Cause Papers Project Standardization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cause Papers Project Standardization 1 Cause Papers in the Diocesan Courts of the Archbishopric of York, 1300–1858 Editing and Standardisation in the Cause Papers Database The Cause Papers project provided an on-line searchable catalogue of more than 13,000 cause papers relating to cases heard between 1300 and 1858 in the Church Courts of the diocese of York, the original records for which are held at the Borthwick Institute for Archives at the University of York. The project aimed to pioneer a new standard of excellence in data accuracy and standardization. Cataloguing such a large and varied number of records posed numerous challenges in these areas, including the problem of how to incorporate spelling and language variations of surname and place names. The following document provides information on the methods used by the project team in compiling, editing and standardizing the data. It is split into the following sections:- 1) Information provided by the database 2) List of standard reference works used by the project team 3) List of types and sub-types of cases commonly used in the database 4) Standardization of Forenames 5) Standardization of Surnames – Part A 6) Standardization of Surnames – Part B 7) Problematic Place-names – Identification and Standardization Please note that this text is not intended as a guide to on-line catalogue. Users requiring assistance with searching the catalogue should consult the on-screen help text. 2 Editing and standardisation for the Cause Paper Database 1) Information provided by the database Owing to the volume and complexity of manuscript material involved, it was not possible to provide full transcriptions of the cause papers. Instead, the following data is included: General background information: - court type - brief details of the type of case; - the start and end date of the case; - details of which types of documents are included (eg. libel, deposition, sentences) - the number of documents in each case - case outcome Information about participants - names of all participants in the case (not only plaintiffs and defendants, but also witnesses, proctors, etc), including all the variant spellings of each surname, together with a standardized, modern version of the surname to facilitate searching. - Role in the case - Locations associated with them, including place of residence - Age - Occupation - Status Information about locations: - all locations listed in the document, including the places of residence for all the participants (if known), with all the variant spellings, linked to a standardized, modern version of the place-name. 3 This document takes each of these data types in turn and provides details of the decisions made about how to enter this information in a standard form, to ensure that the database was easily searchable. Court type The details of the type of court the case was heard in are given in the following standard forms: - undefined - Chancery - Consistory - High Commission - Curia Ebor - Dean and Chapter - Exchequer - Prerogative - Peculiar Type of case In each instance, a ‘generic case type’ was selected from the following options: - Undefined - Annulment - Appeals - Benefice cases - Breach of faith - Defamation 4 - Immorality - Matrimonial - Pew dispute - Separation - Testamentary - Tithe - Violation of Church Rights In addition, a ‘specific type’ was given in most cases and a list kept by the research team. This list, created in Excel, is provided as section 3 of this document and identifies the most commonly used specific types. The exception is Tithe cases, in which the ‘specific type’ field was used to indicate the crops and livestock mentioned in the cause. Dates Where the start and end dates of the case were unambiguous, a ‘certain date’ field was selected and the information was entered in this format: day/month/year (e.g. 26/06/1678). In some cases, it was possible only to attribute the case to a month or year, in which case the date would appear thus: 06/1678 or simply 1678. Many cases, however, had some level of ambiguity about the dating, so an ‘uncertain date’ field was selected and recorded in the same format. Whilst it was not practical to maintain this distinction on the website, records listing a definite day or month indicate a ‘certain’ date. For the purposes of dating the documents, all members of the project team used the standard reference work: C. R. Cheney, ed., A Handbook of Dates for Students of British History, rev. M. Jones (2nd edn. Cambridge, 2000). For causes in which no date could be found, the team sometimes left the date field blank, but more commonly estimated a century and put the start and end dates as the beginning and end of that period. Note also that the project team recorded the dates as they appeared in the cause papers. This means that up until 1752 (when the current, standard, Gregorian calendar was 5 adopted) the dates reflect the historic use of the Julian calendar, in which the