Post-Alleghenian Deformation of the Shawangunk Ridge in NY and NJ
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Century of Forest Stewardship in New Jersey 1905-2005
A Century of Forest Stewardship in New Jersey 1905-2005 Researched and written by Kevin Wright © Kevin Wright 2005 An Introduction to New Jersey’s Natural Parks and Forest Reservations Tucked between blue-hazed mountains and the ocean shore, the State of New Jersey occupies a full cross section of the Atlantic slope with terrains and habitats that vary remarkably mile by mile. The cultural landscape is equally picturesque; what began as the most ethnically and religiously diverse colony has become the most densely populated State in the Union. Consequently a wonderful variety of plant and animal life competes on a daily basis with a spreading suburban population for space and resources. New Jersey’s virgin forests vanished by 1860, having been repeatedly cut over. With such widespread deforestation, even the Highlands “presented a perfectly bare appearance.” By 1900, about 46% of New Jersey’s land area, amounting to two million acres, remained woodland, though its condition was generally poor. Though this forest area was close to lumber markets, its overall value was insignificant, due mainly to repeated and uncontrolled destruction by forest fires. The first generation of professional American foresters, trained mainly in the carefully managed forest reserves of Germany, recommended the practice of scientific forestry to restore the exhausted condition of New Jersey’s remnant woodlands after centuries of exploitation. They believed that even the poor sandy soils of the Pine Barrens might yield crops of “commercially valuable trees … at a more rapid rate than is the rule on the average forest soil in the East, due to a favorable climate.”1 They not only advocated the creation of an organized firefighting force, but also a system of state-owned demonstration forests to promote reforestation. -
Delaware Water Gap
Delaware Water Gap NATIONAL RECREATION AREA PENNSYLVANIA . NEW JERSEY WHERE TO STAY Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, completed facilities are not yet in operation at terrace at the foot of Mount Minsi near the lower authorized by Congress in 1965, will preserve a a particular site, plan to return when you can end of the parking area, there is an unobstructed Food, lodging, gasoline, souvenirs, and other large and relatively unspoiled area astride the visit in safety and comfort. view across the river. Exhibits at the terrace ex items are available in towns and communities river boundary of Pennsylvania and New Jersey. plain how this mountain range was formed and from Port Jervis, N. Y., at the upper end of the Within easy driving range of several large metro- help you to understand rock formations visible national recreation area, to Portland, Pa., a few KITTATINNY POINT is on the New Jersey side politan areas, it will provide facilities and in the side of Mount Tammany. These million-year- miles below the proposed dam. No camping or of the Water Gap between Int. 80 and the Dela services for many types of recreational activities old rocks are constantly being changed by the picnicking facilities are available in the area ware River. A parking overlook is at the foot of and for interpretation of the area's scenic, forces of erosion. Alternate freezing and thawing this season, but they are available in nearby Mount Tammany on the opposite side of the scientific, and historical values. The forest cover of water in the crevices and plants forcing their State and private developments. -
The Nature of Boulder-Rich Deposits in the Upper Big Flat Brook Drainage, Sussex County, New Jersey
