East Riding Local Development Framework Allocations Development Plan Document - Potential Sites Consultation

Part 1: Explanatory Text and Site Schedules

May 2010

Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

1 Introduction 4 The Allocations Development Plan Document 4 The East Riding Local Development Framework 4 Sustainability Appraisal 4 What happens next? 5 How can I get involved? 6 2 Consideration of Sites 8 Where have the potential sites come from? 8 Where do we need to allocate land? 10 How much land do we need to allocate? 11 What are the considerations for allocating land? 18 3 Potential Sites for Allocation 24 The potential sites plans 24 The schedule of sites 24 The status of sites presented in this document 26 Responding to the sites included on the maps 26 4 Schedule of Sites 30

Appendices

Appendix A 32 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

East Riding of Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

1 Introduction

East Riding of Yorkshire Council 3 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

The Allocations Development Plan Document

1.1 The Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD) is an important part of the East Riding Local Development Framework (LDF). When adopted, it will allocate pieces of land (sites) for specific uses, including for housing, employment, retail, open space and transport.

1.2 This Potential Sites consultation is the first step in preparing an Allocations DPD. It presents site allocation options for you to consider. It is split into two parts - this document being Part 1, which includes a set of site schedules - and Part 2, comprising a set of maps outlining potential sites in various locations in the East Riding.

1.3 The Allocations DPD aims to allocate sites throughout the East Riding in order to deliver the vision, objectives and planning policies set out in the Core Strategy, and to address the needs of the local community. However, it will not allocate any sites in the area covered by the Town Centre Area Action Plan. The Area Action Plan will allocate sites in this area. In addition, it will not allocate any sites for waste management or minerals development as the Joint Waste DPD and Joint Minerals DPD will deal with these issues respectively. The East Riding Local Development Framework

1.4 The Local Development Framework, or LDF, is the name for the portfolio of documents that together will provide the framework for managing development and addressing the key planning issues within the area. When the individual documents - known as Development Plan Documents (DPDs) - are adopted, they will guide investment decisions and will be used to determine planning applications. The East Riding LDF comprises five DPDs:

Core Strategy Allocations Bridlington Town Centre Area Action Plan Joint Minerals (prepared with Hull City Council) Joint Waste (prepared with Hull City Council)

1.5 A number of Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) will also be prepared, covering detailed policy matters, such as affordable housing, that will add further guidance to the Core Strategy's policies.

1.6 Once complete, the LDF will replace the existing plans prepared under the previous planning system, including the Joint Structure Plan for Hull and the East Riding, and the four Local Plans of the former boroughs of , , East Yorkshire and . Sustainability Appraisal

1.7 A Sustainability Appraisal (incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment) must be undertaken for all DPDs to assess their potential economic, environmental and social impacts. At this Potential Sites stage, a draft Part 2 Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report and a draft Sustainability Appraisal Site Assessment Methodology (SASAM) have been produced for consultation.

1.8 The draft Part 2 Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report provides a review of relevant plans and programmes and baseline data relating to the LDF. It sets out a number of sustainability objectives that the proposed allocations will be assessed against. The draft SASAM updates the existing Housing Site Assessment Methodology and will be used (when finalised) to carry out

4 Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

an appraisal of all of the considered sites -not just housing. As well as getting feedback on the Potential Sites, we would also like to receive your comments on these documents. Details of how to respond are set out on the next page.

Appropriate Assessment

1.9 Appropriate Assessment is required to assess whether the DPD could have a potential significant impact on internationally designated nature conservation sites. The site designations that are subject to appropriate assessment are listed below:

Special Protection Areas (SPA) for rare, vulnerable or migratory birds under the EU Birds Directive Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) for other flora, fauna and habitats of Community interest under the EU Habitats Directive Sites that are being considered for designation as a SPA or SAC. These are known as Potential SPAs (pSPA), and Candidate SACs (cSAC) Ramsar sites, which are wetlands of global importance, listed under the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance.

1.10 At this potential sites stage of the DPD, no Appropriate Assessment work has been carried out, as we need a clearer idea of which sites will be allocated. The process will start at the next stage of the DPD’s development where preferred site allocations will be presented. What happens next?

1.11 The responses to this document will be considered in producing a Preferred Sites document, which is due for consultation in early 2011. The Preferred Sites consultation will set out, with reasoning, which sites the Council considers suitable for allocation and why other sites were not considered suitable or necessary. A Publication version of the DPD will follow which will be a document that the Council considers to be the final DPD. An examination by a planning inspector will follow in mid 2012. Subject to the inspectors findings the document is then adopted by the Council in early 2013. The full process of preparing the DPD is set out in Figure 1.

Figure 1 The Allocations DPD process

Preferred Potential Publication Submission to Examination Adoptation Sites Sites Secretary of State Consultation

1.12 The production of the Allocations DPD is an important step towards producing an adopted Proposals Map, which will show allocations made in all DPDs adopted by the Council including the Joint Minerals DPD and Joint Waste DPD).

5 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

How can I get involved?

We are keen to hear what you have to say. We will be holding a number of exhibitions and ‘surgeries’ during the consultation period to publicise the Allocations DPD and accompanying Sustainability Appraisal documents and address any queries or concerns.

You can view this document in libraries, Customer Service Centres and on our website. You may also request a hard copy (for which we have to make a charge to cover our printing and postage costs) or a copy on CD by contacting us by telephone or email.

We would prefer you to tell us what you think by filling in our questionnaire, which is available in libraries, Customer Service Centres, online, or on request from us.

The consultation period runs from Tuesday 4th May until Monday 12th July 2010. For the latest information about what’s going on where and when, please visit our website.

Our contact details

Address:

Forward Planning, East Riding of Yorkshire Council, Room FS32, County Hall, Beverley HU17 9BA

Telephone: 01482 391750

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.eastriding.gov.uk/planning/ldf

Seeking independent advice and support

Planning Aid provides free, independent and professional advice on planning issues to community groups and individuals who cannot afford to pay a planning consultant. Yorkshire Planning Aid also provides a programme of community planning, training and education activities.

