DOCSLIB.ORG

Declaration of Support for the Andean Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Declaration of Support for the Andean Parliament Asamblea Parlamentaria Euro-Latinoamericana Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée Parlementaire Euro-Latino Américaine Assembleia Parlamentar Euro-Latino-Americana Parlamentarische Versammlung Europa-Lateinamerika DECLARATION OF SUPPORT FOR THE ANDEAN PARLIAMENT The Co-Presidents of the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (EuroLat), the Member of Parliament Leonel Búcaro, for the Latin American component, and the Member of the European Parliament José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, in accordance with Article 18 of the Rules of Procedure of the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly, on the occasion of its Seventh Ordinary Plenary Session, held in the city of Athens, Greece, on 27-29 March 2014 and in view of the considerations of the Andean Parliament set out in the Annex 1. Express their solidarity and support for the Andean Parliament as the deliberative body of the Andean Integration System, representing the peoples of the Andean Community; 2. Consider it important to help the Andean Community achieve the integration of the Andean peoples and not only their governments; 3. Stress the importance of closely examining a situation in which the phasing-out of the Andean Parliament would be an obstacle to the democratic legitimisation of the Andean integration process; 4. Reaffirm their support for efforts by the Andean Parliament to adapt to the new vision and strategic guidelines embraced by the Andean Community and to the co-existence between this and other sub-regional parliamentary areas. DL\1024684EN.doc AP101.595v01-00 EN EN ANNEX CONSIDERATIONS OF THE ANDEAN PARLIAMENT REGARDING THE INSTITUTIONAL CRISIS Within the framework of the Seventh Ordinary Plenary Meeting of the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (EuroLat), the Members of the Andean Parliament call on the Members of the EuroLat Assembly to take the following considerations into account, on the basis of the resolution on EU-Latin America relations with a view to the Fifth Lima Summit, with special reference to democratic governance, adopted at its First Ordinary Plenary Session from 18 to 20 December 2007 in Brussels, Belgium, and on the basis of Articles 1, 3 and 18 of the Rules of Procedure of the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly: The Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly was created in November 2006 as the Parliamentary Institution of the Bi-regional Strategy Partnership between the European Union and Latin America, promoting transparency in that process and enabling it to be brought closer to the interests and expectations of their citizens. Its objectives include helping to support, promote and consolidate policy making in areas such as democracy, external policy, governance, integration, peace and human rights. The Andean Parliament was a driving force behind the creation of the Parliamentary Assembly and is one of the supranational parliaments making up the Latin American component Under Decision 792, adopted by the Andean Council of Foreign Ministers in an enlarged meeting with the representatives of the Commission of the Andean Community, the implementation of measures for the re-engineering of the Andean Integration System was approved. Under that Decision, it was agreed to set up a High-Level Group to start work on the preparation of a protocol to facilitate the exit of the Andean Parliament from the Andean Integration System, which, once signed, must be submitted for approval to the legislatures of the member countries. AP101.595v01-00 2/3 DL\1024684EN.doc EN This is at odds with the report drawn up by the Getulio Vargas Foundation recommending the consolidation of the Andean Parliament and the assignment of parliamentary management responsibilities for the purposes of political dialogue and the drafting of legislation on social issues relating to the Andean integration process, with a view to deepening the foundations of the Andean Community (CAN) and revitalising the Andean Integration System. The reports on the re-engineering process highlight the work of the Andean Parliament as a key component that makes a significant contribution to the democratic values required by the Andean Integration System in order to achieve the levels of efficiency, effectiveness and transparency deemed to be essential by the Andean Presidential Council if the Andean Community is to rise to the challenges facing it at international level. The proposed phasing-out of the joint deliberative body from the Andean Integration System strikes an unprecedented blow against institutional structures, the democratic values of the Andean peoples and the popular mandate directly endowed by the citizens of Colombia, Ecuador and Peru in democratic and transparent elections. The phasing-out of the Andean Parliament from the CAN means abandoning the basic principle of the social integration of peoples enshrined in the Protocol of Trujillo, under which the Andean Integration System was created. It is impossible for the Andean Parliament to join the South American Parliament, given that the latter does not exist. The phasing-out of the Andean Parliament will create an undeniable democratic deficit in the region. DL\1024684EN.doc 3/3 AP101.595v01-00 EN.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trade Agreement Between the European Union and Colombia and Peru
