DOCSLIB.ORG

An Introduction to Orbital Sciences Corporation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 Orbital Space Launch & The Changing Landscape of Commercial Space May 2012 John Steinmeyer © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 1 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 st Alan Shepard – 1 American In Space Mercury Redstone Rocket Launch - May 5, 1961 Freedom 7 Mission 15-minute Suborbital Flight Altitude of 116 statute miles (187 km) Splashdown point 302 statute miles (486 km) down range in Atlantic Ocean Also Later Became Apollo 14 Commander and the 5th Person to Walk on the Moon © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 2 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 Yuri Gagarin – 1st Man in Space Vostok-3KA (Vostok 1) launch, April 12, 1961 Mission Duration – 108 minutes One Orbit Sergey Korolyov General Designer © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 3 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 America’s Achievements In Space Developed a Series of Higher Performing Launch Vehicles, Culminating in Saturn V, the Most Powerful Rocket Ever Produced Executed a Well Planed Series of Missions Concurrent with Launch Vehicle Development Which Enabled Manned Expeditions to the Moon Developed Manned Orbiting Laboratories, First Skylab and Then, Though Collaboration, the International Space Station Developed a Partially Reusable Launch System to Support Station Development and Habitation Which Made 135 Flights with a 98.5% Success Record Developed a Series of Expendable Launch Vehicles to Support Deployment of USAF and National Security Systems An Extensive Series of Robotic and Exploratory Missions to Better Understand our Planet, Our Solar System, our Galaxy, and Universe By Extension, Supported Unprecedented Technological Development in Information Systems, Electronics, Life Support and Countless Other Areas, and Stimulated Technology Education © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 4 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 The “Present” Still Only Two Countries in the World with the Capability of Launching Humans into Space – But the U.S. Is Not One of Them Or – Perhaps More Accurately, the U.S. Currently pays Russia for this Capability NASA has Finally Announced Plans for a New Exploration-Class Vehicle but it is at Best Six to Seven Years Away – Even if Its Development Can Survive Political and Economic Turmoil NASA Science Missions, While Boasting Significant Recent Accomplishments, Are Now Being Severely Curtailed Just When We Are Beginning to “Know What We Didn’t Know” The U.S. Still Retains An Impressive Set of Vehicles for Military Applications, and Retains Dominance in Military Space, But the Cost of These Systems is Unsustainable, and Large, Monolithic Spacecraft are Now Vulnerable Targets Despite the Voracious Consumption of and Reliance on Bandwidth, the Vast Majority of Commercial Launches are Contracted with Foreign Commercial Companies How Did We Get Here and Where are We Going? © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 5 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 Changing Priorities In Space Development Simultaneous US Investment in Apollo, ICBMs and SLBMs in 1960s and 70s Large Government Spending as % of Budget – “Vital Importance” Robust US Industrial Base Establishment of U.S. as Predominate Space Power Both Manned and Un-Manned Waning Investment and National Interest in 80’s and 90’s Reduced Government Spending as % of Budget – “Priority” NASA Budget < 1% of Federal Budget Consolidation of Industrial Base Advent of “Commercial Space” market “Evaporation” of Investment and National Interest in 2000s Extremely Limited Government Investment in Technology Deployment Lack of Clear Direction Anemic Industrial Base; Loss of Skilled Personnel Significant Increases in Cost “The U.S. is at a Crossroads and Facing An Uncertain Future Unlike any We Have Seen in Decades” - Jim Maser, President, PWR to Committee on Science, Space & Technology , 3/2011 © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 6 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 The Changing Landscape of Commercial Space While U.S. Interest in Space has Continued to Decline, It’s Relative Importance and Necessity for Everyday Life has Increased Military – Drones, Surveillance, Secure Communications, Troop Correspondence, etc Commercial – Telcom, GPS, Satellite TV, Google Maps, Zillow, VSAT transactions, etc. Many New Markets In Commercial Space COTS/CRS, CCDev,Tourism, Exploration, Mining, Etc. Many New Entrants into Emerging Commercial Space Launch Industry NASA Now Realizes that They Must Partner with Industry Private Industry Must Now Take the Lead for Major Space Development Programs Space Exploration Must Become a Cooperative, International Endeavor © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 7 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 What is “Commercial Space”? Private and Publicly Traded Companies Supported American Space Development Activities (Boeing, McDonnell Douglas, Martin, Lockheed, Grumman, etc.) First Commercial Spacecraft – Telstar 1 – Launched July 10, 1962 (Government Funded) First Commercial Launch Company – Arianespace – 1980 First “Entrepreneurial” Commercial Space Company – Orbital Sciences Corp. – 1982 Transfer Orbit Stage (TOS) for Shuttle Bay Satellite Deployments First U.S. Commercial Launch – Delta II BSB-R1 satellite launch Aug 27, 1989 First Privately-Funded Space Launch Vehicle –Pegasus – Orbital Sciences Corp. -1990 First Strictly Commercial Launch Company – Sea Launch, Formed April 1995 First Launch March 27, 1999 First Privately Financed, New Development Space Company – Space Exploration Technologies (Space X) - 2002 © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 8 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 NASA’s Commercial Programs Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) Demonstration of Orbital Transportation Services from Commercial Providers. Contracts Initially Awarded 8/2006 to Two Companies – Space X and Kistler (RpK) Kistler Contract Canceled Based on In-ability to Meet Contract Milestones Re-competed and Awarded to Orbital 2/2008 Commercial Re-Supply Service (CRS) Programs Contracts Based Upon Total Cargo to Station Fixed-price, Milestone Based Payments Contracts Awarded to Orbital (8 Missions) and Space X (12 Missions) Commercial Crew Development Program (CCDev) Manned Launch to Space Station Phased Contracts Awarded to Multiple Companies Boeing, Space X, Blue Origin, Sierra Nevada Funding Also Provided to ULA for Atlas V Man Rating © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 9 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 Orbital Overview Leading Developer and Manufacturer of Small- and Medium-Class Space Systems 30-Year Record of Reliable, Rapid and Affordable Development and Production Serving Customers in Commercial, National Security and Civil Government Markets Over 1,000 Satellites and Launch Vehicles Built or Under Contract for Customers 205 Satellites and Space Systems 165 Space and Strategic Launch Vehicles 635 Target Vehicles and Sounding Rockets 3,800 Employees and 1.7 Million Square Feet of State-of-the-Art Facilities Revenues of About $1.5 Billion Expected in 2012 Contract Backlog Totals $5.2 Billion for Delivery Through 2018 Conservative Balance Sheet With Strong Liquidity © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 10 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 Well-Balanced Business Segments Launch Vehicles Satellites and Space Systems Advanced Space Programs 38% 32% 30% 2012 Revenues ~$1.5 Billion Overview - Apr2012-r1 11 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 Over 735 Space Missions Since 1982* 71 Commercial Satellites 67 Government Satellites 40 Space Payloads 70 Space Launch Vehicles 186 Interceptor & Target Vehicles 303 Sounding Rockets *April 1982-March 2012 12 Overview - Apr2012-r1 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 State-of-the-Art R&D and Production Facilities Dulles, Virginia Chandler, Arizona • Headquarters and Satellite Development and Production • Launch Vehicle Development and Production • 1,800 Employees • 1,300 Employees Gilbert, Arizona Greenbelt, Maryland • Satellite Development and Production • Space Technical Services • 300 Employees • 400 Employees Overview - Apr2012-r1 13 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 High-Caliber Engineering-Centric Workforce Program Managers Designers General Managers, System Marketing Managers Engineers Other 6% 5% Engineers 3% (GN&C, RF/ Business 15% Support Optical, Aero, 16% Specialists 22% Mission Ops) 50% Technical Staff 24% 10% 25% Software Mechanical Engineers/ 24% Engineers Scientists Manufacturing/Test/ Engineers QA Specialists Electrical Engineers 3,800 Employees* 1,885 Engineers/Scientists* *As of April 1, 2012 Overview - Apr2012-r1 14 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 Two Decades…12 Space and Strategic Launch Vehicles BUILDING ON A HERITAGE OF SUCCESS • Orbital has Successfully Developed More Launch Vehicles During the Last 20 Years Than Any Other Organization • Antares is Being Developed, Manufactured and Launched Using Proven Management Approaches, Engineering Standards, and Manufacturing and Test Processes Common to Orbital’s Other Major Launch Vehicles © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 15 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 Orbital’s Major Launch Vehicle Programs Pegasus XL Minotaur I Minotaur II Antares Minotaur IV 12 Different Space and Strategic Minotaur V Launch Vehicles Developed Over 70 Space Missions Taurus XL Launched Over the Last 20 Years © 2012 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 16 8-LSG-Generic No License-0044 Minotaur 100% Mission Success over 23 Launches More
Recommended publications
  • Robenschain GSFC July 2012

