DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal 2007 II.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal 2007 II.Indd ARAMAZD ARMENIAN JOURNAL OF NEAR EASTERN STUDIES VOLUME II - 2007 ASSOCIATION FOR NEAR EASTERN AND CAUCASIAN STUDIES YEREVA N 2007 ²ð²Ø²¼¸ غðÒ²ìàð²ðºìºÈÚ²Ü àôêàôØܲêÆðàôÂÚàôÜܺðÆ Ð²ÚÎ²Î²Ü Ð²Ü¸ºê вîàð II - 2007 ²è²æ²ìàð²êÆ²Î²Ü ºì ÎàìβêÚ²Ü Ðºî²¼àîàôÂÚàôÜܺðÆ ²êàòƲòƲ ºðºì²Ü 2007 Association for Near Eastern and Caucasian Studies In cooperation with the Institute of Oriental Studies and the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (National Academy of Sciences of Armenia) ARAMAZD ARMENIAN JOURNAL OF NEAR EASTERN STUDIES (AJNES) Editor-in-Chief: Aram Kosyan Vice-Editor: Armen Petrosyan Associate Editors: Tork Dalalyan, Arsen Bobokhyan Assistant Editor: Yervand Grekyan Advisory Board: Gregory Areshian, Pavel Avetisyan, Raffaele Biscione, Andrew George, John Greppin, Hrach Martirosyan, Mirjo Salvini, Ursula Seidl, Adam Smith, Aram Topchyan, Vardan Voskanyan Communications for the editors, manuscripts, and books for review should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief or Assistant Editor of ARAMAZD: Armenian Journal of Near-Eastern Studies. Editorial Office: Marshal Baghramyan Ave. 24g, 375019, Yerevan, Armenia Tel. (374 10) 58 33 82 Fax: (374 10) 52 50 91 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] http://www.ancs.am ISSN 1829-1376 © 2007 by Association for Near Eastern and Caucasian Studies, Yerevan. All rights reserved. Reprinted 2017 Subscriptions to Aramazd shouldshould bebe sentsent toto Archaeopress Publishing Ltd, Gordon House, 276 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7ED, UK Tel +44-(0)1865-311914 Fax +44(0)1865-512231 e-maile-mail [email protected]@archaeopress.com http://www.archaeopress.com All back volumes are available formfrom Archaeopress website TABLE OF CONTENTS _____________________ ARTICLES Mariya Ivanova. The Chronology of the “Maikop Culture” in the North Caucasus: Changing Perspectives ............................................................................................................................ 7-39 MehMet IşIklI. A Collection of Kura-Araxes Pottery from Kars Museum .................................... 40-51 JOHN Cherry, Sturt MANNING, SUSAN ALCOCK, ARMEN Tonikyan, Mkrtich Zardaryan. Radiocarbon Dates for the Second and First Millennia B.C. from Southern Armenia: Preliminary Results from the Vorotan Project, 2005-2006 ........................... 52-71 IRENA Kalantaryan. The Principal Forms and Characteristics of Burial Constructions in Early Bronze Age Armenia ............................................................................. 72-84 JAAN PUHVEL. Reed and Arrow in Anatolia and Beyond ................................................................. 85-87 HRACH Martirosyan. Mediterranean-Pontic Substratum Words in Armenian ........................ 88-123 ANNE-MARIA WITTKE. Das Land Mušku ................................................................................... 124-136 URSULA SEIDL. Wer gründete Rusaḫinili/Toprakkale? ................................................................. 137-145 MIRJO Salvini. Argišti, Rusa, Erimena, Rusa und die Löwenschwänze: Eine urartäische Palastgeschichte des VII. Jh. v. Chr. ..................................................................... 146-162 David STRONACH. The Campaign of Cyrus the Great in 547 BC. A Hitherto Unrecognized Source for the Early History of Armenia? ............................................... 163-173 ARMEN Petrosyan. State Pantheon of Greater Armenia: Earliest Sources ............................. 174-201 BOOK REVIEWS ANNE-MARIA WITTKE, Mušker und Phryger (Aram Kosyan) .................................................... 202-206 PERSONALIA HRACH Bartikyan (Azat Bozoyan) .......................................................................................... 207-211 JOHN GREPPIN (Aram Kosyan) ..................................................................................................... 212-217 ARAM Kalantaryan (Husik Melkonyan) ............................................................................... 218-219 IN MEMORIAM EMMA Khanzadyan (Arsen Bobokhyan) ................................................................................. 220-225 SUMMARIES ................................................................................................................................. 226-237 ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 238-239.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff
    The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff This study appears as part III of Toumanoff's Studies in Christian Caucasian History (Georgetown, 1963), pp. 277-354. An earlier version appeared in the journal Le Muséon 72(1959), pp. 1-36 and 73(1960), pp. 73-106. The Orontids of Armenia Bibliography, pp. 501-523 Maps appear as an attachment to the present document. This material is presented solely for non-commercial educational/research purposes. I 1. The genesis of the Armenian nation has been examined in an earlier Study.1 Its nucleus, succeeding to the role of the Yannic nucleus ot Urartu, was the 'proto-Armenian,T Hayasa-Phrygian, people-state,2 which at first oc- cupied only a small section of the former Urartian, or subsequent Armenian, territory. And it was, precisely, of the expansion of this people-state over that territory, and of its blending with the remaining Urartians and other proto- Caucasians that the Armenian nation was born. That expansion proceeded from the earliest proto-Armenian settlement in the basin of the Arsanias (East- ern Euphrates) up the Euphrates, to the valley of the upper Tigris, and espe- cially to that of the Araxes, which is the central Armenian plain.3 This expand- ing proto-Armenian nucleus formed a separate satrapy in the Iranian empire, while the rest of the inhabitants of the Armenian Plateau, both the remaining Urartians and other proto-Caucasians, were included in several other satrapies.* Between Herodotus's day and the year 401, when the Ten Thousand passed through it, the land of the proto-Armenians had become so enlarged as to form, in addition to the Satrapy of Armenia, also the trans-Euphratensian vice-Sa- trapy of West Armenia.5 This division subsisted in the Hellenistic phase, as that between Greater Armenia and Lesser Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet of Armenia, 1920
    Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 MUNUC 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ Letter from the Crisis Director…………………………………………………3 Letter from the Chair………………………………………….………………..4 The History of Armenia…………………………………………………………6 The Geography of Armenia…………………………………………………14 Current Situation………………………………………………………………17 Character Biographies……………………………………………………....27 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………...37 2 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 LETTER FROM THE CRISIS DIRECTOR ______________________________________________________ Dear Delegates, We’re very happy to welcome you to MUNUC XXXII! My name is Andre Altherr and I’ll be your Crisis Director for the Cabinet of Armenia: 1920 committee. I’m from New York City and am currently a Second Year at the University of Chicago majoring in History and Political Science. Despite once having a social life, I now spend my free-time on much tamer activities like reading 800-page books on Armenian history, reading 900-page books on Central European history, and relaxing with the best of Stephen King and 20th century sci-fi anthologies. When not reading, I enjoy hiking, watching Frasier, and trying to catch up on much needed sleep. I’ve helped run and participated in numerous Model UN conferences in both college and high school, and I believe that this activity has the potential to hone public speaking, develop your creativity and critical thinking, and ignite interest in new fields. Devin and I care very deeply about making this committee an inclusive space in which all of you feel safe, comfortable, and motivated to challenge yourself to grow as a delegate, statesperson, and human. We trust that you will conduct yourselves with maturity and tact when discussing sensitive subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview on Karabakh History from Past to Today