    Trade agreement between the European Union and Colombia and Peru European Implementation Assessment STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Editor: Anna Zygierewicz Ex-Post Evaluation Unit PE 621.834 – July 2018 EN Trade agreement between the European Union and Colombia and Peru European Implementation Assessment On 29 November 2017, the Committee on International Trade (INTA) of the European Parliament requested authorisation to undertake an own-initiative report on the implementation of the trade agreement (TA) between the EU and Colombia and Peru (2018/2010 (INI). Santiago Fisas Ayxelà (EPP, Spain) was appointed rapporteur. This European implementation assessment has been provided to accompany the work of the INTA committee in scrutinising the implementation of the agreement. This European implementation assessment (EIA) consists of two parts. The in-house opening analysis (Part I) outlines the process leading to the signature of the trade agreement between the EU and Colombia and Peru. It also presents the socio-economic situation in Colombia and Peru and relations between the EU and Colombia and Peru, as well as relations between the EU and the Andean Community. The research paper prepared by external experts (Part II) presents a detailed analysis of trade in goods and services and foreign direct investments. The paper also evaluates, in detail, the implementation of the trade and sustainable development chapter of the trade agreement in both Colombia and Peru. Finally, the paper provides recommendations for the improvement of the implementation of the trade agreement. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHORS Part I: The opening analysis has been prepared by Dr Anna Zygierewicz, Ex-Post Evaluation Unit, EPRS.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
    LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN The EU’s relations with Latin America and the Caribbean are multifaceted and conducted at different levels. The EU interacts with the entire region through summits of the heads of state and government, while agreements and political dialogue bind the EU and the Caribbean, Central America, the Andean Community, Mercosur and individual countries. LEGAL BASIS — Title V (EU external action) of the Treaty on European Union; — Titles I-III and V (common commercial policy; development cooperation and humanitarian aid; international agreements) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. REGION-TO-REGION RELATIONS A. The summits The first summit between the EU, Latin America and the Caribbean was held in Rio de Janeiro in June 1999 and established a Bi-regional Strategic Partnership. The most recent biennial summit, held in June 2015 in Brussels, was the second between the EU and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños, CELAC). The summits strengthen links between the two regions at the highest level and address issues on the bi-regional and international agendas. Debates have focused on topics such as democracy and human rights; fighting poverty; promoting social cohesion, innovation and technology; and the environment and climate change. The Brussels summit adopted a short political declaration, a longer declaration on the different aspects of the partnership and an EU- CELAC action plan, based on the priorities established by the recent
    [Show full text]
  • EU Trade with Latin America and the Caribbean Overview and Figures
    EU trade with Latin America and the Caribbean Overview and figures IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Authors: Gisela Grieger and Roderick Harte Members' Research Service PE 625.186 – September 2018 EN This publication provides an overview of trade relations between the EU and Latin American and Caribbean countries and groupings. The EU has fully fledged agreements with two Latin American groupings (Cariforum and the Central America group), a multiparty trade agreement with three members of the Andean Community (Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru), and bilateral agreements with Chile and Mexico. Since November 2017, a new agreement governing trade relations with Cuba has also been provisionally applied. In addition, the EU is currently modernising its agreements with Mexico (with which it has reached an 'agreement in principle') and Chile. The EU also has framework agreements with Mercosur and its individual members (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay). The agreement with the former will be replaced, once the ongoing negotiations on an EU-Mercosur association agreement have been completed. This publication provides recent data on trade relations between the EU and Latin American and Caribbean countries and groupings, compares the main agreements governing trade relations that are already in place, and analyses the rationale behind the ongoing negotiations on the EU-Mercosur, EU-Mexico and EU-Chile agreements. This paper has been drawn up by the Members' Research Service, within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. To contact the authors, please email: [email protected] Original manuscript, in English, completed in September 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Addressing Human Rights in the Court of Justice of the Andean Community and the Tribunal of the Southern African Develop
