DOCSLIB.ORG

Youth Victimization Helping Those Who Help Others

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Youth Victimization Helping Those Who Help Others The National RESOURCE CENTER for REACHING VICTIMS Youth Victimization Helping those who help others Children are the most victimized segment of the population. They are victims of the same crimes as adults but are particularly vulnerable to certain types, such as neglect and psychological abuse.1 Childhood victimization increases the likelihood an individual will be a victim again, as well as experience multiple types of victimization. This trend is most associated with mental health problems and bad outcomes.2 Crime Trends Overall from 1995 to 2017, the rate of violent victimization for those age 12-17 decreased from 156 to 34 violent victimizations per 1,000 adolescents.3 However, from 2016-2017, there was a significant increase in adolescent violent victimization, from 25.1 reports per 1,000 to 33.4 reports per 1,000; this represents a 34% increase from year to year.3 Youth most frequently reported neglect and physical abuse; a small percentage of victims experienced “other” maltreatment, such as threatened abuse or neglect, drug/alcohol addiction, and lack of supervision.4 Violent Victimization Rates Child Maltreatment by Type National Crime Victimization Survey National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System 2016 175 150 Neglect 74.8% 125 Physical Abuse 18.2% 100 Sexual 8.5% Abuse 75 Other 6.9% te per 1,000 50 Ra Psychological 5.6% 25 Maltreatment Medical 2.1% 0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Neglect 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Age 12-17 Age 12 or older Percentage of Victims Age 0-17 Did You Know? • In 2016, an estimated 1,750 children died as a result of abuse or neglect; 70% of these victims were younger than 3 years old.4 • In 2016, about 61% of youth victims received post-victimization response services from a CPS agency.4 • Both official and self-report data sources point to substantial declines in child victimization since the 1990s.1, 2 2019 1 Current Data on Child Victimization The youngest children are the most vulnerable; in 2016, 28.5% of child victims were younger than 3 years of age. Children younger than 1 year were the most frequently victimized; this age group was 2.5x more likely to be victimized than any other age group. Rates of child victimization were similar for both boys (48.6%) and girls (51.0%), with gender unknown for 0.4%.4 In 2016, the majority of perpetrators were a parent of their victim. More than half (53.7%) of perpetrators were women, 45.3% were men, and 1% were of an unknown gender.4 In 2016, the rate of victimization among black and American Indian/Alaska Native youth was more than 8x that of Asian youth, and more than 1.2x greater than youth of any other race or ethnicity.4 Perpetrator’s Relationship to Victim Child Victims of Abuse/Neglect by Race and Ethnicity National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System 2016 National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System 2016 Other Black 13.9 Multiple Nonrelative American Relationships 6% 4% Unknown Indian/ 14.2 2% Alaska Native Unmarried Partner Asian 1.6 of Parent 4% Hispanic 8 Multiple 11.2 Race Other Pacific Relative Islander 8.6 6% Parent 78% White 8.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Rate per 1,000 Youth (of Same Race/Ethnicity) Age 0-17 Limitations Combined with strict guidelines regarding data collection from minors, researchers often struggle to gather comprehensive data on child victimization. Much of the available data in this report is considered to be an underestimate of the true prevalence of child victimization and should be interpreted with caution.1 SOURCES 1. Finkelhor, D. (2011). “Prevalence of Child Victimization, Abuse, Crime, and Violence Exposure” in J.W. White, M.P. Koss, and A.E. Kazdin (Eds.), Violence Against Women and Children: Mapping the Terrain (pp. 9-26). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 2. David Finkelhor et al., National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence (2015), “Prevalence of Childhood Exposure to Violence, Crime, and Abuse,” http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2344705 3. Morgan, R.E. & Truman, J. L. (December 2018). Criminal Victimization, 2017 (Publication No. NCJ 252-472). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv17.pdf 4. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2018). Child maltreatment 2016. Retrieved from https://acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm2016.pdf 2019 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention
    Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention Compiled by: Amanda B. Nickerson, Ph.D. | Director Heather Cosgrove | Graduate Assistant Rebecca E. Ligman, M.S.Ed. | Program and Operations Manager June 2012 The Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention will reduce bullying abuse in schools and in the community by contributing knowledge and providing evidence-based tools to effectively change the language, attitudes, and behaviors of educators, parents, students, and society. Amanda B. Nickerson, Ph.D. | Director Rebecca E. Ligman, M.S.Ed. | Program and Operations Manager Heather Cosgrove | Graduate Assistant Michelle Serwacki | Graduate Assistant Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention Graduate School of Education University at Buffalo, The State University of New York 428 Baldy Hall Buffalo, NY 14260-1000 P: (716) 645-1532 F: (716) 645-6616 [email protected] gse.buffalo.edu/alberticenter We extend our sincere gratitude to the many groups and individuals who gave their time, energy, and valuable input during this needs assessment process. We thank the National Federation for Just Communities of Western New York, Western New York Educational Services Council, and the Western New York School Psychologist Association for allowing us to obtain feedback from their conference participants. Laura Anderson, Ph.D., Janice DeLucia- Waack, Ph.D., Jennifer Livingston, Ph.D., Amy Reynolds, Ph.D., and Michelle Serwacki, B.A., were helpful in facilitating the focus groups at the WNYESC conference. Several directors and associate directors of similar centers also generously gave of their time to be interviewed, including: Kristin Christodulu, Ph.D.; Michael Furlong, Ph.D.; Lynn Gelzheiser, Ed.D.; Linda Kanan, Ph.D.; Betsey Schühle, M.S.; Susan Swearer, Ph.D.; and Frank Vellutino, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Review of Academic Bullying in Medical Settings: Dynamics and Consequences
