DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Authority Next Major Public Water Supply Source For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Authority Next Major Public Water Supply Source For 6 Water Authority Next Major Public Water Supply Source for Perth (post 1992) Environmental Review and Management Programme Stage 1: Evaluation of Alternatives Supporting Document Next Major Water Supply Source for Perth Preliminary Assessment of Social/Recreational Impacts ti111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Feilman Planning Consultants 901 328/4 February 1987 ent of Environmental Protection Library 'ThOrnTY 6 Water Authority of Western Australia WATER RESOURCES DIRECTORATE Water Resources Planning Branch Next Major Public Water Supply Source for Perth (post 1992) Environmental Review and Management Programme Stage 1: Evaluation of Alternatives Supporting Document Next Major Water Supply Source for Perth Preliminary Assessment of Social/Recreational Impacts Published by the Water Authority of Western Australia John Tonkin Water Centre ISBN for complete set of 7 volumes 629 Newcastle Street 0 7309 1724 X Leederville WA 6007 ISBN for this volume 0 7309 1727 4 Telephone: (09) 420 2420 February 1987 This report is published by the Water Authority of Western Australia as a technical supporting document to the Environmental Review and Management Programme, Stage 1 report titled 'Next Major Public Water Supply Source for Perth (post 1992)'. The document published withm these covers isacopy of the Consultant's report to the Water Authority. As such, the Consultant is responsible for the accuracy of the information and statements contained in the report which constitutes specialist technical advice to the Authority. The Water Authority acknowledges the work of the Consultants for the efficient manner in which they undertook their investigations and provided their advice to the Authority. NEXT MAJOR WATER SUPPLY SOURCE FOR PERTH PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL/RECREATIONAL IMPACTS Prepared for:- WATER AUTHORITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA FEILMAN PLANNING CONSULTANTS FEBRUARY, 1987 CONTENTS 1.1 BACKGROUND 1.2 STUDY OBJECTIVE 1.2.1 Specific Objectives 1.3 METHODOLOGY 2.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND USE 2.1 MUNDARING WEIR/HELENA RESERVOIR/HELENA CATCHMEN1 AND ENVIRONS 2.1.1 Existing Environment 2.1.2 Land Use and Management 2.1.3 Recreation Use 2.2 CANNING DAM/CANNING RESERVOIR/NORTH WESTERN SECTOR - CANNING CATCHMENT 10 2.2.1 Existing Environment 10 2.2.2 Land Use and Management 10 2.2.3 Recreation Use 11 2.3 SOUTH CANNING RIVER/SOUTH CANNING CATCHMENT 13 2.3.1 Existing Environment 13 2.3.2 Land Use and Management 14 2.3.3 Recreation Use 15 2.4 NORTH DANDALUP CATCHMENT 16 2.4.1 Existing Environment 16 2.4.2 Land Use and Management 16 2.4.3 Recreation Use 17 2.5 SUMMARY 17 3.0 REGIONAL DEMAND FOR RECREATION 19 3.1 TRENDS WITHIN SYSTEM 6 19 3.2 FOREST VISITOR SURVEY 1980 20 3.3 OTHER RELEVANT RECREATION STUDIES 23 3.4 SUMMARY 24 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS AND IMPACTS AND ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS ON THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT AND RECREATIONAL USE OF THESE RESOURCES 26 4.1 PROPOSED RAISING OF MUNDARING WEIR - IMPACT ON THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT AND RECREATION 26 4.1.1 Project Details 26 4.1.2 Impacts 27 4.1.3 Overview 28 4.2 PROPOSED RAISING OF CANNING DAM - IMPACT ON THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT AND RECREATION 30 4.2.1 Project Details 30 4.2.2 Impacts 31 4.2.3 Overview 32 4.3 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DAM ON THE SOUTH CANNING RIVER - IMPACT ON THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT AND RECREATION 34 4.3.1 Project Details 34 4.3.2 Impacts 36 4.3.3 Overview 40 4.4 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DAM ON THE NORTH DANDALUP RIVER - IMPACT ON THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT AND RECREATION 42 4.4.1 Project Details 42 4.4.2 Impacts 43 4.4.3 Overview 45 4.5 SOCIAL/RECREATIONAL BENEFITS AND CONFLICTS AND RANKING OF THE PROPOSED OPTIONS 47 4.5.1 Preferred Option 48 4.5.2 Ranking of Remaining Alternative Sources 48 5.0 REVIEW OF PREFERRED OPTION AND RANKING OF ALTERNATIVE SOURCES USING WATER AUTHORITY'S RIVERS AND WETLANDS ASSESSMENT METHOD 50 5.1 PLANNING STUDY OF RIVER REACHES AND WETLANDS OF RECREATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE - PERTH TO BUNBURY REGION 50 5.1.1 Methodology 50 5.1.2 Application of The Method - Helena, Canning, South Canning , North Dandalup Catchments. 