduction of a residents only parking scheme needs to be considered. Wolverton is therefore recognised to be a high priority for consideration and it is recommended that this scheme be given consideration within the first phase of proposals.
4.11 Phase 1 of the proposals would therefore consist of Wolverton and the Aughton Street Area, as previously identified.
5.0 TIMESCALES
5.1 It is difficult at this stage, without knowing the outcome of any future consultation exercise, to suggest realistic timescales for the implementation stage of the process. Given a positive response from the consultation exercise, however, then it would be reasonable to assume that Phase 1 of the proposals could be implemented by August 2006. Phase 2 of the proposals would then follow for implementation in August 2007.
5.2 The subsequent timescales for implementation of the remaining schemes would be Phase 3 – August 2008 and Phase 4 – August 2009.
5.3 The phasing programme as contained within this report will need to be kept under constant review and adjusted as necessary dependent on the outcome of the public consultations.
6.0 RESOURCES
6.1 Lancashire County Council have been informed of the draft list of proposals and have suggested that they would possibly be able to resource the taking forward of up to two proposals in any year. They have as a rule in the past placed a priority on schemes, which have traffic management implications rather than those having amenity value only.
6.2 Lancashire County Council have suggested that, in principle, the schemes should be self-financing and the costs in association with the consultation exercise should be recoverable from the subsequent charges made for the residents parking permits issued.
6.3 The consultation exercise is the “resource hungry” section of any future proposals. As Lancashire County Council have agreed to be responsible for this area of work then engineering input from the Divisions Technical Services Section will be minimal and can be resourced by utilising existing staff within the section.
6.4 The phasing of the scheme as identified in this report needs to be approved by Lancashire County Council. We are at present awaiting reaffirmation from Lancashire County Council of their decision to support us in this programme of works by providing the necessary resources as previously agreed. No response has been received to this matter to-date. The response will be reported orally by the Executive Manager for Planning and Development Services.
7.0 PROPOSALS
7.1 Members agree the list as detailed in Section 4.1 as a complete list of proposals to be included and taken forward within the proposed Residential Parking Exemption Schemes Programme.
7.2 Members agree the prioritisation/programming of the proposals as outlined in Section 4 above.
7.3 Lancashire County Council be requested to carry out a consultation exercise covering all roads identified in the above Phase 1 designated Aughton Street Zone and programme the remaining outstanding roads to be undertaken in consecutive years.
7.4 The findings of all consultations be reported back, upon completion, to Cabinet in order to agree timescales for a proposed implementation programme.
8.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
8.1 The introduction of residents’ parking measures will contribute to reducing the overall environmental impact of the car in local residential areas.
8.2 The Local Transport Plan identifies important measures to improve accessibility to public transport together with improvements, which will increase the attractiveness of cycling and walking as a sustainable alternative in line with Council environmental policy objectives. The implementation of Residents Parking Schemes may encourage existing commuters to seek other forms of transport which can only improve both environmental and traffic management issues in the surrounding areas.
8.3 Freeing the roads in question from “strangers” vehicles would highlight the parking of any unfamiliar vehicles, having a positive effect on Crime and Disorder within designated residents parking areas.
9.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
9.1 To expand and enhance the existing Residential Parking Exemption Schemes it will be necessary to identify funding for the increased costs of physical measures, enforcement and administration. Any such costs can only be determined upon completion of the relevant consultation exercises, which will determine the extent of any agreed schemes, but would only be for new carriageway lining and signing works and issuing of residents parking permits.
9.2 Lancashire County Council have suggested that, in principle, any new schemes should be self-financing and that both the County Council’s costs in association with the consultation exercise and the District Council’s costs in association with other elements of the schemes should be recoverable from the charges made for issuing new residents parking permits.
9.3 The numbers of Parking Attendants required under the Decriminalisation of Parking were determined based on the Traffic Regulation Orders in force at the time. As the introduction of any additional residents parking schemes will increase the number of current operational Traffic Regulation Orders within the District then this coupled with the subsequent increased level of enforcement required, particularly in any areas outside of Ormskirk Town Centre, may require an increase in the current numbers of Parking Attendants to ensure effective enforcement of any new schemes.
9.4 Only upon completion of the phase 1 consultation exercise will proposals for changes to the current permit charge be able to be determined and reported back to Cabinet.
10 RISK ASSESSMENT
10.1 There are limited financial risks to the Council is accepting the recommendations in that funds may be committed to design and feasibility work for projects which the Council may not be able to implement due to technical reasons. There are also risks in connection with the public relation aspect to any scheme in that despite consultation there may be local disagreement on the proposals and/or their prioritisation.
10.2 The risks in not accepting the recommendations are the Council is not seen to be taking the lead on an issue which is important to local communities.
Background Documents
There are no background documents. (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices:
Appendix 1 : Survey results from current schemes.
APPENDIX 1
SUMMARY OF CHAPEL DYERS TOTAL SURVEY RESULTS STREET LANE
Current Permits Issued (Visitor permits 47 33 80 included)
Survey forms issued 49 28 77
Completed survey forms returned 22 14 36
Too many permits? 4 2 6
Do you consider that Not enough permits? 1 3 4 there are :
Just about the right 17 9 26 No of Permits?
Will you be Yes 19 12 31 renewing your permit(s) when the current annual scheme No 3 2 5 is due for renewal at the 35 52 end of January If renewing – how 17 (no (increase (increase 2006? many permits? change) of 8) of 8)
Retaining the existing system of 16 10 26 schemes set up for If the scheme individual roads was extended within Ormskirk would you be in The introduction of favour of : ‘home parking 3 2 5 zones’ covering several roads
Are you Yes 16 8 24 satisfied with the administration / enforcement of the scheme in No 6 4 10 its present form?
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20th September 2005
PLANNING COMMITTEE 13th October 2005
______Report of: Executive Manager Planning and Development Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor I Grant
Contact for further information: Duncan Slater (Extn. 5168)
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RED SQUIRREL REFUGE AND BUFFER ZONE
The following wards are affected: Aughton, Downholland, Great Altcar, Halsall, North Meols and Scarisbrick
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To seek adoption of the Sefton Coast Red Squirrel Refuge and Buffer Zone strategy by West Lancashire District Council, as proposed by the UK Red Squirrel Group.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That the Council adopts the Red Squirrel Refuge and Buffer Zone strategy, in support of the efforts being made to ensure the survival of red squirrels in the North West.
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO PLANNING COMMITTEE
3.1 That the Planning Committee take into account the requirements of the Red Squirrel Refuge and Buffer Zone strategy when considering planning applications, in support of the efforts being made to ensure the survival of red squirrels in the North West.
4.0 BACKGROUND
4.1 The red squirrel (Scirius vulgaris) is a Priority Species for conservation in the U.K.’s Biodiversity Action Plan. The population of red squirrels is in rapid decline, due to the spread of non-native grey squirrels, habitat fragmentation and disease.
4.2 Of the small populations of red squirrels remaining in mainland England, it is estimated that over 1,000 reds out of a total of 16,000 nationally, live within the pine woodland of the Sefton Coast. This makes this colony, based around Formby, of national significance, and it has been identified by the U.K. Red Squirrel Group (who have the responsibility of implementing the U.K. Biodiversity Action Plan for red squirrels) as one of 16 potential refuge sites in mainland England.
4.3 The red squirrel Refuge and Buffer Zones would be non-statutory designations. The main aim of their designation is to gain funding for agricultural and woodland practices from external agencies (such as DEFRA, English Nature etc) that would conserve red squirrel populations within each refuge. For West Lancashire District Council, its implications would be that planning guidance to landowners within the defined Buffer Zone area should include reference to red squirrel conservation measures. This would most commonly mean where development and land-use changes involved measures such as tree planting, advice would be given as to designs that did not encourage grey squirrels into the Buffer Zone environment.
5.0 ISSUES
5.1 The proposed refuge and buffer zone would include the western side of West Lancashire District in the buffer zone. Inside this zone land management practices outlined in the strategy document would be encouraged by the U.K. Red Squirrel Group. The strategy is given as Appendix 1 to this report, and the map of the proposed refuge and buffer zone is given as Appendix 2.
5.2 For WLDC as a local planning authority, the only action required is control on what trees are planted as part of development proposals in the buffer zone, in order to discourage colonisation of grey squirrels within the zone, or movement of greys through the zone. This would require the restriction as to which types of trees could be planted in new landscaping schemes. The planting of large-fruiting trees, such as oak, chestnut and beech would be discouraged, and potentially landscaping schemes that included those species could be refused.
5.3 Within the buffer zone lie significant old tree plantings that include large- fruiting trees. Of particular note are Scarisbrick Hall Estate, and the woodlands within the village of Halsall, which are of high historic and landscape importance. Scarisbrick Hall Estate is the only listed historic park within West Lancashire District. These woodlands are also subject to Tree Preservation Orders, which gives WLDC some control over their maintenance, management and re-planting. As adoption of the red squirrel refuge and buffer zone strategy is non-statutory, this allows WLDC discretion in allowing the same large-fruiting trees to be replanted in these woodlands, to allow for historic continuity of these plantings.
5.4 Similarly, there are several individually protected oak trees within the buffer zone. The strategy is not seeking to encourage the removal of established trees, and WLDC would not promote the removal of large-fruiting trees in the buffer zone if they are of public amenity in other respects (historic value, wildlife value, landscape value). If such an individual died and/or needed to be replaced, WLDC would still be able to specify that another oak is planted in replacement.
5.5 The Buffer Zone areas within West Lancashire District, being mainly intensively farmed mossland, act as a barrier to the grey squirrels because of their openness. There are few hedges, and only scattered woodland groups, particularly in areas at the western edge of the district, along its boundary with Sefton. The proposed strategy would require WLDC not to promote afforestation (planting of trees on land) within the buffer zone, unless it was for the express purpose of supporting a red squirrel population. Similarly, the planting of hedges, which could act as corridors for grey squirrels, would be discouraged.
5.6 There are, therefore, some issues in relation to landscape character and potential for change that are implicated in the adoption of the strategy. The continuation of historic woodland features is not precluded. However, the creation of new areas of planting, for either scenic, screening or wildlife purposes, would be restricted if the strategy was always adhered to. Because it is non-statutory, WLDC would not have to adhere to the strategy if other factors, (such as the screening of an unsightly view by means of tree planting) were considered of greater importance. The loss of potential planting needs to be balanced with the particular landscape character of these intensively farmed mosslands, where the flat openness of the land is the strongest distinctive feature, and which extensive tree or hedge planting would adversely affect.
5.7 The proposals by the UK Red Squirrel Group include grey squirrel control measures (primarily trapping) within the buffer zone. Grey squirrels are classed as a vermin species in Great Britain, being non-native and causing significant economic damage to forestry crops in this country. There are no proposals at this time for WLDC to be actively involved in this element of the proposals. WLDC would only act as a sign-post in this respect, directing landowners to Red Alert, Lancashire Wildlife Trust and the U.K. Red Squirrel Group if that was considered appropriate due to the nature of the enquiry.
6.0 PROPOSALS
6.1 That WLDC support the designation of the proposed Red Squirrel Refuge and Buffer Zone strategy, and that it is formally adopted.
7.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
7.1 The conservation of red squirrels is a national programme that excites and interests the general public, as well as being a high priority for national agencies such as the Forestry Commission, DEFRA and English Nature. Red squirrel populations within West Lancashire have only recently dwindled, and there is generally much public support for the preservation of this native species. The adoption of this strategy is one means whereby WLDC can support this national programme in its efforts.
8.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
8.1 There are no direct financial or resource implications to WLDC in adopting the proposal. Any detailed planning guidance on red squirrel conservation given to applicants within the buffer zone would be given by Red Alert North West, the U.K. Red Squirrel Group or the Lancashire Wildlife Trust. WLDC would assess planning applications, and comment on landscaping schemes, as before, but would include considerations regarding red squirrel habitat and discouragement of grey squirrels.
8.2 WLDC may be in a position to provide greater support should that be considered appropriate, and such further support would be likely to have financial implications.
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
9.1 That WLDC can assist an important national conservation programme by adopting the Sefton Coast Red Squirrel Refuge and Buffer Zone strategy. This has some implications as to the future development of the buffer zone, in that it would discourage further tree planting by land owners unless for overriding needs (such as industrial screening) or the creation of habitat for red squirrels.
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS
There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Proposal to establish a red squirrel refuge in the Sefton Coast Woodlands and a buffer zone in areas of Sefton and West Lancashire
Appendix 2: Map: Sefton Coast Red Squirrel Refuge and Buffer Zone, as proposed
Appendix 3: Map: Location of potential Red Squirrel Reserves and 5km buffer zones in Northern England
Appendix 4: Red Alert North England Press Release
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET
20 SEPEMBER 2005
______Report of: Executive Manager Housing Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor D Westley
Contact for further information: Steve Jones (Extn. 5208) Laura Gee (Extn. 716805)
SUBJECT: COUNCIL HOUSING ALLOCATIONS SCHEME
RVL/SAJ/EH/BC/2660cab 31 August 2005
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To advise Cabinet of the results of Member and Stakeholder consultation on the existing Council Housing Allocation Policy.