    Open access Original research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043256 on 12 July 2021. Downloaded from Systematic review of academic bullying in medical settings: dynamics and consequences Tauben Averbuch ,1 Yousif Eliya,2 Harriette Gillian Christine Van Spall1,2,3 To cite: Averbuch T, Eliya Y, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Van Spall HGC. Systematic Purpose To characterise the dynamics and consequences review of academic bullying of bullying in academic medical settings, report factors in medical settings: dynamics ► This systematic review is comprehensive, including that promote academic bullying and describe potential and consequences. BMJ Open 68 studies with 82 349 consultants and trainees, 2021;11:e043256. doi:10.1136/ interventions. across several countries and including all levels of bmjopen-2020-043256 Design Systematic review. training. We searched EMBASE and PsycINFO for Data sources ► We defined inclusion criteria a priori and used es- ► Prepublication history and articles published between 1 January 1999 and 7 February additional supplemental material tablished tools to assess the risk of bias of included for this paper are available 2021. studies. online. To view these files, Study selection We included studies conducted in ► The included studies varied in their definitions of please visit the journal online academic medical settings in which victims were bullying, sampling bias was noted among the sur- (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ consultants or trainees. Studies had to describe bullying veys and intervention studies were suboptimally bmjopen- 2020- 043256). behaviours; the perpetrators or victims; barriers or designed. facilitators; impact or interventions. Data were assessed Received 29 July 2020 independently by two reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfopposition to SB 78 A00994 2021-06-21.Pdf
    MEMORANDUM Date: June 21, 2021 To: Members, Pennsylvania General Assembly From: Frank P. Cervone, Executive Director, Support Center for Child Advocates Kathleen Creamer, Managing Attorney, Family Advocacy Unit Community Legal Services Terry Fromson, Managing Attorney, Women’s Law Project Elizabeth Randol, Legislative Director, ACLU of Pennsylvania RE: Senate Bill 78 (PN 65) – Kayden’s Law FRIENDS – We have only today learned that Senate Bill 78 may be moving in the PA Senate this week, and so we wanted to respond to recent points made by the bill’s sponsors. We continue to urge that the legislation will work to the detriment of the well-being of children involved in custody disputes. I expect there will be other voices joining in opposition, but because there is some urgency to legislative deliberations we are providing this memorandum now. Primarily, we again urge restraint and caution. Meaningful custody law reform that helps and does not hurt is best done in a deliberative process that balances competing needs and considerations. Interposing the discretion of legislators into complex child custody proceedings, and ignoring the insights and experiences of family court practitioners and judges, remains as problematic today as it did when this initiative was started by a tragic event and a passionate campaign. The course of this drafting process has been frustrating and disappointing. We have made repeated outreach to the lead sponsors throughout this legislative term, without response. None of the interested advocacy organizations even saw Amendment A00994 until after noon today! While we previously met extensively more than one year ago, there was no movement on the substantial problems we have raised, and instead persistent intransigence on key problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders of Protection and the Battered Women Syndrome Sheila M
    Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 23 Issue 3 Spring 1992 Illinois Judicial Conference Article 3 Symposium 1992 Orders of Protection and the Battered Women Syndrome Sheila M. Murphy Honorable Assoc. Judge, Circuit Court of Cook County, IL Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj Part of the Law and Gender Commons Recommended Citation Sheila M. MurphyHonorable, Orders of Protection and the Battered Women Syndrome, 23 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 397 (1992). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol23/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Orders of Protection and the Battered Woman Syndrome Honorable Sheila M. Murphy* Violence in the home strikes at the heart of our society. Chil- dren who are abused or who live in homes where parents are battered carry the terrible lessons of violence with them into adulthood.... To tolerate family violence is to allow the seeds of violence to be sown into the next generation. We as a nation can no longer allow these victims to suffer alone. We must understand the breadth and scope of the prob- lem. We must admit that family violence is found at every level of the social structure. We must let victims know that they need not hesitate to seek help. We must listen with an understanding heart and we must act in ways which prevent, protect and sup- port.
