Great Crested Newt Survey Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Crested Newt Survey Report Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.1 Environmental Statement Document 6.9.3 DOCUMENT 6.9.5 Great Crested Newt Survey Report The Yorkshire and Humber (CCS Cross Country Pipeline) Development Consent Order Under Regulation 5(2)(a) of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Application Reference: EN070001 June 2014 The Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.i Environmental Statement Document 6.9.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE ONSHORE SCHEME 1 1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION 3 1.4 SURVEY AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 4 2 Legislation and Policy 5 2.1 RELEVANT LEGISLATION 5 2.2 PLANNING POLICY 6 2.3 UK POST-2010 BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK 6 2.4 LOCAL BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (LBAP) 7 3 Methodology 8 3.1 CONSULTATION WITH NATURAL ENGLAND 8 3.2 DESK BASED STUDY 8 3.3 FIELD SURVEY 10 3.4 POPULATION SIZE CLASS ASSESSMENT 13 3.5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 14 3.6 SURVEY LIMITATIONS 16 3.7 QUALITY ASSURANCE 17 4 Results 18 4.1 CONSULTATION WITH NATURAL ENGLAND 18 4.2 DESK BASED STUDY 18 4.3 FIELD SURVEY 20 5 Evaluation 35 6 References 41 Figures and Appendices 42 Appendix A: Natural England Consultation 43 Appendix B: Habitat Suitability Index Assessment Results 44 The Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.ii Environmental Statement Document 6.9.5 Appendix C: Detailed Survey Results – All Ponds 2012/2013 57 Appendix D: Great Crested Newt Ponds – Population Assessment Survey Results 58 Appendix E: Great Crested Newt Ponds – Photographs 65 The Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.1 Environmental Statement Document 6.9.5 1 Introduction 1.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE ONSHORE SCHEME 1.1.1 AECOM was commissioned by National Grid Carbon (NGC) to undertake great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) surveys to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the Yorkshire and Humber Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Cross Country Pipeline (Onshore Scheme). This was in order to determine the status of great crested newts in ponds which may be affected by the Onshore Scheme. 1.1.2 The Onshore Scheme (as shown on Figure 1) description, definitions of terminology and development are presented in Chapters 2: Onshore Scheme Development and Alternatives (Document 6.2) and Chapter 3: Onshore Scheme Description of the Environmental Statement (Document 6.3). 1.2 SUMMARY OF SCOPING: DEFINING THE STUDY AND SURVEY AREAS 1.2.1 The scoping assessment for the Onshore Scheme was undertaken in 2012 which defined the Desk Study Area, Study Area and Survey Area for the great crested newt habitat assessments and surveys. The areas were defined as follows: Desk Based Study Area 1.2.2 The ecological desk based study undertaken included the Preferred Route Corridor (PRC) (Figure 1) plus 1 kilometre (km) buffer zone from the PRC boundary to establish the presence of protected species, including great crested newt. This has been termed as the Desk Based Study Area. Study Area 1.2.3 An initial scoping exercise which comprised a desk based pond and habitat assessment was undertaken in early 2012. This was undertaken to map the location of all ponds located within the PRC and a buffer zone of 500 metre (m); this is the average distance great crested newts are known to move from their breeding ponds (English Nature, 2001). This area has been termed as the ‘Study Area’. Other standing waterbodies that had potential to support great crested newt were also assessed where relevant, this The Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.2 Environmental Statement Document 6.9.5 included drains and lakes. The collective term ‘pond’ is used throughout the report and other types of waterbody are differentiated where necessary. 1.2.4 Ponds were then ‘scoped in or out’ to determine further assessment and survey work, for example, this was based on pond size, the presence/absence of significant barriers to great crested newt migration such as roads/rivers, and the presence/absence of habitat linkages to the PRC. 1.2.5 As the Onshore Scheme has evolved, a distance of 250 m from ponds was applied for potential temporary habitat loss/disturbance areas, whilst 500 m has been retained when assessing permanent habitat loss elements of the Onshore Scheme such as at Above Ground Installation (AGI) sites. Survey Area Initial Habitat Suitability Index Survey Area 1.2.6 An initial Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) Assessment (Oldham et al., 2000; ARG UK, 2010) was undertaken in 2012 of all ponds (as identified during the desk based study) located within the Study Area. HSI assessments continued in 2013 of ponds located within any land not previously accessed. The 2013 assessments were undertaken within the narrower Scoping Corridor (Figure 1) plus 250 m buffer zone which was informed by the results of the evolving environmental and engineering led investigations and included any ponds associated with the Construction Compounds. Presence/Absence Surveys 2012 1.2.7 Great crested newt presence/absence surveys began in 2012 on ponds identified during the HSI assessments, these included ponds within the PRC plus 500 m buffer zone. Presences/Absence Survey and Population Assessments 2013 1.2.8 In 2013, the remaining suitable ponds located within the Scoping Corridor plus 250 m buffer zone had presence/absence great crested newt surveys. Additionally, ponds within 500 m of proposed AGIs (where permanent habitat loss is predicted) had presence/absence surveys undertaken in 2013. 