1.2 To recommend changes and seek Cabinet’s approval to a revised Policy as a result of the consultation.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 That Cabinet consider the schedule of suggested changes to the existing Council Housing Allocation Policy as set out in Appendix A.
2.2 That Cabinet approve the two categories of changes marked I & II in Appendix A to be reflected in the updated Allocations Policy with effect from 1 January 2006
2.3 That Cabinet advise on the further work required in respect of changes marked III in Appendix A.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 Members will recall that a report on this matter was considered at your meeting dated 12 July 2005. It was agreed that consultation be undertaken to inform an updated Allocations Policy.
3.2 Consultation with key stakeholders and all Council Members was undertaken on 1st and 6th September respectively to provide a broad range of feedback on the existing Policy for Cabinet to consider and make changes as appropriate.
3.3 The consultation was completed to this timescale to maximise attendance out of the main holiday period.
3.4 The sessions were conducted on an informal and open basis and explored a range of issues around the application of the current Policy and what changes would be beneficial and appropriate to make. As Members will appreciate there is a diverse range of views on this matter.
4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 The existing Policy was introduced in October 2003 and has been operating well from that date. However, it is good practice to review the Policy on a regular basis.
4.2 The consultation events identified a number of issues for Cabinet to consider and these are shown at Appendix A. They have been divided into three categories:
I Fundamental changes (due to Statutory or Legal guidance) II Good Practice changes (compliance with standard national directives) III Suggested improvements (specific views on application of the Policy in the District)
5.0 ISSUES
5.1 Items in Category I and II meet legislation and good practise and are therefore recommended to you.
5.2 Those issues identified in Category III have varying impacts on the Policy. At this stage it is important to seek a steer from Cabinet on which of these matters should be further analysed to assess the impact they would have across the District.
5.3 Members will be mindful also that changes to the Allocations Policy will be reflected in our development work with Housing Associations. The Council nominates individuals to new build Housing Association Schemes from the Housing Register and those individuals are assessed on the basis of the approved Allocations Policy.
6.0 PROPOSALS
6.1 The changes shown in Category I and II at Appendix A are necessary to bring the Policy up to date.
6.2 Cabinet’s views on the further work required and on which issues identified in Category III would be beneficial to aid further analysis.
7.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
7.1 These changes will ensure we can sustain balanced communities and ensure equity of access to Council housing across the District.
8.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
8.1 The existing guidance material will need to be updated prior to January 2006 and the costs of this work can be met from the 2005/2006 General Revenue Account (Housing) provision.
9.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
9.1 As indicated previously some element of the Policy require change to ensure that the Council is not at risk of challenge on legal or accepted good practice grounds.
Background Documents The following background documents (as defined in Section 100D (5) of the Local Government Act 1972) have been relied on to a material extent in preparing this Report.
Date Document File Ref 12 July Cabinet Report
Appendix
Appendix A Review of Member and key Stakeholder Sessions (to follow after Consultation Event)
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20th September 2005
______Report of: Executive Manager – Regeneration and Property
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Cllr Ian Grant
Contact for further information: Steve Bretherton (Extn. 2623)
SUBJECT: WEST LANCASHIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY AND LSP EXTERNAL FUNDING STRATEGY
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To notify Cabinet Members of the completion of two key strategic framework documents, namely the Council’s ten-year Regeneration Strategy, and the LSP/WLDC’s associated three-year rolling External Funding Strategy, and to seek their views on the content of each document.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 Members are recommended:
(1) to approve the Council’s Regeneration Strategy, and associated LSP/WLDC External Funding Strategy; and (2) to note that both Strategies will be submitted to the Local Strategic Partnership in November 2005 for endorsement
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 The Regeneration and Property Division, on behalf of the Council and the Local Strategic Partnership, has developed two key framework strategies designed to both underpin the delivery of the Council’s District-wide regeneration agenda and support the Local Strategic Partnership’s key priorities as set out in the Community Strategy.
3.2 Both documents have been developed following extensive consultation with key local partners and community stakeholders during the past 18-months and have sought to reflect the important local priority actions which both the Council and LSP need to implement in the coming months and years in order to maximise the District’s potential as an attractive place to live, work and invest.
3.3 The Regeneration Strategy identifies a range of priority projects and initiatives that are to be developed in the coming years across the three major geographical areas of the District, covering Skelmersdale/Upholland, Ormskirk/Burscough and the Rural Parishes. The Strategy sets out the specific social, economic and environmental needs of these communities which the various investment proposals are seeking to address and aims to provide a cohesive regeneration blueprint for the District as a whole. This will be critical if West Lancashire is to build on its achievements to-date in attracting substantial private and public sector investment, as well as continuing to develop strong and sustainable communities.
3.4 The External Funding Strategy has been developed in response to the need for all LSP partners and stakeholder organisations (including the Council) to adopt a more strategic approach to external funding in order to ensure that the key social- economic-environmental targets identified within the Community Strategy (and related local strategies) are achieved using funding that is successfully procured, where necessary, from specifically-targeted external sources. This will also enable the LSP to become a more effective platform for the development and delivery of important local initiatives across all eight thematic areas.
4.0 ISSUES
4.1 Many of the initiatives that aim to deliver the Regeneration Strategy will be funded from mainstream funding sources. However, some of the ‘cross-cutting’ and strategic projects will require additional funding to implement, and thereby maximise their chances of success and sustainability. Hence, the Regeneration Strategy will be directly supported by the External Funding Strategy aimed at maximising the opportunities for securing additional investment to enable key projects to be implemented.
4.2 The District has, during the past few years, been extremely successful in securing external funding from a range of national and European programmes and the LSP aims to ensure that both the current funding programmes, and new areas of funding in the future, have maximum impact on the regeneration of West Lancashire. A key factor will be the flexibility of partners to develop a culture of collective project ownership and shared funding knowledge and experience throughout the LSP, both in tackling new and innovative approaches, as well as stimulate a wider involvement of all stakeholders (in particular the private sector, VSF network, environmental bodies and other under-represented groups) in the development of key policy/project initiatives and the targeting of (and lobbying for) externally-funded investments and delivery-support.
5.0 PROPOSALS
5.1 In order to assist Cabinet Members when considering the focus and objectives of the proposed frameworks, there follows a summary of the main components identified within the respective Action Plans of each strategy.
5.2 Regeneration Strategy – Main Components
• Skelmersdale/Upholland – key strategic projects include the visioning and masterplan for Skelmersdale Town Centre, the re-modelling of both the industrial and residential estates, the creation of a sub-regional centre for culture and sport and the creation of a technology park at Junction 4 of the M58.
• Ormskirk/Burscough – key strategic projects include the Market Towns initiative, the re-modelling of the industrial estates and improvements to the Leeds-Liverpool canal corridor and Burscough Wharf project.
• Rural Parishes – key strategic projects include a Rural Study and Forward Strategy, a Tourism Study and Forward Strategy, the Vital Villages initiative, Leeds-Liverpool canal and marina and the proposed Ribble Estuary Regional Park.
5.3 External Funding Strategy – Main Components
• To deliver the four ‘funding objectives’ set out in the Regeneration Strategy, namely to develop appropriate processes and procedures required to optimise external funding opportunities, to improve and develop partnerships in order to better co-ordinate and optimise external funding opportunities, to improve and develop communication links with those LSP partners involved in external funding and to develop better systems for tracking policy developments and disseminating/exchanging information and best practice.
• To explore new and sustainable methodologies for identifying and releasing funding from the mainstream/core budgets of all partner organisations in order to better align these resources to the LSP priorities and increase the capacity of the LSP to generate and apply critical levels of match-funding and other essential resources when required.
• To establish tangible and effective relationships with key funding providers and organisations within the principal regeneration-policy arenas of Europe, UK Government, National Lottery, the Grant-Making Trusts and successful Community Development Finance Initiatives (CDFIs), where appropriate, as well as ensure that the LSP’s ‘voice’ is heard within key sub-regional networks and affiliations (both at officer and political levels), such as the NWDA and Lancashire Partnership.
• To create a clear and concise LSP-wide bidding database (linked to the current thematic action plans) in order to track all ongoing external funding bids throughout the partnership which make a direct contribution to the Community Strategy’s current aims, objectives and/or targets, and to engage with each Thematic Group (TG) to identify and map those current funding opportunities which are considered most appropriate to the LSP’s target activities/projects (including addressing current ‘activity gaps’ ) and to develop suitable action plans to secure these funds (NB : this will both assist the TGs in demonstrating and measuring their ‘added-value’ to the Partnership and inform the new Performance Management Group of ongoing achievements and methodologies).
• To create a distinctive, informal External Funding Forum (EFF) as a ‘think-tank- cum-debating-body’ for the collective dissemination and formulation of new ideas and solutions to local funding issues, achieved through open, critical debate among all partners (and involving experienced and influential outside bodies/individuals) regarding future funding strategies, the exploration of new funding opportunities/ideas and innovative approaches to accessing various funding routes etc.
• To enhance the role of the District Council’s established Funded-Programmes Team (to be re-named the External Funding Unit (EFU)) as a pivotal resource in the delivery of the External Funding Strategy (EFS), both as a practical support facility for the Thematic Groups, and through day-to-day collaboration with external funding professionals in all partner organisations (NB: this will be a critical component in providing the enhanced LSP Executive Group with the latest external funding intelligence to maximise its greater strategic and decision-making role).
6.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
6.1 It is hoped that both the Regeneration and External Funding strategies will make an effective contribution towards the delivery of the LSP’s agreed aims and objectives, particularly within areas of the Community Strategy where greater project development and funding support is currently required. The fundamental aim of both strategies is to provide the Council and LSP with a range of integrated actions designed to support local partners in tackling some of the major social, economic and environmental issues facing the district both now and in the future.
6.2 The implementation of the Regeneration Action Plans and the delivery of projects will be the responsibility of all key stakeholders who make up the Local Strategic Partnership. Many of the projects that require the bending of mainstream resources will be delivered through the individual service plans of the service provider. However, the Local Strategic Partnership, through the Executive Group, will monitor the key projects, i.e. those which have maximum social, economic and environmental impact, and these will be directed either through the LSP’s eight Thematic Groups, or through specific cross-funding teams that are created to deliver the project.
7.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
7.1 Neither the Regeneration Strategy nor the External Funding Strategy, as framework documents, present any direct resource implications for the Council. However, the delivery of the former’s Action Plan, and elements of the latter’s Action Plan (eg. the development of a dedicated external funding website), will require a detailed, project-by-project financial appraisals of the likely capital and/or revenue cost implications to the Council, and these will be reported in-turn to Cabinet at the appropriate time in accordance with standing orders and other governance provisions.
8. RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1 Both Action Plans include an initial outline risk assessment of each proposed project or activity. More fundamental risk analyses will be undertaken during the design and development of each proposal, as part of the overall financial management and planning procedures required by each initiative. In each case, the potential risk(s) to the Council will be either minimal or negligible.
9.0 CONCLUSION
9.1 The Regeneration Strategy, and the complementary External Funding Strategy, provides a significant, District-wide blueprint for the sustainable social, economic and environmental prosperity of all communities who live and work in West Lancashire, and sets out a strategic vision and action plan designed to preserve and enhance the District’s important place in an increasingly competitive and challenging economic environment.
Background Documents The following background documents (as defined in Section 100D (5) of the Local Government Act 1972) have been relied on to a material extent in preparing this Report.
Date Document File Ref
West Lancashire District Council Regeneration Strategy “West Lancashire Matters” 2006-2015 (Final Draft)
“Putting West Lancashire First” – An External Funding Strategy for the District of West Lancashire 2006-2008, prepared by WLDC on behalf of the LSP (Final Draft)
AGENDA ITEM: 1
CABINET: 9th September 2005
______Report of: Executive Manager Regeneration & Property
Contact for further information: Heather L. McManus, MRICS (Extn 2610)
SUBJECT: SKELMERSDALE TOWN CENTRE VISION DOCUMENT
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To inform Members of the recent work carried out to develop a vision for Skelmersdale Town Centre and to seek subsequent endorsement of this document.
1.2 To seek Member approval to select a Developer Partner for the Town Centre through the European procurement process (OJEU). (A further report will be brought to Members to seek appointment of a suitable partner).
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 That the West Lancashire District Council adopt the Vision Document for Skelmersdale town centre and agree to proceed with the delivery mechanism detailed in 4.2 of this report.
2.2 That Members give Delegated Authority to the Executive Manager Regeneration & Property and Executive Manager (Financial Services) to accept any grant monies offered through Investing in Business to facilitate further Appraisal work.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 Members will recall that during the last twelve months Broadway Malyan have been carrying out a study to set a feasibility vision for Skelmersdale Town Centre. Lengthy consultation exercises have been carried out with the public and private sectors and a draft Vision was reported to the Local Strategic Partnership on 20th May 2005.
3.2 Following further discussions and consultation events, feedback has now been received and a final version of the Vision document has now been produced for endorsement. The Local Strategic Partnership will receive a report on this matter on the 9th September 2005, and a verbal update to this meeting will be given to Members at Cabinet.
4.0 PROPOSALS
4.1 The attached Vision is now recommended to be adopted by the Local Strategic Partnership, whereupon it is proposed that the stakeholder partners would proceed to put in place the necessary framework to begin delivery of the Vision document.
