Researching Education Outcomes in Burundi, Malawi, Senegal and Uganda: Using Participatory Tools and Collaborative Approaches

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Researching Education Outcomes in Burundi, Malawi, Senegal and Uganda: Using Participatory Tools and Collaborative Approaches Researching education outcomes in Burundi, Malawi, Senegal and Uganda: using participatory tools and collaborative approaches Dr. Karen Edge Akanksha A. Marphatia Elise Legault David Archer The Improving Learning Outcomes in Primary Schools (ILOPS) Project | Project methodology Funding: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation in partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation May 2010 © Institute of Education and ActionAid Table of Contents Section Page Executive summary 6 Context 8 Section 1 Current knowledge 11 Current knowledge on participatory approaches involving stakeholders to address children's learning 11 Implications of literature review on the ILOPS collaborative approach 11 Section 2 Building ILOPS partnerships 12 Recruiting the international, national and local researchers 12 The constituencies involved in multi-stakeholder research teams 13 Strategies for coordinating national-level team involvement 15 Section 3 Designing the ILOPS research framework 17 Pre-workshop activities and agenda setting 17 Workshop 1 – the Sesse cross-country research design workshop 18 Mapping expertise: what makes a good research team? 20 Developing the ILOPS conceptual framework 22 Focusing the ILOPS research 23 Generating and testing interview instruments 24 Next steps 25 Section 4 In-country data collection, analysis and validation process 26 Research process 26 In-country data analysis and validation workshops 27 Section 5 Cross-country findings 28 Workshop 2: Discussing cross-country findings 28 Section 6 Lessons learned on collaborative approaches 2 9 Learning on collaborative approaches 29 Challenges 30 Recommendations for future practice 30 Section 7 Recommendations for improving learning outcomes 3 1 Findings from ILOPS research 31 Examples of follow-on work 32 Conclusion 32 Bibliography 34 3 4 SECTION 1 Acronyms ANCEFA African National Coalition on Education for All CERT Centre for Education, Research and Training, Malawi CONFEMEN Conference of Ministers of Education of the Francophonie (Conférence des Ministres de l’Education des pays ayant le français en partage) CRC Covenant on the Rights of the Child CSCQBE Civil Society Coalition for Quality Basic Education, Malawi CSO Civil Society Organisation COSYDEP Coalition of Teachers Unions and Education Organisations, Senegal EI Education International FENU Forum for Education Non Governmental Organisations in Uganda GCE Global Campaign for Education IDEC Institute of Economic Development, Burundi ILOPS Improving Learning Outcomes in Primary Schools Project INEADE National Institute of Research and Action for the Development of Education, Senegal IoE Institute of Education, University of London KADEFO Kalangala District Education Forum, Uganda MADEN Masindi District Education Coalition, Uganda MAPSA Malawi Parent Association MoE Ministry of Education PASEC Programme for Analysing Education Systems (Programme d’Analyse des Systèmes Educatifs) SACMEQ Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality SAED Education for All Coalition, Burundi TANARD Target National Relief and Development, Mchinji District, Malawi UGAADEN Uganda Adult Education Network UNATU Uganda National Teachers Union 5 Executive summary Over the past decade, over 40 million In January 2008, ActionAid, the Institute of Education, m o re children, many of them girls, have University of London (IoE) and partners in Burundi, Malawi, Uganda and Senegal studied the role of attended school worldwide (EFA GMR, parents and teachers in enhancing learning outcomes. 2 0 1 01). While this has been cause for The Improving Learning Outcomes in Primary Schools celebration in many countries, there are (ILOPS) Project was supported by the Quality persistent and increasing concerns Education in Developing Countries Initiative of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation in partnership that, in spite of this significant incre a s e with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Findings from in school attendance rates, children are the ILOPS Project are presented in three separate not actually gaining the knowledge briefs exploring teacher quality, parental participation nor developing the skills that will and, this paper, exploring our tools and approaches. realistically improve their life chances. This paper outlines the participatory research methodology employed by the ILOPS Project team. Though there are many strategies for We provide details on the development and i m p roving student learning, two implementation of our approach as well as the lessons i n fluential factors that appear learned throughout the process for others interested f requently in academic literature are in following similar approaches. The other two briefs discuss the outcomes of the parental participation teaching/teacher quality and pare n t a l and teacher quality components of the survey. involvement in childre n ’s education (Edge et al., 2009a). However, the The IoE led the development of the overall ILOPS criteria defining how teachers and collaborative methodology and engaged Project p a rents best contribute to meaningful participants in jointly designing the various participatory tools. We hoped that by bringing parents, teachers, c h i l d - c e n t red learning remain a subject unions, coalitions, research institutes and Ministry of active international debate. officials together to do the research, a deeper understanding of the reasons why learning outcomes fail to improve would evolve. The goal was to create a 1 This and all other references in this paper are cited from the literature review by Edge et al. (2009a). The full review, which is published alongside the four comparative briefs, summarised 100 (out of a total of 573 identified) relevant articles on the factors that make parents 6 decide to participate in their children’s schools, and the influence of this participation on student learning outcomes. lasting platform where these stakeholders could The methods used to support this type of joint work discuss their roles and commit to finding practical yet merit further exploration. We believe that they offer an innovative strategies to improving learning. innovative way of working, not only with respect to research, but also for improving the content and The ILOPS team was committed to ensuring all implementation of policies and programmes. The stakeholders were equally and fully involved in each absence of genuine, long-term collaboration has partly stage of the process. This included identifying research contributed to today’s poor performance in schools. team members, designing the survey instruments, Misconceptions about the roles of teachers and collecting the evidence base, analysing the results and parents and the lack of empathy towards each other’s proposing ideas for follow-on activities. This constraints in supporting students create tension. engagement necessitated deeper discussions of Teachers, who themselves are frustrated by the lack of participants’ own roles and contributions with respect support and training, continue to be blamed for poor to both the project itself and the notion of improving the classroom performance. Parents, often lacking the quality of schooling for all students. know-how and access to schools are seen to be disinterested in their children’s education. There are Committing to a methodology which promotes ongoing also misunderstandings between academics and collaboration involves thoughtful design of workshops researchers. As a result, researchers frequently study and spaces for regular discussion. Careful consideration teachers’ and parents’ roles in an isolated manner. The of team dynamics, patience and open communication is results are then shared with peers and policy-makers, important. Shared leadership, clear responsibilities and but not with the civil society organisations (CSOs), accountability are fundamental to building a good team. parents, communities and teachers who could At first it was challenging to balance the unique effectively reflect on and implement the expertise and knowledge of team members while trying recommendations. The ILOPS approach aimed to to facilitate the collection of a robust evidence base. It challenge these traditions by bringing the different required each participant to question their own biases stakeholders together to jointly diagnose and solve the around research, participation and the expectations of problem. By working closely together, we believe we other stakeholders. can achieve an improvement in learning outcomes. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Context Current literature on improving learning often focuses Learning assessments and test results should not on policy, structural and system-level changes as well be the only way to measure success in school or as a range of other technical and physical inputs. Few education quality. Most countries do not have a clearly studies focus on the role of stakeholders, in particular established definition of what ‘quality’ of education parents and teachers, in improving learning and yet constitutes, although reference to international human these two groups are potentially the most influential in rights standards is helpful. The ILOPS Project therefore determining the relative success of education. Parents adopts the definition provided by the Covenant on the decide whether to invest in their children’s education. Rights of the Child (CRC) which states, ‘Every child has Their actions at home and within schools are likely to the right to receive an education of good quality which influence whether or not
Recommended publications
  • Business Ethics As Field of Training, Teaching and Research in Francophone Africa
    Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Original Business Ethics as field of training, teaching and Article research in Francophone Africa Liboire Kagabo Department of African Languages and Literature, University of Burundi, Burundi ABSTRACT This article has been written within the framework of the Global Survey of Business Ethics 2010. It is seemingly the first attempt to investigate Business Ethics as academic field in Francophone Africa. After a discussion of methodological considerations, the article provides an overview of how Business Ethics is distributed in Francophone Africa. Even though, it is not well established in that part of Africa, some interesting data have been found in some countries like Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ivory Coast, Rwanda and Senegal. Business Ethics has been investigated in three areas: teaching, training and research. In Francophone Africa, teaching Business Ethics does not seem to be a reality in traditional faculties of Economics, Management or Commerce. Training in Business Ethics, however, is a reality in Francophone Africa, notably with the non-governmental organizations that deal with political and economic governance, development, and women and gender issues. Research on Business Ethics can be found in journals, bulletins, consultancy reports, university term papers, seminars and colloquia as well as in books. Key words: Business Ethics, Teaching, Training, Research, Francophone Africa INTRODUCTION Madagascar. For the purpose of the survey some French speaking countries in West For the purpose of the Global Survey of Africa, namely Cameroun, Tchad, Niger, Business Ethics 2010, the world was divided Benin and Togo was however included in into nine world regions, one of which was the the West African region.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi-SCD-Final-06212018.Pdf
    Document of The World Bank Report No. 122549-BI Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI ADDRESSING FRAGILITY AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHALLENGES TO REDUCE POVERTY AND BOOST SUSTAINABLE GROWTH Public Disclosure Authorized SYSTEMATIC COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC June 15, 2018 Public Disclosure Authorized International Development Association Country Department AFCW3 Africa Region International Finance Corporation (IFC) Sub-Saharan Africa Department Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) Sub-Saharan Africa Department Public Disclosure Authorized BURUNDI - GOVERNMENT FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective as of December 2016) Currency Unit = Burundi Franc (BIF) US$1.00 = BIF 1,677 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACLED Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project AfDB African Development Bank BMM Burundi Musangati Mining CE Cereal Equivalent CFSVA Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Assessment CNDD-FDD Conseil National Pour la Défense de la Démocratie-Forces pour la Défense de la Démocratie (National Council for the Defense of Democracy-Forces for the Defense of Democracy) CPI Consumer Price Index CPIA Country Policy and Institutional Assessment DHS Demographic and Health Survey EAC East African Community ECVMB Enquête sur les Conditions de Vie des Menages au Burundi (Survey on Household Living Conditions in Burundi) ENAB Enquête Nationale Agricole du Burundi (National Agricultural Survey of Burundi) FCS Fragile and conflict-affected situations FDI Foreign Direct Investment FNL Forces Nationales
    [Show full text]
  • (CDS-TFE): the Case of Refugee Students and Challenges for Administrators, Teachers, and Counselors∗
    Connexions module: m37446 1 Educating Culturally Displaced Students with Truncated Formal Education (CDS-TFE): The Case of Refugee Students and Challenges for Administrators, Teachers, and Counselors∗ Athanase Gahungu Olive Gahungu Florah Luseno This work is produced by The Connexions Project and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License y Abstract From 2006 to 2008, refugee resettlement agencies brought 4018 refugees to Chicago, Illinois. Using the example of the challenges faced by 14 refugee students from Burundi in adjusting to the U.S. school system, the authors call the attention of schools to the distinction between educating English Language Learners (ELL) and Educating Culturally Displaced Students with Truncated Formal Education (CDS- TFE). These authors also question the appropriateness of social promotion practices by which these students with truncated formal education are placed several grade levels above their actual educational attainment in U.S. schools, regardless of their school interruptions or limited school readiness. Principles and strategies for responsive integration of CDS-TFE in the U.S. educational systems are also explored. note: This manuscript has been peer-reviewed, accepted, and endorsed by the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA) as a signicant contribution to the scholarship and practice of education administration. In addition to publication in the Connexions Content ∗Version 1.2: Apr 17, 2011 9:16 am GMT-5 yhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://cnx.org/content/m37446/1.2/ Connexions module: m37446 2 Commons, this module is published in the International Journal of Educational Leadership Prepa- ration,1 Volume 6, Number 2 (April - June, 2011), ISSN 2155-9635.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating a Culture of Success in Catholic Secondary
    CULTIVATING A CULTURE OF SUCCESS IN CATHOLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN TANZANIA Dissertation Submitted to the School of Education Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Education By Fr Peter Asantebwana October, 2014 i Copyright by Fr Peter Asantebwana 2014 DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATE IN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) Presented by: Fr. Peter F. Asantebwana B.A., Theology, Pontifical Urbaniana University, 2001 M.Ed. and M.B.A., Walsh University, 2011 October 22, 2014 CULTIVATING A CULTURE OF SUCCESS IN CATHOLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN TANZANIA ________________________________________, Chair Gary D. Shank, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Educational Foundations & Leadership Duquesne University _______________________________________, Member Rick R. McCown, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Educational Foundations and Leadership and Director, Professional Doctorate in Educational Leadership Program Duquesne University _______________________________________, Member Launcelot I. Brown, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Chair, Department of Educational Foundations & Leadership Duquesne University _________________________________________, Member Ladislaus Semali, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Learning and Performance Systems Pennsylvania State University Program Director Rick R. McCown, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Educational Foundations Leadership and Director,
    [Show full text]
  • HIV DR in CENTRAL AFRICA
    WHO HIVRESNET STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING, November 10–12, 2009, Geneva, Switzerland HIV DR in CENTRAL AFRICA Pr Belabbes Intercountry Support Team Central Africa COUNTRIES COVERED BY THE INTERCOUNTRY SUPPORT TEAM / CENTRAL AFRICA Angola Burundi Cameroon Central African Republic Chad Congo Democratic Republic of Congo Equatorial Guinea Gabon Rwanda Sao Tome & Principe HIV PREVALENCE AMONG THE POPULATION Legend Generalized epidemic in 10 <1% countries /11 1-5% >5% Excepted Sao Tome& Principe nd HIV PREVALENCE AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN Legend <1% 1-5% >5% nd PATIENTS UNDER ART 2005-2008 70000 2005 2006 2007 2008 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 Angola Burundi Cameroon Congo Equatorial Gabon CAR DRC Rwanda Sao Tome Guinea Source of data Towards universal access: scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector. WHO, UNAIDS,UNICEF;September 2009. Training on HIVDR Protocols ANGOLA BURUNDI CAMEROON CENTRAL AFRICA REPUBLIC CHAD CONGO DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC CONGO EQUATORIAL GUINEA GABON RWANDA SAO TOME&PRINCIPE Training on HIVDR Protocols Douala, Cameroon 27-29 April 2009 The opening ceremony Participants to the Training on HIVDR Protocols, Douala Cameroon 27-29 April 2009 ON SITE STRENGTHENING CAPACITIES OF THE TECHNICAL WORKING GROUPS ANGOLA BURUNDI CAMEROON CENTRAL AFRICA REPUBLIC CHAD EQUATORIAL GUINEA RWANDA TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO DEVELOP HIVDR PROTOCOLS ANGOLA BURUNDI CAMEROON CENTRAL AFRICA REPUBLIC CHAD EQUATORIAL GUINEA RWANDA EARLY WARNING INDICATORS BURUNDI : EWI abstraction in 19 sites (October) using paper-based.
    [Show full text]
  • INEE Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) for Education in Emergencies, Chronic Crises, Early Recovery and Fragile Contexts
    INEE STRATEGIC RESEARCH AGENDA for Education in Emergencies, Chronic Crises, Early Recovery & Fragile Contexts The Conflict and Education Research Group at Oxford University & The Teachers College International Education Research Group February 2010 INEE Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) for Education in Emergencies, Chronic Crises, Early Recovery and Fragile Contexts Contents 1) What is the SRA? 3 2) SRA Background and Rationale 5 3) SRA Development Process 6 4) SRA Key Terms 7 5) Brief History of Research in EiE 8 6) Existing Research and Critical Research Gaps 14 Geographical Region 14 Crisis Contexts 16 Timing and Sequencing 18 Kind of Education 20 Educational Programming and Practice 22 Inter-Sectoral Linkages 24 Aid and Governance 25 Population 26 Conclusion 28 7) Current Research Challenges 28 Historical Base 29 Clarity around Definitions 30 Knowledge Management 30 Methodological Challenges 32 Academic and Practitioner Perspectives 33 The Relationship Between Advocacy and Research 34 Funding 35 Conclusion 35 8) Methodological and Ethical Considerations 36 Commonly Used Research Methods 37 Key Considerations when Selecting Research Methods 39 Research and Participation 40 Key Ethical Considerations 41 Conclusion 43 9) Methodology & Ethics Bibliography 43 10) Works Cited 45 2 INEE Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) for Education in Emergencies, Chronic Crises, Early Recovery and Fragile Contexts 1) What is the SRA? The INEE Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) is an evolving platform to engage and connect researchers, practitioners, policymakers and donors working in the field of Education in Emergencies (EiE).1 It aims to facilitate the expansion of the knowledge and evidence base in EiE by building collaborative consensus around research gaps, research themes for investigation and guiding research questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Burundi Peace Process
    ISS MONOGRAPH 171 ISS Head Offi ce Block D, Brooklyn Court 361 Veale Street New Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa Tel: +27 12 346-9500 Fax: +27 12 346-9570 E-mail: [email protected] Th e Burundi ISS Addis Ababa Offi ce 1st Floor, Ki-Ab Building Alexander Pushkin Street PEACE CONDITIONAL TO CIVIL WAR FROM PROCESS: THE BURUNDI PEACE Peace Process Pushkin Square, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Th is monograph focuses on the role peacekeeping Tel: +251 11 372-1154/5/6 Fax: +251 11 372-5954 missions played in the Burundi peace process and E-mail: [email protected] From civil war to conditional peace in ensuring that agreements signed by parties to ISS Cape Town Offi ce the confl ict were adhered to and implemented. 2nd Floor, Armoury Building, Buchanan Square An AU peace mission followed by a UN 160 Sir Lowry Road, Woodstock, South Africa Tel: +27 21 461-7211 Fax: +27 21 461-7213 mission replaced the initial SA Protection Force. E-mail: [email protected] Because of the non-completion of the peace ISS Nairobi Offi ce process and the return of the PALIPEHUTU- Braeside Gardens, Off Muthangari Road FNL to Burundi, the UN Security Council Lavington, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 20 386-1625 Fax: +254 20 386-1639 approved the redeployment of an AU mission to E-mail: [email protected] oversee the completion of the demobilisation of ISS Pretoria Offi ce these rebel forces by December 2008. Block C, Brooklyn Court C On 18 April 2009, at a ceremony to mark the 361 Veale Street ON beginning of the demobilisation of thousands New Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa DI Tel: +27 12 346-9500 Fax: +27 12 460-0998 TI of PALIPEHUTU-FNL combatants, Agathon E-mail: [email protected] ON Rwasa, leader of PALIPEHUTU-FNL, gave up AL www.issafrica.org P his AK-47 and military uniform.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform in Burundi: Waiting for Change After Twenty Years of Fruitless Debate
    Dominik Kohlhagen [email protected] Land reform in Burundi: Waiting for change after twenty years of fruitless debate INTRODUCTION Burundi is a landlocked country in East Africa, neighboring Rwanda, Tanzania and the Democratic Republic of Congo. With its 8,5 million inhabitants living on 28,000 square kilometres, it is comparable in size and inhabitants to Belgium or Catalonia. In Africa, it is the second most densely populated country after Rwanda. Its economy heavily depends on the agricultural sector and relies to a large extent on subsistence farming. Since independence from Belgium in 1962, Burundi has experienced several outbreaks of violence. Important interethnic massacres occurred in 1965, 1969, 1972, 1988 and 1991. Between 1993 and 2005, a civil war has caused hundreds of thousands of deaths. At all these occasions, people were displaced or had to seek refuge in neighboring countries, leaving behind their land and livestock. Following a relative political and military stabilization, many refugees have recently returned to Burundi and are now trying to recover their land. Demands for land or compensation by returning refugees are currently adding to many other problems caused by land scarcity and inappropriate land laws. The current land code of Burundi, which was promulgated only in 1986, is mainly a compilation of former colonial laws and retained most of the shortcomings of preceding texts. Under the 1986 code, the country saw a significant increase in land conflicts and many illegal land allocations. A reform of the land code has been discussed by government officials and international donors since the 1990s. But up to now, all these discussions proved fruitless.