52 5.1.3 Summary of 'Rivers and Wetlands' Method Assessment And Relevance To The Study 55 6.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS 56 7.0 REFERENCES TABLES TABLE 3.2 (a) FORESTS DEPARTMENT ESTIMATE OF RECREATIONAL USE OF STATE FOREST 21 TABLE 3.2(b) AVERAGE NUMBER OF VISITS TO STATE FOREST PER ANNUM BY PERSONS INTERVIEWED .22 TABLE 3.3(a) WAROONA/LOGUE BROOK RESERVOIR - PUBLIC USAGE SURVEY RESULTS EASTER 1985 24 TABLE 4.3.1 CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING DARLING RANGE RESERVOIRS 34 TABLE 5.1.2(a) POTENTIAL NUMBER OF SUITABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES BY SOURCE WITHOUT EXISTING STATUTORY REGULATIONS AND OTHER SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS CONSIDERED 52 TABLE 5.1.2(b) RANKING OF RIVERS AND WETLANDS PERTH-BUNBURY REGION FOR RECREATION SUITABILITY WITHOUT EXISTING STATUTORY REGULATIONS AND OTHER SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS CONSIDERED 53 1 1.0 PRELIMINARY 1.1 BACKGROUND Four future hills water supply source alternatives for the Perth Metropolitan Region are currently being reviewed by the Water Authority of Western Australia. It is expected that one of these options will need to be commissioned in the early 1990s if the Authority is to meet urban demand for water without reducing the reliability of supply. The four options (Plan 1 refers) are: The raising of the existing Mundaring Weir The raising of the existing Canning Dam. The construction of a new dam on the South Canning River upstream from Canning Dam. The construction of a new dam on the North Dandalup River upstream from the existing North Dandalup Pipehead Dam. The Authority has undertaken to evaluate the economic, environmental and social/recreational impact of each proposal. 1.2 STUDY OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this Study is to describe the social/recreational environment of the four project areas in sufficient detail to form an input to: A multi-objective analysis of the alternative sources to choose the option which best balances the engineering, technical, economic, social, recre- ational and environmental considerations resulting from the development of the next major source. An Environmental Review and Management Programme documenting the impacts of the development of each source, thereby enabling the selection of the preferred option for development 1.2.1 Specific Objectives Detailed objectives of this Study are:- To describe the existing and potential social/ recreational use of each of the project areas. To assess the losses of social/recreational poten- tial arising from the development of the water sources. To describe the social/recreational opportunities created by the development of each source. To reach conclusions about the relative significance of each development option to social/recreational activity and/or potential. 1.3 METHODOLOGY The conduct of this preliminary Study involved: Collection and review of relevant literature and data. Meetings with Officers of the Water Authority of Western Australia, the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM), the Department of Sport and Recreation, and State Planning Commission. Meetings with Officers of the Shires of Mundaring, Kalamunda, Wandering and Murray and the City of Armadale. Liaison with representatives of the Department of Conservation and Environment, Western Australian Tourism Commission, National Trust of Australia (W.A.), Western Australian Heritage Committee. Liaison with representatives of various recreational organisations. Site inspections. Analysis of the potential of each site using recently developed techniques to quantitatively assess recreation potential. 