DOCSLIB.ORG

An Inquiry Into the LSE's Links with Libya and Lessons to Be Learned

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Woolf Inquiry An inquiry into the LSE’s links with Libya and lessons to be learned October 2011 The Woolf Inqu I r y An inquiry into the LSE’s links with Libya and lessons to be learned o c T o b e r 2 0 1 1 An inquiry into the LSE’s links with Libya and lessons to be learned This report has been prepared by the Woolf Inquiry, an independent inquiry appointed by the council of the lSe to establish the full facts of the lSe’s links with libya. The Inquiry’s Terms of reference, and information on the approach it has taken are included in Appendix 1 of this report. The views and recommendations included in this report are entirely those of lord Woolf. It is for the lSe and it alone to decide whether, and if so how, to act on this report. The Inquiry accepts no legal responsibility or liability for the contents of, or any omissions from, this report. The Inquiry was advertised publicly, and the report is based solely on the information which was provided to the Inquiry prior to 5 october 2011, the date upon which this report was finished. 4 Contents Contents Index of individuals and entities mentioned in the Report 8 Chronology of key events 11 1 Introduction 19 I. The background to the Inquiry 20 II. The central conclusion of the Inquiry 22 III. The LSE’s links with Libya 22 IV. The wider context: the university as a global enterprise 25 2 Saif Gaddafi as a student at LSE 27 I. Saif’s admission: MSc and PhD 28 (A) Saif’s admission to the lSe: MSc in Philosophy, Policy and Social Value 28 (b) Criteria and procedure for PhD admissions 30 (c) Saif’s admission as a PhD student in 2003 31 II. Assistance received by Saif during his academic career 36 III. Unknown outside assistance received by Saif 37 (A) Justification for concern whilst Saif was a student 38 (b) Investigation in 2011 42 (c) The adequacy of the lSe’s response to concerns about outside assistance with Saif’s work 43 IV. Lessons to be learned 46 (A) Differing practices as to PhD admissions 46 (b) Departmental differences 48 (c) Communication and escalation of concerns 50 (D) Guidance on the levels of permissible assistance for a PhD student and rigour in using existing regulations 53 3 The donation 59 I. Introduction: universities and donations 60 II. The source of the funding for the donation 61 (A) The Development committee’s question: what is the source of the money? 62 5 An inquiry into the LSE’s links with Libya and lessons to be learned (b) The source of the donation: payments for contracts? 66 (c) The Gaddafi International charity and Development foundation 68 III. The presentation of the donation to Council: a chapter of failures 70 (A) The failure to give prior notification to council members of the decision they were required to make 71 (b) The failure to present council with sufficient material 72 (1) The available documentation on the donation 73 (2) Preparation of papers for the first Council meeting 74 (3) Preparation of papers for the second Council meeting 74 (c) Council’s focus was drawn away from the essential issue 77 (D) Professor held’s presentation of the donation at the second Council meeting 80 (e) The presentation of the views of Professor fred halliday 84 (f) The presentation of the views of the Development committee 88 (1) The Development Committee view: conditional referral 88 (2) The view of the Development Committee Chairman 89 (G) Conclusion on the presentation to council 90 IV. The second donation from the GICDF 90 V. Attribution of responsibility 90 (A) Responsibility amongst senior members of the lSe staff 90 (b) The contribution of inadequate systems at the lSe for dealing with the ethics of accepting a donation 91 (1) The LSE’s policy 92 (2) Entities within the LSE involved in the scrutiny of donations 93 – Use of the Development Committee to scrutinise donations 93 – ODAR’s role in the scrutiny of donations 94 – Use of the Council to scrutinise donations 95 (3) A new policy and procedure 96 VI. Additional circumstances of the donation: timing of the donation ceremony 98 VII. The influence of gifts 99 (A) The use of the donation from the GIcDf 100 (b) The ability of donors to influence research interests 101 (c) Governance structures within research centres 104 (D) The report of the lSe Global Governance review committee 105 4 Incidental links with Libya 107 I. Introduction 108 II. Incidental links with Libya 109 (A) Links between lord Giddens (former Director of the lSe) and libya 109 (b) Sir howard Davies 109 6 Contents (c) Involvement of other academics in libya 111 (1) Professor Ned McClennen 111 (2) Professor David Held 112 – Business introduction in Libya 112 – Professor Held’s continued advisory role with the Board of the GICDF, after October 2009 113 (D) Lectures by colonel and Saif Gaddafi at the