1.2.9 Population assessment great crested newt surveys were undertaken in 2013 on all ponds where great crested newts had been confirmed by presence/absence surveys in 2012 and 2013 which were located within the Scoping Corridor plus 250 m or 500 m buffer zones. The Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.3 Environmental Statement Document 6.9.5 1.2.10 Collectively, the ponds included in the HSI Assessments, presence/absence great crested newt surveys and population assessment surveys are termed as the ‘Survey Area’. 1.2.11 For the purpose of this baseline report, the great crested newt results that are presented and discussed within the report include: • The Application Boundary plus 250 m buffer zone for potential temporary effects (this includes the Pipeline Envelope and Other Onshore Scheme Elements (see Chapters 2: Onshore Scheme Development and Alternatives (Document 6.2) and Chapter 3: Scheme Description of the Environmental Statement (Document 6.3)).; and • The AGI sites plus 500 m buffer zone for potential permanent effects. 1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION 1.3.1 The route of the Pipeline transverses through the two counties of East Riding of Yorkshire and North Yorkshire and contains a wide variety of habitats, characteristic of arable farmland. The habitats are dominated by arable land, towns/villages and woodland with areas of improved and semi- improved neutral grassland. Running water (rivers, canals, becks and drains) is present as is standing water in the form of lakes and ponds, which vary in size and uses. Arable field boundaries comprise mainly species- poor hedgerows and drains. 1.3.2 In relation to great crested newts, these habitats within and in close proximity to the Onshore Scheme are considered to provide suitable areas for supporting breeding, foraging and hibernating sites. 1.3.3 For the purpose of consultation and presenting the results, the Onshore Scheme is divided into four Onshore Scheme Sections as shown on Figure 1 and detailed below: • Camblesforth Multi-junction to Tollingham Block Valve (including the White Rose CCS connection; abbreviated to Camblesforth Multi-junction to Tollingham Block Valve in the remainder of this report); • Tollingham Block Valve to Dalton Block Valve; • Dalton Block Valve to Skerne Block Valve; and 1.3.4 Skerne Block Valve to Barmston Pumping Station (including Barmston Pumping Station to Mean Low Water Spring [MLWS], abbreviated to Skerne Block Valve to Barmston Pumping Station in the remainder of this report). The Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.4 Environmental Statement Document 6.9.5 1.4 SURVEY AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 1.4.1 The aim and objectives of the survey work and the subsequent report presented herein were to: Aim • To determine the status; distribution and population levels of great crested newts within and adjacent (up to 500m) to the Onshore Scheme Application Boundary in order to inform the Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA). Objectives • Undertake a Desk Based Study including consultation with Natural England on the proposed study and survey scope; and review of existing ecological data to identify any records for great crested newts within the Desk Based Study Area; • Identify ponds within the Study Area and scope in or out for HSI Assessment and further surveys; • Undertake great crested newt HSI assessments on those ponds scoped in for further survey within the Survey Area; • Undertake a great crested newt presence/absence survey on those ponds identified to have potential to support great crested newts within the Survey Area following the HSI assessment; • Determine the population size class estimate of great crested newts in those ponds with confirmed presence of great crested newts in the Survey Area; and • Record any other notable species such as other amphibians from the surveys. The Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.5 Environmental Statement Document 6.9.5 2 Legislation and Policy 2.1 RELEVANT LEGISLATION 2.1.1 The decline in great crested newt conservation status across Europe has led to its listing on Annex IV (‘European Protected Species’) of the Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora, adopted in 1992.