Middle States Geographer, 2009, 42: 33-43 THE NATURE OF BOULDER-RICH DEPOSITS IN THE UPPER BIG FLAT BROOK DRAINAGE, SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Gregory A. Pope, Andrew J. Temples, Sean I. McLearie, Joanne C. Kornoelje, and Thomas J. Glynn Department of Earth & Environmental Studies Montclair State University 1 Normal Avenue Montclair, New Jersey, 07043 ABSTRACT: The upper reaches of the Big Flat Brook drainage, northwest of Kittatinny Mountain, contain a variety of glacial, pro-glacial, and periglacial deposits from the Late Quaternary. The area is dominated by recessional moraines and ubiquitous ground moraine, along with meltwater deposits, drumlins, and possible post- glacial periglacial features. We have identified a curious boulder-rich deposit in the vicinity of Lake Ocquittunk and Lake Wapalanne on upper Big Flat Brook. The area where these boulder deposits occur is mapped (1:24,000 surficial geology) as till. As mapped and observed, larger cobbles and boulders within the till are quartz-pebble conglomerate, quartzite, sandstone, and shale. The boulder-rich deposits differ from the typical till, however. Unlike the local till, which is more mixed in lithology, the boulder deposits are nearly exclusively Shawangunk conglomerate. The deposits are discontinuous, but appear to occur at a topographic level above the meltwater stream terraces. The boulders in the deposits lie partially embedded in soil, but are very closely spaced. The boulders range in size from ~20cm to over 100cm, and present a subrounded to subangular shape. There appears to be a fabric orientation of the boulders, NE-SW, with subsidiary orientations. As the boulder deposits differ from other mapped features in the area, we attempt to ascertain the origin for the deposits. -
Nj-Tocks-Island-Nra.Pdf
TOC:K:S ISL .AN"D N ...A. TION ...A.I... R ECRE...A.TION ...A.RE...A. A Proposal I~~~~~.~~~~~i~i_i~i~~i~i~~!~~~area must come soon ~~~~(U;~.[t'~WI on-th.e dp.m ~ (ar a/ouR. for to aI/OIl' the nu:.r..e~ iJIt!f.Lilllt!rlJl::~(.ttion QHd planl1lng to IOff hchrnd tllP resen.;'rr 1j::frrJi m!lJftt.~sIi#-fn the IO::Js of this oll/slalic/lflR :W!H'tf'tmfi tat:ttit:r 8~to[!Wh8'. --:Eac7i7ifTlie biUff introduced in the COIlt;ress /0 authorize the rf!(rl!ation area states that the!lill!.!. i6' propOJM!..d...:..l.!l order 1(1 further the purpo::;es' of the 1961 Delau'ore· BlTsin ComlxlC't. They state further that the admu!.!.stratlOfL or/he Ft,!feral responsd7rhUes UH.~I! lcith tilt' p I shall be fn • ft1li ulellt"it Comrx1ci. "=T.I . , t 1(1 ecrca/UHl Rill.'! (l r(' IUO·°l'f'fcenl intUIt' -wid flu IlJNrr£:if Cimpacl as approl'ed by th-; Congrr '1 1961-' I'"m ~t"terr: nr- b) Ih'!aware HIV r B.. n l miSSion lJ('fiJrt, tht, . '01 on I Pari ~ubc mmlttee of the lIml It or nd In ular \fhllrB Sulxom nu~a States Department af thfi1 nterio T' IJ'I tt ,",unc M. %4 National Park S ervice 1965 • CONTENTS T ilE SPLEN DOR OF A 37-M1Ll:. LAKE recreation experience 1O an estimated 10 winding through the ext raordinaril y beautiful million visitors annua ll y ... and big enough Introduction to the Proposal 2 Delaware Ri ve r Valley just upstream from to preserve the natural scene for all time. -
Resource Plan Species Also Occur Within the Refuge Boundaries
ITALLKILL RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Sussex, New Jersey ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1992 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM WALLKILL RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Sussex, New Jersey ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1992 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEW AND APPROVALS WALLKILL RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Sussex, New Jersey ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1992 L-cW^-/ Refuge Manager Date Associate Manager Review Date Date INTRODUCTION The Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge was established on November 16, 1990 by authorizing legislation P.L. 101-593 Sec. 107 of H.R. 3338. The Refuge presently has an approved acquisition boundary and will encompass approximately 7,500 acres along the Wallkill River in northwestern New Jersey. It is situated in parts of Vernon, Wantage, and Hardyston Townships of Sussex County, New Jersey and Warwick Township in Orange County, New York. New York City is within one hour's drive. The primary purpose of the Refuge is to preserve and enhance the Refuge lands and waters in a manner that will conserve the natural diversity of fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for present and future generations; to conserve and enhance populations of fish, wildlife, and plants within the Refuge, including populations of black ducks and other waterfowl, raptors, passerines, and marsh and water birds; to protect and enhance the water quality of aquatic habitats within the Refuge; to fulfill international treaty obligations of the United States with respect to fish and wildlife and their habitats; and to provide opportunities for compatible scientific research, environmental education, and fish and wildlife-oriented recreation. -
