Hyperbolic Cosines and Sines Theorems for the Triangle Formed by Arcs of Intersecting Semicircles on Euclidean Plane

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hyperbolic Cosines and Sines Theorems for the Triangle Formed by Arcs of Intersecting Semicircles on Euclidean Plane Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Mathematics Volume 2013, Article ID 920528, 10 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/920528 Research Article Hyperbolic Cosines and Sines Theorems for the Triangle Formed by Arcs of Intersecting Semicircles on Euclidean Plane Robert M. Yamaleev1,2 1 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Laboratory of Information Technology, Street Joliot Curie 6, CP 141980, P.O. Box 141980, Dubna, Russia 2 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Facultad de Estudios Superiores, Avenida 1 Mayo, 54740 Cuautitlan´ Izcalli, MEX, Mexico Correspondence should be addressed to Robert M. Yamaleev; [email protected] Received 17 December 2012; Accepted 21 February 2013 Academic Editor: Sujit Samanta Copyright © 2013 Robert M. Yamaleev. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The hyperbolic cosines and sines theorems for the curvilinear triangle bounded by circular arcs of three intersecting circles are formulated and proved by using the general complex calculus. The method is based on a key formula establishing a relationship between exponential function and the cross-ratio. The proofs are carried out on Euclidean plane. 1. Introduction laws of sines-cosines for that triangle are proved by using properties of the Mobius¨ group and the upper half-plane . Classically, the models of the hyperbolic plane are regarded In this paper we suggest another way of construction of as based on Euclidean geometry. One starts with a piece of a proofs of the sines-cosines theorems of the Poincaremodel.´ Euclidean plane, a half-plane, or a circular disk and then, in The curvilinear triangle formed by circular arcs is the figure that half-plane or disk the notions of points, lines, distances, of the Euclidean plane; consequently, on the Euclidean plane angles are defined as things that could be described in terms we have to find relationships antecedent to the sines-cosines of Euclidean geometry [1–3]. The model of the hyperbolic plane is the half-plane model. The underlying space of this hyperbolic laws. Therefore, first of all, we establish these model is the upper half-plane model in the complex plane relationships by making use of axioms of the Euclidean plane, ,definedtobe only. Secondly, we proove that these relationships can be formulated as the hyperbolic sine-cosine theorems. For that ={∈:Im () >0} . (1) purpose we refer to the general complex calculus and within its framework establish a relationship between exponential (, ) In coordinates thelineelementisdefinedas function and the cross-ratio. In this way the hyperbolic 1 trigonometry emerges on Euclidean plane in a natural way. 2 = (2 +2). 2 (2) The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 akey formula connecting the hyperbolic calculus with the cross- The geodesics of this space are semicircles centered on the - ratio is established. By employing the key formula and the axis and vertical half-lines. The geometrical properties of the Pythagoras theorem the elements of the right-angled triangle figures on the half-plane are studied by considering quantities are expressed as functions of the hyperbolic trigonometry. In invariant under an action of the general Mobius¨ group,which Section 3 we explore Euclidian properties of the curvilinear consists of compositions of Mobius¨ transformations and triangle bounded by circular arcs of three intersecting semi- reflections [4]. The curvilinear triangle formed by circular circles. Two main relationships connecting three intersecting arcs of three intersecting semicircles is one of the principal semicircles are established. In Section 4,weprovethetheo- figures of the upper half-plane model . The hyperbolic rem of cosines for the curvilinear triangle bounded by the 2 Journal of Mathematics 1 This formula we denominate as the key formula and use it 2 in order to introduce hyperbolic trigonometry on Euclidean II(a) plane. Notice that the argument of the exponential function is proportional to the difference between the numerator and the denominator, 1 −2 =1 −2, and this difference does not depend on the parameter . 2.2. Elements of Right-Angled Triangle as Functions of a Hyper- Figure 1: Motion of the hypothenuse of the right angled triangle. bolic Trigonometry. Let bearight-angledtrianglewith right angle at . Denote the sides by ,,thehypotenuseby , and the angles opposite to , , by , , , correspondingly. circular arcs. In Section 5, the hyperbolic law of sines and Traditionally interrelations between angles and sides of a second hyperbolic law of cosines are derived on the basis of triangle are described by the trigonometry via periodical the main relationships between these semicircles. sine-cosine functions. The periodical functions of the circular angles are defined via the ratios 2. Hyperbolic Trigonometry in sin = , tan = . (10) Euclidean Geometry 2.1. Trigonometry Induced by General Complex Algebra. The Notice that these two ratios are functions of the same angle simplest generalization of the complex algebra, denominated .Onmakinguseofformula(9)weareabletointroducethe as General Complex Algebra, is defined by unique generator e hyperbolic trigonometry besides the circular trigonometry. satisfying the quadratic equation [5] Define the following relationships: + e2 −e + =0, = (2) . 