year starts in March - thus 01/1690 follows 12/1690, not 12/1689. Extant Documents The database states whether or not the following types of document are included in the case: deposition(s), libel(s) and sentence(s). The number of pieces (separate documents) of manuscript was also recorded. Depositions generally refer to witness statements. Technically, libels are the charges drawn up by the plaintiff; however, in some instances a record may indicate that it has a libel if the documents include a counter-allegation by the defendant. The sentence gives an indication of which party (if any) won the case and who was charged costs. It does not provide the judge’s thoughts on the cause. Case outcome In the vast majority of cases, this simply states whether the plaintiff or defendant won or lost, occasionally with information about the award of costs and whether the judge’s decision was appealed against. The cause papers do not usually provide an insight into the sanctions imposed on participants, however. Locations All locations are listed in the document, including the places of residence for all the participants, with all the variant spellings, linked to a standardized, modern version of the place-name. Where possible the researchers included a description of the place type, which was selected from the following options: - undefined - archdeaconry - borough - boundaries 6 - chapelry - city - civil parish - common/fell - country - diocese - division - ecclesiastical parish - ecclesiastical province - fieldname - forest - habitation - hamlet - hundred - grange - liberty - manor - mill - prebend - region/district - religious house - rural deanery - site - street name - tithing region - town - township - urban area - vernacular region - vernacular site - ville 7 - wapentake - waterways - woodland The modern form of the place-name was derived thus: 1. Place-names were always translated from the Latin, regardless of date. 2. In the vast majority of cases, the modern forms of place-names are found within the English Placename Society series, as the Yorkshire and Nottinghamshire volumes are particularly fulsome. On occasion, it has been necessary to use other sources, notably the Victoria County History volumes and reliable internet resources. All places smaller than a parish in the database are linked to the relevant parish, city, town or county, to make searching easier. 3. In order to determine when certain areas became designated as parishes, this reference work has been used: F. A. Youngs, Guide to the Local Administrative Units of England (2 vols. London, 1991). If it was not clear which parish was meant, the ancient parish designated by Youngs, Guide, was chosen and a brief note made in the ‘additional notes’ box. 4. In some cases, a place has been split across two or more parishes. In these cases, one has been chosen and a list has been kept. This list forms section 7 of this document. 5. Religious houses were identified using D. Knowles and R. N. Hadcock, Medieval Religious Houses: England and Wales (London, New York & Toronto, 1953) and the Victoria County History series. The modern version was always entered in this form: ‘Abbey of St Mary’, ‘Priory of Lewes’. 6. Fieldnames cannot always be identified, but often have recognizable forms, e.g. ‘Suthfeld’ or ‘Bushopfeld’. In such cases, a suitable modern version has been provided. 7. In cases where a place-name cannot be identified, the first variant is taken as the standard form. 8 Information about participants Where possible, given names were provided in English, in a standard form, using the following reference work: C.T. Martin, ‘A Few Latin Christian Names With Their English Equivalents’ in The Record Interpreter (2nd edn. Sussex, 1910), pp. 451-464. Some Christian names appeared in the manuscripts which were not included in this work. A short separate list was kept of the standard forms relating to such names used during the project, which is available in section 4 of this document. Sometimes a participant was a corporate body, such as ‘dean and chapter’ or ‘prior and monks’. In such cases, ‘dean and chapter of x’ was recorded in the given name box, in modern English. In some cases, as an individual dean/prior is also listed, in which case he appears as a separate entry. Surname standardization was more complex. All the variant spellings used in the manuscript were included and can be searched. In addition, a standardized modern spelling of the surname was added, using the following system: 1. Language/translation of names. Prior to 1734, the Church records were kept in Latin (although some parts of them were written in English depending on date). Therefore, before 1734, all Latin surnames were translated to give a modern English version. In this context, it is worth noting that ‘Relicta’ has been translated as ‘Widow’. From 1734, surnames were not translated, but simply modernized where appropriate. On the rare occasions where a surname appears in a language other than Latin or English, it has not been given a standard version.