Recommended publications
  • Doc-5.2-ES-ENC-App-5.7-Great-Crested-Newt-Report.Pdf, 1.35 MB
    Roxhill (Junction 15) Ltd Northampton Gateway, Northampton GREAT CRESTED NEWT SURVEY REPORT May 2018 Great-Crested Newt Report fpcr FPCR Environment and Design Ltd Registered Office: Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby DE74 2RH Company No. 07128076. [T] 01509 672772 [F] 01509 674565 [E] [email protected] [W] www.fpcr.co.uk This report is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without the written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd. Ordnance Survey material is used with permission of The Controller of HMSO, Crown copyright 100018896. Rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved / Date - Draft 1 SJN / 03.01.18 RJS / 15.01.18 A PH / 11.05.18 PH / 11.05.18 J:\5700\5772\ECO\GCN\2017\GCN Report\5772 App 5.7 GCN Report.Docx 1 Great-Crested Newt Report fpcr CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 LEGISLATION ...................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 6 4.0 RESULTS & ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 10 5.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT & MITIGATION STRATEGY ....................................................... 18 TABLES Table 1: HSI Scores
    [Show full text]
  • East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston Upon Hull City Council
    East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston upon Hull City Council Joint Minerals Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment: Stage 1 - Screening Report Amended for Revised Preferred Approach 2015 East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston upon Hull City Council Joint Minerals Local Plan Amended Habitats Regulations Assessment: Stage 1 - Screening Report Amended for Revised Preferred Approach 2015 April 2015 Notice This report was produced by Atkins Limited (Atkins) for East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston upon Hull City Council in response to their particular instructions. This report may not be used by any person other than East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston upon Hull City Council without express permission. In any event, Atkins accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston upon Hull City Council. No information provided in this report can be considered to be legal advice. 5049925.014 Rev 1 Contents Section Page 1. Introduction and Background 1 1.1 Background to this Assessment Report 1 1.2 Background to Habitats Regulations Assessment 1 1.3 Outline of this Review Report 2 2. Plan Details 3 2.1 Proposed Plan 3 2.2 Provisions within the Plan that Protect International Sites 3 3. Methodology 4 3.1 Determination of the International Sites included in the HRA 4 3.2 Obtaining Information on International Sites with the Potential to be Affected 4 3.3 Obtaining Information on Other Projects and Plans 6 3.4 Assessing the Impacts of the Plan 7 4.
    [Show full text]
  • North Pasture, Gembling, Driffield, YO25
    North Pasture, Gembling, Driffield, YO25 8HS ■ Fine Country House set in c.17.00 Acres ■ Sympathetically Modernised & Extended ■ Modern Farmhouse Kitchen with AGA ■ Magnificent Landscaped Grounds ■ Four Double Bedrooms & Two Bathrooms ■ Five Receptions & Snooker Room Set in just over c.17 acres of landscaped gardens and grounds, this fine country house has been sympathetically modernised and extended to provide tasteful accommodation of over 4,500 square feet, the property occupying a splendid private and tranquil setting at the foot of the Yorkshire Wolds. The original house has origins dating from the late 18th century having been renovated and remodelled from the late 1990's onwards, it retains a number of period features including stone flagged floors, stripped pine doors and beamed ceilings, the later extension having created a courtyard setting, to which there is a further range of traditional brick and pantile buildings, which if required and subject to necessary consents and approvals could form a further annex conversion. Briefly the house accommodation includes; entrance porch, kitchen, utility/boot room, breakfast room open to panoramic sun room, reception hall/snug, W.C., 42' formal lounge/dining room, rear entrance cloaks, study, snooker room with separate bar and cellar room. To the first floor there are four double bedrooms, the master bedroom having a separate dressing room and en-suite shower room and a further family bath/shower room. Externally there is a useful separate 4,000 sq. ft. modern barn, the grounds including well tended landscaped gardens, lawns, feature pond and grass paddock, beyond which the present owners have created a wildlife haven which includes a 1.10 acre lake and woodland walks.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Crested Newt Survey of Catsfield Cep School, East Sussex
