The Uruk Countryside

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Uruk Countryside The Uruk Countryside The Uruk Countryside The Natural Setting of Urban Societies Robert McC. Adams and Hans J.Nissen The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 1972 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 1972 Printed in the United States of America International Standard Book Number: 0-226-00500-3 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 78-179489 ERRATA: This map replaces figure 1, pages 2-3. The overlay showing the location of dunes and seasonal swamps is erroneously placed on the original. -- - - I % ^ 173 ? I I I )194(1*195l .! \\ 31030'N.LAT. \, m0 z 261 387 j\·388298 ý4O0 R' o o10 20 KM. I I I BAT- Contents Illustrations vii Preface ix 1 CONFIGURATIONS OF SETTLEMENT Robert McC. Adams xi 1. Physiographic Characteristics and Problems 1 2. Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Early Urbanization 9 3. Continuity and Change in Early Historic Settlements and Watercourses 35 Historical and Topographical Notes: Ur III- Old Babylonian Periods Hans J. Nissen 4. Resettlement and Abandonment in Later Antiquity 55 5. Recent Life and Settlement 67 6. The Uruk/Warka Region in Historic and Comparative Perspective 85 2 ANALYSIS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURFACE COLLECTIONS Hans J. Nissen 95 7. Typological Dating Criteria 97 8. Surface Collections 105 Appendix: Catalog of Surveyed Sites 219 Robert McC. Adams Index 239 Illustrations 1. Topographic map of ancient sites and water- 18. Cassite-Middle Babylonian settlements and courses in the Warka region 2-3 watercourses 40 2. Early Uruk and earlier sites 10 19. Neo-Babylonian-Seleucid settlements and 3. Late Uruk settlements and watercourses 13 watercourses 56 4. Jemdet Nasr settlements and watercourses 14 20. Parthian settlements and watercourses 60 5. Early Dynastic I settlements and watercourses 15 21. Sassanian settlements and watercourses 61 6. Late Early Dynastic settlements, watercourses, 22. Early-Middle Islamic settlements and water- and zones of cultivation 16 courses 64 7. Classification of early sites by period and area 17 23. Late Ottoman settlements and watercourses 69 8. Settlement typology, district boundaries, and 24. Contemporary tribal groupings in the Warka patterns of abandonment in the Jemdet Nasr region 70 and Early Dynastic I periods 20 25. Qalca Kharkhara, a late nineteenth century 9. Distribution of early sites by period and five- settlement and stronghold 75 kilometer square 21 26. Late nineteenth century enclave of irrigation 10. Actual and random dispersion of early sites by and settlement around Qalca Sussa 77 period 22 27. Ruins of Qalca Sussa 78 11. Early composite sites and site clusters 24 28. Plans of representative Late Ottoman strong- 12. A Jemdet Nasr marsh settlement 25 holds 79 13. Nonurban population density, average settle- 29. Qalca Falhiya, an early twentieth century ment size, and nearest neighbor coefficients in stronghold 80 early periods 26 30. Pottery type chart: Early Uruk-Early Dynastic I 101 14. A Late Uruk settlement cluster or enclave 28 31. Distribution of the types in figure 30 102 15. Relationship between population size and 32. List of sites from which the pottery is published 106 density in fifty-three Khuzestan villages 29 33-80. Pottery from selected sites 109-203 16. Population density in Uruk sustaining area 31 81-82. Metal vessels from selected sites 204-205 17. Akkadian-Old Babylonian settlements and watercourses 36 83. A baked clay temple model 215 J I Preface The archaeological reconnaissance furnishing the sub- tions whose paradigm shifted and is to a certain extent stantive data for this study was conducted over a four imposed only arbitrarily-it was undeniable that sys- and one-half month period during the winter and spring tematic study of the sustaining areas of the great cities of of 1967. It had its inception in a discussion between Pro- southern Sumer was long overdue. fessor Heinrich Lenzen, then director of the Baghdad From the outset, this study was conceived not as a Abteilung of the Deutsche Archaiologische Institut, and repetition of survey approaches previously employed in Dr. Henry T. Wright, who at that time was conducting other areas but as a further elaboration of them. Since a reconnaissance and soundings in the region around Warka lay near the lower end of the alluvium, it was to ancient Ur. Professor Lenzen expressed an interest in be expected that the remains of early periods would be extending an archaeological survey approach into the substantially less masked by later settlements and alluvi- desert lands around the great ruined mounds of ancient ation deposits than were similar remains farther north. Uruk-modern Warka-where for many years the Hence it seemed likely that settlement and irrigation pat- Deutsche Archaiologische Institut has sponsored one of terns might be investigated in considerable detail even the most far-sighted and comprehensive programs of for as early a period