Analyzing Child Abuse and Rape in Immigration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analyzing Child Abuse and Rape in Immigration U.S. Department of Justice http://eoir-vll/lib_index.html Executive Office for Immigration Review Published since 2007 Immigration Law Advisor July - August 2012 A Legal Publication of the Executive Office for Immigration Review Vol. 6 No. 7 Discussing the Unmentionable: In this issue... Analyzing Child Abuse and Page 1: Feature Article: Rape in Immigration Law Discussing the Unmentionable: by Elizabeth Donnelly Analyzing Child Abuse and Rape in Immigration Law Page 4: Federal Court Activity ith the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Page 9: BIA Precedent Decisions Act of 1996, Division C of Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009- 546 (“IIRIRA”), Congress sought to “establish an interrelated Page 15: Regulatory Update W statutory structure designed to put certain targeted criminal aliens on a fast track for removal.” Kwon v. Comfort, 174 F. Supp. 2d 1141, 1143 (D. Colo. 2001). The IIRIRA significantly expanded the criminal grounds of removability, in part by adding child abuse as a new ground of removal The Immigration Law Advisor is a under section 237(a)(2)(E)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, professional newsletter of the Executive 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i), and expanding the definition of an aggravated Office for Immigration Review felony to include rape in section 101(a)(43)(A) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. (“EOIR”) that is intended solely as an § 1101(a)(43)(A). In addition Congress limited the availability of relief educational resource to disseminate from removal for aliens who committed certain crimes. information on developments in immigration law pertinent to the In doing so, Congress did not specifically define the terms “child Immigration Courts and the Board abuse” or “rape.” Since enactment of the IIRIRA, case law has provided of Immigration Appeals. Any views some insight into the definition of these terms; however, the scope of “child expressed are those of the authors and abuse” and “rape” remain rather underdeveloped. In their analyses, the do not represent the positions of EOIR, the Department of Justice, the Attorney Federal courts and Board of Immigration Appeals have drawn heavily on General, or the U.S. Government. This legislative history and historical context to divine congressional intent as to publication contains no legal advice the contemporary meanings of these terms. The scope of these two provisions and may not be construed to create now falls on opposite ends of the spectrum, with child abuse taking on an or limit any rights enforceable by expansive definition and rape confined to a relatively small subset of the law. EOIR will not answer questions sexual offenses that currently populate Federal and State criminal law. concerning the publication’s content or how it may pertain to any individual Crime of Child Abuse case. Guidance concerning proceedings before EOIR may be found in the Section 237(a)(2)(E)(i) of the Act renders deportable any alien Immigration Court Practice Manual who at any time after entry is convicted of child abuse, child neglect, or and/or the Board of Immigration Appeals Practice Manual. child abandonment. Two precedent decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals explicitly address the issue of child abuse, as do a handful of 1 circuit court cases, some of them unpublished. Generally a “well-recognized legal concept” by the time Congress speaking, the available case law indicates that the term is made it a deportable offense in 1996. Id. at 508. Thus, broad, covering a range of conduct that harms or even the Board had an “established legal usage” from which threatens harm to a child. to determine the “ordinary, contemporary, and common meaning” of child abuse. Id. Accordingly, the Board In Matter of Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 22 I&N Dec. looked to establish a common, flexible definition capable 991, 992 (BIA 1999), the alien was convicted under a of uniform application nationwide. It then assessed the Texas statute of indecency with a child by exposure and legal landscape as of 1996, which included seven Federal sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment. The Board held statutes concerning child abuse. Noting that the inclusion that the crime constituted sexual abuse of a minor and of “child abuse” in the IIRIRA was an effort to aggressively was therefore an aggravated felony. In its analysis of this combat crimes against children, the Board concluded aggravated felony, the Board noted in dicta that a “crime that a broad definition was appropriate. Ultimately, it of child abuse” includes actions and inactions that do not proposed that the term involved require contact with the victim, citing the Black’s Law Dictionary definition—“[a]ny form of cruelty to a child’s any offense involving an intentional, physical, moral, or mental well-being.” For