DOCSLIB.ORG

RESEARCH ARTICLE the Danish Runestones – When and Where? Lisbeth M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RESEARCH ARTICLE the Danish Runestones – When and Where? Lisbeth M Danish Journal of Archaeology, 2014 Vol. 3, No. 2, 164–174, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2015.1104905 RESEARCH ARTICLE The Danish runestones – when and where? Lisbeth M. Imer* The National Museum of Denmark, Frederiksholms Kanal 12, DK – 1220 Copenhagen K, Denmark (Received 6 Febuary 2015; accepted 24 September 2015) This article concerns the dating and distribution of Danish runestones from the eighth to the eleventh centuries. On the basis of both old and more recent investigations, the runestones are divided into five chronological periods each with their own characteristics and according to typological features regarding runes, language, style, and ornament. The majority of Danish runestones were erected within two generations after the conversion around AD 970–1020/25 and probably as a result of the stress and societal changes in connection with the advent of Christianity. The geographical distribution changed dramati- cally during the 400 year long runestone period and was probably due to the changing political situation. In the eighth and ninth centuries, runestones were mainly erected on Fyn, Sjælland, and Skåne. Runestones were almost exclusively erected in Jutland in the tenth century before the conversion and in the decades around the year 1000, runestones were erected in the north-eastern parts of Jutland and along the coast in Skåne. The runestone fashion died out in most parts of Denmark during the eleventh century, although on Bornholm the tradition began in the early eleventh century and came to an end within a few generations in the late eleventh century or around AD 1100. Keywords: runestones; chronology; distribution; Viking Age The tradition of erecting runestones in commemoration of runestones and written sources forms the basis of the family members, partners in business, and in rare cases chronology and within this framework different typologi- oneself was initiated during the Iron Age in Scandinavia cal features are used to try and fit the remainder of the except in Norway where the tradition started as early as runestones into an overall chronological picture. The typo- the Late Roman Iron Age (Imer 2011a). The tradition logical features vary according to the outline of each continued throughout the Iron and Viking Ages and lin- runestone and in many cases the runestones cannot be gered on into the very latest part of the eleventh century dated very accurately. The typological features are: orna- and maybe as late as around 1130 in some parts of mentation, the outline of the inscription, the length of the Scandinavia. The tradition started in the eighth century inscription, the nature of the textual content, the typology and came to an end in the early eleventh century in most of the runes, separation marks, and different stages and parts of Denmark. On Bornholm, it began in the early features of the language. eleventh century, when it had practically stopped in other The following analysis is based on earlier research and parts of the country, and it came to an end in the latest part adjusted to the results of new chronological improve- of the eleventh century. Around 260 runestones were ments. The chronological studies were carried out by erected during the 400 year long Danish tradition in the Marie Stoklund and some of the latest dates relevant to Danish area including Skåne, Halland, Blekinge, and this article were published in 2006 (Stoklund 2006.p. Schleswig. The distribution of runestones differed during 366–72). In this article, Stoklund incorporates the archae- the long timespan as did the number of erected stones, for ologically or historically dated objects into a discussion of, example, more stones were erected after the conversion first and foremost, the beginning and end of the runestone than in the previous periods. This article concentrates on tradition in Denmark, the central runestones of the Viking the dating and the distribution of the Danish runestones in Age (the Jelling, Hedeby and Bække-Læborg stones), and order to present an overview of the chronological layout of into a discussion on the appearance of the dotted runes. the Danish runestone tradition. The following presents an overview of earlier attempts to The method for establishing a runestone chronology create a runestone chronology, an outline of the present follows almost the same pattern as the construction of chronology based on Stoklund’s work and recent investi- chronologies for other types of artefacts or monuments, gations of the dating of the runestone material. The dates however, as the runestones are made of stone, methods correspond with those presented in the online database such as radiocarbon dating and dendrochronology are http://runer.ku.dk, which has been established by runolo- excluded. The evidence of a connection between gists from the University of Copenhagen and the National *Email: [email protected] © The Partnership of the Danish Journal of Archaeology 2016 Danish Journal of Archaeology 165 Museum of Denmark. Further information on the runes- dated to the first half of the tenth century in DR (Jacobsen tones mentioned in the text can be retrieved from this and Moltke 1942, p. 79, p. 1013), whereas Harald’s stone website. was dated to c. 985. The stone had to have been erected The earliest attempt to establish a chronology for the after 970, when Harald had gained control over Norway, Danish runestones was carried out by Ludvig F. A. and the passage “won for himself all of Denmark’ would Wimmer in the late nineteenth century in connection with point to the siege of Hedeby in 983. It was concluded that his publications of the runic monuments in Denmark the inscription must have been erected in the mid 980’sas (Wimmer 1893-1908). According to Wimmer not less Harald died in 987 (Jacobsen and Moltke 1942, p. 77, p. than 18 monuments could be dated historically, as they 1013). Two of the Hedeby stones that Asfrid erected in mentioned historically known persons or events. These memory of Sigtryg, her son with Gnupa, have to date after were the two Jelling stones, the four Hedeby stones, 934 when Gnupa, according to the historian Widukind, Sønder Vissing 1, the three Hällestad stones, Sjörup, Års, was defeated by the German king Henry the Fowler. In two of the Århus stones (Århus 1 and 3), Kolind, Sjelle, DR, the two younger Hedeby stones were the subject of an Nylarsker 2 and Norra Åsum. These were dated to between internal discussion between Jacobsen and Moltke. c. 935 and c. 1010, apart from the Nylarsker stone I (dated Jacobsen thought the stones mentioned Sven Estridsen, to c. 1050) and the Norra Åsum stone (dated to c.1210) who reigned in the mid-eleventh century, whereas (Wimmer, 1893-1908, p. CLXXIX). In addition to the Moltke held them to be connected to Sven Forkbeard’s historically datable monuments he listed a number of stones reign. with religious inscriptions which could be placed on either The DR chronology was based on the abovementioned side of the Conversion. Wimmer stressed that the dating of historically dated monuments and events together with the these stones was not as accurate as the historically dated historically datable medieval inscriptions. The runic mate- monuments because the runestones contained heathen fea- rial was divided into four periods, period 2 being the tures, such as the Thor’s hammer, and were not reliable in Viking Age. The typological features were described on the chronological analysis (Wimmer, 1893-1908,p. this basis and the remainder of the runic material was CLXXX-CLXXXI). The remainder of the runic monu- placed within the four periods. To the authors, it was ments was placed in relation to the historically dated stones important to stress that the classification was typological by means of language and rune forms, which gave a rela- and that an inscription belonging to one period could be of tive chronology for most of the material. Finally, when the same age as inscriptions belonging to other typological none of the abovementioned features were at hand, periods (Jacobsen and Moltke 1942, p. 1035). Wimmer estimated the date of the runestones according to ‘The listing of inscriptions is not a chronological tool the general character of the inscription or the monument for dating every single inscription. Generally, inscriptions (Wimmer, 1893-1908, p. CLXXXIV). on the same stage of development will belong in the same Wimmer’s method for building a chronology for period, but one certain type is not limited to one certain runestones has formed the methodological basis for runes- period. Archaic and new trends will always stretch over a tone dating and today his work stands as the pioneer work long period, so that one inscription, which typologically for modern runology. His dates have, of course, now been speaking belongs in one period, could be contemporary discussed and modified and other datable features such as with an inscription, which typologically speaking belongs ornament and style have been incorporated. in an earlier or later period.’ (Jacobsen and Moltke 1942, Danmarks Runeindskrifter (DR) (Jacobsen and Moltke author’s translation) 1942) included all the known runic inscriptions found in Typologies will always have overlaps and smooth Denmark at the time. The Viking Age chronology in DR transitions from one phase to another as is seen in the was based on Jacobsen’s critique of Wimmer’s perception Swedish runestone material, where overlaps between the of the historically dated runestones, which she had pub- different style groups occur (Gräslund 1998, p. 86). lished as early as the 1930s (Jacobsen 1932, 1935). In her Gräslund’s chronology is mainly restricted to the runes- article Jacobsen only accepted six monuments as histori- tones of the eleventh century and takes into consideration cally datable, namely the two Hedeby stones mentioning the ornamentation and the typology along with the outline King Sigtryg, Gnupa’s son, the Jelling stones, the stone in of the snake heads, Pr 1 to Pr 4 (Pr being the abbreviation Sønder Vissing, erected by Tove, Harald Gorm’s son’s of ‘profile’), with which the stones were decorated.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handbook for International Programs at the Danish School of Media and Journalism, Copenhagen Campus
    October 14 Handbook for International Programs at the Danish School of Media and Journalism, Copenhagen Campus 1 WELCOME TO DANISH SCHOOL OF MEDIA AND JOURNALISM 4 THE INDUSTRY SEAL OF APPROVAL 4 OTHER ACTIVITIES 4 THE COURSES 4 ATTENDANCE AND GRADING 4 ATTENDANCE IS MANDATORY 4 GRADING 4 COMPARATIVE TABLE OF GRADING SYSTEMS 5 AT DMJX 5 COMPUTERS AND E-MAIL 5 PHOTOCOPIERS 6 LIBRARY 6 CLASS ROOMS 6 DANISH LANGUAGE COURSE 6 TEACH YOURSELF DANISH - ONLINE 6 THINGS TO DO BEFORE ARRIVAL IN DENMARK 6 GRANTS AND SCHOLARSHIPS 6 INSURANCE 7 ACCOMMODATION IN COPENHAGEN 7 OFFICIAL PAPERS 8 RESIDENCE PERMIT 8 EMBASSIES 8 CIVIL PERSONAL REGISTRATION NUMBER 8 HOW TO APPLY FOR A CPR NUMBER 8 CHANGE OF ADDRESS 8 PRACTICALITIES 9 MOBILE PHONES 9 BANKS AND CREDIT CARDS 9 SENDING PARCELS TO DENMARK 9 TRANSPORT IN DENMARK 9 BUDGET & FINANCES 9 TAXATION 10 OTHER INFORMATION 10 PACKING YOUR SUITCASE 10 OTHER USEFUL THINGS: 10 JOB VACANCIES 11 2 NICE TO KNOW 11 FACTS ABOUT DENMARK 11 FRIENDS AND FAMILY DROPPING IN? 15 USEFUL LINKS FOR INFORMATION ABOUT DENMARK & COPENHAGEN 15 WEATHER 15 3 Welcome to Danish School of Media and Journalism A warm welcome to the Danish School of Media and Journalism (DMJX) and a new environment that hopefully will give you both professional and social challenges over the next semester. Our goal is to give you the best basis for both a professional and a social development. The industry seal of approval All programmes are very vocational and built on tasks which closely reflect the real world.