as the late fourth and early third excavation yet developed in the Middle East. Other com- millennia, a time during which Uruk emerged as one of mitments led Dr. Wright to demur from conducting such a the oldest and largest of Mesopotamian urban centers. reconnaissance himself, whereupon the initiative fell to To this end, a program was envisioned that would ex- me. tend over a considerable span of years. The first step was Having previously conducted somewhat analagous to have been a wide-ranging reconnaissance of the kind operations over much of the northern portion of the reported here, in which systematic coverage was sacrificed Mesopotamian plain, I viewed the possibility of extend- for knowledge of the larger geographic setting. From that ing the same approach into the classic heartland of point onward, plans were projected for detailed studies southern Sumer as a most welcome opportunity. Pro- of the hydrology and ecology of portions of the ancient fessor Benno Landsberger had once characterized the irrigation system. Also contemplated were further, more manuscript of my earlier study of changing systems of systematic resurveys aimed at small areas and particular settlement and irrigation on the alluvial fan of the lower problems, and ultimately test soundings in representative Diyala River as an attempt to describe a dialect before early sites. the paradigm of the heartland was known.' Although I It should be stressed that the field approach in 1967 do not fully share his view that the most significant de- was not only planned but executed on the assumption velopments of the past were encapsulated in a restricted that it was only a part of this long-range framework. region and span of time-I prefer to regard Mesopo- What has emerged with increasing clarity from all such tamian civilization as a bundle of indefinitely ongoing studies is that archaeological surface reconnaissance is not dialects, an interacting system of regions and specializa- a sharply bounded, independently justified, and more or less fixed body of techniques, but instead is a variable 1. R. McC. Adams, Land behind Baghdad: A History of component within a wide and growing complex of eco- Settlement on the Diyala Plains (Chicago, 1965), p. ix. logically oriented investigations of the kind sketched ix PREFACE above. But in the sequel, political and other changes the surveyed sites. To a considerably larger degree than stemming initially from the June 1967 war made it im- these complementary but separate sections suggest, this possible to pursue the other elements in this wider com- entire work should thus be regarded as a product of joint plex. Hence the findings reported here are less well sup- authorship. ported and detailed than it was intended that they should It is a pleasure to acknowledge the personal and in- be. Indeed, the exceptional quantity and quality of evi- tellectual debts incurred in this undertaking. We are dence awaiting the archaeologist directly on the surface grateful, first, to Professor Lenzen for perceiving the need in the Warka region demands further work at the earliest for it and for unstintingly lending the resources of the opportunity. The spirit of developing a many-sided Deutsche Archiiologische Institut toward its successful ecological approach, however, is not consistent with the completion. Dr. Nissen was at that time a member of the postponement of publication pending some indefinite staff of the Baghdad Abteilung, and in graciously agree- final truth. Although we acknowledge the tantalizing in- ing to his full participation in the entire course of the completeness at many points of what it has been possible reconnaissance Professor Lenzen took an essential step in to learn thus far, the results nevertheless seem to signif- making this jointly sponsored project possible. My own icantly enhance our processual understanding of the participation, originally planned as an exclusively Orien- growth of a major ancient civilization. Perhaps equally tal Institute commitment, was made substantially more important, publication at this point serves to enlarge the effective through my appointment as Annual Professor of empirical basis for settlement-pattern studies-and it the Baghdad School of the American Schools of Oriental provides a target for criticisms that can lead to future Research for 1966-67. I also owe a more personal debt of improvements in methods. gratitude to Professor George R. Hughes, who took over By far the greater part of the fieldwork in the Warka my duties at home as director of the Oriental Institute region was conducted jointly by Dr. Nissen and myself. for the period of the fieldwork, and who then succeeded There was a rough and informal division of labor in which me in that post in July 1968. I attended mainly to mapping problems, with the aid of As on so many previous occasions, the officers and staff aerial photographs, while he selected sherd samples for of the Iraq Directorate General of Antiquities were unfail- systematic discussion and illustration.
