DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliotheca Pepysiana; a Descriptive Catalogue of the Library of Samuel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliotheca Pepysiana; a Descriptive Catalogue of the Library of Samuel Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Ottawa http://www.archive.org/details/bibliothecapepysOOpepy — A DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE OF THE LIBRARY OF SAMUEL PEPYS. By arrangement with the Master and Fellows of Magdalene College, Cambridge. Part I.—"Sea" MSS. Edited by J. R. Tanner, Litt.D., St. John's College, Cambridge. (Published 1914.) Part II. Early Printed Books to 1558. Edited by E. Gordon Duff. With a General Introduction, giving the history of the Library, by F. Sidgwick. (Published 1914.) LONDON: SIDGWICK Sc JACKSON, Ltd. BIBLIOTHECA PEPYSIANA Part III.—MEDIAEVAL MANUSCRIPTS NOTE Not more than 500 copies of the complete Catalogue will be issued ; but owing to the special appeal made by one or two of the Parts, a limited number of extra copies of such Parts has been or will be printed for independent sale. The Illustrations, consisting of photographic facsimiles will be issued in a portfolio as a separate Part. BIBL10THECA PEPYSIANA A DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE OF THE LIBRARY OF SAMUEL PEPYS Part III. — MEDIAEVAL MANUSCRIPTS By Dr. M. R. JAMES Provost of Eton : sometime Provost of King's College LONDON: SIDGWICK & JACKSON, LTD. M CM XXIII [Temporary Title-page.] 5 °L^^>"^ FEB 18 1954,; s | 1 ^Z.Z RIGHTS RESERVED MEDIAEVAL MANUSCRIPTS INTRODUCTION HE present section of the Pepysian catalogue contains an account of the mediaeval manuscripts and some others of literary interest. In compiling it I have followed the method employed in my other catalogues of manuscripts : the order in which the books are described is simply that of their places on the shelves, an order dictated largely by considerations of size. The only printed catalogue of the Pepys Manuscripts which professes to give a general view of the collection is that which appears in the Oxford Catalogi Manuscriptorum Angliae et Hiberniae (1697 II. 207). It is entitled : Librorum Manuscriptorum viri sapientissimi Samuelis Pepysii, Curiae Admiraliae nuper a secretis, varii quidem argumenti, sed praecipue de re navali, quae est Anglorum gloria ac Praesidium, Thesaurus in- aestimabilis. 1 The numbering (a double one) runs from 6716 (1) to 6848 (129), and the catalogue has these subdivisions : Historical'. 6716 (1) to 6730(15). Political: 6731 (16) to 6749 (30). Religious: 6750 (31) to 6766 (47). Mathematical : 6767 (48) to 6785 (66). Poetical: 6786 (67) to 6792 (73). Mixt: 6793 (74) to 6809 (90). Naval: 6810 (91) to 6848 (129). (With a sub-heading at 6835 0/ Naval Architecture, which, however, does not cover all the items that follow it.) This cataloguers has been said, was issued in 1697 : it may have been drawn up some years earlier. Pepys did not die till 1703; not all his 1 first is The numbering that which runs through the whole volume : the other is that of the single collection. BIBIJOTHECA PEPYSIANA manuscripts, therefore, need appear in this list. That fact will account for some incompleteness in the catalogue. I have not tried to discover exactly how incomplete it is in other departments ; but in my own I find that 14 volumes out of the 51 which I describe are not entered in it. It has another imperfection, one of method. A single volume, if it contains several treatises, is split up, and a separate entry and number given to each treatise, so that the number of entries is swelled much beyond the number of volumes. The nineteen entries of Mathematical books, for example, are comprised in three manuscripts. Thirty-seven volumes described by me have sixty entries in the old catalogue. Of losses which the collection has suffered in the section with which I am concerned I can only find one to record: 6779 (60) Bernardus Silvester de Virtute ac Essentia Planetarum et Constellationum cum figuris. Pergam. Of omissions in the present volume — or (as I would rather put it) of volumes and tracts not