Planning Aid contact details

Address: Yorkshire Planning Aid, The Studio, 32 The Calls, Leeds, LS2 7EW

Telephone: 0113 204 2460 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.planningaid.rtpi.org.uk

For general planning advice contact the Planning Advice Helpline:

Telephone: 0870 850 9808 Email: [email protected]

6 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

2 Consideration of Sites

East Riding of Yorkshire Council 7 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Where have the potential sites come from?

2.1 The sites presented in this document have come from a wide variety of sources including those submitted as land bids, undeveloped allocations in the existing Local Plans and recommendations arising from various LDF evidence base documents (such as the Employment Land Review and others described below).

2.2 For a number of years, the Council has been encouraging landowners, agents, and other organisations to submit land bids so that their land can be considered for allocation through the LDF. Some of the sites were submitted for a particular use whilst others did not specify any potential use for the land.

2.3 The existing Local Plans also contain a number of undeveloped allocated sites and the Joint Structure Plan for Hull and East Riding (JSP) identifies a number of 'strategic sites'. As such there are a number of existing Local Plan allocations that will need reviewing during the production of this document.

2.4 The Council’s Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA), completed in December 2009 (updated annually), examined the potential of a large number of sites for residential development. The main purpose of the SHLAA is to show we have enough housing sites to be able to plan ahead for 15 years from the expected adoption of the Core Strategy, currently scheduled for January 2012. The sites examined were taken from:

Existing planning permissions; Sites put forward by landowners and developers (land bids); Existing housing allocations without planning permission in the four Local Plans (including sites which have been 'released' under the Council's Managed Release programme and which remain undeveloped at this point); Previously developed (brownfield) sites from the National Land Use Database and the Urban Capacity Study; and Other suitable sites identified where there was a lack of sites submitted by landowners/developers.

2.5 The SHLAA assesses the availability, suitability, and deliverability of sites and, in some instances, discounted sites where there were significant challenges in bringing them forward for development. Information from the SHLAA's site analyses have been included in the schedule of sites information.

2.6 The Town Centres and Retail Study (2009) assessed how well the East Riding’s town centres are performing, their role, retail trends and future retail need. It made recommendations on:

The size of the town centre boundary- where ‘town centre uses’ such as shops, offices and leisure developments should be directed in the first instance; The extent of the primary shopping area- an area where the main retail core is concentrated but is complimented by other uses such as banks, estate agents, cafes and takeaways; The extent of primary shopping frontages- an area designated to contain a high proportion of retail uses (A1 use classes); and Potential sites for future town centre uses- identified as areas where the town centre can expand responding to a need for more floorspace.

These areas are presented within the potential sites plans in Part 2.

8 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

2.7 The Employment Land Review (June 2007) provided recommendations on where there is demand for the retention and allocation of further employment land. It also made recommendations to de-allocate some existing sites within the Local Plans, mainly due to a lack of demand. An Employment Land Review Partial Update (2009) has also been completed, focusing on Haltemprice, Melton and Beverley, and making more detailed recommendations for the location and amount of land required in these areas.

2.8 There are a number of transport schemes arising from the Council’s Second Local Transport Plan (2006 to 2011) (LTP2) such as the Beverley Integrated Transport Plan that require land to be safeguarded from conflicting development. There are other transport schemes where we consider safeguarding land to enable their delivery in the future can be justified. Some of these schemes were included in the Transport DPD Issues and Options (October 2006), and the responses that were made to that document have been taken into account and used to inform the potential transport allocations in this document(1). Any other land use implications arising from the emerging Third Local Transport Plan (LTP3) will also need to be reflected when they become known.

2.9 The 2007-2011 Economic Development Strategy for the East Riding flows directly from the Hull and Ports City Region Development Plan, the Regional Economic Strategy, Regional Rural Strategy and other associated documents. It sets a framework for public and private investment in order expand the area’s economy. Linked to this is an emerging Geographic Programme, which is an action plan containing specific schemes to deliver the strategy. There are a number of schemes in these plans which this DPD needs to take into account.

2.10 An Infrastructure Study is ongoing and is looking at a wide range of infrastructure including highways, public transport, health services, and schools. It will help to identify any shortfalls in provision and once complete, it will recommend what infrastructure is required to deliver the level and distribution of growth envisaged in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy. Additional infrastructure projects may need to be allocated.

2.11 The Council is completing an Open Space Strategy involving a survey of all of the East Riding’s open space including allotments, children’s play space and amenity green space. It will look at the needs for such space and develop local standards for the provision of different types of open space. In areas where the amount of space falls short of this standard, more sites will need to be identified or be required as part of other types of development (for example, housing).

2.12 The Council is completing a Playing Pitch Strategy which will develop local standards for sports pitches based on an audit of playing pitches and will identify demand for additional pitches. In areas where the number of pitches falls short of the standard, more pitches will need to be identified or be required as part of other types of development (for example, housing). The findings and local standards within this strategy will be incorporated into the Open Space Strategy.

2.13 The Council is currently undertaking a Habitat Survey of its area. Sites judged to be of a particularly high value will be identified as Local Wildlife Sites and Local Geological Sites (collectively known as Local Sites) that will need to be shown in this DPD. Ways of linking these sites to national and internationally designated sites and to open space designations to form networks of green infrastructure are also being explored through the Core Strategy.

1 See Transport DPD, Report on Issues and Options Consultation of October/November 2006

9 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

2.14 Various local level Town Plans, Parish Plans, Masterplans and Regeneration Strategies have been produced across the East Riding. Whilst these plans are not part of the formal development plan for the area, they do provide a strong indication as to how these communities want their area to develop. There are various development proposals which originate from these plans with varying degrees of certainty in terms of their deliverability and funding. The proposals which are more likely to come forward have been included as potential sites within this document.

Question 1

Are you aware of any more research/evidence, which could give rise to further sites for consideration within the Allocations DPD?

Where do we need to allocate land?