3 ISTING ENVIRONMENT AND USE i considering the four proposed projects the Water ithority of Western Australia's Helena, Canning, South inning and North Dandalup catchment areas were reviewed the primary study areas. The immediate environments )wnstream of the damsites are also discussed (Plan 1 fers) there are only two State Government agencies, the Water Authority of Western Australia and the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) with statutory control over the catchment areas and the environs down- stream of the dams, which are the subject of this study, a brief description of their responsibilities is detailed below: Water Supply Catchments Through the Metropolitan Water Supply, Sewerage and Drainage Act, 1982 and the Country Areas Water Supply Act 1980, the Western Australian Water Authority has drafted by-laws to safeguard the quality of stream water and storages within catchment areas. Current policy forrnu- lated for the regulation of public access on hills catch- ments is categorised as follows (WAWRC, 1984): Class I - Developed Catchment - Small Domestic Diversion Dam. These catchments and reservoirs are generally small, therefore susceptible to pollution. Thus vehicular and pedestrian access is only permit- ted along open roads, marked walk trails and desig- nated picnic areas. Public access to these reservoirs is prohibited. Access to the dam walls is generally also not permitted (e.g. Churchman Brook). Class II - Developed Catchment - large Domestic Dam. General access to the dam walls is permitted. Within two kilometres of these reservoirs, pedes- trian access is permitted along open roads, marked walk trails and at designated picnic areas only. Unrestricted pedestrian access is permitted outside the two kilometre band around the reservoirs. Vehicular access is permitted on public roads, open tracks and designated dam access roads only (e.g. Canning). Class III - Developed Catchment. Irrigation Dam. Pedestrian access to these reservoirs (except, for safety reasons, the area within 250m upstream of the dam wall), the dam walls, and the catchment areas is permitted. Vehicular access is only per- mitted on public roads, open tracks and designated dam access roads (e.g. Waroona). 4 Class IV - Undeveloped Catchment. Selected a. are designated as undeveloped catchments in order to meet future needs. Pedestrian access to these catchments is permitted (e.g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Helena Valley Land Use Study
    Helena Valley Land Use Study October 2013 Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS AUSTRALIA EAST PTY LTD SHIRE OF MUNDARING 38 Station Street, SUBIACO WA 6008 7000 Great Eastern Hwy, MUNDARING WA 6073 PO Box 465, SUBIACO WA 6904 T: +61 8 9290 6666 T: +61 8 9211 1111 F: +61 8 9295 3288 F: +61 8 9211 1122 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] W: www.mundaring.wa.gov.au Client Manager: Scott Vincent Report Number: PR112870-1 Version / Date: DraftB, October 2013 rpsgroup.com.au Helena Valley Land Use Study October 2013 IMPORTANT NOTE Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. All enquiries should be directed to RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. We have prepared this report for the sole purposes of SHIRE OF MUNDARING (“Client”) for the specific purpose of only for which it is supplied (“Purpose”). This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were complete, accurate and up-to-date. Where we have obtained information from a government register or database, we have assumed that the information is accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 February 2009
    Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 FEbRuARy 2009 REPORT CONTRIBUTORS: Alan Briggs Robin Chinnery Laura Colman Dr David Dolan Dr Sue Graham-Taylor A COLLABORATIVE PROJECT BY: Jenni Howlett Cheryl-Anne McCann LATITUDE CREATIVE SERVICES Brooke Mandy HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION PROFESSIONALS Gina Pickering (Project Manager) NATIONAL TRUST (WA) Rosemary Rosario Alison Storey Prepared FOR ThE EAsTERN Metropolitan REgIONAL COuNCIL ON bEhALF OF Dr Richard Walley OAM Cover image: View upstream, near Barker’s Bridge. Acknowledgements The consultants acknowledge the assistance received from the Councillors, staff and residents of the Town of Bassendean, Cities of Bayswater, Belmont and Swan and the Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council (EMRC), including Ruth Andrew, Dean Cracknell, Sally De La Cruz, Daniel Hanley, Brian Reed and Rachel Thorp; Bassendean, Bayswater, Belmont and Maylands Historical Societies, Ascot Kayak Club, Claughton Reserve Friends Group, Ellis House, Foreshore Environment Action Group, Friends of Ascot Waters and Ascot Island, Friends of Gobba Lake, Maylands Ratepayers and Residents Association, Maylands Yacht Club, Success Hill Action Group, Urban Bushland Council, Viveash Community Group, Swan Chamber of Commerce, Midland Brick and the other community members who participated in the heritage audit community consultation. Special thanks also to Anne Brake, Albert Corunna, Frances Humphries, Leoni Humphries, Oswald Humphries, Christine Lewis, Barry McGuire, May McGuire, Stephen Newby, Fred Pickett, Beverley Rebbeck, Irene Stainton, Luke Toomey, Richard Offen, Tom Perrigo and Shelley Withers for their support in this project. The views expressed in this document are the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the EMRC.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Comment Attached to Submission on Registration, from Dr Bruce Baskerville, on Proposed Listing of Guildford Historic Town, P2