4.2 The framework for this is that the key stakeholders will seek a Developer Partner for Skelmersdale. An advert is to be placed in the OJEU (Official Journal of the European Union) following necessary procedures and processes. A developer/financial partner who will be selected will then work with the stakeholders in the delivery of a SPD for Skelmersdale town centre. It is proposed that in moving straight to delivery through the planning development framework process, this will ensure that the community aspirations and commercial realities will be sufficiently taken into account to produce deliverable schemes on site.
4.3 As soon as the developer partner is appointed, a further detailed consultation exercise will be carried out regarding the detail if the development proposals with the public and private sector partners.
5.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
5.1 The delivery of a Vision for Skelmersdale Town Centre will address all of the social, economic and environmental issues that have been raised by the LSP through the Community Strategy.
6.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
6.1 The Vision document produced has been financed through funding partner English Partnership. Further funding will be required to carry out the appraisal work needed to select a developer partner and a bid has been forwarded by West Lancashire District Council to the Investment in Business Programme to facilitate this.
6.2 The work required to secure a Developer Partner will be met from existing resources.
7.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
7.1 In order to proceed to a position whereby we have a deliverable development framework document for Skelmersdale, the Vision must be set, and a Developer Partner must be appointed at the earliest opportunity.
Background Documents There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20th September 2005
______Report of: Executive Manager Regeneration and Property
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Cllr Ian Grant
Contact for further information: Jonathan Noad (Extn. 2607)
SUBJECT: REGIONAL ECONOMIC STRATEGY REVIEW
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To inform members of the content of the Regional Economic Strategy Review
1.2 To seek members views of the draft version of the Regional Economic Strategy Review.
1.3 To authorise the Council’s response to the North West Regional Development Agency
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 That a copy of this report together with any further comments from members be sent to the North West Regional Development Agency as the Council’s formal response to the consultation.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 The Regional Economic Strategy (RES) is the region’s rolling 20 year strategy to shape the future economic direction of the Northwest, with a particular focus on activities in the next three years. The North West Regional Development Agency (NWDA) leads the development of the strategy on behalf of the region. At the heart of the RES lies the concept of achieving sustainable development. The RES is therefore of central importance to a whole range of other policies for the region influencing for example housing, transport and planning policies through the Regional Housing Strategy and Regional Spatial Strategy.
3.2 The RES is underpinned by a substantial evidence base, including specifically commissioned research. Regeneris Consulting have produced an economic analysis and Sustainability Northwest have produced an environmental & social analysis of the region. In this way all aspects of sustainable development have been examined. In addition the Regional Economic Forecasting Panel has produced economic forecasts for the region.
3.3 The Northwest is a £98bn economy with approximately 6.8m people and 230,000 firms. It is a large area and the population and economy of the Northwest are very diverse. It has historically under-performed the UK economy. However, in recent years (2000-2003) the Northwest has been growing faster than England – for example:
• 18% GVA growth (16% in England) • 5% growth in number of firms (3% in England) • 5% growth in number of employees (2% in England) • 3% growth in employment rate (0% in England)
3.4 In the last 4 years the Northwest has created a net additional 150,000 new jobs, but many of these have been low paid, often part time jobs. The Gross Value Added (GVA or output) per head of the Northwest is still 12% lower than that in England – resulting in an output gap of £13bn. . 4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 The Region already has a RES in place which was adopted in 2003. It is the intention of the NWDA to have a reviewed RES in place by 2006 which will be again reviewed in 2009 on a rolling three year basis.
4.2 A Draft Review of RES has now been published for consultation over a three month period with all responses required by the end of September 2005. The Reviewed RES will be submitted to Government by the end of the year. Following ministerial consideration the new RES will be launched in Spring 2006.
5.0 ISSUES
5.1 The draft RES sets out an overall vision for the region with some suggested success factors, together with an overall economic strategy. It then analyses the economy under 5 chapters – business, skills and employment, regeneration, infrastructure and quality of life. Each chapter sets out what is trying to be achieved (aim), the current position (context) and those things needed to achieve the aim (activities). The activities fall into those needed to achieve ongoing incremental economic growth and those which are vital for the Northwest to focus effort on, in order to achieve the transformation or step change in the economy. Finally each chapter sets out key indicators and targets and key social & environmental benefits of the proposed activities. .
5.2 The overall vision for the RES Review is to “transform England’s Northwest through sustainable economic development into a competitive, high added value, knowledge based inclusive economy”. This is to be achieved through:
• Raising the output of our businesses and the productivity of our workers (measured by GVA & GVA/head, by sector) • Creating more & better jobs (measured by job creation, split into full time, part time and high value added jobs) • Ensuring Northwest people have the skills for life (measured by qualification levels especially those without qualifications and Level 4 qualifications) • Enabling people to access work (measured by worklessness and employment rates, including for disadvantaged groups) • Helping disadvantaged communities (measured by the number of local authority districts in worst 5% Index of Deprivation) • Reducing variations across the region (measured by sub-regional average wage levels and average gross household income).
5.3 A summary of how the RES will deliver the overall vision is attached as Appendix A.
6.0 VIEWS OF THE EXECUTIVE MANAGER REGENERATION AND PROPERTY
6.1 Detailed below are the initial views of the Council on the draft RES Review. These views have been discussed with colleagues in the Planning and Development Services and Housing to ensure the response is consistent with Regional Spatial Strategy, Lancashire Structure Plan, West Lancashire Local Plan, and Regional Housing Strategy.
6.2 We welcome the content of the draft RES which addresses many of the sectors and issues that are of concern in the region, sub region and locally. We particularly welcome the inclusion of worklessness as a key issue facing the RES. This is certainly an issue we as a District need to look at especially within Skelmersdale.
6.3 We would wish to see Skelmersdale highlighted as one of the key areas which needs to be addressed. Skelmersdale is one of 42 priorities for Sustainable Communities nationally and is given such status in RPG and Structure Plan. Furthermore Skelmersdale is highlighted as a strategic priority in the Regional Housing Strategy 2005. The draft RES mentions Barrow as one of these but has missed out Skelmersdale from this (page 19). We feel this is of vital importance for the town where significant investment is still required to allow it to grow to its full potential. RES needs to be consistent with the other regional strategies in this respect.
6.4 Connectivity and Growth Areas – the M58 corridor has been ignored. This has great potential and is also characterised as being an area where multiple deprivation exists leading from Skelmersdale, through Kirkby and into inner Liverpool. This corridor has as much potential as the M62 and M56 corridors and is also an area in need of regeneration. We also consider that the District has a significant roll to play in delivering linkages between the three city regions including the Preston to Liverpool and Wigan to Southport rail lines and main A road links. The importance of the Ormskirk By Pass is crucial to achieving better links between the city regions.
6.5 Skills and Employment – there are a number of hotspots in Skelmersdale wards where there are a lack of qualifications – we feel this area should be given as much weight as those listed on page 15 of the Draft RES.
6.6 Infrastructure – the RES highlights the need to address connectivity to Liverpool and Manchester. We consider that the line from Preston through Burscough and Ormskirk would benefit from upgrading to electrification and regular services. This would provide significant improvement in connectivity within the region. The reintroduction of the Burscough curves would also allow for development of services from Preston and Ormskirk to Southport. We also consider that there is a significant opportunity for rail freight on the Wigan to Kirby line adjacent to Pimbo Industrial Estate in Skelmersdale.
6.7 Quality of Life – the RES highlights the need to nurture and promote the area as a place to live, work visit and invest. It is essential to do this that funds are made available for marketing activity. The Regional Parks will be able to contribute greatly to this but have been ignored from the Draft RES. The Ribble Estuary is one such emerging Regional Park and needs to be given status in the RES (along with then others). The Ribble Estuary Regional Park is a key project for the Central Lancs. City Region and also would have benefits for the Merseyside City Region.
6.8 We also consider the RES could clarify how the Northern Way and City Region process impacts on the RES (and visa versa). It is also considered that the draft is weak on rural issues and tourism issues. If these are being dealt with explicitly in RES then it should be made clear where they are being dealt.
6.9 The RES does not show structures of Regional and Sub Regional delivery – this needs very clear clarification. Needs to clarify delivery arrangements (relationships between SRPs, LSPs, Lancashire Economic Partnership etc.) particularly at local level. RES needs to address how better alignment of numerous sub-regional strategies will be achieved, particularly in the case of little-known and emerging developments such as the Regional Rural Delivery Framework, Regional Health Investment Plan etc.
6.10 Clarification is required on whether ‘local authority districts in the worst 5% Index of Deprivation’ (2004) actually means ‘wards’ (particularly as RES recognises ‘pockets of deprivation’). Although the RES is focussed largely on ‘spatial definitions’ of the region’s priorities, it should address in more detail different factors/characteristics in different areas which play different roles in achieving regional economic growth, such as Skelmersdale which has specific problems but is located in a prosperous district.
6.11 Addressing ‘sectoral change’ away from manufacturing and towards services should not be to the detriment of manufacturing, particularly in growth sectors.
6.12 We welcome support for ‘new enterprise activity in under-performing locations’, including targeted support for social enterprise and enterprise in rural areas
6.13 Concern that the ‘nine districts’ where most people with no qualifications reside should not be exclusive, ie. takes no account at sub-district level of pockets of poor educational attainment such as Skelmersdale, Burscough etc
6.15 Barrow may not be the only district defined as having no economic drivers with high concentrations of worklessness remote from the areas of major growth. Also, refocusing and intensifying employability activities in five particular districts risks undermining community regeneration and development efforts in multiply- deprived communities such as Skelmersdale
6.16 Promoting sustainable growth in rural areas needs better analysis of the key issues facing rural communities including the regeneration of market towns, local procurement policies and practices and local sustainability/social inclusion. This is especially important given the likely future focus of EU structural fund interventions to support rural diversity and economic growth. The classification of market towns is already of significant importance for housing corporation funding via the new National Affordable Housing Programme.
6.17 We welcome policy for stabilising smaller urban centres in areas of need but is this just about physical infrastructure improvements or will it be a more cross- cutting policy aimed at creating sustainable communities (particularly those not benefiting from major public support such as NRF, LEGI etc?
6.18 We also welcome recognition of Regional Parks initiatives but feel that the visitor/tourism opportunities throughout the region (particularly at district-level) have not been properly addressed in terms of their potential for future job creation and visitor retention within the region, eg. inland waterways, natural and historical heritage etc
6.19 The absence of a costed action plan also prevents detailed scrutiny of the strategic priorities outlined in the document. In many respects, the pitch is too generic and circumvents many local issues which impact on the regional economy and which may only serve to increase sub-regional disparities and create unsustainable economic hot-spots rather than an equitable distribution of overall regional growth and prosperity
7.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
7.1 This RES is subject to the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive. Consequently an Environment Report has been produced on the draft RES to look at the potential impact of the policies proposed..
8.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
8.1 The Regional Economic Strategy does not require any direct resource implications for the Council. Clearly, however, if West Lancashire is to continue to contribute to RES then this will require detailed project development through the District’s work with the Local Strategic Partnership. Where possible external funding will be secured to implement projects and provide the necessary skilled staff.
9. RISK ASSESSMENT
9.1 No risk assessment has been carried out on the RES Review.
10.0 CONCLUSIONS
10.1 The RES is a very important document for the future sustainable growth of the North West. If West Lancashire and the particular issues facing West Lancashire are to be dealt with then we need to ensure that these are covered in the RES. The RES is likely to be the framework for future delivery of regeneration programmes. It is therefore very important that our interests are represented.
Background Documents The following background documents (as defined in Section 100D (5) of the Local Government Act 1972) have been relied on to a material extent in preparing this Report.
Date Document File Ref July 2005 Regional Economic Strategy Review -
Appendices
Appendix A Achieving the RES Review Vision
AGENDA ITEM
CABINET: 20th September 2005
______
Report of: Executive Manager, Community Services, and Executive Manager Regeneration and Property
Relevant Portfolio Holders: Councillor D. Westley and Councillor I. Grant
Contact for further information: P. Cooley (Ext: 5143)
SUBJECT: LAND AT LAWNS AVENUE, TONTINE, UP HOLLAND – ACQUISITION OF OPEN SPACE
The following wards are affected. Up Holland
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To consider an offer of Land, at Lawns Avenue, Tontine, Up Holland.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That Members indicate their wishes in respect of this offer detailed in item 6.1 of this report.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 The land in question is an area of informal public open space currently owned by Lancashire County Council. Historically the land has been maintained to a basic level by the District Councils grounds maintenance service, no recharge has ever been made to the County Council for this service.
3.2 In 2004 the County Council declared the land surplus and approached the District Council about possible purchase. They were informed that the District Council had no interest in, or use for, the land, and therefore would not wish to purchase.
4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 The land was advertised for sale by auction and the local residents and Parish Council registered a strong objection to the sale of land to a private individual and requested a public meeting.
4.2 The public meeting was attended by County Councillor Martin. Having heard the views expressed, Councillor Martin made an offer for the land to be gifted to a “local” organisation.