2.15 The Allocations DPD will allocate land in accordance with the framework set within the Core Strategy. The Preferred Approach Core Strategy - which is the second stage in preparing a Core Strategy - aims to manage the distribution of development throughout the East Riding. It does this by defining a Settlement Network were it is expected that the majority of development will be located (see Figure 2). The network builds upon the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) that identifies some of the larger settlements in the region. Proposed Policy SS2 of the Preferred Approach Core Strategy establishes the following network:

The Major Haltemprice Settlements - (Anlaby, Cottingham, , Kirk Ella, and Willerby) as forming part of the Regional City (as defined in the RSS). Principal Towns - Beverley, Bridlington, , and (as defined in the RSS). Local Service Centres - Elloughton/Brough, , , , , and Rural Service Centres - Aldbrough, , , , Holme on , , Kilham, Leven, Middleton on the Wolds, , , Stamford Bridge and . Supporting Villages - , Easington, Eastrington, Flamborough, Keyingham, Melbourne, Newport, North Cave, Rawcliffe, Roos, Skirlaugh, South Cave and Wilberfoss.

2.16 It follows that the Major Haltemprice Settlements and the Principal Towns should be the main focus of growth. The Local Service Centres, Rural Service Centres and Supporting Villages are expected to provide for more limited development to sustain and meet the needs of rural areas.

2.17 There are also certain uses which will require land outside of the settlement network. These uses relate to land safeguarded for the implementation of transport schemes, rural exception sites for affordable housing, strategic employment areas, community facilities, and leisure and recreation facilities.

2.18 A number of sites brought to our attention have not been set out as potential sites within this document. This includes some sites submitted to us in settlements within the Settlement Network, because:

the development of the site would be directly contrary to national planing policy (e.g. The site is on top of a Scheduled Ancient Monument or entirely within a functional floodplain); and/or

10 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

the site is less than 0.17 hectares or would accommodate fewer than 5 dwellings; and/or the site is completely detached from the settlement.

2.19 Some sites covered in an area of land much greater than the settlement's development needs and have therefore been trimmed down accordingly. In addition, sites in settlements outside of the Settlement Network have not been included as potential sites. See Appendix A for more details.

Figure 2 The Proposed East Riding Settlement Network

How much land do we need to allocate?

Housing

2.20 A key role of the Allocations DPD is to deliver the East Riding’s strategic housing requirements up to 2026. It will therefore allocate a range of sites for housing in and around the towns and villages comprising the Settlement Network.

2.21 Particularly relevant to this DPD is Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) which requires broad locations and specific sites to be identified in order to deliver a continuous 15 year supply of housing. It requires specific deliverable sites to be identified to deliver housing in the first 5 years of the plan period and further specific sites to cover the period to 10 years from adoption. It does not allow windfall sites (unforeseen sites) to be taken into account as part of a calculation for the first 10 years of supply.

2.22 The RSS requires the Council to deliver an average of 1,190 dwellings per year (gross). The total housing requirement for the period 2009/10(2) to 2025/26 is therefore, 20,230 dwellings.

2 data collection and document production began during 2009/10. This was the most up to date information available

11 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

2.23 The approach to the distribution of housing in the East Riding, as set out in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy(3), has been influenced by:

An RSS requirement for around 40% of the East Riding’s housing provision to be located in the Hull housing market area - an area covering the Beverley & Central and Holderness & Southern Coastal sub areas; Affordable housing needs; The need to maintain vibrant rural communities; Economic and regeneration priorities; and Ongoing housing market renewal interventions within the City of Hull.

2.24 The overall amount of land required for housing is influenced by:

The total amount of plots which already have planning permission - 4,738 as of April 2009; The Core Strategy’s preferred housing density policy; (e.g. how many houses should be built on any given area of land) The amount of infrastructure (such as open space, access roads and schools) and facilities required on sites; and Other factors, for example other non housing uses and parking standards.

2.25 The Allocations DPD therefore needs to allocate enough housing land to accommodate approximately 15,492 dwellings (total housing requirement for 2009/10-2025/26 minus the number of plots with planning permission). As an indication of the amount of land required to accommodate this number of dwellings, a density of 30 dwellings per hectare would mean around 516 hectares is required and a density of 50 dwellings per hectare would mean that around 310 hectares is required(4).

2.26 For each of the settlements in the schedules (Chapter 4), an indicative range of land required has been presented. This indicative range has been established upon the amount of development directed to individual settlements in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy.

2.27 The Regional Planning Body (now LGYH) has produced an Overview of Gypsy & Traveller Accommodation Assessments – Yorkshire & The Humber Region in 2008. This looked at accommodation needs for a 10 year period to 2018 extending the East Riding's own assessment by 3 years. The Assessment shows a need to provide 32 residential pitches and 5 transient pitches to 2018 in the East Riding. This consultation deals with potential sites to accommodate housing need in general. Gypsy and traveller sites are incorporated into the potential sites at his stage. Specific sites for gypsies and travellers will be drawn out during the preferred sites consultation to be released early next year.

2.28 Most housing needs for older people will be met through general housing allocations and ensuring a mix of house types. However, there will be a need for specialist care facilities that cannot be met on general housing sites and therefore sites will also be allocated for older people's accommodation (e.g. extra-care facilities). The Council's Older Peoples Housing Strategy is currently under review and will provide details on the amount of accommodation required across the East Riding.

3 Proposed Policies SS4 and SS8-13 4 This is a basic calculation by way of illustration only. The total amount of land required will be subject to a number of site specific issues.

12 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Employment

2.29 It is critical for the Allocations DPD to provide enough employment land in order to allow the East Riding’s economy to grow and to implement the major employment sites set out in Preferred Approach Core Strategy (Proposed Policy SS5). This sets out the amount of employment land required to 2026, based upon the Employment Land Review (2007 and 2009 partial update). In summary, the Employment Land Review recommends:

Allocating at least 270ha of land sufficient to meet forecast demand in the key sectors over the plan period, comprising: 40ha for B1 (predominantly focused in Haltemprice, Beverley, Bridlington and Goole) 50ha for B2 (spread across a range of sites across the East Riding) 100ha for B8 (in locations along the east – west multi modal corridor, e.g. Melton, Newport, Howden and Goole). 80ha at (for Estuary related uses). Retaining flexibility for further long – term allocations at Melton, Carnaby (subject to demand and opportunities to use inter– modal transport) and Goole; De-allocating approximately 150ha of existing allocated employment land in areas which are unlikely to be in demand; and Preparing a criteria-based policy to deal with proposals for employment development on sites in the Rural Service Centres, Supporting Villages and the Countryside.