    Comment attached to Submission on Registration, from Dr Bruce Baskerville, on Proposed Listing of Guildford Historic Town, P2915 Due COB Friday 19 October 2018 1. Name of item P2915 should be ‘Town of Guildford’ Guildford today is a living community and living place, it is not a historic relic frozen in time. The proposed name of Guildford Historic Town suggests otherwise. The qualifier ‘historic’ is both superfluous and misleading, suggesting the current place is a museum artefact. A ‘historic town’ may be considered as a class of category of heritage item in some statutory or community heritage systems, but that is not the same as a proper toponym or place name. The Guildford Town Trust was established in 1843, the second town trust established after Perth, and from then on at least the name Town of Guildford conveyed a sense of the importance of the town.1 In 1871 the Town Trust was replaced by a municipal council with style of the ‘The Council and Burgesses of the Town of Guildford’, and the first elections were held on 2 March 1871 for councillors.2 This was the second municipal election, after Fremantle, held under the new Municipal Institutions Act 1871. The municipal council of the Town of Guildford survived until 1961. Today, the name Town of Guildford survives in real place names such as Guildford Town Wharf, Guildford Town Hall & Library (heritage place P02460), and in business names such as Guildford Town Garden Centre. The name Town of Guildford better reflects the historical development and continuing vitality and character of the town than the proposed Guildford Historic Town name.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Land and Groundwater for Horticulture from Gingin to Augusta
    Research Library Resource management technical reports Natural resources research 1-1-1999 Coastal land and groundwater for horticulture from Gingin to Augusta Dennis Van Gool Werner Runge Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/rmtr Part of the Agriculture Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Van Gool, D, and Runge, W. (1999), Coastal land and groundwater for horticulture from Gingin to Augusta. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth. Report 188. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural resources research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resource management technical reports by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. ISSN 0729-3135 May 1999 Coastal Land and Groundwater for Horticulture from Gingin to Augusta Dennis van Gool and Werner Runge Resource Management Technical Report No. 188 LAND AND GROUNDWATER FOR HORTICULTURE Information for Readers and Contributors Scientists who wish to publish the results of their investigations have access to a large number of journals. However, for a variety of reasons the editors of most of these journals are unwilling to accept articles that are lengthy or contain information that is preliminary in nature. Nevertheless, much material of this type is of interest and value to other scientists, administrators or planners and should be published. The Resource Management Technical Report series is an avenue for the dissemination of preliminary or lengthy material relevant the management of natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Helena River