a time, in knowing, reckless, or criminally the absence of a more definitive statement, the Board negligent act or omission that constitutes applied this language in unpublished orders, and at least maltreatment of a child or that impairs two circuit courts found it a reasonable interpretation of a child’s physical or mental well-being, the statute. Ochieng v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 1110, 1114-15 including sexual abuse or exploitation. At (10th Cir. 2008) (holding that injury to children under a minimum, this definition encompasses section 18-1501(1) of the Idaho Code Annotated is a convictions for offenses involving the crime of child abuse); Loeza-Dominguez v. Gonzales, 428 infliction on a child of physical harm, F.3d 1156, 1159 (8th Cir. 2005) (holding that malicious even if slight; mental or emotional harm, punishment of a child under section 609.377 of the including acts injurious to morals; sexual Minnesota Statutes is a crime of child abuse). abuse, including direct acts of sexual contact, but also including acts that induce The Board addressed the definition of child (or omissions that permit) a child to engage abuse, neglect, or abandonment in 2008 with Matter in prostitution, pornography, or other of Velazquez-Herrera, 24 I&N Dec. 503 (BIA 2008). sexually explicit conduct; as well as any The alien pled guilty to violating a Washington fourth- act that involves the use or exploitation of degree assault statute and was sentenced to 360 days’ a child as an object of sexual gratification imprisonment. Although the conviction record initially or as a tool in the commission of serious referenced a child victim, a superseding information that crimes, such as drug trafficking. was filed later eliminated any reference to the victim’s age. The Immigration Judge nonetheless found the Id. at 512. The Board further held that a “child” was an offense to be child abuse within the meaning of section individual under 18 years of age and that the definition 237(a)(2)(E)(i) of the Act, relying on information outside was not limited to offenses committed by parents or by the conviction record. The Board initially agreed in a someone acting in loco parentis. brief order. However, following a remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, In analyzing whether a particular State offense the Board adopted a formal definition of child abuse and is a “crime of child abuse,” the Board determined that determined that a categorical approach should be applied courts should employ a categorical approach, confined to to this ground of removal. Applying this approach, the the elements of the offense and the admissible portions Board held that the Government had failed to establish of the conviction record. Under this analysis, the assault removability under section 237(a)(2)(E)(i) by clear and offense in the Washington State statute at issue, which convincing evidence. contained no element requiring proof that the conduct was committed against someone under 18, did not In defining child abuse, the Board observed that constitute a categorically removable offense under section the term “child abuse,” while left undefined in the Act, was 237(a)(2)(E)(i). Furthermore, because State prosecutors 2 had also amended the alien’s conviction record to child abuse offenses” meet the definition it proposed.Id. at eliminate all references to a child victim, the modified 383. At the time, some 38 States and other U.S. territories categorical approach was of no help in establishing the included in their civil definition of child abuse acts or alien’s removability for the crime. The emphasis, the circumstances that threaten harm or create a substantial Board reiterated, remained on the offense of conviction, risk of harm to a child. Some States required a high threat not the respondent’s possible conduct. of harm, though more than half of that number failed to delineate the degree of threat required for a conviction. In Fregozo v. Holder, 576 F.3d 1030, 1035 States used various terminology to describe the threat. The (9th Cir. 2009), the alien pled nolo contendere to a Board left the task to the Immigration Courts to decide California misdemeanor child endangerment statute that whether the risk of harm in any particular statute rose to criminalized “willfully caus[ing] or permit[ting] . [a] the level of child abuse within the meaning of the Act. child to be placed in a situation where his or her person or health may be endangered.” Id. at 1037 (quoting section Turning to the Colorado statute in question, the 273a(b) of the California Penal Code) (internal quotation Board in Matter of Soram stated that the mens rea was marks omitted). The Ninth Circuit deferred to the consistent with that required under Velasquez-Herrera, the Board’s definition of “child abuse” inMatter of Velasquez- juvenile status of the victim was an element of the crime, Herrera but interpreted that definition to require some“ and a study of State case law revealed that the threat to the form” of actual injury on a child.