lSe 114 (1) Saif Gaddafi and the Miliband Lecture 114 (2) Colonel Gaddafi: “Libya’s Place in the World” 114 (3) Lessons to be learned 116 III. Structures to monitor risk across the institution 116 5 LSE Enterprise 119 I. Introduction 120 II. LSE-E’s Libyan contracts 121 (A) Training libyan civil servants 121 (b) Individualised tuition for a member of the libyan Investment Authority 122 (c) Other suggestions for training in libya 122 (D) LSe-e’s decision to engage in work in libya 122 III. Commercial contracts and current students 124 IV. The accumulation of reputational risks 125 6 Conclusions 127 I. The broad picture 129 II. Saif as a student 130 III. The donation 134 IV. Incidental links with Libya 136 V. Governance 137 VI. Acknowledgements 139 7 Recommendations 141 Appendices 145 7 An inquiry into the LSE’s links with Libya and lessons to be learned Index of individuals and entities mentioned in the Report ‘Ab’ businessman; donor to centre for Global Governance Allen, Sir Mark Member of the Advisory board of lSe Ideas; bP Special Advisor barber, Professor benjamin former member of the board of the GIcDf barclay, Stephen lSe enterprise, Director; lSe council Member barker, Professor rodney lSe Department of Government; research Student Tutor responsible for admissions to the MPhil/PhD Programme in the Department of Government for 2003-4 battishill, Sir Anthony lSe council Member; chair of october 2009 council Meeting blair, Dr Mary lSe office of Development and Alumni relations, former Director bovens, Professor luc head of lSe Philosophy Department, September 2009 – present bradley, Professor richard head of lSe Philosophy Department, September 2006 – September 2009; Supervisor of Saif Gaddafi’s MPhil/PhD brahimi, Dr Alia research fellow, north Africa Programme, former lSe centre for Global Governance brown, Professor chris lSe Department of International relations; Vice- chair of the lSe Academic board and as such ex-officio member of the lSe council bukhres, omran believed to be an assistant to Saif Gaddafi camber, Angela lSe council Member cartwright, Professor nancy lSe Philosophy Department; Supervisor of Saif Gaddafi’s MPhil/PhD chakrabarti, Shami lSe council Member Dahdaleh, Victor Phillip Governor of the lSe; member of the lSe Development committee Dalton, Sir richard british Ambassador to libya, 1999-2002 Davies, Sir howard Director of the lSe, 2003-2011 Desai, Professor lord Meghnad emeritus Professor at the lSe centre for Global Governance; internal examiner for the examination of Saif Gaddafi’s PhD Dorstewitz, Dr Philipp Tutored Saif Gaddafi during his MSc and MPhil eDb libyan economic Development board fean, Sir Vincent british Ambassador to libya, 2006-2010 8 Index of individuals and entities mentioned in the Report fisher, Aled Dilwyn General Secretary of the lSe Student union, 2008-2010 flemington, Simon lSe enterprise, chief executive Gaskell, louise lSe conference and events office, Deputy events Manager Gaskell, Professor George lSe Pro-Director for Planning and resources, August 2007 - present GIcDf Gaddafi International charity and Development foundation, “Saif’s foundation” Giddens, Professor lord Anthony Director of the lSe 1996-2003; emeritus Professor at the lSe centre for Global Governance hall, Adrian lSe Secretary and Director of Administration halliday, Professor fred lSe Professor of International relations 1985- 2008 hartley, Professor Janet lSe Pro-Director for Teaching and learning, since August 2007 held, Professor David lSe Government Department; co-Director, former centre for Global Governance; commented on two chapters of Saif Gaddafi’s PhD thesis Joffé, Professor George Affiliated lecturer at the Department of Politics and International Studies, university of cambridge; formerly deputy director and acting director of the royal Institute of International Affairs 1997-2000 Kaldor, Professor Mary Professor in the lSe Department of International Development; co-Director, former centre for Global Governance; taught Saif Gaddafi on a course in “Global civil Society” during his MSc Kirk, fiona lSe office of Development and Alumni relations, Director, January 2009- present lIA libyan Investment Authority, libyan sovereign wealth fund Mahmoud, Dr Jibril former Secretary of the libyan economic Development board Marsh, Simon lSe office of Development and Alumni relations, member of staff Mcclennen, Professor edward centennial Professor in Philosophy at the lSe, (“ned”) 2000-2003; formerly coordinator of the MSc in Philosophy, Policy and Social Value McGrew, Professor Anthony external examiner for the examination of Saif Gaddafi’s PhD Monitor Group Global management consulting firm Mountford, roger lSe enterprise, chairman 9 An inquiry into the LSE’s links with Libya and lessons to be learned
Recommended publications
  • The Ethics-Intelligence Tension: Sources and Bypassing Strategies Mark Phythian