Recommended publications
  • Greenwich Cottage, High Moor Lane, Brearton, HG3 3DD £595,000 Greenwich Cottage, High Moor Lane, Brearton £595,000
    Greenwich Cottage, High Moor Lane, Brearton, HG3 3DD £595,000 Greenwich Cottage, High Moor Lane, Brearton £595,000 A most attractive stone built detached country cottage, which retains a wealth of charming period features and is delightfully situated on the edge of this much sought after village. 3 3 2 Description A stunning stone cottage under a rustic pantiled roof which offers flexible accommodation arranged over two floors. The property retains numerous period features, including exposed ceiling beams and trusses, rustic brick chimney breast with an open fire, dressed stone internal walls and interior shutters in most rooms. These features are combined with modern additions, such as the stylish bathrooms and shower rooms. The accommodation benefits from oil central heating, electric heating and double glazing. The drawing room faces South and has french doors linking to the garden, thus enjoying the day's sunshine. The drawing room leads to a dining kitchen and cloakroom/WC and links with the conservatory, which doubles as an additional dining room and overlooks the adjoining fields. From there is a further reception room in the form of sitting room with multi-fuel burning stove, open trusses and french doors onto the garden. Leading from the sitting room is a guest bedroom with fitted wardrobes and en-suite shower room. On the first floor is a master bedroom with fitted wardrobes and en-suite bathroom, further double bedroom with fitted wardrobes and the house bathroom. The gardens are a particular feature of the property being predominately lawned with well stocked herbaceous borders, containing mature trees, ensuring excellent privacy.
    [Show full text]
  • House Number Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Town/Area County
    House Number Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Town/Area County Postcode 64 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 70 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 72 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 74 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 80 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 82 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 84 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 1 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 2 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 3 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 4 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 1 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 3 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 5 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 7 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 9 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 11 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 13 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 15 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 17 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 19 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 21 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 23 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 25 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16
    [Show full text]
  • U DDBA Papers of the Barnards Family 1401-1945 of South Cave
    Hull History Centre: Papers of the Barnards Family of South Cave U DDBA Papers of the Barnards Family 1401-1945 of South Cave Historical background: The papers relate to the branch of the family headed by Leuyns Boldero Barnard who began building up a landed estate centred on South Cave in the mid-eighteenth century. His inherited ancestry can be traced back to William and Elizabeth Barnard in the late sixteenth century. Their son, William Barnard, became mayor of Hull and died in 1614. Of his seven sons, two of them also served time as mayor of Hull, including the sixth son, Henry Barnard (d.1661), through whose direct descendants Leuyns Boldero Barnard was eventually destined