1 0 (3) − exp (11) where coefficients 0,1 are given by real positive numbers 2 From this equation it follows that and −40 >0. 1 The following Euler formula holds true: = () , = () . tanh sinh (12) exp (e) =0 () + e1 () . (4) In this way we arrive to the following interrelations between Denote by 1,2 ∈rootsofthequadraticequation(3). circular and hyperbolic functions: The Euler formula (4) is decomposed into two independent 1 equations: cos = = tanh () , tan = = . (13) sinh () exp () =0 () +1 () , =1,2, (5) Now let us introduce the following geometrical motion; namely, change position of the point along the line from which one may find explicit formulae for -functions. These functions are linear combinations of the exponential (see, Figure 1). Then, the sides and will change while the side will not change. Since the length is a constant of this functions exp(), =1,2. Geometrical interpretation of the general complex algebra is done in [6]. evolution, in agreement with key formula (9)werewrite(11) Form the following ratio as follows: + = exp (2) , (14) 2 −() − exp ((2 −1))= , (6) 1 −() that is, the argument of exponential function is proportional = where to : ,where is a parameter of the evolution. Formulae in (13) are rewritten as 0 () ()=− . (7) 1 1 () cos = = tanh () , tan = = . (15) sinh () Introduce a pair of variables 1, 2 by From these formulas it is derived that () = −(), =1,2. (8) cot =sinh () , (16) Then, (6) is written as follows: or, () (( − ))= 2 . exp 2 1 (9) tan = exp (−) . (17) 1 () 2 Journal of Mathematics 3 2 1 1 2 1 2 Figure 2: Semicircle and lines tangent to the semicircle. Install the triangle in such a way that the side = In this way, we have established connection of formula (17) lies on the line ,andtheside=is perpendicular to with the main formula of hyperbolic geometry (19). this line at the point In Figure 1 the line movesinsuchawaythatcutsline 2.3. Rotational Motion of a Line Tangent to the Semicircle. The at points , , , and so forth. Now, let us recall the concept of the circular angle in Euclidean plane is intimately problemofparallellinesingeometry[7]. Let the ray tend relatedtothefigureofacircleandtomotionofapointalong to a definite limiting position; in Figure 1 this position is given the circumference. The hyperbolic angle is also related to the by line 1.Asthepoint moves along line away from point circle because of a motion along the circumference coherence there are two possibilities to consider. with the motion along the hyperbola [9]. C (1) In Euclidean geometry, the angle between lines 1 and Consider semicircle (Figure 2) with end-points and is equal to right angle. the center on -axis. Denote by the center and by 1, 2 the end-points of the semicircle. Through end-points of the (2) The hypothesis of hyperbolic geometry is that this semicircle, 1, 2 erect the lines parallel to vertical axis, - angleislessthantherightangle. axis. Draw a line tangent to the semicircle at the point ; The most fundamental formula of the hyperbolic geom- this line crosses -axis at the point and intersects with the Π() etry is the formula connecting the angle of parallelism vertical lines at points 1 and 2. Draw a line parallel to -axis and the length of the perpendicular from the given point from the center which crosses C at the top point . to the given line. In order to establish those relationships Denote by radius of the circle, so that ==and the concept of horocycles, some circles with center and axis =12.Denoteby the angle ∠.Thetriangle at infinity, was introduced [8]. The great theorem which is a right triangle, so that enables one to introduce the circular functions, sines, and ()2 − ()2 =2. cosinesofanangleisthatthegeometryofshortestlines (21) (horocycles) traced on horosphere is the same as plane Consider rotational motion of the line tangent to the semi- Euclidean geometry. The function connecting the angle of circle at the point C.InFigure 2,twopositionsofthislineare parallelism with the distance is given by given by lines 2 and 1. When the point runs from Π () end point 1 to the top-point ,thepoint runs along - (− )= . (18) exp tan 2 axis from point 1 to infinity. During this motion the triangle K =1/ formed by the line tangent to the semicircle, the -axis and Now, we introduce the value inverse to by and the radius of the circle remains to be right angled. This is rewrite (17)intheform exactly the case considered in Section 2.2,consequently,we can apply formula (13). According to (13)wewrite exp (− )=tan . (19) K 2 = coth () = ,1 = =tan . Let the point run away from the point to infinity. The cos sinh () following two cases can be considered.