    The Ethics-Intelligence Tension: Sources and Bypassing Strategies Mark Phythian

    The Ethics-Intelligence Tension: Sources and Bypassing Strategies Mark Phythian Jan Goldman has focused attention on the potential tension be­ tween ethics and the practice of intelligence in arguing that "ethics­ phobia"-defined as the "fear of performing ethical conduct"­ exists in the U.S. intelligence community.1 In this paper, I explore the sources of this tension, one that applies in varying degrees in all liberal democratic contexts, and the ways in which policymakers seek to bypass or neutralize ethical issues that arise from contem­ porary intelligence practices. It is often claimed that ethics begin where the law ends, but the argument here is that the relationship between law and ethics in the field of security intelligence is far more complex than this suggests. Assertions of legality can be used in order to preempt the ethical question where there is implicit recognition of the difficulty of reconciling values with intelligence practice. Alternatively, utilitarian defenses of intelligence practices rooted in the idea of exception can be constructed, similarly de­ signed to neutralize the ethical question. At different times these approaches have been used separately and in combination. In mak­ ing this argument this paper focuses on two cases: the relationship between ethics and law in relation to the U.S. policy of using armed drones to kill suspected militants, and the question of U.K. com­ plicity in extraordinary rendition and torture. Sources of Tension At the outset it is worth emphasizing that many of the ethical dilemmas that face intelligence professionals, agencies, and gov­ ernments arise from a simple tension.
  • LSE Connect Winter 2012

    LSE Connect Winter 2012

    Connect For alumni of the London School of Economics and Political Science Vol 24, number 2, winter 2012 A rising tide Judith Rees on water research Virtually real Vili Lehdonvirta on real money in a virtual world Director invites alumni to shape LSE’s future LSE residences offer good quality, centrally located, bed and breakfast accommodation to all during the winter vacation! Carr-Saunders Hall Passfield Hall Rosebery Hall W1 WC1 EC1 By choosing to book with LSE Vacations you are helping to provide safe, secure and affordable housing for our students. The additional revenue from vacation trading contributes to keeping student rents as low as possible. This environment supports and enhances the learning goals of our diverse community, in particular our efforts to widen participation. LSE is committed to recruiting the best possible students with the highest academic and intellectual potential, regardless of their economic or social background. Also available: LSE TopFloor! a range of high quality rooms, studios and apartments available year round. for alumni, staff and current students (Staff, student or alumni ID required) VOLUME 24 NUMBER 2 CONTENTS Editor’s message Earlier this month Professor Craig Calhoun, the new Director of LSE, ran a question and answer session on Twitter. It was fun. Professor Calhoun tweets regularly anyway (you can follow him on @craigjcalhoun) but the idea behind this one-hour intense session was to allow students, staff and alumni – and indeed 16 24 the general public – to ask anything they wished and to get instantaneous answers back. In all, 137 questions were asked, with nearly two-thirds from students but a fair number from Features Regulars alumni.
  • LSE Connect Summer 2013

    LSE Connect Summer 2013

    Connect For alumni of the London School of Economics and Political Science Vol 25, number 1, summer 2013 Battling recession Christopher Pissarides on macroeconomics Scholars at risk Latefa Guemar is no ordinary fellow Research in pictures: LSE’s Research Festival goes visual LSE residences offer good quality, centrally located accommodation to all during the summer vacation! Bankside House By choosing to book with LSE Vacations you are helping to provide safe, secure and affordable Carr-Saunders Hall housing for our students. The additional revenue Grosvenor House from vacation trading contributes to keeping student rents as low as possible. High Holborn This environment supports and enhances the learning Northumberland House goals of our diverse community, in particular our efforts to widen participation. LSE is committed to Passfield Hall recruiting the best possible students with the highest Rosebery Hall academic and intellectual potential, regardless of their economic or social background. Also available: LSE TopFloor! a range of high quality rooms, studios and apartments available year round. for alumni, staff and current students (Staff, student or alumni ID required) VOLUME 25 NUMBER 1 CONTENTS Editor’s message In the last issue of LSE Connect, Director Professor Craig Calhoun asked alumni what made LSE distinct. A similar exercise was set for staff and students and the results are fascinating (see page 6). In all, nearly 200 people responded with insights that were 6 18 intelligent, creative, often witty – and even in verse. As our feature says: “They showed a remarkable degree of agreement about what makes LSE distinctive. Analysis showed that Features Regulars respondents valued critical engagement, diversity, collegiality and cosmopolitanism.” As ever, the writers for LSE Connect provide ample proof of the strength of critical Why LSE is special Headline news 4 engagement at the School.
  • Human Rights Watch All Rights Reserved