    GREAT CRESTED NEWT SURVEY OF CATSFIELD C.E.P SCHOOL, EAST SUSSEX (TQ 728 135) ON BEHALF OF MACKELLAR SCHWERDT ARCHITECTS JUNE 2009 BARRY KEMP CONSERVATION LIMITED ‘Amblehurst’ Nevill Road Crowborough East Sussex TN6 2RA (t) 01892 663942 (f) 01892 613341 (m) 07780 665177 (e) [email protected] Barry Kemp Conservation Ltd – Catsfield CEP School report : June 2009 1 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Legal Protection of reptiles & amphibians 3.0 Location of site 4.0 Existing records 5.0 Habitat 6.0 Great crested newt survey 7.0 Results 8.0 Survey constraints 9.0 Interpreting the results 10.0 Assessment of risk to GCN by the proposed development 11.0 Interpreting the legislation 12.0 Risk avoidance measures 13.0 Conclusions 14.0 Recommendations 15.0 References Appendix Barry Kemp Conservation Ltd – Catsfield CEP School report : June 2009 2 1.0 Introduction This report was commissioned by MACKELLAR SCHWERDT ARCHITECTS to establish the presence or absence of Great crested newts (Triturus cristatus) within the school pond and to help inform any possible mitigation measures prior to a planning application to East Sussex County Council to construct a new pre school building. 2.0 Legal Protection of reptiles & amphibians The Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 protects Grass snake (Natrix natrix), Adder (Vipera berus) Slow-worm (Anguis fragilis) and Common lizard (Zootoca vivipara) against deliberate killing and injuring (subsection 9.1) In addition the Sand lizard (Lacerta agilis), Smooth snake (Coronella austriaca), Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) and Great crested newt receive full protection under the Act and are also protected under the Conservation Regulations of 1994 (Natural Habitats) .
    [Show full text]
  • East Riding of Yorkshire and Kingston Upon Hull
    East Riding of Yorkshire and Kingston upon Hull Joint Minerals Local Plan Background Paper 3 Site Selection Summer 2015 Summer 2015 Rev 1 East Riding of Yorkshire and Hull City Council Joint Minerals Local Plan Background Paper 3 Site Selection Summer 2015 Notice This report was produced by Atkins Limited for East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston upon Hull City Council for the specific purpose of the Joint Minerals Local Plan. This report may not be used by any person other than East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston upon Hull City Council without East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston upon Hull City Council’s express permission. In any event, Atkins accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Kingston upon Hull City Council. Summer 2015 Rev 1 Joint Minerals Local Plan Background paper 3 Contents Section Page 1. Candidate Sites and Assessment Methodology 1 2. Candidate Site Descriptions and Summary of Assessment 14 3. Recommended Sites 56 Summer 2015 Rev 1 Joint Minerals Local Plan Background paper 3 1. Candidate Sites and Assessment Methodology Introduction 1.1 Because of the importance of minerals in contributing to the economy and the quality of life through their utilisation, Minerals Planning Authorities are required to make provision for the future supply of certain minerals which occur within their areas by providing guidance on the locations where future mineral extraction is likely to be most acceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Sites Consultation
    East Riding Local Development Framework Allocations Development Plan Document - Potential Sites Consultation Part 1: Explanatory Text and Site Schedules May 2010 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document 1 Introduction 4 The Allocations Development Plan Document 4 The East Riding Local Development Framework 4 Sustainability Appraisal 4 What happens next? 5 How can I get involved? 6 2 Consideration of Sites 8 Where have the potential sites come from? 8 Where do we need to allocate land? 10 How much land do we need to allocate? 11 What are the considerations for allocating land? 18 3 Potential Sites for Allocation 24 The potential sites plans 24 The schedule of sites 24 The status of sites presented in this document 26 Responding to the sites included on the maps 26 4 Schedule of Sites 30 Appendices Appendix A 32 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document 1 Introduction East Riding of Yorkshire Council 3 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document The Allocations Development Plan Document 1.1 The Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD) is an important part of the East Riding Local Development Framework (LDF). When adopted, it will allocate pieces of land (sites) for specific uses, including for housing, employment, retail, open space and transport. 1.2 This Potential Sites consultation is the first step in preparing an Allocations DPD. It presents site allocation options for you to consider. It is split into two parts - this document being Part 1, which includes a set of site schedules - and Part 2, comprising a set of maps outlining potential sites in various locations in the East Riding.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Domesday
    Book ❧ Places ❧ Names ❧ API OPEN DOMESDAY The first free online copy of Domesday Book NAME: YORK (ST PETER), ARCHBISHOP OF This name is associated with 234 places before the Conquest; 295 after the Conquest. (Note that the same name may not be the same person.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT CRESTED NEWT MITIGATION SCHEME: Laneside Quarry, Kirkheaton, Huddersfield
    GREAT CRESTED NEWT MITIGATION SCHEME: Laneside Quarry, Kirkheaton, Huddersfield Introduction Laneside Quarry is a large (22.5 hectares) shale and sandstone quarry on the eastern side of Kirkheaton, West Yorkshire. Quarrying and brickwork operations ceased at the site in the 1990s and permission has since been obtained by The Casey Group to use for the site for landfill. In 2002, Great Crested Newts (Triturus cristatus) were detected in two large ponds and several smaller pools on the bed of the quarry. The Great Crested Newt receives full protection under European and UK wildlife legislation. Description and Status of Great Crested Newts The Great Crested Newt is the UK’s largest newt and can reach a length of up to 170mm. Great Crested Newts can be distinguished from the other two British species of newts by their size (Great Crested Newts are larger and much darker than other species). In the breeding season the male Great Crested Newts have a jagged crest along their back which is separated from a smoother crest along the tail. Adult male Great Crested Newt Great Crested Newts have suffered and major decline in Britain over the last century this is thought to be as a result of the loss of natural breeding sites (marl pit ponds), drainage of wetlands, silting up of ponds, fragmentation of habitats as a result of development and the loss of habitats such as grasslands and woodlands used by newts for hibernation and shelter. Local and national surveys have estimated rates of colony loss in England at between 0.5% and 4% a year during the 1960’s to 1990’s; this is equivalent to the loss of 40,000 breeding ponds in 30 years (English Nature 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • U DOG Papers of the Ogle Family 1566-1975 of Flamborough
    Hull History Centre: Papers of the Ogle Family of Flamborough U DOG Papers of the Ogle Family 1566-1975 of Flamborough Historical background: The Ogle family has roots in pre-conquest Northumberland, where they had extensive properties including the castles of Ogle and Bothal. They were involved in border battles with the Scots and Lord Ogle was one of the English leaders at the Battle of Flodden. It is possible that the family was involved with the Constable family of Flamborough and that a member of the Ogle family was in the military service of Marmaduke Constable (1443-1518). This may explain why John and Jennet Ogle arrived in Flamborough in the mid-sixteenth century. He died in 1605 and his wife in 1614 (U DOG/11/30). John and Jennet Ogle had a son, George, in 1566, who served in Ireland with Robert Constable and in the 1630s was a churchwarden at St Oswald's in Flamborough. He died in 1638 leaving three houses, 21 cottages and three closes. Two branches of the family by this time existed and they owned considerable property in Flamborough. George's son, John (b.1605), died prematurely in circa 1638, leaving behind a widow, Thomasina, who did not die until 1696. Their son, also John, was born just before he died, probably in 1637. He had three sons: John (1667-1731), George (1670-1742) and William (1671-1757). George had four children: John, George, Mark and Jane. There are a few papers in the collection from this line of the family, but the bulk are papers of William Ogle, his wife, Elizabeth Jarratt, and their descendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Egg-Strip Surveying for Detection of Pond-Breeding Newts: Does Egg-Strip Substrate Matter?