to succeed. Henry Barnard, married Frances Spurrier and together had a son and a daughter. His daughter, Frances, married William Thompson MP of Humbleton and his son, Edward Barnard, who lived at North Dalton, was recorder of Hull and Beverley from the early 1660s until 1686 when he died. He and his wife Margaret, who was also from the Thompson family, had at least seven children, the eldest of whom, Edward Barnard (d.1714), had five children some of whom died without issue and some had only female heirs. The second son, William Barnard (d.1718) married Mary Perrot, the daughter of a York alderman, but had no children. The third son, Henry Barnard (will at U DDBA/14/3), married Eleanor Lowther, but he also died, in 1769 at the age of 94, without issue. From the death of Henry Barnard in 1769 the family inheritance moved laterally.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Central Lincolnshire Settlement Hierarchy Study Sep 2014
    PRELIMINARY CENTRAL LINCOLNSHIRE SETTLEMENT HIERARCHY STUDY September 2014 (Produced to support the Preliminary Draft Central Lincolnshire Local Plan) CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Policy Context 1 3. Methodology 2 4. Central Lincolnshire’s Settlements 2 5. The Settlement Categories 3 6. The Criteria 4 7. Applying the Criteria 6 8. Policy and ‘Localism’ Aspirations 9 9. Next Steps 9 Appendix: Services and Facilities in 10 Central Lincolnshire Settlements 1. Introduction 1.1. A settlement hierarchy ranks settlements according to their size and their range of services and facilities. When coupled with an understanding of the possible capacity for growth, this enables decisions to be taken about the most appropriate planning strategy for each settlement. 1.2. One of the primary aims of establishing a settlement hierarchy is to promote sustainable communities by bringing housing, jobs and services closer together in an attempt to maintain and promote the viability of local facilities and reduce the need to travel to services and facilities elsewhere. A settlement hierarchy policy can help to achieve this by concentrating housing growth in those settlements that already have a range of services (as long as there is capacity for growth), and restricting it in those that do not. 1.3. In general terms, larger settlements that have a higher population and more services and facilities are more sustainable locations for further growth. However, this may not always be the case. A larger settlement may, for example, have physical constraints that cannot be overcome and therefore restrict the scope for further development. Conversely, a smaller settlement may be well located and with few constraints, and suitable for new development on a scale that might be accompanied by the provision of new services and facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire.. Far 683
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] LINCOLNSHIRE.. FAR 683 Darnell William, Bardney, Lincoln Dawson William, Nettleton, Caistor Dickinson Thomas, Friskney, Boston Darnill George, Orby, Boston Dawson Wm. Skeldyke, Kirton, Boston DickinsonW.Sandpits,Westhorpe,Spaldg Darnill Jn. Jack, Grainthorpe, Grimsby Dawson William, Union road, Caistor Dickinson Wm. Westhorpe, Spalding Daubeny Jabez, North Kyme, Lincoln Day Edward Jas. Messingham, Brigg Dickson Frederick, Tumby, Boston Dauber John William, Ruckland, Louth Day John, Wood Enderby, Boston Diggle E. Suttun St. Edmunds, Wisbech Daubney C. Hagworthingham, Spilsby Day John Wm. Scatter, Kirton Lindsey Diggle J.H. Loosegate rd. Moultn.Spldng Dau bney Charles, Leake, Boston Day Ro bt. Scotter Hig hfield, Ki rtonLindsy DiggleJ ohnHarber, j u n. Moulton, Spaldng Daubney Charles, jun. Leake, Boston Day Robert,Scotterthorpe,KirtonLindsy Diggle Thos. Ewerby Thorpe, Sleaford Daubney George, Belchford, Horncastle Day Thomas, Church street, Caistor Diggle Thomas, Weston, Spalding Daubney H.Manor frm.Canwick, Lincoln Day William, Scatter, Kirton Lindsey Dilworth James, Horse Shoe rd.Spaldmg Daubney Henry, Wyberton, Boston Day Wm. Cotehouses, 0 wston Ferry Dimbleby W .BishopNortn. Kirtn.Lindsy Daubney James, Navenby S.O Dean Arthur W. Dowsby, Falkingham Dinnis Thomas, Anderby, Alford Daulton Austin, West Keal, Spilsby Dean Edward, Algarkirk, Boston Dinnison Thomas Hy. Burr la. Spalding Daulton Henry, Bilsby, Alford Dean John, Drayton, Swineshead,Boston Dinsdale John, Nth.Killingholme, Ulceby Daulton Jesse, The Grange, East Keal Dean John, Drove end, Wisbech Dion Frederick, Sibsey, Boston Coates, East Keal, Spilsby Dean John, Goxhill, Hull Dion James, Sibsey, Boston Daulton Joseph, Keal Coates, Spilsby Dean John Chas. Drove end, Wisbech Dion Jesse, Sibsey, Boston Daulton Thomas, East Kirkby, Spilsby Dean John Hy.