Bedrock Geologic Map of New Jersey
O O O 74 00’ BEDROCK GEOLOGIC MAP 75 00’ 74 30’ OF NEW JERSEY DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS SUSSEX Sedimentary Rocks Franklin CENOZOIC PASSAIC Mahwah Holocene: beach and Newton 41O 00’ estuarine deposits Andover Paleogene and Neogene: sand, silt, clay Delaware Water Gap Boonton BERGEN MESOZOIC WARREN Paterson Cretaceous: sand, silt, clay Hackensack Jurassic: siltstone, shale, Belvidere MORRIS sandstone, conglomerate ESSEX Morristown Triassic: siltstone, shale, HUDSON Newark sandstone, conglomerate Jersey City Gladstone Phillipsburg PALEOZOIC UNION Devonian: conglomerate, sandstone, Elizabeth shale, limestone Somerville Carteret Silurian: conglomerate, sandstone, Milford shale, limestone HUNTERDON New Brunswick 40O 30’ Ordovician: shale, limestone Flemington SOMERSET Cambrian: limestone, sandstone MIDDLESEX Igneous and Metamorphic Rocks MESOZOIC Jurassic and Triassic: basalt MERCER Jurassic: diabase Freehold MONMOUTH PALEOZOIC N Trenton Asbury Park Ordovician and Cambrian: schist, gneiss MESOPROTEROZOIC marble gneiss, granite O Mount Holly 40 00’ DESCRIPTION OF MAP SYMBOLS Toms River limit of late Wisconsinan glaciation Camden OCEAN limit of Illinoian glaciation BURLINGTON limit of pre-Illinoian glaciation Woodbury CAMDEN GLOUCESTER SALEM Salem O O 39 30’ ATLANTIC 39 30’ Bridgeton Mays Landing ICAL A OG ND L EO W CUMBERLAND G A T Y E E R Atlantic City S S R U E J R V E W E Y N 1835 0 5 10 15 20 mi Department of Environmental Protection CAPE MAY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL AND WATER SURVEY 0 10 20 30 km Cape May 2017 Court House scale 1:1,000,000 39O 00’ O O O O O 76 00’ 75 30’ 75 00’ 74 30’ 74 00’ BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY For an area of its size, New Jersey has a uniquely diverse and interesting basalt and diabase are more resistant to erosion than the enclosing sandstone geology. -
HISTORY of NEW JERSEY COASTLINE C. F. Wlcker Chief, Engineering Division, Philadelphia District Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
CHAPTER 33 HISTORY OF NEW JERSEY COASTLINE C. F. WlCker Chief, EngIneering Division, Philadelphia District Corps of EngIneers, Department of the Army Philadelphia, Pennsylvania INTRODUCTION The New Jersey coast probably is the most important recreational asset in the nation. This is due in part to the nearby densely populated metropolitan areas that experience unpleasantly hot and humid weather during the summer months. New York and its satellite communities, having a combined population of approximately 13 million, is only 50 miles from the nearest and 160 miles from the most remote of the 57 resort towns that dot the 125-mile length of New Jersey seashore. The Philadelphia metropolitan area, with a population of approximately 4 million, lies 60 miles from the nearest resort and only 86 miles from the farthest. Fig. 1 shows the geographic setting of the seashore area. But it is not merely geographic proximity to large numbers of people and the compulsion of uncomfortable weather at home that attracts 4 million vacationers and a great many one-day excursionists to the New Jersey seashore resorts each year. Nearly all of the 125 miles of shoreline is a satisfactory sandy bathing beach, and about 80% of it is open to ,the public at no charge. The ocean is not polluted, its temperature is approximately 700 throughout the summer months, and its surf is not dangerous. The 57 resort communities collectively offer a great variety of accommodations ranging from luxurious hotels to modest boarding houses and tourist camps, and the surroundings include highly developed areas, as at At lantic City, as well as localities remaining in a natural condition. -
Environmental Resource Inventory