4.3 In subsequent telephone conversations the County Council offered the land to the District Council for 99years for a rental of £1 per year if requested. With a suggestion that should the parish council wish to manage the area the District could sub let to the Parish.
4.4 Officers attended a meeting with Parish Councillors and residents in order to ascertain the local wishes and aspirations in respect of the land and its management. At this meeting options were discussed which included:
• The transfer of land directly to the Parish Council
• The Transfer of land to the District Council
• The Transfer of land to the District Council with a subsequent sub letting to the Parish Council
4.5 At the meeting both the residents and Parish Councillors confirmed that their sole wish was to protect the land in its current form as informal open space. In order to do this the following preferences where identified.
• That the District Council accepts the land, (ideally the freehold) and continues to maintain it to current levels.
• That there was no wish or aspiration to develop the land for increased informal or formal use.
• That any land transfer agreement should not preclude the future letting of the land to the Parish Council should views on increased development or management change.
5.0 ISSUES
5.1 Although the District Council currently maintain the land to a minimal standard no other outgoings are currently incurred.
5.2 The District Council currently have no legal obligations or liability in respect of the area, however responsibility would be assumed if the land is transferred to the District.
5.3 Following discussions with the County Council, Officers have been advised that the site in question comprised the former footprint of the Old Brickwork Buildings. Unfortunately no site investigation works are available for the site. However, ex-brickwork sites have generally been found in the past to be contaminated with various (and sometimes quite serious) waste products from the brickmaking process, Members, therefore, need to be aware that significant liabilities could be transferred to the District Council if it assumes ownership.
5.4 Whilst the current use of the site, as a public open space, does not raise any concerns at the moment, clearly the risk of coming into contact with any possible contaminants would be raised should any excavation/re-development of the site take place (although no such actions are currently proposed).
5.5 For information, a full site investigation, if it proved necessary, could easily cost around £10-25k, with full scale remediation, if necessary, possibly into five or six figures.
5.6 Subsequent discussions have been held with the Parish Council following the initial meeting, as despite the initial outcome of the public meeting officers had difficulty considering why the disposal from the County could not be direct with the Parish Council.
5.7 Such a disposal direct to the parish would conform to the District Council actions on other sites similar to this within the District.
5.8 Following subsequent discussion, the District Council have received a formal request in by the Parish; the details of this are in the letter appended to this report.
6.0 PROPOSALS
6.1 Members are requested to agree which course of action they would wish to take in this matter, either;
6.1.1 That Members agree to the Transfer of the land from Lancashire County Council to West Lancs District Council at a Peppercorn, each party to bear their own cost. And the District Council will then continue to maintain on an ad hoc basis.
6.1.2 That Members do not agree to the transfer of the land but request that Lancashire County Council treat direct with the Parish Council in this matter. If this were to occur a management agreement would be put in place with the Parish Council and the District Council covering the issues of maintenance, unlawful access, and public liability insurance. As detailed in the penultimate paragraph of the Parish Councils letter of the 4th August.
7.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
7.1 Any increase in local management would support the aims of the Community Strategy in respect of increasing local involvement in local provision.
8.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
8.1 The cost of maintaining the land at its current level is included in current revenue budgets.
8.2 Should Members agree to item 6.1.2 of this report resources will be required to deal with any future possible unlawful access issues.
8.3 The potential site contamination issues described in 5.3 to 5.5 above could have significant financial implications, which are not currently budgeted for.
9.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
9.1 Although maintenance costs are currently met by the District Council the current level of maintenance is minimal. It is possible that local expectations may increase in the future
9.2 The District Council currently has no liability in respect of the land, if the land is accepted and management responsibility is assumed and retained by the District Council then all liability will also be assumed.
Background Documents
There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices
Appendix A: Letter received from Parish Council of Up Holland Appendix B: Letter received from Lancashire County Council
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20th September 2005
______Report of: Executive Manager, Community Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor David Westley
Contact for further information: Peter Cooley (ext. 5143)
SUBJECT: USE OF SECTION 106 MONIES IN SCARISBRICK.
The following wards are affected: Scarisbrick
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To consider a request from Scarisbrick Parish Council regarding the use of monies received from housing developers for the enhancement of public open space and recreation provision in the Parish.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That the project detailed in section 6 of this report be approved and that the sum of £28,560, once received, be made available to the Scarisbrick Village Hall Committee toward the project
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 Members will recall that under policy (LE.13) of the local plan developers must provide open space facilities as part of housing developments. Where developers are less than 20 dwellings or on sites where it is not reasonable to expect a developer to provide on-site facilities, and where there is a deficiency of open space, the Council can require a commuted sum for the provision and maintenance of improvements to nearby open space or for the creation of new leisure related facilities in the area.
3.2 In accordance with the decision of the planning committee held on January 10th 2002 the views of the relevant Parish Council’s are sought in respect of the potential use of this money.
3.3 In Scarisbrick a sum of £9,000 has been received in relation to a development at 91-95 Southport Road and a sum of £ 19,560 is due to be paid in relation to a development at the former Swan public house on Bescar Lane. This gives a total of £28,560 available for use in Scarisbrick.
4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 The Parish Council have been consulted, and the proposals shown in section 6 have been put forward for consideration.
4.2 The Executive Manager Planning and Development Services offers the view that the project falls within the broad terms set by Planning Committee for securing this funding – that is, that the expenditure will lead to new or enhanced recreational facilities, or more effective use of facilities, in the appropriate location.
5.0 ISSUES
5.1 The proposal complies with the criteria for the use of Section 106 monies.
5.2 The Proposal is in keeping with the aims of the District Play Policy.
6.0 PROPOSALS
6.1 Scarisbrick Village Hall Committee are currently involved in a project to carry out major refurbishment works to play facilities in the grounds of the Village Hall, Smithy Lane,
6.2 The Project‘s initial phase was to fully replace equipment and Surfacing at the traditional equipped play area at a cost of £25,300. This has been completed with a contribution of £16,000, which Scarisbrick Parish Council had secured through the Parish Council Capital Programme.
6.3 The Remainder of work is planned in two further phases:
a) The Provision of specialist equipment for target age groups including toddlers play equipment and a Teenage Shelter at an estimated cost of £16,000.
b) The Provision of a Multi Use Games Area (Ball Games Court). Estimated Cost £29,000.
6.4 The Parish Council suggests that the 106 funding be used toward this project, specifically toward “b”, the multi use games area.
7.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
7.1 These projects will all support the Council’s aim of increasing involvement in the management of local facilities and strategic aims in respect of improving access to quality facilities and ensuring access to a wide age range.
8.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
8.1 The estimated cost of the Multi use Games area is £29,000 any shortfall between the 106 monies available and the final capital cost will be met by the Parish Council or the Village Hall Committee from their own resources.
8.2 The Parish Council have requested that the contribution is toward capital costs the ongoing maintenance will be provided by the Village Hall Committee from their own resources.
8.3 The Parish Council and Village Hall Committee are aware that in these circumstances the ongoing maintenance of any facility provided is their responsibility and that the District Council gives no undertaking to support the project beyond the capital contribution.
9.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
9.1 There is a minimal risk that Parish Council will fail to carry out agreed work however this risk can be mitigated by operating simple agreements and appropriate cash draw down arrangements.
10.0 CONCLUSIONS
10.1 The proposed projects, presented following consultation with Parish Council representatives, are in keeping with the Council’s strategic aims and with the criteria for the use of 106 monies received for the enhancement of recreation and public open space. The projects should therefore be supported.
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D (5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this report.
Appendices
None
AGENDA ITEM
CABINET: 20th September 2005
Report of: Executive Manager, Community Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor D. Westley
Contact for further information: Peter R. Cooley (Ext. 5143)
SUBJECT: PLAY AREA PROVISION RAVENSCROFT, UP HOLLAND - RESULT OF RESIDENTS’ SURVEY
The following wards are affected Up Holland.
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To advise members of the outcome of a recent survey of residents’ views and to seek guidance on the appropriate subsequent course of action.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That negotiations take place with developers to secure the removal of the play area at Orchid Close, Up Holland, and to prevent the development of the play area at Galloway Drive.
2.2 That play equipment removed from Orchid Close be made available to Up Holland Parish Council for use elsewhere in the Parish. That the balance of funding outstanding from uncompleted work by the developers, in accordance with Section 106 Agreement obligations, be used to meet the cost of removal and landscaping at the areas in question and that any remaining funds be used for the enhancement of public open space in the vicinity.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 Ravenscroft is a new housing development in Up Holland, constructed by a number of development companies
3.2 As part of the initial site proposals, developers agreed to the provision of 3 equipped play spaces including one adjacent to Orchid Close at the rear of an established woodland.
3.3 As part of an adjacent development, a further play area was proposed in close proximity to the Orchid Close facility.
3.4 The Orchid close facility was constructed by Barrett Homes in 2004, as yet it has not been adopted by the District Council.
3.5 The Galloway Drive Play Area, to be provided by Morris Homes has not yet been constructed although a circular tarmacadam base has been provided.
4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 Residents have reported high levels of vandalism and juvenile nuisance at the Orchid Close play area and local Police have been heavily involved in dealing with problems at the location. These incidents resulted in high levels of correspondence from residents to the Leisure Services.
4.2 Officers of the Community Services Division, along with Ward Councillors and the Portfolio Holder for Community Services, attended a Public Meeting in May at which residents presented a petition signed by 65 plus residents requesting the removal of the existing play area and the termination of plans for a second.
4.3 Residents reported a catalogue of incidents of anti social behaviour, which included drinking, rowdy and drunken behaviour and vandalism to the play area and local properties, some incidents had led to arrests and personal attacks on residents.
4.4 Officers discussed with residents the Council’s play policy and the possible positive impact of providing additional activities aimed at teenagers as a method of reducing negative behaviour. The residents felt that, given their experience, they would not support such an approach at this location.
4.5 At the meeting it was agreed that a full survey of the views of all residents would be undertaken and the results reported to Cabinet for a decision on future action.
4.6 It was agreed that a representative group of residents would assist officers with the production and circulation of survey questionnaires.
4.7 A copy of the survey documents has been appended to this report.
4.8 A copy of a table showing the full outcome of the survey is also appended, however, the key responses indicate that although the majority of residents recognise the importance of play they would welcome the removal of the play area at Orchid Close and do not wish to see the proposed development at Galloway Drive proceed. They would seek to see the areas landscaped and left as public open space and the play equipment, plus any remaining resources, utilised for play provision elsewhere in the Up Holland area.
5.0 ISSUES
5.1 The play area at Orchid Close has been provided by Barrett Homes under the conditions of a Section 106 Agreement and has not yet been adopted by the Council. Any Proposal to amend the situation would require agreement with the developers.
5.2 Morris Homes have already indicated that they are willing to amend proposals for Galloway Drive and are prepared to pay the value of any balance of work outstanding to the Council for use in the enhancement of public open space anywhere in the Parish.
6.0 PROPOSALS
6.1 That the Cabinet accept the views of the local residents and instruct officers to negotiate with Barrett Homes accordingly.
6.2 That the cost of removal and refurbishment of the Orchid Close play area and the landscaping of the Galloway Drive area be met from the balance of monies outstanding from Barrett and Morris Homes’ Section 106 obligations.
6.3 That the play equipment removed be donated to the Up Holland Parish Council for use elsewhere in the area and any surplus funding be utilised for the enhancement of public open space within the Parish, ideally for play provision, in accordance with the Council Play Policy.
7.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
7.1 It is Council policy, where possible, to involve local people in local decision- making. Had this facility been planned in an established residential area full consultation would have taken place prior to installation. This has not been possible here as the play facility was planned prior to construction and occupation of houses. Acting in accordance with residents’ views now meets the Council’s aim of local involvement.
7.2 This play area was designed prior to the production of the Council’s Play Policy, which recommends fewer, bigger and better play areas. The release of equipment and resources, which may result from this situation, could assist the Council to work with the Parish Council to provide a substantial facility to serve the larger Parish area in accordance with this policy.
8.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
8.1 It is estimated that the cost of required equipment removal, and landscaping, will be met from monies provided by the developers involved.
8.2 The cost of ongoing maintenance of landscaped areas will be met from 106 resources as is usual in such situations.
9.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
9.1 The removal of the equipment gives no guarantee that anti social behaviour in the area will reduce. There is a possibility that problems will relocate rather than disappear.
10.0 CONCLUSIONS
10.1 That in this instance it is an appropriate course of action to follow the views of the estate residents as failure to do so would create a situation where a facility which is dependant on community cooperation and involvement for success, would be unwelcome and, therefore, unlikely to meet it’s aims.
Background Documents
The following background documents (as defined in Section 100D (5) of the Local Government Act 1972) have been relied on to a material extent in preparing this Report.
Date Document File Ref 25 05 05 Petition From Residents Leisure Working File Various Letters from Residents Leisure Working File Various Completed Survey Questionnaires Leisure Working File
Appendices
Appendix 1 - Copy of Survey Documents Appendix 2 - Table of Survey Results
APPENDIX 1
20th June 2005 Pete. Cooley/ Paula Campbell 01695 585143/ 01695 585144 PC/PC/HA
Dear Resident,
RAVENSCROFT AT GALLOWAY DRIVE PLAY PROVISION
As required under planning approvals Barrett Homes have provided a play area between Orchid Close and Galloway Drive and Morris Homes had intended to provide a second facility at the end of Galloway Drive.