    Volume: 8 Issue: 2 Year: 2011 A Brief Overview on Karabakh History from Past to Today Ercan Karakoç Abstract After initiation of the glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring) policies in the USSR by Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet Union started to crumble, and old, forgotten, suppressed problems especially regarding territorial claims between Azerbaijanis and Armenians reemerged. Although Mountainous (Nagorno) Karabakh is officially part of Azerbaijan Republic, after fierce and bloody clashes between Armenians and Azerbaijanis, the entire Nagorno Karabakh region and seven additional surrounding districts of Lachin, Kelbajar, Agdam, Jabrail, Fizuli, Khubadly and Zengilan, it means over 20 per cent of Azerbaijan, were occupied by Armenians, and because of serious war situations, many Azerbaijanis living in these areas had to migrate from their homeland to Azerbaijan and they have been living under miserable conditions since the early 1990s. Keywords: Karabakh, Caucasia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Ottoman Empire, Safavid Empire, Russia and Soviet Union Assistant Professor of Modern Turkish History, Yıldız Technical University, [email protected] 1003 Karakoç, E. (2011). A Brief Overview on Karabakh History from Past to Today. International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 8:2. Available: http://www.insanbilimleri.com/en Geçmişten günümüze Karabağ tarihi üzerine bir değerlendirme Ercan Karakoç Özet Mihail Gorbaçov tarafından başlatılan glasnost (açıklık) ve perestroyka (yeniden inşa) politikalarından sonra Sovyetler Birliği parçalanma sürecine girdi ve birlik coğrafyasındaki unutulmuş ve bastırılmış olan eski problemler, özellikle Azerbaycan Türkleri ve Ermeniler arasındaki sınır sorunları yeniden gün yüzüne çıktı. Bu bağlamda, hukuken Azerbaycan devletinin bir parçası olan Dağlık Karabağ bölgesi ve çevresindeki Laçin, Kelbecer, Cebrail, Agdam, Fizuli, Zengilan ve Kubatlı gibi yedi semt, yani yaklaşık olarak Azerbaycan‟ın yüzde yirmiye yakın toprağı, her iki toplum arasındaki şiddetli ve kanlı çarpışmalardan sonra Ermeniler tarafından işgal edildi.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMPACT of the ARMENIAN GENOCIDE on the FORMATION of NATIONAL STATEHOOD and POLITICAL IDENTITY “Today Most Armenians Do
    ASHOT ALEKSANYAN THE IMPACT OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ON THE FORMATION OF NATIONAL STATEHOOD AND POLITICAL IDENTITY Key words – Armenian Genocide, pre-genocide, post-genocide, national statehood, Armenian statehood heritage, political identity, civiliarchic elite, civilization, civic culture, Armenian diaspora, Armenian civiliarchy “Today most Armenians do not live in the Republic of Armenia. Indeed, most Armenians have deep ties to the countries where they live. Like a lot of us, many Armenians find themselves balancing their role in their new country with their historical and cultural roots. How far should they assimilate into their new countries? Does Armenian history and culture have something to offer Armenians as they live their lives now? When do historical and cultural memories create self-imposed limits on individuals?”1 Introduction The relevance of this article is determined, on the one hand, the multidimen- sionality of issues related to understanding the role of statehood and the political and legal system in the development of Armenian civilization, civic culture and identity, on the other hand - the negative impact of the long absence of national system of public administration and the devastating impact of the Armenian Genocide of 1915 on the further development of the Armenian statehood and civiliarchy. Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Turkey was the first ever large-scale crime against humanity and human values. Taking advantage of the beginning of World War I, the Turkish authorities have organized mass murder and deportations of Armenians from their historic homeland. Genocide divided the civiliarchy of the Armenian people in three parts: before the genocide (pre-genocide), during the genocide and after the genocide (post-genocide).