Recommended publications
  • Einstein's Velocity Addition Law and Its Hyperbolic Geometry
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Computers and Mathematics with Applications 53 (2007) 1228–1250 www.elsevier.com/locate/camwa Einstein’s velocity addition law and its hyperbolic geometry Abraham A. Ungar∗ Department of Mathematics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA Received 6 March 2006; accepted 19 May 2006 Abstract Following a brief review of the history of the link between Einstein’s velocity addition law of special relativity and the hyperbolic geometry of Bolyai and Lobachevski, we employ the binary operation of Einstein’s velocity addition to introduce into hyperbolic geometry the concepts of vectors, angles and trigonometry. In full analogy with Euclidean geometry, we show in this article that the introduction of these concepts into hyperbolic geometry leads to hyperbolic vector spaces. The latter, in turn, form the setting for hyperbolic geometry just as vector spaces form the setting for Euclidean geometry. c 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Special relativity; Einstein’s velocity addition law; Thomas precession; Hyperbolic geometry; Hyperbolic trigonometry 1. Introduction The hyperbolic law of cosines is nearly a century old result that has sprung from the soil of Einstein’s velocity addition law that Einstein introduced in his 1905 paper [1,2] that founded the special theory of relativity. It was established by Sommerfeld (1868–1951) in 1909 [3] in terms of hyperbolic trigonometric functions as a consequence of Einstein’s velocity addition of relativistically admissible velocities. Soon after, Varicakˇ (1865–1942) established in 1912 [4] the interpretation of Sommerfeld’s consequence in the hyperbolic geometry of Bolyai and Lobachevski.
    [Show full text]
  • Old-Fashioned Relativity & Relativistic Space-Time Coordinates
    Relativistic Coordinates-Classic Approach 4.A.1 Appendix 4.A Relativistic Space-time Coordinates The nature of space-time coordinate transformation will be described here using a fictional spaceship traveling at half the speed of light past two lighthouses. In Fig. 4.A.1 the ship is just passing the Main Lighthouse as it blinks in response to a signal from the North lighthouse located at one light second (about 186,000 miles or EXACTLY 299,792,458 meters) above Main. (Such exactitude is the result of 1970-80 work by Ken Evenson's lab at NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder) and adopted by International Standards Committee in 1984.) Now the speed of light c is a constant by civil law as well as physical law! This came about because time and frequency measurement became so much more precise than distance measurement that it was decided to define the meter in terms of c. Fig. 4.A.1 Ship passing Main Lighthouse as it blinks at t=0. This arrangement is a simplified model for a 1Hz laser resonator. The two lighthouses use each other to maintain a strict one-second time period between blinks. And, strict it must be to do relativistic timing. (Even stricter than NIST is the universal agency BIGANN or Bureau of Intergalactic Aids to Navigation at Night.) The simulations shown here are done using RelativIt. Relativistic Coordinates-Classic Approach 4.A.2 Fig. 4.A.2 Main and North Lighthouses blink each other at precisely t=1. At p recisel y t=1 sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbolic Trigonometry in Two-Dimensional Space-Time Geometry
    Hyperbolic trigonometry in two-dimensional space-time geometry F. Catoni, R. Cannata, V. Catoni, P. Zampetti ENEA; Centro Ricerche Casaccia; Via Anguillarese, 301; 00060 S.Maria di Galeria; Roma; Italy January 22, 2003 Summary.- By analogy with complex numbers, a system of hyperbolic numbers can be intro- duced in the same way: z = x + hy; h2 = 1 x, y R . As complex numbers are linked to the { ∈ } Euclidean geometry, so this system of numbers is linked to the pseudo-Euclidean plane geometry (space-time geometry). In this paper we will show how this system of numbers allows, by means of a Cartesian representa- tion, an operative definition of hyperbolic functions using the invariance respect to special relativity Lorentz group. From this definition, by using elementary mathematics and an Euclidean approach, it is straightforward to formalise the pseudo-Euclidean trigonometry in the Cartesian plane with the same coherence as the Euclidean trigonometry. PACS 03 30 - Special Relativity PACS 02.20. Hj - Classical groups and Geometries 1 Introduction Complex numbers are strictly related to the Euclidean geometry: indeed their invariant (the module) arXiv:math-ph/0508011v1 3 Aug 2005 is the same as the Pythagoric distance (Euclidean invariant) and their unimodular multiplicative group is the Euclidean rotation group. It is well known that these properties allow to use complex numbers for representing plane vectors. In the same way hyperbolic numbers, an extension of complex numbers [1, 2] defined as z = x + hy; h2 =1 x, y R , { ∈ } are strictly related to space-time geometry [2, 3, 4]. Indeed their square module given by1 z 2 = 2 2 | | zz˜ x y is the Lorentz invariant of two dimensional special relativity, and their unimodular multiplicative≡ − group is the special relativity Lorentz group [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbolic Geometry
    Flavors of Geometry MSRI Publications Volume 31,1997 Hyperbolic Geometry JAMES W. CANNON, WILLIAM J. FLOYD, RICHARD KENYON, AND WALTER R. PARRY Contents 1. Introduction 59 2. The Origins of Hyperbolic Geometry 60 3. Why Call it Hyperbolic Geometry? 63 4. Understanding the One-Dimensional Case 65 5. Generalizing to Higher Dimensions 67 6. Rudiments of Riemannian Geometry 68 7. Five Models of Hyperbolic Space 69 8. Stereographic Projection 72 9. Geodesics 77 10. Isometries and Distances in the Hyperboloid Model 80 11. The Space at Infinity 84 12. The Geometric Classification of Isometries 84 13. Curious Facts about Hyperbolic Space 86 14. The Sixth Model 95 15. Why Study Hyperbolic Geometry? 98 16. When Does a Manifold Have a Hyperbolic Structure? 103 17. How to Get Analytic Coordinates at Infinity? 106 References 108 Index 110 1. Introduction Hyperbolic geometry was created in the first half of the nineteenth century in the midst of attempts to understand Euclid’s axiomatic basis for geometry. It is one type of non-Euclidean geometry, that is, a geometry that discards one of Euclid’s axioms. Einstein and Minkowski found in non-Euclidean geometry a This work was supported in part by The Geometry Center, University of Minnesota, an STC funded by NSF, DOE, and Minnesota Technology, Inc., by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, and by NSF research grants. 59 60 J. W. CANNON, W. J. FLOYD, R. KENYON, AND W. R. PARRY geometric basis for the understanding of physical time and space. In the early part of the twentieth century every serious student of mathematics and physics studied non-Euclidean geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Differentials to Differentiate Trigonometric and Exponential Functions Tevian Dray
    Using Differentials to Differentiate Trigonometric and Exponential Functions Tevian Dray Tevian Dray ([email protected]) received his B.S. in mathematics from MIT in 1976, his Ph.D. in mathematics from Berkeley in 1981, spent several years as a physics postdoc, and is now a professor of mathematics at Oregon State University. A Fellow of the American Physical Society for his early work in general relativity, his current research interests include the octonions as well as science education. He directs the Vector Calculus Bridge Project. (http://www.math.oregonstate.edu/bridge) Differentiating a polynomial is easy. To differentiate u2 with respect to u, start by computing d.u2/ D .u C du/2 − u2 D 2u du C du2; and then dropping the last term, an operation that can be justified in terms of limits. Differential notation, in general, can be regarded as a shorthand for a formal limit argument. Still more informally, one can argue that du is small compared to u, so that the last term can be ignored at the level of approximation needed. After dropping du2 and dividing by du, one obtains the derivative, namely d.u2/=du D 2u. Even if one regards this process as merely a heuristic procedure, it is a good one, as it always gives the correct answer for a polynomial. (Physicists are particularly good at knowing what approximations are appropriate in a given physical context. A physicist might describe du as being much smaller than the scale imposed by the physical situation, but not so small that quantum mechanics matters.) However, this procedure does not suffice for trigonometric functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheryl Jaeger Balm Hyperbolic Function Project