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Code Site Name Town Name Design Location Designation Notes Start X Start Y End X End Y
    site_code site_name town_name design_location designation_notes Start X Start Y End X End Y 45913280 ACC RD SWINEMOOR LA TO EAST RIDING HOSP BEVERLEY Junction with Swinemoor lane Signal Controlled Junction 504405 440731 504405 440731 Junction with Boothferry Road/Rawcliffe 45900028 AIRMYN ROAD GOOLE Road/Lansdown Road Signal Controlled Junction 473655 424058 473655 424058 Pedestrian Crossings And 45900028 AIRMYN ROAD GOOLE O/S School Playing Fields Traffic Signals 473602 424223 473602 424223 45900028 AIRMYN ROAD GOOLE O/S West Park Zebra Crossing 473522 424468 473522 424468 45904574 ANDERSEN ROAD GOOLE Junction with Rawcliffe Road Signal Controlled Junction 473422 423780 473422 423780 45908280 BEMPTON LANE BRIDLINGTON Junction with Marton Road Signal Controlled Junction 518127 468400 518127 468400 45905242 BENTLEY LANE WALKINGTON Junction with East End/Mill Lane/Broadgate Signal Controlled Junction 500447 437412 500447 437412 45904601 BESSINGBY HILL BRIDLINGTON Junction with Bessingby Road/Driffield Road Signal Controlled Junction 516519 467045 516519 467045 45903639 BESSINGBY ROAD BRIDLINGTON Junction with Driffield Road/Besingby Hill Signal Controlled Junction 516537 467026 516537 467026 45903639 BESSINGBY ROAD BRIDLINGTON Junction with Thornton Road Signal Controlled Junction 516836 466936 516867 466910 45903639 BESSINGBY ROAD BRIDLINGTON O/S Bridlington Fire Station Toucan Crossing 517083 466847 517083 466847 45903639 BESSINGBY ROAD BRIDLINGTON Junction with Kingsgate Signal Controlled Junction 517632 466700 517632 466700 Junction
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 114 Summer 2018
    Summer 2018 Activity ctivity Newsletter of the Mountain Activity Section ISSUE 114 SUMMER 2018 Leyburn Why MAS is good for the soul Festival of Walking & Cycling Tour de Yorkshire Kent Settle Whitby Arundel Ambleside Western Lake District South Derbyshire Dales Erik’s first trig! This issue’s contributors: John & Margaret Allen, Tricia Anderson, Trevor Batchelor, Toni Busuttil- Reynaud, John Gerner, Elaine Grayson, David Hall, Christine & Graham Mason, Trev Masters, Gordon & Nicky Prosser, Chris & Sue Rogers, Melanie Shearn, Judith Vince, Sandra Wain, Colin Wild, Andrew Wood Activity Issue 114 Trev MASters’ Voice Firstly, on behalf of us all, I welcome Melanie Shearn as our new editor of Activity. Also, Melanie, a big thank-you for taking on this important position. And also, of course, many thanks to her predecessor, Toni, for all his excellent, award-winning work over so many years. After a generally disappointing start to the season with several meets having to be cancelled, it’s now encouraging to note that the vast improvement to the weather has enabled us to get those vans out and things seem to be in full swing. I was hugely disappointed therefore that health concerns led me to cry off attending the Festival of Walking and Cycling – I actually got as far as Wakefield! – especially, as from all accounts it was an extremely enjoyable and successful event. Congratulations and thanks to all in Northern Area who were involved in its planning and its running. You even managed to arrange fantastic weather! I wrote in our last edition about the need to ensure we have enough volunteers to fill essential positions and it’s therefore heartening to know that Peakland and Northern Areas, and the Section itself, achieved a full complement.
