Q3 2019 Market Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Jational Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
•m No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE JATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS >_____ NAME HISTORIC BROADWAY THEATER AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT________________________ AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER <f' 300-8^9 ^tttff Broadway —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Los Angeles VICINITY OF 25 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Los Angeles 037 | CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED .^COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE .XBOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ^ENTERTAINMENT _ REUGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS 2L.YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: NAME Multiple Ownership (see list) STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF | LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDSETC. Los Angeie s County Hall of Records STREET & NUMBER 320 West Temple Street CITY. TOWN STATE Los Angeles California ! REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TiTLE California Historic Resources Inventory DATE July 1977 —FEDERAL ^JSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS office of Historic Preservation CITY, TOWN STATE . ,. Los Angeles California DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE X.GOOD 0 —RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE- —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Broadway Theater and Commercial District is a six-block complex of predominately commercial and entertainment structures done in a variety of architectural styles. The district extends along both sides of Broadway from Third to Ninth Streets and exhibits a number of structures in varying condition and degree of alteration. -
Application for the FOREMAN & CLARK BUILDING
Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC -200 8-4978 -HCM HEARING DATE: January 15, 2009 Location: 701 South Hill St. TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 9 PLACE : City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Central City 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: Central Los Angeles, CA Neighborhood Council: Downtown Los Angeles 90012 Legal Description: FR4 of Mueller Subdivision of the North ½ of Block 26 Ord’s Survey PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the FOREMAN & CLARK BUILDING REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER/ Kyung Ku Cho c/o Young Ju Kwon APPLICANT: 3200 Wilshire Blvd. #1100 Los Angeles, CA 90010 OWNER’S Robert Chattel REPRESENTATIVE: Chattel Architecture, Planning, and Preservation 13417 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA 94123 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10(c)4 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal may warrant further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings. S. GAIL GOLDBERG, AICP Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] ________________________ Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: November, 2008 Historic-Cultural Monument Application ZIMAS Report 701 S. Hill Street. CHC-2008-4978-HCM Page 2 of 2 SUMMARY Built in 1929 and located in the downtown area, this 13-story commercial building exhibits character-defining features of Art Deco-Gothic architecture. -
5410 WILSHIRE BLVD. AVAILABLE Los Angeles, CA 90036
MIRACLE MILE DISTRICT RETAIL SPACE 5410 WILSHIRE BLVD. AVAILABLE Los Angeles, CA 90036 For more information, contact: GABE KADOSH KENT BUTLER COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Lic. 01486779 Lic. 02041579 865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3500 +1 213 861 3386 +1 213 861 3349 Los Angeles, CA 90017 [email protected] [email protected] www.colliers.com PROPERTY OVERVIEW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION >> PROPERTY ADDRESS 5400-5420 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90036 >> M A RKE T Miracle Mile/Los Angeles >> BUILDING SIZE 80,000 SF >> LOT SIZE 58,806 SF (1.35 Acres) >> RETAIL AVAILABILITY SUITE 5404 - 1,726 SF SUITE 5406 - 1,855 SF SUITE 5416 - 3,300 SF PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS 5410 Wilshire Boulevard is a 10-story historic mixed-use building, known for its Art Deco style of architecture, consisting of 50,000 ft.² of office and 30,000 ft.² of retail. It is located in the rapidly growing Miracle Mile District of Los Angeles, minutes from LACMA, El Rey Theatre, La Brea Tar Pits, and The Petersen Automotive Museum. The property is well-positioned along the Wilshire Corridor, just west of La Brea Avenue and governed by two historic overlay zones. The building boasts unobstructed city and mountain views, an elegant lobby with Concierge and on-site parking with valet service. In 2000, the Los Angeles Conservancy gave the building its Preservation Award for the meticulous craftsmanship in the building’s renovation. 2 | 5410 Wilshire Boulevard Colliers International | 3 SITE PLAN SUITE 5406 | 1,855 SF with ± 628 SF Mezzanine Available Now Second-gen restaurant -
PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40Th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42Nd Street), Borough of Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission September 23, 1980, Designation List 137 LP-1127 PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42nd Street), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1917-19; architects Warren & Wetmore. Landmark Site: The property bounded by a line running easward parallel with the northern curb line of East 40th Street, a line running northward to the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, parallel with the eastern wall of the viaduct, a line running westward along the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, and a line running southward parallel with the western wall of the viaduct to the point of beginning. On March 11, 1980, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Pershing Square Viaduct (Park Avenue Viaduct) and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 9). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Located at Park Avenue and 42nd Street, tfie Pershing Square Viaduct was constructed tn 1917-1919. The viaduct extends from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal at 42nd Street, linking upper and lower Park Avenue by way of elevated drives that make a circuit around the terminal building and descend to ground level at 45th Street. Designed in 1912 by the architectural firm of Warren & Wetmore, the viaduct was conceived as part of the original 1903 plan for the station by the firm of Reed & Stem. -
Figueroa Tower 660 S
FIGUEROA TOWER 660 S. FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA UNMATCHED DOWNTOWN RETAIL VISIBILITY RETAIL RESTAURANT SPACE FOR LEASE FLAGSHIP RESTAURANT SPACE AVAILABLE For more information, please contact: Gabe Kadosh Vice President Colliers International License No. 01487669 +1 213 861 3386 [email protected] UNMATCHED DOWNTOWN RETAIL VISIBILITY 660 S. FIGUEROA STREET A postmodern mixed-use property bordered by Seventh and Figueroa streets The building consists of 12,000 square feet of ground-floor retail space—below a 283,000 SF Class A Office —including significant frontage feet of coveted frontage on major thoroughfare Figueroa. Figueroa Tower’s beautiful exterior combines the characteristics of traditional French architecture with the sleek verticality of a modern high-rise. These attributes, together with its location at the center of the Figueroa Financial Corridor, offer an aesthetic experience unlike any retail destination in all of Los Angeles. This corridor was solidified abuilding in California, the Wilshire Grand Center, opened directly across the street. This prestigious location boasts a high pedestrian volume and an unparalleled daily traffic count of 30,000. Such volume is thanks in part to being just steps away from retail supercenter FIGat7th, as well as sitting immediately above Seventh Street Metro Center Station, the busiest subway station in Los Angeles by far. Figueroa Tower also benefits from ongoing improvements to Downtown Los Angeles, which is currently undergoing its largest construction boom since the 1920s. In the last decade alone, 42 developments of at least 50,000 square feet have been built and 37 projects are under construction. This renaissance of development has reignited the once-sleepy downtown area into a sprawling metropolis of urban residential lofts and diverse retail destinations. -
View Radiology Remodel, Clinton Kieth Master Plan, L.A
12 LOS ANGELES BUSINESS JOURNAL JANUARY 29, 2018 NEXT WEEK ARCHITECTURE FIRMS The Top Gifts received THE LIST Ranked by 2017 L.A. County Billings in L.A. County Rank Company L.A. County Current Projects Profile Top Local Executive • name Billings (partial list) • L.A. architects • name • address • 2017 • L.A. employees • title • website • 2016 • offices (L.A./total) • phone (in millions) • headquarters Gensler $90.3 LAX, Los Angeles Football Club Stadium, Westfield Century City, 141 John Adams 1 500 S. Figueroa St. $85.2 Herald Examiner, Caruso Palisades Village, Waldorf Astoria, 337 Barbara Bouza Los Angeles 90071 AltaSea at the Port of Los Angeles 1/44 Michael White gensler.com SanN/A Francisco Co-Managing Directors (213) 327-3600 ZGF Architects 44.8 Hilton Foundation headquarters Phase 2, Caltech Bechtel 42 Ted Hyman 2 515 S. Flower St., Suite 3700 39.2 residence, Hercules campus renovation, LA BioMed Research 100 Partner Los Angeles 90071 Building A, California ARB consolidation project 1/6 (213) 617-1901 zgf.com Portland,N/A Ore. Aecom 40.7 NBC Universal, UCI, LA2028 Olympic Committee, LAX, Metro, 60 Robert Lavey 3 300 S. Grand Ave. 34.8 L.A. County, U.S. Navy 185 Regional Managing Principal, Buildings Los Angeles 90071 4/595 and Places aecom.com Los Angeles (213) 593-8100 CallisonRTKL 37.0 Perla, 5th and Hill, 11th and Olive, Oceanwide Plaza, The Alexan, 161 Kelly Farrell 4 333 S. Hope St., Suite C200 39.0 888 Hope, Four Seasons, Los Angeles private residences, 3700 197 Vice President Los Angeles 90071 Wilshire, Figueroa Centre 1/20 (213) 633-6000 callisonrtkl.com Baltimore DLR Group 36.4 Macerich Fashion Outlets of Los Angeles, 41 Adrian O. -