    [Show full text]
  • Ragnarocks You Take on the Role of a Viking Clan Using Runestones to Mark Your Clan’S Claims of Land
    1 1 IN NORSE MYTHOLOGY, HUMANS EXIST IN THE LAND OF MIDGARD - A PLACE IN THE CENTER OF THE WORLD TREE AND CONNECTED TO THE NINE REALMS. AMONG THESE NINE REALMS LIVE GODS AND GODDESSES, SERPENTS AND SPIRITS, AND ALL MANNER OF MYTHICAL AND MYSTICAL CREATURES. In Ragnarocks you take on the role of a Viking clan using Runestones to mark your clan’s claims of land. In the advanced game, your clan worships one of these powerful beings from another realm who lends you their power to help you outwit rivals and claim territories for your clan. At the end of the game, the clan who controls the most territory in Midgard wins! Contents Heimdallr Odin Guardian of Asgard Sól Ruler of the Aesir Goddess of the Sun Art Coming Soon Art Coming Soon Art Coming Soon SETUP: Draw two additional Mythology Powers with [Odin icon] andCommand hold them. cards. These are your START OF YOUR TURN: AT THE END OF YOUR TURN: You may relocate one of your vikings Settled You may either play a Command card this turn to any unoccupied space that was from your hand, or pick up all your played BEFORE YOUR MOVE: not Settled at the beginning of this turn. You may Move one space with Command cards. If you play a Command your Selected Viking card, you gain(ignore that setuppower powers). until your next turn 32 Mythology Cards 40 Runestones 6 Viking Pawns 1 Tree Stand 1 Game Insert Board 2 3 basic game setup 1 Remove game pieces from the insert and set them where all players can reach them.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Rune Stones
    29 Minoru Ozawa King’s Rune Stones A Catalogue with Some Remarks Minoru OZAWA For those who are interested in Danish history the Jelling dynasty from the second half of the 10th century to 1042 has had a special meaning. The successive 6 kings, i.e. Gorm the Old (–958), Harald Bluetooth (–987), Swein Forkbeard (–1014), Harald (–1018), Canute the Great (–1035), and Hardecnut (–1042), transformed a small Danish kingdom into one of the most influential states in Northern Europe in the 11th century.1 After Gorm and Harald made steadier the foundation of the kingdom the following kings expanded their stage of activty westward to gain booty with their army. In 1013 Swein conquered England to take the crown into his hand and, after his sudden death, his son Canute reconquered the kingdom to be the king of England in 1018 and king of Norway later in 1028. At the time the Jelling dynasty reigned over three kingdoms which surrounded the North Sea.2 While it is important to reevaluate the rule of the Jelling dynasty from the viewpoint of European political history, we should remember another important activity by the Danes: raising rune stones in memory of the dead. According to Sawyer’s catalogue, the corpus consisting of 200 rune stones is left to the present days as stones themselves or drawings in early modern age in the territory of medieval 1 Concerning the basic information of the Jelling dynasty, see Thorkild Ramskou, Normannertiden 600–1060. København 1962, pp. 415–; Aksel E. Christensen, Vikingetidens Danmark paa oldhistorisk baggrund.
    [Show full text]
  • Herjans Dísir: Valkyrjur, Supernatural Femininities, and Elite Warrior Culture in the Late Pre-Christian Iron Age
    Herjans dísir: Valkyrjur, Supernatural Femininities, and Elite Warrior Culture in the Late Pre-Christian Iron Age Luke John Murphy Lokaverkefni til MA–gráðu í Norrænni trú Félagsvísindasvið Herjans dísir: Valkyrjur, Supernatural Femininities, and Elite Warrior Culture in the Late Pre-Christian Iron Age Luke John Murphy Lokaverkefni til MA–gráðu í Norrænni trú Leiðbeinandi: Terry Gunnell Félags- og mannvísindadeild Félagsvísindasvið Háskóla Íslands 2013 Ritgerð þessi er lokaverkefni til MA–gráðu í Norrænni Trú og er óheimilt að afrita ritgerðina á nokkurn hátt nema með leyfi rétthafa. © Luke John Murphy, 2013 Reykjavík, Ísland 2013 Luke John Murphy MA in Old Nordic Religions: Thesis Kennitala: 090187-2019 Spring 2013 ABSTRACT Herjans dísir: Valkyrjur, Supernatural Feminities, and Elite Warrior Culture in the Late Pre-Christian Iron Age This thesis is a study of the valkyrjur (‘valkyries’) during the late Iron Age, specifically of the various uses to which the myths of these beings were put by the hall-based warrior elite of the society which created and propagated these religious phenomena. It seeks to establish the relationship of the various valkyrja reflexes of the culture under study with other supernatural females (particularly the dísir) through the close and careful examination of primary source material, thereby proposing a new model of base supernatural femininity for the late Iron Age. The study then goes on to examine how the valkyrjur themselves deviate from this ground state, interrogating various aspects and features associated with them in skaldic, Eddic, prose and iconographic source material as seen through the lens of the hall-based warrior elite, before presenting a new understanding of valkyrja phenomena in this social context: that valkyrjur were used as instruments to propagate the pre-existing social structures of the culture that created and maintained them throughout the late Iron Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Henrik Williams. Scripta Islandica 65/2014
    Comments on Michael Lerche Nielsen’s Paper HENRIK WILLIAMS The most significant results of Michael Lerche Nielsen’s contribution are two fold: (1) There is a fair amount of interaction between Scandinavians and Western Slavs in the Late Viking Age and Early Middle Ages — other than that recorded in later medieval texts (and through archaeology), and (2) This interaction seems to be quite peaceful, at least. Lerche Nielsen’s inventory of runic inscriptions and name material with a West Slavic connection is also good and very useful. The most important evidence to be studied further is that of the place names, especially Vinderup and Vindeboder. The former is by Lerche Niel­ sen (p. 156) interpreted to contain vindi ‘the western Slav’ which would mean a settlement by a member of this group. He compares (p. 156) it to names such as Saxi ‘person from Saxony’, Æistr/Æisti/Æist maðr ‘person from Estonia’ and Tafæistr ‘person from Tavastland (in Finland)’. The problem here, of course, is that we do not know for sure if these persons really, as suggested by Lerche Nielsen, stem ethnically from the regions suggested by their names or if they are ethnic Scandi navians having been given names because of some connection with non­Scandi navian areas.1 Personally, I lean towards the view that names of this sort are of the latter type rather than the former, but that is not crucial here. The importance of names such as Æisti is that it does prove a rather intimate connection on the personal plane between Scandinavians and non­Scan dinavians.
    [Show full text]
  • W Orld Heritage in Denmark and Greenland
    Midway between the mounds are the two runic The church between the two mounds is built of calcareous In Denmark, the Heritage Agency of Denmark is responsible stones. The larger stone bears what is probably the tufa (travertine) around 1080-1100. A tower was added for submitting new proposals for inclusion on the World Heritage List. A special committee under UNESCO decides most significant inscription in the history of Denmark: in the 15th century. This church was preceded by three whether to include the proposed candidates on the list. World Heritage in Denmark and Greenland World The Jelling Monuments ‘King Harald bade this monument to be made in wooden churches. The first wooden church was 14 x 30 Being nominated for inclusion on the World Heritage memory of Gorm his father and Thyra his mother, metres somewhat bigger than the present one. It was List does not in itself imply any new form of protection, but it does provide additional recognition and status. that Harald who won for himself all Denmark and presumably built by Harald Bluetooth. It is believed that Norway and made the Danes Christian’. The message his father, King Gorm, was moved from the north mound A worldwide presentation of the cultural and natural is carved on three sides of the large stone. On one and buried in a chambered tomb in the exact place where heritage of mankind is given on UNESCO’s website at www.unesco.org. The world heritage of Greenland is of the sides there is also a carved image of Christ. The the nave and the chancel adjoin.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology and Typology of the Danish Runic Inscriptions
    Chronology and Typology of the Danish Runic Inscriptions Marie Stoklund Since c. 1980 a number of important new archaeological runic finds from the old Danish area have been made. Together with revised datings, based for instance on dendrochronology or 14c-analysis, recent historical as well as archaeological research, these have lead to new results, which have made it evident that the chronology and typology of the Danish rune material needed adjustment. It has been my aim here to sketch the most important changes and consequences of this new chronology compared with the earlier absolute and relative ones. It might look like hubris to try to outline the chronology of the Danish runic inscriptions for a period of nearly 1,500 years, especially since in recent years the lack of a cogent distinction between absolute and relative chronology in runological datings has been criticized so severely that one might ask if it is possible within a sufficiently wide framework to establish a trustworthy chro- nology of runic inscriptions at all. However, in my opinion it is possible to outline a chronology on an interdisciplinary basis, founded on valid non-runo- logical, external datings, combined with reliable linguistic and typological cri- teria deduced from the inscriptions, even though there will always be a risk of arguing in a circle. Danmarks runeindskrifter A natural point of departure for such a project consists in the important attempt made in Danmarks runeindskrifter (DR) to set up an outline of an overall chro- nology of the Danish runic inscriptions. The article by Lis Jacobsen, Tidsfæst- else og typologi (DR:1013–1042 cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Cunningham Tarpaulin Sky in Utero
    ! TWO: THE ICE LAND ICE ARENA cold eyes blue eyes cold eyes dead eyes red eyes dead eyes what breaks the eyes skates up and down the eyes up, the eyes down the eyes, cold eyes bite cold eyes blue eyes cold eyes on thin eyes, you’re on thin eyes skating, wound on eyes, skating red eyes A-20 Aircraft— Wagner’s Valkyries knows, dives a soldier’s nerves Chassis— grief stains, skeleton of screaming metal priceless lie-down Engine— auto-translation power supply with mess, with Wooden Box— ice jamming coffin-lidded gorged on 8s Runestone— hell-raised audience guide all, different voices A-20 Aircraft— hell-raised coffin-lidded priceless lie-down Chassis— audience guide a soldier’s nerves ice jamming Engine— grief stains, skeleton with mess, with auto-translation Wooden Box— of screaming metal knows, dives all, different voices Runestone— gorged on 8s Wagner’s Valkyries power supply A-20 Aircraft— grief stains, skeleton gorged on 8s audience guide Chassis— a soldier’s nerves of screaming metal with mess, with Engine— Wagner’s Valkyries knows, dives power supply Wooden Box— all, different voices ice jamming coffin-lidded Runestone— auto-translation priceless lie-down hell-raised A-20 Aircraft— coffin-lidded priceless lie-down hell-raised Chassis— of screaming metal with mess, with grief stains, skeleton Engine— power supply knows, dives ice jamming Wooden Box— gorged on 8s a soldier’s nerves all, different voices Runestone— Wagner’s Valkyries auto-translation audience guide A-20 Aircraft— of screaming metal audience guide with mess, with Chassis—
    [Show full text]
  • Vocalism in the Continental Runic Inscriptions
    VOCALISM IN THE CONTINENTAL RUNIC INSCRIPTIONS Martin Findell, MA. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2009 Volume II: Catalogue Notes on catalogue entries ................................................................................vii Designation of items .....................................................................................vii Concordance .................................................................................................vii Find-site ........................................................................................................vii Context ..........................................................................................................vii Provenance .................................................................................................. viii Datings ........................................................................................................ viii Readings ..................................................................................................... viii Images ............................................................................................................. x 1. Aalen ............................................................................................................... 1 2. Aquincum ....................................................................................................... 2 3. †Arguel ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Literacy and Christian Identity Are Two Sides of the Same Coin When Dealing with Late Viking Age Rune Stones
    “Dead in White Clothes”: Modes of Christian Expression on Viking Age Rune Stones in Present-Day Sweden By Henrik Williams 2009 (Submitted version - the early author's version that has been submitted to the journal/publisher). Published as: Williams, Henrik: “Dead in White Clothes”: Modes of Christian Expression on Viking Age Rune Stones in Present-Day Sweden. I: Epigraphic Literacy and Christian Identity: Modes of Written Discourse in the Newly Christian European North. Ed. by Kristel Zilmer & Judith Jesch. (Utrecht Studies in Medieval Literacy 4.) Turnhout 2012. Pp. 137‒152. Practical literacy and Christian identity are two sides of the same coin when dealing with late Viking age rune stones. Reading the inscriptions on these monuments are by necessity not a straight-forward process for us today. The printed word we are familiar with is different in so many ways when compared to the usually very short and sometimes enigmatic messages we encounter in the form of runic carvings on rocks and cliffs throughout Scandinavia. The difficulties which we expect and take into account are not, however, primarily the main obstacles to our complete understanding of the rune stone texts. In one respect, these problems are superficial, dealing with formal restrictions of the media and the writing system. As is well known, the Viking age runic characters only numbered 16 (with the addition of three optional variants. Since the language(s) contained quite a few speech signs more than that, most runes could be use with more than one value and it is up to the reader to determine exactly which.