Environmental Resource Inventory City of Summit Union County, New Jersey Reeves-Reed Arboretum A Collaborative Effort by City of Summit and Passaic River Coalition 2011 Acknowledgements City of Summit City Hall, 512 Springfield Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 Phone: 908-273-6400, Website: www.cityofsummit.org Jordan Glatt, Mayor Common Council Dave A. Bomgaars, President Ellen K. Dickson Nuris Portunodo Thomas Getzendanner Michael J. Vernotico Richard J. Madden Stephen P. Murphy Environmental Commission Marian G. Glenn, Chair Ervin Bales Marjorie Fox Amy Cairns Harrison John Kilby Christine Lijoi Judith Mandelbaum David Naidu Beth Kinney, Director, Department of Community Services Jin Blades, Administrative Manager, Department of Community Services Passaic River Coalition A nonprofit watershed association created in 1969 to serve as an advisor to the citizens, governments, and businesses of the Passaic River Basin on land and water resource management and public health. www.passaicriver.org Ella F. Filippone, Executive Director Anne L. Kruger, Ph.D., Senior Scientist Allyson Salisbury, Environmental Specialist Jason Chen, Summer Intern Alicja Trzopek, Summer Intern Environmental Resource Inventory City of Summit, Union County, New Jersey 2011 Table of Contents Section Page Preface i Accomplishments of the Summit Environmental Commission ii I. Introduction to Summit, New Jersey 1 II. Geology 4 III. Geography 8 IV. Water Resources 12 Surface Water 12 Ground Water 15 Recharge Areas 17 Flood Plains 19 Riparian Buffers 19 Water Supplies 21 Water Quality 22 Preservation of Water Resources in Summit 27 V. Wetlands 30 Wetlands in Summit 31 VI. Climate and Weather 34 VII. Soils 37 Importance of Soil 37 Soil Characteristics and Properties 37 Soil Erosion 38 Soil Types in Summit 40 VIII. -
Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area
CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CRM VOLUME 25 NO. 3 2002 tie u^m Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cultural Resources PUBLISHED BY THE CRM magazine's 25th anniversary year NATIONAL PARK SERVICE VOLUME 25 NO. 3 2002 Information for parks, Federal agencies, Contents ISSN 1068-4999 Indian tribes, States, local governments, and the private sector that promotes and maintains high standards for pre Saved from the Dam serving and managing cultural resources In the Beginning 3 Upper Delaware Valley Cottages— Thomas E. Solon A Simple Regional Dwelling Form . .27 DIRECTOR Kenneth F. Sandri Fran R Mainella From "Wreck-reation" to Recreation Area— Camp Staff Breathes New Life ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP A Superintendent's Perspective 4 into Old Cabin 29 AND PARTNERSHIPS Bill Laitner Chuck Evertz and Katherine H. Stevenson Larry J. Smotroff In-Tocks-icated—The Tocks Island MANAGING EDITOR Dam Project 5 Preserving and Interpreting Historic John Robbins Richard C. Albert Houses—VIPs Show the Way 31 EDITOR Leonard R. Peck Sue Waldron "The Minisink"—A Chronicle of the Upper Delaware Valley 7 Yesterday and Today—Planting ASSOCIATE EDITOR Dennis Bertland for Tomorrow 33 Janice C. McCoy Larry Hilaire GUEST EDITOR Saving a Few, Before Losing Them All— Thomas E. Solon A Strategy for Setting Priorities 9 Searching for the Old Mine Road ... .35 Zehra Osman Alicia C. Batko ADVISORS David Andrews Countrysides Lost and Found— Bit by Bit—Curation in a National Editor, NPS Joan Bacharach Discovering Cultural Landscapes 14 Recreation Area 36 Curator, NPS Hugh C. -
Princeton Day School Journal Winter 1976 Princeton Day School Journal
PRINCETON DAY SCHOOL JOURNAL WINTER 1976 PRINCETON DAY SCHOOL JOURNAL W in t e r , 1976 Vol. 8, No. 1 1 From The Headmaster E ditors: Douglas O. McClure Phillips B. vanDusen 2 The Princeton Day School Parents’ Association Virginia H. Taylor Barbara H. Johnson Markell M. Shriver ’46 5 Two-Way Street Mar)r Murdoch and Adela Wilmerding 7 Parents And Advisors Lawrence Q. Kuser 9 A Student View Jeb Bums 76 10 Chris Reeve ’70 11 Challenge Grant and Annual Fund 12 Some Reunion Classes 13 Frances Markley Roberts 14 The Fall Sports Scene Phillips B. vanDusen 16 Alumni Children 17 Commencement 18 Alumni Notes Photo Credits: Debbie Fath ’76, front and back covers; Mark Burrows ’77, page 1; Benjamin Reeve ’71, pages 3, 10; Cory Fischer ’76, page 5; Andrea Avery ”77, page 7; Chris Jensen ’76, page 9; The Link, pages 13, 16; Eleanor Kuser ’76, top page 14; Anne Dennison ’77, bottom page 14, bottom page 15; Andrew Hildick-Smith '77, top page 15; Bob Denby, Front and back covers: Halloween Parade page 17; Julie Stabler ’76, bottom page 30 From The Headmaster . Douglas O. McClure To describe a school as a community is obviously playing. Their response underscored, as far as I was a truism, yet I know no better way to describe what concerned, how fortunate Princeton Day School is to a successful school really is. Its goals should reflect have reached that level of mutual support and under the agreement of all groups who are part of it about standing of how to function as a community which the what they want the school to be: that intangible factor variety of Parents’ Association activities represents. -
Freshwater Fisheries Annual Report 2016 Appendices
APPENDIX A Stream Electrofishing Survey Data (2016) This section of the report includes stream survey data completed by the Bureau of Freshwater Fisheries in 2016. All surveys, unless specifically noted otherwise, are sampled in accordance to the Bureau’s established stream sampling protocol which is consistent with EPA’s Rapid Bioassement Protocol for Wadeable Streams. The Bureau’s wadeable stream survey protocol can be found in Appendix B. The Bureau also assesses in-stream and riparian conditions by performing a Habitat Assessment at the time of each survey. This assessment is consistent with the EPA Rapid Bioassessment sampling habitat assessment protocol with regional modifications (Appendix C). Basic water quality parameters are also measured. Surveys are listed alphabetically by stream name within identified watershed areas. Each survey is identified by the specific Activity by which it was funded. It is important to note, however, the use of established stream sampling protocols permits data to be used beyond the specific Activity for which they were collected. Data provided for the purposes of this report is only a summary of the individual stream survey data collected by the DFW’s Bureau of Freshwater Fisheries. All stream data collected under the Bureau’s standardized sampling protocol is entered into the Division’s FishTrack database. Appendix A of Investigations and Management of NJ’s Freshwater Fisheries Resources (2016) A–0 Stream Survey Data Stream Surveys in the Upper Delaware (North) & Wallkill Region (Shimers Brook to Paulins Kill and Wallkill River) Beerskill Creek Fish Species Number Length (mm) Date: 08/04/2016 County: Sussex Bass, Largemouth 1 69 - 69 Township: Sandyston Twp. -
Popular Measurement 2 1
Measuring Mountains Ryan Bowles Computer Adapetive Technologies Ryan Bowles at end of trail. I hiked the entire Appalachian Trail in the spring and summer of 1997. I started in Georgia on Springer Mountain on March 16 and finished in Maine on top of Mount Katahdin on August 6. The Appalachian Trail is a footpath, 2160 miles long, running through woods and fields, along ridgetops and streams, through 14 states. The Trail goes up and down over many mountains, ranging in elevation from 142 feet above sea level on the Hudson River in New York, to 6643 feet on Clingman's Dome on the border of North Carolina and Ten- nessee. Every year over 2000 people attempt to hike the entire Trail in one season, a feat known as a thru-hike . Only about 10 percent are successful. Many different kinds of people try to thru-hike the Trail: old and young, fit and overweight, factory workers and company executives. Within a few weeks, though, these differences have disappeared and everyone is in nearly perfect shape. Even so, thru-hikers' perceptions about how difficult it is to climb a mountain differ because of such vari- ables as weather, tiredness, and pack weight. I was curious about the difficulty of the mountains along the Appalachian Trail, but had no way to remove these idiosyncrasies, until I came across Rasch analysis. I asked 60 people who had hiked the entire Appala- chian Trail to rate the difficulty of twenty mountains scattered Ryan and another hiker SPRING 1999 POPULAR MEASUREMENT 1 9 Mount Katahdin Bigelow Mountain Saddleback Mountain Mahoosuc Arm Wildcat Mountain South Kinsman Mountain Mount Moosilauke Stratton Mountain Mount Greylock Bear Mountain Connecticut Bear Mountain New York Kittatinny Mountain Blue Mountain Peters Mountain Pennsylvania The Priest Peters Mountain Virginia Roan Mountain E Shuckstack Mountain O Cheoah Bald Blood Mountain P Author at a high point in his journey L along the length of the Trail.