    Robenschain GSFC July 2012

    Goddard Space Flight Center NASA Goddard Space Flight Center • NASA’s first Space Flight Center (established 1959) • We TRANSFORM Human Understanding of Earth and Space • Largest Collection of Scientists & Engineers in the U.S. • Nearly 300 successful missions including the World’s First Weather Satellite and the Hubble Space Telescope • 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics [Big Bang/Cosmic Background] • Hubble Supported 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics • WMAP Team Awarded 2012 Gruber Prize for Cosmology 2 Our Facilities • GSFC Greenbelt, Maryland • GSFC Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia • IV&V Facility, West Virginia • Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York Wallops Flight Facility • Ground Stations at White Sands Complex, New Mexico White Sands Complex Greenbelt Goddard Institute for Independent Verification and Space Studies Validation Facility 3 Our Lines of Business Cross Cutting Earth Science Technology and Capabilities Suborbital Platforms Astrophysics Planetary & Lunar Human Exploration Science & Operations Communications && Navigation GSFC’s Contributions to a Diverse Mission Portfolio QuikSCAT dinW dinW Voyager O-E1 O-E1 teoSer teoSer SBRE SBRE ACRIMSAT RHESSI TSOM TSOM TMMR TMMR Geotail OOHS OOHS aquA aquA ICESat DETMI DETMI SAMPEX Landsat 7 TRACE THEMIS TOPEX CALIPSO Tarer Tarer ECA ECA GRACE SORCE Cluster SOEP SOEP ODS ODS GEAMI GEAMI MIA MIA aruA aruA TSFA TSFA SGOE SGOE oPlar oPlar MGP MGP SMM SMM Solar-B XEBI XEBI PPN PPN Aquarius CloudSat TDRSS LMCD LMCD Osiris-Rex (Sample Return) PSBR PSBR PAMW PAMW TWINS Cassini (Instrument)
  • Launch and Deployment Analysis for a Small, MEO, Technology Demonstration Satellite

    Launch and Deployment Analysis for a Small, MEO, Technology Demonstration Satellite

    46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit AIAA 2008-1131 7 – 10 January 20006, Reno, Nevada Launch and Deployment Analysis for a Small, MEO, Technology Demonstration Satellite Stephen A. Whitmore* and Tyson K. Smith† Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322-4130 A trade study investigating the economics, mass budget, and concept of operations for delivery of a small technology-demonstration satellite to a medium-altitude earth orbit is presented. The mission requires payload deployment at a 19,000 km orbit altitude and an inclination of 55o. Because the payload is a technology demonstrator and not part of an operational mission, launch and deployment costs are a paramount consideration. The payload includes classified technologies; consequently a USA licensed launch system is mandated. A preliminary trade analysis is performed where all available options for FAA-licensed US launch systems are considered. The preliminary trade study selects the Orbital Sciences Minotaur V launch vehicle, derived from the decommissioned Peacekeeper missile system, as the most favorable option for payload delivery. To meet mission objectives the Minotaur V configuration is modified, replacing the baseline 5th stage ATK-37FM motor with the significantly smaller ATK Star 27. The proposed design change enables payload delivery to the required orbit without using a 6th stage kick motor. End-to-end mass budgets are calculated, and a concept of operations is presented. Monte-Carlo simulations are used to characterize the expected accuracy of the final orbit.
  • Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch

    Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch

    The Space Congress® Proceedings 2019 (46th) Light the Fire Jun 4th, 3:30 PM Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch Thomas Ste. Marie Vice Commander, 45th Space Wing Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Ste. Marie, Thomas, "Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch" (2019). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 31. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-2019-46th/presentations/31 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch Colonel Thomas Ste. Marie Vice Commander, 45th Space Wing CCAFS Launch Customers: 2013 Complex 41: ULA Atlas V (CST-100) Complex 40: SpaceX Falcon 9 Complex 37: ULA Delta IV; Delta IV Heavy Complex 46: Space Florida, Navy* Skid Strip: NGIS Pegasus Atlantic Ocean: Navy Trident II* Black text – current programs; Blue text – in work; * – sub-orbital CCAFS Launch Customers: 2013 Complex 39B: NASA SLS Complex 41: ULA Atlas V (CST-100) Complex 40: SpaceX Falcon 9 Complex 37: ULA Delta IV; Delta IV Heavy NASA Space Launch System Launch Complex 39B February 4, 2013 Complex 46: Space Florida, Navy* Skid Strip: NGIS Pegasus Atlantic Ocean: Navy Trident II* Black text – current programs;
  • Small Space Launch: Origins & Challenges Lt Col Thomas H