Recommended publications
  • Systematic Review of Academic Bullying in Medical Settings: Dynamics and Consequences
    Open access Original research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043256 on 12 July 2021. Downloaded from Systematic review of academic bullying in medical settings: dynamics and consequences Tauben Averbuch ,1 Yousif Eliya,2 Harriette Gillian Christine Van Spall1,2,3 To cite: Averbuch T, Eliya Y, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Van Spall HGC. Systematic Purpose To characterise the dynamics and consequences review of academic bullying of bullying in academic medical settings, report factors in medical settings: dynamics ► This systematic review is comprehensive, including that promote academic bullying and describe potential and consequences. BMJ Open 68 studies with 82 349 consultants and trainees, 2021;11:e043256. doi:10.1136/ interventions. across several countries and including all levels of bmjopen-2020-043256 Design Systematic review. training. We searched EMBASE and PsycINFO for Data sources ► We defined inclusion criteria a priori and used es- ► Prepublication history and articles published between 1 January 1999 and 7 February additional supplemental material tablished tools to assess the risk of bias of included for this paper are available 2021. studies. online. To view these files, Study selection We included studies conducted in ► The included studies varied in their definitions of please visit the journal online academic medical settings in which victims were bullying, sampling bias was noted among the sur- (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ consultants or trainees. Studies had to describe bullying veys and intervention studies were suboptimally bmjopen- 2020- 043256). behaviours; the perpetrators or victims; barriers or designed. facilitators; impact or interventions. Data were assessed Received 29 July 2020 independently by two reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders of Protection and the Battered Women Syndrome Sheila M
    Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 23 Issue 3 Spring 1992 Illinois Judicial Conference Article 3 Symposium 1992 Orders of Protection and the Battered Women Syndrome Sheila M. Murphy Honorable Assoc. Judge, Circuit Court of Cook County, IL Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj Part of the Law and Gender Commons Recommended Citation Sheila M. MurphyHonorable, Orders of Protection and the Battered Women Syndrome, 23 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 397 (1992). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol23/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Orders of Protection and the Battered Woman Syndrome Honorable Sheila M. Murphy* Violence in the home strikes at the heart of our society. Chil- dren who are abused or who live in homes where parents are battered carry the terrible lessons of violence with them into adulthood.... To tolerate family violence is to allow the seeds of violence to be sown into the next generation. We as a nation can no longer allow these victims to suffer alone. We must understand the breadth and scope of the prob- lem. We must admit that family violence is found at every level of the social structure. We must let victims know that they need not hesitate to seek help. We must listen with an understanding heart and we must act in ways which prevent, protect and sup- port.
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect
    STATE STATUTES Current Through March 2019 WHAT’S INSIDE Defining child abuse or Definitions of Child neglect in State law Abuse and Neglect Standards for reporting Child abuse and neglect are defined by Federal Persons responsible for the child and State laws. At the State level, child abuse and neglect may be defined in both civil and criminal Exceptions statutes. This publication presents civil definitions that determine the grounds for intervention by Summaries of State laws State child protective agencies.1 At the Federal level, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment To find statute information for a Act (CAPTA) has defined child abuse and neglect particular State, as "any recent act or failure to act on the part go to of a parent or caregiver that results in death, https://www.childwelfare. serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, gov/topics/systemwide/ or exploitation, or an act or failure to act that laws-policies/state/. presents an imminent risk of serious harm."2 1 States also may define child abuse and neglect in criminal statutes. These definitions provide the grounds for the arrest and prosecution of the offenders. 2 CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-320), 42 U.S.C. § 5101, Note (§ 3). Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect https://www.childwelfare.gov CAPTA defines sexual abuse as follows: and neglect in statute.5 States recognize the different types of abuse in their definitions, including physical abuse, The employment, use, persuasion, inducement, neglect, sexual abuse, and emotional abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Abuse/Neglect