    Math 43 Fall 2016 Instructor: Cheryl Jaeger Balm Hyperbolic Function Project Circles are part of a family of curves called conics. The various conic sections can be derived by slicing a plane through a double cone. A hyperbola is a conic with two basic forms: y y 4 4 2 2 • (0; 1) (−1; 0) (1; 0) • • x x -4 -2 2 4 -4 -2 2 4 (0; −1) • -2 -2 -4 -4 x2 − y2 = 1 y2 − x2 = 1 x2 − y2 = 1 is the unit hyperbola. Hyperbolic Functions: Similar to how the trigonometric functions, cosine and sine, correspond to the x and y values of the unit circle (x2 + y2 = 1), there are hyperbolic functions, hyperbolic cosine (cosh) and hyperbolic sine (sinh), which correspond to the x and y values of the right side of the unit hyperbola (x2 − y2 = 1). y y -1 1 x x π π 3π 2π π π 3π 2π 2 2 2 2 -1 -1 cos x sin x y y 6 2 4 x 2 -2 2 • (0; 1) -2 x -2 2 cosh x sinh x Hyperbolic Angle: Just like how the argument for the trigonometric functions is an angle, the argument for the hyperbolic functions is something called a hyperbolic angle. Instead of being defined by arc length, the hyperbolic angle is defined by area. If that seems confusing, consider the area of the circular sector of the unit circle. The r2θ equation for the area of a circular sector is Area = 2 , so because the radius of the unit circle is 1, any sector of the unit circle will have an area equal to half of the sector's central θ angle, A = 2 .
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbolic Geometry
    Flavors of Geometry MSRI Publications Volume 31, 1997 Hyperbolic Geometry JAMES W. CANNON, WILLIAM J. FLOYD, RICHARD KENYON, AND WALTER R. PARRY Contents 1. Introduction 59 2. The Origins of Hyperbolic Geometry 60 3. Why Call it Hyperbolic Geometry? 63 4. Understanding the One-Dimensional Case 65 5. Generalizing to Higher Dimensions 67 6. Rudiments of Riemannian Geometry 68 7. Five Models of Hyperbolic Space 69 8. Stereographic Projection 72 9. Geodesics 77 10. Isometries and Distances in the Hyperboloid Model 80 11. The Space at Infinity 84 12. The Geometric Classification of Isometries 84 13. Curious Facts about Hyperbolic Space 86 14. The Sixth Model 95 15. Why Study Hyperbolic Geometry? 98 16. When Does a Manifold Have a Hyperbolic Structure? 103 17. How to Get Analytic Coordinates at Infinity? 106 References 108 Index 110 1. Introduction Hyperbolic geometry was created in the first half of the nineteenth century in the midst of attempts to understand Euclid’s axiomatic basis for geometry. It is one type of non-Euclidean geometry, that is, a geometry that discards one of Euclid’s axioms. Einstein and Minkowski found in non-Euclidean geometry a ThisworkwassupportedinpartbyTheGeometryCenter,UniversityofMinnesota,anSTC funded by NSF, DOE, and Minnesota Technology, Inc., by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, and by NSF research grants. 59 60 J. W. CANNON, W. J. FLOYD, R. KENYON, AND W. R. PARRY geometric basis for the understanding of physical time and space. In the early part of the twentieth century every serious student of mathematics and physics studied non-Euclidean geometry. This has not been true of the mathematicians and physicists of our generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Differentials to Differentiate Trigonometric and Exponential Functions