included — there are many. Taking the old printed catalogue as a basis, I find that of the 15 Historical articles I have here described 6; of the 14 Political, 3; of the 16 Religious, 15 ; of the 19 of the Mathematical, 18; of the 7 Poetical, 5 ; of the 17 Mixt, n ; 39 Naval, 1. Those which are passed over are all of quite late date, except two, viz. Caxton's translation of Ovid's Metamorphoses, printed from the manuscript by George Hibbert in 18 19 for the Roxburghe Club ; and the Maitland Poems, the entire text of which is being edited for the Scottish Text Society. On the other hand, I have included, either by request or because they happened to interest me, several manuscripts which are no older than some which I have left out. Two or three volumes, moreover, are common, in virtue of their subject, to the mediaeval and to other sections : they contain music, or naval matter. These I have not attempted to treat from the specialist's standpoint. As to the composition of the collection. Without doubt the volumes containing English prose and poetry are the most famous. The religious poetry has been included in Professor Carlelon Brown's admirable Register of Middle English Religious Verse, published by the Bibliographical Society in two volumes, to which I have given references. The Chaucerian pieces MEDIAEVAL MANUSCRIPTS (2006) have been long known. To Poetry I reckon Nos. 1236, 1461, 1584, 1999, 2006, 2011, 2014, 2030, 2101, 2125, 2344. English Prose is an important constituent in 2125 and 2498. There are also medical and other receipts in 878, 1047, 1307, and portions of the Bible in 1576, 1603. More recent verse is in 1999 and 21 and there is the bulky rhymed Chronicle of Herdinge in 2163. The most important French books are the Apocalypse (1803), the Vegetius, etc. (1938), and the Guillaume de Machaut (1594). The Coro- nation of Claude (1791) is an interesting, but ugly book. Jean Mallart's little book (1607) is illustrated with woodcuts. The ordinary ingredients of a collection of manuscripts are not to be found here. Not a single Latin Bible, Psalter, Missal, or Breviary did Pepys acquire. There is but one book of Hours—but that is interesting from the number of commemorations of Scottish saints which it contains (1576). One patristic manuscript—Isidore (2808) — and that not theo- logical : no Scholastic Divinity, no Canon or Civil Law. The Medical books are English. Science does contribute two, both of some interest, the volume of mathematical treatises (2329) obtained by Dr. Dee (quite honestly) from Peterhouse, and the Bacon (1207) which was also Dee's. Alchemy (1295) follows at the heels of Science, and Magic (1530) on the heels of Alchemy. Among the historical books I reckon 146 1, 1791, 1955, 1998, 2014, 2099, 2163, 2191, 2244, 2314, 2516. They are a motley array : some belong to more than one category. I call attention here to only one (2314), which must come from St. Augustine's, Canterbury, and, if I mistake not, is closely connected with the better known manu- script of Thomas of Elmham at Trinity Hall. This is almost the only manuscript with a fairly clear monastic provenance. 1 The pretty Kalendar (1662) that was written at Durham, was probably used by a layman. Coming to the artistic aspect of the books, I unhesitatingly place first the mediaeval sketch-book (1916). There are very few such things any- where, and I believe that this of Pepys's is the only English one in 1 The word provenance having occurred, I take the occasion to observe that it seems useless to expect any information from Pepys's papers as to when and whence he procured his manuscripts, other than naval. The bill for Spanish books, lately published by Mr. Gaselee in the Transactions of the Bibliographical Society , appears to be the only document of the kind which has survived either at Oxford or Cambridge. 