Council Action
FRANK T. MARTINEZ CITY OF LOS ANGELES Office of the City Clerk CALIFORNIA CITY CLERK Council and Public Services KAREN E. KALFAYAN Room 395, City Hall Executive Officer Los Angeles, CA 90012 Council File Information- (213) 978-1044 General Information- (213) 978-1133 When making inquiries Fax: (213) 978-1040 relative to this matter refer to File No. CLAUDIA M. DUNN ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA Chief, Council and Public Services Division MAYOR 05-1761 CD 8 County of Los Angeles - Assessor 500 W. Temple Street, Room 290 February 8, 2006 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration Los Angeles, CA 90012 Councilmember Parks Board of Public Works Board of Water & Power Commissioners Board of Fire Commissioners Attn: Barbara Moschos Bureau of Engineering, Department of Transportation, Land Development Group Traffic Division Office of the Zoning Administrator Community Redevelopment Agency City Attorney Planning Department SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR FURTHER NOTIFICATIONS RE: VACATING VERMONT AVENUE AND 83RD STREET VACATION DISTRICT (VAC NO. E1400958) At the meeting of the Council held February 8, 2006, the following action was taken: Attached report adopted........................................ X Attached motion adopted() ...................................... ____________ Attached resolution adopted() ................................. ·------------ Motion adopted to approve attached report ...................... ____________ Motion adopted to approve attached communication .............. ·------------ FORTHWITH. X Findings adopted................................. -
Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards. -
The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles, California
THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 12 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2004 CH6990 TO: AGENCY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ROBERT R. OVROM, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER RESPONSIBLE PARTIES: CURT HOLGUIN, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY LILLIAN BURKENHEIM, PROJECT MANAGER SUBJECT: INCREASE OF WORK ORDER AMOUNT FOR THE LAW FIRM OF FOX & SOHAGI BY $ 25,000 (FROM $245,000 TO $ 270,000) FOR LITIGATION AND SETTLEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO DEVELOPER’S PERMITLESS DEMOLITION OF HISTORIC “GIESE RESIDENCE”, DEVELOPER’S SUBSEQUENT LAWSUIT AGAINST AGENCY AND CITY, AND SUBSEQUENT SETTLEMENT OF THAT LAWSUIT CHINATOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA CD1 RECOMMENDATION That the Agency, subject to City Council review and approval, authorize the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, to increase the work order amount for the law firm of Fox & Sohagi (“Fox & Sohagi “) in the amount of $25,000 (from $245,000 to $270,000) for additional legal services related to the litigation and settlement of Palmer Boston Street Properties II vs. City of Los Angeles and Community Redevelopment Agency (USDC Case No. CV03-6402-SVW), currently in the United States Federal District Court - Central District of California. SUMMARY The Illegal Demolition Of The Giese Residence In June 2002, Palmer Boston Street Properties II (“Palmer”) filed an application with the Agency for clearance of a permit to allow demolition of a 19th century residential building known as the “Giese Residence” located near the southeast corner of Figueroa Street and Cesar Chavez Avenue in the Chinatown Redevelopment Project Area (“Project Area”). A map of the Project Area showing the location of the Giese Residence is appended hereto as “Attachment A”. -
IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D.1 Cultural Resources—Historic Resources
IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D.1 Cultural Resources—Historic Resources 1. Introduction The following section of the Draft EIR evaluates potential impacts related to historic resources associated with development of the Proposed Project. The analysis is based on the following study and correspondence: Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza Historic Resource Report (the “Historic Resource Report”) prepared by Christopher A. Joseph and Associates, July 2009 (Appendix D1 to this Draft EIR) and written correspondence from the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, on April 16, 2009 (Appendix D2 to this Draft EIR). 2. Environmental Setting Generally, a lead agency must consider a property a historic resource under CEQA if it is eligible for listing in the National or California Register of Historical Resources (the “California Register”). The California Register is modeled after the National Register of Historic Places (the “National Register”). Furthermore, a property is presumed to be historically significant if it is listed in a local register of historic resources or has been identified as historically significant in a historic resources survey (provided certain criteria and requirements are satisfied) unless a preponderance of evidence demonstrates that the property is not historically or culturally significant.1 The National and California Register designation programs are discussed below. In addition, the Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Ordinance is discussed as a potentially applicable local designation program. a. Regulatory Framework (1) Federal Level (a) National Register of Historic Places The National Historic Preservation Act established the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) to recognize resources associated with the country’s history and heritage. -
Iii. Environmental Setting
III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This Section provides a brief overview of the Project Site’s regional and local setting. Additional descriptions of the environmental setting as it relates to each of the environmental issues analyzed in this EIR are included in the environmental setting discussions contained within Sections IV.A through IV.N of this EIR. A list of related projects, which is used as the basis for the discussion of cumulative impacts in each section is also provided. 1. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING a. Regional Setting b. Local Setting and Land Uses c. Surrounding Land Uses 2. RELATED PROJECTS Wilshire Grand Redevelopment Project III. Environmental Setting Draft Environmental Impact Report Page III-1 City of Los Angeles July 2010 1. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING a. Regional Setting The Project Site is located in Los Angeles County, in the Central City (downtown) area of the City of Los Angeles (the “City”) (see Section II [Project Description], Figure II-1 [Regional and Project Vicinity Map]). The Project Site is also located in the Financial Core district of downtown Los Angeles, which is bordered by South Park to the south and southwest, the Historic Core to the east and southeast, Bunker Hill to the north and northeast, and City West to the west and northwest across the US/Interstate 110 (the “Harbor Freeway”) (see Figure II-3 [Downtown Context Map] in Section II [Project Description]). Regional access to the Project Site is provided via the Harbor Freeway approximately 0.04 mile west of the Project Site. Wilshire Boulevard, Figueroa Street, and Olympic Boulevard serve as the primary arterial roadways providing access to the area surrounding the Project Site. -
RSU 22 Voters Approve 2017-18 Budget with Increased State Subsidy
August 2017 • Link-22 • RSU 22POSTAL - Hampden-Newburgh-Winterport-Frankfort PATRON ECRWSS • Page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE PAID HAMPDEN, ME PERMIT NO. 2 RSU 22 • Hampden • Newburgh • Winterport • Frankfort 24 Main Road North, Hampden, ME 04444 August 2017 HA recognized at National JCL convention RSU 22 voters approve The Junior Classical League 2017-18 budget with (JCL) of Hamp- den Academy increased state subsidy received sev- eral honors at in August 1 referendum the National RSU 22 voters have approved the 2017-18 budget at the dis- JCL convention, trict Budget Validation Referendum on Tuesday, August 1. which was held The vote was 397 for the budget and 328 against. July 24-29 at Voters in all four RSU 22 communities supported the budget. Troy University The vote tallies were: Hampden, 249-230; Newburgh, 47-24; Win- in Troy, AL. terport, 84-68; and Frankfort, 17-6. Five Hampden The second referendum was needed because voters rejected Academy students the original 2017-18 budget at the first referendum on June 13, attended the con- 710 to 637. vention, including Hampden Academy Junior Classical League representatives at the Na- The original budget was published and approved at the Dis- Andrew Terry, trict Budget Meeting before the Legislature had approved its fi- Molly Swalec, tional JCL Convention—Front row (l. to r.): Audrie French, Noah Burby, and Aidan Babbitt. Back row: Molly Swalec, faculty advisor Ben John- nal appropriations for school funding. The original RSU 22 bud- Audrie French, son, and Andrew Terry. get included only $18.1 million in state subsidy; the final RSU 22 Noah Burby, and subsidy figure was $18.7 million, an increase of $566,000.