2.30 Settlement level recommendations of the Employment Land Review included:

The Major Haltemprice Settlements

The primary focus for office development in the East Riding where the bulk of the 40ha of B1 land should be located. Existing and future needs can be met at existing allocated sites, or sites with planning permission. These include: Humber Bridgehead (19.25ha) Priory Park, Hessle (1.47ha) Hessle Dock (3.61ha) Harborlite, Hessle (0.78ha) Willerby Hill (4.16ha); Any allocation/development brought forward should be complementary to the offer within Hull and not competitive. This includes the acknowledgement of Hull and East Riding as a functional employment market; and No further allocations for general or industrial employment land are required.

Principal Towns

At the headline level there is a degree of balance between the supply and demand for general industrial land, although the inclusion of Carnaby within the Bridlington total supply introduces an oversupply situation Beverley: Retain existing allocations and sites with permission. Strong latent demand for offices to be met through proposal at Flemingate. Land at Annie Reed Road and Grovehill Road (approx 9ha) is likely to meet most of Beverley’s immediate needs for B2 uses. The sites may also meet further demand for B1. Small scale opportunities for offices may also be identified in the town centre through the emerging Town Plan; Bridlington: Reduce allocation at Carnaby to approximately 20ha. Retain other existing allocations. Provide 2,000 – 4,000 sq m of office space in the town centre (through the Area Action Plan);

13 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Goole: Retain existing allocations, including 15,000 sq m of office space at J36. Potential longer term need for further land to accommodate warehouse and distribution uses. Should consider protecting such land from alternative uses; and Driffield: Retain existing allocations. Potential to increase allocation if land at Hutton Cranswick is de-allocated.

Towns/Local Service Centres

Howden, Market Weighton and Pocklington: Retain existing allocations; Elloughton/Brough: Re-allocate large 50ha site adjacent to BAE for mixed-use development (this was released at Cabinet in December 2008 for mixed use, predominantly for residential development); Melton [considered with Elloughton/Brough]: Existing allocations to be retained with a primary focus for B2 and B8 uses. Land to the south of the train line could be identified with longer term potential to make use of the multi-modal transport links if either or both of the rail link and jetty could be delivered; and Hedon, Hornsea, Snaith, Withernsea: De-allocate due to limited market appeal. The existing allocation at Hedon Haven should be retained for estuary related.

Rural Areas

Land at Hutton Cranswick could be retained or alternatively could be re-distributed to nearby Driffield [Note that land at Hutton Cranswick has largely been taken up through planning permissions]; Newport has an important role on the Humber Trade Zone/M62 and should be retained; and Existing allocations at Aldborough, Brandesburton, Burstwick, Catfoss, , Holme on Spalding Moor, Nafferton, Pollington, Paull and Thorngumbald should be considered for de-allocation. These total 36.6ha.

Retail

2.31 The Allocations DPD should provide for the East Riding’s need for shops and services to 2026. This is necessary not only for developing the East Riding economy and serving the needs of residents, but also to enable the regeneration of some of our towns.

2.32 The Town Centres and Retail Study (February 2009 and updated 2010) assesses the need for retail development to 2026 by looking at the future expenditure capacity available in the area. It then converts the expenditure capacity into an upper and lower floorspace capacity, and the amount of land that may be required to deliver the capacity. The floorspace capacity of each centre is set out in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy (Proposed Policy SS6) and presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Retail requirements and recommendations

Centre Floorspace Capacity to Land Requirement Development 2026 (gross sqm) (hectares) Opportunities

Lower Upper Lower Upper

Beverley 6,500 17,000 0.7 1.7 Expand

Bridlington 17,000 33,900 1.7 3.4 Expand

14 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Ell’ton/Brough 170 470 - - Consolidate

Cottingham 210 420 - - Consolidate

Driffield 1,200 2,300 0.1 0.2 Expand

Goole 1,700 3,400 0.2 0.3 Expand

Hedon 70 140 - - Intensify

Hessle - - - - Consolidate

Hornsea - - - - Intensify

Howden 90 180 - - Consolidate

Market Weighton 590 1,180 0.1 0.1 Expand

Pocklington 550 1,100 0.1 0.1 Consolidate

Withernsea 610 1,230 0.1 0.1 Expand

East Riding 28,690 61,320 3.0 5.9 N/A Total

Transport

2.33 The role of the Allocations DPD in relation to transport is to safeguard land required to deliver new or improved transport infrastructure e.g. roads. This infrastructure is needed to deliver the Second Local Transport Plan’s four shared priorities - tackling congestion, delivering accessibility, safer roads, and better air quality - as well as deliver the emerging approach of the Third Local Transport Plan. It is also needed to help deliver the spatial distribution of development set out in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy.

2.34 All the schemes set out below are included in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy (Proposed Policy SS7 and Sub-area policies SS8-13), which aims to facilitate and safeguard their delivery. Where detailed scheme designs are known, their location is shown on the site plans in Part 2. The specific transport schemes are:

The Beverley Integrated Transport Plan: construction of a new southern relief road; provision of a park and ride facility with a dedicated bus link into the town centre; and other junction improvements; The A164between Beverley and the Humber Bridge: route improvements including partial duelling; reconfiguration of five roundabouts to increase their capacity; and provision of a continuous cycle track along the route; The A1079 between and Hull: consideration of new roundabouts; and other improvements along the route; The Brough Relief Road: continuation of the Road southwards over the railway line (via a bridge) ; The Beverley to York railway route: land will need to be safeguarded for both the line and possible station locations in and around the major settlements along the route. Away from the major settlements sufficient protection is afforded to the route by a restriction on development to that which is appropriate in the ‘open countryside’;

15 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Park and ride sites to serve Hull: two potential sites north of Hull; and one site west of Hedon; and Hull Docks branch line: extension of railway line to the proposed employment allocation at Hedon Haven.

2.35 There are a number of other sites needed for accommodating rail links and inter-modal freight transfer terminals next to employment land. Safeguarding these sites would retain the possibility for using the adjacent rail lines for freight movements. The specific sites and proposals are:

Carnaby industrial estate - rail link to the proposed allocated employment area; Melton mulit-modal transfer (former cement works).

