WHS Suffrage Scotland – Paisley Case Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WHS Suffrage Scotland – Paisley Case Study THE WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT IN SCOTLAND, 1867- 1928: A LEARNING RESOURCE CASE STUDY – WAS THERE SUFFRAGE MILITANCY IN PAISLEY? Valerie Wright In this section you will find information on the following: An account of how to approach research on suffrage militancy in your area What kinds of sources were consulted to find out what happened in Paisley What kinds of sources were available locally and where these were consulted A description of findings about the evidence of militancy in Paisley Early twentieth century Paisley was a town dependent on the thread industry, and the paternalistic capitalism of the Coats and Clarks families, the shipyards and many other 2 manufacturing and food processing firms based in the town. It was a town, like Dundee, known for its ‘mill girls’, where women were a large proportion of the thread mills' workforce. Also known for its radical politics, it had, at the height of suffrage militancy in the UK, four Co- operative Wholesale Societies. This hints at a socialist undercurrent, although the Liberals held the town throughout this period. Unfortunately no suffrage organisation records survive in Paisley Heritage Centre, but there are copies of The Paisley and Renfrewshire Gazette a weekly broadsheet newspaper which provided local news, numerous advertisements, accounts of sporting events, and marriages, deaths and births. Searches of the newspaper index for ‘suffrage’ and ‘votes for women’ were unsuccessful (a problem arising from how the index was compiled, rather than its coverage as such). But by searching under ‘Paisley’ and ‘Scottish’ a couple of references to suffrage meetings in 1909 were found. Yet the main period of militancy was 1913 and 1914. There were no references to anything suffrage related, which necessitated looking through both years in their entirety. In 1909 the only suffrage meetings reported in Paisley were organised by the Scottish WSPU. At the first, in April, Dr Marion Gilchrist, demanding ‘Votes for Women’ stated that: ‘If the militant movement on the part of the women were a movement for evil she should be the last to encourage it, but the women were fighting the greatest battle of modern times. They were fighting against great odds, but she would advise them all, for their own sakes, to join the movement. The women were fighting for equal opportunities for every individual of the human race in this country, in order that they should not be classed with lunatics, Marion Gilchrist, 1894 criminals and imbeciles’. (Applause). Miss Conolan, the second speaker, described the vote as ‘simply an instrument by which the women might bring about the industrial and social reforms which were 3 needed in our country today’. Miss Evelyn Sharp, (a London-based journalist, author and suffragette) also considered unemployment suggesting that child labour and the undercutting of women were causes. She stated that ‘Women did not take low wages because they liked it; they took low wages because they were the highest they could get’. Although ‘the vote would not directly make wages go up, it would improve the position of women in every way, and they would be better able to demand higher wages’. Later in October a larger meeting was held in the town hall. The Gazette notes that for a week or two before the meeting ‘an active Evelyn Sharp open air propaganda had been carried on in the town on behalf of the ‘votes for women’ movement’ and as a result ‘doubtless many were attracted to the meeting on this account’. The ‘free seats in the gallery and area were filled to overflowing’ and ‘a large number were unable to find admission’. Perhaps expecting a commotion, it was stated that ‘the proceedings were of a very orderly nature’ with the exception of the occasional interruption, ‘nothing occurred during the evening to mar the success of the gathering’. The table on the stage was decorated with suffrage colours (Green, white and violet) and there were advertisements for a publication which the reporter did not name, though this was probably Time and Tide. In the chair, ‘the Hon’ Mrs Haverfield stated that ‘it was the working women that they wanted votes for’ which may have reflected the composition of the audience, though there is no way of knowing for certain. Miss Margaret Cameron stated that she thought women ‘should demand the vote on respectability alone’ and that the ‘ultimate result of their agitation would lead to the dignity of women, the happiness of children, and to the comfort of the home’. Moreover she stated that ‘they had trust in the people. They knew there was a finer sense of justice in the people than there was amongst a few men at Westminster who