DOCSLIB.ORG

FY2017-2021 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Report Number 1-2017 Adopted by the COMPASS Board of Directors October 17, 2016 Resolution No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY2017-2021 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Report Number 1-2017 Adopted by the COMPASS Board of Directors October 17, 2016 Resolution No FY2017-2021 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Report Number 1-2017 Adopted by the COMPASS Board of Directors October 17, 2016 Resolution No. 01-2017 Amended: December 13, 2016, February 27, 2017, April 17, 2017, June 19, 2017, August 28, 2017, and September 12, 2017. Modified: October 19, 2016, November 7, 2016, December 13, 2016, January 13, 2017, January 20, 2017, February 6, 2017, February 10, 2017, March 8, 2017, March 21, 2017, April 13, 2017, May 9, 2017, May 24, 2017, July 10, 2017, July 26, 2017, September 1, 2017, October 24, 2017, November 9, 2017, and December 7, 2017. The completion of this document was financed by U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) funds through the Idaho Transportation Department and contributions from member agencies within Ada and Canyon Counties. T:\FY18\600 Projects\685 TIP\FY1721TIP\Reports\FY2017TIPrpt.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 II. FORMATTING .............................................................................................. 4 III. PUBLIC OUTREACH EFFORTS ....................................................................... 4 III. TIP ACHIEVEMENT ....................................................................................... 8 IV. AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ............................................................................ 12 V. LOCAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES ......................................................................... 12 VI. FUNDING CATEGORIES .............................................................................13 VII. FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT ........................................................................... 18 VIII. PROGRAM FUNDING ALLOCATIONS ............................................................ 29 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: TIP Achievement Categories................................................................. 9 Table 2: Criteria for TIP Achievement Categories................................................. 10 Table 3: Analysis of TIP Achievement .................................................................... 11 Table 4: Available Funding* with Match vs. Programmed Projects (AvP) DRAFT FY2017-2021 Idaho Transportation Investment Program ................................ 23 Table 5: Ada Co unty Highway District Budget Histo ry, 2008 - 2015..................... 24 Table 6: Ada County Highway District Budget Program, FY2016 - FY2021 Projected Revenues and Expenditures for Capital Projects............................... 25 Table 7: Nampa Urbaniz ed Area Cities and Highway Districts Budget Histo ry, 2008-2015 ................................................................................................... 25 Table 8: Nampa Urbanized Area Cities and Highway Districts Budget Projections, 2015-2020 ................................................................................. 26 Table 9: Other Canyon County Cities and Highway Districts Budget History, 2008-2015 ................................................................................................... 26 Table 10: Other Canyon County Cities and Highway Districts Budget Projections, 2016-2020 ................................................................................................... 26 Table 11: Valley Regio nal Transit Budget Histo ry, 2008-2015 ............................. 27 Table 12: Valley Regio nal Transit Budget Pro jectio ns, 2016-2020 ....................... 27 Table 13. COMPASS Regio n Available vs. Pro grammed Funding ........................... 28 Table 14: Share of Project Costs Allocated to Alternative Modes of Transportation .............................................................................................. 29 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: COMPASS Planning Area ..........................................................................2 Figure 2: Northern Ada County Air Quality Maintenance Area ..................................... 3 Figure 3: Idaho Transportation Department FY2017 Appropriations (Senate Bill 1423) .............................................................................................................21 Figure 4: Idaho Transportation Department Highway User Revenue - FY2017 ............21 APPENDICES A. List of Projects .............................................................................................. 