2.36 In addition there are a number of wharfs which should be safeguarded for the potential role they could play in achieving modal-shift from road to water modes for freight transport. Such facilities can also help reduce carbon emissions and road congestion. The specific sites are:

Aire and Calder Canal

New Bridge Wharf (north side of canal, adjacent to the A614) Glucose Wharf (north side of canal, west of Rawcliffe Bridge) Croda Wharf (north side of canal, east of Rawcliffe Bridge) Linpac Wharf (north side of canal, east of Rawcliffe Bridge) M.O.D. Wharf (north side of canal, east of Rawcliffe Bridge) Tilcon Wharf (south side of canal, east of Goole railway bridge)

River Ouse

Howdendyke- three wharves (north side of river)

River Humber

Melton (Brickyard Lane)

Education

2.37 When planning its education provision, the Council uses pupil projections as a way of predicting future demand for school places. These projections take into account birth rates, inward migration and new housing developments.(5).

2.38 Before looking at allocating new sites for education, existing unimplemented sites allocated for education in the Local Plans will be reviewed to establish whether they are still required. An Infrastructure Study is also underway, which will establish whether any additional land is required for educational use. The results of this will be set out in the Preferred Sites consultation on this DPD.

5 There are also a number of independent schools serving the East Riding, including Hull Collegiate, Hymers College (Hull), St Mary’s (Hull), Trinity House (Hull) and Pocklington School. The Council does not need to provide spaces for pupils who will attend these schools. However, many Hull children are pupils in East Riding’s schools, mainly in secondary schools in the Major Haltemprice Settlements.

16 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Health

2.39 NHS East Riding of Yorkshire is carrying out an ongoing review of its services in the East Riding. The review has involved the investigation of redevelopment or extension of a number of existing health facilities, and in some cases closing existing facilities and relocating services to redeveloped or completely new sites.

2.40 Some of the major proposals include:

Beverley- new Community Hospital development including a 30 bed ward, x-ray, therapies, dental, GP facilities, and social services Hornsea- re-develop Hornsea Cottage Hospital site to provide modern facilities (possible inclusion of a nursing home). Withernsea- major refurbishment of community hospital

2.41 Increasingly, the aim is to combine a number of services on single sites as a means of making more efficient use of facilities and provision of more convenient services. Services that could be combined on to one site include: minor surgery, GP facilities, dental practice, therapies and social services. New/redeveloped multi-purpose facilities are planned in the following areas:

Pocklington- practice development (specific site unknown at this stage) Driffield- a facility off Lockwood Street to transfer services from the Bridge Street GP Practice. Beverley- extension to Samman Road GP facilities HMP Everthorpe- health centre Cottingham- practice development (specific site unknown at this stage) Willerby- practice development (specific site unknown at this stage) Anlaby- practice development (specific site unknown at this stage) North Ferriby- GP facilities (specific site unknown at this stage)

2.42 The Infrastructure Study is also looking at this issue. The results of this will be set out in the Preferred Sites consultation on this DPD.

Leisure

2.43 The Council has recently carried out an extensive review of its leisure facilities culminating in the refurbishment and/or extension of many of its centres. A proposal still to be implemented is the possible re-development of Bridlington’s Leisure World site. The planning implications of this are to be taken forward through the Bridlington Town Centre Area Action Plan. The Infrastructure Study is also looking at this issue, and the results of this will be set out in the Preferred Sites consultation on this DPD.

Open space

2.44 Open space includes parks and greens, natural and semi-natural green spaces, green corridors, outdoor sports facilities, amenity green space, provision for children and young people, allotments, cemeteries, churchyards, burial grounds and civic and market squares.

2.45 Designations for open space are not shown at the Potential Sites stage, but will be shown as part of the Preferred Sites consultation. That way, feedback can be sought on existing and proposed open space against need generated by preferred housing, retail, and employment

17 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

sites as established using local open space standards (being developed in the Open Space Strategy). However, where a potential site allocation in this document would result in the loss of an existing area of open space, this is clearly indicated in the site schedules in section 4. What are the considerations for allocating land?

General site considerations

2.46 The Preferred Approach Core Strategy sets the strategic framework for the location of development. Below this framework there are a wide range of site-specific factors, which contribute to a site’s overall suitability for development. They are shown in Figure 3 and some of the key issues for site allocation are set out below.

Figure 3 What would make a good site allocation?

PHYSICALOR IMPACTON ENVIRONMENTAL EXISTINGORNEW CONSIDERATIONS FACILITIES ANDSERVICES i Historicassets iContaminatedland hShops iFloodrisk hBusservices iNature hSchools TRANSPORT conservation SITE LINKS habitat AVAILABILITY constraints hCycleroutes hOwnership hWalkingroutes constraints hPublictransportlinks h Existinguses hHighwayaccess onsite WHATWOULD MAKE A GOOD SITE ALLOCATION? EFFICIENTUSE DEVELOPMENTNEEDS? OFLAND h i Evidencebase Inexistinguse h i Recentdevelopment Previously insettlement developed EXISTING IMPACT h i Levelandqualityof Vacant INFRA- OF facilities STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY ON AMENITYOF EXISTING COMMUNITIES hRoads h PublicTransport hCompatibility h Schools& ofuses s OtherFacilitie hTraffic hNoise

Risk of flooding

2.47 One of the most important considerations in determining which sites to allocate is the risk of flooding. A key tool in considering flood risk is the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). This has collated all known sources of flooding including tidal, river, surface water and groundwater, in order to identify the probability of flooding in an area. It recommends appropriate land uses in flood affected areas that would not unduly place people or property at risk of flooding. Where flood risk has been identified as a potential constraint on development, possible flood mitigation measures to minimise the risk to property and life have been recommended.

18 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

2.48 The SFRA will be used to guide a sequential approach in allocating sites for development. The approach seeks to ensure that sites for development are allocated in areas of the lowest flood risk in the first instance.

2.49 The East Riding’s proposed approach on the application of the sequential test is set out in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy (Proposed Policy HQE6).

Mixed-use development

2.50 National policy encourages mixed-use developments and multi-purpose uses of sites, thus reducing the need to travel. Many of the larger sites included within this document may be developed for a mix of uses since the development of larger sites for one particular use (e.g. housing) in itself generates a demand for other uses (e.g. shops, doctors surgeries, open space). Therefore there are many sites presented within this document that are suitable for more than one predominant use.