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect
    STATE STATUTES Current Through March 2019 WHAT’S INSIDE Defining child abuse or Definitions of Child neglect in State law Abuse and Neglect Standards for reporting Child abuse and neglect are defined by Federal Persons responsible for the child and State laws. At the State level, child abuse and neglect may be defined in both civil and criminal Exceptions statutes. This publication presents civil definitions that determine the grounds for intervention by Summaries of State laws State child protective agencies.1 At the Federal level, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment To find statute information for a Act (CAPTA) has defined child abuse and neglect particular State, as "any recent act or failure to act on the part go to of a parent or caregiver that results in death, https://www.childwelfare. serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, gov/topics/systemwide/ or exploitation, or an act or failure to act that laws-policies/state/. presents an imminent risk of serious harm."2 1 States also may define child abuse and neglect in criminal statutes. These definitions provide the grounds for the arrest and prosecution of the offenders. 2 CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-320), 42 U.S.C. § 5101, Note (§ 3). Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect https://www.childwelfare.gov CAPTA defines sexual abuse as follows: and neglect in statute.5 States recognize the different types of abuse in their definitions, including physical abuse, The employment, use, persuasion, inducement, neglect, sexual abuse, and emotional abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Abuse/Neglect
    Wisconsin Child Welfare PDS Mandated Reporter Training Threatened Abuse/Neglect There is no statutory definition for the phrase “threatened with abuse or neglect”, so common- sense definitions are applied. “Threatened abuse and neglect” refers to behaviors or conditions the child is exposed to that are dangerous to the child and likely to result in abuse or neglect. Remember when we were defining physical abuse - the example of the man beating his wife while their toddler hangs on to her leg? If the child is injured, it is physical abuse. If the child is not injured, it is threatened abuse, as a reasonable person could predict such behavior could result in serious injury to the child. Threatened abuse or neglect also includes instances when someone verbally threatens to injure a child, if you believe he or she is serious about carrying out the threat. Is threatened abuse or neglect less serious than actual abuse or neglect? Threatened abuse or neglect can be very serious. If a report includes information that indicates a vulnerable child is in immediate danger, CPS and law enforcement respond very quickly. The purpose of giving CPS and law enforcement agencies the authority to intervene in cases of threatened abuse or neglect is to prevent serious harm to a child, whenever possible. What are some situations you may come across that are not threatened maltreatment? Here are two examples: Verbal “threats”, such as “You know, sometimes I could just throttle that kid”, where it is clear someone is just making an exaggerated comment and has no intention whatsoever of following through.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Our Educational Booklet
    COMPASS CHANGE THE JOIN THE HAVE THE CONVERSATION CONVERSATION CONVERSATION Spreading facts to change Leadership stepping Empowering victims of sexual the stereotypes about rape up to put an end to violence to heal through open and sexual violence sexual violence discussion Sojourner House is the domestic violence shelter in Mahoning County, shelters over 100 families each year that are survivors of domestic violence providing a safe, violent-free environment to heal and chart a new course. Services are free of charge. WHAT IS SEXUAL VIOLENCE? Sexual violence is whenever sexuality is used as a weapon to gain power or control over someone. UNWANTED CHILD SEXUAL TRAFFICKING HARASSMENT CONTACT ABUSE DOMESTIC INCEST STALKING RAPE VIOLENCE WHAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT? Sexual Assault is any forced or coerced sexual activity such as unwanted contact, committed against a person’s will or without consent. Rape is a sexual assault that includes but is not limited to forced vaginal, anal, and oral penetration. Rape and sexual assault are crimes of violence with sex used as a weapon that can be committed by strangers, teens, friends, relatives, men, women, dates, partners, lovers, and spouses. WHAT IS CONSENT? WHAT IS COERCION? Consent is a verbal, physical and emotional Coercion is used in an attempt to pressure a agreement that is clear, mutual and ongoing. person to do something they might not want to do. • Consent can only exist when there is equal • Flattery, guilt trips, intimidation or threats are used power and no pressure between partners. to manipulate a person’s choices. • Consent for some things does not mean • Even if someone gives in to coercion, it is NOT consent for all things.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing Child Abuse: What Parents Should Know