    Human Rights Watch All Rights Reserved

    HUMAN RIGHTS Delivered Into Enemy Hands US-Led Abuse and Rendition of Opponents to Gaddafi’s Libya WATCH Delivered Into Enemy Hands US-Led Abuse and Rendition of Opponents to Gaddafi’s Libya Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-940-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org SEPTEMBER 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-940-2 Delivered Into Enemy Hands US-Led Abuse and Rendition of Opponents to Gaddafi’s Libya Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Key Recommendations....................................................................................................................
  • Events Open to the Lse Community And

    Events Open to the Lse Community And

    EVENTS OPEN TO THE LSE COMMUNITY AND THE PUBLIC to 6 September December 2019 20 Finance Most finance professionals can drive the car... But do they understand how the engine works? At LSE, we believe in understanding why things work. We take you below the surface to understand the fundamentals of finance, giving you the tools to accelerate your career in a changing marketplace. MSc Finance (Part-time) The MSc Finance (Part-time) is LSE’s most established Executive Master’s programme. Taught in the evenings, it provides a unique opportunity for busy professionals to combine a full-time career with the opportunity to study a world- class MSc Finance programme that is grounded in academic depth and rigour. Join us for an Information Evening or a one-to-one session to discuss your application. Register at lse.ac.uk/finance 19_0577 FinanceAdvert_Events.indd 1 07/08/2019 15:29 Finance WELCOME Everyone is welcome to attend LSE’s public events, where some of the Most finance professionals can drive the car... most influential figures in the social sciences can be heard. Events are generally free and open to all, with entry on a first come, first But do they understand served basis – unless otherwise stated. It does get busy so we advise people to turn up 20 minutes before the advertised time. For ticketed events, please go to lse.ac.uk/events and fill in the online booking form to request how the engine works? a ticket. Allocations of tickets are set aside for LSE staff and students. Transcripts, podcasts and videos of an increasing number of LSE events are available online after the event at lse.ac.uk/lse-player.
  • Tony and Lizzie and Bandar and Muammar by Jeffrey Steinberg and Scott Thompson

    Tony and Lizzie and Bandar and Muammar by Jeffrey Steinberg and Scott Thompson

    EIR Strategy AN IMPERIAL LOVE AFFAIR Tony and Lizzie and Bandar and Muammar by Jeffrey Steinberg and Scott Thompson March 7—From practically the day he took office as Prime Minister in May 1997, Tony Blair, along with top officials of MI6, Lord Jacob Rothschild, Baroness Liz Symons, and leading members of the British Royal Family, have pro- moted Muammar Qaddafi, and fostered Libya’s growing political and economic ties with Brit- ain, right up to the present moment, as the Libyan dictator goes through his final “Hitler in the bunker” demise. By official British accounts, Blair’s initial back-channel to Qaddafi was Sir Mark Allen, the MI6 chief for North Africa and the Middle East. In the immediate aftermath of the March 2003 Anglo-American invasion of Iraq, and over- throw of Saddam Hussein, secret talks began with Qaddafi’s emissaries, for Libya to abandon its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) pro- gram, in return for a full normalization of rela- tions with the U.K. and the United States. On Dec. 3, 2003, a meeting took place at the Travellers Club in London, involving British diplomat Sir Nigel Sheinwald, MI6 man Allen, British and American government non-prolifer- ation and intelligence officials William Ehrman, David Landsman, Stephen Kappes, and Robert Joseph, and Libyan intelligence officials Musa Kusa and Abdullah Alobidi. LaRouchePAC Two weeks later, Prime Minister Blair and Why do the British support Qaddafi, even now? Think it might have President George W. Bush proudly announced something to do with money? 30 Strategy EIR March 11, 2011 that Qaddafi would allow WMD inspectors into Libya, as a first step toward Libya abandoning its WMD pro- gram.
  • FESTIVAL PROGRAMME at a GLANCE Monday 19 February Tuesday 20 February Wednesday 21 February Thursday 22 February Friday 23 February Saturday 24 February