Housing considerations

2.51 National policy, Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3), has a number of key ambitions:

Achieve high quality housing which delivers a mix of both market and affordable housing to support a wide variety of households Require need and demand for housing to be taken into account as well as to improve choice Locate housing in suitable locations with a range of community facilities and good access to jobs, services, and infrastructure. Deliver a flexible, responsive supply of land that makes efficient and effective use of land reflecting plan, monitor, manage principles

2.52 Affordable housing will be required on most housing sites allocated through this DPD. An Affordable Housing Viability Assessment is currently underway which will inform how much affordable housing should be provided on sites over a certain size/threshold. The threshold will be set through policy HBHM2 of the Core Strategy, this will be consulted separately once the AHVA has been completed.

2.53 PPS3 encourages the allocation and release of small sites solely for affordable housing in rural communities, that would normally not be used for housing. We are considering the allocation of such Rural Exception Sites through this DPD (see ). The Preferred Approach Core Strategy (Policy HBHM2) proposes such sites adjacent to Rural Service Centres and Supporting Villages, or within or adjacent to other rural settlements, with a preference to larger settlements. As mentioned in paragraph 2.18, some potential housing sites have not been considered in this document. Some of these discounted sites may be suitable as rural exception sites, or there may be other sites that come forward as a result of this consultation which are suitable.

2.54 The Preferred Approach Core Strategy also sets out potential policies on:

the mix of house types, provision of gypsy and traveller accommodation, density standards, and a target for 35% of housing to be built on brownfield land (previously-developed land).

These requirements will need to be considered in the process of allocating sites.

19 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Employment land considerations

2.55 National Policy (Planning Policy Statement 4: Planning for Sustainable Economic Development (PPS4)) encourages local authorities to identify a good range of sites for economic and mixed use development, provide a good supply of land and buildings, avoid adverse impacts on the environment, and promote sustainable travel choices. It seeks the most efficient and effective use of land and buildings and states that existing allocations should not necessarily be carried forward where this cannot be justified. In respect of proposals for town centre uses, such as retail, offices and leisure, PPS4 directs this type of development to town centres in the first instance before identifying land in out-of-centre locations.

2.56 The proposed policies in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy draw on the findings of the Employment Land Review and consider the amount of land to allocate (Proposed Policy SS5) and set out criteria for assessing employment proposals in rural areas (Proposed Policy PE2). An approach to the retention of rural buildings for employment use and rural diversification schemes is also set out.

Retail considerations

2.57 In order to review existing town centre boundaries and assess potential development opportunities, the Town Centres and Retail Study considered existing proposals, vacant or under-developed sites, and the potential to redevelop and reconfigure existing sites. It classified the centres into one of four categories in terms their potential future development:

Physically Expand- these centres have the potential to physically expand outside of their existing Local Plan boundaries. Intensify- centres where sites have been identified within the existing boundaries which have the potential to be redeveloped or reconfigured in order to intensify the level of current town centre uses. Rationalise- where changes have taken place to decrease the size of the centre. The boundary should be reduced to reflect these changes. (none of the East Riding centres are given this classification) Consolidate- centres proposed to continue as they are due to there being no potential for physical expansion, and other constraints meaning that intensification is unlikely to be achievable.

2.58 The classifications for each centre in the East Riding is set out in Table 1. The proposed size and layout of the town centre boundary, primary retail area, primary retail frontage, and potential sites for town centre uses, are shown in Part 2.

Deliverability

2.59 We will only allocate sites that we expect to be delivered over the plan period. The deliverability of a piece of land will depend on its:

Availability- when the site can be developed; Suitability- whether it is suitable for the land use proposed. For example if housing is proposed, the land would need to be within or well related to a settlement identified in the Core Strategy; and Achievability- the prospect of development taking place on the site.

20 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

2.60 This is a critical aspect for production of this DPD. If the allocated sites in the adopted document are not deliverable, they are unlikely to come forward when they are needed, and hence not contribute to delivering the approach and meeting the development needs set out in the Core Strategy.

Sustainability Appraisal

2.61 The results of Sustainability Appraisal (SA) carried out at the different stages in preparing the Allocations DPD will be an important consideration. Sites allocated against the advice of the SA will need strong justification and evidence to back up the alternative approach. The schedules of sites in Chapter 4 of this document give an initial indication of the social, economic and environmental considerations for each site. A final SASAM, referred to in paragraph 1.8, will be used to carry out the SA of the Allocations DPD.

Question 2

Are there any other significant site considerations, not listed here or in the draft Sustainability Appraisal Site Assessment Methodology (SASAM), that we should take into account in deciding which sites to allocate in this DPD?

21 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

22 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

3 Potential Sites for Allocation

East Riding of Yorkshire Council 23 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

The potential sites plans

3.1 Part 2 of this document contains a series of plans showing the sites that are being consulted on as potential allocations. Each plan is accompanied by a schedule, providing basic details of each site (these are set out in Chapter 4 of this document). Plans and schedules have been prepared for each settlement identified in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy and for other areas where development is proposed (such as employment sites away from the main settlements).

3.2 In some instances we have sought to combine sites into more logical parcels of land, which represent different choices as to how a settlement or area could develop. However, this does not necessary mean that the preferred allocations will follow these boundaries. For example, it may be that only part of a site is allocated if the other part is constrained in some way.

3.3 The environmental constraints of high flood risk, functional floodplain, scheduled ancient monuments (SAMs) and principal nature conservation interests have been included on the maps. The principal nature conservation constraints include Special Protection Areas (SPA), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)(6), Ramsar sites, Sites of Special Scientific Importance (SSSI) and Sites of Nature Conservation Importance (SNCI)(7).

3.4 Land required for the future implementation of some major transport schemes has also been included where it can be shown with a reasonable degree of accuracy. The primary shopping frontage, primary shopping area, and town centre boundary designations have been shown as an indication of where retail uses will be prioritised. Detailed inset maps for each centre are also provided in Part 2.

3.5 Current development limits established through the Local Plans have been shown. Updated development limits taking into account the preferred site allocations will be presented for consideration in the next consultation stage of the DPD. The schedule of sites

3.6 The schedules are arranged by settlement. At the top of each schedule we have provided an indication as to how much land will be required for housing based on the approach set out in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy.(8) The schedules include a site reference and details of the address, area and the existing land use. We also include how we became aware of the land in question (e.g. through a land bid). We have suggested potential suitable uses for each site based on their location and other characteristics, as well as from information provided as part of the land bid, where relevant. At this stage we are still open to suggestions for their potential use.