    [Show full text]
  • 128 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    128 bus time schedule & line map 128 Crossgates <-> Pickering View In Website Mode The 128 bus line (Crossgates <-> Pickering) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Crossgates <-> Pickering: 7:43 AM (2) Pickering <-> Scarborough: 7:35 AM - 7:20 PM (3) Scarborough <-> Pickering: 7:30 AM - 5:30 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 128 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 128 bus arriving. Direction: Crossgates <-> Pickering 128 bus Time Schedule 42 stops Crossgates <-> Pickering Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 7:43 AM Rowan Fields, Crossgates Tuesday 7:43 AM Seamer Crossroads, Seamer Seamer Road, Irton Wednesday 7:43 AM Seamer Roundabout, Seamer Thursday 7:43 AM Friday 7:43 AM Main Street, Irton Saturday Not Operational Porrit Lane, Irton Seamer Road, East Ayton Carr Lane, East Ayton 128 bus Info Direction: Crossgates <-> Pickering Castlegate, East Ayton Stops: 42 Trip Duration: 51 min Methodist Church, West Ayton Line Summary: Rowan Fields, Crossgates, Seamer Crossroads, Seamer, Seamer Roundabout, Seamer, Main Street, Irton, Porrit Lane, Irton, Seamer Road, Surgery, West Ayton East Ayton, Carr Lane, East Ayton, Castlegate, East Ayton, Methodist Church, West Ayton, Surgery, West Dale Farm Touring Park, East Ayton Ayton, Dale Farm Touring Park, East Ayton, Middle Lane, Hutton Buscel, Bus Shelter, Hutton Buscel, Middle Lane, Hutton Buscel Nursing Home, Hutton Buscel, West End Farm, Hutton Buscel, St Helens Caravan Park, Hutton Bus Shelter, Hutton Buscel Buscel,
    [Show full text]
  • Leyburn Housing Need Report
    Leyburn and Surrounding Villages Housing Need Report Draft Report March 2019 Amanda Madden Rural Housing Enabler Richmondshire District Council Mercury House, Station Road Richmond Tel: 01748 901117 Email: [email protected] CONTENTS page Areas covered – population and household data 3 Leyburn Town Plan Background 4 Summary 1. Parish Summary 5 2. Introduction 5 3 Aim 5-6 4. Survey distribution and response 6 5 Existing Household Composition 6 6. Key findings Housing need 7 - 10 7 Comments from respondents 10 8 Housing Need Table 11 - 16 9. Recommendations 17 2 AREAS COVERED IN THE REPORT – POPULATION & HOUSEHOLD DATA PARISH NAME POPULATION HOUSEHOLD Nos LEYBURN 2183 1160 SPENNITHORNE (inc Hutton Hang) 198 99 HARMBY 371 198 MIDDLEHAM 825 476 FINGHALL (inc Akebar) 166 74 REDMIRE (inc Castle Bolton with E & W Bolton) 384 237 WENSLEY 151 74 BELLERBY 364 193 PRESTON UNDER SCAR 170 109 2011 Census has not been able to breakdown some of the areas and has included small settlements as indicated in the table above LEYBURN TOWN PLAN BACKGROUND In late 2017 residents and businesses in Leyburn and the surrounding area were invited to take part in a comprehensive survey to find out what people thought about the town and the future challenges it faced. More than 1000 respondents gave their views on issues ranging from Council services to public events and car parking; the responses, including more than 5000 written comments, were analysed, prioritised and published in May 2018 as the Leyburn Town Plan. With reference to Richmondshire District Council’s current Local Plan calling for a large number of new houses to be built in and around Leyburn the survey solicited views on the type and tenure of houses in any new developments.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 Arrowheads
    THE MILLENNIUM BOOK OF TOPCLIFFE John M. Graham The MILLENNIUM BOOK OF TOPCLIFFE John M. Graham This book was sponsored by Topcliffe Parish Council who provided the official village focus group around which the various contributors worked and from which an application was made for a lottery grant. It has been printed and collated with the assistance of a grant from the Millennium Festival Awards for All Committee to Topcliffe Parish Council from the Heritage Lottery Fund. First published 2000 Reprinted May 2000 Reprinted September 2000 Reprinted February 2001 Reprinted September 2001 Copyright John M. Graham 2000 Published by John M. Graham Poppleton House, Front Street Topcliffe, Thirsk, North Yorkshire YQ7 3NZ ISBN 0-9538045-0-X Printed by Kall Kwik, Kall Kwik Centre 1235 134 Marton Road Middlesbrough TS1 2ED Other Books by the same Author: Voice from