    Department of Water Swan Canning catchment Nutrient report 2011 Helena River he Helena River’s headwaters originate in Tthe Darling Scarp, before traversing the coastal plain and discharging into the upper Swan Estuary at Guildford. Piesse Gully flows through state forest and Kalamunda National Park Helena before joining Helena River just upstream of the Valley Lower Helena Pumpback Dam. Helena River is an ephemeral river system with a largely natural catchment comprising bushland, state forest and Paull’s national parks. The river’s flow regime has been Valley Legend altered and reduced by dams including the Helena River Reservoir (Mundaring Weir) and associated Monitored site Animal keeping, non-farming control structures. Offices, commercial & education Waterways & drains The area above the Lower Helena Pumpback Farm Dam is a water supply catchment for Perth and Horticulture & plantation the Goldfields region. Surface water quality is Industry & manufacturing ensured with controls over access, land use Lifestyle block / hobby farm Photo: Dieter TraceyQuarry practices and development in this part of the Recreation catchment. Conservation & natural Residential Large tracts of state forest and bushland Sewerage Transport exist in the Helena River catchment including 2 1 0 2 4 6 Greenmount, Beelu, Gooseberry Hill, Kalamunda Unused, cleared bare soil Kilometres Viticulture and a small portion of John Forrest national parks. Agricultural, light industrial and residential areas make up the remaining land use in the catchment. Helena River – facts and figures Soils in the catchment comprise shallow earths Length ~ 25.6 km (below Helena Reservoir); and sandy and lateritic gravels on the Darling ~ 57 km (total length) Scarp; sandy, gravelly soils on the foothills to Average rainfall ~ 800 mm per year the west; and alluvial red earths close to the Gauging station near Site number 616086 confluence with the Swan.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission of Form BA20 Notice of Consent to the Department of Housing
    Submission of Form BA20 Notice of Consent to the Department of Housing The following contact details should be used in relation to obtaining written consent from the Department of Housing as the adjoining property owner along a shared property boundary. 1. Where the Department of Housing property is occupied or construction has been completed the attached list of suburbs should be used to identify the Regional Office responsible for that suburb. The Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation should be submitted to the Regional Manager using the details provided for that particular office. 2. Where construction has not yet commenced on the Department of Housing property or where construction is still in progress then the Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation should be submitted to the Manager Professional Services using the details provided. NOTE – Approval will be delayed if the Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation is not submitted to the correct processing area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Study of Organic Contaminants in the Swan and Canning Catchment Drainage System Using Passive Sampling Devices
    Government of Western Australia Department of Water A baseline study of organic contaminants in the Swan and Canning catchment drainage system using passive sampling devices Looking after all our water needs Water This report was prepared by the technical series Department of Water for the Report no. WST 5 Swan River Trust. December 2009Science A baseline study of organic contaminants in the Swan and Canning catchment drainage system using passive sampling devices Department of Water Water Science technical series Report No. 5 December 2009 Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 www.water.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia 2009 December 2009 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Water. ISSN: 1836-2869 (print) ISSN: 1836-2877 (online) ISBN: 978-1-921549-61-8 (print) ISBN: 978-1-921549-62-5 (online) Acknowledgements This project was funded by the Government of Western Australia through the Swan River Trust. This was a collaborative research project between The Department of Water and the National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology (EnTox). Cover photo: Swan River at the confluence of the Helena River by D. Tracey. Citation details The recommended citation for this publication is: Foulsham, G, Nice, HE, Fisher, S, Mueller, J, Bartkow, M, & Komorova, T 2009, A baseline study of organic contaminants in the Swan and Canning catchment drainage system using passive sampling devices, Water Science Technical Series Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Values, Flow Related Issues and Objectives for the Upper