3.7 The 'key comments' column states relevant and significant planning and environmental considerations for each site. A 'deliverability' column outlines a rough timescale over which the site could come forward based on ownership, physical limitations or constraints and the amount of time likely to be taken to develop the site in full. Much of the information relating to the deliverability of sites for residential uses is taken from the SHLAA. Not all sites would be needed at the same time, so the Allocations DPD will need to set out indicative timescales for the release of sites. The exact timing of site releases for housing will be determined by a plan, monitor, manage approach using up to date evidence base documents, such as the annual review of the SHLAA.

6 They also include candidate SACs (cSAC) and potential SPAs (pSPA) 7 SNCIs are also referred to as Sites of Important Nature Conservation (SINCs) in some cases 8 This is a basic calculation by way of illustration only. The total amount of land required will be subject to a number of site specific issues.

24 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

3.8 Prior to undertaking a SA (as part of the Preferred Sites stage), we have outlined the sustainability factors of each of the sites. Three columns have been included in the schedules looking at the environmental, social and economic credentials of each site.

3.9 Table 2 provides details on some of the information we have included in each of the schedules. It also sets out where we obtained much of the information from (in brackets), which involved a mixture of site visits, reference to Geographic Information Systems (GIS - a form of electronic mapping) and the Evidence Base.

Table 2 Information contained within the schedules

Field Considerations (Sources)

Site Ref/Address/ (Land bid information, GIS) Area

Existing use (GIS, Aerial photographs )

Why included (Land Bid, Local Plan allocation/designation, SHLAA, National Land Use Database, Local regeneration document)

Potential use (Land bid, evidence base, Local Plan allocation/designation)

Key comments Are there any national or regional policy constraints? (Various sources – see below) Are there any key local policy issues? (Various sources – see below)

Environmental What is the level of flood risk? (GIS – Environment Agency data) factors Are there any tree preservation orders on the site? (GIS – ERYC Development Management data) What is the grade of agricultural land quality? (GIS – Agricultural Land Classification Data) Is the site within a groundwater source protection zone? (GIS - Environment Agency data) What is the assessed quality of the landscape and the landscape’s sensitivity to development? (Landscape Character Assessment) What it the approximate Greenfield/Brownfield proportion (GIS, aerial photographs) Is the site potentially contaminated? (GIS – ERYC Environmental Health data) Is there a SAC/SPA/Ramsar designation on or adjacent to the site? (GIS – Environmental designation data) Is there a SSSI/NNR designation on or adjacent to the site? (GIS – Environmental designation data) Is there a SINC designation on or adjacent to the site? (GIS, Local Plan maps) Is the site designated as an open area within a Local Plan? (Local Plan maps) Does the site lie in or adjacent to a Conservation Area? (GIS – ERYC Development Management data) Would the development of the site affect any listed buildings or Scheduled Ancient Monuments? (GIS – Monument records data)

Social factors Is the site close to local services and facilities? (GIS, Town Centres and Retail Study)

25 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

How would the development of the site affect the form of the settlement – e.g. extension into open countryside? (GIS) Would the site involve the redevelopment of existing building? What is there current use and what is there state of repair? (GIS, Aerial photographs)

Deliverability Are there any known ownership constraints? (Land bids, SHLAA) Are there any known physical limitations or constraints? E.g. Access (GIS, SHLAA, Local knowledge) How long would it take to develop the site? 0-5 years, 0-10 years,0-15 years (SHLAA, Local knowledge)

The status of sites presented in this document

3.10 All the sites presented within this document are for consultation purposes only and should not be regarded as being approved allocations. They are, therefore, not a material consideration for development management decisions. A large number of sites have been included so that people can have their say on all the possible site options available. The fact that a site has been included within this document as a potential allocation is no guarantee that it will eventually become an allocation as part of the final adopted document. The aim of this document is to test how appropriate these potential sites are through consultation.

3.11 This Potential Sites document will not supersede the site allocations and policies in the four ‘saved’ Local Plans and the Joint Structure Plan which will continue to be the basis for development management decisions. Responding to the sites included on the maps

3.12 We would like as many people as possible to have their say on the sites set out within this document. In particular we are seeking your views on the questions set out below. In answering the questions, please state clearly the potential allocation site reference(s) to which your responses relate.

Question 3

Do you have any comments on the potential allocations shown on the plans and described in the schedule? In particular,

a. Is the potential allocation suitable for development? If so, what uses could it be developed for? If not, why is it unsuitable? b. Are there any sites that should be a priority for development?

Question 4 Are there any other sites, not considered so far within this document, that should also be considered as potential allocations?

Question 5

Do you have any comments on the proposed primary shopping frontages, primary shopping areas or town centre boundaries as shown on the town centre inset maps?

26 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Question 6

Do you have any views on the proposed land to be safeguarded for transport schemes as shown on the potential sites plans?

27 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

28 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

4 Schedule of Sites

East Riding of Yorkshire Council 29 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

30 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Appendix A

East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

Appendix A - Sites not considered as Potential Sites

A1 A number of sites brought to our attention have not been set out as potential sites within this document. This includes some sites submitted to us in settlements within the Settlement Network (see Figure 2), because:

the development of the site would be directly contrary to national planing policy (e.g. The site is on top of a Scheduled Ancient Monument or entirely within a functional floodplain); and/or the site is less than 0.17 hectares or would accommodate fewer than 5 dwellings; and/or the site is completely detached from the settlement.

A2 In addition, the settlements listed in Figure A1 have not been identified as a location for new market housing or employment allocations in the Preferred Approach Core Strategy.

A3 Therefore, all land bids for such proposals in these settlements have not been considered at this stage. However, some types of development will still be considered within or adjacent to these settlements in accordance with proposed policy SS3 of the Preferred Approach Core Strategy, including:

Affordable housing for local people; Small-scale employment including expansions of existing businesses and rural diversification proposals; Conversion of buildings for economic development, tourism or community uses; and Small-scale housing, usually involving infill, conversion, or the re-use of previously developed land, and where it provides for an identified local need.

