DOCSLIB.ORG

Application for the FOREMAN & CLARK BUILDING

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Application for the FOREMAN & CLARK BUILDING Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC -200 8-4978 -HCM HEARING DATE: January 15, 2009 Location: 701 South Hill St. TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 9 PLACE : City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Central City 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: Central Los Angeles, CA Neighborhood Council: Downtown Los Angeles 90012 Legal Description: FR4 of Mueller Subdivision of the North ½ of Block 26 Ord’s Survey PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the FOREMAN & CLARK BUILDING REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER/ Kyung Ku Cho c/o Young Ju Kwon APPLICANT: 3200 Wilshire Blvd. #1100 Los Angeles, CA 90010 OWNER’S Robert Chattel REPRESENTATIVE: Chattel Architecture, Planning, and Preservation 13417 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA 94123 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10(c)4 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal may warrant further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings. S. GAIL GOLDBERG, AICP Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] ________________________ Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: November, 2008 Historic-Cultural Monument Application ZIMAS Report 701 S. Hill Street. CHC-2008-4978-HCM Page 2 of 2 SUMMARY Built in 1929 and located in the downtown area, this 13-story commercial building exhibits character-defining features of Art Deco-Gothic architecture. The subject building is rectangular in plan and located at the intersections of 7 th Street and Hill Street. The subject building has two primary facades clad in concrete and terra cotta arranged in the classic base-shaft-capital composition. The four lower levels are defined by large display windows with decorative detailing on the metal window surrounds. Above the third level, a denticulated cornice wraps the street facades. The fourth through eleventh floors feature a middle inset bay setback from the base, creating two tower wings facing Hill Street. Rows of 16 double-hung windows run along the main elevation on Hill Street with 10 double-hung steel windows along the 7 th Street elevation. Windows have bands of denticulation and decorative elements at their base. Above the fourth floor, the windows on the tower wings have projecting corbelled balconies. At the rooftop aligned with the inset bay, a mechanical penthouse rises an additional two stories with double height window openings, creating an open arcade. The rooftop of the tower wings exhibits decorative inset spandrel panels. Significant interior spaces include a main lobby space with marble and ornate brass elevators and hallways with marble flooring. The proposed Foreman & Clark Building historic monument was designed by the architectural firm of Curlett & Beelman Architects, consisting of Alexander Curlett (1880-1942) and Claud Beelman (1884-1963). This firm is responsible for the design of several Historic-Cultural Monuments (HCM) such as the Park Plaza Hotel (1924; HCM #267), Garfield Building (1925; HCM #121), and Barker Brothers Building (1925; HCM #356). The subject building was constructed as the flagship building for a Los Angeles-based chain of men’s clothiers department store, Foreman & Clark, established by businessmen Winfield Amos Foreman (1875-1932) and and A.J. Clark. These department stores were recognized for their distinctive second-story locations and upper floor display windows. The subject building appears significant as a well-preserved example of Art-Deco-Gothic style architecture and for its association with the commercial development of 7 th Street in the early part of the 20 th century. Later additions to the subject property include alteration of storefronts and some interior spaces. CRITERIA The criterion is the Cultural Heritage Ordinance which defines a historical or cultural monument as any site (including significant trees or other plant life located thereon) building or structure of particular historic or cultural significance to the City of Los Angeles, such as historic structures or sites in which the broad cultural, economic, or social history of the nation, State or community is reflected or exemplified, or which are identified with historic personages or with important events in the main currents of national, State or local history or which embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction, or a notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual genius influenced his age. FINDINGS Based on the facts set forth in the summary and application, the Commission determines that the application is complete and that the property is significant enough to warrant further investigation as a potential Historic-Cultural Monument. CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION Historic-Cultural Monument Application HISTORIC-CULTURAL MONUMENT APPLICATION CITY OF LOS ANGELES Significance Work Sheet TYPE OR HAND PRINT IN ALL CAPITAL BLOCK LETTERS Complete One or Both of the Upper and Lower Portions of This Page Architectural Significance THE IS AN IMPORTANT EXAMPLE OF NAME OF PROPOSED MONUMENT ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE (SEE LINE 8) AND MEETS THE CULTURAL HERITAGE ORDINANCE BECAUSE OF THE HIGH QUALITY OF ITS DESIGN AND THE RETENTION OF ITS ORIGINAL FORM, DETAILING AND INTEGRITY. and/or Historical Significance THE WAS BUILT IN NAME OF PROPOSED MONUMENT YEAR BUILT WAS IMPORTANT TO THE NAME OF FIRST OR SIGNIFICANT OTHER DEVELOPMENT OF LOS ANGELES BECAUSE HISTORIC-CULTURAL MONUMENT APPLICATION Historic-Cultural Monument Application TYPE OR HAND PRINT IN ALL CAPITAL BLOCK LETTERS Identification 1. NAME OF PROPOSED MONUMENT 2. STREET ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE COUNCIL DISTRICT 3. ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO. 4. COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TRACT BLOCK LOT(S) ARB. NO. 5. RANGE OF ADDRESSES ON PROPERTY 6. PRESENT OWNER STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PHONE ( ) OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE PUBLIC 7. PRESENT USE ORIGINAL USE Description 8. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE (SEE STYLE GUIDE) 9. STATE PRESENT PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE OR STRUCTURE (SEE OPTIONAL DECRIPTION WORK SHEET. 1 PAGE MAXIMUM) HISTORIC-CULTURAL MONUMENT APPLICATION Historic-Cultural Monument Application Name of Proposed Monument 10. CONSTRUCTION DATE: 11. ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, OR ENGINEER 12. CONTRACTOR OR OTHER BUILDER 13. DATES OF ENCLOSED PHOTOGRAPHS (1 8X10 BLACK AND WHITE GLOSSY AND 1 DIGITAL E-MAILED TO CULTURAL HERITAGE [email protected]) 14. CONDITION: I EXCELLENT I GOOD I FAIR I DETERIORATED I NO LONGER IN EXISTENCE 15. ALTERATIONS 16. THREATS TO SITE: I NONE KNOWN I PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT I VANDALISM I PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT I ZONING I OTHER 17. IS THE STRUCTURE: I ON ITS ORIGINAL SITE I MOVED I UNKNOWN SIGNIFICANCE 18. BRIEFLY STATE HISTORICAL AND/OR ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE: INCLUDE DATES, EVENTS, AND PERSON ASSOCIATED WITH THE SITE (SEE ALSO SIGNIFICANCE WORK SHEET. 750 WORDS MAXIMUM IF USING ADDITIONAL SHEETS) 19. SOURCES (LIST BOOKS, DOCUMENTS, SURVEYS, PERSONAL INTERVIEWS WITH DATES) 20. DATE FORM PREPARED PREPARER’S NAME ORGANIZATION STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PHONE ( ) HISTORIC-CULTURAL MONUMENT APPLICATION Historic-Cultural Monument Application Foreman & Clark building, 701 South Hill Street Description The Foreman & Clark building is a 13-story reinforced concrete frame commercial building with overpainted limestone cladding located at the southwest corner of West 7th and South Hill Street in downtown Los Angeles, in a dense, urban setting (Attachment A, figures 1-3 and photographs 1-31; Attachment B, 1983 survey form for the Foreman & Clark building).1 The building is configured as a simple rectangle in plan, but its massing is articulated in two distinct parts. The building rises from the 1st floor to the 4th floor to form a square plinth, but on floors above breaks at the center with a large void that creates a U-shaped mass facing Hill Street which is the principal façade. Decorative horizontal banding also occurs at several floors and works to visually break up building massing. While the overall design of the building is Art Deco in style and form, some decorative elements are drawn from English Gothic precedents as a theme.2 The façade is arranged in a classical division of base, shaft and capital. The base of the building is composed of the first four floors and is three bays wide facing Hill Street. The first three floors of the base have large display windows with decorative detailing on the metal window surrounds. These window enframements feature dimensional relief with various plant motifs and corbels in the shape of figurative heads. A small amount of terrazzo sidewalk is located near the center of the Hill Street façade at the old entrance to the Foreman & Clark men‟s clothing store. Above the third floor, a denticulated cornice wraps the street façades and marks a transition in the window surrounds from the lower three floors of the base to the 4th floor. The 4th floor acts as a transition floor in the composition of the façade. While including the three bay rhythm of the lower three floors, the 4th floor incorporates the new rhythm of bays for the upper portion of the building. Above the 4th floor, a horizontal band composed of three projecting corbelled balcony elements within a frieze demarcates the termination of the base of the building before it rises as a tower. The upper floor façade on Hill Street is 16 bays wide, while the 7th Street façade is 10 bays wide. Each of the two tower wings is five bays wide rising above the 4th floor below. The inset portion of the building above the 4th floor is setback six bays from the façade and is six bays wide. At the rooftop, aligned with the upper floor Hill Street setback, a mechanical penthouse rises an additional two stories with a double height, open arcade facing east.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jational Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    •m No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE JATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS >_____ NAME HISTORIC BROADWAY THEATER AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT________________________ AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER <f' 300-8^9 ^tttff Broadway —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Los Angeles VICINITY OF 25 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Los Angeles 037 | CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED .^COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE .XBOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ^ENTERTAINMENT _ REUGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS 2L.YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: NAME Multiple Ownership (see list) STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF | LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDSETC. Los Angeie s County Hall of Records STREET & NUMBER 320 West Temple Street CITY. TOWN STATE Los Angeles California ! REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TiTLE California Historic Resources Inventory DATE July 1977 —FEDERAL ^JSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS office of Historic Preservation CITY, TOWN STATE . ,. Los Angeles California DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE X.GOOD 0 —RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE- —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Broadway Theater and Commercial District is a six-block complex of predominately commercial and entertainment structures done in a variety of architectural styles. The district extends along both sides of Broadway from Third to Ninth Streets and exhibits a number of structures in varying condition and degree of alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40Th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42Nd Street), Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 23, 1980, Designation List 137 LP-1127 PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42nd Street), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1917-19; architects Warren & Wetmore. Landmark Site: The property bounded by a line running easward parallel with the northern curb line of East 40th Street, a line running northward to the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, parallel with the eastern wall of the viaduct, a line running westward along the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, and a line running southward parallel with the western wall of the viaduct to the point of beginning. On March 11, 1980, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Pershing Square Viaduct (Park Avenue Viaduct) and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 9). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Located at Park Avenue and 42nd Street, tfie Pershing Square Viaduct was constructed tn 1917-1919. The viaduct extends from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal at 42nd Street, linking upper and lower Park Avenue by way of elevated drives that make a circuit around the terminal building and descend to ground level at 45th Street. Designed in 1912 by the architectural firm of Warren & Wetmore, the viaduct was conceived as part of the original 1903 plan for the station by the firm of Reed & Stem.
    [Show full text]
  • 2500 W 7Th Street
    COMMERCIAL 2500 W 7th Street 2500 W 7TH STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90057 PROPERTY AT A GLANCE Building Size Lot Size 20,000 SQ. FT. 13,939 SQ. FT. Floors Year Built 2 1924 Walk Score Transit Score 95 82 FEATURED AMENITIES Commune-designed details Polished concrete and wood Fully approved Type-47 CUB with seating for flooring throughout throughout 167 including an exclusive outdoor patio _____ _____ _____ 9- to 15-foot ceiling heights. On-street parking and at surrounding public Custom wood windows and door _____ lots _____ ____ 2500 W 7th Street HISTORIC BUILDING CONVERTED TO CREATIVE OFFICE SPACE Completed in 1924 in the Spanish Colonial Revival style The building has been completely renovated while by architect Everett H. Merrill, 2500 W 7th St is one of maintaining its historic character and detailing. Restored Macarthur Park's most architecturally stunning buildings. A architectural features include the Churrigueresque detailing recently completed restoration and building modernization around the windows and main entrance way. underscores the building's historic character. Anchor tenants at 2500 W 7th St include Macarthur Park mainstays Aardvark Letterpress—celebrating their 50th anniversary in 2020; and paper supply shop McManus & Morgan (established 1923). LOCATION HIGHLIGHTS Westlake / Macarthur Park’s story goes back to the late 1800s. The neighborhood’s park was built around a reservoir that was connected to the LA River. By the 1920s, West 7th St had developed into one of LA's first high-end shopping districts. Today, Macarthur Park’s diverse immigrant culture is thriving alongside new development as well as a newfound interest in revitalizing the neighborhood's landmark buildings including the Hayworth Theatre and the Macarthur / Park Plaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Government and Public Affairs
    Director of Government and Public Affairs Recruitment services provided by Ralph Andersen & Associates An Outstanding Opportunity Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is conducting an extensive search for a proven Director of Government and Public Affairs. As a member of the Executive Leadership Team, the Director will develop and implement a plan for SCAG’s government relations, communications strategy, and community engagement that builds upon outreach efforts and activities to engage local, state, and federal stakeholders in the region. The Director of Government and Public Affairs serves as a critical advisor working proactively and collaboratively to lead the implementation of SCAG’s strategic engagement initiative and adopted legislative priorities at the state and federal level. Experience dealing with transportation and mobility issues is desired, along with other areas such as housing, climate action plans, sustainability, and quality of life issues. At a high level, the Director should have experience quickly analyzing complex political and legislative situations, assessing opportunities, and a proven ability to pivot when change is necessary, while simultaneously cultivating and building trusted relationships with policymakers and their staff across the region. This role will need to deliver a compelling and timely message across a variety of platforms on key issues to all SCAG partners. At SCAG, we strive to foster a culture of recognition and value leaders who recognize and develop potential within their team and bring out the best in others. This role will oversee 20 talented and dedicated professionals across three departments with functional areas in internal and external communications, legislative affairs, government affairs, local membership needs, and stakeholder engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • DLANC Planning 601 W 7Th St.Pdf
    ATTACHMENT “A” REQUEST FOR DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL L.A.M.C. §12.24 M Chipotle Mexican Grill Store #1500 601 W. 7th St. Los Angeles Chipotle Mexican Grill (Chipotle Mexican Grill, LLC, d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill, (“the Applicant” and/or “Chipotle”) is seeking the following discretionary approval: Pursuant to L.A.M.C. Section 12.24 M, the Applicant requests a Plan Approval for the continued sale and/or dispensing of alcohol for on-site consumption in connection with an existing 104-seat, 3,042 s.f. restaurant with hours of operation from 10:30 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily, located on a 10,463 s.f. lot in the C2-4D zone. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant, Chipotle, is requesting a Plan Approval to permit the continued service of a full line of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption at its existing location at 601 W. 7th St. in Downtown Los Angeles (“Site”). Chipotle opened in March 2011, and has served beer since its opening date pursuant to Case No. ZA 2010- 2296 (CUB) ("Existing Approval"), which approved the restaurant to serve a full line of alcoholic beverages. The restaurant is 3,042 s.f. and provides 104 indoor seats. The Applicant currently holds a type 41 ABC license (beer and wine), but would continue to like the operational flexibility to upgrade the license in order to add margaritas to its offerings at a future date. The request herein is only a renewal and is purely operational in nature. The Applicant believes that its request for a Plan Approval for the continued service of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption along with meals at its “fast casual” Mexican-style restaurant is warranted based upon the company’s outstanding record of compliance with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverages (“ABC”), the appropriateness of the location for the requested use, and its overall reputation as a well-established, responsible company which can be trusted to manage the requested ABC license appropriately.
    [Show full text]
  • California Highway Patrol Organizational Roster
    California Highway Patrol Organizational Roster March 2018 Notify the following for changes/updates: • Human Resources Section at (916) 843-3700 (for commander information) • Telecommunications Section via [email protected] (for telephone or fax numbers) • Facilities Section at (916) 843-3800 (for address information) • Business Services Section at (916) 843-3600 (for all other requests) Further information can be found in GO 21.7. 601 North 7th Street California Highway Patrol P.O. Box 942898 Sacramento, California 95811-0208 Sacramento, California 94298-0001 Organizational Roster (916) 843-3000 LOCATION COMMANDER PUBLIC FAX 001 COMMISSIONER W. A. Stanley 916-843-3001 Deputy Commissioner S. Silsbee 916-843-3001 Administrative Assistant Lt. M. C. Alvarez 916-843-3001 916-843-3264 007 Office of Employee Relations Asst. Chief R. J. Okashima 916-843-3100 916-843-3109 010 Office of Inspector General Insp. Gen. R. Y. Ikemoto 916-843-3160 916-843-3293 Captain I. Y. Tien 916-843-3160 916-843-3293 Audits and Evaluations Unit 916-843-3160 916-843-3293 Office of Inspector General - South 951-486-2829 951-486-2955 Clark Training Center 16791 Davis Avenue Riverside, CA 92518-1509 012 Office of Special Representative Asst. Chief R. F. Desmond, Jr. 916-843-3200 916-843-3292 013 Office of Community Outreach and Media Captain S. N. Miller 916-843-3310 916-843-3337 Relations 030 Office of Accreditation Lt. S. R. Lunardi 916-843-4350 916-843-3264 031 Office of Internal Affairs Captain R. Romo 916-843-3060 916-843-3098 Workers' Compensation Fraud Investigations 916-843-3060 916-843-3099 Unit Toll-Free Fraud Reporting Hotline 866-779-9237 032 Office of Legal Affairs Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Would You Believe L.A.? (Revisited)
    WOULD YOU BELIEVE L.A.? (REVISITED) Downtown Walking Tours 35th Anniversary sponsored by: Major funding for the Los Angeles Conservancy’s programs is provided by the LaFetra Foundation and the Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation. Media Partners: Photos by Annie Laskey/L. A. Conservancy except as noted: Bradbury Building by Anthony Rubano, Orpheum Theatre and El Dorado Lofts by Adrian Scott Fine/L.A. Conservancy, Ace Hotel Downtown Los Angeles by Spencer Lowell, 433 Spring and Spring Arcade Building by Larry Underhill, Exchange Los Angeles from L.A. Conservancy archives. 523 West Sixth Street, Suite 826 © 2015 Los Angeles Conservancy Los Angeles, CA 90014 Based on Would You Believe L.A.? written by Paul Gleye, with assistance from John Miller, 213.623.2489 . laconservancy.org Roger Hatheway, Margaret Bach, and Lois Grillo, 1978. ince 1980, the Los Angeles Conservancy’s walking tours have introduced over 175,000 Angelenos and visitors alike to the rich history and culture of Sdowntown’s architecture. In celebration of the thirty-fifth anniversary of our walking tours, the Los Angeles Conservancy is revisiting our first-ever offering: a self-guided tour from 1978 called Would You Believe L.A.? The tour map included fifty-nine different sites in the historic core of downtown, providing the basis for the Conservancy’s first three docent-led tours. These three tours still take place regularly: Pershing Square Landmarks (now Historic Downtown), Broadway Historic Theatre District (now Broadway Theatre and Commercial District), and Palaces of Finance (now Downtown Renaissance). In the years since Would You Believe L.A.? was created and the first walking tours began, downtown Los Angeles has undergone many changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards.
    [Show full text]
  • RE1CEIVED 2280 NFS Form 10-900 3MB No
    RE1CEIVED 2280 NFS Form 10-900 3MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) (Expires 1-31-2009) United States Department of the Interior MAY 0 1 2009 National Park Service ML reQISJEBOF HISTORIC PLACES National Register of Historic Places Registrat ON ^SCKW. PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual propertie ana districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items._____________________________________________________________________ 1. Name of Property Historic name Brockman Building and New York Cloak & Suit House (Annex) Other names/site number 2. Location Street & Number 520 W. 7th Street and 708 S. Grand Ave. Not for Publication N/A City or Town Los Angeles Vicinity N/A State California Code CA County Los Angeles Code 037 Zip Code 90014 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D.1 Cultural Resources—Historic Resources
    IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D.1 Cultural Resources—Historic Resources 1. Introduction The following section of the Draft EIR evaluates potential impacts related to historic resources associated with development of the Proposed Project. The analysis is based on the following study and correspondence: Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza Historic Resource Report (the “Historic Resource Report”) prepared by Christopher A. Joseph and Associates, July 2009 (Appendix D1 to this Draft EIR) and written correspondence from the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, on April 16, 2009 (Appendix D2 to this Draft EIR). 2. Environmental Setting Generally, a lead agency must consider a property a historic resource under CEQA if it is eligible for listing in the National or California Register of Historical Resources (the “California Register”). The California Register is modeled after the National Register of Historic Places (the “National Register”). Furthermore, a property is presumed to be historically significant if it is listed in a local register of historic resources or has been identified as historically significant in a historic resources survey (provided certain criteria and requirements are satisfied) unless a preponderance of evidence demonstrates that the property is not historically or culturally significant.1 The National and California Register designation programs are discussed below. In addition, the Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Ordinance is discussed as a potentially applicable local designation program. a. Regulatory Framework (1) Federal Level (a) National Register of Historic Places The National Historic Preservation Act established the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) to recognize resources associated with the country’s history and heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • RSU 22 Voters Approve 2017-18 Budget with Increased State Subsidy
    August 2017 • Link-22 • RSU 22POSTAL - Hampden-Newburgh-Winterport-Frankfort PATRON ECRWSS • Page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE PAID HAMPDEN, ME PERMIT NO. 2 RSU 22 • Hampden • Newburgh • Winterport • Frankfort 24 Main Road North, Hampden, ME 04444 August 2017 HA recognized at National JCL convention RSU 22 voters approve The Junior Classical League 2017-18 budget with (JCL) of Hamp- den Academy increased state subsidy received sev- eral honors at in August 1 referendum the National RSU 22 voters have approved the 2017-18 budget at the dis- JCL convention, trict Budget Validation Referendum on Tuesday, August 1. which was held The vote was 397 for the budget and 328 against. July 24-29 at Voters in all four RSU 22 communities supported the budget. Troy University The vote tallies were: Hampden, 249-230; Newburgh, 47-24; Win- in Troy, AL. terport, 84-68; and Frankfort, 17-6. Five Hampden The second referendum was needed because voters rejected Academy students the original 2017-18 budget at the first referendum on June 13, attended the con- 710 to 637. vention, including Hampden Academy Junior Classical League representatives at the Na- The original budget was published and approved at the Dis- Andrew Terry, trict Budget Meeting before the Legislature had approved its fi- Molly Swalec, tional JCL Convention—Front row (l. to r.): Audrie French, Noah Burby, and Aidan Babbitt. Back row: Molly Swalec, faculty advisor Ben John- nal appropriations for school funding. The original RSU 22 bud- Audrie French, son, and Andrew Terry. get included only $18.1 million in state subsidy; the final RSU 22 Noah Burby, and subsidy figure was $18.7 million, an increase of $566,000.
    [Show full text]