    FESTIVAL PROGRAMME at a GLANCE Monday 19 February Tuesday 20 February Wednesday 21 February Thursday 22 February Friday 23 February Saturday 24 February

    LSE FESTIVAL Rethinking Beveridge for the 21st century 19-24 FEBRUARY lse.ac.uk/festival #LSEFestival #LSEBeveridge OVER THE FESTIVAL WEEK WE WILL BE SHINING A LIGHT ON THE “FIVE GIANTS” IDENTIFIED IN THE BEVERIDGE REPORT, RE-CAST FOR THE WELCOME CONTENTS 21ST CENTURY AND FOR THE GLOBAL CONTEXT. We live in increasingly divided societies where the activists who had made social contracts that bind us are fraying. One reason LSE their home at that is globalisation, which has intensified competitive time. Indeed, we have a rich 4 6 7 pressures. Another is technology, which has tradition of such work, from increased the returns to highly skilled labour and Dame Eileen Younghusband, thereby exacerbated inequality. Technology has whose work, including her eponymous report in also transformed our awareness of what is 1959, led to the establishment of social work as a happening around the world and the way we profession, to Dr BR Ambedkar, the architect of the communicate and organise ourselves socially Constitution of India. and politically, sometimes in a way that builds As LSE’s 16th Director, I want to continue this great HEALTH & social cohesion, but often in ways that divide. SKILLS tradition – thought and action – by revisiting the AT A GLANCE EDUCATION & The consequence of this is that social work carried out by Beveridge and his LSE SOCIAL CARE “Disease” “Ignorance” sustainability, society’s internal cohesion and colleagues some three quarters of a century Beveridge’s Giant of Beveridge’s Giant of ability to hold together over time, is in jeopardy. ago and make it relevant to the challenges of the 21st century.
  • Summer 2008 Vol 20 Number 1 Magazine

    Summer 2008 Vol 20 Number 1 Magazine

    Summer 2008 Vol 20 Number 1 Magazine 54 Lincoln’s Inn Fields LSE’s newest building takes shape THE MAGAZINE FOR ALUMNI OF THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE LSE Residences are open to commercial guests during vacations. 10% discount available to alumni, staff and students. With low prices in unbeatable central London locations it’s the ideal place to stay! OF LONDON www.lsevacations.co.uk Individuals, families and groups welcome Singles from £32* Twins from £50* Triples from £64* Good quality, affordable accommodation (*Summer 2008 rates) in unbeatable central locations For further information and booking enquiries contact us on +44 (0)20 7955 7575 or email [email protected] Book online at www.lsevacations.co.uk Accommodation availability Summer 2008 5 July – 27 September Christmas 2008-09 13 December – 10 January Easter 2009 21 March – 26 April Bankside House London SE1 Butler’s Wharf London SE1 Carr-Saunders Hall London W1 Grosvenor House Studios London WC2 High Holborn London WC1 Northumberland House London WC2 Passfield Hall London WC1 Rosebery Hall London EC1 Contents Editor’s message Features If there is a theme to this issue, it’s travel and change. 6 The power game Peter Sutherland, the new chair of LSE Court of Paul Kennedy debates Governors, writes about migration in today’s globalised American power in today’s world and describes the urge to move in pursuit of a fractured world. better life as ‘one of the most natural and powerful’ of 9 Beyond borders all human instincts. The dynamics of migration So it is fitting that we should also look in this issue at the are evolving with remarkable United States, a country whose history is intimately linked speed.
  • The London School of Economics & Political Science

    The London School of Economics & Political Science

    The London School of Economics & Political Science The Trouble with Studying the Troubles: How and Why an Epistemic Community Emerges By: Corey R Jentry A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, 24 February 2017. 1 DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MRes/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 91,286 words. 2 ABSTRACT This research is concerned with issues of episteme, epistemology, and community. It asks how and why an epistemic community emerges? It looks at the study of the Northern Ireland conflict and peace process as covered in the British and Irish political science academy in order to answer this question. This research is thus ultimately about knowledge, knowledge creators, and the circumstances and conditions in which they develop. It is also a case study of what happens when academics engage with political events.
  • Strategic Plan 2011-16 LSE in Profile