A4 In locations outside of settlements, some land bids have been submitted for uses such as tourism or recreation. We are not proposing to allocate specific sites for these uses in the countryside, but policies within the Preferred Approach Core Strategy allow for such schemes to be considered - e.g. proposed policy PE3 - Developing and diversifying the visitor economy.

Affordable housing - Rural Exception Sites

A5 We are seeking to deliver more affordable housing throughout the East Riding. In proposed policy HBHM2 of the Preferred Approach Core Strategy, we set out our intentions to allocate (and allow) Rural Exception Sites for affordable housing to meet the high level of identified need.

A6 Rural Exception Sites are sites that provide 100% affordable housing and can be within or adjacent to a rural settlement. The definition of ‘affordable housing’ is:

Affordable housing includes social rented and intermediate housing, provided to specified eligible households whose needs are not met by the market. Affordable housing should: Meet the needs of eligible households including availability at a cost low enough for them to afford, determined with regard to local incomes and local house prices; and Include provision for the home to remain at an affordable price for future eligible households or, if these restrictions are lifted, for the subsidy to be recycled for alternative affordable housing provision.

A7 The settlements listed in Figure A1, particularly the larger settlements and where there is a high level of local need, may be suitable to allocate Rural Exception Sites.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document

A8 We would like to know if you have a site which would be suitable for 100% affordable housing which we can consider through the Allocations DPD. You can submit land bids to us at the contact details below. This can be a simple letter stating that you would like your site to be considered for affordable housing. Please include the site address and a map of suitable scale showing its location.

Forward Planning, East Riding of Yorkshire Council, Room FS32, County Hall, Beverley, East Yorkshire, HU17 9BA

[email protected] Potential

East Figure A1 Settlements not considered for new market housing or employment land allocations Riding Aike East Newton Sites Airmyn Bielby Burton Constable Eastburn Fraisthorpe of

Allerthorpe (1) Bilton Burton Fleming Easthorpe Fridaythorpe Consultation Yorkshire Arnold Bishop Burton Ellerker Full Sutton Arram Camerton Ellerton Ganstead Carnaby (3) Elmswell Gardham Council Atwick Bolton Catfoss Elstronwick Garton - Aughton Boynton Allocations Bainton Brantingham Cawkeld Eppleworth Balkholme Breighton Eske Goodmanham Barmby Moor (2) Brigham Coniston Etton Goole Fields Development Barmby on the Marsh Brind Cottam Everingham Gowdall Barmston Broad Ings Cowlam Everthorpe Baswick Broomfleet Fangfoss Goxhill Bellasize Buckton Drewton Gransmoor Belthorpe Fimber Great Cowden Plan

Bempton Burnby Dunnington Fitling Great Givendale Document Bentley Bursea Dunswell Flinton Burshill East Cottingwith Great Kelk Beswick Burstwick East Cowick Fordon Great Kendale

(1) Potential site POC16 (Pocklington Industrial Estate) is within Allerthorpe parish (2) Potential site POC15 (Pocklington Industrial Estate) is within Barmby Moor parish (3) Sites within and adjacent to Carnaby Industrial Estate have been included for potential employment use. Howdendyke Little Driffield Nafferton Painsthorpe Grimston Huggate Little Hatfield Neswick Patrington Haven Grindale Little Humber New Ellerby Paull (6) Gunby Kelleythorpe Little Kelk Newsholme Pockthorpe Haisthorpe Kilnsea Little Reedness Newton upon Derwent Pollington Halsham Kilnwick North Cliffe Portington Harlthorpe Kilnwick Percy Lockington North Dalton Preston (7) Londesborough North Ferriby Rascal Moor Harswell Kilpin Pike Long Riston Rawcliffe Bridge

Hayton North Newbald Rawcliffe Station Potential Lowthorpe Nunburnholme Reedness High Catton Knedlington Lund

High Hunsley Land of Nod Octon Riplingham Sites Hilderthorpe Langtoft Marton (Bridlington) Old Ellerby Risby Hilston Laxton Marton (Burton Constable) Rise Consultation Hollym Laytham Meaux Oubrough Rolston Holme on the Wolds Leconfield (4) Melton (5) Ousefleet Rossmoor Holmpton Meltonby Out Newton -

Hook Lissett Millington Routh Allocations Hotham Little Catwick Moor End Owthorne Rowley

(4) The Defence School of Transport site is identified as a site for military training (Potential site LAF1).

(5) Potential Sites south of the A63 have been considered for employment uses. Development (6) An existing employment allocation at Hedon Haven is reconsidered as a potential site (Potential site HAV1). (7) A number of potential sites considered for Hedon and Salt End are within the parish of Preston Plan Document Potential East Rudston Skirpenbeck Thornton (Blacktoft) Waxholme Yapham

Riding Rudston Parva Thornton (nr Melbourne) Weel Yokefleet Ryehill South Cliffe Thorpe Weeton Youlthorpe Sites of Saltmarshe South Dalton Thorpe le Street Welhambridge Consultation Yorkshire Sancton South Newbald Throlam Welton (9) Sand Hole Southburn Thwing Welwick Sandholme Tibthorpe West Cowick

Council Scamland Spittal West Ella -

Scorborough Tollingham West Newton Allocations Seaton Storwood Towthorpe Whitedale Seaton Ross Sunk Island Tunstall Whitgift Sewerby Sutton upon Derwent Ulrome Wilfholme Shiptonthorpe Swanland Uncleby Development Swine Upton Wilsthorpe Skeffling Walkington (8) Winestead Skelton Thearne Wansford Withernwick

Skerne Thirtleby Warter Wold Newton Plan Skidby Thorney Crofts Water End Document Thorngumbald Watton Thornholme Wyton

(8) Potential Site BEV1 is within the parish of Walkington. (9) A number of sites in Welton parish have been considered as part of Elloughton-cum-Brough (ECB5-7) and the Melton industrial area has been considered separately.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council will, on request, provide this document in Braille, audio or large print format.

If English is not your first language and you would like a translation of this document in any of the following ten languages, please telephone:-

Should you require the document to be translated into any other language, please telephone 01482-393939

County Hall, Beverley