30 B. Public Comments ........................................................................................... 148 I. INTRODUCTION The Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a short-range (3-5 year) capital improvement program (budget) of transportation projects consistent with federal regulations and area policies and strategies. The Idaho Transportation Investment Program (ITIP) is the state’s short-range capital improvement program. The ITIP references projects in Ada County and Canyon County via the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS) TIP. The TIP is developed through a cooperative process by COMPASS, the designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the Nampa Urbanized Area and the Boise Urbanized Area Transportation Management Area (TMA). This process involves extensive participation by the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD); Ada County Highway District (ACHD); Canyon Highway District; Ada and Canyon Counties; the cities of Boise, Caldwell, Eagle, Garden City, Kuna, Meridian, Middleton, Nampa, Parma, Star, and W ilder; Capital City Development Corporation; and Valley Regional Transit (VRT), the regional public transportation authority. The TIP must be consistent with the regional long-range transportation plan, Communities in Motion 2040 (CIM 2040). The COMPASS Board of Directors adopted CIM 2040 on July 21, 2014. The plan is comprised of long-range transportation corridors, a short-range public transportation component, air quality conformity, pathway development, and transportation system management elements. CIM 2040 is consistent with the goals and objectives of the area’s comprehensive plans. The first four years of the TIP are of particular interest since the years are considered as "budgeted," while the remaining years are more informational in nature. The latter projects are listed to provide a framework for transportation needs that move from the planning stage to the implementation stage. Per federal regulations, information on the status of projects in the first year of the previous TIP will be posted online by December 2016 at www.compassidaho.org/prodserv/transimprovement.htm under “Annual Listing of Projects.” This document includes all federally funded projects and those non-federally funded projects deemed “regionally significant” for air quality conformity purposes in Ada County (see page 18 for the definition of “regionally significant”). The TIP projects identified in this document are within the estimates of available funds from a variety of sources, both federal and non-federal. The Boise TMA includes the cities of Boise, Eagle, Meridian, and Garden City; and the Nampa Urbanized Area includes the cities of Nampa, Caldwell, and Middleton, as well as adjacent densely settled areas as shown in Figure 1. The smoothed urbanized area boundaries for the Boise and Nampa areas were adopted by the COMPASS Board of Directors, via Resolution 15-2013, on August 19, 2013. The planning area includes all of Ada and Canyon Counties. The Ada County air quality “maintenance area” encompasses the entire area of Ada County north of the Boise Baseline (Figure 2), located seven miles south of the City of Kuna. Northern Ada County is a maintenance area for two air pollutants – coarse particulate matter (airborne dust and other particles; referred to as “PM10”) and carbon monoxide. Northern Ada County violated the federal standard for these pollutants in the 1980s and early 1990s, and has been in compliance ever since. Plans are in place to ensure the area maintains its compliance with these standards. The urban clusters of the cities of Kuna and Star are inside the planning area and the maintenance area. 1 Figure 1: COMPASS Planning Area 2 Figure 2: Northern Ada County Air Quality Maintenance Area 3 II. FORMATTING The Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) and ITD met early in 2010 with the intent of finding ways to more efficiently manage the ITIP process. a. FHWA requires all reporting documents be shown in the year of expenditure. This means project costs must be shown with inflationary factors expected for the year funds will be expended. b. Agencies in the State of Idaho currently use a 2% inflation factor to adjust the cost of future expenditures for most projects. III. PUBLIC OUTREACH EFFORTS The public outreach process for the annual TIP begins approximately 16 months prior to its final approval. This effort includes requesting input from the local governments in the Boise and Nampa Urbanized Areas, local governments outside the urbanized areas within Ada and Canyon Counties, and the general public. Public outreach efforts were guided by, and comply with, requirements and recommendations outlined in the COMPASS Public Involvement Plan (Section II of the COMPASS Integrated Communication Plan, www.compassidaho.org/people/publicinvolvement.htm). Chapter 5 of the Integrated Communication Plan specifically outlines the public involvement process for the TIP. Local Governments’ Input. Some local governments in Ada County have a designated transportation task force committee to provide input into the development of the annual TIP