    Prevent Child Abuse America 500 North Michigan Avenue Suite 200 Chicago, IL 60611.3703 312.663.3520 tel 312.939.8962 fax www.preventchildabuse.org Recognizing Child Abuse: What Parents Should Know The first step in helping abused children is learning to recognize the symptoms of child abuse. Although child abuse is divided into four types -- physical abuse, neglect, sexual abuse, and emotional maltreatment -- the types are more typically found in combination than alone. A physically abused child for example is often emotionally maltreated as well, and a sexually abused child may be also neglected. Any child at any age may experience any of the types of child abuse. Children over age five are more likely to be physically abused and to suffer moderate injury than are children under age five. 1. Recognizing Child Abuse 2. Signs of Physical Abuse 3. Signs of Neglect 4. Signs of Sexual Abuse 5. Signs of Emotional Maltreatment RECOGNIZING CHILD ABUSE Experienced educators likely have seen all forms of child abuse at one time or another. They are alert to signs like these that may signal the presence of child abuse. The Child: • Shows sudden changes in behavior or school performance; • Has not received help for physical or medical problems brought to the parents' attention; • Has learning problems that cannot be attributed to specific physical or psychological causes; • Is always watchful, as though preparing for something bad to happen; • Lacks adult supervision; • Is overly compliant, an overachiever, or too responsible; or • Comes to school early, stays late, and does not want to go home.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sociology of Gaslighting
    ASRXXX10.1177/0003122419874843American Sociological ReviewSweet 874843research-article2019 American Sociological Review 2019, Vol. 84(5) 851 –875 The Sociology of Gaslighting © American Sociological Association 2019 https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419874843DOI: 10.1177/0003122419874843 journals.sagepub.com/home/asr Paige L. Sweeta Abstract Gaslighting—a type of psychological abuse aimed at making victims seem or feel “crazy,” creating a “surreal” interpersonal environment—has captured public attention. Despite the popularity of the term, sociologists have ignored gaslighting, leaving it to be theorized by psychologists. However, this article argues that gaslighting is primarily a sociological rather than a psychological phenomenon. Gaslighting should be understood as rooted in social inequalities, including gender, and executed in power-laden intimate relationships. The theory developed here argues that gaslighting is consequential when perpetrators mobilize gender- based stereotypes and structural and institutional inequalities against victims to manipulate their realities. Using domestic violence as a strategic case study to identify the mechanisms via which gaslighting operates, I reveal how abusers mobilize gendered stereotypes; structural vulnerabilities related to race, nationality, and sexuality; and institutional inequalities against victims to erode their realities. These tactics are gendered in that they rely on the association of femininity with irrationality. Gaslighting offers an opportunity for sociologists to theorize under-recognized,
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics About Sexual Violence
    National Sexual Violence Resource Center z Info & Stats For Journalists Statistics about sexual violence Sexual violence in the U.S. y 81% of women and 35% of men report significant short-term or long-term impacts such as Post- y One in five women and one in 71 men will be raped Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a) at some point in their lives (a) y Health care is 16% higher for women who were y 46.4% lesbians, 74.9% bisexual women and 43.3% sexually abused as children (m) heterosexual women reported sexual violence other than rape during their lifetimes, while 40.2% gay Child sexual abuse men, 47.4% bisexual men and 20.8% heterosexual men reported sexual violence other than rape during y One in four girls and one in six boys will be sexually their lifetimes. (p) abused before they turn 18 years old (f) y Nearly one in 10 women has been raped by an y 34% of people who sexually abuse a child are family intimate partner in her lifetime, including