    Using differentials to differentiate trigonometric and exponential functions Tevian Dray Department of Mathematics Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 [email protected] 3 April 2012 Differentiating a polynomial is easy. To differentiate u2 with respect to u, start by computing d(u2)=(u + du)2 − u2 = 2u du + du2 then dropping the last term, an operation that can be justified in terms of limits. Differential notation, in general, can be regarded as a shorthand for a formal limit argument. Still more informally, one can argue that du is small compared to u, so that the last term can be ignored at the level of approximation needed. After dropping du2 and dividing by du, one obtains the derivative, namely d(u2)/du = 2u. Even if one regards this process as merely a heuristic procedure, it is a good one, as it always gives the correct answer for a polynomial. (Physicists are particularly good at knowing what approximations are appropriate in a given physical context. A physicist might describe du as being much smaller than the scale imposed by the physical situation, but not so small that quantum mechanics matters.) However, this procedure does not suffice for trigonometric functions. For example, we may write d(sin θ) = sin(θ + dθ) − sin θ = sin θ cos(dθ) − 1 + cos θ sin(dθ), ³ ´ 1 but to go further we must know something about sin θ and cos θ for small values of θ. Exponential functions offer a similar challenge, since d(eβ)= eβ+dβ − eβ = eβ(edβ − 1), and again we need additional information, in this case about eβ for small values of β.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geometric Introduction to Spacetime and Special Relativity
    A GEOMETRIC INTRODUCTION TO SPACETIME AND SPECIAL RELATIVITY. WILLIAM K. ZIEMER Abstract. A narrative of special relativity meant for graduate students in mathematics or physics. The presentation builds upon the geometry of space- time; not the explicit axioms of Einstein, which are consequences of the geom- etry. 1. Introduction Einstein was deeply intuitive, and used many thought experiments to derive the behavior of relativity. Most introductions to special relativity follow this path; taking the reader down the same road Einstein travelled, using his axioms and modifying Newtonian physics. The problem with this approach is that the reader falls into the same pits that Einstein fell into. There is a large difference in the way Einstein approached relativity in 1905 versus 1912. I will use the 1912 version, a geometric spacetime approach, where the differences between Newtonian physics and relativity are encoded into the geometry of how space and time are modeled. I believe that understanding the differences in the underlying geometries gives a more direct path to understanding relativity. Comparing Newtonian physics with relativity (the physics of Einstein), there is essentially one difference in their basic axioms, but they have far-reaching im- plications in how the theories describe the rules by which the world works. The difference is the treatment of time. The question, \Which is farther away from you: a ball 1 foot away from your hand right now, or a ball that is in your hand 1 minute from now?" has no answer in Newtonian physics, since there is no mechanism for contrasting spatial distance with temporal distance.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hyperbolic Geometry
    1 Hyperbolic Geometry The purpose of this chapter is to give a bare bones introduction to hyperbolic geometry. Most of material in this chapter can be found in a variety of sources, for example: Alan Beardon’s book, The Geometry of Discrete Groups, • Bill Thurston’s book, The Geometry and Topology of Three Manifolds, • Svetlana Katok’s book, Fuchsian Groups, • John Ratcliffe’s book, Hyperbolic Geometry. • The first 2 sections of this chapter might not look like geometry at all, but they turn out to be very important for the subject. 1.1 Linear Fractional Transformations Suppose that a b A = c d isa2 2 matrix with complex number entries and determinant 1. The set of × these matrices is denoted by SL2(C). In fact, this set forms a group under matrix multiplication. The matrix A defines a complex linear fractional transformation az + b T (z)= . A cz + d We will sometimes omit the word complex from the name, though we will always have in mind a complex linear fractional transformation when we say linear fractional transformation. Such maps are also called M¨obius transfor- mations, Note that the denominator of T (z) is nonzero as long as z = d/c. It is A 6 − convenient to introduce an extra point and define TA( d/c) = . This definition is a natural one because of the∞ limit − ∞ lim TA(z) = . z d/c →− | | ∞ 1 The determinant condition guarantees that a( d/c)+ b = 0, which explains − 6 why the above limit works. We define TA( ) = a/c. This makes sense because of the limit ∞ lim TA(z)= a/c.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Started with the CORDIC Accelerator Using Stm32cubeg4 MCU Package