were now holding a little brief authority, (hear, hear)’. Again such sentiments would indicate that the speakers thought that there may have been working- class women in the audience given the emphasis on respectability and motherhood, and also the focus on ‘the people’ as opposed to politicians is telling too and suggests perhaps a potentially socialist audience. The final speaker of the night was Miss Adela Pankhurst, the youngest of the Pankhurst sisters, who would be imprisoned and go on hunger strike in Dundee later in the same month, for attempting to smash the roof of a hall where Dundee MP Winston Churchill would be speaking. Later she emigrated to Australia in 1914, after a rift with her family (she would be written out of Emmeline and Christabel’s accounts of the movement). Pankhurst maintained that ‘the women would never give way in the work they had taken up until they got the parliamentary vote’. She went on to discuss force feeding: 4 The Government could go and put them in prison. They as women had no remedy. They had no power against the Government. The Ministry had even in their treatment of them found out a way of prolonging life. They knew that women kept in prison without food would die, and they had found out a way to prolong life with artificial feeding. It might be that some of the women treated in this manner would die. Well, they were willing to die for their cause. Others would most certainly take their place. The Government must give way or the women must give way, and she could assure the meeting that the women would never give way. (Applause). Yet, she stated that women would never burn buildings to get the vote the way men had years ago, ‘but they were ‘quite content now and then to throw a stone through a window, just to remind those inside the building that the woman without the votes were outside. (laughter and applause)’. At the end of the meeting thanks were given to the audience for the cordial reception. It would seem that the audience was very much in support of the sentiments of the speakers from the WSPU, even assertions that they were willing to die for the cause and the need for window smashing. However despite the number of people in attendance at this meeting, there does not appear to be any follow-on activity in Paisley. In 1913 reports tended to focus on the campaign at a national level with discussions of Scottish MPs opinions on the resolution in parliament to grant the vote to women. Summaries of debates in the House of Commons also featured, especially relating to suffragettes on hunger strike and suffragists being betrayed by the Liberals. The ‘Cat and Mouse’ Act was also discussed when passed in April, and by July in an article entitled ‘Militant ‘mouse’ play’ it was suggested that ‘the public are becoming tired of the Government’s methods, or rather lack of them, in dealing with the militant suffragists’ with the act not only failing ‘to supress militancy’ but failing ‘to ensure the perpetrators of outrages’ were being ‘adequately punished’. Suffragette activities in London were also covered in a section entitled ‘The London Letter’, but this concern seemed to focus on events at a national level rather than in Scotland. Perhaps this was a deliberate denial of activities in the area or perhaps there was little militancy in Paisley and the Renfrewshire area. There were also no instances of fires or acts of vandalism being attributed falsely to suffragettes either. In March a woman tried ‘to preach’ at the cross and someone in the crowd shouted ‘a suffragette!’ before she was ‘taken away’, but that is the only reference of this kind. Perhaps it was simply that Home Rule in Ireland, the 5 situation in Ulster and ‘the Land Question’ often proved to be more newsworthy in The Gazette. Nevertheless there were meetings of suffragists in the town, with Mrs Ethel Snowden of the NUWSS (also ILP member) addressing a large meeting ‘almost entirely comprised of ladies’ in October 1913. Mr John Arthur Brown, chairing the meeting suggested that if women had the vote ‘they might fairly anticipate that many subjects which specially concerned the welfare of women would be dealt more promptly, more sympathetically, and more practically than if they had been left to the tender mercies of mere man’. Mrs Snowden emphasised women’s respectable role as mothers and the hazards of childbirth in her speech: ‘ the special work of women in the world had been in the bearing and rearing of children, and she suggested that children were the women’s special kind of property for whom they had toiled, suffered, agonised, and died. Doctors told them that on average 5000 women each year Ethel Snowden gave their lives as a result of giving birth to children’. She also questioned why women ‘had been taught that politics for women was unwomanly’.
Recommended publications
  • Issue 61 Autumn/Winter 2009 Issn 1476-6760
    Issue 61 Autumn/Winter 2009 Issn 1476-6760 Faridullah Bezhan on Gender and Autobiography Rosalind Carr on Scottish Women and Empire Nicola Cowmeadow on Scottish Noblewomen’s Political Activity in the 18th C Katie Barclay on Family Legacies Huw Clayton on Police Brutality Allegations Plus Five book reviews Call for Reviewers Prizes WHN Conference Reports Committee News www.womenshistorynetwork.org Women’s History Network 19th Annual Conference 2009 Performing the Self: Women’s Lives in Historical Perspective University of Warwick, 10-12 September 2010 Papers are invited for the 19th Annual Conference 2010 of the Women’s History Network. The idea that selfhood is performed has a very long tradition. This interdisciplinary conference will explore the diverse representations of women’s identities in the past and consider how these were articulated. Papers are particularly encouraged which focus upon the following: ■ Writing women’s histories ■ Gender and the politics of identity ■ Ritual and performance ■ The economics of selfhood: work and identity ■ Feminism and auto/biography ■ Performing arts ■ Teaching women’s history For more information please contact Dr Sarah Richardson: [email protected], Department of History, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL. Abstracts of papers (no more than 300 words) should be submitted to [email protected] The closing date for abstracts is 5th March 2010. Conference website: www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/history/res_rec/ conferences/whn Further information and a conference call will be posted on the WHN website www.womenshistorynetwork.org Editorial elcome to the Autumn/Winter 2009 edition of reproduced in full. We plan to publish the Carol Adams WWomen’s History Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Paper and Bibliography
    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Primary Sources Books Kenney, Annie. Memories of a Militant. London: Edward Arnold & Co, 1924. Autobiography of Annie Kenney. Lytton, Constance, and Jane Warton. Prisons & Prisoners. London: William Heinemann, 1914. Personal experiences of Lady Constance Lytton. Pankhurst, Christabel. Unshackled. London: Hutchinson and Co (Publishers) Ltd, 1959. Autobiography of Christabel Pankhurst. Pankhurst, Emmeline. My Own Story. London: Hearst’s International Library Co, 1914. Autobiography of Emmeline Pankhurst. Newspaper Articles "Amazing Scenes in London." Western Daily Mercury (Plymouth), March 5, 1912. Window breaking in March 1912, leading to trials of Mrs. Pankhurst and Mr. & Mrs. Pethick- Lawrence. "The Argument of the Broken Pane." Votes for Women (London), February 23, 1912. The argument of the stone: speech delivered by Mrs Pankhurst on Feb 16, 1912 honoring released prisoners who had served two or three months for window-breaking demonstration in November 1911. "Attempt to Burn Theatre Royal." The Scotsman (Edinburgh), July 19, 1912. PM Asquith's visit hailed by Irish Nationalists, protested by Suffragettes; hatchet thrown into Mr. Asquith's carriage, attempt to burn Theatre Royal. "By the Vanload." Lancashire Daily Post (Preston), February 15, 1907. "Twenty shillings or fourteen days." The women's raid on Parliament on Feb 13, 1907: Christabel Pankhurst gets fourteen days and Sylvia Pankhurst gets 3 weeks in prison. "Coal That Cooks." The Suffragette (London), July 18, 1913. Thirst strikes. Attempts to escape from "Cat and Mouse" encounters. "Churchill Gives Explanation." Dundee Courier (Dundee), July 15, 1910. Winston Churchill's position on the Conciliation Bill. "The Ejection." Morning Post (London), October 24, 1906. 1 The day after the October 23rd Parliament session during which Premier Henry Campbell- Bannerman cold-shouldered WSPU, leading to protest led by Mrs Pankhurst that led to eleven arrests, including that of Mrs Pethick-Lawrence and gave impetus to the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Women's Party of Great Britain
    THE WOMEN’S PARTY OF GREAT BRITAIN (1917-19): A FORGOTTEN EPISODE IN BRITISH WOMEN’S POLITICAL HISTORY Article accepted for publication in June 2016 Issue of Women’s History Review, a Special Issue edited by Barbara Bush, University of Sheffield and June Purvis, University of Portsmouth, titled Connecting Women’s Histories: the local and the global, published by Routledge Abstract This article discusses the Women’s Party, founded by Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst in November 1917 at a time when Britain was still fighting in World War One. It examines the origins and aims of the Women’s Party which, with the slogan ‘Victory, National Security and Progress’, conflated the winning of the war with the women’s cause. It is contended that global politics on the world stage as well as local politics at home shaped the agenda of the Women’s Party in many differing ways. Biographical Data June Purvis is an Emeritus Professor of Women’s and Gender History at the University of Portsmouth, UK. She has published extensively on women’s education in nineteenth-century Britain and on the suffragette movement in Edwardian Britain. Her publications include the edited Women’s History Britain, 1850-1945 (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), The Women’s Suffrage Movement: new feminist perspectives (co-edited with Maroula Joannou, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998), Votes for Women co-edited with Sandra Stanley Holton,London and New York: Routledge, 2000), Emmeline Pankhurst: a biography (London and New York: Routledge, 2002) and ‘Fighting the double moral standard in Edwardian Britain: suffragette militancy, sexuality and the nation in the writings of the early twentieth-century British feminist Christabel Pankhurst’ in Francisca de Haan, Margaret Allen, June Purvis and Krassimira Daskalova (eds) Women’s Activism: global perspectives from the 1890s to the present (London and New York: Routledge, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • The, Suffragette Movement in Great Britain
    /al9 THE, SUFFRAGETTE MOVEMENT IN GREAT BRITAIN: A STUDY OF THE FACTORS INFLUENCING THE STRATEGY CHOICES OF THE WOMEN'S SOCIAL AND POLITICAL UNION, 1903-1918 THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By Derril Keith Curry Lance, B. S. Denton, Texas. December, 1977 Lance, Derril Keith Curry, The Suffragette Movement in Great Britain: A Study of the Factors Influencing the Strategy Choices of the Women's Social and Political Union, 1903-1918, Master of Science (Sociology), Decem- ber, 1977, 217 pp., 4 tables, bibliography, 99 titles. This thesis challenges the conventional wisdom that the W.S.P.U.'s strategy choices were unimportant in re- gard to winning women's suffrage. It confirms the hypo- thesis that the long-range strategy of the W.S.P.U. was to escalate coercion until the Government exhausted its powers of opposition and conceded, but to interrupt this strategy whenever favorable bargaining opportunities with the Government and third parties developed. In addition to filling an apparent research gap by systematically analyzing these choices, this thesis synthesizes and tests several piecemeal theories of social movements within the general framework of the natural history approach. The analysis utilizes data drawn from movement leaders' auto- biographies, documentary accounts of the militant movement, and the standard histories of the entire British women's suffrage movement. Additionally, extensive use is made of contemporary periodicals and miscellaneous works on related movements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . Chapter I.
    [Show full text]
  • From SUFFRAGE to CITIZENSHIP Celebrating 100 Pioneers
    From SUFFRAGE to CITIZENSHIP Celebrating 100 Pioneers Compiled by the Women’s Local Government Society with support from the Local Government Association (LGA) From SUFFRAGE to CITIZENSHIP Celebrating 100 Pioneers Foreword Foreword This project came about because of a This publication summarises the lives we Background conversation I had with Chris Williams, the discovered and some of the celebrations to former Chief Executive of Buckinghamshire mark their local impact. We hope these will County Council, about Colin Cartwright’s book have inspired a new generation of campaigners, ‘Burning to Get the Vote’. This explores the councillors and volunteers to become active in Pioneers and celebrations activities of the Women’s Suffrage Movement in their communities. central Buckinghamshire. Several years previous I would like personally to thank all those who have to that conversation, I became chairperson given their time voluntarily to reach this stage. of the Women’s Local Government Society, a Anne Baldwin, WLGS Secretary and compiler Glossary cross-party organisation celebrating the work of this book, our steering committee, especially of women as local councillors. We set out to those from the Local Government Association explore the link between the two. (LGA); Colin Cartwright and Jane Robinson, who List of pioneers I was aware of the suffrage activities of Dame assisted in compiling the list of pioneers; and Frances Dove, who founded Wycombe Abbey especially those who took the time to make Girls’ School and who almost became Mayor of nominations, sharing their enthusiasm for their High Wycombe Borough Council in 1908. She was own special pioneer. Index one of many suffrage activists who were also The Women’s Local Government Society set out active in their local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Scots Literacy
    Introduction to Speakin’ Scots Literacy Scots Guid Fer a Laugh Level 2- Pack 7 Wummin Fechter Carfuffle Gallus Bauld Mither Quines Blithe Pooer Strang Smeddum Snell Freen Doucht Setten Bonnie COONCIL 1 Introduction to Guid Fer A Laugh We are part of the City of Edinburgh Council, South West Adult Learn- ing team and usually deliver ‘Guid Fer a Laugh’ sessions for community groups in South West Edinburgh. Unfortunately, we are unable to meet groups due to Covid-19. Good news though, we have adapted some of the material and we hope you will join in at home. Development of Packs Following feedback from participants we plan to develop packs from beginner level 1 to 5 with 4 packs at each level. This will allow partic- ipants to gradually increase in confidence, recognising and under- standing Scots. By level 5, participants should be able to: read, rec- ognise, understand and write in Scots. Distribution During Covid-19 During Covid-19 restrictions we are emailing packs to community fo- rums, organisations, groups and individuals. Using the packs The packs can be done in pairs, small groups or individually. They are being used by: families, carers, support workers and individuals. The activities are suitable for all adults but particularly those who do not have access to computer and internet. Adapting Packs The packs can be adapted to suit participants needs. For example, Karen McCurry emailed saying their “Our Outreach Worker is visiting people today who live alone with no family or carers coming in, so she is going to print off booklets and do the activities with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Cat 178 Email
    WOMAN AND HER SPHERE Catalogue 176 Elizabeth Crawford 5 OWEN’S ROW LONDON ECIV 4NP TEL 020 7278 9479 Email [email protected] Visit my website: womanandhersphere.com Prices are net, postage is extra at cost. Orders will be sent at the cheapest rate, consistent with safety, unless I am instructed otherwise. Payment is due immediately on receipt of my invoice. In some cases orders will only be sent against a proforma invoice. If paying in a currency other than sterling, please add the equivalent of £9.00 to cover bank conversion charges. This is the amount my bank charges. Or you may pay me at www.Paypal.com, using my email address as the payee account If the book you order is already sold, I will, if you wish, attempt to find a replacement copy. I would be pleased to receive your ‘wants’ lists. Orders may be sent by telephone, post, or email. Image taken from item 346 The Women’s Suffrage Movement 1866-1928: A reference guide Elizabeth Crawford ‘It is no exaggeration to describe Elizabeth Crawford’s Guide as a landmark in the history of the women’s movement...’ History Today Routledge, 2000 785pp paperback £65 The Women’s Suffrage Movement in Britain and Ireland: a regional survey Elizabeth Crawford ‘Crawford provides meticulous accounts of the activists, petitions, organisations, and major events pertaining to each county.’ Victorian Studies Routledge, 2008 320pp paperback £26 Enterprising Women: the Garretts and their circle ‘Crawford’s scholarship is admirable and Enterprising Women offers increasingly compelling reading’ Journal of William Morris Studies Francis Boutle, 2002 338pp 75 illus paperback £25 Non-fiction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's Voice Anthology: 1918 Only
    Scottish Political Poetry, Song and the Franchise, 1832–1918 Anthology Poems selected and annotated by: Professor Kirstie Blair, University of Strathclyde Professor Gerard Carruthers, University of Glasgow Erin Farley, University of Strathclyde Dr Catriona M. M. Macdonald, University of Glasgow Dr Honor Rieley, University of Glasgow Dr Michael Shaw, University of Kent Part Four: Poems relating to the Representation of the People Act, 1918 87 37. Regrets. This is one of numerous political poems published in Aberdeen in 1908, when a high-profile election was held in the city to choose the rector of Aberdeen University. The candidates for this role were the reigning prime minister, Herbert Henry Asquith, and his parliamentary rival, the Unionist Edward Carson. The suffragettes despised Asquith, whom they saw as a traitor, and they agitated across the country to undermine his premiership; there is even evidence to suggest that some suffragettes were planning to assassinate him.1 This concerted effort to challenge Asquith is reflected in the Aberdeen rectorial election campaign, where the suffragettes of Aberdeen got behind Asquith’s opponent, Carson. The poem appears in the only known issue of The Suffragette, a magazine published by the Aberdeen University Woman's Suffrage Association. Asquith is the speaker of this poem, and he is branded a disloyal hypocrite. The parodic voice of Asquith states that he wishes he had got women on his side during the election campaign, as they were a substantial demographic, and he also scolds himself for forgetting the repercussions of betraying the suffragettes. Michael Shaw Air—"Sir Solomon Levi." My name is H.
    [Show full text]
  • Interdisciplinary Conference on Human Rights
    INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON HUMAN RIGHTS Organized in Prague on March 7–9, 2019 Anglo-American University, Czech Republic Norwich University, Vermont, USA STUDENT PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1st INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Partner of The Conference: The 1st Interdisciplinary Conference on Human Rights, March 7–9, 2019, Prague, Czech Republic Editors Peter Bolcha, Ph.D., Anglo-American University, Czech Republic Rowland M. Brucken, Ph.D., Norwich University, Vermont, USA Reviewers Rowland M. Brucken, Ph.D., Norwich University, Vermont, USA Michael B. McGinnis, Ph.D., Norwich University, Vermont, USA Carollann Braum, LL.M., J.D., Anglo-American University, Czech Republic Alexei Anisin, Ph.D., Anglo-American University, Czech Republic doc. Dr. Jiří Kašný, Th.D., Anglo-American University, Czech Republic Authors only are responsible for the content, bibliographical references and language correctness of this publication. © Anglo-American University / Anglo-americká vysoká škola, z.ú., Prague / Praha, 2019 Address and venue of the conference: Letenská 5, 118 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic All rights reserved ISBN 978-80-906585-8-5 The 1st Interdisciplinary Conference on Human Rights, March 7–9, 2019, Prague, Czech Republic CONTENTS Catholic Church’s Variant Perspective Shayla Moya ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Communist Use of the Police in Czechoslovakia Daniela Tupy ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Caroline's Pains and Penalties: Silence
    Queen Caroline’s Pains and Penalties: Silence and Speech in the Dramatic ArtofBritishWomen’sSuffrage Katharine Cockin Abstract: In Britain, the act that launched the militant campaign of the suffragettes in 1905 was the interruption of a political meeting in Manchester. The violent silencing and arrest of the women ensued. The women’s suffrage campaigns in Britain became more vigorous in the early twentieth cen- tury. They frequently foregrounded the oppressive silencing of women in their political speeches at public meetings, in newspapers, and in the courts. Having deliberately sought arrest, some militant suffrage activists exploited the arena of the court room to expound on their political position. In vari- ous audacious and spectacular ways, the exclusion of women from the democratic process was chal- lenged, not least by a sustained attack on the legal system. Drama, one of the more successful cultural forms of protest, was often used to expose the inequities of the existing social fabric, and as an aesthetic form it deploys the body as well as the voice. This paper will examine the forceful, antirhetorical function of silence in British women’s suffrage drama from the early twentieth century, focusing on the appropriation of Queen Caroline (1768–1821) as a silent proto-suffragette in Pains and Penalties, a play about her trial, written by Laurence Housman (1865–1959) and directed by Edith Craig for the Pioneer Players theater society. Keywords: women’ssuffragedrama/ censorship / suffragettes / trial / parliament / monarchy INTRODUCTION From politely spoken request to shrieking demand, the expression in the campaigns for women’s enfranchisement in Britain has been associated with breaking a silence in order to achieve justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender in the UK Suffrage Movement 1905-1918
    ”I Am What You Call A Hooligan”: Gender in the UK Suffrage Movement 1905-1918 Tiia Niemi Master’s Thesis General History Master’s Programme in European Studies Faculty of Arts University of Helsinki March 2018 Tiedekunta/Osasto Laitos Humanistinen tiedekunta Tekijä Tiia Niemi Työn nimi ”I Am What You Call A Hooligan”: Gender in the UK Suffrage Movement 1905-1918 Oppiaine Yleinen historia Työn laji Aika Sivumäärä Pro gradu Maaliskuu 2018 70 Tiivistelmä 1900-luvun alussa Ison-Britannian naisilla ei ollut oikeutta äänestää parlamenttivaaleissa. Useita organisaatioita syntyi kampanjoimaan äänioikeuden saavuttamiseksi. Suurimmat näistä olivat laillisia kampanjointikeinoja käyttänyt National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) sekä militantti Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU). Kyseiset organisaatiot olivat usein kovan kritiikin kohteena, sillä naisten ei kuulunut osallistua poliittiseen elämään ajan sukupuoliroolien mukaan. Tämä tutkielma tarkastelee, miten NUWSS ja WSPU määrittelivät sukupuoleen liittyviä konsepteja, kuten feminiinisyyttä ja maskuliinisuutta, vuodesta 1905 rajoitetun äänioikeuden saavuttamiseen vuonna 1918. Lähteinä käytetään äänioikeusorganisaatioiden lehtiä ja pamfletteja sekä avainjäsenten elämänkertoja ja muistelmia. Kaiken kaikkiaan organisaatioiden välillä ei ollut suuria eroja, vaikka ne käyttivät eri taktiikoita äänioikeuskampanjoinnissa. Sekä NUWSS että WSPU kyseenalaistivat yhteiskunnan jaottelun miesten ja naisten alueisiin ennen ensimmäisen maailmansodan puhkeamista vuonna 1914. Ne myös ylläpitivät
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Suffrage It Is Often Depicted As a Encompassing 'Suffrage', 'Suffragette', 'Suffragettes', Univocal, and Uniformly Hostile, Publication
    Gale Primary Sources Start at the source. Punch Case Study: Women’s Suffrage Katy Birch Aberystwyth University Various source media, Punch Historical Archive 1841-1992 EMPOWER™ RESEARCH Introduction agitation. The keyword that returned the most results was 'suffrag*'. This 'wildcard' search works by locating When Punch is mentioned in histories of the British any words that include the letters 'suffrag', campaign for women's suffrage it is often depicted as a encompassing 'suffrage', 'suffragette', 'suffragettes', univocal, and uniformly hostile, publication. In these 'suffragist', 'suffragists' and 'suffragism'. This search books 'Punch's view' of women's suffrage is often returned 511 results, which is a lot, but this could be represented by caricatures of suffragettes as refined through the use of additional keywords unattractive spinsters. For example, Jane Eldridge depending on the researcher's interests. These 511 Miller observes that Evelyn Sharp's suffragette fiction results did not represent every reference to women's resists the idea that 'suffragettes look like the suffrage during these years because they did not caricatures in Punch', without noting that Sharp herself include occasions when a word was divided because of was a Punch contributor [1]. Although such misogynistic a line break and so was not detected in the search. It caricatures did exist, a close examination was necessary to use some other keywords to find of Punch itself reveals a more nuanced additional results. Searching for 'votes for women' and picture. Punch did not express a single fixed attitude to excluding 'suffrag*' returned an additional 29 results women's suffrage, and the ideas expressed were not that had not come up in my previous search.
    [Show full text]