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pooler Vision
    DRAFT 07.30.21 City of Pooler Comprehensive Plan Adoption Dates Adopted by October 31st, 2021 Adopted by October 31st, 2021 DRAFT ADVANCING TOGETHER. REDEFINING TOMORROW. DRAFT DRAFT IV POOLER 2040 (Page Intentionally Left Blank) DRAFT POOLER 2040 V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I ntroduction Pooler 2040 is the culmination of collaboration over this City of Pooler's Mayor & Council Members past year and would not have been possible without the time, knowledge and energy of those persons listed and to Rebecca Benton—Mayor the hundreds of community members who came to events, participated in virtual public meetings, attended steering Shannon Black—Council Member committees, answered our survey and provided their Aaron Higgins—Council Member invaluable input. Tom Hutcherson—Council Member The Chatham County—Savannah Metropolitan Planning Stevie Wall—Council Member Commission (MPC) would like to thank the city of Pooler John Wilcher—Council Member City Council for engaging our organization in this important Karen Williams—Council Member project. The continued support and participation of these community leaders is vital. Our sincere appreciation is Pooler Staff expressed to these individuals. The MPC was pleased to have the opportunity to assist and support the community in Robert Byrd, Jr.—City Manager developing the city of Pooler’s Comprehensive Plan update. Matt Saxon—Assistant City Manager Phillip Claxton—Planning Director Kimberly Classen—Zoning Administrator Steven E. Scheer—City Attorney DRAFT VI POOLER 2040 Technical Assistance Stakeholder Committee Chatham—Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission Staff Rebecca Benton—Mayor Shannon Black—Council Member Melanie Wilson—Executive Director MPC Aaron Higgins—Council Member Pamela Everett—Assistant Executive Director Tom Hutcherson—Council Member Jackie Jackson—Director of Advance Planning Stevie Wall—Council Member Lara Hall—Director of SAGIS John Wilcher—Council Member Marcus Lotson—Director of Development Services Karen Williams—Council Member Leah G.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Potential Freeway Segments for Dedicated Truck Lanes
    Identifying Potential Freeway Segments for Dedicated Truck Lanes Submitted By: Christopher J. Espiritu A Thesis Quality Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Masters of Science in Transportation Management Mineta Transportation Institute San Jose State University June 2013 Acknowledgements My greatest appreciation goes to Dr. Peter Haas and Rod Diridon for guiding me through this process. A special thank you goes to Dr. Nick Compin and Dr. Amelia Regan for their guidance and support of this project. My appreciation also goes to the representatives of the Caltrans Traffic Data Branch, Georgia DOT, Virginia DOT, Washington DOT, Oregon DOT, and NJ DOT; this project would not be possible without your great work. A special thank you also goes to Viviann Ferea for all the help and support over the last couple of years. This is dedicated to my loving family. To my sister (Charity) and my brother‐in‐law (Dave), for their unfailing support and encouragement. To my beloved Susan, for her support and patience. And finally, this is dedicated to my mother (Deborah), who I have dearly missed over the last year and a half since starting this program. Page 2 Table of Contents BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 8 RESEARCH FOCUS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser-Known Areas the National Parks: Lesser-Known Areas
    The National Parks: Lesser-Known Areas The National Parks: Lesser-Known Areas Produced by the Office of Public Affairs and the Division of Publications National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 1985 National Park Service U. S. Department of the Interior As the nation's principal ment of life through outdoor conservation agency, the recreation. The Department Department of the Interior assesses our energy and has responsibility for most of mineral resources and works our nationally owned public to assure that their develop­ lands and natural resources. ment is in the best interest of This includes fostering the all our people. The Depart­ wisest use of our land and ment also has a major respon- water resources, protecting siblity for American Indian our fish and wildlife, preserv­ reservation communities and ing the environmental and for people who live in island cultural values of our national territories under United parks and historical places, States administration. and providing for the enjoy­ For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 Contents Introduction 4 Maps of the National Park System 6 National Park Service Regional Offices 9 Lesser-Known Areas Listed by State 10 Index 48 Lesser-Known Parks: Doorways to Adventure Few travelers are familiar with most parks described here. Many are located away from principal highways or are relatively new to the National Park Sys­ tem. And most, but not all, are smaller than the more popular parks. Yet these sites contain nationally significant sce­ nic and cultural resources, many of com­ parable quality to the more famous parks.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPER SITES Citronelle County Rd
    State Nearest City or Cnty Site Name Acreage Notes Contact Alabama Athens Limestone Co. I-65/Hwy 31 2,010 possible dual rail; no zoning required; 2 private owners; Tom Hill, 256-232-2386 or fronts I-65 in Huntsville MSA; ag zoning; dual rail; www.edpa.org all utilities & fi beroptic on site; $45,000/acre negotiable Bay Minette Catawba Megasite 1,048 Daphne-Fairhope micropolitan area near Mobile; www.edpa.org zoned light industrial; CSX rail on site; gas and sewer 3.5 mi. away; 17 mi. to I-10, 3 mi. to I-65; $10,000/acre negotiable Copper Station Airport site 1,981 forested; $25,000/acre negotiable www.edpa.org Boligee Crossroads of America site 1,240 No zoning; 1 mi. from I-59/I-20 interchange; located in a www.edpa.org state Favored Geographic Area and within a Renewal Community; $10,000/acre negotiable; A&G Railroad Co. spur Calera Shelby Co. Megasite 1,539 Birmingham-Hoover MSA; ag zoning; $8,000/acre; www.edpa.org 1 mi. to I-65 Childersburg Childersburg Industrial Park 2,001 large water capability; two Ala. Power substations on site; L. Calvin Miller, 256-245-8332 dual rail, but spur removed; sewer installed in portion of park; new access road coming in 2009; under public ownership; within an Enterprise Zone SUPER SITES Citronelle County Rd. 41/I-65 1,900 forested; 14 mi. to I-65; Mobile MSA; $6,500/acre neg. www.edpa.org Creola Creola Mobile River @I-65 1,800 Mobile MSA; forested site; 1 mi.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Automatic Sign Inventory and Pavement Condition Evaluation On
    GEORGIA DOT RESEARCH PROJECT 15-11 FINAL REPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF AUTOMATIC SIGN INVENTORY AND PAVEMENT CONDITION EVALUATION ON GEORGIA’S INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS OFFICE OF RESEARCH 15 KENNDY DRIVE FOREST PARK, GA 30297-2534 Contract Research GDOT Research Project No. 15-11 Final Report IMPLEMENTATION OF AUTOMATIC SIGN INVENTORY AND PAVEMENT CONDITION EVALUATION ON GEORGIA’S INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS By Yichang (James) Tsai, Ph.D., P.E. Zhaohua Wang, Ph.D., P.E. Chengbo Ai, Ph.D. Georgia Institute of Technology Contract with Georgia Department of Transportation In cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration February 2017 The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who is (are) responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Georgia Department of Transportation or of the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. 1.Report No.: 2. Government Accession 3. Recipient's Catalog No.: FHWA-GA-16-15-11 No.: 4. Title and Subtitle: 5. Report Date: February 2017 Implementation of Automatic Sign Inventory and Pavement Condition Evaluation on Georgia’s Interstate Highways 6. Performing Organization Code: 7. Author(s): Yichang (James) Tsai; Zhaohua Wang; 8. Performing Organ. Report No.: 15-11 Chengbo Ai 9. Performing Organization Name and Address: 10. Work Unit No.: Georgia Institute of Technology 790 Atlantic Drive Atlanta, GA 30332-0355 11. Contract or Grant No.: 0013245 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address: 13. Type of Report and Period Covered: Georgia Department of Transportation Final; June 2, 2015 - September 2, 2016 Office of Research 15 Kennedy Drive 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating a Century of Simply the Best in Service, Safety and Innovation 1960S Introduction
    CELEBRATING A CENTURY OF SIMPLY THE BEST IN SERVICE, SAFETY AND INNOVATION 1960s INTRODUCTION marks the year On the state level, we are indeed grateful for the turning point in of Georgia DOT’s transportation that came in 2015 with the passage by state lawmakers 2016centennial! of the Transportation Funding Act (TFA). This historic legislation On August 16, 1916, the provides a sustainable transportation revenue source to address Georgia Highway Commission— Georgia’s transportation needs, and to restore and maintain the state’s 1900s now Georgia Department of critical transportation infrastructure. Transportation—was created. While we celebrate 100 years of Simply the Best in Safety, Service And for the last 100 years, and Innovation, we