    Small Space Launch: Origins & Challenges Lt Col Thomas H

    Small Space Launch: Origins & Challenges Lt Col Thomas H. Freeman, USAF, [email protected], (505)853-4750 Maj Jose Delarosa, USAF, [email protected], (505)846-4097 Launch Test Squadron, SMC/SDTW Small Space Launch: Origins The United States Space Situational Awareness capability continues to be a key element in obtaining and maintaining the high ground in space. Space Situational Awareness satellites are critical enablers for integrated air, ground and sea operations, and play an essential role in fighting and winning conflicts. The United States leads the world space community in spacecraft payload systems from the component level into spacecraft, and in the development of constellations of spacecraft. The United States’ position is founded upon continued government investment in research and development in space technology [1], which is clearly reflected in the Space Situational Awareness capabilities and the longevity of these missions. In the area of launch systems that support Space Situational Awareness, despite the recent development of small launch vehicles, the United States launch capability is dominated by an old, unresponsive and relatively expensive set of launchers [1] in the Expandable, Expendable Launch Vehicles (EELV) platforms; Delta IV and Atlas V. The EELV systems require an average of six to eight months from positioning on the launch table until liftoff [3]. Access to space requires maintaining a robust space transportation capability, founded on a rigorous industrial and technology base. The downturn of commercial space launch service use has undermined, for the time being, the ability of industry to recoup its significant investment in current launch systems.
  • Review of Nasa's Acquisition of Commercial Launch Services

    Review of Nasa's Acquisition of Commercial Launch Services

    FEBRUARY 17, 2011 AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF AUDITS REVIEW OF NASA’S ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL LAUNCH SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL National Aeronautics and Space Administration REPORT NO. IG-11-012 (ASSIGNMENT NO. A-09-011-00) Final report released by: Paul K. Martin Inspector General Acronyms COTS Commercial Orbital Transportation Services CRS Commercial Resupply Services DOD Department of Defense EELV Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle ELV Expendable Launch Vehicle ESMD Exploration Systems Mission Directorate GAO Government Accountability Office GLAST Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope IBEX Interstellar Boundary Explorer ICBM Intercontinental Ballistic Missile ICESat-II Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite IDIQ Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity ISS International Space Station LADEE Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer LCROSS Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite LRO Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter LSP Launch Services Program NLS NASA Launch Services OCO Orbiting Carbon Observatory OIG Office of Inspector General PPBE Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution SMAP Soil Moisture Active Passive SMD Science Mission Directorate SOMD Space Operations Mission Directorate ULA United Launch Alliance REPORT NO. IG-11-012 FEBRUARY 17, 2011 OVERVIEW REVIEW OF NASA’S ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL LAUNCH SERVICES The Issue Commercial U.S. launch services providers compete domestically and internationally for contracts to carry satellites and other payloads into orbit using unmanned, single-use vehicles known as expendable launch vehicles (ELVs). However, since the late 1990s the global commercial launch market has generally declined following the downturn in the telecommunications services industry, which was the primary customer of the commercial space industry. Given this trend, U.S. launch services providers struggling to remain economically viable have been bolstered by the Commercial Space Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-303), which requires NASA and other Federal agencies to plan missions and procure space transportation services from U.S.
  • Doing Business with Wallops Flight Facility

    Doing Business with Wallops Flight Facility

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Doing Business with NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) in Virginia provides agile, low-cost flight and launch range ser- vices to meet government and commercial sector needs for accessing flight regimes worldwide from the Earth’s surface to the moon and beyond. As a multi-user facility with operational launch range, spaceport, and airfield assets, Wallops is well-positioned to meet ongoing and emerging needs in the science, aerospace, defense, and commercial industries. WALLOPS RANGE The Wallops Range supports many of the mission activities around WFF and abroad. Project managers utlize the support of range services to provide a broad array of technical and instrumentation services, such as radar, optical tracking, telemetry, meteorological, command and control, surveillance and recovery, financial analysis and engineering services to support scientific research and technology development. WALLOPS MOBILE ASSETS Wallops has semi-permanent downrange instrumentation as well as mobile instrumentation to include radar, telemetry, command/control, and data systems that can be transported to offsite and remote locations. Campaigns have been conducted from the semi-permanent locations in Bermuda and North Carolina, as well as from the Arctic and Antarctic regions, South America, Africa, Europe, Australia and even at sea, with our mobile systems. WFF personnel have extensive experience in planning and conducting downrange support and mobile campaigns, developing equipment and systems to support these operations. Downrange and mobile systems include the following: C-band radar, meteorology, optical tracking, orbital tracking, flight termination, telemetry, timing, surveillance, and recovery. Keith Thompson, Wallops Advanced Projects Office | 757-824-1680 www.nasa.gov/wallops MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL SPACEPORT Virginia’s Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport at Wallops supports two launch facilities, one medium-lift liquid-fueled pad and a medium-lift solid propellant pad.
  • Statement of Policy on Waiving Ground Safety Regulations At