    Wisconsin Child Welfare PDS Mandated Reporter Training Threatened Abuse/Neglect There is no statutory definition for the phrase “threatened with abuse or neglect”, so common- sense definitions are applied. “Threatened abuse and neglect” refers to behaviors or conditions the child is exposed to that are dangerous to the child and likely to result in abuse or neglect. Remember when we were defining physical abuse - the example of the man beating his wife while their toddler hangs on to her leg? If the child is injured, it is physical abuse. If the child is not injured, it is threatened abuse, as a reasonable person could predict such behavior could result in serious injury to the child. Threatened abuse or neglect also includes instances when someone verbally threatens to injure a child, if you believe he or she is serious about carrying out the threat. Is threatened abuse or neglect less serious than actual abuse or neglect? Threatened abuse or neglect can be very serious. If a report includes information that indicates a vulnerable child is in immediate danger, CPS and law enforcement respond very quickly. The purpose of giving CPS and law enforcement agencies the authority to intervene in cases of threatened abuse or neglect is to prevent serious harm to a child, whenever possible. What are some situations you may come across that are not threatened maltreatment? Here are two examples: Verbal “threats”, such as “You know, sometimes I could just throttle that kid”, where it is clear someone is just making an exaggerated comment and has no intention whatsoever of following through.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing Child Abuse: What Parents Should Know
    Prevent Child Abuse America 500 North Michigan Avenue Suite 200 Chicago, IL 60611.3703 312.663.3520 tel 312.939.8962 fax www.preventchildabuse.org Recognizing Child Abuse: What Parents Should Know The first step in helping abused children is learning to recognize the symptoms of child abuse. Although child abuse is divided into four types -- physical abuse, neglect, sexual abuse, and emotional maltreatment -- the types are more typically found in combination than alone. A physically abused child for example is often emotionally maltreated as well, and a sexually abused child may be also neglected. Any child at any age may experience any of the types of child abuse. Children over age five are more likely to be physically abused and to suffer moderate injury than are children under age five. 1. Recognizing Child Abuse 2. Signs of Physical Abuse 3. Signs of Neglect 4. Signs of Sexual Abuse 5. Signs of Emotional Maltreatment RECOGNIZING CHILD ABUSE Experienced educators likely have seen all forms of child abuse at one time or another. They are alert to signs like these that may signal the presence of child abuse. The Child: • Shows sudden changes in behavior or school performance; • Has not received help for physical or medical problems brought to the parents' attention; • Has learning problems that cannot be attributed to specific physical or psychological causes; • Is always watchful, as though preparing for something bad to happen; • Lacks adult supervision; • Is overly compliant, an overachiever, or too responsible; or • Comes to school early, stays late, and does not want to go home.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics About Sexual Violence
    National Sexual Violence Resource Center z Info & Stats For Journalists Statistics about sexual violence Sexual violence in the U.S. y 81% of women and 35% of men report significant short-term or long-term impacts such as Post- y One in five women and one in 71 men will be raped Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a) at some point in their lives (a) y Health care is 16% higher for women who were y 46.4% lesbians, 74.9% bisexual women and 43.3% sexually abused as children (m) heterosexual women reported sexual violence other than rape during their lifetimes, while 40.2% gay Child sexual abuse men, 47.4% bisexual men and 20.8% heterosexual men reported sexual violence other than rape during y One in four girls and one in six boys will be sexually their lifetimes. (p) abused before they turn 18 years old (f) y Nearly one in 10 women has been raped by an y 34% of people who sexually abuse a child are family intimate partner in her lifetime, including completed members (n) forced penetration, attempted forced penetration y 12.3% of women were age 10 or younger at the time or alcohol/drug-facilitated completed penetration. of their first rape/victimization, and 30% of women Approximately one in 45 men has been made to were between the ages of 11 and 17 (a) penetrate an intimate partner during his lifetime. (b) y 27.8% of men were age 10 or younger at the time y 91% of the victims of rape and sexual assault are of their first rape/victimization (a) female, and 9% are male (o) y More than one-third of women who report being raped y In eight out of 10 cases of rape, the victim knew the before age 18 also experience rape as an adult (a) person who sexually assaulted them (l) y 96% of people who sexually abuse children are y 8% of rapes occur while the victim is at work (e) male, and 76.8% of people who sexually abuse children are adults (n) Cost and Impact y 325,000 children are at risk of becoming victims of y Each rape costs approximately $151,423 (d) commercial child sexual exploitation each year (m) y Annually, rape costs the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Battered Woman Syndrome: Institutionalization of Negative Stereotypes About Women