    Colombia Internacional ISSN: 0121-5612 [email protected] Universidad de Los Andes Colombia Molano-Cruz, Giovanni; Kingah, Stephen Addressing Human Rights in the Court of Justice of the Andean Community and the Tribunal of the Southern African Development Community Colombia Internacional, núm. 81, mayo-agosto, 2014, pp. 99-127 Universidad de Los Andes Bogotá, D.C., Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81231284006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Addressing Human Rights in the Court of Justice of the Andean Community and the Tribunal of the Southern African Development Community Giovanni Molano-Cruz Universidad Sergio Arboleda (Colombia) Stephen Kingah UNU-CRIS (Belgium) DOI: dx.doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint81.2014.04 RECEIVED: November 28, 2012 ACCEPTED: April 3, 2013 REVISED: February 10, 2014 ABSTRACT: The article compares how the regional tribunals of the Andean Community (CAN) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have dealt with human rights issues in order to explore options for South-South judicial cooperation through adjudicative cross-fertilization, while taking into account specificities that characterize both regions. In doing so, focus is placed on four elements: a) the scope of human rights covered by each of the regional tribunals; b) the locus standi of individuals before the tribunals; c) the added value of the regional tribunals; and d) the restrictive role of politics in the functioning of the tribunals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Reassessment of Regional Parliaments in Latin America: Parlasur, Parlandino and Parlatino
    A comparative reassessment of regional parliaments in Latin America: Parlasur, Parlandino and Parlatino DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600115 Revista Brasileira de Rev. Bras. Polít. Int., 60(1): e007, 2017 Política Internacional ISSN 1983-3121 Abstract http://www.scielo.br/rbpi The present article assesses and compares the MERCOSUR Parliament, the Karina Pasquariello Mariano Andean Parliament, and the Latin American Parliament as instruments to insert Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade political representation and parliamentarians in their respective integration de Ciências e Letras, Araraquara – SP, Brazil projects. It is argued that the development of regional parliaments in Latin ([email protected]). America, however, has not produced substantial changes in regional decision- ORCID ID: making processes, which remain the exclusive domain of intergovernmental orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-918X or interpresidential exchanges. Regiane Nitsch Bressan Keywords: Regional integration; Latin America; Democracy; MERCOSUR Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Política, Economia e Parliament; Andean Parliament; Latin American Parliament. Negócios, São Paulo - SP, Brazil ([email protected]). ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-793X Received: May 19, 2016 Accepted: October 6, 2016 Bruno Theodoro Luciano University of Birmingham, Political Science and International Studies, Birminghan, United Kingdom ([email protected]). ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1276-6076 Introduction egional integration processes in
    [Show full text]
  • 5) Working Paper “International Law and Migration Detention: Coding State Adherence to Norms” TABLE of CONTENTS Introduction
    5) Working paper “International Law and Migration Detention: Coding State Adherence to Norms” TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Vincent Chetail I A Normative Framework for Immigration Detention Izabella Majcher II Establishing Indicators for Norm-based Assessments of Immigration Detention Mariette Grange III Freedom versus Security: How Different Norms Interact with Policy Choices Michael Flynn Conclusion References 15 Introduction Migration-related detention is a widespread, yet partially documented, phenomenon. While detention is one of the main tools used by states to control access to their territory and to manage their borders, the international normative framework is plagued by recurrent ambiguities and misunderstandings. At the same time, detention of migrants has increasingly become the target of criticism from experts and advocates, who charge that those involved in the treatment of detainees consistently fail to abide by established international norms. Against such a background, the tasks carried out by the SNIS project have been threefold. The first objective of the SNIS research project has been to identify, refine and classify the myriad of international rules governing detention of migrants. The overall result of our endeavor is to provide a comprehensive and well-accepted legal framework able to guide the different actors involved in this controversial field. The second objective of the research has been then to provide tools for assessing state behavior regarding migration detention. With this objective in mind the research team has identified and developed indicators for recording and measuring states’ commitments to international legal norms, as well as implementation efforts at the domestic level. The third and last task has been to collect the two above mentioned results into an online database making information on detention practices available to any person interested in the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Andean Community of Nations
    5(*,21$/675$7(*<$1'($1&20081,7<2)1$7,216 1 $FURQ\PV1 ACT Amazonian Cooperation Treaty AEC Project for the establishment of an common external tariff for the Andean States AIS Andean Integration System (comprises all the Andean regional institutions) ALADI Latin American Integration Association (Member States of Mercosur, the Andean Pact and Mexico, Chile and Cuba) ALALC Latin American Free Trade Association, replaced by ALADI in 1980 ALA Reg. Council Regulation (EEC) No 443/92 of 25 February 1992 on technical and financial and economic cooperation with the countries of Asia and Latin America ALFA Latin American Academic Training Programme ALINVEST Latin American investment programme for the promotion of relations between SMEs @LIS Latin American Information Society Programme APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (21 members)2 APIR Project for the acceleration of the regional integration process ARIP Andean Regional Indicative Programme ATPA Andean Trade Preference Act CACM Central American Common Market: Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Honduras CAF Andean Development Corporation CALIDAD Andean regional project on quality standards CAN Andean Community of Nations: Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela + AIS CAPI Andean regional project for the production of agricultural and industrial studies CARICOM3 Caribbean Community DAC Development Assistance Committee of the OECD DC Developing country DFI Direct foreign investment DG Directorate-General DIPECHO ECHO Disaster Preparedness Programme EC European Community ECHO
    [Show full text]
  • EU Trade with Latin America and the Caribbeanoverview and Figures
    EU trade with Latin America and the CaribbeanOverview and figures IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Authors: Gisela Grieger and Roderick Harte Members' Research Service October 2017 — PE 608.793 EN This publication provides an overview of trade relations between the EU and Latin American and Caribbean countries and groupings. The EU has concluded fully fledged agreements with two Latin American groupings (Cariforum and the Central America group), a multiparty trade agreement with three members of the Andean Community (Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru), and bilateral agreements with Chile and Mexico. It is currently also modernising its agreement with Mexico and intends soon to start negotiations on modernising its agreement with Chile. The EU has also concluded framework agreements with Mercosur and its individual members (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay). The agreement with the former will be replaced, once the on-going negotiations on an EU-Mercosur association agreement have been completed. This publication provides recent data on trade relations between the EU and Latin American and Caribbean countries and groupings, compares the agreements governing trade relations that have already been concluded, and analyses the reasons behind the ongoing and planned negotiations on the EU-Mercosur, EU-Mexico and EU-Chile agreements. PE 608.793 ISBN 978-92-846-2007-4 doi:10.2861/881332 QA-05-17-064-EN-N Original manuscript, in English, completed in October 2017. The authors thank Odile Maisse and Giulio Sabbati for their assistance and contribution on graphics. Unless otherwise stated, all data in this publication are from Eurostat. This is a revised and updated edition of a publication from March 2016 by Enrique Gomez Ramirez, Eleni Lazarou, Laura Puccio and Giulio Sabbati.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartagena Agreement
    THE CARTAGENA AGREEMENT _______________ CODIFICATION OF THE ANDEAN SUBREGIONAL INTEGRATION AGREEMENT (CARTAGENA AGREEMENT) Presentation The Protocol of Trujillo was signed by the Andean Presidents during the Eighth Presidential Council that was held in the city of Trujillo, Peru, in March of 1996. It replaces Chapter II of the Cartagena Agreement and requests that the Commission adopt a codified text through a Decision. It is in compliance with this Presidential Mandate that the Commission of the Andean Community, in its Eighty-seventh Special Term held in the city of Quito, Ecuador, on June 25, 1997, approved Decision 406: "Codification of the Andean Subregional Integration Agreement (Cartagena Agreement)". This codified text includes the original Cartagena Agreement and its respective modifying instruments: the Additional Instrument for the accession of Venezuela (1973); the Protocol of Lima (1976); the Protocol of Arequipa (1978); the Protocol of Quito (1987), and the Protocol of Trujillo. The Protocol of Trujillo, moreover, creates the Andean Community and establishes the Andean Integration System, with a series of bodies and institutions which have required that, in this text, the references "Commission of the Cartagena Agreement", "Board of the Cartagena Agreement", "Court of Justice of the Cartagena Agreement", and " Cartagena Agreement Law" be substituted for "Commission of the Andean Community", "General Secretariat of the Andean Community", "Court of Justice of the Andean Community", and "Andean Community Law", respectively. In addition, the Protocol of Trujillo authorizes the necessary adjustments to the numbering of the articles, for which reason the numbering of the articles of the previous Codified Text (Decision 236) does not necessarily coincide with the present numbering (Decision 406).
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation and Regional Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean
    Cooperation and regional integration in Latin America and the Caribbean COOPERATION AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION ORGANIZATIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN United States Canada UNASUR Andean Community, CAN (1996) United States Caribean Community, CARICOM (1973) Saint Kitts & Nevis Antigua & Barbuda Central American Common Market, Bahamas Montserrat CACM (1960) Dominica Saint Lucia Mexico Saint Vicent & Granadines Cuba Dominican Rep. Common Market of the South, Jamaica Grenada MERCOSUR (1991) Belize Haiti Barbados Honduras Trinidad & Tobago Guatemala North American Free Trade El Salvador Nicaragua Agreement, NAFTA (1992) Panama Costa Guyana Rica Venezuela Surinam Central American Integration System, SICA (1993) Colombia Equador LAIA: Mexico, Cuba, Chile, countries of the Andean Community and Mercosur Brazil Peru IBERO-AMERICAN COMMUNITY: Andorra, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Bolivia Equador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Dominican Republic, Spain, Uruguay Paraguay and Venezuela RIO GROUP: Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Chile Uruguay Rica, Cuba, Equador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Argentina Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Dominican Republic, Surinam, Uruguay and Venezuela OAS: all the American independent States except Cuba 127 LATIN AMERICAN INTEGRATION in different ways because of prices and volumes. Countries ex- ASSOCIATION (LAIA) porting basic products suffered drops in prices while exporters The ongoing effects of the world financial crisis resulted in of manufactured goods were affected by the reduced volume diminished growth and a slump in international trade in 2009. of goods exchanged. As for imports, in general, slowdowns According to estimates compiled in the IMF report World Eco- were basically due to the diminished volume of purchases.
    [Show full text]
  • IAJC’S Centenary Celebrations; AWARE of the Valuable Assistance Given by Dr
    PERMANENT COUNCIL OEA/Ser.G CP/doc.4695/12 8 March 2012 Original: Spanish ANNUAL REPORT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN JURIDICAL COMMITTEE TO THE FORTY-SECOND REGULAR OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES INTER-AMERICAN JURIDICAL COMMITTEE 79th REGULAR SESSION OEA/Ser.Q/IV.42 August 1 to 6, 2011 CJI/doc.399/11 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 5 August 2011 Original: Spanish ANNUAL REPORT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN JURIDICAL COMMITTEE TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2011 General Secretariat Organization of the American States www.oas.org/cji [email protected] EXPLANATORY NOTE Until 1990, the OAS General Secretariat published the “Final Acts” and “Annual Reports of the Inter-American Juridical Committee” under the series classified as “Reports and Recommendations”. In 1997, the Department of International Law of the Secretariat for Legal Affairs began to publish those documents under the title “Annual Report of the Inter-American Juridical Committee to the General Assembly”. According to the “Classification Manual for the OAS official records series”, the Inter- American Juridical Committee is assigned the classification code OEA/Ser.Q, followed by CJI, to signify documents issued by this body (see attached lists of resolutions and documents). iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXPLANATORY NOTE......................................................................................................................................... III TABLE OF CONTENTS .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.At What Point Does a Legislature Become Institutionalized? the Mercosur Parliament's Path
    Brazilian Political Science Review E-ISSN: 1981-3821 [email protected] Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política Brasil Dri, Clarissa At What Point does a Legislature Become institutionalized? the Mercosur Parliament’s Path Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 3, núm. 2, 2009, pp. 60-97 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política São Paulo, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=394341994003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative brazilianpoliticalsciencereview ARTICLE At What Point does a Legislature Become Institutionalized? The Mercosur Parliament’s Path* Clarissa Dri University of Bordeaux, France The Mercosur Parliament was created in 2005 to represent the peoples of the region. The constitutive documents affirm the necessity of reinforcing and deepening integration and democracy within Mercosur through an efficient and balanced institutional structure. In order to examine the potential role of the Parliament in strengthening the institutional framework of the bloc, this paper aims to analyse its initial years of activity. What is the institutionalization level reached by the assembly so far? The research is grounded on the idea that the more institutionalized the legislature is, the more it will influence the political system. The article presents a comparative approach that considers the earliest steps of the European Parliament. In terms of methodology, the qualitative analysis is based on documental research and on direct observation of the Mercosur Parliament’s meetings. The main conclusions are related to the limited level of institutionalization of this new assembly, in spite of its innovative features regarding the Mercosur structure, and to its similarity with the initial period of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]