Given the proximity of the two sites, construction of the Galloway Drive area has been suspended pending a survey of residents’ views.
As a result of concerns expressed by many Ravenscroft and Galloway Drive residents concerning the location of the “Barratt” play area and resulting high levels of anti-social behaviour we are also seeking views on the future of this facility.
I would therefore be grateful if you could complete the attached questionnaire and return it in the envelope provided.
The results of the survey will be reported to the Council’s Cabinet who will make a decision based on the results.
Only returned questionnaires will be considered therefore please take the trouble to complete the form in order to ensure that your views are represented.
Yours faithfully
P. COOLEY LEISURE DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY MANAGER pcgallowaydrive
GALLOWAY DRIVE RAVENSCROFT – RESIDENT SURVEY
PLAY PROVISION
1. Do you feel that adequate play facilities Yes/No are important to a community?
2. Do you feel that the existing play equipment Yes/No is adequate and correctly sited?
3. Do you have children? Yes/No If yes, what ages 0-5 5-11 Please tick 12-16 16+
4. What action would you wish the Council to take in respect of the area? Please tick all that you would wish.
Remove all equipment and landscape the area
Provide improved and increased equipment
Provide denser perimeter planting/landscaping
Increase equipment on site to cater specifically for teenagers.
Increase the height of fencing and seek local volunteer to lock.
Install CCTV
5. In respect of the proposed Morris Homes play area on Galloway Drive please indicate what actions you wish the Council to take. (Please tick all that apply)
Install the Morris Homes prepare equipment as planned.
Provide no new play equipment but provide seating at the tarmacadam circle.
Provide no new play equipment and remove and landscape the tarmacadam area.
Provide enhanced landscaping at the end of Galloway Drive.
Take no action.
6. In the event that the play area is not provided the Developer will make a financial contribution to the Council in lieu of the cost.
If no play equipment is provided how would you wish this money to be used? (Tick all that apply)
To enhance play equipment elsewhere in the Up Holland area
To assist with costs of agreed remedial action at the Barratt Play Area
To meet the cost of enhanced landscaping.
7. What distance would you/your children 100 250 ¼ ½ 1 Further be prepared to travel to access quality play areas yds yds mile mile mile (Please tick appropriate box)
Please note that any future action will be subject to Council approval, Planning Committee approval (if required) and the identification of appropriate and adequate funding and resources. pcgallowaydrive
APPENDIX 2
Galloway Drive- Ravenscroft – Resident Survey Results
Sent Out % Received % No Response % Questionnaires 215 100% 116 53.95 99 46.04
Following percentages are based on 116 surveys received.
Yes % No % 1. Play facilities 104 89.65 9 7.75 important
Yes % No % 2. Existing play 27 23.27 85 73.27 equipment adequate
Yes % No % 3. Have Children 84 72.41 32 27.58
0-5 year % 5-11 years % 12-16 years 16+ years Ages 45 38 19 16
4. What action would you wish the Council to take in respect of the Orchid Close play area?
Number % Remove all equipment and landscape the area 77 66.37
Provide improved and increased equipment 23 19.82
Provide denser perimeter planting/ landscaping 24 20.68
Increase equipment on site to cater specifically 7 6.03 for teenagers Increase the height of fencing and seek local 23 19.82 volunteer to lock Install CCTV 37 31.89
5. What action do you wish the Council to take in respect of the proposed Morris Homes play area on Galloway Drive?
Number %
Install the Morris Homes prepare equipment as 29 25.00 planned
Provide no new play equipment, but provide 8 6.89 seating at the tarmacadam circle
Provide no new play equipment and remove 65 56.03 and landscape the tarmacadam area
Provide enhanced landscaping at the end of 41 35.34 Galloway Drive Take no action 6 5.17
6. If no play area is provided how would you wish the money to be used?
Enhance play equipment % Assist cost of Barratt % Meet cost of enhanced % in Up Holland Play Area landscaping 49 42.24 40 34.48 64 55.17
7. What distance would you travel to access quality play equipment?
100yd % 250yd % ¼ % ½ % 1 % Furthe % s s mile mile mile r 12 10.34 18 15.51 25 21.55 20 17.24 21 18.10 16 13.7 9
Other Comments Received :
Children of all ages should have somewhere to go. There doesn’t seem to be anything for teenagers, and yet on this estate there are a lot of them.
Baby swings and a lower climbing area are needed for smaller children
Teenagers cannot be ignored they need some facilities. .
There are no baby swings on any of the parks in the area. I feel that this is poor planning of equipment.
Play area, accident waiting to happen, get rid of play area and bushes.
Tranquillity of area spoilt.
Concerns from few residents of Broadacre who may inherit problems should play area development not go ahead on other sites within the estate.
Concern as above from resident in Dewbury Fields, also requested trees be cut back.
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20th September 2005
______Report of: Executive Manager Community Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor D. Westley
Contact for further information: S. Kent ( ext 5169 )
SUBJECT: DEDICATION OF CYCLE TRACKS IN SKELMERSDALE
The following wards are affected:- Skelmersdale North, Ashurst, Birch Green
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To seek Member approval for the District Council to dedicate cycle tracks in Skelmersdale.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That the two main cycle routes, shown on Appendix 1 as the Northern Route and Westheads Clough Route, be dedicated as cycle tracks and the Executive Manager Community Services, in conjunction with the Council Secretary and Solicitor be authorised to implement the formal dedication where the route in this Council's ownership.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 In 2004 the County Council, in partnership with the District Council, commenced a programme to develop Quality Access Routes in Skelmersdale. The intention was to construct the routes and formally designate them as cycle tracks in order that their on-going management becomes the responsibility of the County Council as Highway Authority.
3.2 The first of these routes, running from the town centre to Lathom High School with a link to the Asda site ( the Northern Route ), has been completed, except for signing and marking, and the second route, which runs through Birch Green ( Westheads Clough Route ), is in preparation.( see Appendix 1 – Quality Access Routes:Northern and Westheads Clough Routes ). Further routes are still in their proposal stage.
4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 Completion of the routes is dependent on their formal designation as cycle tracks, which will provide the assurance that liabilities, both legal and management, are clear and attributable.
4.2 The most straightforward method of designating the cycle tracks is for the owner of the land over which they run to formally dedicate the land for that purpose. In Skelmersdale the majority of the cycle routes will be located on land owned by the District Council.
4.3 At this stage we are proposing to undertake the designation of the first two cycle routes, which would include dedication by this Council of the sections of the routes in its ownership. These sections are a) the Northern Route (all route except A to B) and b) Westheads Clough Route (all route) (see Appendix 1 – Quality Access Routes:Northern and Westheads Clough Routes ).
5.0 ISSUES
5.1 Whilst many of the new routes in Skelmersdale may have been used as cycle routes previously a Skelmersdale Cycle Network study undertaken in 2003, and subsequent investigations, have uncovered very little in the way of documentary evidence that these routes had any formal legal status as cycle routes, therefore it is felt that this dedication process is the best way to proceed.
5.2 A dedication process undertaken by a landowner can only be completed if the Highway Authority approves the standard of the route as being suitable for the purpose for which it is dedicated. In this instance the upgrading of the routes is being undertaken by the Highway Authority, and therefore they have indicated that the process would be supported.
5.3 The only section of the first two routes being considered that is not in District Council ownership is at Lathom High School, and the County Council is dealing with the dedication of this themselves.
5.4 A dedication would specify the exact length and width of the track to be dedicated. The dedications would have to be done in sections as they would be broken at each highway intersection. Wherever possible our routes have been constructed to a width of 3 metres, and this, plus a further 1 metre to one edge of each section to include the associated street lighting, will be the extent of each dedication.
5.5 The route dedication would only come into force when the facility had been completed and the Highway Authority had approved it as being of an acceptable standard.
6.0 PROPOSALS
6.1 Undertaking this dedication procedure is the preferred method to establish a legal standing for our new cycle tracks, and ensure that on-going management and maintenance would be confirmed as the responsibility of the County Council. It is proposed therefore that Members approve that the two main routes shown on appendix 1 as the Northern Route and Westheads Clough Route be dedicated as cycle tracks, and recommend to Council that the Executive Manager Community Services in conjunction with the Council Secretary and Solicitor be authorised to implement the formal dedication procedure.
7.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
7.1 Dedication of cycle tracks in Skelmersdale will support the process of sustainable transport, increase the level of leisure provision, and improve quality of life and healthy activities in the town
8.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
8.1 Taking this process forward can be undertaken at little cost and utilising existing staff resources.
9.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
9.1 Without the formal dedication of our new cycle routes as cycle tracks the legal and management responsibility would remain with the District Council.
10.0 CONCLUSIONS
10.1 The dedication of the two routes mentioned is phase 1 of a scheme to establish a network of cycle routes in Skelmersdale. Ensuring that these routes are legally defined as cycle tracks protects the District Council from the legal and management responsibilities inherent within this type of facility, whilst providing the town with sustainable and healthy transport links.
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D (5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this report.
Appendices
Appendix 1 – Quality Access Routes:Northern and Westheads Clough Routes AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20 September 2005
______Report of: Street Scene Services Manager
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor J T Baldock Councillor I Ashcroft
Contact for further information: Mr G Concannon (Extn. 167) Mr J Cummins (Extn. 164)
SUBJECT: VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAMME – 2005/2006
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To seek Member approval for the replacement of vehicles for the period 1st April 2005 to 31st March 2006.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That Members approve the Vehicle Replacement Programme for period 1st April 2005 to 31st March 2006.
2.2 That the Street Scene Manager in consultation with the relevant Portfolio Holder, be given delegated authority to invite Tenders and to accept the lowest most suitable tenders for the purchase of vehicles in accordance with the approved Vehicle Replacement Programme.
2.3 That for future years the Street Scene Manager, in consultation with the relevant Portfolio Holder be authorised to:-
A) Determine the Vehicle Replacement Programme.
B) Seek Quotations/Tenders for replacement vehicles and accept the lowest most suitable quotation/tender for vehicles in accordance with the Programme, subject to budgetary approval for such replacements being made in the Council’s Capital Programme and report back in the appropriate Members update.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 The Authority replaces its vehicles on a rolling programme based on the expected life of each item.
3.2 Each of the Authority’s Divisional Services budgets include costs associated with the replacement programme.
3.3 To minimise the impact to service delivery and to provide vehicle cover for routine maintenance, breakdown and increased workload, the Transport Section contains within its fleet a small number of spare pool vehicles. This practice continues to be cost effective, especially for specialist vehicles, such as refuse collection vehicles which can prove difficult and expensive to hire.
4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 The following table details vehicles due for replacement between 1st April 2005 and 31st March 2006 including service allocation, anticipated replacement cost, lease period and annual indicative lease costs.
Description Regn. Service Replacement Lease Lease No Area Cost Years Cost p.a Johnson 600 R692 Street £90,000 7 £17,100 H.G.V JMA Cleansing Roadsweeper Street Scene IVECO 49.10 V277 HH £29,000 5 £5,510 Link Tip DBA Demount NISSAN R783 HH £17,000 5 £3,230 Cabstar KCW NISSAN R785 HH £17,000 5 £3,230 Cabstar KCW RENAULT 110 S599 Grounds £29,000 5 £5,510 Crew Cab CDM Maint. Tipper Street Scene LEYLAND 45 V876 Refuse £46,000 3 £9,890 Link Packer JFM Street Scene
SEDDON X297 Refuse £121,000 5 £22,990 ATKINSON ULG Street Scene LDV CONVOY R686 Grounds £22,000 5 £4,180 LUTON TAIL JMA Maint LIFT Street Scene 35 CWT LDV X257 HH £13,000 5 £2,470 CONVOY UMB LDV PANEL DG02 Community £15,000 3 £3,225 VAN JXW Services
ASTRA VAN PL02 Community £15,000 3 £3,225 FYP Services
ASTRA VAN PL02 Community £15,000 3 £3,225 FYR Services
ASTRA VAN PL02 Community £15,000 3 £3,225 FYS Services MASSEY V132 Grounds £26,000 5 £4,940 FERGUSON ECW Maint. TRACTOR KUBOTA PK02 Grounds £15,000 3 £3,117 MOWER UFV Main.
4.2 The number, type and make of vehicle will be determined following an evaluation of business and service needs.
4.3 The replacement of vehicles contained within the 2005/2006 Programme will be in accordance with the Authority’s Contract procurement rules, financial regulations and the EU procurement directives.
4.4 Within Homecare vehicles identified for replacement in previous reports have yet to be replaced. A number of vehicles have been trialed, but a decision has yet to be made.
4.5 All vehicle changes required as the District Council moves towards alternate weekly collections, have been taken into consideration.
5.0 PROPOSALS
5.1 Following an assessment by our Transport Manager and discussion with user sections, it is proposed to extend the lease arranged on our Johnson Sweeper which are in good condition. Extension to the remaining Housing Vehicle provision will also be made due to the present uncertainty regarding the District Council’s housing stock.