    UCLA UCLA Women's Law Journal Title Current Use of Battered Woman Syndrome: Institutionalization of Negative Stereotypes about Women Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/73t5x0m5 Journal UCLA Women's Law Journal, 8(1) Author Cornia, Rebecca D. Publication Date 1997 DOI 10.5070/L381017687 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ESSAY CURRENT USE OF BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME: INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF NEGATIVE STEREOTYPES ABOUT WOMEN Rebecca D. Cornia* ABSTRACT In this Essay, Rebecca Cornia examines how courts currently use Battered Woman Syndrome ("BWS") to explain why soci- ety should excuse women who behave irrationally. Cornia compares BWS to the Marital Coercion Doctrine, a Nine- teenth Century defense that excused women who committed crimes at the direction of their husbands. Cornia traces courts' use of BWS to excuse the criminal acts of women acting under duress from their batterers and to impeach women testifying on behalf of their abusers in domestic violence cases. Cornia analyzes the current use of BWS, which she asserts stereotypes women as irrational, leading to their detriment in other legal proceedings including: child custody battles, child abuse cases, and bar disciplinary proceedings. Cornia explains that the trend in the courts to use BWS in such a wide variety of cases portrays women as irrational and therefore undermines the position of women in society as a whole. She argues that the BWS defense should be reconstructed or replaced altogether. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..................................... 100 II. OVERVIEW OF BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME .... 101 * Rebecca Dao Cornia graduated from Harvard Law School in 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Neglect: an Overview Howard Dubowitz, MD, MS, Gina Poole, Phd University of Maryland, School of Medicine, USA August 2019, Rev
    MALTREATMENT (CHILD) Child Neglect: An Overview Howard Dubowitz, MD, MS, Gina Poole, PhD University of Maryland, School of Medicine, USA August 2019, Rev. ed. Introduction Neglect is by far the most common form of child maltreatment reported to the U.S. child welfare system; 75% of 1 reports in 2017 were for neglect. The short- and long-term outcomes associated with neglect are often serious, including fatalities, physiological changes in the brain, academic difficulties, criminal behaviour and mental 1 health problems. In 2017, 75% of deaths attributed to child maltreatment involved neglect. Furthermore, child neglect places an enormous economic burden on society. A conservative estimate regarding the costs 2 associated with child maltreatment exceeded 100 billion dollars a year; much of this was for neglect. Subject In general, the child welfare system considers neglect when there are parental omissions in care that result in actual or potential harm. An alternative approach focuses on children’s unmet needs, acknowledging the many 3 possible contributors (e.g., lack of access to health care), as well as parental behaviour. The latter approach fits with the developmental ecological perspective which posits that no one factor alone contributes to neglect; there are multiple and interacting contributors at the level of the child, parents, family, community and society. Neglect often does not involve one discrete act. Rather, it is a pattern of care that falls on a continuum ranging from optimal, where a child’s needs are fully met, to extremely harmful, where a child’s needs are not met at all. In addition, given that neglect naturally varies in type, severity and chronicity, it is clearly a very heterogeneous phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Emotional Child Abuse
    Fact Sheet: Emotional Child Abuse What is it? Emotional child abuse is maltreatment which results in impaired psychological growth and development.i It involves words, actions, and indifference.2 Abusers constantly reject, ignore, belittle, dominate, and criticize the victims.1,3 This form of abuse may occur with or without physical abuse, but there is often an overlap.4 Examples of emotional child abuse are verbal abuse; excessive demands on a child’s performance; penalizing a child for positive, normal behavior (smiling, mobility, exploration, vocalization, manipulation of objects); discouraging caregiver and infant attachment; penalizing a child for demonstrating signs of positive self-esteem; and penalizing a child for using interpersonal skills needed for adequate performance in school and peer groups.1,3 In addition, frequently exposing children to family violence and unwillingness or inability to provide affection or stimulation for the child in the course of daily care may also result in emotional abuse.3 How is it identified? Although emotional abuse can hurt as much as physical abuse, it can be harder to identify because the marks are left on the inside instead of the outside.4 Not surprising, there exist few well-validated measures of childhood emotional abuse. Clinicians can use a revised version of the Child Abuse and Trauma Scale (CATS) which targets measures for emotional abuse.5 Caregivers can also closely observe children’s behaviors and personalities. Children suffering from emotional abuse are often extremely loyal
    [Show full text]
  • Physical and Behavioral Indicators of Child Abuse and Neglect