reflect on our past accomplishments, but our Georgia DOT has played a key work is not done. There are challenges to come in the next 100 years role in the growth and transformation of the state with transportation and beyond. The automobile of the future will have a tremendous infrastructure improvements that increase economic growth through impact on transportation, and finding new and innovative ways to expanded markets and increased job opportunities. address freight and mobility concerns will always be a primary goal 1920s In every decade of Georgia DOT’s 100-year history, road building for us. Our strategic goals of planning and constructing the best set has improved mobility, enhanced quality of life, presented significant of mobility-focused projects on schedule; making safety investments business opportunities beyond the paving of a road, and encouraged and improvements where the traveling public is most at risk; making innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Hurricane Guide
    BRIAN KEMP HOMER BRYSON GOVERNOR DIRECTOR BRIAN KEMP HOMER BRYSON GOVERNOR DIRECTOR Jan.Jan. 1717,, 20182019 Dear Fellow Citizens, Time is essential when planning and preparing for any hurricane event, as they can cause catastrophic damage. Tropical systems can produce storm surges, flooding, tornadoes and destructive winds for both coastal and inland areas in Georgia, and I encourage all residents take the initiative to prevent loss of life and property, and improve community awareness before a storm occurs. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District, and the National Weather Service, in partnership with the Georgia Emergency Management and Homeland Security Agency, bring our citizens the Official Georgia Hurricane Guide to improve community awareness before a storm occurs. This detailed guide covers tips on preparedness and what to do during and after a tropical event, as well as provides key facts about hurricanes. Developing a disaster plan, reviewing emergency preparations, creating emergency checklists, building a Ready kit and staying current with weather situations can make a tremendous difference when a hurricane is approaching. GEMA/HS and our partners are dedicated to serving the community and keeping residents safe when hurricanes and other severe weather-related events occur. We ask that you assist us in these efforts and encourage you to read this guide so you and your loved ones will be better prepared for this upcoming hurricane season. Visit Weather-Ready Nation at www.weather.gov/contact/weatherreadynation to find your local National Weather Service office and learn about building a strong community before disaster strikes. I also encourage you to visit the GEMA/HS website at www.gema.ga.gov for additional information on hurricane preparation methods.
    [Show full text]
  • A Traveler's Guide to the Heritage Landmarks of the United Methodist Church
    A Traveler's Guide to the Heritage Landmarks of The United Methodist Church General Commission on Archives and History P.O. Box 127, Madison, NJ 07940 2012 By action of the 2012 General Conference, there are currently forty-six Heritage Landmarks of The United Methodist Church. Five new Heritage Landmarks were designated by the General Conference with three outside the United States. These are in the Philippines, Zimbabwe, and Liberia. The Book of Discipline defines a Heritage Landmark as “a building, location, or structure specifically related to significant events, developments, or personalities in the overall history of The United Methodist Church or its antecedents.” The Heritage Landmarks of United Methodism remind us of those people and events that have shaped our history. They are tangible reminders of our heritage and their preservation helps keep our denominational legacy alive. For further information about the forty Heritage Landmarks or to learn how a place becomes so designated, please contact the General Secretary, General Commission on Archives and History, P.O. Box 127, Madison, NJ 07940. Material in this guide may be copied by local churches, Heritage Landmarks, and other agencies of The United Methodist Church without further approval. ISBN no. 1-880927-19-5 General Commission on Archives and History P.O. Box 127, 36 Madison Ave. Madison, NJ 07940 ©2012 The Heritage Landmarks of United Methodism A Traveler's Guide TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: 1-9 Look to the rock from which you were hewn... The United Methodist Story in its Heritage Landmarks Heritage Landmarks: 10-101 ALABAMA 10-11 Asbury Manual Labor School/Mission, Fort Mitchell 10-11 DELAWARE 12-13 Barratt's Chapel and Museum, Frederica 12-13 FLORIDA 14-15 Bethune-Cookman College/Foundation, Daytona Beach 14-15 GEORGIA 16-23 Town of Oxford, Oxford 16-17 John Wesley's American Parish, Savannah 18-19 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Allocation District #1 – I–16 / U.S