    SALAMANDRA 53(4) 494–500 30 OctoberOlivia 2017 CharltonISSN &0036–3375 Todd Lewis Artificial egg-strip surveying for detection of pond-breeding newts: Does egg-strip substrate matter? Olivia Charlton1 & Todd R. Lewis2 1) 29 Park Stenak, Carharrack, Redruth, TR16 5SL, UK 2) Westfield, 4 Worgret Road, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 4PJ, UK Corresponding author: Olivia Charlton, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 7 December 2016 Accepted: 6 March 2017 by Alexander Kupfer Abstract. Survey methods for detecting newts (Salamandridae: Pleurodelinae) in ponds by identifying presence of eggs laid during their aquatic breeding condition are useful and often deployed across various population surveillance activi- ties. Egg-strip surveying is an effective way of detecting newt presence in a pond by providing an egg-laying medium for newts that can be selectively inspected by a surveyor. In this study we deployed a series of different plastic substrates to investigate substrate laying preference by three species of newts; Lissotriton helveticus, L. vulgaris and Triturus cristatus. Our results revealed that L. helveticus and L. vulgaris significantly preferred green and longer varieties of black egg-strip substrate over a thicker less pliable plastic substrate. Contrastingly T. cristatus exhibited no significant preference between substrates. Results from this study indicate that if surveyors choose to use black long, black short, black, green, yellow, or red coloured substrates, or thicker black plastic substrates for egg-strip surveys, detection for T. cristatus remains constant but with improved detection and mild preference on more pliable plastic substrates. However, for L. vulgaris and L. helveti­ cus the thicker gauge black egg-strips may significantly reduce the effectiveness of detection and are discriminated against compared to more pliable grades of green and longer varieties of black plastic substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Libraries and Multi Service Centres Consultation
    Libraries and Multi Service Centres Consultation 7,780 people told us what is We’ve listened and have a proposal important to them about the for the future of the library service library service and multi service centres Have your say on our proposal, take part in the public consultation from 25 May to 3 August 2016 www.eastriding.gov.uk/proposalconsultation The library service and multi service centres consultation Local Government has experienced significant reductions in funding. Since 2010, East Riding of Yorkshire Council has made savings of £118 million and needs to find a further £60 million over the next four years. The council is proud of its record on libraries and customer services and is committed to providing excellent services in the future. Our proposal takes full account of what you told us in the consultation exercise we undertook from 29 September to 21 December 2015. The proposal ensures that there will continue to be excellent and comprehensive library service and multi service centre provision across the East Riding of Yorkshire whilst contributing to the savings that the council needs to make. In the consultation we asked: ‘Our Proposal’ ‘If savings were to be made to the library budget and you had to choose, should the council save Our proposal would: money by...’ Closing some branch libraries but keeping 1. Retain a library or multi service centre in opening hours the same at the remaining each major town or village in the East Riding branch libraries but reduce opening hours Or 2. Retain a mobile library service which would Keeping all current branch libraries open but continue to deliver services across the East reducing their opening hours Riding but reduce the level of service 87% chose to ‘keep all current branch libraries open but reduce their opening hours.’ 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Gembling Primary School, Long Lane, Gembling, YO25 8HR
    LAND PROPERTY BUSINESS ACCOMMODATION www.eastriding.gov.uk/propertysearch FOR SALE – POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE Former Gembling Primary School, Long Lane, Gembling, YO25 8HR THE PROPERTY • Situated in open countryside • Site area extending to 0.215 ha (0.53 acre) comprising former school Property offered with outbuildings and adjacent undeveloped land. • Freehold offered with vacant possession • May be suitable for a variety of uses including residential conversion, subject to obtaining any necessary planning consents OFFERS INVITED Valuation and Estates, County Hall, Beverley HU17 9BA LOCATION TENURE Gembling is a hamlet in the civil parish of Foston on The Seller (East Riding of Yorkshire Council) holds the Wolds. It is situated approximately 8 miles south- the freehold title to the land (HM Land Registry Title west from the coastal resort of Bridlington and 4 Number YEA58854), as shown edged red on the miles east from the market town of Driffield. Site Plan, and invites offers for its purchase, which may be conditional or unconditional. The council reserves the right to include appropriate restrictive covenants or conditions within the sale documentation. The council is currently seeking to register the land coloured blue on the Site Plan as this forms part of the land conveyed to the council dated 21 March 1956. Subject to the council being successful, this land will be transferred to the purchaser. The freehold title of the Property will be made available with vacant possession upon completion. ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE The EPC rating is as follows:- • Main school building has a rating of D • Modular classroom has a rating of D SITE PLAN Both reports are available to view online (attached to these particulars) ASBESTOS SURVEY The council has an asbestos survey for the Property dated March 2019 which is available on request.
    [Show full text]