    Physical and Behavioral Indicators NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT of Child Abuse and Neglect OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Physical Indicators Behavioral Indicators Unexplained bruises and welts: .On face, lips, mouth .On torso, back, buttocks, thighs .In various stages of healing .Wary of adult contacts .Cluster, forming regular patterns .Reflecting shape of article used to inflict (electric cord, belt buckle) .On several different surface areas .Apprehensive when other children cry .Regularly appear after absence, weekend or vacation Unexplained burns: .Behavioral extremes: PHYSICAL .Cigar, cigarette burns, especially on soles, palms, back or buttocks –Aggressiveness ABUSE .Immersion burns (sock-like, glove-like doughnut shaped on –Withdrawal buttocks or genitalia) .Patterned like electric burner, iron, etc. .Frightened of parents .Rope burns on arms, legs, neck or torso Unexplained fractures: .Afraid to go home .To skull, nose, facial structure .In various stages of healing .Multiple or spiral fractures .Reports injury by parents Unexplained laceration or abrasions: .To mouth, lips, gums, eyes .To external genitalia .Consistent hunger, poor hygiene, inappropriate dress .Begging, stealing food .Extended stays at school (early arrival .Consistent lack of supervision, especially in dangerous activities and late departure) PHYSICAL or long periods .Constantly falling asleep in class .Constant fatigue or listlessness NEGLECT .Alcohol or drug abuse .Unattended physical problems or medical needs .Delinquency (e.g. thefts) . Abandonment .States there is no caregiver .Unwilling to change for gym or participate in PE .Difficulty in walking or sitting .Withdrawn, fantasy or infantile behavior .Torn, stained or bloody underclothing .Bizarre, sophisticated or unusual sexual . SEXUAL Pain or itching in genital area behavior or knowledge . ABUSE Bruises or bleeding in external genitalia, vaginal or anal areas .Poor peer relationships .
    [Show full text]
  • Intimate Partner Violence and Child Abuse Considerations During
    Intimate Partner Violence and Child Abuse Considerations During COVID-19 As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, Americans are required to stay home to protect themselves and their communities. However, the home may not be safe for many families who experience domestic violence, which may include both intimate partners and children. COVID-19 has caused major economic devastation, disconnected many from community resources and support systems, and created widespread uncertainty and panic. Such conditions may stimulate violence in families where it didn’t exist before and worsen situations in homes where mistreatment and violence has been a problem. Violence in the home has an overall cost to society, leading to potentially adverse physical and mental health outcomes, including a higher risk of chronic disease, substance use, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and risky sexual behaviors.1 Further, victims of domestic violence including intimate partner abuse and child abuse are at great risk for injuries including death. Intimate Partner Violence According to CDC, approximately 1 in 4 women and nearly 1 in 10 men have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) sexual violence, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner during their lifetime. Moreover, more than 43 million women and 38 million men experienced psychological aggression by an intimate partner in their lifetime.2 Approximately 41% of female IPV survivors and 14% of male IPV survivors experience some form of physical injury related to IPV. It is important to acknowledge that IPV can extend beyond physical injury and result in death. Data from U.S. crime reports suggest that 16% (about 1 in 6) of homicide 1 Preventing Multiple Forms of Violence: A Strategic Vision for Connecting the Dots.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect
    FACTSHEET April 2019 Long-Term Consequences of WHAT’S INSIDE Child Abuse and Neglect Physical health consequences Aside from the immediate physical injuries children Psychological can experience through maltreatment, a child’s consequences reactions to abuse or neglect can have lifelong and even intergenerational impacts. Childhood Behavioral maltreatment can be linked to later physical, consequences psychological, and behavioral consequences as well Societal as costs to society as a whole. These consequences consequences may be independent of each other, but they also may be interrelated. For example, abuse or neglect may Federal research on stunt physical development of the child’s brain and adverse childhood lead to psychological problems, such as low self- experiences esteem, which could later lead to high-risk behaviors, Preventing and such as substance use. The outcomes for each child reducing the long- may vary widely and are affected by a combination of term consequences factors, including the child’s age and developmental of maltreatment status when the maltreatment occurred; the type, Conclusion frequency, duration, and severity of the maltreatment; and the relationship between the child and the References perpetrator. Additionally, children who experience maltreatment often are affected by other adverse experiences (e.g., parental substance use, domestic violence, poverty), which can make it difficult to separate the unique effects of maltreatment (Rosen, Handley, Cicchetti, & Rogosch, 2018). Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Long-Term Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect https://www.childwelfare.gov This factsheet explains the long-term physical, Migraine headaches psychological, behavioral, and societal consequences of Chronic bronchitis/emphysema/chronic obstructive child abuse and neglect and provides an overview of pulmonary disease adverse childhood experiences (ACEs).
    [Show full text]