    [Show full text]
  • AN ARMENIAN MEDITERRANEAN Words and Worlds in Motion CHAPTER 5
    EDITED BY KATHRYN BABAYAN AND MICHAEL PIFER AN ARMENIAN MEDITERRANEAN Words and Worlds in Motion CHAPTER 5 From “Autonomous” to “Interactive” Histories: World History’s Challenge to Armenian Studies Sebouh David Aslanian In recent decades, world historians have moved away from more conventional studies of nations and national states to examine the role of transregional networks in facilitating hemispheric interactions and connectedness between This chapter was mostly written in the summer of 2009 and 2010 and episodically revised over the past few years. Earlier iterations were presented at Armenian Studies workshops at the University of California, Los Angeles in 2009, and the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 2012 and 2015. I am grateful to the conveners of the workshops for the invitation and feedback. I would also like to thank especially Houri Berberian, Jirair Libaridian, David Myers, Stephen H. Rapp, Khachig Tölölyan, Sanjay Subrahmanyam, Sarah Abrevaya Stein, Kathryn Babayan, Richard Antaramian, Giusto Traina, and Marc Mamigonian for their generous comments. As usual, I alone am responsible for any shortcomings. S. D. Aslanian (*) University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA © The Author(s) 2018 81 K. Babayan, M. Pifer (eds.), An Armenian Mediterranean, Mediterranean Perspectives, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72865-0_5 82 S. D. ASLANIAN cultures and regions.1 This shift from what may be called the optic of the nation(-state) to a global optic has enabled historians to examine large- scale historical processes
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Memorializing: Analyzing Armenian Genocide Memorials and Commemorations in the Republic of Armenia and in the Diaspora
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR HISTORY, CULTURE AND MODERNITY www.history-culture-modernity.org Published by: Uopen Journals Copyright: © The Author(s). Content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence eISSN: 2213-0624 The Cost of Memorializing: Analyzing Armenian Genocide Memorials and Commemorations in the Republic of Armenia and in the Diaspora Sabrina Papazian HCM 7: 55–86 DOI: 10.18352/hcm.534 Abstract In April of 1965 thousands of Armenians gathered in Yerevan and Los Angeles, demanding global recognition of and remembrance for the Armenian Genocide after fifty years of silence. Since then, over 200 memorials have been built around the world commemorating the vic- tims of the Genocide and have been the centre of hundreds of marches, vigils and commemorative events. This article analyzes the visual forms and semiotic natures of three Armenian Genocide memorials in Armenia, France and the United States and the commemoration prac- tices that surround them to compare and contrast how the Genocide is being memorialized in different Armenian communities. In doing so, this article questions the long-term effects commemorations have on an overall transnational Armenian community. Ultimately, it appears that calls for Armenian Genocide recognition unwittingly categorize the global Armenian community as eternal victims, impeding the develop- ment of both the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian diaspora. Keywords: Armenian Genocide, commemoration, cultural heritage, diaspora, identity, memorials HCM 2019, VOL. 7 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/202155 12:33:22PM via free access PAPAZIAN Introduction On 24 April 2015, the hundredth anniversary of the commencement of the Armenian Genocide, Armenians around the world collectively mourned for and remembered their ancestors who had lost their lives in the massacres and deportations of 1915.1 These commemorations took place in many forms, including marches, candlelight vigils, ceremo- nial speeches and cultural performances.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Azerbaijan: Deconstructing the “Age-Old Friendship” and the “Deadly Feud” Myths 20
    THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND TURKEY: HISTORY LESSONS OF THE 20TH CENTURY 2012 The South Caucasus and Turkey: History Lessons of the 20th Century Publisher: Heinrich Böll Foundation South Caucasus Regional Office Editor in Chief: Sergey Rumyantsev © Heinrich Böll Foundation South Caucasus Regional Office, 2012a 38, Zovreti st., Tbilisi 0160, Georgia T +995 32 238 04 67/68, +995 32 291 37 39 | F +995 32 291 28 97 E [email protected] | W www.ge.boell.org | F www.facebook.com/hbf.caucasus ISBN 978-9941-0-4390-1 CONTENTS Nino Lejava, Khatuna Samnidze From the Publisher 7 Sergey Rumyantsev Introduction. “History Lessons” in the Year of “Anniversary” 9 PART 1. BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY: “RECENT” PAST 19 Ilham Abbasov The History of Azerbaijan: Deconstructing the “Age-Old Friendship” and the “Deadly Feud” Myths 20 Satenik Mkrtchyan The Republic of Armenia’s Neighbours in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries in Contemporary World History Textbooks 47 Nino Chikovani The Images of Self and Neighbours in Georgian History Textbooks: Representation of the Events of the Beginning of the 20th Century in the Post-Soviet Period 65 Çakır Ceyhan Suvari Religious Identity and the Construction of Otherness: The Perception of Armenian Identity in The Turkish Educational System 94 PART 2. THE END OF THE 20TH CENTURY: SEARCHING FOR NEW INTERPRETATIONS 119 Sevil Huseynova Azerbaijan in the Late 20th – Early 21st Centuries: Ethnic Boundaries in the Context of Relations with “Neighbours” 120 Mikayel Zolyan Writing the History of the Present: The Post-Soviet Period
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Mt. Ararat: Two Identifications
    68 Armen Petrosyan: Biblical Mt. Ararat: Two Identifications Biblical Mt. Ararat: Two Identifications ARMEN PETROSYAN Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Yerevan, Armenia Abstract: The biblical Ararat, mountain of landing of Noah’s Ark has two general identifications in the Armenian Highland: Mountain of Corduena (modern Cudi dağı) and Masis (Ararat, Ağrı dağı), situated respectively in the extreme south-east and extreme north- east of modern Turkey). The ancient sources actualized the first localization. Since the 12th century the second became more and more popular. The paper deals with the myths and legends associated with those mountains and the history of identification of the biblical Ararat. Ararat, the mountain of the landing of Noah’s Ark, has been identified in various locations, but up until now two main candidates persist: the mountain of Corduena and Masis. In the Hebrew Bible (Masoretic text) the mountains are called 'Arārāṭ, in the Greek translation (Septuagint) – Ararat, in Chaldean and Syrian (Peshitta) – Qardū, in Arabic – Qarda, and in Latin – “Mountains of Armenia”. Ararat is believed to be the Greek version of Hebrew 'RRṬ, i.e. Urartu (Piotrovsky 1944: 29; 1969: 13; Inglizian 1947: 5 ff., 63 ff; Musheghyan 2003: 4 ff.: Salvini and Salvini 2003; Marinković 2012). On the other hand, Ararat is almost identical to the Armenian term Ayrarat – the name of the central province of Armenia, with Mt. Masis at its center. However, Urartu and Ayrarat are two different geographical concepts. Ayrarat is the Armenian name of the region, which in Urartian sources is referred to as the land of Etiuni or Etiuhi (in the north of Urartu).
    [Show full text]
  • A Military History of the Armenian People and the Armed Forces
    ¸ñ. ¾¹ ´³Õ¹³ë³ñ»³Ý ( ñÙ³ÝÇÏ«¶.¹¾ ) نگاهی به نژادکشی ارمنیان و ²ÏݳñÏ Ð³Ûáó ò»Õ³ëå³Ýáõû³Ý محاکمه طلعت پاشا êáÕáÙáÝ Â»ÑÉÇñ»³ÝÇ یا ¸³ï³í³ñáõÃÇõÝÁ Armenian Genocide دادگاه سوغومون تهلیریان Trial of Soghomon Tehlirian ترجمه ، تالیف ، سخن آغاز و پیشگفتار By: Ed. Baghdasarian دکترادیک باغداساریان .Ed. Germanic) Ph.D) )ا. گرمانیک(( Ottawa-Canada 2005 اتاوا – کانادا 4831 A R Edic Baghdasarian (Ed. Germanic) M E N I Էդիկ Բաղդասարյան A N Հայոց զինյալ պայքարը և հայկական բանակը A պատմության ընթացքում R (Սկզբից մինչև մեր օրերը) M Monument dedicated to the Battle of Sardarapat, Armenia Մեկ հատորով Y (Անգլերեն) A Military History of the Armenian People and the Armed Forces From Old Times to Present Days (in Armenian) One-Volume Edition Summary of Three-Volume Set Toronto-Canada One Edic Baghdasarian 2019 Էդիկ Բաղդասարյան Volume www.Edic-Baghdasarian.com Armenian Research Center Edition ISBN: 978-1-927860-65-6 Edic Baghdasarian 1 Military History of Armenia Edic Baghdasarian (Ed. Germanic) A Military History of the Armenian People and the Armed Forces From Old Times to Present Days In One Volume Toronto-Canada ISBN: 978-1-927860-65-6 Edic Baghdasarian 2019 Էդիկ Բաղդասարյան www.Edic-Baghdasarian.com Edic Baghdasarian 3 Military History of Armenia The Author dedecates this book to the glorious memory of the heroes of the Armenian armed forces fallen during the four-day battle of April 2016 Kyaram Sloyan Armeniak Urfanian Karen Nersisian Sasun Mkrdchian Edic Baghdasarian 5 Military History of Armenia Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. 5 Preface ............................................................................................................................... 9 A brief history of Armenia and military struggle for existence ................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mushki Problem Reconsidered