    Statement of Policy on Waiving Ground Safety Regulations At

    Commercial Space Transportation 800 Independence Ave., SW. Washington, DC 20591 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 415, 417, 431, and 435 Statement of Policy on Waiving Ground Safety Regulations at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Vandenberg Air Force Base, Wallops Flight Facility, and Kennedy Space Center. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT ACTION: Policy Statement SUMMARY: This action establishes the FAA’s policy applicable to waivers of FAA ground safety requirements for licensed commercial launch and reentry activities at certain Federal ranges. The Federal ranges that currently meet the criteria for application of this policy are: Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Vandenberg Air Force Base, Wallops Flight Facility, and Kennedy Space Center. DATES: The policy described herein will be effective 3 November 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information concerning this action, contact Executive Director, Office of Operational Safety, via letter: 800 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC 20591; via email: [email protected]; via phone: 202-267-7793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended and codified at 51 U.S.C. §§ 50901-50923, authorizes the Department of Transportation, and the FAA through delegation, to oversee, license, and regulate commercial launch and reentry activities, and the operation of launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S. citizens or within the United States. Section 50905(b)(3) allows the Secretary to waive a requirement, including the requirement to obtain a license, for an individual applicant if the Secretary decides that the waiver is in the public interest and will not jeopardize the public health and safety, safety of property, and national security and foreign policy interests of the United States.1 This policy statement provides public notice of the FAA’s approach to evaluating waiver applications under 51 U.S.C.
  • Aas 14-281 Suborbital Intercept And

    Aas 14-281 Suborbital Intercept And

    AAS 14-281 SUBORBITAL INTERCEPT AND FRAGMENTATION OF ASTEROIDS WITH VERY SHORT WARNING TIMES Ryan Hupp,∗ Spencer Dewald,∗ and Bong Wiey The threat of an asteroid impact with very short warning times (e.g., 1 to 24 hrs) is a very probable, real danger to civilization, yet no viable countermeasures cur- rently exist. The utilization of an upgraded ICBM to deliver a hypervelocity as- teroid intercept vehicle (HAIV) carrying a nuclear explosive device (NED) on a suborbital interception trajectory is studied in this paper. Specifically, this paper focuses on determining the trajectory for maximizing the altitude of intercept. A hypothetical asteroid impact scenario is used as an example for determining sim- plified trajectory models. Other issues are also examined, including launch vehicle options, launch site placement, late intercept, and some undesirable side effects. It is shown that silo-based ICBMs with modest burnout velocities can be utilized for a suborbital asteroid intercept mission with an NED explosion at reasonably higher altitudes (> 2,500 km). However, further studies will be required in the following key areas: i) NED sizing for properly fragmenting small (50 to 150 m) asteroids, ii) the side effects caused by an NED explosion at an altitude of 2,500 km or higher, iii) the rapid launch readiness of existing or upgraded ICBMs for a suborbital asteroid intercept with short warning times (e.g., 1 to 24 hrs), and iv) precision ascent guidance and terminal intercept guidance. It is emphasized that if an earlier alert (e.g., > 1 week) can be assured, then an interplanetary inter- cept/fragmentation may become feasible, which requires an interplanetary launch vehicle.
  • The Flight Plan