5.2 In order to facilitate the efficient trading of business it is suggested that in future years the Street Scene Manager set the Vehicle Replacement Programme in consultation with the relevant Portfolio Holders and seek replacement vehicles in accordance with the approved Replacement Programme.
5.3 It is to be appreciated that all vehicles shall be purchased in compliance with Council’s contract procedure regulations, financial regulations and the requirements of the EU procurement rules.
6.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
6.1 Where market opportunities exist, consideration will be given to purchasing vehicles powered by Liquid Petroleum Gas, Electricity, Ultra-Low Sulphur Diesel or fitting with Eminox exhaust systems that minimise environmental impact by reducing pollution .
7.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
7.1 The estimates total value of replacement within the 2005/2006 programme is £485,000 and the associated operating lease costs is likely to be £95,067 per annum.
8.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1 By clearly setting out the Council’s proposals for its transport needs, these proposals should mitigate against the risk of failing to achieve the District Council’s overall priorities and objectives.
Background Documents
There are no background documents (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
AGENDA ITEM
Cabinet:
20th September 2005
______Report of: Executive Manager Planning/Development Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor Iain Ashcroft.
Contact for further information: C. Brady (extn 5125)
SUBJECT: LANCASHIRE HIGHWAYS PARTNERSHIP
The following wards are affected. District Wide
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To consider the impact on this Council of the decision taken at the Lancashire County Council Cabinet meeting held on 1st September 2005 of its preferred option regarding the future of the Lancashire Highways Partnership.
1.2 To inform Members of the current working arrangements within the Partnership Agreement and the implications of the loss of the Section 38 duties, particularly with respect to the Council’s ability to successfully deliver its residual engineering functions in undertaking works on the adopted highway network.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That Members consider the response it wishes to make to Lancashire County Council with particular reference to the options set out in 6.1. of this report.
3.0 BACKGROUND
3.1 A letter (attached as an Appendix) was received on the 5th September 2005 from Lancashire County Council stating that at the meeting held on 1st September 2005 the County Council Cabinet decided that its preferred option for the future of the Lancashire Highways Partnership was Option 2 – “ The County Council become responsible for the delivery of the County Council’s client highway functions directly “and that the Executive Director of Environment be requested to initiate formal consultations with District Councils, with the intention of bringing a further report to Cabinet on 6th October 2005 for a final decision”. Views have been requested by 23rd September hence this report has had to be prepared at short notice.
3.2 From 1st April 1974 up to and including the 30th June 2003 this Council carried out the delivery of County Council’s client highway ordinary and special maintenance functions within a designated core area of the West Lancashire District. These functions were identified within a Highways Agency Agreement jointly agreed between both the District and County Council.
3.3 As of 1st July 2003 all existing Highway Agency Agreements between Lancashire County Council and the various Councils within the Lancashire area were terminated and replaced with a Lancashire Highways Partnership Agreement. This Agreement covered the delivery of the relevant client highway functions by the Districts and was to run for a period of 3 years only, after which time it automatically terminated, unless extended by the County Council.
3.4 At that time a decision was made by Members to hand back the work in connection with the client highway ordinary and special maintenance functions previously carried out by this Council under the Highways Agency Agreement and enter into a new Partnership Agreement, but with greatly reduced functionality. These were for the carrying out of duties in connection with the delivery of the County Council’s Section 38 function (adoption of highways) and Public Rights of Way only.
4.0 CURRENT POSITION
4.1 As stated above, the current Partnership Agreement terminates on 30th June 2006 after which time the County Council are at present proposing to undertake all client highway functions directly themselves. This proposal will have a far greater degree of impact on Councils within the Lancashire County Council area that currently operate full Highway Agency Partnership Agreements coupled with DSO service arrangements. The implications for this Council are much more limited – albeit these consequences will have to be considered and will affect the staff undertaking duties in connection with Section 38 Agreements.
4.2 Given that this Council was only notified on Monday 5th September 2005 of this decision, there has been insufficient time to assess all of the implications relating to this request and subsequently provide a complete report to Members on all issues concerned. The Chief Executives Group are discussing this subject at a meeting on Friday 9th September, at which Les Abernethy, Deputy Chief Executive is attending and any matters arising from this meeting will be reported orally at the Cabinet meeting.
5.0 ISSUES
5.1 The decision of the County Council’s Cabinet to indicate its preference to allow the current county wide Partnership Agreement to terminate on 30th June 2006 will not have a major impact on this Council although some detailed issues will need to be addressed in a further report.
5.2 However, the current arrangements whereby the Council provides partnership services on Section 38 Agreements and Public Rights of Way only has worked well and brings with it some added value:-
(i) enabled the Council in a more streamlined process, to undertake and supervise directly works on the adopted highway network and work in partnership with LCC in securing improvements to the street scene/adopted highway network to the benefit of the local community (e.g. Church Street and Aughton Street Schemes, Ormskirk)
(ii) enabled the Council to influence, more effectively, highway infrastructure design at planning submission stage
(iii) has given us a Member representative seat on the Area Members Board
5.3 Should the final decision be taken by the County to terminate all highway functions then some alternative arrangements should be considered to allow the District Council to achieve real influence in a number of areas including:-
a) tackling residents on street parking issues
b) continuing to facilitate the District Council in bringing forward town centre enhancement schemes, installation and erection of street furniture and signage
c) promoting improvements to the Public Rights of Way network
6.0 OPTIONS
6.1 Three options are offered for Members consideration:-
1. That no objection be offered to the proposal by LCC to terminate the Highways Partnership in June 2006
2. The LCC be asked to retain the Partnership in a limited form giving Districts the ability to continue to offer a service in relation to Section 38 Agreements and Public Rights of Way because of the mutual benefits arising
3. That no objection be offered as set out in 1 above but subject to alternative arrangements being put in place to allow District Councils to fund and put in place environmental enhancements on the public highway (particularly in town centres) and to have effective influence in securing improvements in relation to residents’ parking schemes, public rights of way and associated matters.
7.0 SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS/COMMUNITY STRATEGY
7.1 There are no sustainability issues arising from this report.
8.0 FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
8.1 Due to the limited amount if time available it has not been possible to assess the financial/resource implications as a result of the County Council’s decision.
9.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
9.1 If appropriate working arrangements are not put in place with the County Council it may jeopardise the ability to deliver the Council’s Capital Programme in relation to town centre improvements.
Background Documents
There are no background documents. (as defined in Section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices:
Appendix A - Letter from Lancashire County Council, Environment Director
AGENDA ITEM:
CABINET: 20th September 2005
OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE: 6th October 2005
______
Report of: Executive Manager Financial Services
Relevant Portfolio Holder: Councillor A. Owens
Contact for further information: Marc Taylor (Extn.5092)
SUBJECT: MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL STRATEGY
District wide interest
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To seek Member approval for an update to the Medium Term Financial Strategy that forms part of the Council’s overall Medium Term Resources Strategy.
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO CABINET
2.1 That Members approve the update to the Medium Term Financial Strategy.
2.2 That the Executive Manager Financial Services be given delegated authority, in consultation with the Portfolio Holder, to adopt the Strategy in the event of there being no major issues arising from the Overview and Scrutiny Committee’s consideration of this document.
2.3 That call in is not appropriate for this item as it is being referred to the Overview and Scrutiny Committee for comments.
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
3.1 That the Committee comments as appropriate on the Strategy document.
4.0 BACKGROUND
4.1 A Medium Term Resources Strategy covering the period 2003-2006 was reported to Cabinet in June 2003 and to Overview and Scrutiny Committee in July 2003. This Strategy links together financial, human and property resources into one strategic document. It allows the Council to consider in advance the resource implications of future service delivery to allow efficient and effective performance management.
4.2 The Strategy recognises the need for periodic reviews to take place. This ensures that the Strategy remains up to date and that new information and recent developments are taken into account.
4.3 This report contains an updated version of the Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS), which is one element of the Council’s overall Medium Term Resources Strategy. There is a regulatory and financial management best practice requirement for the MTFS to be updated on an annual basis.
5.0 CURRENT POSITION
5.1 The Council will have to make a wide range of service delivery and budgetary decisions in the next few years. This new version of the MTFS will assist in this process by providing details on our future financial position. This latest version of the MTFS set out in the Appendix provides a strategic forecast of future levels of both expenditure and funding. This forecast covers the GRA, HRA and Capital for the period 2005-06 to 2007-08 and replaces previous versions of the MTFS.
5.2 The Property Resources and Human Resources Strategies that form the other parts of the Council’s overall Medium Term Resources Strategy are also currently being reviewed and will be updated later in the year. These updates will identify new issues and progress against the existing strategy.
6.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
6.1 This Strategy forms part of the overall financial management and control framework that is designed to minimise the financial risks facing the Council.
7.0 CONCLUSION
7.1 This Strategy will allow the Council to consider its future financial position and to make efficient and effective decisions on resource allocation.
Background Documents There are no background documents (as defined in section 100D(5) of the Local Government Act 1972) to this Report.
Appendices Medium Term Financial Strategy
WEST LANCASHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL STRATEGY 2005/06 TO 2007/08
SECTION 1 – PROCESS OVERVIEW
1. Introduction and background
This paper sets out the Council’s Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) for the three years (2005/06 to 2007/08), and provides a strategic forecast of future levels of both expenditure and potential resources.
There are a number of different medium term financial planning processes that operate within the authority. These include the HRA business plan, the three year capital programme and financial forecasting within the GRA. The MTFS draws together these elements to provide a comprehensive Council wide strategy that highlights key financial issues facing the authority over the next few years, and to promote the allocation of resources in line with corporate priorities.
The MTFS is compiled on a rolling three year basis with an annual update being produced to take account of new information and recent developments. This version of the MTFS updates and replaces the previous version of the strategy. To ensure a joined up approach to planning the MTFS has also been produced to be consistent with other Council strategies such as the Community Strategy, the Housing Strategy, the Capital Strategy and Service Action Plans.
2. General Approach
The MTFS considers the GRA, HRA and the Capital Programme in turn. In each case a forecast has been produced showing projections for future spending and resource levels together with a clear statement of what this will mean for the Council. The factors that are taken account in the strategy are summarised in the Appendix for ease of reference.
The process of building up these forecasts is important for the ongoing financial health of the Council. The forecasts clearly identify the level of financial commitments that exist, and will allow real choices to be made regarding priorities, and will also ensure that the full implications of budget decisions on service levels are known.
The MTFS is designed to compliment the standard budget setting process rather than replace it. The budget process will update the projections in the MTFS for the following year’s estimates taking account of more up to date information.
SECTION 2 – THE GENERAL REVENUE ACCOUNT
This part of the strategy sets out the financial forecast position for the General Revenue Account for 2005/06 to 2007/08.
1. Basis of Budget Forecast
Budget forecasts have largely been produced using the concept of a base budget uplift. This process involves updating ongoing costs and income to produce a bottom line budget requirement that would enable the current range and level of services to continue to be provided over the medium term. Consequently the forecasts tend to reflect a “stand still” budget position that does not allow for new policy initiatives or savings unless specifically highlighted below.
(a) Pay increases The forecast has included a pay award of 2.95% for 2006-07 based on the three year national pay deal that was implemented in 2004. An estimated pay award of 3% has then been included for 2007-08. The forecast also includes an additional allowance of 0.5% per year in relation to staff increments.
The Employers superannuation rate was increased from 12.7% to 17.0% in 2005-06 following a triennial actuarial revaluation of the pension fund. This rate is now fixed for the next 3 years and so the forecasts do not include any additional amounts for this factor.
However it should be noted that there are currently discussions taking place between the ODPM, Employers and Unions on the future affordability of the Local Government Pension Scheme. These negotiations may result in changes to the terms and conditions of the scheme that could have financial implications. It seems unlikely that these changes would have an impact on the Employers contribution rates until the next triennial actuarial valuation.
The forecasts also do not allow any additional amounts for the cost of implementing Job Evaluation and Equal Pay Audits by March 2007 to comply with the National Single Status Agreement and 2004 National Pay Agreement. This issue was the subject of a report to Council in July 2005.
Currently few Councils in the North West have fully implemented Job Evaluation Schemes. Where these schemes have been implemented the experience has typically been that considerable budgetary pressures have been created. This area will need to be carefully monitored as developments take place so that the financial implications can be incorporated into the budget setting process. This issue could potentially lead to a significant increase in pay costs for the Council.
(b) Contract inflation An allowance of £150,000 per year has been made for contract inflation and other committed cost increases. No other types of specific price inflation have been included in keeping with the approach used during budget setting, which is felt to be appropriate at a time of relatively low inflation.
(c) Temporary and one off items in the 2005-06 budget As part of the budget process for 2005-06 a number of policy options were agreed that have a budget impact in future years. In the main these are items that were approved on a temporary or one off basis for 2005-06 only. The net effect of these factors is a reduction of £35,000 in the budget requirement for 2006-07 and £100,000 for 2007-08.
(d) Commutation Adjustment Since 1992/93 the Council has benefited from an adjustment made for the commutation of loans in that year. Essentially this adjustment enables the Council to make a credit to its revenue account calculated according to a statutory formula. In 2007-08 the value of this adjustment decreases by around £150,000 and in subsequent years reduces even further. This effect will have a negative impact on our financial position.