Recommended publications
  • 2210 Bc 2200 Bc 2190 Bc 2180 Bc 2170 Bc 2160 Bc 2150 Bc 2140 Bc 2130 Bc 2120 Bc 2110 Bc 2100 Bc 2090 Bc
    2210 BC 2200 BC 2190 BC 2180 BC 2170 BC 2160 BC 2150 BC 2140 BC 2130 BC 2120 BC 2110 BC 2100 BC 2090 BC Fertile Crescent Igigi (2) Ur-Nammu Shulgi 2192-2190BC Dudu (20) Shar-kali-sharri Shu-Turul (14) 3rd Kingdom of 2112-2095BC (17) 2094-2047BC (47) 2189-2169BC 2217-2193BC (24) 2168-2154BC Ur 2112-2004BC Kingdom Of Akkad 2234-2154BC ( ) (2) Nanijum, Imi, Elulu Imta (3) 2117-2115BC 2190-2189BC (1) Ibranum (1) 2180-2177BC Inimabakesh (5) Ibate (3) Kurum (1) 2127-2124BC 2113-2112BC Inkishu (6) Shulme (6) 2153-2148BC Iarlagab (15) 2121-2120BC Puzur-Sin (7) Iarlaganda ( )(7) Kingdom Of Gutium 2177-2171BC 2165-2159BC 2142-2127BC 2110-2103BC 2103-2096BC (7) 2096-2089BC 2180-2089BC Nikillagah (6) Elulumesh (5) Igeshaush (6) 2171-2165BC 2159-2153BC 2148-2142BC Iarlagash (3) Irarum (2) Hablum (2) 2124-2121BC 2115-2113BC 2112-2110BC ( ) (3) Cainan 2610-2150BC (460 years) 2120-2117BC Shelah 2480-2047BC (403 years) Eber 2450-2020BC (430 years) Peleg 2416-2177BC (209 years) Reu 2386-2147BC (207 years) Serug 2354-2124BC (200 years) Nahor 2324-2176BC (199 years) Terah 2295-2090BC (205 years) Abraham 2165-1990BC (175) Genesis (Moses) 1)Neferkare, 2)Neferkare Neby, Neferkamin Anu (2) 3)Djedkare Shemay, 4)Neferkare 2169-2167BC 1)Meryhathor, 2)Neferkare, 3)Wahkare Achthoes III, 4)Marykare, 5)............. (All Dates Unknown) Khendu, 5)Meryenhor, 6)Neferkamin, Kakare Ibi (4) 7)Nykare, 8)Neferkare Tereru, 2167-2163 9)Neferkahor Neferkare (2) 10TH Dynasty (90) 2130-2040BC Merenre Antyemsaf II (All Dates Unknown) 2163-2161BC 1)Meryibre Achthoes I, 2)............., 3)Neferkare, 2184-2183BC (1) 4)Meryibre Achthoes II, 5)Setut, 6)............., Menkare Nitocris Neferkauhor (1) Wadjkare Pepysonbe 7)Mery-........, 8)Shed-........, 9)............., 2183-2181BC (2) 2161-2160BC Inyotef II (-1) 2173-2169BC (4) 10)............., 11)............., 12)User......