    TAX ALLOCATION DISTRICT #1 – I–16 / U.S. 301 INTERSTATE GATEWAY SEPTEMBER, 2012 Prepared for: Bulloch County, Georgia Prepared by: Bulloch County Tax Allocation District #1 – I-16/U.S. 301 Interstate Gateway TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................................. i I. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 The Opportunity .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Key Challenges .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Bulloch County TAD #1 – I–16 / U.S. 301 Interchange Qualifies as a TAD ............................................................................... 4 TAD Boundaries ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Proposed Development .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Assessment 2008
    COMMUNITYCOMMUNITY ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT GardenGarden CityCity ComprehensiveComprehensive PlanPlan Submitted to: GeorgiaGeorgia DepartmentDepartment ofof CommunityCommunity AffairsAffairs By: CityCity ofof GardenGarden CityCity December 31, 2007 COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT City of Garden City Comprehensive Plan Submitted to: Georgia Department of Community Affairs By: City of Garden City, Georgia December 31, 2007 Quality Place Planning Introduction The Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA) administers Rules for Local Comprehensive Planning for all Qualified Local Governments in Georgia. The purpose of this program is to provide guidance for long range planning that will accomplish the following goals as outlined by the DCA: • Involve all segments of the community in developing a vision for the community’s future; • Generate local pride and enthusiasm about the future of the community; • Engage the interest of citizens in implementing the plan; and • Provide a guide to everyday decision making for use by the local government officials and other community leaders. The Rules of Georgia Department of Community Affairs, Chapter 110-12-1: Standards and Procedures for Local Comprehensive Planning, “Local Planning Requirements,” were recently updated in May 2005. The updated guidelines require the completion of three major elements, the Community Assessment, Community Participation Plan, and Community Agenda as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The Community Assessment summarizes the local government’s evaluation of its development patterns, issues and opportunities, and level of compliance with the DCA’s Quality Community Objectives. The Community Participation Plan is a proposal for a community involvement program that will offer a wide range of opportunities to local citizens interested in participating in the development of the Comprehensive Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • An Administrative History, Ocmulgee National Monument
    D-Jb ~CMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT• AN ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY by Alan Marsh ettt'LtS •A.Tl••..tL llf$~lftflb:T C> 0 0 Ocmulgee National Monument Macon Georgia 1986 National Pan ~rvice United Stal~• Dtpartmmt of tlM lntuior AT1-,ENTION: Portions of this scanned document are illegible due to the poor quality of the source document. •. • ( .• • CONTENTS page F'rc~f 2,ce .•...•....• i More Thar) Mounds ................................... 4 New Mor1ument And New Deal ........................•.. 18 Acco1nodations For Interpretation ••.•..••.••...•.•••• 25 Admir1istration: The Beginning .•.••.••..••...•.•.•.• 39 Interstates, Indians, And Improvements •...•..••.•.•. 46 c:o1ilp r eh ens ion' Concern, Cooperation. 61 i'lotes Bibliography Appendices ILLUSTRr~TIONS 1. E~·~cav1:tti(Jns dLlring the 19~5r)'s Earthlodge exterior Earthlodge interior 4. Visitor center and solar panels 5. Wi:\yside el<hibit, 194·<) 6. Burial shelter 7. Lamar mounds, 1930's ( MAPS 1. Regional location of Ocmulgee National Monument 2. Ocmulgee National Monument L--· PREFACE The desire of the National Park Service to produce administrative histories led Southeast Regional Historian Lenard Brown to the campus of the University of Georgia late in 1983. Lester Stephens, Chairman of the history department, informed me of the quest by the Regional Historian for prospective authors and a meeting was subsequently arranged between myself anct Mr-. Brawn. A recent graduate of the University, I had written a paper concerning Ocmulgee National Monument and was eager to conduct additional research. A proposal to write an administrative history of Ocmulgee National Monument was accepted by Mr. Brown, who then contacted Superintendent Sibbald Smith at the monument. 8Ltper i ntendent Smith reacted favorably to the proposal and arrangements were made to employ me as a VIP !Volunteer In Parks) the following SL\mmer.
    [Show full text]