    [Show full text]
  • African Elections in 2015: a Snapshot for Côte D'ivoire, Tanzania, Burkina
    AFRICAN ELECTIONS IN 2015: A SNAPSHOT FOR CÔTE D’IVOIRE, TANZANIA, BURKINA FASO AND SUDAN John Mukum Mbaku, Nonresident Senior Fellow, Africa Growth Initiative INTRODUCTION democratic constitution making to provide each country with institutional arrangements In 2015, many countries in Africa—including that guarantee the rule of law—where the the Burkina Faso, Burundi, Chad, Egypt, latter exists, the law is supreme; a majority of Ethiopia, Guinea, Libya, Mauritius, Niger, the citizens voluntarily accept and respect the South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo and law; there is judicial independence; the law is Zambia—will conduct presidential and/or not administered arbitrarily or capriciously but legislative elections. Most of these countries citizens are able to expect predictable results; have struggled with transition to democracy at there is protection of human rights, including least since the mid-1980s, and some of them those of minority ethnic and religious groups; much more recently. The 2015 elections, then, and governments operate in an open and for some, could be turning points for embrac- transparent manner. ing democracy more closely, and, for others, for significantly deepening and institutional- Openness and transparency are very important izing democracy and emerging as democratic for governance in Africa. Making certain that strongholds on the continent. public policies are designed and implemented in an open and transparent manner not only re- The failure to manage ethnic and religious di- duces corruption but also improves the chanc- versity and provide institutional structures that es that these policies will reflect the values, enhance peaceful coexistence, national inte- interests and aspirations of the country’s rele- gration and nation-building, remains one of vant stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi's Constitution of 2005
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:21 constituteproject.org Burundi's Constitution of 2005 Historical This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:21 Table of contents Preamble . 4 TITLE I: Of THE STATE AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE PEOPLE . 5 1. Of the General Principles . 5 2. OF THE FUNDAMENTAL VALUES . 6 TITLE II: OF THE CHARTER OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND CITIZEN . 7 1. OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE CITIZEN . 7 2. Of the Fundamental Responsibilities of the Individual and the Citizen . 12 TITLE III: OF THE SYSTEM OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES . 14 TITLE IV: OF ELECTIONS . 16 TITLE V: OF THE EXECUTIVE POWER . 17 1. Of the President of the Republic . 17 2. Of the Vice Presidents of the Republic . 22 3. Of Government . 23 Title VI: Of the Legislative Power . 26 1. The Provisions Common to the National Assembly and Senate . 26 2. Of the National Assembly . 30 3. Of the Senate . 33 4. Of the Procedure of Adopting New Law . 36 TITLE VII: OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE EXECUTIVE AND THE LEGISLATIVE . 37 TITLE VIII: OF THE JUDICIAL POWER . 40 1. Of the Superior Council of the Magistracy . 40 2. Of the Supreme Court . 42 3. Of the Constitutional Court . 42 4. OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE . 44 TITLE IX: OF THE OMBUDSMAN . 45 TITLE X: OF DEFENSE AND OF SECURITY . 45 TITLE XI: OF THE LOCAL COLLECTIVITIES .
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi Situation
    BURUNDI SITUATION The Burundi situation remains one of the least-funded refugee situations in the world. As of June 2020, 333,703 Burundian refugees were in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, the United Republic of Tanzania and Uganda. COVID-19 has exacerbated the already precarious UNHCR’s overall requirements for the Burundi condition of Burundian refugees in the region, situation in 2020 stand at $189.9 million. As of 25 including pressure on the health and sanitation August 2020, $19 million has been received. systems in remote areas of countries of asylum. Flexible and country-level funds received by Some Burundian refugees have opted for UNHCR have allowed the organization to allocate voluntary repatriation, which is ongoing from the an additional $48.5 million to the Burundi United Republic of Tanzania and was initiated situation, raising the current funding level to 36%. BURUNDI recently from Rwanda. UNHCR is not promoting These low funding levels have forced UNHCR’s return but is assisting those refugees who indicate operations in Burundi and in neighbouring they have made an informed choice to repatriate. countries to cut programmes and activities across SITUATION a range of sectors, including voluntary repatriation, water, sanitation and hygiene, education and cash assistance, with cuts A child draws on a blackboard in an outdoor classroom at anticipated to other programmes should further Jugudi primary school school in Nyarugusu refugee camp, funding not be received. Kigoma province, western United Republic of Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 1 28/02/2018 18:48
    CIES 2018 SCHEDULE CONFERENCE VENUES Site maps located in back of program Hilton Reforma Mexico City Fiesta Inn Centro Histórico Museo de Arte Popular CIES 2018 ESSENTIAL INFORMATION QUESTIONS? CIES 2018 ON SOCIAL MEDIA Questions during the conference can be directed to the CIES registration desk on the 4th Floor Foyer of the Hilton Reforma, any Indiana University Conferences staf member, CIES volunteer or Program Committee member, or sent to: [email protected]. @cies_us @cies2018 @cies2018 @cies2018 KEY LOCATIONS* OFFICIAL CONFERENCE HASHTAGS Registration #CIES2018 Hilton Reforma, 4th Floor Foyer #remapping Registration Hours: Saturday, March 24: 1:30 to 7:30 PM #SurNorte Sunday, March 25: 7:30 AM to 7:00 PM #SouthNorth Monday, March 26: 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Tuesday, March 27: 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Wednesday, March 28: 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM Thursday, March 29: 7:00 AM to 1:00 PM EXPERIENCE MEXICO CITY Sociedad Mexicana de Educación Comparada (SOMEC) Registration (Mexican Attendees only) Hilton Reforma, 4th Floor Foyer Book Launches, Round-Tables, and Poster Exhibits Hilton Reforma, 4th Floor, Don Alberto 4 CIES Of ce of the Executive Director Grupo Destinos Travel Agency Hilton Reforma, 4th Floor Foyer Hilton Reforma, 4th Floor Foyer University of Chicago Press Hilton Reforma, 4th Floor Foyer Exhibitors Hall Hilton Reforma, 2nd Floor Foyer Exhibit Set-Up Hours: Secretaría de Turismo de la CDMX Monday, March 26: 7:00 AM to 9:30 AM Hilton Reforma, 4th Floor Foyer Exhibit Hours: Monday, March 26: 9:30 AM to 5:00 PM Tuesday, March 27: 9:30 AM to 6:30 PM Wednesday, March 28: 9:30 AM to 6:30 PM Thursday, March 29: 9:30 AM to 5:00 PM Secretaría de Cultura de la CDMX Exhibit Dismantle Hours: Hilton Reforma, 4th Floor Foyer Thursday, March 29: 5:00 to 7:00 PM HILTON SUITE LOCATIONS *For venue and meeting room maps, please see the inside back cover of the program.
    [Show full text]