2. C2 BIBLIOTHECA PEPYSIANA existence. Though it is later and less important in many ways than the famous book of Villars de Honnecourt, at Paris, which has been twice at least reproduced in full, it would amply repay a special monograph. The other notable picture books are the Apocalypse (1803), and the 2 Speculum (2359). Vegetius (1938 ) has some fair pictures, the Coronation Claude (1791) some bad ones, the Kalendar (1662) some very nice drawings. The complete list of picture books is : 1576, 1594, 1662, 1791, 1803, 2 1916, 1938 , 2258,2359. The Octateuch(i6o3)has some very clever late restorations of illumination in it. Palaeographically the scrap-book (2981) is by far the most interesting. Its specimens of early writing, from the eighth century onwards, include some very great rarities. It would be a good thing if they could be detached so as to render the verso-sides visible ; but so far this has not been found practicable. The last item in my catalogue, a ' copy-book of about 1400' is not impossibly unique. I at least have never seen another. I am afraid that this catalogue may have suffered a little from the long interval which has of necessity elapsed between the writing of it and its appearance in print. During that time I removed from Cambridge to Eton, and it became no longer possible to refer to the manuscripts them- selves, to verify small points, or to resort to libraries, with the same ease, and keep abreast of publications of texts and periodical literature. The catalogue is therefore in essentials a pre-war production. I submit, in palliation of defects which may be found in it (I am thinking principally of references to modern editions) that no catalogue can be absolutely up to date : in fact, one object of the cataloguer is to pave the way for others to supersede his own work by publishing texts and studying pictures and scripts to which he has called their attention.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Office of the Dead in Portuguese Medieval Uses
    nova série | new series 4/1 (2017), pp. 167-204 ISSN 2183-8410 http://rpm-ns.pt The Office of the Dead in Portuguese Medieval Uses João Pedro d’Alvarenga CESEM Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas Universidade Nova de Lisboa [email protected] Resumo Este artigo procura determinar a procedência dos formulários do Ofício de Defuntos dos principais usos litúrgicos medievais portugueses (Braga, Coimbra, Évora e Santa Cruz de Coimbra) e percorrer as mudanças que neles ocorreram até ao início do período moderno. São consideradas as circunstâncias históricas da restauração das diferentes dioceses depois da reconquista, a origem e o percurso dos seus primeiros prelados, as fontes subsistentes de cada uso litúrgico e as suas características específicas, com referência à literatura especializada entretanto produzida. A exemplo do estudo pioneiro de Knud Ottosen, a metodologia assenta também numa ampla comparação das séries de responsórios e versos das Matinas de Defuntos e outras particularidades textuais e musicais de fontes locais e de fontes ibéricas e francesas seleccionadas. Em apêndice, são fornecidas listas exaustivas das fontes manuscritas e impressas dos usos de Braga, Évora e Santa Cruz, incluindo as respectivas localizações e referências bibliográficas relevantes. Palavras-chave Ofício de Defuntos; Usos litúrgicos portugueses; Filiações litúrgicas; Séries de responsórios e de versos; Portugal no período medieval e início do período moderno. Abstract This article aims to establish the ancestry of the formularies of the Office of the Dead in the main Portuguese medieval liturgical uses (Braga, Coimbra, Évora and Santa Cruz in Coimbra) and track their changes up to the early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • 385 Richard W. Pfaff, the Liturgy in Mediaeval England
    Book Reviews / Ecclesiology 9 (2013) 367–412 385 Richard W. Pfaff, The Liturgy in Mediaeval England: A History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009) xxviii + 593 pp. £75.00/$120.00. ISBN 978- 0-521-80847-7 (hbk). Richard Pfaff, now Emeritus Professor of History at the University of North Carolina, has spent a professional lifetime working on the liturgy in Mediaeval England. This volume is both a testimony to these labours and an indispensable guide to the texts in this field, that will be the standard map of the territory for many years to come. There is no other comparable resource, and this book is all the more valuable as it gives a summary of the history of the study of some of the primary sources and analyses the value of their nineteenth- or early twentieth-century editions. Pfaff’s particular interests give a slant to some of the material – not least in the choice of what to leave out. His earlier work (notably New Liturgical Feasts in Later Medieval England [1970], Liturgical Calendars, Saints, and Services in Medieval England [1998]) explored means of tracking regional links and dating additions and alterations to the calendar. In this massive survey, ranging from what we know of pre-Augustine liturgy in England – not an enormous amount! – to the lavish printings on the eve of the Reformation, he consciously omits any study of pastoral rites and of the popular devotional literature – the books of hours and personal missals which frequently interest the romantic leanings of social historians and (rightly) excite the art historians – nor does he touch the complex area of pontifical liturgy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feast of Saint Thomas Becket at Salisbury Cathedral: Ad Vesperas
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 4-2019 The Feast of Saint Thomas Becket at Salisbury Cathedral: Ad Vesperas Virginia Elizabeth Martin Tilley College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, and the Musicology Commons Recommended Citation Tilley, Virginia Elizabeth Martin, "The Feast of Saint Thomas Becket at Salisbury Cathedral: Ad Vesperas" (2019). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1385. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1385 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 The Feast of Saint Thomas Becket at Salisbury Cathedral: Ad Vesperas A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Music from The College of William and Mary by Virginia Elizabeth Martin Tilley Accepted for __________________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) ________________________________________ Thomas B. Payne, Director, Music ________________________________________ James I. Armstrong, Music ________________________________________ Alexander B. Angelov, Religious Studies Williamsburg, VA 12 April
    [Show full text]
  • THE SARUM USE by the Reverend Canon Professor J. Robert Wright Historiographer of the Episcopal Church
    THE SARUM USE By the Reverend Canon Professor J. Robert Wright Historiographer of the Episcopal Church he Sarum Use” is the name applied to the particular rendering of divine worship in the English Church that was developed at “T Salisbury, in Wiltshire, from the early thirteenth century and then gradually spread to become at least by the fourteenth century the finest local expression of the Western or Roman Rite in England up to the Reformation. “Sarum” is the abbreviation for Sarisburium, the Latin word for Salisbury, which was and is both a city and a diocese in south central England. The Use of Sarum, then, was a rather exuberant, elaborate, beautiful, and especially well arranged adaptation of the Western or Roman Rite that was gradually adopted by most of the rest of England as well as much of Wales, Scotland, Ireland, and even some places on the continent. Indeed, the first Sarum Missal to be printed was at Paris in 1487, then Basle 1489, Rouen 1492, Venice 1494, etc., and not at London until 1498. (The General Theological Seminary has two Sarum Missals, one printed at Paris in 1555 and one at Rouen in 1508). Origins The Norman Conquest (1066) ushered in not only a widespread building and rebuilding of cathedrals and churches on a larger scale and in Romanesque architecture but also continental influences tending towards the centralization of both liturgy and monastic customs. Even earlier this could be seen in the Regularis Concordia of c. 970, and after the Conquest in the Monastic Constitutions of Archbishop Lanfranc. Parallel and subsequent to these developments there seems to have been a need felt for a certain clarity and fixity in liturgical matters at the secular (non-monastic) cathedrals.
    [Show full text]
  • “Anglican Use of the Roman Rite”? the Unity of the Liturgy in the Diversity of Its Rites and Forms Hans-Jürgen Feulner
    Antiphon 17.1 (2013): 31-72 “Anglican Use of the Roman Rite”? The Unity of the Liturgy in the Diversity of Its Rites and Forms Hans-Jürgen Feulner The internationally known German liturgist Balthasar Fischer († 2001) was rather far-sighted and somewhat euphoric, when, already in 1981, in connection with article 4 of the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, he mentioned the ecumenical dimension of the liturgy: Nowhere does reunification any longer mean—and also not in the West—the adoption of the Roman liturgy and of specifically Catholic piety. Today one can very well imagine how the magnificent liturgy celebrated by our Anglican brothers, with some minute changes, could become a ritus legitime agnitus [lawfully acknowledged rite]; an English liturgical family among the liturgical families of the Catholic Church. With all the spiritual riches that have been amassed here in 400 years, she would join her wagon to the train of Catholic liturgies.1 On June 15, 2012, a decree of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) created the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of the Southern Cross2—the third Personal Ordinariate to date. This 1 Balthasar Fischer, “Liturgie oder Liturgien?”, in Trierer Theologische Zeitschrift 90 (1981) 265–275, here 273–274 (translation from German; emphasis added and my explanation of the Latin expression). Here the term “liturgical families” more probably means “rites.” 2 Holy See Press Office, “Erezione di Ordinariato Personale di Our Lady of the Southern Cross e nomina del primo Ordinario”, in Daily Bulletin (June 15, 2012): http://www.news.va/en/news/73782 (accessed 10/12/2012); Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Decree of Erection of the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of the Southern Cross” (June 15, 2012; Prot.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Missal for Selected Feasts (Use of Sarum)
    Missal for Selected Feasts (use of Sarum) In Latin, illuminated manuscript on parchment England (London), 1400-1425 (before 1423?) iv + 151, modern foliation in pencil 1-151 followed here, lacking six leaves, two cancelled with no loss of text (collation i6 ii-v8 vi8 [-3, one leaf after f. 40, with loss of text] vii8 viii5 [original structure uncertain, probably a quire of six with fourth leaf cancelled following f. 56, no loss of text] ix8 [- 6, one leaf after f. 63] x-xi8 xii8 [-5, one leaf after f. 85] xiii- xiv8 xv8 [-4, one leaf after f. 107, with loss of text] xvi-xviii8 ix8 [-8, following f. 142, cancelled with no loss of text] xx9 [complete, structure uncertain, but possible a quire of ten with the first leaf cancelled]), horizontal catchwords lower inner margin, leaf and quire signatures in quire sixteen, ruled in lead with the top two and bottom two horizontal rules full across, and with extra double rules in the upper and lower margins, full-length vertical bounding lines with an extra set of double vertical rules in the outer margin, prickings sometimes remain outer and bottom margins (justification 118 x 88-85 mm.), main text written in a gothic bookhand in two columns of twenty-four lines, with the Ordinary and Canon, ff. 59-79, (justification 113-112 x 85 mm.) in two columns of twenty lines, contemporary additions in two hands, ff. 79-81v and 139v-142 (following layout of main scribe), and ff. 143-151 (justification 142-138 x 77 mm.) in 23 long lines, red rubrics, one-line alternately red and blue initials with contrasting penwork, two-line blue initials with red penwork, 18 LARGE ILLUMINATED INITIALS with scrolling acanthus borders (see below), some water damage to lower margins, minor soiling, initial on f.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Customary of Salisbury Cathedral [OCF]
    Sarum Customary Online 5: The Old Customary from frere’s use of sarum i [ocf] English Translation Only Interim Edition May 2013 Project Director & General Editor John Harper Source Transcription & Editing Christopher Hodkinson & Matthew Cheung Salisbury Translation & Review of Latin Texts Henry Howard Sarum Customary Online is an element of a larger research project, The Experience of Worship in late Medieval Cathedral & Parish Church, based at Bangor University within the research programme, Religion and Society, funded jointly by the Arts & Humanities Research Council and the Economic & Social Research Council. The Old Customary of Salisbury Cathedral [OCF] from W. H. Frere, ed., The Use of Sarum, I (Cambridge, 1898) English translation only ____________________________________________________________________ W.H. Frere published an edition of the Sarum customary which presented two texts of the Consuetudinary (here, the Old Customary) and Customary (here, the New Customary) in parallel columns as the first volume of The Use of Sarum. His edition of the Old Customary has been a standard text for over a hundred years, and has been widely used and cited. Unusually, Frere chose the later version of the Old Customary for his reading, as being the fuller of the two: generally he preferred the oldest source as his base point. So, the primary text and the ordering follow that of British Library, Harley MS 1001 (OCR in this project). Frere also incorporated supplementary paragraphs, sections, sub-sections, and phrases from other sources, delineated by a system of bracketing. Variants were recorded in the footnotes. The editorial procedure here is described overleaf: suffice to say that this is a reading of the main text only, supplemented for the first time by a translation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sarum Missal in English
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARYi CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 1924 092 460 033 p^ Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tile Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924092460033 THE LIBRARY OF LITURGIOLOGY 6f ECCLESIOLOGY FOR ENGLISH READERS THE LIBRARY OF LITURGIOLOGY &> ECCLESIOLOGY FOR ENGLISH READERS Edited by VERNON STALEY PROVOST OF THE CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF ST. ANDREW INVERNESS Volume VIII Cjje Saturn jUtsisal IN ENGLISH PART I LONDON ALEXANDER MORING LTD. THE DE LA MORE PRESS 32 GEORGE STREET HANOVER SQUARE W. 1911 ^]^c Sarum Mfesal 1 €1)0 ^arum jHi00al IN ENGLISH Newly Translated by FREDERICK E. WARREN, B.D., F.S.A. RECTOR OF BARDWELL; HON. CANON OF ELY LATE FELLOW OF ST. JOHn's COLLEGE OXFORD PART I LONDON ALEXANDER MORING LTD. THE DE LA MORE PRESS 32 GEORGE STREET HANOVER SQUARE W. 191 CONTENTS OF PART I. PAGE INTRODUCTIO^ I. Kalendar I Blessing of Salt and Water 13 The Asperges . 15 Blessing of Bread on Sundays 17 Prayers before Mass 17 Ordinary of the Mass 20 Canon of the Mass . 42 Thanksgiving after Mass 56 Prayers in Prostration . 58 Prayers after Mass 61 Mass in Remembrance of the Fea sts of the B.V.M. The Proper of Seasons 67 Anniversary of Dedication of a Church 414 Consecration of a Church 421 Reconciliation of a Church . 423 CONTENTS OF PART II. Common of Saints ...... i Votive Masses . 55 Common Memories ...... 125 Order of Matrimony ..... 143 Foe Part I CONTENTS OF PART II.—continued.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sarum Mass Edward Vith”S “First” Prayer Book
    THE SARUM MASS VERSUS EDWARD VITH”S “FIRST” PRAYER BOOK Church Association Tract 113 BY J. T. TOMLINSON SIR ROBERT PHILLIMORE, when Dean of the Arches, said,1 “The whole Prayer Book in fact, with very inconsiderable exceptions, consists of a translation of the Ancient Liturgies, and especially of that liturgy used by the Western Church.” Hallam said, (Const. Hist. I, 68.) “The liturgy was essentially the same with the Mass book.” The editor employed by Messrs. Griffith and Farran to write a preface to their cheap edition of the Second Prayer Book of Edward VI, says, “The first liturgy of King Edward followed closely the ancient Canon, only it was in English.” On the other hand Prebendary Sadler tells us, “The Eucharistic service of the Church of England is substantially a new service. If we take even the Communion Office of 1549 and compare it with the Canon according to the Use of Sarum, we find that by far the greater part of it is new.” “The office of 1549 occupies twenty-three closely-printed pages at the end of Mr. Maskellʼs ʻAncient Liturgies of the Church of England,ʼ and of these not above two pages are to be found in the Sarum Missal.” (The Church and the Age, p. 305.) Canon Estcourt has placed this beyond controversy by printing side by side in parallel columns the Liturgy of 1549 and the Canon of Sarum, with the result of showing that “every expression which implied a real and proper sacrifice had been weeded out. The canon is so mutilated that only here and there do the words in the two books agree.” (Dogmatic Teaching of the Book of Common Prayer on the Eucharist, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Sarum Influence on the 1549 Book Of
    Durham E-Theses `Nothing for the godly to fear': Use of Sarum Inuence on the 1549 Book of Common Prayer KRICK-PRIDGEON, KATHERINE,ANNE How to cite: KRICK-PRIDGEON, KATHERINE,ANNE (2018) `Nothing for the godly to fear': Use of Sarum Inuence on the 1549 Book of Common Prayer, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12868/ Use policy This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA) Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ‘Nothing for the godly to fear’: Use of Sarum Influence on the 1549 Book of Common Prayer Katherine Anne Krick A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Durham University March 2018 1 Abstract Katherine A. Krick – ‘Nothing for the godly to fear’: Use of Sarum Influence on the 1549 Book of Common Prayer This thesis examines the extent to which the Use of Sarum service books provided an evolutionary basis for the form and content of the 1549 edition of the Book of Common Prayer (BCP). This study focuses on the contributions of the Sarum books to the 1549 BCP from a book history viewpoint, addressing where necessary the religious and political issues, in order to better comprehend the ways in which such changes would have impacted Tudor people. First offering an analysis of the genres studied as the BCP’s antecedents, this thesis further surveys how governmental attitudes affected religious doctrine and practice in the service books of the English realm, during the vacillations of the 1530s and 1540s.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarum Use and Disuse: a Study in Social and Liturgical History
    SARUM USE AND DISUSE: A STUDY IN SOCIAL AND LITURGICAL HISTORY Thesis Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Arts in Theological Studies By James R. Joseph, M.A. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio August, 2016 SARUM USE AND DISUSE: A STUDY IN SOCIAL AND LITURGICAL HISTORY Name: Joseph, James Ryan APPROVED BY: __________________________________________ Michael S. Carter, Ph.D. Faculty Adviser Professor of History __________________________________________ William H. Johnston, Ph.D. Faculty Reader Professor of Religious Studies __________________________________________ Jennifer Speed, Ph.D. Faculty Reader Professor of Religious Studies __________________________________________ Daniel Speed Thompson, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Religious Studies ii ABSTRACT SARUM USE AND DISUSE: A STUDY IN SOCIAL AND LITURGICAL HISTORY Name: Joseph, James R. University of Dayton Adviser: Dr. Michael S. Carter Academic study of the Sarum Use, or the Use of Salisbury, the dominant liturgical tradition of medieval England, has long been overshadowed by a perception of triviality and eccentric antiquarianism inherited from the nineteenth century. Further, the Sarum Use has been in relative disuse in the Roman Catholic Church since the early seventeenth century. Using primarily the research of Eamon Duffy and Richard Pfaff, this thesis seeks to readdress both of these aspects of the Sarum Use and argues that because of the unique history and experience of the English Church in the period following the English Reformation, the Sarum liturgy holds an important place in English religious history. The thesis argues for the revival of serious academic interest in Sarum itself as well as for the active renewal of the Sarum tradition for contemporary Catholic liturgical use within the context of the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual of Marriage
    Ritual of Marriage Liturgial treatment of matrimony Marriage, RITUAL OF.—The form for the celebration of the Sacrament of Matrimony, as it stands in the"Rituale Romanum" of the present day, is remarkably simple. It consists of the following elements: (I) A declaration of consent made by both parties and formally ratified by the priest in the words: "Ego conungo vos in matrimonium in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti. Amen" (I unite you in wedlock in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Amen). (2) A form for the blessing of the ring which the bridegroom receives back from the hand of the priest to place it upon the ring finger of the bride's left hand. (3) Certain short versicles and a final benedictory prayer. This ceremony according to the intention of the Church should be followed by (4) the Nuptial Mass, in which there are Collects for the married couple, as well as a solemn blessing after the Pater Noster and another shorter one before the priest's benediction at the close. At this Mass also it is recommended that the bride and bridegroom should communicate. But although here as elsewhere the "Rituale Romanum" may be regarded as providing the form of the Church's ceremonial, in treating of the Sacrament of Matrimony a special rubric is inserted in the following terms: "If, however, in any provinces, other laudable customs and ceremonies are in use besides the foregoing in the celebration of the Sacrament of Matrimony, the holy Council of Trent desires that they should be retained" (see Decreta Conc.
    [Show full text]