(e) New Statutory Concessionary Fares Scheme A new statutory concessionary fares scheme is due to come into effect from 1st April 2006. This new scheme will provide free concessionary travel on off peak local bus services for senior citizens and people with disabilities. This will replace the half fare scheme that is currently in operation.
The government has provided provisional figures that suggest that the Council will receive an additional £910,000 to fund this new scheme through the grant support system. However it should be stressed that this is just a provisional estimate and the actual amount of grant that will be received will not become clearer until the end of the year.
The expenditure and resources forecasts both incorporate this £910,000 estimate as the additional cost of the scheme and the extra resources that will be received respectively. Consequently these projections have assumed a net nil impact. However both locally within Lancashire and nationally there are concerns that the extra funding that will be provided will be insufficient to cover the costs of the scheme. Currently work is underway to attempt to quantify the costs of the scheme for West Lancashire and this will be incorporated into the budget setting process in due course.
2. Basis of Resources Forecast
(a) Council tax income For the purpose of this forecast it is assumed that an increase in council tax will be made of 2.95% over the next two years. This was the actual level of the increase in 2005-06, and is broadly similar to current inflation rates and the estimated level of pay awards over future years. This level of increase has been used for planning purposes only and actual council tax increases will be determined during the annual budget setting process.
Over recent years there has been a steady and consistent growth in the tax base of the authority, and this factor also needs to be taken into account in the forecast of future Council tax income. Growth in the tax base has been estimated at 0.5% per year, which is a prudent figure based on currently available information.
The government has announced that it will consider the issue of council tax revaluation in time for the results to be incorporated in the 2007/08 financial year. This will include revaluing individual dwellings as well as potential changes to the council tax bands. This factor has not been included in the projections as details on the impact of the revaluation are not currently available.
(b) Grant support It is notoriously difficult to predict changes in the level of grant support that the government will provide. However in recent years the Council has received a floor increase in grant (on an adjusted basis) of 3% per annum. The Council has received this minimum level of increase because population figures have the single largest impact on grant levels and our population growth is significantly below the national average.
In July the government issued a consultation paper on potential changes to the formula grant system and formula spending shares (FSS). This paper considers a wide range of issues and provides exemplifications of 19 different options that would impact on district councils. Most of these exemplifications would have a relatively minor impact on West Lancs but certain options in relation to the Capital Financing FSS and the Area Cost Adjustment could have a significant positive effect.
It is not clear at this time what options for change will actually be implemented, and the results of the consultation will not become clear until the provisional local government finance settlement is published at the end of the year. Consequently on a prudent basis and for planning purposes it has been assumed that grant support will increase by 3% on an adjusted basis in future years.
The change in responsibilities in relation to the new concessionary fares scheme referred to above will mean that an additional £910,000 will be received in 2006-07 over and above the 3% floor level increase.
The government has recently announced that it intends to implement three year finance settlements for local government. The aim of this change is to provide greater financial certainty and stability, and to promote a more medium term approach to financial planning.
The finance settlement in autumn 2005 will now not just cover the next financial year but will cover the remaining two years of the government’s spending review cycle. From 2008-09, three year settlements will be fully aligned with the three year spending review cycle.
In future finance settlements should provide firm allocations of formula grant for future years. In addition specific revenue grants, capital grants and capital allocations will generally be allocated on a three year forward basis.
3. GRA Forecast
The following table shows a summary of the GRA forecast taking into account the factors set out above. The scale of the resources shortfall (the difference between the budget requirement and the available resources) is projected to be £185,000 in 2006-07 and £235,000 in 2007-08.
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
£000 £000 % £000 %
Budget Forecast 14,037 15,560 10.8% 16,100 3.5%*
Resources: Grant support 7,870 9,015 14.5% 9,285 3.0% Council tax 6,144 6,360 3.5% 6,580 3.5% Other 23 0 N/a 0 N/a Resources forecast 14,037 15,375 9.5% 15,865 3.2%
Resources shortfall 185 235
* Note – The budget forecast for 2007/08 has been calculated on an adjusted basis, assuming that the resources shortfall in 2006/07 was eliminated in that financial year.
The percentage increases in the budget forecast and grant support for 2006-07 is distorted by the inclusion of the £910,000 expenditure and funding for concessionary fares. The adjusted increases excluding this factor would be 4.4% for the budget forecast and 3.0% for the grant support.
The scale of the resources shortfall over the next 2 years is broadly similar to the projections from previous versions of the Medium Term Financial Strategy. This position however does not allow for any increase in costs from job evaluation and the new concessionary fares scheme.
4. Prospects for Growth
The forecast shown above does not include any allowance for growth to meet corporate priorities, member aspirations for growth or additional cost and spending pressures identified during the budget setting process.
During the course of 2005, growth bids for future years will emerge from the service planning and budget setting processes. It is not possible to predict at this time what the value or the importance of these growth bids will be. However past experience suggests that the initial value of growth bids will be well in excess of £500,000.
Given the resources shortfall identified in the forecast above this will mean that any growth that is agreed following scrutiny by both members and officers, will need to be funded from matching savings.
This funding can be found through a number of different ways. Savings options to reduce expenditure or increase income can be explored. The Council’s Organisational Reengineering Strategy and Value for Money initiatives may also identify potential opportunities. In addition the Council tax could be increased over the 2.95% level assumed for planning purposes, or reserves could be used to bridge the gap. The budget setting process will consider all of these issues in detail when determining the appropriate level to set the budget.
The introduction of the government’s new Local Authority Business Growth Incentive (LABGI) scheme will also provide an opportunity for growth. This scheme will reward local authorities that have an increase in their business rateable value above a floor level. This floor level has been set at –0.7% for 2005. The information received from the government to date suggests that for each £1,000 of rateable value above the floor the Council will receive additional grant funding of around £185 subject to a maximum ceiling. The amount of funding provided will be recalculated each year based on the growth in rateable value in that year.
The first grant reward will be paid in February 2006 based on growth in the rateable value base in 2005. This grant will not be ring fenced and so can be spent on any Council activity. The grant received may vary significantly from year to year in line with growth in business rateable values. Consequently this funding source would be most appropriate to develop one off revenue and capital schemes rather than long term schemes that have an ongoing budget requirement.
5. GRA Reserves and Balances
The total level of GRA reserves and balances that were available at the start of the 2005-06 financial year were £5.667m (excluding the Insurance Fund). The budget for 2005-06 was set on the basis that there would be no use of balances or reserves, leaving the anticipated position for the end of the year unchanged.
Reserves and Balances £000
Unallocated Working Balances 807 Unspecified Contingency 136 Total Unallocated Reserves 943 Core Working Balances 900 Other Earmarked Reserves 3,824 5,667 Total Reserves and Balances April 2005 Budgeted use of Balances 0 Budgeted Position March 2006 5,667
In accordance with CIPFA guidance, the Executive Manager Financial Services has reviewed the level of these reserves and balances to ensure that they are currently sufficient and that they will remain adequate over the medium term.
6. Impact of Large Scale Voluntary Transfer of the Housing Stock
Members have agreed to hold a tenant ballot on transferring the Council’s housing stock to an independent Housing Association. The vote on this Large Scale Voluntary Transfer (LSVT) of the housing stock is due to take place in late 2005. The projections contained in the MTFS have been drawn up on the basis that LSVT does not take place. Consequently separate consideration needs to be given to the scenario where LSVT does occur.
The transfer of the housing landlord function would have a significant impact on the remaining parts of the Council. In particular the GRA currently provides services to the HRA worth around £2.8m per year. This covers a wide range of areas including insurance, grounds and landscape maintenance, corporate and democratic core costs and central support services.
Under LSVT the Council could no longer charge this expenditure to the HRA and these costs would have to be reduced as far as possible. This reduction in costs would be achieved by a combination of factors including TUPE transfers of staff, restructuring of services, providing services to the new housing association and stopping services that are no longer required following LSVT. Any residual costs that remain would then be financed by the investment income on the capital receipt that the Council will receive from LSVT. Taking into account all of these factors the aim is for LSVT to have a net nil impact on the GRA.
It is intended that the level of recharges to the HRA will be reviewed during the budget setting process irrespective of whether LSVT takes place or not.
7. Key Features and Limitations of the Forecast
This forecast has been produced for planning purposes to enable the Council to take a more strategic view of the present and near future, and to provide a framework in which our long term objectives can be financed. It will assist in addressing issues in a time period not constrained by the usual one year budget cycles, and will enable opportunities and problems to be identified at an earlier stage than would otherwise be the case.
Clearly the further we look to the future the more uncertainties become apparent. Changes in political control, grant regimes, capping regulations and so on can all conspire to cloud the clarity of the future.
In terms of national factors, this forecast does not take into account the potential impact of local government reorganisation, changes to grant funding arrangements, and movements in interest rates. This is because both the timing and the impact of these factors cannot be known at the current time.
In recent years the Council has actively pursued external funding opportunities to deliver new and improved services. However there is a risk that if the external funding runs out then the Council will be left with a difficult choice of either incurring extra costs or reducing service levels to their previous position. This is a potential issue on both revenue and capital across a wide range of service areas including Benefits, Regeneration and CCTV.
In general terms financial pressures and issues from the current financial year have not been taken into account in the projections. These factors are normally picked up through the budget setting process. This includes issues such as the increase in oil prices that has taken place over the last year.
The Council has agreed to move to a system of alternate weekly collections for refuse and recycling. The primary reason for the introduction of this new approach is to reduce the volume of refuse being taken to landfill and to dramatically increase the volume of recycling in the district. The financial impact of this new system has not been quantified in the forecasts but will be assessed as part of the budget setting process.
There have been significant changes in the regulations concerning benefits payments and subsidy over the last few years and as a result the process for estimating budget levels needs to be reviewed. The potential outcome of this review is not yet known.
SECTION 3 – THE HOUSING REVENUE ACCOUNT (HRA)
Members have agreed to hold a tenant ballot on transferring the Council’s housing stock to an independent Housing Association. The vote on this Large Scale Voluntary Transfer (LSVT) of the housing stock is due to take place in late 2005.
If the LSVT does takes place then the Council will transfer all of its housing stock and would no longer maintain a Housing Revenue Account. Consequently this medium term strategy sets out the financial forecast position for the HRA for 2005/2006 to 2007/2008 on the basis that stock transfer does not take place and the Council retains ownership of the housing stock. The projections set out below are a summary of the information presented in the HRA Business Plan 2005 that was published in July 2005.
1. BASIS OF EXPENDITURE FORECAST
The overall projection on expenditure is that it will increase by 2.0% in both 2006-07 and 2007-08. The main factors that explain this increase are set out below.
(a) Housing Subsidy The HRA is in a negative subsidy position that means that rather than receiving grant income it has to remit money to the government in relation to subsidy.
The level of this payment is calculated through a complex subsidy formula that takes into account a wide range of different information. The estimates contained in the HRA Business Plan project that the level of these payments will increase by £232,000 in 2006-07 and a further £246,000 in 2007-08, which represents rises of over 7% per annum.
These increases in subsidy payable are the single most important factor in explaining why HRA expenditure is rising at a time when the number of dwellings is reducing. These payments are determined by the government through the national HRA subsidy system, and so are outside the direct control of the Council.
(b) Management costs The HRA Business Plan assumes that Management costs are fixed in relation to stock numbers. In other words Management costs will not automatically fall as stock numbers reduce. The projections show these costs increasing over time in line with estimated inflation rates at around 2.9% per annum. This equates to increases of £103,000 in 2006-07 and £105,000 in 2007-08.
This factor is the second most important reason in explaining why HRA expenditure is rising over the medium term.
(c) Maintenance costs The HRA Business Plan assumes that reductions in stock numbers will lead to corresponding reductions in Maintenance costs. However this position is countered by the impact of inflation on the unit costs of maintenance. When these factors are taken together the overall situation is that maintenance costs are expected to remain fairly static over the next 2 years.
(d) All other expenditure There is a wide range of other expenditure within the HRA outside of management and maintenance costs and HRA subsidy payable as covered in items (a) to (c) above. This includes the net impact of capital charges, other revenue spending, and miscellaneous expenses. This expenditure heading is projected to increase gradually over time by 0.3% in 2006/07 and 0.2% in 2007/08.
2. BASIS OF RESOURCES FORECAST
The vast majority of HRA income comes from rents. The Council has adopted the Government’s Rent Restructuring formula, and it is this formula that now determines the level of rent increases each year.
The aim of rent restructuring is to have all local authorities and registered social landlords (RSL’s) charging rents on the same basis to provide transparency for tenants in the social rented sector. Under this reform rents are calculated using a nationally applied formulae based on 70% relative regional earnings and 30% relative capital values rather than the basis of setting rents commensurate with the cost of delivering the service.
For the purposes of this forecast RPI/GDP used within the Government’s rent restructuring formula is assumed to be 2.69% per annum, and it is further assumed that rents will increase in real terms by 1% subject to individual rents being capped to RPI plus 0.5% plus or minus £2 per week.
However, assumed reductions in stock numbers of 286 per year due to the continued sales of Council Houses has the affect of reducing the rental base. The net effect of these factors taken together is that there will be an estimated reduction in rental income of £159,000 in 2006/07 and £193,000 in 2007/08.