    Environmental values, flow related issues and objectives for the Canning River, Western Australia From the Canning Dam to Kent St Weir Department of Water Environmental Water Report Series Report No. EWR5 May 2007 Environmental Water Report No. 5 Canning values and issues report Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 <www.water.wa.gov.au> Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 For more information contact: Laurence Radin Water Resource Division, Department of Water PO Box K822 Perth Western Australia 6842 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by: Laurence Radin, Kylie La Spina, Mike Braimbridge and Ben Malseed, Environmental Water Planning. Comments on the early draft by Dr Andrew Storey are greatly appreciated as are contributions made throughout the project by Dr Storey. The assistance and advice provided by Mark Pearcey and others from the Department of Water, Surface Water Hydrology group is also acknowledged and appreciated. ISSN 1833-6582 (pbk.). Printed on recycled paper. May, 2007 Subject of cover photograph Freshwater cobbler (Tandanus bostocki) Department of Water ii Environmental Water Report No. 5 Canning values and issues report Contents Contents......................................................................................................................iii Summary..................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Information for Management in the Upper Canning
    GROUNDWATER INFORMATION FOR MANAGEMENT OF THE UPPER CANNING SOUTHERN WUNGONG CATCHMENT Salinity and Land Use Impacts Series Upper Canning Southern Wungong Catchment SLUI 14 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION FOR MANAGEMENT OF THE UPPER CANNING SOUTHERN WUNGONG CATCHMENT by R. A. Smith, R. Shams and A. M. Waterhouse Resource Science Division Water and Rivers Commission WATER AND RIVERS COMMISSION SALINITY AND LAND USE IMPACTS SERIES REPORT NO. SLUI 14 OCTOBER 2002 i Upper Canning Southern Wungong Catchment SLUI 14 Salinity and Land Use Impacts Series Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge help and advice from; The Advisory Committee (below) to the Swan Hydrogeological Resource Base and Catchment Interpretation Project Department Representative Agriculture Western Australia Gerry Parlevliet Conservation and Land Management Rob Towers Community Peter Murray (Chair) CSIRO Dr John Adeney Edith Cowan University Dr Ray Froend Environmental Protection Authority Wes Horwood, Jane Taylor Local Government Authority Mick McCarthy, Veronica Oma Ministry for Planning David Nunn, Marie Ward, Alan Carman-Brown Swan Catchment Centre Peter Nash Swan River Trust Dr Tom Rose, Declan Morgan, Adrian Tomlinson Mr Ken Angel (Agriculture Western Australia), Mr Robert Panasiewicz (formerly Water and Rivers Commission), and Mr Syl Kubicki (formerly Water and Rivers Commission). Recommended Reference SMITH, R. A., SHAMS, R., and WATERHOUSE, A. M., 2002, Groundwater information for management in the Upper Canning Southern Wungong catchment: Western Australia, Water and Rivers
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Knowledge on the Effect of Key Disturbances on Aquatic Invertebrates and Fish in the South-West Forest Region of Western Australia
    A Review of Knowledge on the Effect of Key Disturbances on Aquatic Invertebrates and Fish in the South-west Forest Region of Western Australia By P. Horwitz1, E. Jasinska 1, E. Fairhurst2 and J.A. Davis2 1 Centre for Ecosystem Management, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027 2 School of Biological Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150 A Report Prepared for ENVIRONMENT AUSTRALIA Environment Forest Taskforce October 1997 1 1. INTRODUCTION, RATIONALE AND APPROACH The present report is a review of the knowledge of the effects of key disturbances on the aquatic invertebrates and fish in the south-west forest region of Western Australia. The aims of the review were to: A) review and collate all available information on the impact of disturbances, including single and multiple disturbance effects, on species and communities of aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish; B) where information is available, describe the recovery of species and communities from the disturbance and identify management actions which will ameliorate the negative impacts of disturbances on species and communities; C) where appropriate, provide summary statements of the best available knowledge; D) identify gaps in knowledge on the subject of impacts of disturbances and recommend directions