    THE MUSHKI PROBLEM RECONSIDERED by ARAM V. KOSSIAN Introduction For a long time the appearance of the Indo-European element of the Armenian people was regarded as a consequence of a certain wave of Indo­ European migrations from their original homeland, either in the XII B.C. or l much later . The western route of migration from the Balkanic area still dominates since the current view on this problem states the following: 1) The Armenian language shows close relationship to the Balkanic Indo-European languages (i.e., Thracian and Phrygian). 2) The Armenians are not attested to in the Armenian Highland or in adjacent areas neither in the Hittite, nor in Assyrian historical records. 3) The Early Transcaucasian Culture (IV-Ill mill. B.C.) was plausibly non-Indo-European. Before discussing the probability of the Armenian migration(s) some remarks on these arguments will be useful. The first argument seems quite dubious because of an extremely small number of linguistic data which could be ascribed to the Thracians and 2 Phrygians • That the Armenian-speaking tribes could have been remained unrecorded in the contemporary cuneiform texts is not as strange as it may seem. One can hardly believe that it is possible to identify any known linguistic/ethnic group by the restricted number of anthroponyms, theonyms, and toponyms which have appeared in XV-XIII B.c. texts. This holds true for the Hayasaean data which shows some Anatolian and Hurrian influence, but could not be treated as being neither Anatolian, nor Hurrian J • I See footnote 5 below. 2 Diakonoff and Neroznak, 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Fears and Ethnic War in Karabagh
    Ethnic Fears and Ethnic War In Karabagh Stuart J. Kaufman University of Kentucky October 1998 The ethnic conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis over the region of Nagorno-Karabagh first exploded into violence—or at least, into the newspapers—with the Sumgait pogroms of 1988, during which hundreds of Christian Armenians were killed or injured at the hands of mobs of Muslim Azerbaijanis. The conflict placed the “nationality question” back near the top of the Soviet Union’s political agenda, and it can be seen in retrospect as the death knell of the Soviet Union itself, representing the first indication of the capacity of nationalist conflicts inside the USSR to undermine Soviet rule. It also developed into the bloodiest and most destructive of the ethnic wars in the Gorbachev years, producing by one estimate some 10,000 dead after 5 years of conflict, and over 1 million refugees on the Azerbaijani side alone. 1 The Karabagh conflict therefore bears studying as an important episode in its own right. It also bears studying as a case study in the theory of ethnic or nationalist conflict. Mark Saroyan, one of the most talented students of the Transcaucasus and its turmoil, posed the question of interpretation this way: “The Armenian Protests: Is it Passion or Politics?” Though Saroyan’s polemic was aimed primarily at journalists, it was reprinted for a scholarly audience because most scholars agreed with the question, the majority also agreeing with Saroyan’s answer that the conflict—and many others like it—was driven not by “deep-seated and seemingly immutable hostility,” but rather by a rational drive to achieve ordinary political goals: “a rational response to contemporary institutional constraints.”2 1 Suzanne Goldenberg, Pride of Small Nations: The Caucasus and Post-Soviet Disorder (London: Zed Books, 1994), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Identity Conflicts and Its Implications for Conflict Management
    UNISCI Discussion Papers ISSN: 1696-2206 [email protected] Universidad Complutense de Madrid España Gahramanova, Aytan Identity Conflicts and its Implications for Conflict Management UNISCI Discussion Papers, núm. 11, mayo, 2006, pp. 153-186 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76701115 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative UNISCI DISCUSSION PAPERS Nº 11 (Mayo / May 2006) IDENTITY CONFLICTS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT 1 AUTHOR: AYTAN GAHRAMANOVA Mannheim University Introduction Ethnic conflicts with territorial dimensions expressed in secessionism have been important causes of contemporary conflict in the 1990s in the post Communist area and pose a major challenge to conflict management. Real or perceived inequalities and fears turn ethnicity into a political instrument for channeling ethnic based interests and needs. Three major factors can be identified as influencing the wave of contemporary ethnic conflicts. First, the trend towards ‘democratization’ in previously authoritarian countries has given more opportunities for ethnic minorities to freely assert their perceived group rights. Second, there is increasing international concern for minority rights, which seems in some cases to override concerns on sovereignty. Third, there is a legal gap left for the voluntary interpretation of the content and holders of self-determination rights. In reality, such a situation can create a ‘legal license’ for violent ethnic conflict, with ethnic cleansing and human rights violations as the main attributes of the secessionist movement.
    [Show full text]