There are moderate increases in other non rental income projected over the next few years of £28,000 in 2006/07 and £29,000 in 2007/08. However the overall bottom line position on income is a projected reduction of 0.7% and 0.9% respectively over the next 2 years.
3. HRA FORECASTS
The following table shows a summary of the projections on the HRA over the medium term.
The HRA Business Plan projects a surplus of £270,000 for 2005-06. However after this year the projection is for a steadily increasing deficit position to develop. The deficit projected for 2006-07 is £225,000 and the deficit for 2007-08 is £761,000. This deteriorating position is a direct result of income levels falling due to lower stock levels, while expenditure is increasing mainly from higher subsidy payments and rising management costs.
The cumulative position taking all three years together is for a net shortfall of £716,000. The HRA is not allowed to run at a deficit and so action will need to be taken to address this position.
HRA Business Plan Forecast
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
£000 £000 % £000 %
Expenditure: HRA Subsidy payable 3,185 3,417 7.3% 3,663 7.2% Management costs 3,493 3,596 2.9% 3,701 2.9% Maintenance costs 4,094 4,098 0.1% 4,101 0.1% All other expenditure 7,372 7,397 0.3% 7,415 0.2%
Expenditure forecast 18,144 18,508 2.0% 18,880 2.0%
Resources: Rent income 15,900 15,741 -1.0% 15,548 -1.2% Other income 2,514 2,542 1.1% 2,571 1.1%
Resources forecast 18,414 18,283 -0.7% 18,119 -0.9%
Shortfall / Surplus (-) -270 225 761
Cumulative position 716
4. HRA RESERVES AND BALANCES
The level of HRA Balances at the start of the 2005/06 financial year was £758,000. In accordance with CIPFA Guidance the Executive Manager Financial Services has reviewed the level of these balances to ensure that they are currently sufficient. His findings are that it is advisable that the HRA working balance should not be allowed to fall below a minimum of £500,000.
Clearly the three year cumulative net shortfall identified above of £716,000 would mean that the level of balances would fall below the minimum £500,000 level. This means that if the Council is to continue to provide Housing there will have to be a fundamental review of expenditure and income to move the HRA into a balanced financial position.
5. FUTURE PROSPECTS
Given this difficult financial position it will be a challenging target to continue to improve services if the Council retains ownership of its housing stock. While the Council will be able to achieve the Decent Homes Standard by 2010, it seems likely that there would be only limited opportunities to meet tenant aspirations for further investment. This financial situation has been a major reason why the Council has agreed to hold a tenant ballot on LSVT in late 2005. LSVT would offer greater opportunities to deliver higher levels of investment in the housing stock and develop regeneration initiatives for housing estates in Skelmersdale.
There are a number of obstacles that would make it difficult to move the HRA into a more balanced budget position. Firstly there are significant areas of the HRA that are not directly controlled by the Council but are determined by government decisions. These include HRA subsidy payments that can be subject to significant change as the government alters the underlying formula. The government’s rent restructuring formula will also determine future rent levels.
In addition, following previous cost reduction exercises and rationalisation of housing functions there is a limited scope for significant further efficiency savings. Finally ongoing Council House sales under Right to Buy legislation are continuously eroding the rent income base.
The HRA Business Plan sets out three main actions that could be considered to promote financial stability in the HRA:
• Reduce management cost levels by around £100,000 per annum. This reduction programme would be based on non front line posts and other non landlord areas e.g. tenant participation • Review of housing maintenance expenditure and costs and aim to reduce them by £100,000 per annum • Review the level of corporate recharges to try and achieve significant reductions of at least £500,000 over a two year period
6. KEY FEATURES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE FORECAST
The forecast contained in this section is a summary of the HRA Business Plan. By their very nature, all plans rest on a set of assumptions. The most important assumptions that have been made relate to the HRA subsidy position, volume of right to buy sales, the fixed and variable nature of costs, inflation and interest rates, and void levels.
The assumptions and data used in the Business plan was subject to an independent validation by Price Waterhouse Coopers. This validation took place to ensure that the baseline data was correct and that the forecast assumptions and calculations were within acceptable and reasonable ranges.
SECTION 4 – THE CAPITAL PROGRAMME
The Council agreed its three year Housing capital programme in February 2005, and its three year programme for Other Services in March 2005.
1. The Housing Public Sector Programme
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Total £000 £000 £000 £000
Cost of Capital Schemes Original programme 4,602 4,035 3,796 12,433 Slippage from previous year 1,475 - - 1,475 Current budget 6,077 4,035 3,796 13,908
Financed by: Major Repairs Allowance 4,274 3,765 3,646 11,685 Housing Capital Allocation 206 148 50 404 HRA Contributions 122 122 100 344 Slippage from previous year 1,475 - - 1,475 Total 6,077 4,035 3,796 13,908
The original programme for 2005-06 was based on expenditure of £4.602m. This has been updated to include slippage from the previous year’s programme of £1.475m to reflect the current budget of £6.077m.
The Major Repairs Allowance (MRA) is a government grant that is ring fenced specifically for capital expenditure on Council housing. The MRA provides the core funding for the Housing Public Sector capital programme. This funding is projected to decline over time in line with the anticipated reduction in the number of Council dwellings through right to buy sales and demolitions.
The level and composition of capital expenditure in future years will be reviewed as part of the budget setting process taking into account MRA allocations, the Housing capital allocation, availability of other resources, and the need for capital expenditure to ensure the Council meets the Decent Homes Standard by 2010.
2. The Other Services Capital Programme
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Total £000 £000 £000 £000
Cost of Schemes by Division Non Divisional Items 130 150 150 430 Financial Services 182 30 30 242 Assistant Chief Executive 462 50 50 562 Street Scene Unit 35 0 0 35 Regeneration & Property 2,607 2,353 1,976 6,936 Community Services 917 629 242 1,788 Planning and Development 670 170 30 870 Housing Private Sector 1,425 1,445 1,666 4,536 Slippage from previous year 3,115 - - 3,115 Total 9,543 4,827 4,144 18,514
Financed by: Capital Receipts and Internal 1,505 1,500 1,500 4,505 Contributions Housing Capital Allocation 677 732 1,130 2,539 Capital Grants 3,036 2,155 1,872 7,063 External Contributions 830 460 140 1,430 Slippage from previous year 3,115 - - 3,115 (Surplus) or deficit of 380 (20) (498) (138) resources Total 9,543 4,827 4,144 18,514
The original programme for 2005-06 was based on expenditure of £6.428m. This has been updated to include slippage from the previous year’s programme of £3.115m to reflect the current budget of £9.543m.
The programme figures for later years tend to be subject to change as levels of expenditure and resources are not certain. A prudent approach is used to construct these budgets and in particular resources are only recognised when there is relative certainty that they will be achieved. Experience suggests that the actual levels of capital expenditure and resources will be higher than the levels currently shown in the programme.
3. Retained capital receipts for Housing Capital Expenditure
The Council had no long term borrowing at 31st March 2004. This position has enabled it to benefit from capital financing rules that allow a greater proportion of the receipts generated from Council House sales to be kept rather than paid over to central government. These retained receipts are available to be spent on housing private and public sector capital expenditure. The value of these receipts at 31st March 2005 that had not been allocated to schemes was £4.106m. It is also expected that over the next two years a further £2.5m of receipts will be generated giving a total estimated amount of £6.606m. However it should be recognised that the capital receipts that are generated from Council House sales can be volatile, and so these figures are potentially subject to significant change.
This funding stream has not been included in the capital programmes shown above as a decision concerning its use will not be made until the outcome of the tenant vote on LSVT.
4. The Capital Programme setting process for 2006-07
Each year the capital programme is reviewed to take account of new developments and more up to date information. In particular the level and composition of capital expenditure in future years will be reviewed taking into account the level of available resources, corporate priorities and developments in the Capital Strategy and Asset Management Plan.
In previous years the capital programme setting process has identified additional resources that have become available. There has then been a bidding process in line with the capital strategy to allocate these resources to new capital schemes.
However the current picture for 2006-07 suggests that there will only be a limited scope for developing new schemes. This is because ongoing schemes (such as Disabled Facilities Grants and the Commutation Adjustment) that were approved in the current year’s programme will require almost all of the new resources that will become available in 2006-07. Consequently the prospects for developing new schemes appear bleak.
The level of resources available for new schemes will be reviewed in detail during the budget setting process taking account of current and anticipated future levels of capital receipts.
Given this situation it is important that opportunities are taken to secure external resources and to work in partnership with other organisations to maximise the capital investment that takes place. For example the new leisure trust arrangement will see capital investment of £3.5m in leisure centres over the next 15 years.
Office accommodation issues are a matter that should be given specific consideration during the capital programme setting process. This includes spending pressures on the revenue and capital budgets for repairs and maintenance and corporate property investment. It also includes consideration of the potential relocation of offices to a new site.
A further option to generate funding for the capital programme would be to take out unsupported borrowing and this issue is explored in the next section.
5. Borrowing to support the Capital Programme
The Council repaid all of its long term borrowing in March 2004 and has subsequently not taken out any new long term borrowing.
In April 2004 the government introduced a new prudential capital framework to replace the previous system of capital controls. The basic principle of the new system is that local authorities are free to invest so long as their capital spending plans are affordable, prudent and sustainable. In the new system the decision to invest rests with a local authority. However it will be restrained by a duty to ensure that any investment is affordable and represents a prudent and sustainable level of capital investment.
There are two types of borrowing in the new system – supported and unsupported. Supported borrowing is based on capital allocations from the government. These allocations reflect the level of borrowing that the government is willing to support. In other words the government assumes that local authorities will take out borrowing at the level of the capital allocation and it provides revenue grant support to cover the principal repayments and interest costs of this debt.
The Council has received Housing capital allocations for supported borrowing of £0.910m for 2004-05 and £0.883m for 2005-06, which is a total of £1.793m. These allocations have been built into the capital programme in full. A decision will need to be made during the current year on how these allocations will be funded. The potential options include borrowing, use of general or ring fenced capital receipts, reducing expenditure so that the allocations are not fully used, or a combination of these approaches. This decision will be influenced, amongst other factors, by the LSVT outcome and treasury management considerations.
Under the prudential system local authorities are also able to take out unsupported borrowing that is not backed by capital allocations. In this case the revenue costs of the debt will have to be met by the Council without any government support.
Given the resource shortfalls identified in both the GRA and the HRA, the affordability criteria will place a real constraint on new borrowing for capital investment purposes. However this funding source can be considered during the capital programme setting process for 2006-07 as a means of generating additional resources to finance new capital schemes. In particular this could be appropriate for developing “Invest to Save” type schemes. These are schemes that deliver revenue efficiencies and savings that would help to pay the interest and principal costs of the borrowing.
6. The impact of Large Scale Voluntary Transfer of the Housing Stock
The capital programme figures set out above have been based on the Council retaining ownership of its housing stock. The outcome of the tenant vote on LSVT will only be known towards the end of 2005. If there is a yes vote then this will have a number of implications for the capital programme.
Firstly, LSVT would mean that the Council would no longer have its housing stock and so the housing public sector capital programme would come to an end.
LSVT would also mean that the Council would no longer generate its own capital receipts from disposals of Council Houses under Right to Buy regulations. Currently the programme includes £1.5m of capital receipts per year that mainly comes from Council house sales. Under LSVT the Council would enter into an agreement to share the receipts that arise from House sales with the new Housing Association. The details of this arrangement are still subject to negotiation and have not yet been finalised. The budget for capital receipts will need to be reassessed when the arrangements have been agreed.
Finally, LSVT could have a significant impact on the level of the Housing capital allocation (supported borrowing) that the Council receives in future years. LSVT could significantly reduce the level of the Housing capital allocation, which would have a direct impact on the funding of certain Housing private sector schemes that are currently heavily financed from this source.
APPENDIX MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL FACTORS
Main factors considered and evaluated in the report • Pay increases and increments • Contract inflation • Temporary and one off items in the 2005-06 budget • Commutation adjustment • Growth in external grant support • Council Tax income • Reserves and balances • Projections from the HRA Business Plan • Housing Subsidy • HRA Management, Maintenance and other expenditure • Housing Rents and other income • Capital expenditure and resources • Retained capital receipts for Housing capital expenditure
Factors mentioned in the report but not evaluated – • Changes to the terms and conditions of the Local Government Pension Scheme • Job Evaluation and Equal Pay audits • Net impact of the new statutory concessionary fares scheme • Council tax revaluation • Potential changes to grant funding arrangements • Revenue growth and savings • Local Authority Business Growth Incentive scheme • Changes in political control • Movements in interest rates • Current year financial pressures and issues such as increases in oil prices • Schemes where the Council may incur costs when external funding is no longer available • Benefits payments and grant subsidy • Alternate weekly collection • Changes in Rent Restructuring rules or the HRA subsidy formula • Local government review and regional government • Office accommodation issues • Borrowing to support the capital programme • Large Scale Voluntary Transfer of the Housing Stock
Other material factors • Joining the single European currency and its effect on interest rates • Potential to recover VAT on off street car parking charges • Potential increase in costs if VAT de minimis level exceeded