    AN5325 Application note Getting started with the CORDIC accelerator using STM32CubeG4 MCU Package Introduction This document applies to STM32CubeG4 MCU Package, for use with STM32G4 Series microcontrollers. The CORDIC is a hardware accelerator designed to speed up the calculation of certain mathematical functions, notably trigonometric and hyperbolic, compared to a software implementation. The accelerator is particularly useful in motor control and related applications, where algorithms require frequent and rapid conversions between rectangular (x, y) and angular (amplitude, phase) co-ordinates. This application note describes how the CORDIC accelerator works on STM32G4 Series microcontrollers, its capabilities and limitations, and evaluates the speed of execution for certain calculations compared with equivalent software implementations. The example code to accompany this application note is included in the STM32CubeG4 MCU Package available on www.st.com. The examples run on the NUCLEO-G474RE board. AN5325 - Rev 2 - March 2021 www.st.com For further information contact your local STMicroelectronics sales office. AN5325 General information 1 General information The STM32CubeG4 MCU Package runs on STM32G4 Series microncontrollers, based on Arm® Cortex®-M4 processors. Note: Arm is a registered trademark of Arm Limited (or its subsidiaries) in the US and/or elsewhere. AN5325 - Rev 2 page 2/20 AN5325 CORDIC introduction 2 CORDIC introduction The CORDIC (coordinate rotation digital computer) is a low-cost successive approximation algorithm for evaluating trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Originally presented by Jack Volder in 1959, it was widely used in early calculators. In trigonometric (circular) mode, the sine and cosine of an angle are determined by rotating the vector [0.61, 0] through decreasing angles tan-1(2-n) (n = 0, 1, 2,...) until the cumulative sum of the rotation angles equals the input angle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hyperbolic Number Plane
    The Hyperbolic Number Plane Garret Sobczyk Universidad de las Americas email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION. The complex numbers were grudgingly accepted by Renaissance mathematicians because of their utility in solving the cubic equation.1 Whereas the complex numbers were discovered primar- ily for algebraic reasons, they take on geometric significance when they are used to name points in the plane. The complex number system is at the heart of complex analysis and has enjoyed more than 150 years of intensive development, finding applications in diverse areas of science and engineering. At the beginning of the Twentieth Century, Albert Einstein developed his theory of special relativity, built upon Lorentzian geometry, yet at the end of the century almost all high school and undergraduate students are still taught only Euclidean geometry. At least part of the reason for this state of affairs has been the lack of a simple mathematical formalism in which the basic ideas can be expressed. I argue that the hyperbolic numbers, blood relatives of the popular complex numbers, deserve to become a part of the undergraduate math- ematics curriculum. They serve not only to put Lorentzian geometry on an equal mathematical footing with Euclidean geometry; their study also helps students develop algebraic skills and concepts necessary in higher mathematics. I have been teaching the hyperbolic number plane to my linear algebra and calculus students and have enjoyed an enthusiastic response. THE HYPERBOLIC NUMBERS. The real number system can be extended in a new way. Whereas the algebraic equation x2 − 1 = 0 has the real number solutions x = ±1, we assume the existence of a new number, the unipotent u, which has the algebraic property that u 6= ±1 but u2 = 1.
    [Show full text]