    [Show full text]
  • Rune Carvers and Sponsor Families on Bornholm
    DANISH JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY 2019, VOL 8, 1-21 1 Rune Carvers and Sponsor Families on Bornholm Laila Kitzler Åhfeldt1 and Lisbeth M. Imer2 1 (Corresponding author) Swedish National Heritage Board, PO Box 1114, 621 22 Visby, Sweden ([email protected]) ORCID: 0000-0001-8364-59-52 2 Nationalmuseet, Frederiksholms Kanal 12, 1220 København K, Denmark ([email protected]) ORCID: 0000-0003-4895-1916 ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The runestones on Bornholm have for a long time aroused discussion due to their singular Received 09 April 2019; character and dating as compared to most runestones in other parts of Denmark. In this Accepted 12 Sep- paper, the relations between sponsors and rune carvers have been investigated through tember 2019 analysis of the carving technique by means of the first 3D-scanning and multivariate statisti- KEYWORDS cal analysis ever carried out on the Danish runestone material. The results indicate that the Runestone; Bornholm; carvers were attached to the sponsor families and that the carvers were probably members 3D-scanning; Rune of those families. During the fieldwork, a fragment of a previously unknown runestone was carver; Sponsor; documented in the church of St. Knud. Carving technique Introduction identity. A completely different source of evidence will be used here, namely the carving technique, When the runestones of Bornholm were raised, which will be studied by 3D-scanning and multi- the practice of erecting runestones had already de- variate statistical methods, following a method de- creased dramatically in other Danish areas, where veloped at the Archaeological Research Laboratory, the number of runestones had fallen to the same lev- Stockholm University (Kitzler Åhfeldt 2002) and el as before around 965, when the king claimed to further refined in various research projects (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Myths of the Rune Stone: Viking Martyrs and the Birthplace of America
    book review Myths of the Rune Stone: Viking Martyrs For example, Krueger’s and the Birthplace of America take on the local and reli- David M. Krueger gious dimensions of the (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015, 214 p., stone’s history is original. Paper, $24.95.) He excellently explores how the stone became a near- Many places claim to be the birthplace of America, but few sacred artifact even outside have been as contested as the one near Kensington, Minnesota. the Scandinavian American The source of this claim, a stone slab unearthed in 1898, is the ethnic community. Krueger subject of David Krueger’s Myths of the Rune Stone. This first shows how in the 1920s the comprehensive book about the popular meaning of the Kens- stone— by way of a failed ington Rune Stone is a welcome contribution to the study of its plan for a massive 200- foot historiography and to the impact of local culture on an Ameri- monument— became a can origin myth. tool of small- town booster- Since its discovery by a Swedish- born farmer, the Kensing- ism. In 1928, the stone was ton Rune Stone’s claim that Norsemen were present in what purchased by a group of is now Minnesota in the year 1362 has been a topic of heated Alexandria businessmen controversy. Although scholars of Scandinavian languages and and put on display in a downtown bank. To the Alexandria runology (the study of runic inscriptions) have long agreed community, the stone was a source of prestige and a strategy about its nineteenth- century origin, the stone has continued to to promote tourism.
    [Show full text]