completed members (n) forced penetration, attempted forced penetration y 12.3% of women were age 10 or younger at the time or alcohol/drug-facilitated completed penetration. of their first rape/victimization, and 30% of women Approximately one in 45 men has been made to were between the ages of 11 and 17 (a) penetrate an intimate partner during his lifetime. (b) y 27.8% of men were age 10 or younger at the time y 91% of the victims of rape and sexual assault are of their first rape/victimization (a) female, and 9% are male (o) y More than one-third of women who report being raped y In eight out of 10 cases of rape, the victim knew the before age 18 also experience rape as an adult (a) person who sexually assaulted them (l) y 96% of people who sexually abuse children are y 8% of rapes occur while the victim is at work (e) male, and 76.8% of people who sexually abuse children are adults (n) Cost and Impact y 325,000 children are at risk of becoming victims of y Each rape costs approximately $151,423 (d) commercial child sexual exploitation each year (m) y Annually, rape costs the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • On Not Blaming and Victim Blaming
    teorema Vol. XXXIX/3, 2020, pp. 95-128 ISSN: 0210-1602 [BIBLID 0210-1602 (2020) 39:3; pp. 95-128] On Not Blaming and Victim Blaming Joel Chow Ken Q and Robert H. Wallace RESUMEN En este artículo se muestra que ser culpable por acusar a una víctima es estructu- ralmente similar a ser culpable por no acusar. Ambos fenómenos se ajustan a los perfiles tradicionales de la responsabilidad moral: la condición de conocimiento y la condición de control. Pero lo interesante es que en ellos conocimiento y control son condiciones in- terdependientes. Al tener una relación con otra persona se dispone de distintos grados de conocimiento sobre ella. A su vez, este conocimiento proporciona distintos grados de in- fluencia mutua a los sujetos de la relación. Ejemplos en los que alguien es especialmente culpable por no acusar a un amigo, a un colega cercano o a un cónyuge así lo atestiguan. La interdependencia de estas dos condiciones en las relaciones interpersonales aclara (parcialmente) por qué es moralmente malo acusar a una víctima. Se argumenta que los que acusan a las víctimas padecen una forma de miopía moral al fijarse únicamente en lo que la víctima podría hacer, por el hecho de tener algún tipo de relación con el causante del abuso, para evitar este. De manera particular, se atiende a los casos en los que la mio- pía moral se alimenta de relatos y esquemas de género jerárquicos y misóginos. PALABRAS CLAVE: responsabilidad moral, ética de la acusación, acusación a las víctimas, normas, misoginia. ABSTRACT In this paper we show that being blameworthy for not blaming and being blame- worthy for victim blaming are structurally similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Battered Woman Syndrome: Institutionalization of Negative Stereotypes About Women
    UCLA UCLA Women's Law Journal Title Current Use of Battered Woman Syndrome: Institutionalization of Negative Stereotypes about Women Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/73t5x0m5 Journal UCLA Women's Law Journal, 8(1) Author Cornia, Rebecca D. Publication Date 1997 DOI 10.5070/L381017687 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ESSAY CURRENT USE OF BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME: INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF NEGATIVE STEREOTYPES ABOUT WOMEN Rebecca D. Cornia* ABSTRACT In this Essay, Rebecca Cornia examines how courts currently use Battered Woman Syndrome ("BWS") to explain why soci- ety should excuse women who behave irrationally. Cornia compares BWS to the Marital Coercion Doctrine, a Nine- teenth Century defense that excused women who committed crimes at the direction of their husbands. Cornia traces courts' use of BWS to excuse the criminal acts of women acting under duress from their batterers and to impeach women testifying on behalf of their abusers in domestic violence cases. Cornia analyzes the current use of BWS, which she asserts stereotypes women as irrational, leading to their detriment in other legal proceedings including: child custody battles, child abuse cases, and bar disciplinary proceedings. Cornia explains that the trend in the courts to use BWS in such a wide variety of cases portrays women as irrational and therefore undermines the position of women in society as a whole. She argues that the BWS defense should be reconstructed or replaced altogether. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..................................... 100 II. OVERVIEW OF BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME .... 101 * Rebecca Dao Cornia graduated from Harvard Law School in 1986.
    [Show full text]