    The Flight Plan

    M A R C H 2 0 2 1 THE FLIGHT PLAN The Newsletter of AIAA Albuquerque Section The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA ALBUQUERQUE MARCH 2021 SECTION MEETING: MAKING A DIFFERENCE A T M A C H 2 . Presenter. Lt. Col. Tucker Hamilton Organization USAF F-35 Developmental Test Director of Operations INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Abstract I humbly present my flying experiences through SECTION CALENDAR 2 pictures and videos of what it takes and what it is like to be an Experimental Fighter Test Pilot. My personal stories include NATIONAL AIAA EVENTS 2 major life-threatening aircraft accidents, close saves, combat SPACE NUCLEAR PROPULSION REPORT 3 flying revelations, serendipitous opportunities testing first of its kind technology, flying over 30 aircraft from a zeppelin to a ALBUQUERQUE DECEMBER MEETING 5 MiG-15 to an A-10, and managing the Joint Strike Fighter De- velopmental Test program for all three services. Through ALBUQUERQUE JANUARY MEETING 6 these experiences you will learn not just what a Test Pilot does, but also gain encour- ALBUQUERQUE FEBRUARY MEETING 7 agement through my lessons learned on how to make a difference in your local com- munities…did I mention cool flight test videos! CALL FOR SCIENCE FAIR JUDGES 9 Lt Col Tucker "Cinco" Hamilton started his Air Force career as an CALL FOR SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATIONS 10 operational F-15C pilot. He supported multiple Red Flag Exercises and real world Operation Noble Eagle missions where he protect- NEW AIAA HIGH SCHOOL MEMBERSHIPS 10 ed the President of the United States; at times escorting Air Force One.
  • The Evolving Launch Vehicle Market Supply and the Effect on Future NASA Missions

    The Evolving Launch Vehicle Market Supply and the Effect on Future NASA Missions

    Presented at the 2007 ISPA/SCEA Joint Annual International Conference and Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com The Evolving Launch Vehicle Market Supply and the Effect on Future NASA Missions Presented at the 2007 ISPA/SCEA Joint International Conference & Workshop June 12-15, New Orleans, LA Bob Bitten, Debra Emmons, Claude Freaner 1 Presented at the 2007 ISPA/SCEA Joint Annual International Conference and Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com Abstract • The upcoming retirement of the Delta II family of launch vehicles leaves a performance gap between small expendable launch vehicles, such as the Pegasus and Taurus, and large vehicles, such as the Delta IV and Atlas V families • This performance gap may lead to a variety of progressions including – large satellites that utilize the full capability of the larger launch vehicles, – medium size satellites that would require dual manifesting on the larger vehicles or – smaller satellites missions that would require a large number of smaller launch vehicles • This paper offers some comparative costs of co-manifesting single- instrument missions on a Delta IV/Atlas V, versus placing several instruments on a larger bus and using a Delta IV/Atlas V, as well as considering smaller, single instrument missions launched on a Minotaur or Taurus • This paper presents the results of a parametric study investigating the cost- effectiveness of different alternatives and their effect on future NASA missions that fall into the Small Explorer (SMEX), Medium Explorer (MIDEX), Earth System Science Pathfinder (ESSP), Discovery,
  • Space Food and Nutrition

    Space Food and Nutrition

    Educational Product National Aeronautics and Educators Grades K–8 Space Administration EG-1999-02-115-HQEG-1998-12-115-HQ SPACE FOOD AND NUTRITION An Educator’s Guide With Activities in Science and Mathematics Space and Food Nutrition—An Educator’s Guide With Activities in Science and Mathematics is available in electronic format through NASA Spacelink—one of the Agency’s electronic resources specifically developed for use by the educational community. The system may be accessed at the following address: http://spacelink.nasa.gov/products SPACE FOOD AND NUTRITION An Educator’s Guide With Activities in Science and Mathematics National Aeronautics and Space Administration This publication is in the Public Domain and is not protected by copyright. Permission is not required for duplication. EG-1999-02-115-HQ Space Food and Nutrition An Educator’s Guide With Activities in Science and Mathematics Acknowledgments National Aeronautics and Space Administration Special thanks to the following Office of Human Resources and Education contributors and reviewers Education Division Washington, D.C. Charles T. Bourland, Ph.D. System Manager, Space Station Food Education Working Group Flight Crew Support Division NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Debbie A. Brown Writers ISS Education Liaison Angelo A. Casaburri Education Working Group Aerospace Education Services Program NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Gregory L. Vogt, Ed.D. Crew Educational Affairs Liaison Cathy A. Gardner Education Working Group Dickinson Independent School District NASA Johnson Space Center Dickinson, Texas Karol L. Yeatts, Ed.D. Editor 1998 Einstein Fellow Jane A. George Miami Dade County Public Schools Teaching From Space Program Miami, Florida NASA Headquarters Washington, D.C.
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017

    The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017

    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .