Model Memorandum of Agreement
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Advanced Practice Provider (APRN & PA) Leadership Summit
Hosted by: 12th Annual Advanced Practice Provider (APRN & PA) Leadership Summit September 11 - 14, 2019 Washington DC INTRODUCTION Program Overview The 12th Annual Advanced Practice Provider (APRN & PA) Leadership Summit is a national forum for healthcare leaders and clinicians to share information, develop a consistent platform and map out solutions for universal and reoccurring struggles involving the administrative, managerial, policy and practice aspects of advanced practice providers (advanced practice nursing roles and physician assistants). Continuing Education Attendees will benefit from networking with other healthcare leaders and clinicians and will gain support and resources to enhance advanced practice at their Continuing Education (CE) organizations. Novel strategies and approaches to a Credit: APRNs & RNs variety of advanced practice topics will be shared. Advanced Practice Provider Executives, Interactive discussions with advanced practice leaders will Inc. (APPex) is an approved provider of help attendees learn about state, regional and national continuing nursing education by the challenges, successes and changes. California Board of Registered Nursing (Sacramento, CA). Educational Benefits Provider approved by the California • Network with other healthcare leaders and clinicians Board of Registered Nursing, Provider • Gain support and resources to enhance advanced Number 16233, for 28 contact hours. practice at your organization • Learn novel strategies and approaches to a variety of Continuing Medical advanced practice topics Education (CME) • Learn about state, regional and national challenges, Credit: PAs successes and changes through interactive discussion with advanced practice leaders This program has been reviewed and is approved for a maximum of 28 hours of Target Audience AAPA Category 1 CME credit by the Physician Assistant Review Panel. -
PCC Task Group for Coding Non-RDA Entities in Nars: Final Report November 16, 2020
1 PCC Task Group for Coding non-RDA Entities in NARs: Final Report November 16, 2020 Contents Executive summary 2 Recommendations 2 Charge, background, and scope 3 Purposes served by coding entity type 4 Purposes served by coding descriptive convention 4 Data model 5 Recommended terms for 075 6 Recommended coding for 040 $e 6 Implementation issues 7 Platform for hosting vocabulary 7 Maintenance and development of the vocabulary (extensibility) 7 Collaboration with DNB 8 Training and documentation 8 Out of scope issues 9 Fictitious characters and pseudonyms 9 Shared pseudonyms 11 Descriptive conventions for non-RDA entities 11 Elements for non-agent entities 12 Division of the world 12 Legacy data 13 Examples 13 Appendix: Charge and roster 18 2 Executive summary With the introduction of the LRM data model in the beta RDA Toolkit, it became necessary to distinguish RDA Agent and non-Agent entities in the LC Name Authority File. The PCC Policy Committee (PoCo) determined that 075 $a in the MARC authority format could be used to record this distinction, and that it would also be necessary to designate a different descriptive convention in 040 $e. PoCo charged the present Task Group to make recommendations for coding these subfields. In considering its recommendations, the Task Group identified the core use cases that would need to be met, and evaluated several potential data models. An important concern was that the proposed vocabulary be simple to maintain and apply. These considerations led the Task Group to recommend a small set of terms reflecting categories that are given distinct treatment in cataloging practice. -
Defense Primer: Reserve Forces
Updated January 28, 2021 Defense Primer: Reserve Forces The term reserve component (RC) refers collectively to the passes from the governor of the affected units and seven individual reserve components of the Armed Forces. personnel to the President of the United States. Congress exercises authority over the reserve components under its constitutional authority “to raise and support Reserve Categories Armies,” “to provide and maintain a Navy,” and “to All reservists, whether they are in the Reserves or the provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the National Guard, are assigned to one of three major reserve Militia.... ” (Article I, Section 8) categories: the Ready Reserve, the Standby Reserve, or the Retired Reserve. There are seven reserve components: Ready Reserve Army National Guard The Ready Reserve is the primary manpower pool of the reserve components. Members of the Ready Reserve will Army Reserve usually be called to active duty before members of the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve. The Ready Navy Reserve Reserve is made up of three subcomponents: Marine Corps Reserve The Selected Reserve contains those units and individuals within the Ready Reserve designated as “so Air National Guard essential to initial wartime missions that they have priority over all other Reserves.” (DOD Instruction Air Force Reserve 1215.06.) Members of the Selected Reserve are generally required to perform one weekend of training Coast Guard Reserve each month and two weeks of training each year, although some may train more than this. When The purpose of these seven reserve components, as codified reservists are activated, they most frequently come from in law, is to “provide trained units and qualified persons this category. -
Pentagon Salutes Revised Food Courts Options Range from Quick Bites to Sit-Down Dining by BARRY LOBERFELD ASSISTANT EDITOR
FACILITY PROFILE Pentagon Salutes Revised Food Courts Options Range From Quick Bites to Sit-Down Dining BY BARRY LOBERFELD ASSISTANT EDITOR aving completed the last in a seven-year three-stage renova- tion of Pentagon foodservice, the iconic Department of Defense H(DoD) building’s cuisine spans the spectrum from fast food to fi ne dining. Three main food courts comprise the lion’s share of Pentagon food service. Two of the food courts, each offering seating for approximately 250, feature a mélange of branded and non-branded concepts, includ- ing Peruvian Chicken, Taco Bell, McDonald’s, Dunkin’ Donuts, Sbarro and Panda Express, plus clerk-served salad bars and fresh sandwich and Panini stations. The largest food court, the Concourse Food Court, is also the one opened most recently, in September. It is an 875-seat space that houses a Burger King, Subway, Popeyes, Starbucks, RollerZ, Surf City Squeeze and a Dunkin’ Donuts/Baskin-Robbins joint concept. Single-unit food service operations, which are spaces featuring and run by only one business, include a 180-seat Sbarro; the Center Court Café, a 70-seat café located in the middle of the Pentagon’s Center Courtyard; a 40-seat Subway; a 24/7 Dominic’s food service operation; and various cart operations. On Dec. 2, 2009, foodservice renovation plans culminated with the new Pentagon Dining Room opening its doors, introducing a fi ne-dining experience and signaling the work had reached completion. “This facil- ity,” said Jeff Keppler, busi- ness manager/contracting offi cer for the Department of Defense Concessions Committee (DoDCC), “is a 220-seat tablecloth res- taurant that also offers two private function rooms, capable of seating 40 and another with a capacity of 20. -
ABBN-Final.Pdf
RESTRICTED CONTENTS SERIAL 1 Page 1. Introduction 1 - 4 2. Sri Lanka Army a. Commands 5 b. Branches and Advisors 5 c. Directorates 6 - 7 d. Divisions 7 e. Brigades 7 f. Training Centres 7 - 8 g. Regiments 8 - 9 h. Static Units and Establishments 9 - 10 i. Appointments 10 - 15 j. Rank Structure - Officers 15 - 16 k. Rank Structure - Other Ranks 16 l. Courses (Local and Foreign) All Arms 16 - 18 m. Course (Local and Foreign) Specified to Arms 18 - 21 SERIAL 2 3. Reference Points a. Provinces 22 b. Districts 22 c. Important Townships 23 - 25 SERIAL 3 4. General Abbreviations 26 - 70 SERIAL 4 5. Sri Lanka Navy a. Commands 71 i RESTRICTED RESTRICTED b. Classes of Ships/ Craft (Units) 71 - 72 c. Training Centres/ Establishments and Bases 72 d. Branches (Officers) 72 e. Branches (Sailors) 73 f. Branch Identification Prefix 73 - 74 g. Rank Structure - Officers 74 h. Rank Structure - Other Ranks 74 SERIAL 5 6. Sri Lanka Air Force a. Commands 75 b. Directorates 75 c. Branches 75 - 76 d. Air Force Bases 76 e. Air Force Stations 76 f. Technical Support Formation Commands 76 g. Logistical and Administrative Support Formation Commands 77 h. Training Formation Commands 77 i. Rank Structure Officers 77 j. Rank Structure Other Ranks 78 SERIAL 6 7. Joint Services a. Commands 79 b. Training 79 ii RESTRICTED RESTRICTED INTRODUCTION USE OF ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS 1. The word abbreviations originated from Latin word “brevis” which means “short”. Abbreviations, acronyms and initialisms are a shortened form of group of letters taken from a word or phrase which helps to reduce time and space. -
The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy. -
9 Purple 18/2
THE CONCORD REVIEW 223 A VERY PURPLE-XING CODE Michael Cohen Groups cannot work together without communication between them. In wartime, it is critical that correspondence between the groups, or nations in the case of World War II, be concealed from the eyes of the enemy. This necessity leads nations to develop codes to hide their messages’ meanings from unwanted recipients. Among the many codes used in World War II, none has achieved a higher level of fame than Japan’s Purple code, or rather the code that Japan’s Purple machine produced. The breaking of this code helped the Allied forces to defeat their enemies in World War II in the Pacific by providing them with critical information. The code was more intricate than any other coding system invented before modern computers. Using codebreaking strategy from previous war codes, the U.S. was able to crack the Purple code. Unfortunately, the U.S. could not use its newfound knowl- edge to prevent the attack at Pearl Harbor. It took a Herculean feat of American intellect to break Purple. It was dramatically intro- duced to Congress in the Congressional hearing into the Pearl Harbor disaster.1 In the ensuing years, it was discovered that the deciphering of the Purple Code affected the course of the Pacific war in more ways than one. For instance, it turned out that before the Americans had dropped nuclear bombs on Japan, Purple Michael Cohen is a Senior at the Commonwealth School in Boston, Massachusetts, where he wrote this paper for Tom Harsanyi’s United States History course in the 2006/2007 academic year. -
MAJOR GENERAL RAYMOND F. REES the Adjutant General, Oregon National Guard
MAJOR GENERAL RAYMOND F. REES The Adjutant General, Oregon National Guard Major General Raymond F. Rees assumed duties as The Adjutant General for Oregon on July 1, 2005. He is responsible for providing the State of Oregon and the United States with a ready force of citizen soldiers and airmen, equipped and trained to respond to any contingency, natural or manmade. He directs, manages, and supervises the administration, discipline, organization, training and mobilization of the Oregon National Guard, the Oregon State Defense Force, the Joint Force Headquarters and the Office of Oregon Emergency Management. He is also assigned as the Governor’s Homeland Security Advisor. He develops and coordinates all policies, plans and programs of the Oregon National Guard in concert with the Governor and legislature of the State. He began his military career in the United States Army as a West Point cadet in July 1962. Prior to his current assignment, Major General Rees had numerous active duty and Army National Guard assignments to include: service in the Republic of Vietnam as a cavalry troop commander; commander of the 116th Armored Calvary Regiment; nearly nine years as the Adjutant General of Oregon; Director of the Army National Guard, National Guard Bureau; over five years service as Vice Chief, National Guard Bureau; 14 months as Acting Chief, National Guard Bureau; Chief of Staff (dual-hatted), Headquarters North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM). NORAD is a binational, Canada and United States command. EDUCATION: US Military Academy, West Point, New York, BS University of Oregon, JD (Law) Command and General Staff College (Honor Graduate) Command and General Staff College, Pre-Command Course Harvard University Executive Program in National and International Security Senior Reserve Component Officer Course, United States Army War College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 1 ASSIGNMENTS: 1. -
9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5. -
Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure. -
ICAO Abbreviations and Codes
Doc 8400 Procedures for Air Navigation Services ICAO Abbreviations and Codes This edition incorporates all amendments approved by the Council prior to 24 July 2010 and supersedes, on 18 November 2010, all previous editions of PANS-ABC (Doc 8400). Eighth Edition — 2010 International Civil Aviation Organization Suzanne Doc 8400 Procedures for Air Navigation Services ICAO Abbreviations and Codes ________________________________ This edition incorporates all amendments approved by the Council prior to 24 July 2010 and supersedes, on 18 November 2010, all previous editions of PANS-ABC (Doc 8400). Eighth Edition — 2010 International Civil Aviation Organization Published in separate English, French, Russian and Spanish editions by the INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION 999 University Street, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 5H7 For ordering information and for a complete listing of sales agents and booksellers, please go to the ICAO website at www.icao.int First edition,1964. Seventh edition, 2007. Eighth edition, 2010. Doc 8400, Procedures for Air Navigation Services — ICAO Abbreviations and Codes Order Number: 8400 ISBN 978-92-9231-626-6 © ICAO 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing from the International Civil Aviation Organization. AMENDMENTS Amendments are announced in the supplements to the Catalogue of ICAO Publications; the Catalogue and its supplements are available on the ICAO website at www.icao.int. The space below is provided to keep a record of such amendments. RECORD OF AMENDMENTS AND CORRIGENDA AMENDMENTS CORRIGENDA Date Date Entered Date Date Entered No. -
Page 20 TITLE 32—NATIONAL GUARD § 314 § 314
§ 314 TITLE 32—NATIONAL GUARD Page 20 CROSS REFERENCES AMENDMENTS Army National Guard of United States and Air Na- 1991—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–190 struck out ‘‘each tional Guard of United States, enlistment, see section Territory and’’ before ‘‘the District of Columbia’’ in 12107 of Title 10, Armed Forces. first sentence, and struck out at end ‘‘To be eligible for appointment as adjutant general of a Territory, a per- SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS son must be a citizen of that jurisdiction.’’ This section is referred to in title 10 section 311. 1990—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 101–510 struck out at end ‘‘Each Secretary shall send with his annual report to § 314. Adjutants general Congress an abstract of the returns and reports of the (a) There shall be an adjutant general in each adjutants general and such comments as he considers necessary for the information of Congress.’’ State and Territory, Puerto Rico, and the Dis- 1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–456, § 1234(b)(1), struck trict of Columbia. He shall perform the duties out ‘‘the Canal Zone,’’ after ‘‘Puerto Rico,’’. prescribed by the laws of that jurisdiction. Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–456, § 1234(b)(5), struck out (b) The President shall appoint the adjutant ‘‘, the Canal Zone,’’ after ‘‘each Territory’’ and ‘‘or the general of the District of Columbia and pre- Canal Zone’’ after ‘‘a Territory’’. scribe his grade and qualifications. Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–456, § 1234(b)(1), struck out (c) The President may detail as adjutant gen- ‘‘the Canal Zone,’’ after ‘‘Puerto Rico,’’.