Earth, Published by Robert Hale 1972 History of Thornton Le Moor, Self Published 1983 Inside the Cortex, Published by Minerva 1996 Introduction The inspiration for writing "The Millennium Book of Topcliffe" came out of many discussions, which I had with Malcolm Morley about Topcliffe's past. The original idea was to pull together lots of old photographs and postcards and publish a Topcliffe scrapbook. However, it seemed to me to be also an opportunity to have another look at the history of Topcliffe and try to dig a little further into the knowledge than had been written in other histories. This then is the latest in a line of Topcliffe's histories produced by such people as J. B. Jefferson in his history of Thirsk in 1821, Edmund Bogg in his various histories of the Vale of Mowbray and Mary Watson in her Topcliffe Book in the late 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2016 Butchered Bones, Carved Stones: Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England Shawn Hale Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in History at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Hale, Shawn, "Butchered Bones, Carved Stones: Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England" (2016). Masters Theses. 2418. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2418 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Graduate School� EASTERNILLINOIS UNIVERSITY " Thesis Maintenance and Reproduction Certificate FOR: Graduate Candidates Completing Theses in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree Graduate Faculty Advisors Directing the Theses RE: Preservation, Reproduction, and Distribution of Thesis Research Preserving, reproducing, and distributing thesis research is an important part of Booth Library's responsibility to provide access to scholarship. In order to further this goal, Booth Library makes all graduate theses completed as part of a degree program at Eastern Illinois University available for personal study, research, and other not-for-profit educational purposes. Under 17 U.S.C. § 108, the library may reproduce and distribute a copy without infringing on copyright; however, professional courtesy dictates that permission be requested from the author before doing so. Your signatures affirm the following: • The graduate candidate is the author of this thesis. • The graduate candidate retains the copyright and intellectual property rights associated with the original research, creative activity, and intellectual or artistic content of the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Clapham Parish Wills and Inventories 1541 – 1603
    Clapham Parish Wills and Inventories 1541 – 1603 A Clapham Village History Project 2016 - 2018 The further backward you can look, the further forward you can see (W.S.Churchill) INTRODUCTION This project was funded by Stories in Stone, a scheme of conservation and community projects concentrated on the Ingleborough area. The scheme was developed by the Ingleborough Dales Landscape Partnership, led by Yorkshire Dales Millennium Trust, and supported by the Heritage Lottery Fund. A group of volunteers, brought together in 2016 by Ken Pearce, Sheila Gordon, Mary Slater and Michael Slater, made digital images of wills and inventories for the ancient parish of Clapham, North Yorkshire, for transcription and analysis. This parish comprised Austwick, Clapham, Feizor, Lawkland, Newby and Newby Cote. Clapham ancient parish was chosen as collections of wills and inventories for neighbouring ancient parishes Giggleswick, Horton-in-Ribblesdale and Ingleton have already been made. An eventual comparative study of all of these records will be of value; this report considers the wills and inventories separately to make valid comparisons with other parishes easier. The documents relevant to this work are held at the Lancashire Record Office (LRO) in Preston, Lancashire. The LRO staff have been most obliging and helpful. Corrections have been made to the LRO catalogue where names of testators were incorrectly recorded. Some of the documents were in such a delicate, fragmented and unreadable state that they were not photographed. The digitising of the documents was carried out with equipment provided by Capturing the Past - a Stories in Stone project training volunteers to catalogue and digitise local archives.
    [Show full text]