    [Show full text]
  • Two Old Babylonian Texts from MARAD ( Wana Wa AL Sodum ) Dr
    2012م/1433هـ (ADAB AL-RAFIDAYN, VOL.(63 Two old Babylonian Texts from MARAD ( Wana wa AL_Sodum ) Dr. Saad.S. Fahad * & Dr Abbas.A. AL-hussainy تأريخ التقديم: 32/5/3122 تأريخ القبول: 3122/6/8 Preface:- The site of Marad(Sumerian MARDA, modern Tell wana wa al-sodum) was an ancient Sumerian city situated on the west bank of the western branch of the Euphrates river, west of Nippur and roughly 50 km southeast of kish, on the Aratu river, it was established ca.2700 B.C during the Sumerian Early Dynastic II period. The site of Marad covered on area of less than 124 hectares(50 acres),it was excavated by a team from Al- Qadisiya university in 1990 led by Dr. Nael Hannon, and in 2005 and 2007 led by Dr. Abbas,A., al-hussainy, publication of the last two seasons is in progress(1). During the Archaeological excavation on second season 2005 a number of cuneiform texts were found in different points in the site. After a primary study for these cuneiform texts it was cleared that many of them belong to the old Babylonian period, while there were few number of them belong to a more modern period(new Babylon period). the subjects of these texts, were various according to the variety of the daily life at that time, but one can say that the general Dep.of Archaeology/ College of Arts 38 Two old Babylonian Texts from MARAD (Wana wa AL_Sodum) Dr. Saad.S. Fahad& Dr.Abbas.A. AL-hussainy pattern of these texts were like the contract type of texts(contracts of buying lands).These texts contain date formula and the names of local kings who ruled at that place,
    [Show full text]
  • Marten Stol WOMEN in the ANCIENT NEAR EAST
    Marten Stol WOMEN IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson ISBN 978-1-61451-323-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-61451-263-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0021-3 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Original edition: Vrouwen van Babylon. Prinsessen, priesteressen, prostituees in de bakermat van de cultuur. Uitgeverij Kok, Utrecht (2012). Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson © 2016 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Cover Image: Marten Stol Typesetting: Dörlemann Satz GmbH & Co. KG, Lemförde Printing and binding: cpi books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Introduction 1 Map 5 1 Her outward appearance 7 1.1 Phases of life 7 1.2 The girl 10 1.3 The virgin 13 1.4 Women’s clothing 17 1.5 Cosmetics and beauty 47 1.6 The language of women 56 1.7 Women’s names 58 2 Marriage 60 2.1 Preparations 62 2.2 Age for marrying 66 2.3 Regulations 67 2.4 The betrothal 72 2.5 The wedding 93 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • A PRELIMINARY STUDY of the SUMERIAN CURRICULAR and LAMENTATIONAL TEXTS from the OLD BABYLONIAN CITY of KISH by Joshua A. Bowen A
    A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE SUMERIAN CURRICULAR AND LAMENTATIONAL TEXTS FROM THE OLD BABYLONIAN CITY OF KISH by Joshua A. Bowen A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland February, 2017 © 2017 Joshua A. Bowen All Rights Reserved Abstract The collections of Sumerian and Akkadian tablets that have been excavated at various Old Babylonian sites have been surveyed and subjected to corpus-based analysis, including the tablets from prominent cities such as Nippur, Ur, Sippar, Isin, and Uruk. However, until very recently, attention has not focused on the important northern city of Kiš. Although many of the literary and liturgical duplicates from Kiš have been translated and discussed, neither the curricular nor the lamentational corpora have been treated as a whole. The goal of my dissertation, therefore, is to survey and analyze the entirety of the Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1600 BCE) curricular and lamentational textual material from Kiš in order to identify local features or traditions that were unique to these genres. The survey of the curricular textual material will seek to accomplish two goals. First, it will identify the curricular compositions that were used in scribal education at Kiš during the OB period. Second, it will determine the ways in which the Kiš scribal curriculum deviated from the curricula that are known from other OB cites, such as Nippur, Ur, and Sippar. The latter investigation will reveal two patterns at Kiš. First, it will demonstrate that, although several curricular duplicates varied from manuscripts found at the major scribal center, Nippur, there is evidence to suggest that there were lines of textual transmission that connected the OB Kiš lexical tradition to those that were found in the MB and the first millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nebuchadnezzar Cylinder (With Illustrations)
    A NEBUCHADNEZZAR CYLINDER. BY EDGAR J. BANKS. IN recent years the Babylonian Arabs have learned a new industry from the excavators, for when no more lucrative employment is to be had, they become archeologists, and though it is forbidden to excavate for antiquities without special permission, they roam about the desert digging into the ruins at will. A day's journey to the south of Babylon, near the Euphrates, is a ruin mound so small that it has scarcely attracted the attention of the explorers. It is marked upon the maps as Wannet es-Sa'adun, but among the Arabs of the surrounding region it is known as Wana Sadoum. During the past two years this mound has been the scene of the illicit labor of the Arabs. The greatest of all ancient builders was Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon from 604 to 561 B. C. There is scarcely a ruin in all southern Mesopotamia which does not contain bricks stamped with his name, or some other evidences of his activity. He de- lighted in restoring the ancient temples which had long been in ruins, and in supporting the neglected sacrifices to the gods. He preferred to build new cities and enlarge the old ones rather than to wage war. Few of his records hint of military expeditions, for he was a man of peace, and it is as a builder or restorer of old temples that he should best be known. That his name might be remembered it was his custom, when restoring a temple, to in- scribe large cylinders of clay with his building records, and to bury them in the walls of the structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumero-Babylonian King Lists and Date Lists A
    XI Sumero-Babylonian King Lists and Date Lists A. R. GEORGE The Antediluvian King List The antediluvian king list is an Old Babylonian (b) a tablet from Nippur, now in Istanbul text, composed in Sumerian, that purports to (Kraus 1952: 31) document the reigns of successive kings of (c) another reportedly from Khafaje (Tutub), remote antiquity, from the time when the gods now in Berkeley, California (Finkelstein first transmitted to mankind the institution of 1963: 40) kingship until the interruption of human histo- (d) a further tablet now in the Karpeles Manu- ry by the great Flood. The list exists in several script Library, Santa Barbara, California, versions. Sometimes it appears as the opening given below in a preliminary transliteration section of the Sumerian King List, as in text (No. 97) No. 98 below. More often it occurs as an inde- (e) a small fragment from Nippur now in Phil- pendent list, of which one example is held by adelphia that bears lines from the list fol- the Schøyen collection, published here as text lowed by other text (Peterson 2008). No. 96. Other examples of the Old Babylonian A more extensive treatment of the lists of ante- list of antediluvian kings copied independently diluvian kings, including No. 96 and the tablet of the Sumerian King List are: in the Karpeles Manuscript Library, is promised (a) the tablet W-B 62, of uncertain prove- by Gianni Marchesi as part of his forthcoming nance and now in the Ashmolean Museum larger study of the Sumerian king lists. (Langdon 1923 pl. 6) No.
    [Show full text]
  • GLASSNER, J.-J. — the Invention of Cuneiform.Writing in Sumer
    57 BOEKBESPREKINGEN — ASSYRIOLOGIE 58 Glassner takes the relevant passage of Enmerkar’s letter to the sovereign of Aratta as containing enough magical force to “nail down” the Arattan to obedience to the mythical master of Uruk, referring, i. a., to the Mesopotamian custom of “clinching” house sales by driving a nail into the wall as a symbol of possession. He believes that this is exactly what happened to the lord of Aratta, who was “taken possession of” by the wedge(s) of the script in which Enmerkar’s message was written. The second chapter focuses on the review of the current state of knowledge of the emergence of cuneiform writing in ancient Southwestern Asia. Here the author takes, more or less, the side of authors of most manuals — cuneiform writ- ing is supposed to have been invented probably in southern Mesopotamia, in Late Uruk times (c. 3,500 — 3,200 B. C.). Here let us acknowledge with gratitude the diligence of the translators who complemented the book’s bibliography with works published after its appearance in French in 2000. Jean- Jacques Glassner’s conclusions based on the work of Diet- rich Sürenhagen may now be checked from the latter author’s own publication (Sürenhagen 1999). Here I wish to add a few of my own observations on the age of the invention of the cuneiform script: 1) it is likely to have been invented at the very end of — or, shortly after the extinction of — the Halaf culture, as the parallels between Halaf-culture repertory of symbols and the thesaurus of the earliest cuneiform signs are very few (Charvát 2002, 91-92), 2) the age of its invention may fall with in the Ubaid period: the leading decoration principle of Ubaid-culture pottery — the “Gleitspiegelung”, or mirror image — represents ASSYRIOLOGIE one of the procedures used in the earliest cuneiform (Glassner, op.
    [Show full text]
  • Urnamma of Ur in Sumerian Literary Tradition
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 1999 Urnamma of Ur in Sumerian Literary Tradition Flückiger-Hawker, Esther Abstract: This book presents new standard editions of all the hitherto known hymns of Urnamma, the founder of the Third Dynasty of Ur (fl. 2100 B.C.), and adds new perspectives to the compositions and development of the genre of Sumerian royal hymns in general. The first chapter (I) is introductory in nature (historical background, the reading of the name Urnamma, Sumerian royal hymns). The second chapter (II) presents a general survey of Urnamma’s hymnic corpus, including arguments for a broader definition of Sumerian royal hymns and an attempt at classifying the non-standard orthography found in Urnamma’s hymns. The third chapter (III) deals with correlations of Urnamma’s hymns with other textual sources pertaining to him. A fourth chapter (IV) is devoted to aspects of continuity and change in royal hymnography by analyzing the Urnamma hymns in relation to other royal hymns and related genres. A discussion of topoi of legitimation and kingship and narrative materials in different text types during different periods of time and other findings concerning statues, stelas and royal hymns addnew perspectives to the ongoing discussion of the original setting of royal hymns. Also, reasons are given why a version of the Sumerian King List may well be dated to Urnamma and the thesis advanced that Išmēdagan of Isin was not only an imitator of Šulgi but also of Urnamma. The final of the chapter IV shows that Urnamma A, also known as Urnamma’s Death, uses the language of lamentation literature and Curse of Agade which describe the destruction of cities, and applies it to the death of a king.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Start Comes from God: Theological, Historical, and Sociological Background of the Clean-Slate Acts of Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 15
    A Fresh Start Comes from God: Theological, Historical, and Sociological Background of the Clean-Slate Acts of Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 15 Von der Theologischen Fakultät der Universität Leipzig angenommene D I S S E R T A T I O N zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades DOCTRIX PHILOSOPHIAE (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt von SandyJo Dorothea Rogers geboren am 15.08.1979 in Fort Huachuca, Arizona, the United States of America Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Schüle Dr. habil. Takayoshi Oshima Tag der Verteidigung: 11. Mai 2020 ii Selbständigkeitserklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, die vorliegende Dissertation selbständig und ohne unerlaubte fremde Hilfe angefertigt zu haben. Ich habe keine anderen als die im Schriftenverzeichnis angeführten Quellen benutzt und sämtliche Textstellen, die wörtlich oder sinngemäß aus veröffentlichten oder unveröffentlichten Schriften entnommen wurden, und alle Angaben, die auf mündlichen Auskünften beruhen, als solche kenntlich gemacht. Ebenfalls sind alle von anderen Personen bereitgestellten Materialien oder erbrachten Dienstleistungen als solche gekennzeichnet. I hereby declare that I have completed the present dissertation independently and without unauthorized assistance. I have not used any sources other than those listed in the bibliography and I have marked as such all passages of text taken literally or in spirit from published or unpublished writings and all information based on oral information. All materials or services provided by other persons are also marked as such. Leipzig, am 30.01.2020 SandyJo Dorothea Rogers Abstract The clean-slate acts of the Hebrew Bible, i.e., the Year of Jubilee in Leviticus 25 and the Šemittah Year and the Law of Slave Release in Deut 15:1-18, are a part of the tradition of clean-slate acts in the ancient Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • Chastised Rulers in the Ancient Near East
    Chastised Rulers in the Ancient Near East Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree doctor of philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By J. H. Price, M.A., B.A. Graduate Program in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Samuel A. Meier, Advisor Daniel Frank Carolina López-Ruiz Bill T. Arnold Copyright by J. H. Price 2015 Abstract In the ancient world, kings were a common subject of literary activity, as they played significant social, economic, and religious roles in the ancient Near East. Unsurprisingly, the praiseworthy deeds of kings were often memorialized in ancient literature. However, in some texts kings were remembered for criminal acts that brought punishment from the god(s). From these documents, which date from the second to the first millennium BCE, we learn that royal acts of sacrilege were believed to have altered the fate of the offending king, his people, or his nation. These chastised rulers are the subject of this this dissertation. In the pages that follow, the violations committed by these rulers are collected, explained, and compared, as are the divine punishments that resulted from royal sacrilege. Though attestations are concentrated in the Hebrew Bible and Mesopotamian literature, the very fact that the chastised ruler type also surfaces in Ugaritic, Hittite, and Northwest Semitic texts suggests that the concept was an integral part of ancient near eastern kingship ideologies. Thus, this dissertation will also explain the relationship between kings and gods and the unifying aspect of kingship that gave rise to the chastised ruler concept across the ancient Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • Babylonian Empire 9/13/11 3:47 PM
    Babylonian Empire 9/13/11 3:47 PM home : index : ancient Mesopotamia : article by Jona Lendering © Babylonian Empire The Babylonian Empire was the most powerful state in the ancient world after the fall of the Assyrian empire (612 BCE). Its capital Babylon was beautifully adorned by king Nebuchadnezzar, who erected several famous buildings. Even after the Babylonian Empire had been overthrown by the Persian king Cyrus the Great (539), the city itself remained an important cultural center. Old Babylonian Period Kassite Period Old Babylonian Period Middle Babylonian Period Assyrian Period King Hammurabi and Šamaš Capital of the stele with the Laws The city of Babylon makes its first appearance in our sources after the Neo-Babylonian Period of Hammurabi (Louvre) fall of the Empire of the Third Dynasty of Ur, which had ruled the city Later history states of the alluvial plain between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris for Related more than a century (2112-2004?). An agricultural crisis meant the Mesopotamian Kings end of this centralized state, and several more or less nomadic tribes Chronology settled in southern Mesopotamia. One of these was the nation of the Amorites ("westerners"), which took over Isin, Larsa, and Babylon. Their kings are known as the First Dynasty of Babylon (1894-1595?). The area was reunited by Hammurabi, a king of Babylon of Amorite descent (1792-1750?). From his reign on, the alluvial plain of southern Iraq was called, with a deliberate archaism, Mât Akkadî, "the country of Akkad", after the city that had united the region centuries before. We call it Babylonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Fragments
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA THE UNIVERSITY MUSEUM PUBLICATIONS OF THE BABYLONIAN SECTION VOL.XI11 HISTORICAL FRAGMENTS li I' LEON LEGRAIN EEIILADE1,PHIA PUB1,ISHED BY TIIE UNIVERSITY RiUSEUM 1922 CONTENTS PAGE IN'TKODUCTION ................................. j9 NI~PURCHRONOLOGY ........................... I 1-13 CITIESOF SUMERAND AKKAD................... 14 TRANSLATION AND COIMMENTARY LIST OF KINGS(NO . I, 2) ...................... 15-28 THEEND OF THE ~'HIRDUK DYNASTY.IBI-SIN AND ISBI-IRRA(NO . 3. 6. 9) ..................... 28-33 A SEALGIVEN BY IBI-SINTO THE HIGHPRIEST OF ENLIL(NO . 5) ............................. 34-41 LIST OF TEMPLES(NO . 7. 16) ................... 41-45 CLAYTAG FROM SURUPIJAK(NO . 12) ............ 47 SEAL I.MPRESSION OF THE TIMEOF GIMIL-SIN (No. 13).................................. 47-48 INSCRIPTIONS OF SARGON(NO . 14. 15)........... 48-50 VOTIVECONE OF ARAD-SIN(NO . 18) ............ 51-54 UR-ENGURAND NIN-SUN(NO . 23) ............... 55-60 BAL KANIZI(NO . 24) ........................... 60 NIN-DIN-UG-GA(NO . 26) ........................ 61 RUINOF MAERON A PRFSARGONICDATE (NO. 27) 62-63 PATESIOF MARAD(No . 28) ..................... 63-64 PATES{OF A~NUNNA(NO . 31)................... 65 INCANTATION. KITLIALOF THE DEAD(NO . 33) .... 66 SUMERIANLETTER ON FII;LI)S AND ORCHARDS (N0.34) .................................. 67 ~NCANTAT~ONBY 'THE BROKENREED OF APSU (NO. 3j) .................................. 68 FRAGMENTOF TI-IE CODE,SLAVES' WAGES (NO . 39) 70 HYMNTO NINAZU(NO . 41) ..................... 71-74 RUILDING~NSCR~PT~ON OF DUNGI(NO . 42) ....... 74-77 BUILD~NC~NSCRIPTION (NARAMSIN, HAMAZI) (No. 43) .................................. 77-78 1-ITURGY OF PA-GIBIL-SAG(NO . 44) .............. 78-80 TUMMALOF NINLIL (NO . 48) ................. 80-82 PRAISEOF LIBIT-ISTAR(NO . 49) .............. 82-83 (3) PAGE ,\ IJ~r2SE FOR LAND,THk; j.lH YEAR AFTER 'IIIE CAPTUREOF ISIN (NO.
    [Show full text]