    Strategic Plan 2011-16 LSE in Profile

    Strategic Plan 2011-16 LSE in Profile RESEARCH CENTRES Asia Research Centre for Economic Centre Performance (ESRC) Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion Accounting Centre for Anthropology Philosophy of Centre for Analysis Finance Natural and of Time Series Economics Social Science Centre for Climate Economic History European Institute Change Economics Centre for and Policy (ESRC) ACADEMIC the Study of DEPARTMENTS Gender Human Rights International LSE Health and History Geography and Social Care Environment Financial Markets International Group Relations BSc/BA Government LSE Ideas: Centre for International Language LLB/LLM Grantham Research Affairs, Diplomacy Centre MA/MSc/MPA/MRes International Institute on Climate and Strategy MPhil/PhD Development Law Change and the MBA CORE Media and Environment Suntory and Toyota Management Communications International Centres International for Economics and Mathematics Methodology Growth Centre Related Disciplines Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method Social Psychology Social Policy LSE Cities Spatial Economics Sociology Research Centre (ESRC) Statistics Middle East Centre ESSENTIAL FOUNDATIONS LSE Library Centre for Learning Technology Central Administration IT Services Other Support Services The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) is one of the world’s foremost centres for social science teaching and research. This profile illustrates the breadth of academic expertise in the School’s academic departments and research centres. All academics are involved in teaching and research.
  • LSE Connect Summer 2012

    LSE Connect Summer 2012

    Connect For alumni of the London School of Economics and Political Science Vol 24, number 1, summer 2012 Olympics LSE joins in the fun New director Judith Rees introduces Craig Calhoun Highs and lows Stories from the favelas LSE residences offer good quality, centrally located accommodation to all during the summer vacation! Bankside House By choosing to book with LSE Vacations you are helping to provide safe, secure and affordable Carr-Saunders Hall housing for our students. The additional revenue from vacation trading contributes to keeping Grosvenor House student rents as low as possible. High Holborn This environment supports and enhances the learning Northumberland House goals of our diverse community, in particular our efforts to widen participation. LSE is committed to Passfield Hall recruiting the best possible students with the highest Rosebery Hall academic and intellectual potential, regardless of their economic or social background. Also available: LSE TopFloor! a range of high quality rooms, studios and apartments available year round. for alumni, staff and current students (Staff, student or alumni ID required) VOLUME 24 NUMBER 1 CONTENTS Editor’s message When the UK hosts the Olympics in just a few short weeks, it will be the culmination of years of planning – for athletes and administrators alike. The excitement has not bypassed LSE, where LSE academics have researched and advised on the likely legacy of the games as well as their impact 11 38 on happiness, London borough budgets and children’s fitness, amongst other themes. LSE alumni are also set to play their part. Mara Yamauchi (MSc Politics of the World Features Regulars Economy 1996) will be running the marathon for team GB, while others will be commentating or using their LSE-honed skills to predict the medals (see page 6).
  • Hidden Files: ARCHIVAL SHARING, ACCOUNTABILITY, and the RIGHT to the TRUTH

    Hidden Files: ARCHIVAL SHARING, ACCOUNTABILITY, and the RIGHT to the TRUTH

    Hidden Files: ARCHIVAL SHARING, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND THE RIGHT TO THE TRUTH John D. Ciorciari and Jesse M. Franzblau* ABSTRACT Societies undertake a variety of truth and accountability measures to deal with legacies of gross human rights violations. For those measures to be effective, courts, commissions, victims and their representatives, and the general public need access to official records and archives. Archival materials can shed light on specific acts of abuse, as well as the larger patterns of violence or repression in which those acts were embedded. In addition to domestic government archives, the classified records of “third countries”—states outside the jurisdiction in which a particular crime occurred—can be crucial in advancing truth and accountability. Nevertheless, the law seldom requires third countries to share their secret files, and voluntary disclosure remains relatively rare. This constitutes an important weak link in the international human rights regime. In this article, we argue for enhanced third-country disclosure of human rights files. We argue both for enhanced voluntary declassification and stronger legal norms to mandate the release of information about gross human rights violations, emphasizing the role of civil society organizations in driving both forms of disclosure. We use examples from Latin America and elsewhere to show the power of declassified U.S. documents and other third-country records to elucidate specific crimes and the bureaucratic systems and international cooperation behind them. We discuss the case of Libya to demonstrate the need for similar disclosure to illuminate abuses in the * John D. Ciorciari is an Assistant Professor at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan.