DOCSLIB.ORG

Helena River (Mandoon)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Helena River (Mandoon) Tributary Foreshore Assessment Report: Helena River (Mandoon) Version: 1.2 Approved by: Debbie Besch Last Updated: 31 January 2018 Custodian: Rivers and Estuaries Division Review date: Version Date approved Approved by Brief Description number DD/MM/YYYY 1.1 19/10/2017 Debbie Draft version for circulation Besch 1.2 31/1/2018 Debbie Final version for circulation Besch Tributary Foreshore Assessment: Helena River (Mandoon) Rivers and Estuaries Division January 2018 Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 Phone: (08) 9219 9000 Fax: (08) 9334 0498 www.dbca.wa.gov.au © Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions on behalf of the State of Western Australia January 2018 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. This report was prepared by Alison McGilvray and Kim Sylva, Rivers and Estuaries Division, DBCA. Questions regarding the use of this material should be directed to: Alison McGilvray Rivers and Estuaries Division Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 Phone: 08 9278 0906 Email: [email protected] The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, 2018, Tributary Foreshore Assessment Report – Helena River (Mandoon), Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Perth. Disclaimer: The Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions does not guarantee that this document is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted. This document is available in alternative formats on request. Front cover: Helena River pool, Beelu National Park. Photo – Alison McGilvray/DBCA Tributary Foreshore Assessment: Helena River (Mandoon) Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... x Summary ......................................................................................................................... xi 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Area description ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Historical context ................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Cultural values ................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Natural values .................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Major threats .................................................................................................... 11 1.6 Management structure ..................................................................................... 11 1.7 Previous assessments ..................................................................................... 16 1.8 Major land use changes since 2006 and major proposals ............................... 16 1.9 Objectives ........................................................................................................ 17 2 Method ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.1 Previous assessments ..................................................................................... 18 2.1.1 Water and Rivers Commission ............................................................. 18 2.1.2 Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) 2006 .... 18 2.1.3 Swan River Trust 2004 - 2007 .............................................................. 19 2.2 Current assessment ......................................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Desktop assessment ............................................................................ 19 2.2.2 Data collection ...................................................................................... 20 2.2.3 Field surveys ........................................................................................ 20 2.2.4 Categorisation of segments .................................................................. 21 3 Assessment results ................................................................................................... 24 3.1 Land use .......................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Bank height, slope and stability ........................................................................ 26 3.3 Vegetation type and condition .......................................................................... 38 3.4 Weed cover and species .................................................................................. 46 3.5 Level of pressure .............................................................................................. 53 3.6 Pen and Scott grade ........................................................................................ 58 3.7 Other management issues ............................................................................... 63 3.7.1 Uncontrolled access to the riverbank .................................................... 63 3.7.2 Current management concerns ............................................................ 64 3.7.3 Other issues ......................................................................................... 64 Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions ` v Tributary Foreshore Assessment: Helena River (Mandoon) 3.8 Current management responses ...................................................................... 65 3.8.1 Restoration works ................................................................................. 65 3.8.2 Fencing/stock/human exclusion from watercourse ............................... 72 4 Strategy and recommendations ................................................................................ 73 4.1 General recommendations ............................................................................... 73 4.2 Categorisation .................................................................................................. 75 4.3 Site recommendations ..................................................................................... 80 5 Assumptions and limitations of the method ............................................................... 88 Appendices ................................................................................................................... 90 References .................................................................................................................. 139 Appendices Appendix 1 Vegetation complexes within a 500m buffer of the Helena River, from Heddle et al. (1980)................................................................................................... 90 Appendix 2 - Recognised natural values adjacent to the Helena River ......................... 93 Appendix 3 - Dominant native species .......................................................................... 96 Appendix 4 - Weed species sighted .............................................................................. 98 Appendix 5 - Suggested revegetation species ............................................................ 101 Appendix 6 – Pen and Scott foreshore condition grading............................................ 119 Appendix 7 - Data dictionary for field attributes in shapefile Helena_Segments ......... 121 Appendix 8 - Parameters used for the categorisation of river segments ..................... 129 Appendix 9 - Matrix for the categorisation of river segments ....................................... 132 Appendix 10 - Ratings for individual parameters of foreshore condition used by Siemon (2001) ........................................................................................................ 133 Appendix 11 - Known project sites along the Helena River ......................................... 136 Figures Figure 1: Extent of the Helena River assessment, Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia (IBRA), Perth NRM subregions, and Swan River Trust Development Control Area (DCA). ..................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Registered Aboriginal sites within a 500m buffer of the Helena River. ............. 6 Figure 3: Vegetation complexes and IBRA regions within a 500m buffer of the Helena River. .............................................................................................................. 7 Figure 4: Recorded natural values within a 500m buffer of the Helena River, Mundaring Weir to Pumpback Dam. ........................................................................... 8 Figure 5: Recorded natural values within a 500m buffer of the Helena River, Pumpback Dam to Scott Street. .................................................................................. 9 vi Department of Biodiversity,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Helena Valley Land Use Study
    Helena Valley Land Use Study October 2013 Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS AUSTRALIA EAST PTY LTD SHIRE OF MUNDARING 38 Station Street, SUBIACO WA 6008 7000 Great Eastern Hwy, MUNDARING WA 6073 PO Box 465, SUBIACO WA 6904 T: +61 8 9290 6666 T: +61 8 9211 1111 F: +61 8 9295 3288 F: +61 8 9211 1122 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] W: www.mundaring.wa.gov.au Client Manager: Scott Vincent Report Number: PR112870-1 Version / Date: DraftB, October 2013 rpsgroup.com.au Helena Valley Land Use Study October 2013 IMPORTANT NOTE Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. All enquiries should be directed to RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. We have prepared this report for the sole purposes of SHIRE OF MUNDARING (“Client”) for the specific purpose of only for which it is supplied (“Purpose”). This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were complete, accurate and up-to-date. Where we have obtained information from a government register or database, we have assumed that the information is accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 February 2009
    Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 FEbRuARy 2009 REPORT CONTRIBUTORS: Alan Briggs Robin Chinnery Laura Colman Dr David Dolan Dr Sue Graham-Taylor A COLLABORATIVE PROJECT BY: Jenni Howlett Cheryl-Anne McCann LATITUDE CREATIVE SERVICES Brooke Mandy HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION PROFESSIONALS Gina Pickering (Project Manager) NATIONAL TRUST (WA) Rosemary Rosario Alison Storey Prepared FOR ThE EAsTERN Metropolitan REgIONAL COuNCIL ON bEhALF OF Dr Richard Walley OAM Cover image: View upstream, near Barker’s Bridge. Acknowledgements The consultants acknowledge the assistance received from the Councillors, staff and residents of the Town of Bassendean, Cities of Bayswater, Belmont and Swan and the Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council (EMRC), including Ruth Andrew, Dean Cracknell, Sally De La Cruz, Daniel Hanley, Brian Reed and Rachel Thorp; Bassendean, Bayswater, Belmont and Maylands Historical Societies, Ascot Kayak Club, Claughton Reserve Friends Group, Ellis House, Foreshore Environment Action Group, Friends of Ascot Waters and Ascot Island, Friends of Gobba Lake, Maylands Ratepayers and Residents Association, Maylands Yacht Club, Success Hill Action Group, Urban Bushland Council, Viveash Community Group, Swan Chamber of Commerce, Midland Brick and the other community members who participated in the heritage audit community consultation. Special thanks also to Anne Brake, Albert Corunna, Frances Humphries, Leoni Humphries, Oswald Humphries, Christine Lewis, Barry McGuire, May McGuire, Stephen Newby, Fred Pickett, Beverley Rebbeck, Irene Stainton, Luke Toomey, Richard Offen, Tom Perrigo and Shelley Withers for their support in this project. The views expressed in this document are the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the EMRC.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Comment Attached to Submission on Registration, from Dr Bruce Baskerville, on Proposed Listing of Guildford Historic Town, P2
    Comment attached to Submission on Registration, from Dr Bruce Baskerville, on Proposed Listing of Guildford Historic Town, P2915 Due COB Friday 19 October 2018 1. Name of item P2915 should be ‘Town of Guildford’ Guildford today is a living community and living place, it is not a historic relic frozen in time. The proposed name of Guildford Historic Town suggests otherwise. The qualifier ‘historic’ is both superfluous and misleading, suggesting the current place is a museum artefact. A ‘historic town’ may be considered as a class of category of heritage item in some statutory or community heritage systems, but that is not the same as a proper toponym or place name. The Guildford Town Trust was established in 1843, the second town trust established after Perth, and from then on at least the name Town of Guildford conveyed a sense of the importance of the town.1 In 1871 the Town Trust was replaced by a municipal council with style of the ‘The Council and Burgesses of the Town of Guildford’, and the first elections were held on 2 March 1871 for councillors.2 This was the second municipal election, after Fremantle, held under the new Municipal Institutions Act 1871. The municipal council of the Town of Guildford survived until 1961. Today, the name Town of Guildford survives in real place names such as Guildford Town Wharf, Guildford Town Hall & Library (heritage place P02460), and in business names such as Guildford Town Garden Centre. The name Town of Guildford better reflects the historical development and continuing vitality and character of the town than the proposed Guildford Historic Town name.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Land and Groundwater for Horticulture from Gingin to Augusta
    Research Library Resource management technical reports Natural resources research 1-1-1999 Coastal land and groundwater for horticulture from Gingin to Augusta Dennis Van Gool Werner Runge Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/rmtr Part of the Agriculture Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Van Gool, D, and Runge, W. (1999), Coastal land and groundwater for horticulture from Gingin to Augusta. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth. Report 188. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural resources research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resource management technical reports by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. ISSN 0729-3135 May 1999 Coastal Land and Groundwater for Horticulture from Gingin to Augusta Dennis van Gool and Werner Runge Resource Management Technical Report No. 188 LAND AND GROUNDWATER FOR HORTICULTURE Information for Readers and Contributors Scientists who wish to publish the results of their investigations have access to a large number of journals. However, for a variety of reasons the editors of most of these journals are unwilling to accept articles that are lengthy or contain information that is preliminary in nature. Nevertheless, much material of this type is of interest and value to other scientists, administrators or planners and should be published. The Resource Management Technical Report series is an avenue for the dissemination of preliminary or lengthy material relevant the management of natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Scenes
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 277 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to your submissions, we always guarantee that your feed- back goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. WRITER THANKS Steve Waters Brett Atkinson Thanks to Trace & Heath, Brodie, Abbie, Meika & Kaeghan for midnight arrivals, James, Toby, John, Thanks to Tourism WA and visitor information Sam, Lauren, Dana & the rest of MC for gorge love, Di centres and Parks and Wildlife offices throughout for making us a cuppa during the grand final, Unruly the state. Cheers to WA’s talented craft brewers Ted for getting that trivia question, Roz & Megan for for refreshment on the road, and special thanks to caretaking and especially Hamish & Kaz for sharing Tasmin Waby at Lonely Planet for another opportu- all those sunsets and sunrises and drowning out the nity to explore my spectacular neighbour.
    [Show full text]
  • Helena River
    Department of Water Swan Canning catchment Nutrient report 2011 Helena River he Helena River’s headwaters originate in Tthe Darling Scarp, before traversing the coastal plain and discharging into the upper Swan Estuary at Guildford. Piesse Gully flows through state forest and Kalamunda National Park Helena before joining Helena River just upstream of the Valley Lower Helena Pumpback Dam. Helena River is an ephemeral river system with a largely natural catchment comprising bushland, state forest and Paull’s national parks. The river’s flow regime has been Valley Legend altered and reduced by dams including the Helena River Reservoir (Mundaring Weir) and associated Monitored site Animal keeping, non-farming control structures. Offices, commercial & education Waterways & drains The area above the Lower Helena Pumpback Farm Dam is a water supply catchment for Perth and Horticulture & plantation the Goldfields region. Surface water quality is Industry & manufacturing ensured with controls over access, land use Lifestyle block / hobby farm Photo: Dieter TraceyQuarry practices and development in this part of the Recreation catchment. Conservation & natural Residential Large tracts of state forest and bushland Sewerage Transport exist in the Helena River catchment including 2 1 0 2 4 6 Greenmount, Beelu, Gooseberry Hill, Kalamunda Unused, cleared bare soil Kilometres Viticulture and a small portion of John Forrest national parks. Agricultural, light industrial and residential areas make up the remaining land use in the catchment. Helena River – facts and figures Soils in the catchment comprise shallow earths Length ~ 25.6 km (below Helena Reservoir); and sandy and lateritic gravels on the Darling ~ 57 km (total length) Scarp; sandy, gravelly soils on the foothills to Average rainfall ~ 800 mm per year the west; and alluvial red earths close to the Gauging station near Site number 616086 confluence with the Swan.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Heritage Places - Assessment Documentation
    REGISTER OF HERITAGE PLACES - ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION 11. ASSESSMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE The criteria adopted by the Heritage Council in November 1996 have been used to determine the cultural heritage significance of the place. PRINCIPAL AUSTRALIAN HISTORIC THEME(S) • 3.11.5 Establishing water supplies • 3.21 Entertaining for profit • 3.22 Lodging people • 3.23 Catering for tourists • 8.1.4 Enjoying the natural environment • 8.3 Going on holiday HERITAGE COUNCIL OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA THEME(S) • 106 Workers • 107 Settlements • 206 Mail services • 311 Hospitality industry and tourism • 506 Tourism • 605 Famous and infamous people 11. 1 AESTHETIC VALUE* Mundaring Weir Hotel is a good example of a hotel in the Federation Filigree style, featuring shady verandahs and lattice screens, with its decorative ground floor verandah valance, stop chamfered posts with the timber brackets, and pebble dash decoration to the gable on the south-east corner of the building. (Criterion 1.2) The c.1906 addition presents as a balanced façade with interesting highlights provided by the roof elements which include ventilated hipped gables, a parapet wall with small pediment and intact chimney stacks with pots. (Criterion 1.3) * For consistency, all references to architectural style are taken from Apperly, Richard; Irving, Robert and Reynolds, Peter A Pictorial Guide to Identifying Australian Architecture: Styles and Terms from 1788 to the Present , Angus & Robertson, North Ryde, 1989. Register of Heritage Places - Assessment Doc’n Mundaring Weir Hotel 1 20/04/2004 Mundaring Weir Hotel is an element of a small cultural precinct, together with 1903 workers’ accommodation across the road, and the Mundaring Weir Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Study of Organic Contaminants in the Swan and Canning Catchment Drainage System Using Passive Sampling Devices
    Government of Western Australia Department of Water A baseline study of organic contaminants in the Swan and Canning catchment drainage system using passive sampling devices Looking after all our water needs Water This report was prepared by the technical series Department of Water for the Report no. WST 5 Swan River Trust. December 2009Science A baseline study of organic contaminants in the Swan and Canning catchment drainage system using passive sampling devices Department of Water Water Science technical series Report No. 5 December 2009 Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 www.water.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia 2009 December 2009 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Water. ISSN: 1836-2869 (print) ISSN: 1836-2877 (online) ISBN: 978-1-921549-61-8 (print) ISBN: 978-1-921549-62-5 (online) Acknowledgements This project was funded by the Government of Western Australia through the Swan River Trust. This was a collaborative research project between The Department of Water and the National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology (EnTox). Cover photo: Swan River at the confluence of the Helena River by D. Tracey. Citation details The recommended citation for this publication is: Foulsham, G, Nice, HE, Fisher, S, Mueller, J, Bartkow, M, & Komorova, T 2009, A baseline study of organic contaminants in the Swan and Canning catchment drainage system using passive sampling devices, Water Science Technical Series Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Parks and Wildlife 2014–15 Annual Report Acknowledgments
    Department of Parks and Wildlife 2014–15 Annual Report Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Public About the Department’s logo Information and Corporate Affairs Branch of the Department of Parks and Wildlife. The design is a stylised representation of a bottlebrush, or Callistemon, a group of native For more information contact: plants including some found only in Western Department of Parks and Wildlife Australia. The orange colour also references 17 Dick Perry Avenue the WA Christmas tree, or Nuytsia. Technology Park, Western Precinct Kensington Western Australia 6151 WA’s native flora supports our diverse fauna, is central to Aboriginal people’s idea of country, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre and attracts visitors from around the world. Western Australia 6983 The leaves have been exaggerated slightly to suggest a boomerang and ocean waves. Telephone: (08) 9219 9000 The blue background also refers to our marine Email: [email protected] parks and wildlife. The design therefore symbolises key activities of the Department The recommended reference for this of Parks and Wildlife. publication is: Department of Parks and Wildlife 2014–15 The logo was designed by the Department’s Annual Report, Department of Parks and senior graphic designer and production Wildlife, 2015 coordinator, Natalie Curtis. ISSN 2203-9198 (Print) ISSN 2203-9201 (Online) Front cover: Granite Skywalk, Porongurup National Park. September 2015 Photo – Andrew Halsall Copies of this document are available Back cover: Osprey Bay campground at night, in alternative formats on request. Cape Range National Park. Photo – Peter Nicholas/Parks and Wildlife Sturt’s desert pea, Millstream Chichester National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Mundaring with Images
    There’s more to Mundaring! This month’s Feature Blog centres around Mundaring – The Heart of the Perth Hills Mundaring Weir and the No 1 Pump Station is often the first thing that comes to mind when people hear the word Mundaring. Steeped in history and a little bit of controversy, Mundaring Weir is one of Western Australia’s most significant historical sites and the world’s most incredible engineering feats, built by C.Y. O’Connor in the 1890s to pump water from Mundaring to Kalgoorlie, almost 600km away. The No 1 Pump Station, located at the foot of the Weir, now serves as a museum where you can learn more about the project and the life of C.Y. O'Connor. Surrounding Mundaring Weir is the Mundaring Weir Interpretation Precinct, where you can also discover fun facts about the history of the project via signs and sculptures nestled amongst play equipment, picnic tables and barbeques. Starting at the No 1 Pump Station is The Golden Pipeline, a 650km driving adventure that follows what was, at the time of its completion, the longest freshwater water pipeline in the world. Taking three to five days, the trail follows the pipeline taking in historical sites and natural wonders along the way. For those that would like to stay closer to the Weir, we recommend the walking trail between Perth Hills Discovery Centre to Golden View Lookout in Beelu National Park, providing breathtaking views of Mundaring Weir. Other trails in Mundaring include the Railway Reserves Heritage Trail a unique 41km loop entirely on railway formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadside Vegetation and Conservation Values in the Shire Of
    RRooaaddssiiddee VVeeggeettaattiioonn aanndd CCoonnsseerrvvaattiioonn VVaalluueess iinn tthhee SShhiirree ooff SSeerrppeennttiinnee--JJaarrrraahhddaallee Photo by P. Haro December 2006 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 PART A: OVERVIEW OF ROADSIDE CONSERVATION 2 1.0 Why is Roadside Vegetation Important? 3 2.0 What are the Threats? 4 2.1 Lack of Awareness 4 2.2 Roadside Clearing 4 2.3 Fire 5 2.4 Weeds 6 2.5 Salinity 7 3.0 Legislative Requirements 8 4.0 Environmentally Sensitive Areas 9 5.0 Flora Roads 10 PART B: THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT IN SERPENTINE-JARRAHDALE 11 1.0 Flora 12 2.0 Declared Rare Flora (DRF) 12 3.0 Fauna 14 4.0 Remnant Vegetation Cover 17 PART C: ROADSIDE SURVEYS IN THE SHIRE OF SERPENTINE-JARRAHDALE 18 1.0 Introduction 19 1.1 Methods 19 1.2 Mapping Roadside Conservation Values 20 1.3 Roadside Conservation Value Categories 20 2.0 Using the Roadside Conservation Value Map (RCV) Map 22 3.0 Results 24 PART D: ROADSIDE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 31 1.0 Management Recommendations 32 2.0 Minimising Disturbance 33 3.0 Planning for Roadsides 34 4.0 Setting Objectives 34 REFERENCES 35 FIGURES Figure 1. Native vegetation on roadsides in the Shire of Serpentine-Jarrahdale. Figure 2. Number of native plant species in roadsides in the Shire of Serpentine-Jarrahdale. Figure 3. Extent of native vegetation in roadsides in the Shire of Serpentine-Jarrahdale. Figure 4. Roadside vegetation value as a biological corridor in the Shire of Serpentine- Jarrahdale. Figure 5. Weed infestation along roadsides in the Shire of Serpentine-Jarrahdale. Figure 6.
    [Show full text]
  • OVER the (20 Mile) LIMIT
    In 1921 the hotel was de-licensed. Following a petition from 6. The Mahogany residents testifying to the important community function OVER THE Inn, 17 miles as served by the hotel, the licence was restored in 1927. The the crow flies, 16 following year, the single-story hotel was rebuilt at a cost of (20 mile) LIMIT miles by road £7,000 (c. $540 000) to become the two-storey brick build- Mahogany Inn is the ing it is today. oldest hotel on what was York Road, now From 1962 the Parkerville Tavern, as it became known in Great Eastern 1978, was legally able to sell alcohol on Sundays. Highway. The Inn started life as a *8. John Forrest Tavern, 15 miles as the crow military barracks, flies, 19 miles by road Mahogany Inn, picture by Frank Pash. protecting travellers. The John Forrest Tavern opened in 1978, after the 1970 Act In 1843 the building operated as a wayside house, able to allowed all hotels to open on Sundays. sell alcohol. The next year, Edward Byfield was granted a Publican’s Licence and named the inn ‘The Prince of Wales’. From 1855 until 1922, buying alcohol on Sundays from In the 1850s Byfield built the older sections of the Inn we see licensed premises in Perth was illegal, unless you were a bona today. After his death in 1863, the Inn had a number of fide traveller or lodger. licensees until in 1884 it was sold to Stephen Parker and used as a private residence. It was only in 1991 that the Inn In 1922, a licensing amendment allowed hotels that were 20 was again serving alcohol.
    [Show full text]