for future research; E) provide recommendations for the management of aquatic invertebrates and fish with regard to each disturbance type. The area/region covered by this review includes the high rainfal region of south-west Australia, principally that area defined for the Regional Forest Agreement (the bioregions of Jarrah and Warren). This review also draws on information which has been compiled for locations adjacent to these two bioregions, for the following reasons: • similar threatening processes are likely to be operative both outside and inside these bioregions; • forests occur outside these two bioregions (for instance tuart forests and pine forests), and • populations of species may occur across the nominal bioregional boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Freshwater Flows and Salinity on Phytoplankton Biomass and Composition in an Urban Estuary, the Swan River, Western Australia
    preprint – 1 of 7 The Effects of Freshwater Flows and Salinity on Phytoplankton Biomass and Composition in an Urban Estuary, The Swan River, Western Australia D. P. Hamilton, T. U. Chan, B. J. Robson and B. R. Hodges1 Centre for Water Research, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia ABSTRACT Estuarine residence times regulate not only biomass, but also phytoplankton succession. In the Swan River estuary, Western Australia, dinoflagellate and marine diatoms tend to dominate during periods of low flow and high residence times, whereas the faster-growing freshwater diatoms and chlorophytes are associated with higher flow rates. Modifications to the estuary and its catchment area over the last century have considerably reduced residence times and may favour dinoflagellate and marine diatom dominated populations. Anecdotal evidence also suggests a greater regularity of summer blooms dominated by these groups in recent years. INTRODUCTION A number of factors make estuaries particularly vulnerable to eutrophication and algal blooms. First, human populations tend to proliferate around estuary margins, often leading to increases in land disturbance and nutrient inputs (Boynton et al., 1992). For example, Australia's geographic demography is associated with high concentrations of population along coastal land margins relative to inland areas and the arid interior in particular. Estuaries are sometimes considered to be the terminal repository for much of the sediment and nutrients derived from terrestrial sources via tributary inflows. They may therefore act to filter sediments and nutrients from inputs to adjoining coastal systems, provided that processes of burial and immobilisation of nutrients are maintained (Fisher et al., 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Birdwatching Around Perth Hills Mundaring
    For any of the trails mentioned: The Shire of Mundaring, little more than 20km east of Perth, includes 238km² of forests and national parks, • Sturdy shoes are recommended; be wary of loose mostly Jarrah and Marri, with some Wandoo and Birdwatching gravel and Marri Tree ‘honky nuts’: both can be Powderbark Wandoo. It offers many walk trails in both treacherous for the unwary. natural and historical reserves and the opportunity to • Expect other trail users (many are multi-use trails). see several species not often found on the coastal plain around Perth Hills • Check fire / weather warnings www.bom.gov.au and such as Scarlet Robin and Golden Whistler. www.emergency.wa.gov.au • Carry drinking water if doing a long walk. Mundaring • Tell someone where you are going. • Dieback is prevalent in some areas. Please obey any signs. Contacts: Further information is available from the Mundaring Visitor Centre or Shire of Mundaring www.trailswa.com.au Shire website: www.mundaring.wa.gov.au Rufous Phone (08) 9290 6666 in office hours. Whistler (male) Mundaring Visitor Centre, The Old School, 1. Mundaring Town: 7225 Great Eastern Hwy; phone: (08) 9290 6645 a. Railway Reserves Heritage Trail: A 41km loop trail along the old Acknowledgements: Eastern Railway between Bellevue and Chidlow; easy Illustrations by Judy Blyth, Eric Tan, Susan Tingay walking with some gentle inclines. The majority of the trail is accessible to walkers, cyclists and horses but Cover photograph by John Baas peripheral bushland offers opportunities to see a variety of birds. Guide No. 73AB Revised September 2019 As well as Mundaring Community Sculpture Park All content is subject to copyright ©.
    [Show full text]